Dual control of ROS1‐mediated active DNA demethylation by DNA damage‐binding protein 2 (DDB2)

By controlling gene expression, DNA methylation contributes to key regulatory processes during plant development. Genomic methylation patterns are dynamic and must be properly maintained and/or re‐established upon DNA replication and active removal, and therefore require sophisticated control mechanisms. Here we identify direct interplay between the DNA repair factor DNA damage‐binding protein 2 (DDB2) and the ROS1‐mediated active DNA demethylation pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. We show that DDB2 forms a complex with ROS1 and AGO4 and that they act at the ROS1 locus to modulate levels of DNA methylation and therefore ROS1 expression. We found that DDB2 represses enzymatic activity of ROS1. DNA demethylation intermediates generated by ROS1 are processed by the DNA 3′‐phosphatase ZDP and the apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease APE1L, and we also show that DDB2 interacts with both enzymes and stimulates their activities. Taken together, our results indicate that DDB2 acts as a critical regulator of ROS1‐mediated active DNA demethylation.     

Overexpression of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis</Emphasis> damaged DNA binding protein 1A (DDB1A) enhances UV tolerance

Damaged DNA Binding protein 1 (DDB1) is a conserved protein and a component of multiple cellular complexes. Arabidopsis has two homologues of DDB1: DDB1A and DDB1B. In this study we examine the role of DDB1A in Arabidopsis UV tolerance and DNA repair using a DDB1A null mutant (ddb1a) and overexpression lines. DDB1A overexpression lines showed higher levels of UV-resistance than wild-type in a range of assays as well as faster DNA repair. However a significant difference between wild-type plants and ddb1a mutants was only observed immediately following UV treatment in root length and photoproduct repair assays. DDB1A and DDB1B mRNA levels increased 3 h after UV exposure and DDB1A is required for UV regulation of DDB1B and DDB2 mRNA levels. In conclusion, while DDB1A is sufficient to increase Arabidopsis UV tolerance, it is only necessary for immediate response to UV damage.     

The conserved factor DE-ETIOLATED 1 cooperates with CUL4-DDB1DDB2 to maintain genome integrity upon UV stress

Plants and many other eukaryotes can make use of two major pathways to cope with mutagenic effects of light, photoreactivation and nucleotide excision repair (NER). While photoreactivation allows direct repair by photolyase enzymes using light energy, NER requires a stepwise mechanism with several protein complexes acting at the levels of lesion detection, DNA incision and resynthesis. Here we investigated the involvement in NER of DE-ETIOLATED 1 (DET1), an evolutionarily conserved factor that associates with components of the ubiquitylation machinery in plants and mammals and acts as a negative repressor of light-driven photomorphogenic development in Arabidopsis. Evidence is provided that plant DET1 acts with CULLIN4-based ubiquitin E3 ligase, and that appropriate dosage of DET1 protein is necessary for efficient removal of UV photoproducts through the NER pathway. Moreover, DET1 is required for CULLIN4-dependent targeted degradation of the UV-lesion recognition factor DDB2. Finally, DET1 protein is degraded concomitantly with DDB2 upon UV irradiation in a CUL4-dependent mechanism. Altogether, these data suggest that DET1 and DDB2 cooperate during the excision repair process.     

Cellular concentrations of DDB2 regulate dynamic binding of DDB1 at UV-induced DNA damage

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the principal pathway for counteracting cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of UV irradiation. To provide insight into the in vivo regulation of the DNA damage recognition step of global genome NER (GG-NER), we constructed cell lines expressing fluorescently tagged damaged DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1). DDB1 is a core subunit of a number of cullin 4-RING ubiquitin ligase complexes. UV-activated DDB1-DDB2-CUL4A-ROC1 ubiquitin ligase participates in the initiation of GG-NER and triggers the UV-dependent degradation of its subunit DDB2. We found that DDB1 rapidly accumulates on DNA damage sites. However, its binding to damaged DNA is not static, since DDB1 constantly dissociates from and binds to DNA lesions. DDB2, but not CUL4A, was indispensable for binding of DDB1 to DNA damage sites. The residence time of DDB1 on the damage site is independent of the main damage-recognizing protein of GG-NER, XPC, as well as of UV-induced proteolysis of DDB2. The amount of DDB1 that is temporally immobilized on damaged DNA critically depends on DDB2 levels in the cell. We propose a model in which UV-dependent degradation of DDB2 is important for the release of DDB1 from continuous association to unrepaired DNA and makes DDB1 available for its other DNA damage response functions.     

Monitoring Repair of UV-Induced 6-4-Photoproducts with a Purified DDB2 Protein Complex

Because cells are constantly subjected to DNA damaging insults, DNA repair pathways are critical for genome integrity [1]. DNA damage recognition protein complexes (DRCs) recognize DNA damage and initiate DNA repair. The DNA-Damage Binding protein 2 (DDB2) complex is a DRC that initiates nucleotide excision repair (NER) of DNA damage caused by ultraviolet light (UV) [2]–[4]. Using a purified DDB2 DRC, we created a probe (“DDB2 proteo-probe”) that hybridizes to nuclei of cells irradiated with UV and not to cells exposed to other genotoxins. The DDB2 proteo-probe recognized UV-irradiated DNA in classical laboratory assays, including cyto- and histo-chemistry, flow cytometry, and slot-blotting. When immobilized, the proteo-probe also bound soluble UV-irradiated DNA in ELISA-like and DNA pull-down assays. In vitro, the DDB2 proteo-probe preferentially bound 6-4-photoproducts [(6-4)PPs] rather than cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs). We followed UV-damage repair by cyto-chemistry in cells fixed at different time after UV irradiation, using either the DDB2 proteo-probe or antibodies against CPDs, or (6-4)PPs. The signals obtained with the DDB2 proteo-probe and with the antibody against (6-4)PPs decreased in a nearly identical manner. Since (6-4)PPs are repaired only by nucleotide excision repair (NER), our results strongly suggest the DDB2 proteo-probe hybridizes to DNA containing (6-4)PPs and allows monitoring of their removal during NER. We discuss the general use of purified DRCs as probes, in lieu of antibodies, to recognize and monitor DNA damage and repair.     

Endothelin‐1 and α‐melanocortin have redundant effects on global genome repair in UV‐irradiated human melanocytes despite distinct signaling pathways

Human melanocyte homeostasis is sustained by paracrine factors that reduce the genotoxic effects of ultraviolet radiation (UV), the major etiological factor for melanoma. The keratinocyte‐derived endothelin‐1 (End‐1) and α‐melanocyte‐stimulating hormone (α‐MSH) regulate human melanocyte function, proliferation and survival, and enhance repair of UV‐induced DNA photoproducts by binding to the G_q‐ and G_i‐protein‐coupled endothelin B receptor (EDNRB), and the G_s‐protein‐coupled melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R), respectively. We hereby report that End‐1 and α‐MSH regulate common effectors of the DNA damage response to UV, despite distinct signaling pathways. Both factors activate the two DNA damage sensors ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3‐related and ataxia telangiectasia mutated, enhance DNA damage recognition by reducing soluble nuclear and chromatin‐bound DNA damage binding protein 2, and increase total and chromatin‐bound xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) C. Additionally, α‐MSH and End‐1 increase total levels and chromatin localization of the damage verification protein XPA, and the levels of γH2AX, which facilitates recruitment of DNA repair proteins to DNA lesions. Activation of EDNRB compensates for MC1R loss of function, thereby reducing the risk of malignant transformation of these vulnerable melanocytes. Therefore, MC1R and EDNRB signaling pathways represent redundant mechanisms that inhibit the genotoxic effects of UV and melanomagenesis.     

A RAD52‐like single‐stranded DNA binding protein affects mitochondrial DNA repair by recombination

The plant mitochondrial DNA‐binding protein ODB1 was identified from a mitochondrial extract after DNA‐affinity purification. ODB1 (organellar DNA‐binding protein 1) co‐purified with WHY2, a mitochondrial member of the WHIRLY family of plant‐specific proteins involved in the repair of organellar DNA. The Arabidopsis thaliana ODB1 gene is identical to RAD52‐1, which encodes a protein functioning in homologous recombination in the nucleus but additionally localizing to mitochondria. We confirmed the mitochondrial localization of ODB1 by in vitro and in vivo import assays, as well as by immunodetection on Arabidopsis subcellular fractions. In mitochondria, WHY2 and ODB1 were found in large nucleo‐protein complexes. Both proteins co‐immunoprecipitated in a DNA‐dependent manner. In vitro assays confirmed DNA binding by ODB1 and showed that the protein has higher affinity for single‐stranded than for double‐stranded DNA. ODB1 showed no sequence specificity in vitro. In vivo, DNA co‐immunoprecipitation indicated that ODB1 binds sequences throughout the mitochondrial genome. ODB1 promoted annealing of complementary DNA sequences, suggesting a RAD52‐like function as a recombination mediator. Arabidopsis odb1 mutants were morphologically indistinguishable from the wild‐type, but following DNA damage by genotoxic stress, they showed reduced mitochondrial homologous recombination activity. Under the same conditions, the odb1 mutants showed an increase in illegitimate repair bypasses generated by microhomology‐mediated recombination. These observations identify ODB1 as a further component of homologous recombination‐dependent DNA repair in plant mitochondria.     

α‐MSH tripeptide analogs activate the melanocortin 1 receptor and reduce UV‐induced DNA damage in human melanocytes

One skin cancer prevention strategy that we are developing is based on synthesizing and testing melanocortin analogs that reduce and repair DNA damage resulting from exposure to solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation, in addition to stimulating pigmentation. Previously, we reported the effects of tetrapeptide analogs of α‐melanocortin (α‐MSH) that were more potent and stable than the physiological α‐MSH, and mimicked its photoprotective effects against UV‐induced DNA damage in human melanocytes. Here, we report on a panel of tripeptide analogs consisting of a modified α‐MSH core His⁶‐d ‐Phe⁷‐Arg⁸, which contained different N‐capping groups, C‐terminal modifications, or arginine mimics. The most potent tripeptides in activating cAMP formation and tyrosinase of human melanocytes were three analogs with C‐terminal modifications. The most effective C‐terminal tripeptide mimicked α‐MSH in reducing hydrogen peroxide generation and enhancing nucleotide excision repair following UV irradiation. The effects of these three analogs required functional MC1R, as they were absent in human melanocytes that expressed non‐functional receptor. These results demonstrate activation of the MC1R by tripeptide melanocortin analogs. Designing small analogs for topical delivery should prove practical and efficacious for skin cancer prevention.     

Human DDB2 splicing variants are dominant negative inhibitors of UV-damaged DNA repair

Damaged DNA-binding protein (DDB) is a heterodimer (DDB1 and DDB2), which is implicated in the repair of UV-irradiated DNA damage. Here we have identified four DDB2 variants from HeLa cells (D1-D4) that are generated by alternative splicing. Analysis of tissue distribution by RT-PCR indicates that D1 is the most highly expressed in human brain and heart. A DNA repair assay revealed that both D1 and D2 are dominant negative inhibitors. Electrophoresis mobility shift assays indicated that D1 and D2 are not part of the damaged DNA-protein complex. Co-immunoprecipitation studies show that DDB2-WT interacts with D1 and itself. Nuclear import of DDB1 was less induced by transfection with D1 than WT. Based on these results, D1 and D2 are dominant negative inhibitors of DNA repair, which is probably due to disruption of complex formation between DDB1 and DDB2-WT and of DDB1 nuclear import.     

Arabidopsis ZDP DNA 3′‐phosphatase and ARP endonuclease function in 8‐oxoG repair initiated by FPG and OGG1 DNA glycosylases

Oxidation of guanine in DNA generates 7,8‐dihydro‐8‐oxoguanine (8‐oxoG), an ubiquitous lesion with mutagenic properties. 8‐oxoG is primarily removed by DNA glycosylases distributed in two families, typified by bacterial Fpg proteins and eukaryotic Ogg1 proteins. Interestingly, plants possess both Fpg and Ogg1 homologs but their relative contributions to 8‐oxoG repair remain uncertain. In this work we used Arabidopsis cell‐free extracts to monitor 8‐oxoG repair in wild‐type and mutant plants. We found that both FPG and OGG1 catalyze excision of 8‐oxoG in Arabidopsis cell extracts by a DNA glycosylase/lyase mechanism, and generate repair intermediates with blocked 3′‐termini. An increase in oxidative damage is detected in both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA from double fpg ogg1 mutants, but not in single mutants, which suggests that a single deficiency in one of these DNA glycosylases may be compensated by the other. We also found that the DNA 3′‐phosphatase ZDP (zinc finger DNA 3′‐phosphoesterase) and the AP(apurinic/apyirmidinic) endonuclease ARP(apurinic endonuclease redox protein) are required in the 8‐oxoG repair pathway to process the 3′‐blocking ends generated by FPG and OGG1. Furthermore, deficiencies in ZDP and/or ARP decrease germination ability after seed deteriorating conditions. Altogether, our results suggest that Arabidopsis cells use both FPG and OGG1 to repair 8‐oxoG in a pathway that requires ZDP and ARP in downstream steps.     

The deubiquitinating protein USP24 interacts with DDB2 and regulates DDB2 stability

Damage-specific DNA-binding protein 2 (DDB2) was first isolated as a subunit of the UV-DDB heterodimeric complex that is involved in DNA damage recognition in the nucleotide excision repair pathway (NER). DDB2 is required for efficient repair of CPDs in chromatin and is a component of the CRL4^DDB2 E3 ligase that targets XPC, histones and DDB2 itself for ubiquitination. In this study, a yeast two-hybrid screening of a human cDNA library was performed to identify potential DDB2 cellular partners. We identified a deubiquitinating enzyme, USP24, as a likely DDB2-interacting partner. Interaction between DDB2 and USP24 was confirmed by co-precipitation. Importantly, knockdown of USP24 in two human cell lines decreased the steady-state levels of DDB2, indicating that USP24-mediated DDB2 deubiquitination prevents DDB2 degradation. In addition, we demonstrated that USP24 can cleave an ubiquitinated form of DDB2 in vitro. Taken together, our results suggest that the ubiquitin-specific protease USP24 is a novel regulator of DDB2 stability.     

The deubiquitinating protein USP24 interacts with DDB2 and regulates DDB2 stability

Damage-specific DNA-binding protein 2 (DDB2) was first isolated as a subunit of the UV-DDB heterodimeric complex that is involved in DNA damage recognition in the nucleotide excision repair pathway (NER). DDB2 is required for efficient repair of CPDs in chromatin and is a component of the CRL4^DDB2 E3 ligase that targets XPC, histones and DDB2 itself for ubiquitination. In this study, a yeast two-hybrid screening of a human cDNA library was performed to identify potential DDB2 cellular partners. We identified a deubiquitinating enzyme, USP24, as a likely DDB2-interacting partner. Interaction between DDB2 and USP24 was confirmed by co-precipitation. Importantly, knockdown of USP24 in two human cell lines decreased the steady-state levels of DDB2, indicating that USP24-mediated DDB2 deubiquitination prevents DDB2 degradation. In addition, we demonstrated that USP24 can cleave an ubiquitinated form of DDB2 in vitro. Taken together, our results suggest that the ubiquitin-specific protease USP24 is a novel regulator of DDB2 stability.     

MHF1 plays Fanconi anaemia complementation group M protein (FANCM)‐dependent and FANCM‐independent roles in DNA repair and homologous recombination in plants

Fanconi anaemia complementation group M protein (FANCM), a component of the human Fanconi anemia pathway, acts as DNA translocase that is essential during the repair of DNA interstrand cross‐links. The DNA‐damage‐binding function of FANCM is strongly enhanced by the histone fold‐containing FANCM‐associated protein MHF1. We identified a single homologue of MHF1 in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Similar to the loss of AtFANCM, the loss of AtMHF1 leads to several meiotic defects, such as chromosome bridges between bivalents and an unequal distribution of chromosomes. Moreover, MHF1, together with FANCM, is involved in interstrand cross‐link repair in plants. This phenotype is detectable only in double mutants of the RecQ helicase and BLM homologue RECQ4A, which appears to function in a parallel pathway to the FANCM/MHF1 complex. However, in somatic cells, FANCM has an MHF1‐independent function in replicative repair in a parallel pathway to the endonuclease MUS81. Furthermore, MHF1 is required for efficient somatic homologous recombination (HR) – a role antagonistic to FANCM. FANCM and RECQ4A define two parallel pathways of HR suppression in Arabidopsis. Hyperrecombination in the fancm but not the recq4A mutant can be abolished by MHF1 mutations. This finding indicates that MHF1 and FANCM act at different steps of a single, common, HR pathway.     

Single‐nucleotide and long‐patch base excision repair of DNA damage in plants

Base excision repair (BER) is a critical pathway in cellular defense against endogenous or exogenous DNA damage. This elaborate multistep process is initiated by DNA glycosylases that excise the damaged base, and continues through the concerted action of additional proteins that finally restore DNA to the unmodified state. BER has been subject to detailed biochemical analysis in bacteria, yeast and animals, mainly through in vitro reproduction of the entire repair reaction in cell‐free extracts. However, an understanding of this repair pathway in plants has consistently lagged behind. We report the extension of BER biochemical analysis to plants, using Arabidopsis cell extracts to monitor repair of DNA base damage in vitro. We have used this system to demonstrate that Arabidopsis cell extracts contain the enzymatic machinery required to completely repair ubiquitous DNA lesions, such as uracil and abasic (AP) sites. Our results reveal that AP sites generated after uracil excision are processed both by AP endonucleases and AP lyases, generating either 5′‐ or 3′‐blocked ends, respectively. We have also found that gap filling and ligation may proceed either through insertion of just one nucleotide (short‐patch BER) or several nucleotides (long‐patch BER). This experimental system should prove useful in the biochemical and genetic dissection of BER in plants, and contribute to provide a broader picture of the evolution and biological relevance of DNA repair pathways.     

The DNA translocase RAD5A acts independently of the other main DNA repair pathways,and requires both its ATPase and RING domain for activity in Arabidopsis thaliana

Multiple pathways exist to repair DNA damage induced by methylating and crosslinking agents in Arabidopsis thaliana. The SWI2/SNF2 translocase RAD5A, the functional homolog of budding yeast Rad5 that is required for the error‐free branch of post‐replicative repair, plays a surprisingly prominent role in the repair of both kinds of lesions in Arabidopsis. Here we show that both the ATPase domain and the ubiquitination function of the RING domain of the Arabidopsis protein are essential for the cellular response to different forms of DNA damage. To define the exact role of RAD5A within the complex network of DNA repair pathways, we crossed the rad5a mutant line with mutants of different known repair factors of Arabidopsis. We had previously shown that RAD5A acts independently of two main pathways of replication‐associated DNA repair defined by the helicase RECQ4A and the endonuclease MUS81. The enhanced sensitivity of all double mutants tested in this study indicates that the repair of damaged DNA by RAD5A also occurs independently of nucleotide excision repair (AtRAD1), single‐strand break repair (AtPARP1), as well as microhomology‐mediated double‐strand break repair (AtTEB). Moreover, RAD5A can partially complement for a deficient AtATM‐mediated DNA damage response in plants, as the double mutant shows phenotypic growth defects.