Trafficking patterns of beta-arrestin and G protein-coupled receptors determined by the kinetics of beta-arrestin deubiquitination

Agonist-dependent internalization of G protein-coupled receptors via clathrin-coated pits is dependent on the adaptor protein beta-arrestin, which interacts with elements of the endocytic machinery such as AP2 and clathrin. For the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) this requires ubiquitination of beta-arrestin by E3 ubiquitin ligase, Mdm2. Based on trafficking patterns and affinity of beta-arrestin, G protein-coupled receptors are categorized into two classes. For class A receptors (e.g. beta(2)AR), which recycle rapidly, beta-arrestin directs the receptors to clathrin-coated pits but does not internalize with them. For class B receptors (e.g. V2 vasopressin receptors), which recycle slowly, beta-arrestin internalizes with the receptor into endosomes. In COS-7 and human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells, stimulation of the beta(2)AR or V2 vasopressin receptor leads, respectively, to transient or stable beta-arrestin ubiquitination. The time course of ubiquitination and deubiquitination of beta-arrestin correlates with its association with and dissociation from each type of receptor. Chimeric receptors, constructed by switching the cytoplasmic tails of the two classes of receptors (beta(2)AR and V2 vasopressin receptors), demonstrate reversal of the patterns of both beta-arrestin trafficking and beta-arrestin ubiquitination. To explore the functional consequences of beta-arrestin ubiquitination we constructed a yellow fluorescent protein-tagged beta-arrestin2-ubiquitin chimera that cannot be deubiquitinated by cellular deubiquitinases. This "permanently ubiquitinated" beta-arrestin did not dissociate from the beta(2)AR but rather internalized with it into endosomes, thus transforming this class A receptor into a class B receptor with respect to its trafficking pattern. Overexpression of this beta-arrestin ubiquitin chimera in HEK-293 cells also results in enhancement of beta(2)AR internalization and degradation. In the presence of N-ethylmaleimide (an inhibitor of deubiquitinating enzymes), coimmunoprecipitation of the receptor and beta-arrestin was increased dramatically, suggesting that deubiquitination of beta-arrestin triggers its dissociation from the receptor. Thus the ubiquitination status of beta-arrestin determines the stability of the receptor-beta-arrestin complex as well as the trafficking pattern of beta-arrestin.     

An activation switch in the rhodopsin family of G protein-coupled receptors: the thyrotropin receptor

We aimed at understanding molecular events involved in the activation of a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family, the thyrotropin receptor. We have focused on the transmembrane region and in particular on a network of polar interactions between highly conserved residues. Using molecular dynamics simulations and site-directed mutagenesis techniques we have identified residue Asn-7.49, of the NPxxY motif of TM 7, as a molecular switch in the mechanism of thyrotropin receptor (TSHr) activation. Asn-7.49 appears to adopt two different conformations in the inactive and active states. These two states are characterized by specific interactions between this Asn and polar residues in the transmembrane domain. The inactive gauche+ conformation is maintained by interactions with residues Thr-6.43 and Asp-6.44. Mutation of these residues into Ala increases the constitutive activity of the receptor by factors of approximately 14 and approximately 10 relative to wild type TSHr, respectively. Upon receptor activation Asn-7.49 adopts the trans conformation to interact with Asp-2.50 and a putatively charged residue that remains to be identified. In addition, the conserved Leu-2.46 of the (N/S)LxxxD motif also plays a significant role in restraining the receptor in the inactive state because the L2.46A mutation increases constitutive activity by a factor of approximately 13 relative to wild type TSHr. As residues Leu-2.46, Asp-2.50, and Asn-7.49 are strongly conserved, this molecular mechanism of TSHr activation can be extended to other members of the rhodopsin-like family of G protein-coupled receptors.     

Organization of the G protein-coupled receptors rhodopsin and opsin in native membranes

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which constitute the largest and structurally best conserved family of signaling molecules, are involved in virtually all physiological processes. Crystal structures are available only for the detergent-solubilized light receptor rhodopsin. In addition, this receptor is the only GPCR for which the presumed higher order oligomeric state in native membranes has been demonstrated (Fotiadis, D., Liang, Y., Filipek, S., Saperstein, D. A., Engel, A., and Palczewski, K. (2003) Nature 421, 127-128). Here, we have determined by atomic force microscopy the organization of rhodopsin in native membranes obtained from wild-type mouse photoreceptors and opsin isolated from photoreceptors of Rpe65-/- mutant mice, which do not produce the chromophore 11-cis-retinal. The higher order organization of rhodopsin was present irrespective of the support on which the membranes were adsorbed for imaging. Rhodopsin and opsin form structural dimers that are organized in paracrystalline arrays. The intradimeric contact is likely to involve helices IV and V, whereas contacts mainly between helices I and II and the cytoplasmic loop connecting helices V and VI facilitate the formation of rhodopsin dimer rows. Contacts between rows are on the extracellular side and involve helix I. This is the first semi-empirical model of a higher order structure of a GPCR in native membranes, and it has profound implications for the understanding of how this receptor interacts with partner proteins.     

Seven evolutionarily conserved human rhodopsin G protein-coupled receptors lacking close relatives

We report seven new members of the superfamily of human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) found by searches in the human genome databases, termed GPR100, GPR119, GPR120, GPR135, GPR136, GPR141, and GPR142. We also report 16 orthologues of these receptors in mouse, rat, fugu (pufferfish) and zebrafish. Phylogenetic analysis shows that these are additional members of the family of rhodopsin-type GPCRs. GPR100 shows similarity with the orphan receptor SALPR. Remarkably, the other receptors do not have any close relative among other known human rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Most of these orphan receptors are highly conserved through several vertebrate species and are present in single copies. Analysis of expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences indicated individual expression patterns, such as for GPR135, which was found in a wide variety of tissues including eye, brain, cervix, stomach and testis. Several ESTs for GPR141 were found in marrow and cancer cells, while the other receptors seem to have more restricted expression patterns.     

Signal transmission via G protein-coupled receptors in the light of rhodopsin structure determination

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transducing diverse external signals to cells via activation of heterotrimeric GTP-binding (G) proteins, estimated to mediate actions of 60% of drugs, had been resistant to structure determination until summer 2000. The first atomic-resolution experimental structure of a GPCR, that of dark (inactive) rhodopsin, thus provides a trustworthy 3D prototype for antagonist-bound forms of this huge family of proteins. In this work, our former theoretical GPCR models are evaluated against the new experimental template. Subsequently, a working hypothesis regarding the signal transduction mechanism by GPCRs is presented.     

Association of beta-arrestin with G protein-coupled receptors during clathrin-mediated endocytosis dictates the profile of receptor resensitization.

Resensitization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) following agonist-mediated desensitization is a necessary step for maintaining physiological responsiveness. However, the molecular mechanisms governing the nature of GPCR resensitization are poorly understood. Here, we examine the role of beta-arrestin in the resensitization of the beta(2) adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR), known to recycle and resensitize rapidly, and the vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R), known to recycle and resensitize slowly. Upon agonist activation, both receptors recruit beta-arrestin to the plasma membrane and internalize in a beta-arrestin- and clathrin-dependent manner. However, whereas beta-arrestin dissociates from the beta(2)AR at the plasma membrane, it internalizes with the V2R into endosomes. The differential trafficking of beta-arrestin and the ability of these two receptors to dephosphorylate, recycle, and resensitize is completely reversed when the carboxyl-terminal tails of these two receptors are switched. Moreover, the ability of beta-arrestin to remain associated with desensitized GPCRs during clathrin-mediated endocytosis is mediated by a specific cluster of phosphorylated serine residues in the receptor carboxyl-terminal tail. These results demonstrate that the interaction of beta-arrestin with a specific motif in the GPCR carboxyl-terminal tail dictates the rate of receptor dephosphorylation, recycling, and resensitization, and thus provide direct evidence for a novel mechanism by which beta-arrestins regulate the reestablishment of GPCR responsiveness.     

Cellular trafficking of G protein-coupled receptor/beta-arrestin endocytic complexes

beta-Arrestins are multifunctional proteins identified on the basis of their ability to bind and uncouple G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) from heterotrimeric G proteins. In addition, beta-arrestins play a central role in mediating GPCR endocytosis, a key regulatory step in receptor resensitization. In this study, we visualize the intracellular trafficking of beta-arrestin2 in response to activation of several distinct GPCRs including the beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR), angiotensin II type 1A receptor (AT1AR), dopamine D1A receptor (D1AR), endothelin type A receptor (ETAR), and neurotensin receptor (NTR). Our results reveal that in response to beta2AR activation, beta-arrestin2 translocation to the plasma membrane shares the same pharmacological profile as described for receptor activation and sequestration, consistent with a role for beta-arrestin as the agonist-driven switch initiating receptor endocytosis. Whereas redistributed beta-arrestins are confined to the periphery of cells and do not traffic along with activated beta2AR, D1AR, and ETAR in endocytic vesicles, activation of AT1AR and NTR triggers a clear time-dependent redistribution of beta-arrestins to intracellular vesicular compartments where they colocalize with internalized receptors. Activation of a chimeric AT1AR with the beta2AR carboxyl-terminal tail results in a beta-arrestin membrane localization pattern similar to that observed in response to beta2AR activation. In contrast, the corresponding chimeric beta2AR with the AT1AR carboxyl-terminal tail gains the ability to translocate beta-arrestin to intracellular vesicles. These results demonstrate that the cellular trafficking of beta-arrestin proteins is differentially regulated by the activation of distinct GPCRs. Furthermore, they suggest that the carboxyl-tail of the receptors might be involved in determining the stability of receptor/betaarrestin complexes and cellular distribution of beta-arrestins.     

Distinct roles of the second and third cytoplasmic loops of bovine rhodopsin in G protein activation

In contrast to the extensive studies of light-induced conformational changes in rhodopsin, the cytoplasmic architecture of rhodopsin related to the G protein activation and the selective recognition of G protein subtype is still unclear. Here, we prepared a set of bovine rhodopsin mutants whose cytoplasmic loops were replaced by those of other ligand-binding receptors, and we compared their ability for G protein activation in order to obtain a clue to the roles of the second and third cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin. The mutants bearing the third loop of four other G(o)-coupled receptors belonging to the rhodopsin superfamily showed significant G(o) activation, indicating that the third loop of rhodopsin possibly has a putative site(s) related to the interaction of G protein and that it is simply exchangeable with those of other G(o)-coupled receptors. The mutants bearing the second loop of other receptors, however, had little ability for G protein activation, suggesting that the second loop of rhodopsin contains a specific region essential for rhodopsin to be a G protein-activating form. Systematic chimeric and point mutational studies indicate that three amino acids (Glu(134), Val(138), and Cys(140)) in the N-terminal region of the second loop of rhodopsin are crucial for efficient G protein activation. These results suggest that the second and third cytoplasmic loops of bovine rhodopsin have distinct roles in G protein activation and subtype specificity.     

The G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin in the native membrane

The higher-order structure of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in membranes may involve dimerization and formation of even larger oligomeric complexes. Here, we have investigated the organization of the prototypical GPCR rhodopsin in its native membrane by electron and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Disc membranes from mice were isolated and observed by AFM at room temperature. In all experimental conditions, rhodopsin forms structural dimers organized in paracrystalline arrays. A semi-empirical molecular model for the rhodopsin paracrystal is presented validating our previously reported results. Finally, we compare our model with other currently available models describing the supramolecular structure of GPCRs in the membrane.     

Use of fluorescence polarization detection for the measurement of fluopeptidetm binding to G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the single largest molecular target of therapeutic drugs currently on the market, and are also the most common target in high throughput screening assays designed to identify potential new drug candidates. A large percentage of these assays are now formatted as radioligand binding assays. Fluorescence polarization ligand binding assays can offer a non-rad alternative to radioligand binding assays. In addition, fluorescence polarization assays are a homogenous format that is easy to automate for high throughput screening. We have developed a series of peptide ligands labeled with the fluorescent dye BODIPY TMR whose binding to GPCRs can be detected using fluorescence polarization methodology. BODIPY TMR has advantages over the more commonly used fluorescein dye in high throughput screening (HTS) assays due to the fact that its excitation and emission spectra are red-shifted approximately 50 nm relative to fluorescein. Assays based on BODIPY TMR ligands are therefore less susceptible to interference from tissue auto-fluorescence in the assay matrix, or the effects of colored or fluorescent compounds in the screening libraries. A series of BODIPY TMR labeled peptides have been prepared that bind to a range of GPCRs including melanin concentrating hormone, bradykinin, and melanocortin receptors. Conditions have been optimized in order to utilize a comparable amount of receptor membrane preparation as is used in a radioligand binding assay. The assays are formatted in 384-well microplates with a standard volume of 40 microL. We have compared the assays across the different fluorescence polarization (FP) readers available to determine the parameters for each instrument necessary to achieve the required precision.     

Identification of ciliary localization sequences within the third intracellular loop of G protein-coupled receptors

Primary cilia are sensory organelles present on most mammalian cells. The functions of cilia are defined by the signaling proteins localized to the ciliary membrane. Certain G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including somatostatin receptor 3 (Sstr3) and serotonin receptor 6 (Htr6), localize to cilia. As Sstr3 and Htr6 are the only somatostatin and serotonin receptor subtypes that localize to cilia, we hypothesized they contain ciliary localization sequences. To test this hypothesis we expressed chimeric receptors containing fragments of Sstr3 and Htr6 in the nonciliary receptors Sstr5 and Htr7, respectively, in ciliated cells. We found the third intracellular loop of Sstr3 or Htr6 is sufficient for ciliary localization. Comparison of these loops revealed a loose consensus sequence. To determine whether this consensus sequence predicts ciliary localization of other GPCRs, we compared it with the third intracellular loop of all human GPCRs. We identified the consensus sequence in melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 (Mchr1) and confirmed Mchr1 localizes to primary cilia in vitro and in vivo. Thus, we have identified a putative GPCR ciliary localization sequence and used this sequence to identify a novel ciliary GPCR. As Mchr1 mediates feeding behavior and metabolism, our results implicate ciliary signaling in the regulation of body weight.     

Mapping the binding sites of peptide and non-peptide molecules to G protein-coupled receptors by fluorescence

Summary Novel fluorescence approaches to investigate ligand recognition and structure of G protein-coupled receptors in native membranes have been developed. These methods combine the biosynthetic incorporation of unnatural fluorescent amino acids at known sites in receptors with the technique of fluorescence energy transfer for distance measurement. This permits one to fix the ligand in space and to define the structure of the receptor in a model of ligand-receptor interactions. Subdomains of ligand binding sites on NK1 and NK2 receptors were also characterized using environment-sensitive fluorophores and the techniques of collisional quenching and anisotropy. Antagonists and agonists have different binding sites on NK1 and NK2.     

Mapping the binding sites of peptide and non-peptide molecules to G protein-coupled receptors by fluorescence

Novel fluorescence approaches to investigate ligand recognition and structure of G protein-coupled receptors in native membranes have been developed. These methods combine the biosynthetic incorporation of unnatural fluorescent amino acids at known sites in receptors with the technique of fluorescence energy transfer for distance measurement. This permits one to fix the ligand in space and to define the structure of the receptor in a model of ligand–receptor interactions. Subdomains of ligand binding sites on NK1 and NK2 receptors were also characterized using environment-sensitive fluorophores and the techniques of collisional quenching and anisotropy. Antagonists and agonists have different binding sites on NK1 and NK2.     

Downregulation of G protein-coupled receptors

Major advances have been made in understanding mechanisms mediating downregulation of G protein-coupled receptors. Recent studies emphasize the role of multiple proteolytic mechanisms in downregulation. A specific mechanism of downregulation, mediated by endocytosis of receptors via clathrin-coated pits followed by sorting to lysosomes, has been examined in detail. Specific protein interactions that control the specificity of G-protein-coupled receptor trafficking in this pathway are beginning to be elucidated.     

Interaction of class A G protein-coupled receptors with G proteins

A model for interaction of classA G protein-coupled receptor with the G protein G(alpha) subunit is proposed using the rhodopsin-transducin (RD/Gt) prototype. The model combines the resolved interactions/distances, essential in the active RD*/Gt system, with the structure of Gt(alpha) C-terminal peptide bound to RD* while stabilizing it. Assuming the interactions involve conserved parts of the partners, the model specifies the conserved Helix 2 non-polar X- - -X, Helix 3 DRY and Helix 7/8 NP- -Y- - F RD* motifs interacting with the Gt(alpha) C-terminal peptide, in compliance with the structure of the latter. A concomitant role of Gt(alpha) and Gt(gamma) C-termini in stabilizing RD* could possibly be resolved assuming a receptor dimer as requisite for G protein activation.     

Ubiquitination-independent trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors to lysosomes

Ubiquitination of cytoplasmic lysine residues can target G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to proteasomes and has recently been shown to also be required for sorting of certain GPCRs to lysosomes following ligand-induced endocytosis. We addressed the generality of this mechanism by examining regulated proteolysis of the murine delta opioid receptor (DOR) expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, a well characterized model system in which receptors are sorted to lysosomes. Incubation of cells in the presence of the highly specific proteasome inhibitor lactacystin did not detectably affect ligand-induced proteolysis of DOR but significantly delayed ligand-induced proteolysis of epidermal growth factor receptors. Mutation of all cytoplasmic lysine residues in DOR, creating a mutant opioid receptor that is unable to be ubiquitinated, did not detectably inhibit either ligand-induced endocytosis or proteolytic degradation of endocytosed receptors. Furthermore, the lysine-mutated DOR, like its wild type counterpart, colocalized extensively with lysosomes after ligand-induced endocytosis. These results demonstrate that ubiquitination of DOR is not required either for its ligand-induced endocytosis or for postendocytic trafficking to lysosomes.     

Nrg-1 belongs to the endothelial differentiation gene family of G protein-coupled sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors

The previously cloned rat nerve growth factor-regulated G protein-coupled receptor NRG-1 (Glickman, M., Malek, R. L., Kwitek-Black, A. E., Jacob, H. J., and Lee N. H. (1999) Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 14, 141-52), also known as EDG-8, binds sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) with high affinity and specificity. In this paper we examined the signal transduction pathways regulated by the binding of S1P to EDG-8. In Chinese hamster ovary cells heterologously expressing EDG-8, S1P inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation and activated c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase. Surprisingly, S1P inhibited serum-induced activation of extracellular regulated protein kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2). Treatment with pertussis toxin, which ADP-ribosylates and inactivates G(i), blocked S1P-mediated inhibition of cAMP accumulation, but had no effect on c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activation or inhibition of ERK1/2. The inhibitory effect of S1P on ERK1/2 activity was abolished by treatment with orthovanadate, suggesting the involvement of a tyrosine phosphatase. A subunit selective [35S] guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding assay demonstrates that EDG-8 activated G(i/o) and G12 but not Gs and G(q/11) in response to S1P. In agreement, EDG-8 did not stimulate phosphoinositide turnover or cAMP accumulation. The ability of S1P to induce mitogenesis in cells expressing the EDG-1 subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors is well characterized. In contrast, S1P inhibited proliferation in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing EDG-8 but not empty vector. The antiproliferative effect, like S1P-mediated ERK1/2 inhibition, was orthovanadate-sensitive and pertussis toxin-insensitive. Our results indicate that EDG-8, a member of the EDG-1 subfamily, couples to unique signaling pathways.     

Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a template for cone visual pigments and other G protein-coupled receptors

The crystal structure of rhodopsin has provided the first three-dimensional molecular model for a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). Alignment of the molecular model from the crystallographic structure with the helical axes seen in cryo-electron microscopic (cryo-EM) studies provides an opportunity to investigate the properties of the molecule as a function of orientation and location within the membrane. In addition, the structure provides a starting point for modeling and rational experimental approaches of the cone pigments, the GPCRs in cone cells responsible for color vision. Homology models of the cone pigments provide a means of understanding the roles of amino acid sequence differences that shift the absorption maximum of the retinal chromophore in the environments of different opsins.