Phylogenetic analysis of polymorphic DNA sequences at the Adh locus inDrosophila melanogaster and its sibling species

Summary Recent sequencing of over 2300 nucleotides containing the alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) locus in each of 11Drosophila melanogaster lines makes it possible to estimate the approximate age of the electrophoretic fast-slow polymorphism. Our estimates, based on various possible patterns of evolution, range from 610,000 to 3,500,000 years, with 1,000,000 years as a reasonable point estimate. Furthermore, comparison of these sequences with those of the homologous region ofD. simulans andD. mauritiana allows us to infer the pattern of evolutionary change of theD. melanogaster sequences. The integrity of the Adh-f electrophoretic alleles as a single lineage is supported by both unweighted pair-group method (UPGMA) and parsimony analyeses. However, considerable divergence among the Adh-s lines seems to have preceded the origin of the Adh-f allele. Comparisons of the sequences ofD. melanogaster genes with those ofD. simulans andD. mauritiana genes suggest that the split between the latter two species occurred more recently than the divergence of some of the present-day Adh-s genes inD. melanogaster. The phylogenetic analyses of theD. melanogaster sequences show that the fastslow distinction is not perfect, and suggest that intragenic recombination or gene conversion occurred in the evolution of this locus. We extended conventional phylogenetic analyses by using a statistical technique for detecting and characterizing recombination events. We show that the pattern of differentiation of DNA sequences inD. melanogaster is roughly compatible with the neutral theory of molecular evolution.     

Patterns of puffing activity in the salivary gland chromosomes of Drosophila

Salivary gland X chromosome puffing patterns are described for the Oregon stock of Drosophila melanogaster and for the Berkeley stock of D. simulans. In D. melanogaster regular phase specific puffing was recorded at 21 loci in the third larval instar and subsequent prepupal stage. A comparison of the X chromosome puffing patterns of male and female larvae failed to show any qualitative differences although in the males a group of puffs were active for a longer time during development than in females. The X chromosome puffing patterns of D. simulans are similar to those described for D. melanogaster although two puffs (4F 1–4 and 7B 1–3) were active in D. simulans but not in D. melanogaster. The sex differences in puffing observed in D. melanogaster were also observed in D. simulans.     

Insertion sites of the transposable elementmariner are fixed in the genome ofDrosophila sechellia

Summary The abundance of the transposable elementmariner differs dramatically in the genomes of the closely related speciesDrosophila simulans, D. mauritiana, D. sechellia, andD. melanogaster. Natural populations ofD. simulans andD. mauritiana have 1–10 and 20–30 copies per diploid genome, respectively, and the insertion sites are polymorphic. The element has not been found inD. melanogaster. In this paper we show thatD. sechellia, a species endemic to the Seychelles Islands, contains only twomariner elements that are at fixed sites in the genome. One element, inserted in chromosome 2R at 51A1–2, contains three deletions and is missing much of the 3 end. The other element, inserted in chromosome 3L at 64A10–11, is the full length of 1286 bp. Although the sequence of the full-length element is polymorphic in populations ofD. sechellia, at least some of the sequences are closely related to elements fromD. simulans andD. mauritiana that are known to be active. However, judging from the progeny of crosses betweenD. sechellia andD. simulans, the biological activity of the full-lengthD. sechellia element appears to be low, either because of the nucleotide sequence of the element or because of its position in the genome, or both.     

Nucleotide sequence comparison of the Adh gene in three drosophilids

Summary The alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) gene has been isolated fromDrosophila simulans andD. mauritiana by screening clone libraries of each with a previously cloned Adh gene fromD. melanogaster. The isolated clones were subcloned and partially sequenced to determine the relatedness of these species and to examine details of evolutionary change in the structure of the Adh gene. We report the sequence of the first 704 nucleotides of each gene as well as 127 bases in the 5 untranslated region. When these sequences are compared,D. melanogaster differs fromD. simulans andD. mauritiana by 2.8% and 3.1%, respectively.D. simulans andD. mauritiana differ by only 1.8%, implying that they are more closely related to each other than either is toD. melanogaster. This is consistent with phylogenetic relationships established by a variety of genetic, biochemical, and morphological means and illustrates that DNA sequencing of a single gene may be used to assess the evolutionary relationships of species.     

Comparison of lethal mutations of Drosophila melanogaster with D. simulans when detected by the attached-X method

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the attached-X method compared with the standard Basc method, and, using this method, to find out whether the observed differences in genetic polymorphisms are related to differences in lethal mutation rates in D. melanogaster and D. simulans. When EMS-treated Drosophila melanogaster males are mated to untreated attached-X females, a decrease in the progeny sex ratio (/+) is observed due to the induced lethal mutations on the X chromosome. The decrease in the frequency of male progeny were shown as the attached-X index. The expected male number is calculated from the control sex ratio. The difference between the expected and the observed male numbers, expressed as the ratio to the expected male number, defines the attached-X index. The index values for various EMS concentrations were compared to the lethal frequencies obtained by the standard Basc method for the same EMS treatments, and gave a highly positive correlation (=0.993, p<0.01, d.f.=2), thus providing an alternative method for evaluation of possible mutagens. The attached-X method was applied to D. simulans, of which natural populations are known to have relatively low genetic variation, and frequencies of the EMS-induced X chromosome lethal mutations were estimated and compared with those in D. melanogaster. The results indicate that D. melanogaster is slightly more sensitive in the sperm and spermatogonial stages, but less susceptible in the spermatid stage when compared with D. simulans. Since the spermatid stage occupies a relatively short period in spermatogenesis, a higher mutability of D. simulans during this stage probably does not make a significant contribution to the genetic variability of this species.     

A Comprehensive Study of Genic Variation in Natural Populations of Drosophila melanogaster. III. Variations in Genetic Structure and Their Causes between Drosophila melanogaster and Its Sibling Species Drosophila simulans

The natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans were compared for their genetic structure. A total of 114 gene-protein loci were studied in four mainland (from Europe and Africa) and an island (Seychelle) populations of D. simulans and the results were compared with those obtained on the same set of homologous loci in fifteen worldwide populations of D. melanogaster. The main results are as follows: (1) D. melanogaster shows a significantly higher proportion of loci polymorphic than D. simulans (52% vs. 39%, P<0.05), (2) both species have similar mean heterozygosity and mean number of alleles per locus, (3) the two species share some highly polymorphic loci but they do not share loci that show high geographic differentiation, and (4) D. simulans shows significantly less geographic differentiation than D. melanogaster. The differences in genetic differentiation between the two species are limited to loci located on the X and second chromosomes only; loci on the third chromosome show similar level of geographic differentiation in both species. These two species have previously been shown to differ in their pattern of variation for chromosomal polymorphisms, quantitative and physiological characters, two-dimensional electrophoretic (2DE) proteins, middle repetitive DNA and mitochondrial DNA. Variation in niche-widths and/or genetic "strategies" of adaptation appear to be the main causes of differences in the genetic structure of these two species.     

Evolution of thedec-1 eggshell locus inDrosophila. I. Restriction site mapping and limited sequence comparison in themelanogaster species subgroup

Summary We have analyzed 18 kb of DNA in and upstream of thedefective chorion-1 (dec-1) locus of the eight known species of themelanogaster species subgroup ofDrosophila. The restriction maps ofD. simulans, D. mauritiana, D. sechellia, D. erecta, andD. orena are shown to have basically the restriction map ofD. melanogaster, whereas the maps ofD. teissieri andD. yakuba were more difficult to align. However, the basic amount of DNA and sequence arrangement appear to have been conserved in these species. A small deletion of varying length (65–200 bp) is found in a repeated sequence of the central transcribed region ofD. melanogaster, D. simulans, andD. erecta. Restriction site mapping indicated that thedec-1 gene is highly conserved in themelanogaster species subgroup. However, sequence comparison revealed that the amount of nucleotide and amino acid substitution in the repeated region is much larger than in the 5 translated region. The 5 flanking region showed noticeable restriction site polymorphisms between species. Based on calculations from the restriction maps a dendrogram was derived that supports earlier published phylogenetic relationships within themelanogaster species subgroup except that theerecta-orena pair is placed closer to themelanogaster complex than toD. teissieri andD. yakuba.     

Contrasting patterns of genetic structure and evolutionary history as revealed by rnitochondrial DNA and nuclear gene-enzyme variation betweenDrosophila melanogaster andDrosophila simulans

Drosophila melanogaster and its sibling speciesD. simulans have a cosmopolitan distribution. Studies on nuclear gene-enzyme variation from natural populations of these species reveal that the two have almost equal overall heterozygosity, yetD. simulans populations are significantly less differentiated. However, it is not clear whether this difference in population structure represents a difference in the genetic strategy with which they respond to the same adaptive challenges, or is the result of difference in species history. To help answer this question, we have undertaken an intensive survey of restriction fragment length polymorphisms of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) fromD. simulans; the results are compared with those fromD. melanogaster. We surveyed 69 isofemale lines ofD. simulans from four continents and seven lines from the Seychelles Islands. Ten restriction enzymes detected 104 restriction sites in the continental mtDNAs, of which only threeHinf1 sites were variable and account for fourHlnf1 (restriction variants) haplotypes. These four variants were all found in geographically distant locations. By contrast, twenty-three haplotypes were observed inD. melanogaster, many of which were observed in only one population. It would seem, therefore, that these two species have had different histories. Specifically, cosmopolitan populations ofD: simulans are probably products of a comparatively recent expansion from a source population in Africa. These results do not negate differences in their genetic strategy of adaptation, but they do show the importance of historical contingency in the present-day pattern of geographic variation.     

Chromosome Localization of the λ20p1.4 clone of the Drosophila melanogaster Nuclear Lamina DNA in the melanogaster Species Subgroup of the Genus Drosophila (Sophophora)

Chromosome localization of sequences homologous to 20p1.4 of the Drosophila melanogaster nuclear lamina DNA (nlDNA) was established by in situ hybridization in species of the melanogastersubgroup. DNA of the 20p1.4 clone was shown to be located in the chromocenter in all the species examined. Laboratory strains of D. simulans, D. mauritiana, andD. sechellia exhibited interspecific differences in localization of 20p1.4 nlDNA on chromosome arms. In eight natural populations, intraspecific polymorphism of 20p1.4 nlDNA chromosome localization was shown to be present in D. simulans but absent in D. melanogaster. The possible participation of transposable elements in 20p1.4 nlDNA relocation is discussed.     

Contrasting patterns of geographic variation in the cosmopolitan sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans

An electrophoretic study was carried out to compare the geographic pattern of genetic variation in Drosophila simulans with that of its sibling species, Drosophila melanogaster. An identical set of 32 gene-protein loci was studied in four geographically distant populations of D. simulans and two populations of D. melanogaster, all originating from Europe and Africa. The comparison yielded the following results: (1) tropical populations of D. simulans were, in terms of the number of unique alleles, average heterozygosity per locus, and percentage of loci polymorphic, more variable than conspecific-temperate populations; (2) some loci in both species showed interpopulation differences in allele frequencies that suggest latitudinal clines; and (3) temperate-tropical genetic differentiation between populations was much less in D. simulans than in D. melanogaster. Similar differences between these two species have previously been shown for chromosomal, quantitative, physiological, and middle-repetitive DNA variation. Estimates of N _m (number of migrants per generation) from the spatial distribution of rare alleles suggest that both species have similar levels of interpopulation gene flow. These observations lead us to propose two competing hypotheses: the low level of geographic differentiation in D. simulans is due to its evolutionarily recent worldwide colonization and, alternatively, D. simulans has a narrower niche than D. melanogaster. Geographic variation data on different genetic elements (e.g., mitochondrial DNA, two-dimensional proteins, etc.) are required before these hypotheses can be adequately tested.We thank the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada for financial support (Grant A0235 to R.S.S.).     

Molecular and cytogenic analysis of pericentromeric heterochromatin in ovarian nurse cells of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis> subgroup species

Evolutionary rearrangements of pericentromeric heterochromatin among Drosophila melanogaster subgroup species have been investigated. A region-specific DNA library from Drosophila orena ovarian nurse cell chromocenter was obtained by the microdissection of polythene chromosomes. The probe has been localized on chromosomes of ovarian nurse cells of Drosophila melanogaster subgroup species using fluorescent hybridization in situ. Sequences homologous to the sequences of the DNA probe were detected in the chromocenter and pericentromeric regions of D. orena polythene chromosomes, in all pericentromeric regions of other species with several exceptions. There was no labeling on one of the arms of the D. simulans chromosome 2; however, these sequences were present on the telomere of D. erecta chromosome 3 and in regions adjacent to the brightly DAPI-stained heterochromatin blocks of D. yakuba, D. santomea and D. teissieri chromosomes 2 and 3. At the S₆ stage (secondary reticulate nucleus), labeled chromatin can be found mostly within a restricted territory in D. orena nucleus; no such chromatin can be detected throughout the rest of the nucleus. On the contrary, at this stage, in nuclei of other species, labeled DNA is spread diffusely.     

Alcohol dehydrogenase polymorphism inDrosophila: Enzyme kinetics of product inhibition

Summary Because natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster are polymorphic for different allozymes of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and becauseD. melanogaster is more tolerant to the toxic effects of ethanol than its sibling speciesD. simulans, information regarding the sensitivities of the different forms of ADH to the products of ethanol degradation are of ecological importance. ADH-F, ADH-S, ADH-71k ofD. melanogaster and the ADH ofD. simulans were inhibited by NADH, but the inhibition was relieved by NAD⁺. The order of sensitivity of NADH was ADH-F<ADH-71k, ADH-S<ADH-simulans with ADH-F being about four times less sensitive than theD. melanogaster enzymes and 12 times less sensitive than theD. simulans enzyme. Acetaldehyde inhibited the ethanolto-acetaldehyde activity of the ADHs, but at low acetaldehyde concentrations ethanol and NAD⁺ reduced the inhibition. ADH-71k and ADH-F were more subject to the inhibitory action of acetaldehyde than ADH-S and ADH-simulans, with ADH-71k being seven times more sensitive than ADH-S. The pattern of product inhibition of ADH-71k suggests a rapid equilibrium random mechanism for ethanol oxidation. Thus, although the ADH variants only differ by a few amino acids, these differences exert a far larger impact on their intrinsic properties than previously thought. How differences in product inhibition may be of significance in the evolution of the ADHs is discussed.     

Drosophila virilis histone gene clusters lacking H1 coding segments

Summary Approximately 30–40% ofDrosophila virilis DNA complementary to clonedDrosophila histone genes is reduced to 3.4-kilobase-pair (kbp) segments by Bgl I or Bgl II digestion. The core histone genes of a 3.4-kbp Bgl II segment cloned in the plasmid pDv3/3.4 have the same order as theD. melanogaster core histone genes in the plasmid cDm500: . Nonetheless, pDv3/3.4 and cDm500 have different histone gene configurations: In pDv3/3.4, the region between the H2B and H3 genes contains 0.35 kbp and cannot encode histone H1; in cDm500, the region contains 2.0 kbp and encodes histone H1. The lack of an H1 gene between the H2B and H3 genes in 30–40% ofD. virilis histone gene clusters suggests that changes in histone gene arrays have occurred during the evolution ofDrosophila. The ancestors of modernDrosophila may have possessed multiple varieties of histone gene clusters, which were subsequently lost differentially in thevirilis andmelanogaster lineages. Alternatively, they may have possessed a single variety, which was rearranged during evolution. The H1 genes ofD. virilis andD. melanogaster did not cross-hybridize in vitro under conditions that maintain stable duplexes between DNAs that are 75% homologous. Consequently,D. virilis H1 genes could not be visualized by hybridization to an H1-specific probe and thus remain unidentified. Our observations suggest that the coding segments in the H1 genes ofD. virilis andD. melanogaster are >25% divergent. Our estimate of sequence divergence in the H1 genes ofD. virilis andD. melanogaster seems high until one considers that the coding sequences of cloned H1 genes from the closely related speciesD. melanogaster andD. simulans are 5% divergent.     

Identification of One Intron Loss and Phylogenetic Evolution of Dfak Gene in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group

Intron loss and its evolutionary significance have been noted in Drosophila. The current study provides another example of intron loss within a single-copy Dfak gene in Drosophila. By using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we amplified about 1.3 kb fragment spanning intron 5–10, located in the position of Tyr kinase (TyK) domain of Dfak gene from Drosophila melanogaster species group, and observed size difference among the amplified DNA fragments from different species. Further sequencing analysis revealed that D. melanogaster and D. simulans deleted an about 60 bp of DNA fragment relative to other 7 Drosophila species, such as D. elegans, D. ficusphila, D. biarmipes, D. takahashii, D. jambulina, D. prostipennis and D. pseudoobscura, and the deleted fragment located precisely in the position of one intron. The data suggested that intron loss might have occurred in the Dfak gene evolutionary process of D. melanogaster and D. simulans of Drosophila melanogaster species group. In addition, the constructed phylogenetic tree based on the Dfak TyK domains clearly revealed the evolutionary relationships between subgroups of Drosophila melanogaster species group, and the intron loss identified from D. melanogaster and D. simulans provides a unique diagnostic tool for taxonomic classification of the melanogaster subgroup from other group of genus Drosophila.     

Isolation of Protease-Free Alcohol Dehydrogenase (ADH) from Drosophila simulans and Several Homozygous and Heterozygous Drosophila melanogaster Variants

The enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) fromseveral naturally occurring ADH variants ofDrosophila melanogaster and Drosophilasimulans was isolated. Affinity chromatography withthe ligand Cibacron Blue and elution with NAD⁺ showed similarbehavior for D. melanogaster ADH-FF, ADH-71k,and D. simulans ADH. Introduction of a secondCibacron Blue affinity chromatography step, withgradient elution with NAD⁺, resulted in pure and stable enzymes. D.melanogaster ADH-SS cannot be eluted from theaffinity chromatography column at a high concentrationof NAD⁺ and required a pH gradient for itspurification, preceded by a wash step with a high concentration ofNAD⁺. Hybrid Drosophila melanogasteralcohol dehydrogenase FS has been isolated fromheterozygous flies, using affinity chromatography withfirst elution at a high concentration NAD⁺, directlyfollowed by affinity chromatography elution with a pHgradient. Incubation of equal amounts of pure homodimersof Drosophila melanogaster ADH-FF and ADH-SS,in the presence of 3 M urea at pH 8.6, for 30 min at roomtemperature, followed by reassociation yielded activeDrosophila melanogaster ADH-FS heterodimers. Noproteolytic degradation was found after incubation ofpurified enzyme preparations in the absence or presenceof SDS, except for some degradation of ADH-SS after verylong incubation times. The thermostabilities of D.melanogaster ADH-71k and ADH-SS were almostidentical and were higher than those of D.melanogaster ADH-FF and D. simulans ADH. Thethermostability of D. melanogaster ADH-FS waslower than those of D. melanogaster ADH-FF andADH-SS. D. melanogaster ADH-FF and ADH-71k have identical inhibition constantswith the ligand Cibacron Blue at pH 8.6, which are twotimes higher at pH 9.5. The K_i values forD. simulans ADH are three times lower at bothpH values. D. melanogaster ADH-SS and ADH-FS havesimilar K_i values, which are lower than thosefor D. melanogaster ADH-FF at pH 8.6. But at pH9.5 the K_i value for ADH-FS is the same as atpH 8.6, while that of ADH-SS is seven times higher. Kinetic parameters ofDrosophila melanogaster ADH-FF, ADH-SS, andADH-71k and Drosophila simulans ADH, at pH 8.6and 9.5, showed little or no variation inK_m ^eth values. TheK_m ^NAD values measured at pH 9.5for Drosophila alcohol dehydrogenases are alllower than those measured at pH 8.6. The rate constants(k_cat) determined for all fourDrosophila alcohol dehydrogenases are higher at pH 9.5 than at pH 8.6. D.melanogaster ADH-FS showed nonlinear kinetics.     

Chromosomal homologies betweenDrosophila lebanonensis andD. melanogaster determined by in situ hybridization

Twelve biotin-labelled recombinant DNA probes were hybridized to polytene chromosomes ofDrosophila melanogaster andD. lebanonesis. Probes were chosen in order to cover the whole chromosomal complement. Six probes correspond to known genes fromD. melanogaster (RpII215, H3–H4, MHC, hsp28/23, hsp83, hsp70), four probes are clones isolated from aD. subobscura library (Xdh, DsubS3, DsubG3, DsubG4) and the remaining two probes correspond to the Adh gene ofD. lebanonensis and to one sequence (262), not yet characterized, from the same species. The chromosomal homologies obtained from the in situ hybridization results allow us to determine that Muller's C and D chromosomal elements are fused in the karyotype ofD. lebanonensis and constitute the large metacentric chromosome. Single pericentric inversions in theE andB elements have generated the medium and small metacentric chromosomes, respectively. No great changes are detected in Muller'sA element, which remains acrocentric. The changes detected in the karyotypic evolution ofD. lebanonensis are frequently observed inDrosophila evolution, as deduced from chromosomal homologies of severalDrosophila species. The results are also consistent with Muller's proposal that chromosomal elements have been conserved during the evolution ofDrosophila.     

Evolution of the LINE-like I element in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup

LINE-like retrotransposons, the so-called I elements, control the system of I-R (inducer-reactive) hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. I elements are present in many Drosophila species. It has been suggested that active, complete I elements, located at different sites on the chromosomes, invaded natural populations of D. melanogaster recently (1920–1970). But old strains lacking active I elements have only defective I elements located in the chromocenter. We have cloned I elements from D. melanogaster and the melanogaster subgroup. In D. melanogaster, the nucleotide sequences of chromocentral I elements differed from those on chromosome arms by as much as 7%. All the I elements of D. mauritiana and D. sechellia are more closely related to the chromosomal I elements of D. melanogaster than to the chromocentral I elements in any species. No sequence difference was observed in the surveyed region between two chromosomal I elements isolated from D. melanogaster and one from D. simulans. These findings strongly support the idea that the defective chromocentral I elements of D. melanogaster originated before the species diverged and the chromosomal I elements were eliminated. The chromosomal I elements reinvaded natural populations of D. melanogaster recently, and were possibly introduced from D. simulans by horizontal transmission.     

Hybrid lethal systems in theDrosophila melanogaster species complex

Lethal phases of the hybrids betweenDrosophila melanogaster and its sibling species,D. simulans are classified into three types: (1) embryonic lethality in hybrids carryingD. simulans cytoplasm andD. melanogaster X chromosome, (2) larval lethality in hybrids not carryingD. simulans X, and (3) temperature-sensitive pupal lethality in hybrids carryingD. simulans X. The same lethal phases are also observed when either of the two other sibling species,D. mauritiana orD. sechellia, is employed for hybridization withD. melanogaster. Here, we describe genetic analyses of each hybrid lethality, and demonstrate that these three types of lethality are independent phenomena. We then propose two models to interpret the mechanisms of each hybrid lethality. The first model is a modification of the conventional X/autosome imbalance hypothesis assuming a lethal gene and a suppressor gene are involved in the larval lethality, while the second model is for embryonic lethality assuming an interaction between a maternal-effect lethal gene and a suppressor gene.     

THE REPRODUCTIVE RELATIONSHIPS OF DROSOPHILA SECHELLIA WITH D. MAURITIANA,D. SIMULANS,AND D. MELANOGASTER FROM THE AFROTROPICAL REGION

Hybridization tests among the four sibling species of the Drosophila melanogaster complex were made to determine the reproductive status of the recently discovered D. sechellia (which is endemic to a few islands and islets of the Seychelles archipelago) with regard to its three close relatives, D. mauritiana (endemic to Mauritius) and Afrotropical strains of the two cosmopolitan species D. melanogaster and D. simulans. Interstrain variation in the ability to hybridize with other species was also analyzed for D. melanogaster and D. simulans. D. mauritiana and D. simulans appear to be more weakly isolated from each other than either species is from D. sechellia. A striking unilateral mating success is observed in the cross of D. sechellia with D. simulans. The most extreme isolation is between D. melanogaster and its three siblings. Variation in the ability of strains to hybridize is observed in heterospecific crosses between D. simulans and either D. melanogaster or D. mauritiana.     

Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans

The population genetic perspective is that the processes shaping genomic variation can be revealed only through simultaneous investigation of sequence polymorphism and divergence within and between closely related species. Here we present a population genetic analysis of Drosophila simulans based on whole-genome shotgun sequencing of multiple inbred lines and comparison of the resulting data to genome assemblies of the closely related species, D. melanogaster and D. yakuba. We discovered previously unknown, large-scale fluctuations of polymorphism and divergence along chromosome arms, and significantly less polymorphism and faster divergence on the X chromosome. We generated a comprehensive list of functional elements in the D. simulans genome influenced by adaptive evolution. Finally, we characterized genomic patterns of base composition for coding and noncoding sequence. These results suggest several new hypotheses regarding the genetic and biological mechanisms controlling polymorphism and divergence across the Drosophila genome, and provide a rich resource for the investigation of adaptive evolution and functional variation in D. simulans.