What Is a Group? Young Children’s Perceptions of Different Types of Groups and Group Entitativity

To date, developmental research on groups has focused mainly on in-group biases and intergroup relations. However, little is known about children’s general understanding of social groups and their perceptions of different forms of group. In this study, 5- to 6-year-old children were asked to evaluate prototypes of four key types of groups: an intimacy group (friends), a task group (people who are collaborating), a social category (people who look alike), and a loose association (people who coincidently meet at a tram stop). In line with previous work with adults, the vast majority of children perceived the intimacy group, task group, and social category, but not the loose association, to possess entitativity, that is, to be a ‘real group.’ In addition, children evaluated group member properties, social relations, and social obligations differently in each type of group, demonstrating that young children are able to distinguish between different types of in-group relations. The origins of the general group typology used by adults thus appear early in development. These findings contribute to our knowledge about children''s intuitive understanding of groups and group members'' behavior.Young children grow up in a complex social world in which they are constantly flooded with social information. Our social world is composed not only of individuals but of an array of different relationships and social groupings. One challenge for children is to decipher which of these social groupings are meaningful. People can appear to be a group from the outside, for example simply because they are in close proximity to each other, but they can be connected with each other at different levels: they can be kin or friends, be on the same sports or work team, be part of the same national or language group, or they can be associated with each other only briefly and loosely when, for instance, they take the same bus to get to the airport, or line up at a counter at the same time. Determining the type of group to which an association of people belongs is not only crucial for being able to understand individual group members’ behavior but can also be a short-cut to predicting how group members will relate to each other. For example, one can expect kin or friends to be loyal to each other, but one might not expect this about people who happen to be lining up at a counter at the same time. Another important form of predictions that can be drawn from social groupings, but which has been understudied in previous research (see also [1]), regards the grouping as a whole. For example, a friendship is supposed to be a longer-lasting, more coherent entity than a gathering in front of a counter.When it comes to the perception of social groupings, Lickel and colleagues [2] have argued that adults apply a folk typology, in which they intuitively distinguish between four qualitatively different types of groups. In support of this idea, Lickel at el. [3] investigated how adult participants sorted 40 examples of real-life groups, and how they rated each of these groups on a set of eight group characteristics such as shared goals, similarity of group members, interaction among group members, and group size. They found that participants distinguished four basic types of groups: intimacy groups (such as families and friends), task groups (such as work or sports teams), social categories (such as women or U.S. citizens), and loose associations (such as people waiting in line at a counter). Participants associated different group characteristics with each group type, for example a long duration and high levels of interaction for intimacy groups, common goals and interaction in task groups, large size and member similarity for social categories, and short duration and low levels of similarity and common goals for loose associations (for an overview, see [2]). Related research has shown that adults treat some social groupings as entities [4–6]. The extent to which a group appears to be a coherent entity and therefore possesses a quality of “groupness” has been referred to as “entitativity” [2–5, 7]. Lickel and colleagues showed that the four types of groups were perceived by adults to have different levels of entitativity, with the highest level for intimacy groups, followed by task groups, social categories, and loose associations.This group typology has received further support and validation from work in anthropology [8, 9]. Interdisciplinary work has linked these different types of groups to different relational models that are more or less prominent within each group type [10]. For example, communal sharing, a relationship in which I see “what is mine as yours” is more pronounced in intimacy groups than in other types of groups. It has been argued that children do not develop a fully-fledged concept of these different relational models before nine or ten years of age [8, 9].Despite the theoretical importance of this group typology, very little research has investigated its origins in childhood. Instead, developmental research on group cognition in young children has focused mainly on children’s in-group biases, that is, their preference for members of their own group over members of other groups. Research in this tradition has shown that children prefer members of their own group on a variety of implicit and explicit measures [11–14]. Another line of research focuses on the inferences children draw about individuals based on their group membership. For example, 4- to 6-year-old children predict what a person will do, like, or intend on the basis of that person’s gender, race, or ethnicity [15–17]. Children also use information about group membership to make inferences about social interactions: Knowing that two individuals are either from the same or from two different groups influences their prediction about whether those individuals will harm each other (around 4 years; [18]), help each other (from 6 years; [18]), or be friends with each other (from 7 years; [19]).However, this body of research leaves at least three significant gaps in our knowledge about children’s understanding of groups. First, previous research has focused primarily on just one type of group: the one Lickel and colleagues refer to as social categories, thus limiting what we can conclude about children’s understanding of group relations more generally (although see, e.g., [7, 20, 21], for work on preferential behavior towards intimacy and task group members). Second, the main focus of this previous research has been on children’s attitudes and expectations about in-group as compared with out-group members. However, as illustrated in our introductory examples, relationships among members of an in-group may differ in systematic ways depending on the type of in-group to which they belong. Finally, previous work has focused mainly on children’s perceptions of and expectations about individual group members rather than on their perceptions of and expectations about the group as a whole. It is thus important for our understanding of the development of group psychology to ask whether children distinguish different types of social groups and whether they expect relationships within and characteristics of these types of groups to differ from each other.One exception to this general trend is a study conducted by Svirydzenka and colleagues [7]. They found that 10-year-old children intuitively distinguish the same four main types of groups as adults: intimacy groups, task groups, social categories, and loose associations. They also judged the level of entitativity of different group types in similar ways as adults, but their assessments seemed to rely on group characteristics that were more perceptually salient (for example the level of interaction) than adults, who focused on more abstract features such as the importance of the group for its members [22].Inspired by this study and Lickel and colleagues’ work [3], we investigated whether the origins of this folk theory of groups could be seen even in children as young as 5 to 6 years of age. This is an important age in the development of group cognition as 5 to 6 years appears to be just at the border of explicit group understanding. It is at this age that children first show a more general preference for in-group members, even in more abstract and novel groups (in the minimal group paradigm; [21, 23]). Furthermore, it is also at this age that children first become able to predict intergroup relations in third party contexts at least for social categories (e.g., [16, 18]).Thus our objective was to investigate whether, in addition to these preferences and expectations, children of this age also have a more general understanding of groups and different types of group–in other words, an early folk typology of groups. Several prominent theoretical accounts of the origins of intergroup psychology postulate substantial development between the age group in our study and the youngest age, so far, at which a group typology has been found, 10 years [24–26]. However, given their relatively sophisticated abilities in other areas of group cognition, we predicted that already by 5 to 6 years of age, children would be able to make subtle distinctions between different types of groups and use this understanding in order to make inferences about group members’ behaviors within different group types.As a first step, we measured children’s spontaneous definition of a group. We did this to investigate children’s naïve, spontaneous ideas about groups, before presenting them with different group types. We predicted that children would be able to give some appropriate examples of groups and were especially interested in whether they would focus on one particular example or definition when thinking about groups (e.g., mention just one group type), or whether they would be able to give a more abstract definition (covering all group types, such as “a collection of people”). Second, because recent work has shown that 5-year-old children have comparable preferences for two types of group members–task group members and social category members [21]–we investigated which of these two examples (operationalized as people who work together vs. people who are similar to each other) children thought was most representative of a group. Third, we investigated whether preschool children would see an intimacy group, a task group, a social category, and a loose association as qualitatively different.It was impossible, given the young age of our participants, to adopt the exact methods of previous studies, which used complex tasks such as sorting of examples of groups and rating multiple group characteristics for each example. To simplify the procedure so that young children would understand it, we thus created a prototype for each of the four types of groups and asked children to judge these prototypes on entitativity and 12 other group characteristics. These group characteristics were generally inspired by the characteristics Lickel et al. [3] and Svirydzenka et al. [7] chose. However, in addition, we asked about several further characteristics that are important topics in recent work on the developmental origins of group psychology (e.g., [20, 27–29]) and anthropology [8, 9]. There were four main sets of group characteristics. The first three involved judgments and predictions about individual group members and group member relationships (see, e.g., [27]). The first set involved judgments about social obligations and prosocial behaviors among group members (helping, sharing, and loyalty; e.g., [18, 20, 28, 30]). The second involved the quality of group members’ social relationships (liking, familiarity, interdependence, and joint goals; [7, 31]). The third involved properties marking fundamental similarities among group members (group member similarity, shared preferences, and common knowledge; [29, 32, 33]). The fourth set, in contrast, involved traits of the group itself, concerning characteristics that apply to the group as a whole, rather than to individual members (permeability, continuance, and entitativity; [3]). We predicted generally that children’s perceptions of and expectations about groups would be contingent upon the type of group they were presented with and that they would recognize that a loose association was not a real group.     

Cyclic AMP- and (Rp)-cAMPS-induced Conformational Changes in a Complex of the Catalytic and Regulatory (RIα) Subunits of Cyclic AMP-dependent Protein Kinase

We took a discovery approach to explore the actions of cAMP and two of its analogs, one a cAMP mimic ((S_p)-adenosine cyclic 3′:5′-monophosphorothioate ((S_p)-cAMPS)) and the other a diastereoisomeric antagonist ((R_p)-cAMPS), on a model system of the type Iα cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase holoenzyme, RIα(91–244)·C-subunit, by using fluorescence spectroscopy and amide H/²H exchange mass spectrometry. Specifically, for the fluorescence experiments, fluorescein maleimide was conjugated to three cysteine single residue substitution mutants, R92C, T104C, and R239C, of RIα(91–244), and the effects of cAMP, (S_p)-cAMPS, and (R_p)-cAMPS on the kinetics of R-C binding and the time-resolved anisotropy of the reporter group at each conjugation site were measured. For the amide exchange experiments, ESI-TOF mass spectrometry with pepsin proteolytic fragmentation was used to assess the effects of (R_p)-cAMPS on amide exchange of the RIα(91–244)·C-subunit complex. We found that cAMP and its mimic perturbed at least parts of the C-subunit interaction Sites 2 and 3 but probably not Site 1 via reduced interactions of the linker region and αC of RIα(91–244). Surprisingly, (R_p)-cAMPS not only increased the affinity of RIα(91–244) toward the C-subunit by 5-fold but also produced long range effects that propagated through both the C- and R-subunits to produce limited unfolding and/or enhanced conformational flexibility. This combination of effects is consistent with (R_p)-cAMPS acting by enhancing the internal entropy of the R·C complex. Finally, the (R_p)-cAMPS-induced increase in affinity of RIα(91–244) toward the C-subunit indicates that (R_p)-cAMPS is better described as an inverse agonist because it decreases the fractional dissociation of the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase holoenzyme and in turn its basal activity.Cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA)¹ plays a crucial role in a plethora of cellular functions. All isoforms of PKA are composed of two catalytic (C) subunits and homodimeric regulatory (R) subunits (1–3). As the name implies, cAMP is a major PKA regulator (4). Much progress has been made in the last decade in delineating the molecular basis of action of cAMP. An important tactic in this endeavor has been through the comparison of the effects of cAMP with those of two phosphorothioate cAMP analogs: (S_p)-cAMPS (a cAMP mimic) and (R_p)-cAMPS (an antagonist and a diastereoisomer of (S_p)-cAMPS). Although the importance of geometry of the sulfur substitution is critical in determining the pharmacological properties of the two phosphorothioate cAMP analogs, the molecular basis for this behavior is not fully understood. To date, these comparisons have only been made using either wild-type or truncated mutants of the type Iα regulatory subunit (RIα) that are free in solution, not complexed to the C-subunit. X-ray spectroscopic examination of ligand-bound RIα(92–379) complexes reveals few differences between ligand-bound complexes, but the (R_p)-cAMPS complex is structurally “looser” with higher thermal factors than complexes formed with either cAMP or (S_p)-cAMPS (5). This is consistent with the observation that both cAMP and (S_p)-cAMPS, but not (R_p)-cAMPS, raise the urea concentration required for wild-type RIα unfolding (6). Further insight into the structural basis of cAMP action stems from NMR spectroscopic comparison of the effects of (R_p)-cAMPS, cAMP, and (S_p)-cAMPS on chemical shifts and ¹⁵N relaxation of the RIα(119–244) mutant (7). In addition to producing fewer significant chemical shift changes than either cAMP or (S_p)-cAMPS, (R_p)-cAMPS binding is associated with enhanced millisecond to microsecond time scale backbone motions of a β-turn (β2,3 loop) and around the phosphate-binding cassette (PBC) (7).Further insight into the molecular basis of actions of cAMP and its analogs should come from the analysis of ligand-bound R·C complexes. Unfortunately, the large size of even the heterodimeric R·C complex (∼95 kDa) and the difficulty of preparing (R_p)-cAMPS·R·C-subunit crystals currently preclude the use of both NMR spectroscopy and x-ray crystallography. Consequently, we took two alternative lower resolution approaches to this issue. One approach involves the use of site-directed labeling combined with fluorescence spectroscopy to examine both the effects of cAMP and its analogs on R-C subunit binding kinetics and on the conformational dynamics of RIα(91–244). RIα(91–244) includes the “A” cyclic nucleotide binding (CNB) domain, the pseudosubstrate, and linker domains and represents the minimal segments necessary for high affinity C-subunit binding (Fig. 1) (8). The other approach involves an examination of the effects of cAMP and its analogs on solvent exposure/conformational flexibility of RIα(91–244)·C-subunit complex using H/²H amide exchange measured with a combination of mass spectrometry (ESI-Q-TOF) and proteolytic fragmentation. In the first approach, fluorescein maleimide (FM) was conjugated to three cysteine substitution mutants with the substitution sites located near or within the pseudosubstrate sequence, the linker domain, or αC (R92C, T104C, and R239C, respectively) of RIα(91–244) (Fig. 1). The time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy results suggest that cAMP and (S_p)-cAMPS reduce the interaction of the RIα linker domain and αC with the two peripheral R-C interaction sites on the C-subunit (so-called Sites 2 and 3) without affecting the interaction of the pseudosubstrate sequence with the active site cleft (so-called Site 1). Because of limitations of the amide H/²H exchange experiments, only the effects of (R_p)-cAMPS on H/²H amide exchange in RIα(91–244)·C-subunit complex could be investigated. The results showed that (R_p)-cAMPS induces a relatively widespread increase in amide exchange, indicating limited unfolding and/or enhanced conformational flexibility that is propagated almost globally through the C-subunit and, at least, part of RIα. These conformational changes were accompanied by a 5-fold increase in the affinity of RIα(91–244) toward C-subunit, suggesting that, at least, some of the (R_p)-cAMPS effects are mediated by an increase in internal entropy. Finally, the (R_p)-cAMPS-induced increase in R-C affinity indicates that (R_p)-cAMPS is better described as an inverse agonist because the basal activity of the PKA holoenzyme should be decreased by (R_p)-cAMPS.Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Overview of PKA structure and cAMP analogs. A, domain organization of RIα showing the domain boundaries of RIα(91–244) where the pseudosubstrate in green is connected to CNB-A domain in blue by a linker segment. B, structure of RIα(91–244) in the C-subunit-bound conformation (Protein Data Bank code 1U7E (23)) showing the pseudosubstrate in green, linker in yellow, and helical subdomain comprising helices αN, αA, αB, and αC in blue and β-subdomain in tan. The PBC is in red. C, structure of the C·RIα(91–244) holoenzyme showing the C-subunit in tan and RIα(91–244) in blue. Sites for introduction of cysteines by site-directed mutagenesis are represented by red circles. The cAMP binding site (PBC) is in red. D, structure of cAMP showing the 2′-OH group and 3′–5′ phosphodiester bond. The exocyclic oxygens upon replacement with sulfur atoms to generate the (S_p)-cAMPS and (R_p)-cAMPS diastereomers are highlighted.     

Stereo- and Regioselective Hydroxylation of α-Ionone by Streptomyces Strains

A total of 215 Streptomyces strains were screened for their capacity to regio- and stereoselectively hydroxylate β- and/or α-ionone to the respective 3-hydroxy derivatives. With β-ionone as the substrate, 15 strains showed little conversion to 4-hydroxy- and none showed conversion to the 3-hydroxy product as desired. Among these 15 Streptomyces strains, S. fradiae Tü 27, S. arenae Tü 495, S. griseus ATCC 13273, S. violaceoniger Tü 38, and S. antibioticus Tü 4 and Tü 46 converted α-ionone to 3-hydroxy-α-ionone with significantly higher hydroxylation activity compared to that of β-ionone. Hydroxylation of racemic α-ionone [(6R)-(−)/(6S)-(+)] resulted in the exclusive formation of only the two enantiomers (3R,6R)- and (3S,6S)-hydroxy-α-ionone. Thus, the enzymatic hydroxylation of α-ionone by the Streptomyces strains tested proceeds with both high regio- and stereoselectivity.Ionones and their derivatives are important intermediates in the metabolism of terpenoids, e.g., in carotenoid biosynthesis, and have been isolated from many sources (1a, 11). Compounds with a trimethylcyclohexane building block constitute essential aroma elements in many plant oils and thus have attracted the attention of the flavor and fragrance industry (3). Further, ionone derivatives, e.g., 3-hydroxy-β-ionone, could prove valuable intermediates for the chemoenzymatic synthesis of carotenoids, e.g., for astaxanthin and zeaxanthin (5).Microbial transformation of α- and/or β-ionone to a number of hydroxy and oxo derivatives has been reported for several fungal strains (2, 4, 8, 9, 18), mainly of the genus Aspergillus, but not for bacterial strains. 3-Hydroxy-α-ionone was observed, among other metabolites, when Cunninghamella blakesleeana ATCC 8688 (2) or Aspergillus niger JTS 191 (18) was used.Many species of the order Actinomycetes are known to catalyze a broad spectrum of xenobiotic transformations. Several cytochrome P-450-dependent monooxygenases from Streptomyces strains, which catalyze the hydroxylation of a wide range of substrates, have been investigated on the molecular level (12) and thus provide an interesting potential as biocatalysts for specific hydroxylation reactions by recombinant techniques.As a first step in this direction, we now report the screening of 215 Streptomyces strains for their capacity to hydroxylate β- and/or α-ionone to the respective 3-hydroxy derivatives in a regio- and stereoselective manner. The structure and stereochemistry of the main biotransformation product were characterized unequivocally by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.     

Transformation of menthane monoterpenes by Mentha piperita cell culture

(+)-Isopiperitenone (100 mg l^–1) was converted into (4S,6R)-6-hydroxy- and (4S,8R)-8,9-epoxyisopiperitenone, aside from the already known (+)-7-hydroxyisopiperitenone, by suspension cell culture of Mentha piperita. As (–)-isopiperitenone was hydroxylated similarly, this implies that the hydroxylating enzyme(s) have a broad substrate stereospecificity in regards to the stereochemistry at C4. (–)-(4R)-Carvone was reduced by the Mentha cells both at carbonyl and C1-C6 double bond to give (1R,2S,4R)-neodihydrocarveol and (1R,2R,4R)-dihydrocarveol with the former being the major product. (+)-(4S)-Carvone had a similar reduction pattern, producing (1S,2R,4S)-neodihydrocarveol and (1S,4S)-dihydrocarvone. Formation of these compounds indicates that the peppermint cell culture cannot only hydroxylate the allylic position but also reduce the ,-unsaturated carbonyl system.     

Eremophilane-type sesquiterpene lactones from Ligularia hodgsonii Hook

A dimeric eremophilane sesquiterpene lactone with a cyclobutane ring, biliguhodgsonolide (1) and an uncommon seco-sesquiterpene derivative, (4S,5S,6R,10R)-8,9-seco-12-hydroxyeremophil-7(11)-en-14,6;12,8-diolid-9-al (2), were isolated from the roots and rhizomes of Ligularia hodgsonii Hook. Their structures, including the absolute stereochemistry, were elucidated by spectroscopic data and CD analysis. The cyclobutane ring was confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Absolute configuration of norcoronatine

Norcoronamic acid was established as having the absolute stereochemistry (1S,2S)-2-methyl-1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid by comparison of its properties with synthetic preparations of the (1R,2R), (1R,2S) and (1S,2R) stereoisomers.     

Cell Wall β-(1,6)-Glucan of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: STRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION AND IN SITU SYNTHESIS*S?

Despite its essential role in the yeast cell wall, the exact composition of the β-(1,6)-glucan component is not well characterized. While solubilizing the cell wall alkali-insoluble fraction from a wild type strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a recombinant β-(1,3)-glucanase followed by chromatographic characterization of the digest on an anion exchange column, we observed a soluble polymer that eluted at the end of the solvent gradient run. Further characterization indicated this soluble polymer to have a molecular mass of ∼38 kDa and could be hydrolyzed only by β-(1,6)-glucanase. Gas chromatographymass spectrometry and NMR (¹H and ¹³C) analyses confirmed it to be a β-(1,6)-glucan polymer with, on average, branching at every fifth residue with one or two β-(1,3)-linked glucose units in the side chain. This polymer peak was significantly reduced in the corresponding digests from mutants of the kre genes (kre9 and kre5) that are known to play a crucial role in the β-(1,6)-glucan biosynthesis. In the current study, we have developed a biochemical assay wherein incubation of UDP-[¹⁴C]glucose with permeabilized S. cerevisiae yeasts resulted in the synthesis of a polymer chemically identical to the branched β-(1,6)-glucan isolated from the cell wall. Using this assay, parameters essential for β-(1,6)-glucan synthetic activity were defined.The cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other yeasts contains two types of β-glucans. In the former yeast, branched β-(1,3)-glucan accounts for ∼50–55%, whereas β-(1,6)-glucan represents 10–15% of the total yeast cell wall polysaccharides, each chain of the latter extending up to 140–350 glucose residues in length. The amount of 3,6-branched glucose residues varies with the yeast species: 7, 15, and 75% in S. cerevisiae, Candida albicans, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, respectively (1). β-(1,6)-Glucan stabilizes the cell wall, since it plays a central role as a linker for specific cell wall components, including β-(1,3)-glucan, chitin, and mannoproteins (2, 3). However, the exact structure of the β-(1,6)-glucan and the mode of biosynthesis of this polymer are largely unknown. In S. pombe, immunodetection studies suggested that synthesis of this polymer backbone begins in the endoplasmic reticulum, with extension occurring in the Golgi (4) and final processing at the plasma membrane. In S. cerevisiae, Montijn and co-workers (5), by immunogold labeling, detected β-(1,6)-glucan at the plasma membrane, suggesting that the synthesis takes place largely at the cell surface.More than 20 genes, including the KRE gene family (14 members) and their homologues, SKN1 and KNH1, have been reported to be involved in β-(1,6)-glucan synthesis in S. cerevisiae, C. albicans, and Candida glabrata (6–10). Among all of these genes, the ones that seem to play the major synthetic role are KRE5 and KRE9, since their disruption caused significant reduction (100 and 80%, respectively, relative to wild type) in the cell wall β-(1,6)-glucan content (11–13).To date, the biochemical reaction responsible for the synthesis of β-(1,6)-glucan and the product synthesized remained unknown. Indeed, in most cases, when membrane preparations are incubated with UDP-glucose, only linear β-(1,3)-glucan polymers are produced, although some studies have reported the production of low amounts of β-(1,6)-glucans by membrane preparations (14–17). These data suggest that disruption of the fungal cell prevents or at least has a strong negative effect on β-(1,6)-glucan synthesis. The use of permeabilized cells, which allows substrates, such as nucleotide sugar precursors, to be readily transported across the plasma membrane, is an alternative method to study in situ cell wall enzyme activities (18–22). A number of methods have been developed to permeabilize the yeast cell wall (23), of which osmotic shock was successfully used to demonstrate β-(1,3)-glucan and chitin synthase activities (20, 24). Herein, we describe the biochemical activity responsible for β-(1,6)-glucan synthesis using permeabilized S. cerevisiae cells and UDP-[¹⁴C]glucose as a substrate. We also have analyzed the physicochemical parameters of this activity and chemically characterized the end product and its structural organization within the mature yeast cell wall.     

S-Palmitoylation of ��-Secretase Subunits Nicastrin and APH-1

Proteolytic processing of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β- and γ-secretases generates β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides, which accumulate in the brains of individuals affected by Alzheimer disease. Detergent-resistant membrane microdomains (DRM) rich in cholesterol and sphingolipid, termed lipid rafts, have been implicated in Aβ production. Previously, we and others reported that the four integral subunits of the γ-secretase associate with DRM. In this study we investigated the mechanisms underlying DRM association of γ-secretase subunits. We report that in cultured cells and in brain the γ-secretase subunits nicastrin and APH-1 undergo S-palmitoylation, the post-translational covalent attachment of the long chain fatty acid palmitate common in lipid raft-associated proteins. By mutagenesis we show that nicastrin is S-palmitoylated at Cys⁶⁸⁹, and APH-1 is S-palmitoylated at Cys¹⁸² and Cys²⁴⁵. S-Palmitoylation-defective nicastrin and APH-1 form stable γ-secretase complexes when expressed in knock-out fibroblasts lacking wild type subunits, suggesting that S-palmitoylation is not essential for γ-secretase assembly. Nevertheless, fractionation studies show that S-palmitoylation contributes to DRM association of nicastrin and APH-1. Moreover, pulse-chase analyses reveal that S-palmitoylation is important for nascent polypeptide stability of both proteins. Co-expression of S-palmitoylation-deficient nicastrin and APH-1 in cultured cells neither affects Aβ40, Aβ42, and AICD production, nor intramembrane processing of Notch and N-cadherin. Our findings suggest that S-palmitoylation plays a role in stability and raft localization of nicastrin and APH-1, but does not directly modulate γ-secretase processing of APP and other substrates.Alzheimer disease is the most common among neurodegenerative diseases that cause dementia. This debilitating disorder is pathologically characterized by the cerebral deposition of 39–42 amino acid peptides termed Aβ, which are generated by proteolytic processing of amyloid precursor protein (APP)² by β- and γ-secretases (1, 2). The β-site APP cleavage enzyme 1 cleaves full-length APP within its luminal domain to generate a secreted ectodomain leaving behind a C-terminal fragment (β-CTF). γ-Secretase cleaves β-CTF within the transmembrane domain to release Aβ and APP intracellular C-terminal domain (AICD). γ-Secretase is a multiprotein complex, comprising at least four subunits: presenilins (PS1 and PS2), nicastrin, APH-1, and PEN-2 for its activity (3). PS1 is synthesized as a 42–43-kDa polypeptide and undergoes highly regulated endoproteolytic processing within the large cytoplasmic loop domain connecting putative transmembrane segments 6 and 7 to generate stable N-terminal (NTF) and C-terminal fragments (CTF) by an uncharacterized proteolytic activity (4). This endoproteolytic event has been identified as the activation step in the process of PS1 maturation as it assembles with other γ-secretase subunits (3). Nicastrin is a heavily glycosylated type I membrane protein with a large ectodomain that has been proposed to function in substrate recognition and binding (5), but this putative function has not been confirmed by others (6). APH-1 is a seven-transmembrane protein encoded by two human or three rodent genes that are alternatively spliced (7). Although PS1 (or PS2), nicastrin, APH-1, and PEN-2 are sufficient for γ-secretase processing of APP, a type I membrane protein, termed p23 (also referred toTMP21), was recently identified as a γ-secretase component that modulates γ-secretase activity and regulates secretory trafficking of APP (8, 9).A growing number of type I integral membrane proteins has been identified as γ-secretase substrates within the last few years, including Notch1 homologues, Notch ligands, Delta and Jagged, cell adhesion receptors N- and E-cadherins, low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, ErbB-4, netrin receptor DCC, and others (10). Mounting evidence suggests that APP processing occurs within cholesterol- and sphingolipid-enriched lipid rafts, which are biochemically defined as detergentresistant membrane microdomains (DRM) (11, 12). Previously we reported that each of the γ-secretase subunits localizes in lipid rafts in post-Golgi and endosome membranes enriched in syntaxin 6 (13). Moreover, loss of γ-secretase activity by gene deletion or exposure to γ-secretase inhibitors results in the accumulation of APP CTFs in lipid rafts indicating that cleavage of APP CTFs likely occurs in raft microdomains (14). In contrast, CTFs derived from Notch1, Jagged2, N-cadherin, and DCC are processed by γ-secretase in non-raft membranes (14). The mechanisms underlying association of γ-secretase subunits with lipid rafts need further clarification to elucidate spatial segregation of amyloidogenic processing of APP in membrane microdomains.Post-translational S-palmitoylation is increasingly recognized as a potential mechanism for regulating raft association, stability, intracellular trafficking, and function of several cytosolic and transmembrane proteins (15–17). S-palmitoylation refers to the addition of 16-carbon palmitoyl moiety to certain cysteine residues through thioester linkage. Cysteines close to transmembrane domains or membrane-associated domains in non-integral membrane proteins are preferred S-palmitoylation sites, although no conserved motif has been identified (18). Palmitoylation modifies numerous neuronal proteins, including postsynaptic density protein PSD-95 (19), a-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptors (20), nicotinic α7 receptors (21), neuronal t-SNAREs SNAP-25, synaptobrevin 2 and synaptogagmin (22, 23), neuronal growth-associated protein GAP-43 (24), protein kinase CLICK-III (CL3)/CaMKIγ (25), β-secretase (26), and Huntingtin (27). Although palmitoylation can occur in vitro without the involvement of an enzyme, a family of palmitoyltransferases that specifically catalyze S-palmitoylation has been identified (28, 29).In this study, we have identified S-palmitoylation of γ-secretase subunits nicastrin and APH-1, and characterized its role on DRM association, protein stability, and γ-secretase enzyme activities. We show that nicastrin is S-palmitoylated at Cys⁶⁸⁹, and APH-1 at Cys¹⁸² and Cys²⁴⁵. Mutagenesis of palmitoylation sites results in increased degradation of nascent nicastrin and APH-1 polypeptides and reduced association with DRM. Nevertheless, in cultured cells overexpression of S-palmitoylation-deficient nicastrin and APH-1 does not modulate γ-secretase processing of APP or other substrates.     

Stereoselectivity of sodium borohydride reduction of saturated steroidal ketones utilizing conditions of Luche reduction

A series of keto steroids were reduced with sodium borohydride in the presence of cerium(III) chloride or samarium(III) iodide (Luche reduction). The ratios of axial and equatorial alcohols were determined by HPLC and the results were compared with those obtained by a standard sodium borohydride reduction. The best results were obtained with the 2-keto derivative 1, 7-keto derivatives 5 and 6, and 12-keto derivative 8 where the cerium(III) ion addition resulted in the inversion of the axial/equatorial ratios. The Luche reduction of the 20-keto derivative 11 improved the proportion of the (20S)-alcohol in a mixture of (20S)/(20R) alcohols up to 35% from 5% in a standard sodium borohydride reduction.     

Leucine/Valine Residues Direct Oxygenation of Linoleic Acid by (10R)- and (8R)-Dioxygenases: EXPRESSION AND SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS OF (10R)-DIOXYGENASE WITH EPOXYALCOHOL SYNTHASE ACTIVITY*S?

Linoleate (10R)-dioxygenase (10R-DOX) of Aspergillus fumigatus was cloned and expressed in insect cells. Recombinant 10R-DOX oxidized 18:2n-6 to (10R)-hydroperoxy-8(E),12(Z)-octadecadienoic acid (10R-HPODE; ∼90%), (8R)-hydroperoxylinoleic acid (8R-HPODE; ∼10%), and small amounts of 12S(13R)-epoxy-(10R)-hydroxy-(8E)-octadecenoic acid. We investigated the oxygenation of 18:2n-6 at C-10 and C-8 by site-directed mutagenesis of 10R-DOX and 7,8-linoleate diol synthase (7,8-LDS), which forms ∼98% 8R-HPODE and ∼2% 10R-HPODE. The 10R-DOX and 7,8-LDS sequences differ in homologous positions of the presumed dioxygenation sites (Leu-384/Val-330 and Val-388/Leu-334, respectively) and at the distal site of the heme (Leu-306/Val-256). Leu-384/Val-330 influenced oxygenation, as L384V and L384A of 10R-DOX elevated the biosynthesis of 8-HPODE to 22 and 54%, respectively, as measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis. The stereospecificity was also decreased, as L384A formed the R and S isomers of 10-HPODE and 8-HPODE in a 3:2 ratio. Residues in this position also influenced oxygenation by 7,8-LDS, as its V330L mutant augmented the formation of 10R-HPODE 3-fold. Replacement of Val-388 in 10R-DOX with leucine and phenylalanine increased the formation of 8R-HPODE to 16 and 36%, respectively, whereas L334V of 7,8-LDS was inactive. Mutation of Leu-306 with valine or alanine had little influence on the epoxyalcohol synthase activity. Our results suggest that Leu-384 and Val-388 of 10R-DOX control oxygenation of 18:2n-6 at C-10 and C-8, respectively. The two homologous positions of prostaglandin H synthase-1, Val-349 and Ser-353, are also critical for the position and stereospecificity of the cyclooxygenase reaction.Linoleate diol synthases (LDS)² and linoleate 10R-DOX are fungal fatty acid dioxygenases of the myeloperoxidase gene family (1-3). LDS have dual enzyme activities and transform 18:2n-6 sequentially to 8R-HPODE in an 8R-dioxygenase reaction and to 5,8-, 7,8-, or 8,11-DiHODE in hydroperoxide isomerase reactions. These oxylipins affect sporulation, development, and pathogenicity of Aspergilli (4-6). Fatty acid dioxygenases of the myeloperoxidase gene family also occur in vertebrates, plants, and algae (7-9). The most thoroughly investigated vertebrate enzymes are ovine PGHS-1 and mouse PGHS-2 with known crystal structures (10-12). PGHS transforms 20:4n-6 to PGG₂ in a cyclooxygenase and PGG₂ to PGH₂ in a peroxidase reaction. Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit the cyclooxygenase reaction. This is of paramount medical importance (13, 14), and PGHS-1 and -2 are commonly known as COX-1 and -2 (15). α-DOX occur in plants and algae, and biosynthesis of α-DOX in plants is elicited by pathogens (7). α-DOX oxidizes fatty acids to unstable (2R)-hydroperoxides, which readily break down nonenzymatically to fatty acid aldehydes and CO₂ (7).LDS, 10R-DOX, PGHS, and α-DOX oxygenate fatty acids to different products, but their oxygenation mechanisms have mechanistic similarities. Sequence alignment shows that many critical amino acid residues for the cyclooxygenase reaction are conserved in LDS, 10R-DOX, and α-DOX. These include the proximal histidine heme ligand, the distal histidine, and the catalytic important tyrosine (Tyr-385) of PGHS-1. The latter is oxidized to a tyrosyl radical, which initiates the cyclooxygenase reaction by abstraction of the pro-S hydrogen at C-13 of 20:4n-6 (16). In analogy, LDS and 10R-DOX catalyze stereospecific abstraction of the pro-S hydrogen at C-8 of 18:2n-6 (3), whereas α-DOX abstracts the pro-R hydrogen at C-2 of fatty acids (17). Site-directed mutagenesis of the conserved tyrosine homologues of Tyr-385 and proximal heme ligands abolishes the dioxygenase activities of 7,8-LDS and α-DOX (17, 18). The orientation of the substrate at the dioxygenation site differs. The carboxyl groups of fatty acids are positioned in a hydrophobic grove close to the tyrosine residue of α-DOX (19). In contrast, the ω ends of eicosanoic fatty acids are buried deep inside the cyclooxygenase channel so that C-13 lies in the vicinity of Tyr-385 (20). Several observations suggest that 18:2n-6 may also be positioned with its ω end embedded in the interior of 7,8-LDS of Gaeumannomyces graminis (18).7,8-LDS of G. graminis and Magnaporthe grisea and 5,8-LDS of Aspergillus nidulans have been sequenced (5, 8, 21). Gene targeting revealed the catalytic properties of 5,8-LDS, 8,11-LDS, and 10R-DOX in Aspergillus fumigatus and A. nidulans (3). Homologous genes can be found in other Aspergilli spp. Alignment of the two 7,8-LDS amino acid sequences with 5,8-LDS, 8,11-LDS, and 10R-DOX sequences of five Aspergilli revealed several conserved regions with single amino acid differences between the enzymes with 8R-DOX and 10R-DOX activities, as illustrated by the selected sequences in Fig. 1. Leu-306, Leu-384, and Val-388 of 10R-DOX are replaced in 5,8- and 7,8-LDS by valine, valine, and leucine residues, respectively. Whether these amino acids are important for the oxygenation mechanism is unknown, and this is one topic of the present investigation. The predicted secondary structure of 10R-DOX suggests that Leu-384 of 10R-DOX can be present in an α-helix with Val-388 close to its border. This α-helix is homologous to helix 6 of PGHS-1, which contains Val-349 and Ser-353 at the homologous positions of Leu-384 and Val-388 (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Alignments of partial amino acid sequences of five heme containing fatty acid dioxgenases and a comparison of the predicted secondary structure of 10R-DOX with ovine PGHS-1. A, top, amino acids residues at the presumed peroxidase and hydroperoxide isomerase sites. The last two residues, His and Asn, are conserved in all myeloperoxidases (1). Middle and bottom, amino acid residues of the presumed dioxygenation sites are shown. Conserved residues in all sequences are in boldface, and mutated residues of 10R-DOX and/or 7,8-LDS are marked by an asterisk. B, alignment of partial amino acid sequences of 10R-DOX with ovine PGHS-1, and a secondary structure prediction of the 10R-DOX sequence. The secondary structure of 10R-DOX was predicted by PSIPRED (43) and the secondary structure of ovine PGHS-1 from its crystal structure (Protein Data Bank code 1diy; cf. Ref 19). In short, our first strategy for site-directed mutagenesis was to switch hydrophobic residues between the enzymes with 10R- and 8R-DOX activities and to assess the effects on the DOX and hydroperoxide isomerase activities (10R-DOX/7,8-LDS: Leu-306/Val-256, Leu-384/Val-330, Val-388/Leu-334, and Ala-426/Ile-375) and to switch one hydrophobic/charged residue (Ala-435/Glu-384). Only catalytically active pairs would provide clear information on their importance for the position of dioxygenation (e.g. L384V of 10R-DOX and V330L of 7,8-LDS, both of which were active). Unfortunately, replacements of 7,8-LDS often led to inactivation or very low activity (e.g. V330A, V330M, I375A, E384A). Our second strategy was to study replacements in two homologous positions of ovine PGHS-1 (Val-349 and Ser-353) with smaller and larger hydrophobic residues, i.e. at Leu-384 and Val-388 of 10R-DOX. Abbreviations used are as follows: oCOX-1, ovine cyclooxygenase-1; Af, A. fumigatus; Gg, G. graminis. The GenBank™ protein sequences were derived from {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"P05979","term_id":"754286265","term_text":"P05979"}}P05979, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"EAL89712","term_id":"66849384","term_text":"EAL89712"}}EAL89712, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"AAD49559","term_id":"258406875","term_text":"AAD49559"}}AAD49559, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"EAL84400","term_id":"129555261","term_text":"EAL84400"}}EAL84400, and {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ACL14177","term_id":"219382647","term_text":"ACL14177"}}ACL14177. The amino acid sequences were aligned with the ClustalW algorithm (DNAStar).The overall three-dimensional structures of myeloperoxidases are conserved. It is therefore conceivable that important residues for substrate binding in the cyclooxygenase channel of PGHS could be conserved in LDS and 10R-DOX. The three-dimensional structure of ovine PGHS-1 shows that Val-349 and Ser-353 are close to C-3 and C-4 of 20:4n-6, and residues in these positions can alter both position and stereospecificity of oxygenation (22-24). Replacement of Val-349 of PGHS-1 with alanine increased the biosynthesis of 11R-HETE, whereas V349L decreased the generation of 11R-H(P)ETE and increased formation of 15(R/S)-H(P)ETE (23, 25). V349I formed PGG₂ with 15R configuration (22, 24). Replacement of Ser-353 with threonine reduced cyclooxygenase and peroxidase activities by over 50% and increased the biosynthesis of 11R-HPETE and 15S-HPETE 4-5 times (23).There is little information on the hydroperoxide isomerase and peroxidase sites of LDS (18, 26), but the latter could be structurally related to the peroxidase site of PGHS. PGG₂ and presumably 8R-HPODE bind to the distal side of the heme group, which can be delineated by hydrophobic amino acid residues (27). Val-291 is one of these residues, which form a dome over the distal heme side of COX-1. The V291A mutant retained cyclooxygenase and peroxidase activities (27). 5,8- and 7,8-LDS also have valine residues in the homologous position, whereas 8,11-LDS and 10R-DOX have leucine residues (Fig. 1). Whether these hydrophobic residues are important for the peroxidase activities is unknown.In this study we decided to compare the two catalytic sites of 10R-DOX of A. fumigatus and 7,8-LDS (EC 1.13.11.44) of G. graminis (18). Our first aim was to find a robust expression system for 10R-DOX of A. fumigatus. The second objective was to determine whether C₁₆ and C₂₀ fatty acid substrates enter the oxygenation site of 10R-DOX “head” or “tail” first. Unexpectedly, we found that 10R-DOX oxygenated 20:4n-6 by hydrogen abstraction at both C-13 and C-10 with formation of two nonconjugated and four cis-trans-conjugated HPETEs. Our third objective was to investigate the structural differences between 10R-DOX and 7,8-LDS of G. graminis, which could explain that oxygenation of 18:2n-6 mainly occurred at C-10 and at C-8, respectively. The strategy for site-directed mutagenesis of 10R-DOX and 7,8-LDS is outlined in the legend to Fig. 1; an alignment of the amino acid sequences of 10R-DOX and 7,8-LDS is found in supplemental material.     

Proper Restoration of Excitation-Contraction Coupling in the Dihydropyridine Receptor ��1-null Zebrafish Relaxed Is an Exclusive Function of the ��1a Subunit

The paralyzed zebrafish strain relaxed carries a null mutation for the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) β_1a subunit. Lack of β_1a results in (i) reduced membrane expression of the pore forming DHPR α_1S subunit, (ii) elimination of α_1S charge movement, and (iii) impediment of arrangement of the DHPRs in groups of four (tetrads) opposing the ryanodine receptor (RyR1), a structural prerequisite for skeletal muscle-type excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. In this study we used relaxed larvae and isolated myotubes as expression systems to discriminate specific functions of β_1a from rather general functions of β isoforms. Zebrafish and mammalian β_1a subunits quantitatively restored α_1S triad targeting and charge movement as well as intracellular Ca²⁺ release, allowed arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads, and most strikingly recovered a fully motile phenotype in relaxed larvae. Interestingly, the cardiac/neuronal β_2a as the phylogenetically closest, and the ancestral housefly β_M as the most distant isoform to β_1a also completely recovered α_1S triad expression and charge movement. However, both revealed drastically impaired intracellular Ca²⁺ transients and very limited tetrad formation compared with β_1a. Consequently, larval motility was either only partially restored (β_2a-injected larvae) or not restored at all (β_M). Thus, our results indicate that triad expression and facilitation of 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) charge movement are common features of all tested β subunits, whereas the efficient arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads and thus intact DHPR-RyR1 coupling is only promoted by the β_1a isoform. Consequently, we postulate a model that presents β_1a as an allosteric modifier of α_1S conformation enabling skeletal muscle-type EC coupling.Excitation-contraction (EC)³ coupling in skeletal muscle is critically dependent on the close interaction of two distinct Ca²⁺ channels. Membrane depolarizations of the myotube are sensed by the voltage-dependent 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the sarcolemma, leading to a rearrangement of charged amino acids (charge movement) in the transmembrane segments S4 of the pore-forming DHPR α_1S subunit (1, 2). This conformational change induces via protein-protein interaction (3, 4) the opening of the sarcoplasmic type-1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) without need of Ca²⁺ influx through the DHPR (5). The release of Ca²⁺ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum via RyR1 consequently induces muscle contraction. The protein-protein interaction mechanism between DHPR and RyR1 requires correct ultrastructural targeting of both channels. In Ca²⁺ release units (triads and peripheral couplings) of the skeletal muscle, groups of four DHPRs (tetrads) are coupled to every other RyR1 and hence are geometrically arranged following the RyR-specific orthogonal arrays (6).The skeletal muscle DHPR is a heteromultimeric protein complex, composed of the voltage-sensing and pore-forming α_1S subunit and auxiliary subunits β_1a, α₂δ-1, and γ₁ (7). While gene knock-out of the DHPR γ₁ subunit (8, 9) and small interfering RNA knockdown of the DHPR α₂δ-1 subunit (10-12) have indicated that neither subunit is essential for coupling of the DHPR with RyR1, the lack of the α_1S or of the intracellular β_1a subunit is incompatible with EC coupling and accordingly null model mice die perinatally due to asphyxia (13, 14). β subunits of voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels were repeatedly shown to be responsible for the facilitation of α₁ membrane insertion and to be potent modulators of α₁ current kinetics and voltage dependence (15, 16). Whether the loss of EC coupling in β₁-null mice was caused by decreased DHPR membrane expression or by the lack of a putative specific contribution of the β subunit to the skeletal muscle EC coupling apparatus (17, 18) was not clearly resolved. Recently, other β-functions were identified in skeletal muscle using the β₁-null mutant zebrafish relaxed (19, 20). Like the β₁-knock-out mouse (14) zebrafish relaxed is characterized by complete paralysis of skeletal muscle (21, 22). While β₁-knock-out mouse pups die immediately after birth due to respiratory paralysis (14), larvae of relaxed are able to survive for several days because of oxygen and metabolite diffusion via the skin (23). Using highly differentiated myotubes that are easy to isolate from these larvae, the lack of EC coupling could be described by quantitative immunocytochemistry as a moderate ∼50% reduction of α_1S membrane expression although α_1S charge movement was nearly absent, and, most strikingly, as the complete lack of the arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads (19). Thus, in skeletal muscle the β subunit enables EC coupling by (i) enhancing α_1S membrane targeting, (ii) facilitating α_1S charge movement, and (iii) enabling the ultrastructural arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads.The question arises, which of these functions are specific for the skeletal muscle β_1a and which ones are rather general properties of Ca²⁺ channel β subunits. Previous reconstitution studies made in the β₁-null mouse system (24, 25) using different β subunit constructs (26) did not allow differentiation between β-induced enhancement of non-functional α_1S membrane expression and the facilitation of α_1S charge movement, due to the lack of information on α_1S triad expression levels. Furthermore, the β-induced arrangement of DHPRs in tetrads was not detected as no ultrastructural information was obtained.In the present study, we established zebrafish mutant relaxed as an expression system to test different β subunits for their ability to restore skeletal muscle EC coupling. Using isolated myotubes for in vitro experiments (19, 27) and complete larvae for in vivo expression studies (28-31) and freeze-fracture electron microscopy, a clear differentiation between the major functional roles of β subunits was feasible in the zebrafish system. The cloned zebrafish β_1a and a mammalian (rabbit) β_1a were shown to completely restore all parameters of EC coupling when expressed in relaxed myotubes and larvae. However, the phylogenetically closest β subunit to β_1a, the cardiac/neuronal isoform β_2a from rat, as well as the ancestral β_M isoform from the housefly (Musca domestica), could recover functional α_1S membrane insertion, but led to very restricted tetrad formation when compared with β_1a, and thus to impaired DHPR-RyR1 coupling. This impairment caused drastic changes in skeletal muscle function.The present study shows that the enhancement of functional α_1S membrane expression is a common function of all the tested β subunits, from β_1a to even the most distant β_M, whereas the effective formation of tetrads and thus proper skeletal muscle EC coupling is an exclusive function of the skeletal muscle β_1a subunit. In context with previous studies, our results suggest a model according to which β_1a acts as an allosteric modifier of α_1S conformation. Only in the presence of β_1a, the α_1S subunit is properly folded to allow RyR1 anchoring and thus skeletal muscle-type EC coupling.     

Alzheimer Disease A�� Production in the Absence of S-Palmitoylation-dependent Targeting of BACE1 to Lipid Rafts

Alzheimer disease β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides are generated via sequential proteolysis of amyloid precursor protein (APP) by BACE1 and γ-secretase. A subset of BACE1 localizes to cholesterol-rich membrane microdomains, termed lipid rafts. BACE1 processing in raft microdomains of cultured cells and neurons was characterized in previous studies by disrupting the integrity of lipid rafts by cholesterol depletion. These studies found either inhibition or elevation of Aβ production depending on the extent of cholesterol depletion, generating controversy. The intricate interplay between cholesterol levels, APP trafficking, and BACE1 processing is not clearly understood because cholesterol depletion has pleiotropic effects on Golgi morphology, vesicular trafficking, and membrane bulk fluidity. In this study, we used an alternate strategy to explore the function of BACE1 in membrane microdomains without altering the cellular cholesterol level. We demonstrate that BACE1 undergoes S-palmitoylation at four Cys residues at the junction of transmembrane and cytosolic domains, and Ala substitution at these four residues is sufficient to displace BACE1 from lipid rafts. Analysis of wild type and mutant BACE1 expressed in BACE1 null fibroblasts and neuroblastoma cells revealed that S-palmitoylation neither contributes to protein stability nor subcellular localization of BACE1. Surprisingly, non-raft localization of palmitoylation-deficient BACE1 did not have discernible influence on BACE1 processing of APP or secretion of Aβ. These results indicate that post-translational S-palmitoylation of BACE1 is not required for APP processing, and that BACE1 can efficiently cleave APP in both raft and non-raft microdomains.Alzheimer disease-associated β-amyloid (Aβ)³ peptides are derived from the sequential proteolysis of β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) by β- and γ-secretases. The major β-secretase is an aspartyl protease, termed BACE1 (β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1) (1–4). BACE1 cleaves APP within the extracellular domain of APP, generating the N terminus of Aβ. In addition, BACE1 also cleaves to a lesser extent within the Aβ domain between Tyr¹⁰ and Glu¹¹ (β′-cleavage site). Processing of APP at these sites results in the shedding/secretion of the large ectodomain (sAPPβ) and generating membrane-tethered C-terminal fragments +1 and +11 (β-CTF) (5). The multimeric γ-secretase cleaves at multiple sites within the transmembrane domain of β-CTF, generating C-terminal heterogeneous Aβ peptides (ranging in length between 38 and 43 residues) that are secreted, as well as cytosolic APP intracellular domains (6). In addition to BACE1, APP can be cleaved by α-secretase within the Aβ domain between Lys¹⁶ and Leu¹⁷, releasing sAPPα and generating α-CTF. γ-Secretase cleavage of α-CTF generates N-terminal truncated Aβ, termed p3.Genetic ablation of BACE1 completely abolishes Aβ production, establishing BACE1 as the major neuronal enzyme responsible for initiating amyloidogenic processing of APP (4, 7). Interestingly, both the expression and activity of BACE1 is specifically elevated in neurons adjacent to senile plaques in brains of individuals with Alzheimer disease (8). In the past few years additional substrates of BACE1 have been identified that include APP homologues APLP1 and APLP2 (9), P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (10), β-galactoside α2,6-sialyltransferase (11), low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (12), β-subunits of voltage-gated sodium channels (13), and neuregulin-1 (14, 15), thus extending the physiological function of BACE1 beyond Alzheimer disease pathogenesis.BACE1 is a type I transmembrane protein with a long extracellular domain harboring a catalytic domain and a short cytoplasmic tail. BACE1 is synthesized as a proenzyme, which undergoes post-translational modifications that include removal of a pro-domain by a furin-like protease, N-glycosylation, phosphorylation, S-palmitoylation, and acetylation, during the transit in the secretory pathway (16–20). In non-neuronal cells the majority of BACE1 localizes to late Golgi/TGN and endosomes at steady-state and a fraction of BACE1 also cycles between the cell surface and endosomes (21). The steady-state localization of BACE1 is consistent with the acidic pH optimum of BACE1 in vitro, and BACE1 cleavage of APP is observed in the Golgi apparatus, TGN, and endosomes (22–25). BACE1 endocytosis and recycling are mediated by the GGA family of adaptors binding to a dileucine motif (⁴⁹⁶DISLL) in its cytoplasmic tail (21, 26–31). Phosphorylation at Ser⁴⁹⁸ within this motif modulates GGA-dependent retrograde transport of BACE1 from endosomes to TGN (21, 26–31).Over the years, a functional relationship between cellular cholesterol level and Aβ production has been uncovered, raising the intriguing possibility that cholesterol levels may determine the balance between amyloidogenic and non-amyloidogenic processing of APP (32–34). Furthermore, several lines of evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that cholesterol- and sphingolipid-rich membrane microdomains, termed lipid rafts, might be the critical link between cholesterol levels and amyloidogenic processing of APP. Lipid rafts function in the trafficking of proteins in the secretory and endocytic pathways in epithelial cells and neurons, and participate in a number of important biological functions (35). BACE1 undergoes S-palmitoylation (19), a reversible post-translational modification responsible for targeting a variety of peripheral and integral membrane proteins to lipid rafts (36). Indeed, a significant fraction of BACE1 is localized in lipid raft microdomains in a cholesterol-dependent manner, and addition of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor to target BACE1 exclusively to lipid rafts increases APP processing at the β-cleavage site (37, 38). Antibody-mediated co-patching of cell surface APP and BACE1 has provided further evidence for BACE1 processing of APP in raft microdomains (33, 39). Components of the γ-secretase complex also associate with detergent-resistant membrane (DRM) fractions enriched in raft markers such as caveolin, flotillin, PrP, and ganglioside GM1 (40). The above findings suggest a model whereby APP is sequentially processed by BACE1 and γ-secretase in lipid rafts.Despite the accumulating evidence, cleavage of APP by BACE1 in non-raft membrane regions cannot be unambiguously ruled out because of the paucity of full-length APP (APP FL) and BACE1 in DRM isolated from adult brain and cultured cells (41). Moreover, it was recently reported that moderate reduction of cholesterol (<25%) displaces BACE1 from raft domains, and increases BACE1 processing by promoting the membrane proximity of BACE1 and APP in non-raft domains (34). Nevertheless, this study also found that BACE1 processing of APP is inhibited with further loss of cholesterol (>35%), consistent with earlier studies (32, 33). Nevertheless, given the pleiotropic effects of cholesterol depletion on membrane properties and vesicular trafficking of secretory and endocytic proteins (42–47), unequivocal conclusions regarding BACE1 processing of APP in lipid rafts cannot be reached based on cholesterol depletion studies.In this study, we explored the function of BACE1 in lipid raft microdomains without manipulating cellular cholesterol levels. In addition to the previously reported S-palmitoylation sites (Cys⁴⁷⁸/Cys⁴⁸²/Cys⁴⁸⁵) within the cytosolic tail of BACE1 (19), we have identified a fourth site (Cys⁴⁷⁴) within the transmembrane domain of BACE1 that undergoes S-palmitoylation. A BACE1 mutant with Ala substitution of all four Cys residues (BACE1-4C/A) fails to associate with DRM in cultured cells, but is not otherwise different from wtBACE1 in terms of protein stability, maturation, or subcellular localization. Surprisingly, APP processing and Aβ generation were unaffected in cells stably expressing the BACE1-4C/A mutant. Finally, we observed an increase in the levels of APP CTFs in detergent-soluble fractions of BACE1-4C/A as compared with wtBACE1 cells. Thus, our data collectively indicate a non-obligatory role of S-palmitoylation and lipid raft localization of BACE1 in amyloidogenic processing of APP.     

Stereo- and Regioselective Hydroxylation of α-Ionone by Streptomyces Strains

A total of 215 Streptomyces strains were screened for their capacity to regio- and stereoselectively hydroxylate β- and/or α-ionone to the respective 3-hydroxy derivatives. With β-ionone as the substrate, 15 strains showed little conversion to 4-hydroxy- and none showed conversion to the 3-hydroxy product as desired. Among these 15 Streptomyces strains, S. fradiae Tü 27, S. arenae Tü 495, S. griseus ATCC 13273, S. violaceoniger Tü 38, and S. antibioticus Tü 4 and Tü 46 converted α-ionone to 3-hydroxy-α-ionone with significantly higher hydroxylation activity compared to that of β-ionone. Hydroxylation of racemic α-ionone [(6R)-(−)/(6S)-(+)] resulted in the exclusive formation of only the two enantiomers (3R,6R)- and (3S,6S)-hydroxy-α-ionone. Thus, the enzymatic hydroxylation of α-ionone by the Streptomyces strains tested proceeds with both high regio- and stereoselectivity.     

Anti-inflammatory components of the Vietnamese starfish Protoreaster nodosus

Background

In the present study, we examined the inhibitory effects of a methanolic extract, dichloromethane fraction, water layer, and polyhydroxylated sterols (1–4) isolated from the Vietnamese starfish Protoreaster nodosus on pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-12 p40, IL-6, and TNF-α) production in LPS-stimulated bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA).

Results

The methanolic extract and dichloromethane fraction exerted potent inhibitory effects on the production of all three pro-inflammatory cytokines, with IC₅₀ values ranging from 0.60 ± 0.01 to 26.19 ± 0.64 μg/mL. Four highly pure steroid derivatives (1–4) were isolated from the dichloromethane fraction and water layer of P. nodosus. Potent inhibitory activities were also observed for (25S) 5α-cholestane-3β,4β,6α,7α,8β,15α,16β,26-octol (3) on the production of IL-12 p40 and IL-6 (IC_50s = 3.11 ± 0.08 and 1.35 ± 0.03 μM), and for (25S) 5α-cholestane-3β,6α,8β,15α,16β,26-hexol (1) and (25S) 5α-cholestane-3β,6α,7α,8β,15α,16β,26-heptol (2) on the production of IL-12 p40 (IC_50s = 0.01 ± 0.00 and 1.02 ± 0.01 μM). Moreover, nodososide (4) exhibited moderate inhibitory effects on IL-12 p40 and IL-6 production.

Conclusion

This is the first report of the anti-inflammatory activity from the starfish P. nodosus. The main finding of this study is the identification oxygenated steroid derivatives from P. nodosus with potent anti-inflammatory activities that may be developed as therapeutic agents for inflammatory diseases.     

Enantioselective Transformation of α-Hexachlorocyclohexane by the Dehydrochlorinases LinA1 and LinA2 from the Soil Bacterium Sphingomonas paucimobilis B90A

Sphingomonas paucimobilis B90A contains two variants, LinA1 and LinA2, of a dehydrochlorinase that catalyzes the first and second steps in the metabolism of hexachlorocyclohexanes (R. Kumari, S. Subudhi, M. Suar, G. Dhingra, V. Raina, C. Dogra, S. Lal, J. R. van der Meer, C. Holliger, and R. Lal, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:6021-6028, 2002). On the amino acid level, LinA1 and LinA2 were 88% identical to each other, and LinA2 was 100% identical to LinA of S. paucimobilis UT26. Incubation of chiral α-hexachlorocyclohexane (α-HCH) with Escherichia coli BL21 expressing functional LinA1 and LinA2 S-glutathione transferase fusion proteins showed that LinA1 preferentially converted the (+) enantiomer, whereas LinA2 preferred the (−) enantiomer. Concurrent formation and subsequent dissipation of β-pentachlorocyclohexene enantiomers was also observed in these experiments, indicating that there was enantioselective formation and/or dissipation of these enantiomers. LinA1 preferentially formed (3S,4S,5R,6R)-1,3,4,5,6-pentachlorocyclohexene, and LinA2 preferentially formed (3R,4R,5S,6S)-1,3,4,5,6-pentachlorocyclohexene. Because enantioselectivity was not observed in incubations with whole cells of S. paucimobilis B90A, we concluded that LinA1 and LinA2 are equally active in this organism. The enantioselective transformation of chiral α-HCH by LinA1 and LinA2 provides the first evidence of the molecular basis for the changed enantiomer composition of α-HCH in many natural environments. Enantioselective degradation may be one of the key processes determining enantiomer composition, especially when strains that contain only one of the linA genes, such as S. paucimobilis UT26, prevail.     

Monoterpenoids from the aerial parts of Aruncus dioicus var. kamtschaticus and their antioxidant and cytotoxic activities

The aerial parts of Aruncus dioicus var. kamtschaticus afforded five new monoterpenoids (1-5): 4-(erythro-6,7-dihydroxy-9-methylpent-8-enyl)furan-2(5H)-one (1, aruncin A), 2-(8-ethoxy-8-methylpropylidene)-5-hydroxy-3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-4-carboxylic acid (2, aruncin B), 4-(hydroxymethyl)-6-(8-methylprop-7-enyl)-5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one-11-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (3, aruncide A), (3S,4S,5R,10R)-3-(10-ethoxy-11-hydroxyethyl)-4-(5-hydroxy-7-methylbut-6-enyl)oxetan-2-one-11-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (4, aruncide B), and (3S,4S,5R,7R)-5-(9-methylprop-8-enyl)-1,6-dioxabicyclo[3,2,0]heptan-2-one-7-(hydroxymethyl)-12-O-β-d-glucopyranoside (5, aruncide C). Compound 2 showed potent cytotoxicity against Jurkat T cells with an IC₅₀ value of 17.15 μg/mL. In addition, compounds 7 and 10 exhibited moderate antioxidant activity with IC₅₀ values of 46.3 and 11.7 μM, respectively.     

Effects of Differential Glycosylation of Glycodelins on Lymphocyte Survival

Glycodelin is a human glycoprotein with four reported glycoforms, namely glycodelin-A (GdA), glycodelin-F (GdF), glycodelin-C (GdC), and glycodelin-S (GdS). These glycoforms have the same protein core and appear to differ in their N-glycosylation. The glycosylation of GdA is completely different from that of GdS. GdA inhibits proliferation and induces cell death of T cells. However, the glycosylation and immunomodulating activities of GdF and GdC are not known. This study aimed to use ultra-high sensitivity mass spectrometry to compare the glycomes of GdA, GdC, and GdF and to study the relationship between the immunological activity and glycosylation pattern among glycodelin glycoforms. Using MALDI-TOF strategies, the glycoforms were shown to contain an enormous diversity of bi-, tri-, and tetra-antennary complex-type glycans carrying Galβ1–4GlcNAc (lacNAc) and/or GalNAcβ1–4GlcNAc (lacdiNAc) antennae backbones with varying levels of fucose and sialic acid substitution. Interestingly, they all carried a family of Sda (NeuAcα2–3(GalNAcβ1–4)Gal)-containing glycans, which were not identified in the earlier study because of less sensitive methodologies used. Among the three glycodelins, GdA is the most heavily sialylated. Virtually all the sialic acid on GdC is located on the Sda antennae. With the exception of the Sda epitope, the GdC N-glycome appears to be the asialylated counterpart of the GdA/GdF glycomes. Sialidase activity, which may be responsible for transforming GdA/GdF to GdC, was detected in cumulus cells. Both GdA and GdF inhibited the proliferation, induced cell death, and suppressed interleukin-2 secretion of Jurkat cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In contrast, no immunosuppressive effect was observed for GdS and GdC.Glycodelin is a member of the lipocalin family. It consists of 180 amino acid residues (1) with two sites of N-linked glycosylation. There are four reported glycodelin isoforms, namely glycodelin-A (amniotic fluid isoform, GdA),⁴ glycodelin-F (follicular fluid, GdF), glycodelin-C (cumulus matrix, GdC) and glycodelin-S (seminal plasma, GdS) (2–5). Among the four glycodelin isoforms, only the N-glycan structures of GdA and GdS have been previously determined. This was achieved using fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry (6, 7). The glycan structures of GdA and GdS are completely different. In GdA, the Asn-28 site carries high mannose, hybrid, and complex-type structures, whereas the second Asn-63 site is exclusively occupied by complex-type glycans (6). The major non-reducing epitopes characterized in the complex-type glycans are Galβ1–4GlcNAc (lacNAc), GalNAcβ1–4GlcNAc (lacdiNAc), NeuAcα2–6Galβ1–4GlcNAc (sialylated lacNAc), NeuAcα2–6GalNAcβ1–4GlcNAc (sialylated lacdiNAc), Galβ1–4(Fucα1–3)GlcNAc (Lewis-x), and GalNAcβ1–4(Fucα1–3)GlcNAc (lacdiNAc analog of the blood group substance Lewis-x) (6). Many of these oligosaccharides are rare in other human glycoproteins. GdS glycans are unusually fucose-rich, and the major complex type glycan structures are bi-antennary glycans with Lewis-x and Lewis-y antennae. Glycosylation of GdS is highly site-specific. Asn-28 contains only high mannose structures, whereas Asn-63 contains only complex type glycans. More than 80% of the complex glycans have 3–5 fucose residues/glycan, and none of the glycans is sialylated, which is unusual for a secreted human glycoprotein (7). The glycan structures of GdF and GdC are not known, although they differ in lectin-binding properties and isoelectric point from the other two glycodelin isoforms (5).Glycans are involved in various intracellular, intercellular, and cell-matrix recognition events (8, 9). Glycosylation determines the biological activities of the glycodelin isoforms (2, 10). For example, both GdA and GdF inhibit the spermatozoa-zona pellucida binding (11) via fucosyltransferase-5 (12), but only the latter inhibits progesterone-induced acrosome reaction, thus preventing a premature acrosome reaction of the spermatozoa. There is evidence that cumulus cells can convert exogenous GdA and -F to GdC, the physicochemical properties of which suggest that it is differently glycosylated compared with GdA/F (5). Moreover, GdC stimulated spermatozoa-zona pellucida binding in a dose-dependent manner, and it effectively displaced sperm-bound GdA and -F (4, 5). GdS suppresses capacitation probably via its inhibitory activity on cholesterol efflux from spermatozoa (13).Except for the effects on fertilization, GdA is involved in fetomaternal defense. This glycodelin isoform suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis of T cells (2) and inhibits natural killer cell (14) and B-cell (15) activities. Glycosylation is involved in the binding of GdA to receptors on T cells (16). The sialic acid of GdA contributes to the apoptotic activity in T cells (17, 18) and binding to CD45, a potential GdA receptor (16). The importance of glycosylation in glycodelin is further shown by the absence of immunosuppressive activities in GdS with different glycosylation (18). The immunomodulating activities of GdF and GdC are unknown.Our previous work showed that glycans are indispensable for the different glycodelins to exhibit their binding activities and biological effects (13, 19, 20). The present study aims to identify the effect of all four glycodelin isoforms on lymphocyte viability, cell death, and interleukin-2 (IL-2) secretion and to correlate these bioactivities with their glycosylation patterns determined by mass spectrometry.