Structure and evolutionary conservation of the plant N‐end rule pathway

The N‐end rule relates the in vivo half‐life of a protein to the identity of its N‐terminal amino acid residue. While some N‐terminal residues result in metabolically stable proteins, other, so‐called destabilizing residues, lead to rapid protein turnover. The N‐end rule pathway, which mediates the recognition and degradation of proteins with N‐terminal destabilizing residues, is present in all organisms examined, including prokaryotes. This protein degradation pathway has a hierarchical organization in which some N‐terminal residues, called primary destabilizing residues, are directly recognized by specific ubiquitin ligases. Other destabilizing residues, termed secondary and tertiary destabilizing residues, require modifications before the corresponding proteins can be targeted for degradation by ubiquitin ligases. In eukaryotes, the N‐end rule pathway is a part of the ubiquitin/proteasome system and is known to play essential roles in a broad range of biological processes in fungi, animals and plants. While the structure of the N‐end rule pathway has been extensively studied in yeast and mammals, knowledge of its organization in plants is limited. Using both tobacco and Arabidopsis, we identified the complete sets destabilizing and stabilizing N‐terminal residues. We also characterized the hierarchical organization of the plant N‐end rule by identifying and determining the specificity of two distinct N‐terminal amidohydrolases (Nt‐amidases) of Arabidopsis that are essential for the destabilizing activity of the tertiary destabilizing residues Asn and Gln. Our results indicate that both the N‐end rule itself and mechanistic aspects of the N‐end rule pathway in angiosperms are very similar to those of mammals.     

The N-end rule pathway and regulation by proteolysis

The N‐end rule relates the regulation of the in vivo half‐life of a protein to the identity of its N‐terminal residue. Degradation signals (degrons) that are targeted by the N‐end rule pathway include a set called N‐degrons. The main determinant of an N‐degron is a destabilizing N‐terminal residue of a protein. In eukaryotes, the N‐end rule pathway is a part of the ubiquitin system and consists of two branches, the Ac/N‐end rule and the Arg/N‐end rule pathways. The Ac/N‐end rule pathway targets proteins containing N^α‐terminally acetylated (Nt‐acetylated) residues. The Arg/N‐end rule pathway recognizes unacetylated N‐terminal residues and involves N‐terminal arginylation. Together, these branches target for degradation a majority of cellular proteins. For example, more than 80% of human proteins are cotranslationally Nt‐acetylated. Thus, most proteins harbor a specific degradation signal, termed ^AcN‐degron, from the moment of their birth. Specific N‐end rule pathways are also present in prokaryotes and in mitochondria. Enzymes that produce N‐degrons include methionine‐aminopeptidases, caspases, calpains, Nt‐acetylases, Nt‐amidases, arginyl‐transferases, and leucyl‐transferases. Regulated degradation of specific proteins by the N‐end rule pathway mediates a legion of physiological functions, including the sensing of heme, oxygen, and nitric oxide; selective elimination of misfolded proteins; the regulation of DNA repair, segregation, and condensation; the signaling by G proteins; the regulation of peptide import, fat metabolism, viral and bacterial infections, apoptosis, meiosis, spermatogenesis, neurogenesis, and cardiovascular development; and the functioning of adult organs, including the pancreas and the brain. Discovered 25 years ago, this pathway continues to be a fount of biological insights.     

Does N‐Terminal Protein Acetylation Lead to Protein Degradation?

The N‐end rule denotes the relationship between the identity of the amino‐terminal residue of a protein and its in vivo half‐life. Since its discovery in 1986, the N‐end rule has generally been described by a defined set of rules for determining whether an amino‐terminal residue is stabilizing or not. However, recent studies are revealing that this N‐end rule (or N‐degron concept) is less straightforward than previously appreciated. For instance, it is unveiled that N‐terminal acetylation of N‐terminal residues may create a degradation signal (Ac‐degron) that promotes the degradation of target proteins. A recent high‐throughput dissection of degrons in yeast proteins amino termini intriguingly suggested that the hydrophobicity of amino‐terminal residues—but not the N‐terminal acetylation status—may be the indispensable feature of amino‐terminal degrons. Herein, these recent advances in N‐terminal acetylation and the complexity of N‐terminal degradation signals in the context of the N‐degron pathway are analyzed.     

Modification of PATase by L/F‐transferase generates a ClpS‐dependent N‐end rule substrate in Escherichia coli

The N‐end rule pathway is conserved from bacteria to man and determines the half‐life of a protein based on its N‐terminal amino acid. In Escherichia coli, model substrates bearing an N‐degron are recognised by ClpS and degraded by ClpAP in an ATP‐dependent manner. Here, we report the isolation of 23 ClpS‐interacting proteins from E. coli. Our data show that at least one of these interacting proteins—putrescine aminotransferase (PATase)—is post‐translationally modified to generate a primary N‐degron. Remarkably, the N‐terminal modification of PATase is generated by a new specificity of leucyl/phenylalanyl‐tRNA‐protein transferase (LFTR), in which various combinations of primary destabilising residues (Leu and Phe) are attached to the N‐terminal Met. This modification (of PATase), by LFTR, is essential not only for its recognition by ClpS, but also determines the stability of the protein in vivo. Thus, the N‐end rule pathway, through the ClpAPS‐mediated turnover of PATase may have an important function in putrescine homeostasis. In addition, we have identified a new element within the N‐degron, which is required for substrate delivery to ClpA.     

The N-end rule pathway: from recognition by N-recognins, to destruction by AAA+proteases

Intracellular proteolysis is a tightly regulated process responsible for the targeted removal of unwanted or damaged proteins. The non-lysosomal removal of these proteins is performed by processive enzymes, which belong to the AAA+superfamily, such as the 26S proteasome and Clp proteases. One important protein degradation pathway, that is common to both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, is the N-end rule. In this pathway, proteins bearing a destabilizing amino acid residue at their N-terminus are degraded either by the ClpAP protease in bacteria, such as Escherichia coli or by the ubiquitin proteasome system in the eukaryotic cytoplasm. A suite of enzymes and other molecular components are also required for the successful generation, recognition and delivery of N-end rule substrates to their cognate proteases. In this review we examine the similarities and differences in the N-end rule pathway of bacterial and eukaryotic systems, focusing on the molecular determinants of this pathway.     

Altered activity, social behavior, and spatial memory in mice lacking the NTAN1p amidase and the asparagine branch of the N-end rule pathway

The N-end rule relates the in vivo half-life of a protein to the identity of its N-terminal residue. N-terminal asparagine and glutamine are tertiary destabilizing residues, in that they are enzymatically deamidated to yield secondary destabilizing residues aspartate and glutamate, which are conjugated to arginine, a primary destabilizing residue. N-terminal arginine of a substrate protein is bound by the Ubr1-encoded E3alpha, the E3 component of the ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent N-end rule pathway. We describe the construction and analysis of mouse strains lacking the asparagine-specific N-terminal amidase (Nt(N)-amidase), encoded by the Ntan1 gene. In wild-type embryos, Ntan1 was strongly expressed in the branchial arches and in the tail and limb buds. The Ntan1(-/-) mouse strains lacked the Nt(N)-amidase activity but retained glutamine-specific Nt(Q)-amidase, indicating that the two enzymes are encoded by different genes. Among the normally short-lived N-end rule substrates, only those bearing N-terminal asparagine became long-lived in Ntan1(-/-) fibroblasts. The Ntan1(-/-) mice were fertile and outwardly normal but differed from their congenic wild-type counterparts in spontaneous activity, spatial memory, and a socially conditioned exploratory phenotype that has not been previously described with other mouse strains.     

The mammalian N-end rule pathway: new insights into its components and physiological roles

The N-end rule pathway is a ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic system, in which destabilizing N-terminal residues of short-lived proteins function as an essential determinant of an N-terminal degradation signal (N-degron). An N-degron can be created from a pre-N-degron through specific N-terminal modifications, providing a means conditionally to destabilize otherwise stable polypeptides. The pathway has been found in all organisms examined, from prokaryotes to eukaryotes. Recent biochemical and proteomic studies identified many components of the mammalian N-end rule pathway, including a family of substrate recognition ubiquitin ligases and their substrates. The genetic dissection in animals and humans revealed its essential role in various vital physiological processes, ranging from cardiovascular development and meiosis to the pathogenesis of human genetic diseases. These discoveries have provided new insights into the components, functions and mechanics of this unique proteolytic system.     

Structural basis of N‐end rule substrate recognition in Escherichia coli by the ClpAP adaptor protein ClpS

In Escherichia coli, the ClpAP protease, together with the adaptor protein ClpS, is responsible for the degradation of proteins bearing an amino‐terminal destabilizing amino acid (N‐degron). Here, we determined the three‐dimensional structures of ClpS in complex with three peptides, each having a different destabilizing residue—Leu, Phe or Trp—at its N terminus. All peptides, regardless of the identity of their N‐terminal residue, are bound in a surface pocket on ClpS in a stereo‐specific manner. Several highly conserved residues in this binding pocket interact directly with the backbone of the N‐degron peptide and hence are crucial for the binding of all N‐degrons. By contrast, two hydrophobic residues define the volume of the binding pocket and influence the specificity of ClpS. Taken together, our data suggest that ClpS has been optimized for the binding and delivery of N‐degrons containing an N‐terminal Phe or Leu.     

Universality and structure of the N-end rule

Our previous work has shown that, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, any of the eight stabilizing amino-terminal residues confers a long (greater than 20 h) half-life on a test protein beta-galactosidase (beta gal), whereas 12 destabilizing amino-terminal residues confer on beta gal half-lives from less than 3 min to 30 min. We now show that an analogous single-residue code (the N-end rule) operates in an in vitro system derived from mammalian reticulocytes. We also show that the N-end rule has a hierarchical structure. Specifically, amino-terminal Glu and Asp (and also Cys in reticulocytes) are secondary destabilizing residues in that they are destabilizing through their ability to be conjugated to primary destabilizing residues such as Arg. Amino-terminal Gln and Asn are tertiary destabilizing residues in that they are destabilizing through their ability to be converted, via selective deamidation, into secondary destabilizing residues Glu and Asp. Furthermore, in reticulocytes, distinct types of the N-end-recognizing activity are shown to be specific for three classes of primary destabilizing residues: basic (Arg, Lys, His), bulky hydrophobic (Phe, Leu, Trp, Tyr), and small uncharged (Ala, Ser, Thr). Features of the N-end rule in reticulocytes suggest that the exact form of the N-end rule may depend on the cell's physiological state, thereby providing a mechanism for selective destruction of preexisting proteins upon cell differentiation.     

Identification of protein stability determinants in chloroplasts

Although chloroplast protein stability has long been recognised as a major level of post‐translational regulation in photosynthesis and gene expression, the factors determining protein stability in plastids are largely unknown. Here, we have identified stability determinants in vivo by producing plants with transgenic chloroplasts that express a reporter protein whose N‐ and C‐termini were systematically modified. We found that major stability determinants are located in the N‐terminus. Moreover, testing of all 20 amino acids in the position after the initiator methionine revealed strong differences in protein stability and indicated an important role of the penultimate N‐terminal amino acid residue in determining the protein half life. We propose that the stability of plastid proteins is largely determined by three factors: (i) the action of methionine aminopeptidase (the enzyme that removes the initiator methionine and exposes the penultimate N‐terminal amino acid residue), (ii) an N‐end rule‐like protein degradation pathway, and (iii) additional sequence determinants in the N‐terminal region.     

Protein structure prediction begins well but ends badly

The accurate prediction of protein structure, both secondary and tertiary, is an ongoing problem. Over the years, many approaches have been implemented and assessed. Most prediction algorithms start with the entire amino acid sequence and treat all residues in an identical fashion independent of sequence position. Here, we analyze blind prediction data to investigate whether predictive capability varies along the chain. Free modeling results from recent critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction (CASP) experiments are evaluated; as is the most up‐to‐date data from EVA, a fully automated blind test of secondary structure prediction servers. The results demonstrate that structure prediction accuracy is dependent on sequence position. Both secondary structure and tertiary structure predictions are more accurate in regions near the amino(N)‐terminus when compared with analogous regions near the carboxy(C)‐terminus. Eight of 10 secondary structure prediction algorithms assessed by EVA perform significantly better in regions at the N‐terminus. CASP data shows a similar bias, with N‐terminal fragments being predicted more accurately than fragments from the C‐terminus. Two analogous fragments are taken from each model, the N‐terminal fragment begins at the start of the most N‐terminal secondary structure element (SSE), whereas the C‐terminal fragment finishes at the end of the most C‐terminal SSE. Each fragment is locally superimposed onto its respective native fragment. The relative terminal prediction accuracy (RMSD) is calculated on an intramodel basis. At a fragment length of 20 residues, the N‐terminal fragment is predicted with greater accuracy in 79% of cases. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Structure of a putative ClpS N‐end rule adaptor protein from the malaria pathogen Plasmodium falciparum

The N‐end rule pathway uses an evolutionarily conserved mechanism in bacteria and eukaryotes that marks proteins for degradation by ATP‐dependent chaperones and proteases such as the Clp chaperones and proteases. Specific N‐terminal amino acids (N‐degrons) are sufficient to target substrates for degradation. In bacteria, the ClpS adaptor binds and delivers N‐end rule substrates for their degradation upon association with the ClpA/P chaperone/protease. Here, we report the first crystal structure, solved at 2.7 Å resolution, of a eukaryotic homolog of bacterial ClpS from the malaria apicomplexan parasite Plasmodium falciparum (Pfal). Despite limited sequence identity, Plasmodium ClpS is very similar to bacterial ClpS. Akin to its bacterial orthologs, plasmodial ClpS harbors a preformed hydrophobic pocket whose geometry and chemical properties are compatible with the binding of N‐degrons. However, while the N‐degron binding pocket in bacterial ClpS structures is open and accessible, the corresponding pocket in Plasmodium ClpS is occluded by a conserved surface loop that acts as a latch. Despite the closed conformation observed in the crystal, we show that, in solution, Pfal‐ClpS binds and discriminates peptides mimicking bona fide N‐end rule substrates. The presence of an apicoplast targeting peptide suggests that Pfal‐ClpS localizes to this plastid‐like organelle characteristic of all Apicomplexa and hosting most of its Clp machinery. By analogy with the related ClpS1 from plant chloroplasts and cyanobacteria, Plasmodium ClpS likely functions in association with ClpC in the apicoplast. Our findings open new venues for the design of novel anti‐malarial drugs aimed at disrupting parasite‐specific protein quality control pathways.     

Cloning and functional analysis of the arginyl-tRNA-protein transferase gene ATE1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Aminoacyl-tRNA-protein transferases (Arg-transferases) catalyze post-translational conjugation of specific amino acids to the amino termini of acceptor proteins. A function of these enzymes in eukaryotes has been shown to involve the conjugation of destabilizing amino acids to the amino termini of short-lived proteins, these reactions being a part of the N-end rule pathway of protein degradation (Gonda, D. K., Bachmair, A., Wünning, I., Tobias, J. W., Lane, W. S., and Varshavsky, A. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 16700-16712). We have cloned the ATE1 gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae which encodes arginyl-tRNA-protein transferase. ATE1 gives rise to a approximately 1.6-kilobase mRNA and codes for a 503-residue protein. Expression of the yeast ATE1 gene in Escherichia coli, which lacks Arg-transferases, was used to show that the ATE1 protein possesses the Arg-transferase activity. Null ate1 mutants are viable but lack the Arg-transferase activity and are unable to degrade those substrates of the N-end rule pathway that start with residues recognized by the Arg-transferase.     

The terminal amino acids of protein sequences and protein maturation

A comparison is made of the N- and C-terminal amino acids from 96 published protein sequences, 26 from prokaryotes, 70 from eukaryotes. The observed frequencies of the N-terminal amino acids methionine, alanine and serine in prokaryotes, and alanine and serine in eukaryotes are significantly higher than expected for a random arrangement of amino acids. At the C-terminal end, the observed frequencies of lysine, asparagine and glutamine in prokaryotes and phenylalanine, asparagine and glutamine in eukaryotes exceed random expectation. These results could be explained by specific proteolytic cleavage during protein synthesis.     

Molecular signatures of long‐lived proteins: autolytic cleavage adjacent to serine residues

The centre of the human lens, which is composed of proteins that were synthesized prior to birth, is an ideal model for the evaluation of long‐term protein stability and processes responsible for the degradation of macromolecules. By analysing the sequences of peptides present in human lens nuclei, characteristic features of intrinsic protein instability were determined. Prominent was the cleavage on the N‐terminal side of serine residues. Despite accounting for just 9% of the amino acid composition of crystallins, peptides with N‐terminal Ser represented one‐quarter of all peptides. Nonenzymatic cleavage at Ser could be reproduced by incubating peptides at elevated temperatures. Serine residues may thus represent susceptible sites for autolysis in polypeptides exposed to physiological conditions over a period of years. Once these sites are cleaved, other chemical processes result in progressive removal or ‘laddering’ of amino acid residues from newly exposed N‐ and C‐termini. As N‐terminal Ser peptides originated from several crystallins with unrelated sequences, this may represent a general feature of long‐lived proteins.     

The N-end rule pathway for regulated proteolysis: prokaryotic and eukaryotic strategies

The N-end rule states that the half-life of a protein is determined by the nature of its N-terminal residue. This fundamental principle of regulated proteolysis is conserved from bacteria to mammals. Although prokaryotes and eukaryotes employ distinct proteolytic machineries for degradation of N-end rule substrates, recent findings indicate that they share common principles of substrate recognition. In eukaryotes substrate recognition is mediated by N-recognins, a class of E3 ligases that labels N-end rule substrates via covalent linkage to ubiquitin, allowing the subsequent substrate delivery to the 26S proteasome. In bacteria, the adaptor protein ClpS exhibits homology to the substrate binding site of N-recognin. ClpS binds to the destabilizing N-termini of N-end rule substrates and directly transfers them to the ClpAP protease.     

The N-end rule pathway controls the import of peptides through degradation of a transcriptional repressor.

Ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic systems underlie many processes, including the cell cycle, cell differentiation and responses to stress. One such system is the N-end rule pathway, which targets proteins bearing destabilizing N-terminal residues. Here we report that Ubr1p, the main recognition component of this pathway, regulates peptide import in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae through degradation of Cup9p, a 35 kDa homeodomain protein. Cup9p was identified using a screen for mutants that bypass the previously observed requirement for Ubr1p in peptide import. We show that Cup9p is a short-lived protein (t1/2 approximately 5 min) whose degradation requires Ubr1p. Cup9p acts as a repressor of PTR2, a gene encoding the transmembrane peptide transporter. In contrast to engineered N-end rule substrates, which are recognized by Ubr1p through their destabilizing N-terminal residues, Cup9p is targeted by Ubr1p through an internal degradation signal. The Ubr1p-Cup9p-Ptr2p circuit is the first example of a physiological process controlled by the N-end rule pathway. An earlier study identified Cup9p as a protein required for an aspect of resistance to copper toxicity in S.cerevisiae. Thus, one physiological substrate of the N-end rule pathway functions as both a repressor of peptide import and a regulator of copper homeostasis.