Comparison of soil respiration methods in a mid-latitude deciduous forest

In forest ecosystems the single largest respiratory flux influencing net ecosystem productivity (NEP) is the total soil CO₂ efflux; however, it is difficult to make measurements of this flux that are accurate at the ecosystem scale. We examined patterns of soil CO₂ efflux using five different methods: auto-chambers, portable gas analyzers, eddy covariance along and two models parameterized with the observed data. The relation between soil temperature and soil moisture with soil CO₂ effluxes are also investigated, both inter-annually and seasonally, using these observations/results. Soil respiration rates (R _soil) are greatest during the growing season when soil temperatures are between 15 and 25 °C, but some soil CO₂ efflux occurs throughout the year. Measured soil respiration was sensitive to soil temperature, particularly during the spring and fall. All measurement methods produced similar annual estimates. Depending on the time of the year, the eddy covariance (flux tower) estimate for ecosystem respiration is similar to or slightly lower than estimates of annual soil CO₂ efflux from the other methods. As the eddy covariance estimate includes foliar and stem respiration which the other methods do not; it was expected to be larger (perhaps 15–30%). The auto-chamber system continuously measuring soil CO₂ efflux rates provides a level of temporal resolution that permits investigation of short- to longer term influences of factors on these efflux rates. The expense of building and maintaining an auto chamber system may not be necessary for those researchers interested in estimating R _soil annually, but auto-chambers do allow the capture of data from all seasons needed for model parameterization.     

Base Cation Cycling in a Pristine Watershed of the Canadian Boreal Forest

In forest ecosystems the single largest respiratory flux influencing net ecosystem productivity (NEP) is the total soil CO₂ efflux; however, it is difficult to make measurements of this flux that are accurate at the ecosystem scale. We examined patterns of soil CO₂ efflux using five different methods: auto-chambers, portable gas analyzers, eddy covariance along and two models parameterized with the observed data. The relation between soil temperature and soil moisture with soil CO₂ effluxes are also investigated, both inter-annually and seasonally, using these observations/results. Soil respiration rates (R _soil) are greatest during the growing season when soil temperatures are between 15 and 25 °C, but some soil CO₂ efflux occurs throughout the year. Measured soil respiration was sensitive to soil temperature, particularly during the spring and fall. All measurement methods produced similar annual estimates. Depending on the time of the year, the eddy covariance (flux tower) estimate for ecosystem respiration is similar to or slightly lower than estimates of annual soil CO₂ efflux from the other methods. As the eddy covariance estimate includes foliar and stem respiration which the other methods do not; it was expected to be larger (perhaps 15–30%). The auto-chamber system continuously measuring soil CO₂ efflux rates provides a level of temporal resolution that permits investigation of short- to longer term influences of factors on these efflux rates. The expense of building and maintaining an auto chamber system may not be necessary for those researchers interested in estimating R _soil annually, but auto-chambers do allow the capture of data from all seasons needed for model parameterization.     

Seasonal patterns of soil CO2 efflux and soil air CO2 concentration in a Scots pine forest: comparison of two chamber techniques

A non‐vented non‐steady state flow‐through chamber and a non‐vented non‐steady state non‐flow‐through chamber technique were used to measure CO₂ efflux of a young Scots pine forest on a fertile till soil in southern Finland. Soil temperature, soil moisture and soil CO₂ concentration were measured concurrently with CO₂ efflux for two and a half successive years. The CO₂ efflux showed a seasonal pattern, effluxes ranging from low 0.0–0.1 g CO₂ m ^{? 2} h ^{? 1} in winter to peak values of 2.3 g CO₂ m ^{? 2} h ^{? 1} occurring in late June and in July. The daily average effluxes in July measured by flow through chambers were 1.23 and 0.98 g CO₂ m ^{? 2} h ^{? 1} in 1998 and 1999, respectively. The annual accumulated CO₂ efflux was 3117 and 3326 g CO₂ m ^{? 2} in 1998 and 1999, respectively. The spatial variation in CO₂ efflux was high (CV 0.18–0.45) and increased with increasing efflux. Soil air CO₂ concentration showed similar seasonal pattern the peak concentrations occurring in July–August. The CO₂ concentrations ranged from 580 to 780 µ mol mol ^{? 1} in the humus layer to 13 620–14 470 µ mol mol ^{? 1} in the C‐horizon. In winter the soil air CO₂ concentrations were lower, especially in deeper soil layers. Drought decreased CO₂ efflux and soil air CO₂ concentration. The in situ comparison on forest soil between the chamber methods showed the non‐flow‐through chamber to give ～～50% lower efflux values than that of the flow‐through chamber. When calibrated against known CO₂ efflux ranging from 0.4 to 0.8 g CO₂ m ^{? 2} h ^{? 1} generated with a diffusion box method developed by Widén and Lindroth [Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Suecia Silvestria, 2001], the flow‐through chamber gave equal effluxes at the lower end of the calibration range, but overestimated high effluxes by 20%. Non‐flow‐through chamber underestimated the CO₂ efflux by 30%.     

Soil CO2 efflux in contrasting boreal deciduous and coniferous stands and its contribution to the ecosystem carbon balance

Similar nonsteady‐state automated chamber systems were used to measure and partition soil CO₂ efflux in contrasting deciduous (trembling aspen) and coniferous (black spruce and jack pine) stands located within 100 km of each other near the southern edge of the Boreal forest in Canada. The stands were exposed to similar climate forcing in 2003, including marked seasonal variations in soil water availability, which provided a unique opportunity to investigate the influence of climate and stand characteristics on soil CO₂ efflux and to quantify its contribution to the net ecosystem CO₂ exchange (NEE) as measured with the eddy‐covariance technique. Partitioning of soil CO₂ efflux between soil respiration (including forest‐floor vegetation) and forest‐floor photosynthesis showed that short‐ and long‐term temporal variations of soil CO₂ efflux were related to the influence of (1) soil temperature and water content on soil respiration and (2) below‐canopy light availability, plant water status and forest‐floor plant species composition on forest‐floor photosynthesis. Overall, the three stands were weak to moderate sinks for CO₂ in 2003 (NEE of ?103, ?80 and ?28 g C m^?2 yr^?1 for aspen, black spruce and jack pine, respectively). Forest‐floor respiration accounted for 86%, 73% and 75% of annual ecosystem respiration, in the three respective stands, while forest‐floor photosynthesis contributed to 11% and 14% of annual gross ecosystem photosynthesis in the black spruce and jack pine stands, respectively. The results emphasize the need to perform concomitant measurements of NEE and soil CO₂ efflux at longer time scales in different ecosystems in order to better understand the impacts of future interannual climate variability and vegetation dynamics associated with climate change on each component of the carbon balance.     

Precipitation pulses enhance respiration of Mediterranean ecosystems: the balance between organic and inorganic components of increased soil CO2 efflux

In regions characterized by arid seasons, such as the Mediterranean basin, soil moisture is a major driver of ecosystem CO₂ efflux during periods of drought stress. Here, a rain event can induce a disproportional respiratory pulse, releasing an amount of CO₂ to the atmosphere that may significantly contribute to the annual ecosystem carbon balance. The mechanisms behind this pulse are unclear, and it is still unknown whether it is due to the stimulation of autotrophic, heterotrophic and/or inorganic CO₂ fluxes. On the Mediterranean island of Pianosa, eddy flux measurements showed respiratory pulses after rain events following prolonged drought periods, which occurred in the summer of 2003 and 2006. To investigate the mechanisms of this observed enhanced respiration fluxes and partition of the soil CO₂ sources, two water manipulation experiments were performed. The first was designed to estimate the effect of soil rewetting on soil CO₂ efflux, in the different ecosystem types existing on the island (i.e. woodland, ex‐agricultural and Mediterranean shrubland). The second was a soil CO₂ partitioning experiment to investigate the relative contribution of inorganic and organic CO₂ sources to soil respiration, under dry and wet soil conditions. Our results suggest that the pulse in the CO₂ efflux is primarily due to the enhancement of heterotrophic respiration, likely caused by the degradation of easily decomposable substrates, accumulated in soils during the dry period. In fact, the vegetation at the site was senescent and did not play any significant role in CO₂ exchange, as suggested by the absence of diurnal CO₂ uptake in eddy covariance measurements. In addition, soil rewetting did not significantly enhance inorganic CO₂ efflux.     

Cultivation of a perennial grass for bioenergy on a boreal organic soil – carbon sink or source?

The area under the cultivation of perennial bioenergy crops on organic soils in the northern countries is fast increasing. To understand the impact of reed canary grass (RCG, Phalaris arundinaceae L.) cultivation on the carbon dioxide (CO₂) balance of an organic soil, net ecosystem CO₂ exchange (NEE) was measured for four years in a RCG cultivated cutover peatland in eastern Finland using the eddy covariance technique. There were striking differences among the years in the annual precipitation. The annual precipitation was higher during 2004 and 2007 and lower during 2005 and 2006 than the 1971–2000 regional mean. During wet growing seasons, moderate temperatures, high surface soil moisture and low evaporative demand favoured high CO₂ uptake. During dry seasons, owing to soil moisture and atmospheric stress, photosynthetic activity was severely restricted. The CO₂ uptake [gross primary productivity (GPP)] was positively correlated with soil moisture, air temperature and inversely with vapour pressure deficit. Total ecosystem respiration (TER) increased with increasing soil temperature but decreased with increasing soil moisture. The relative responses of GPP and TER to moisture stress were different. While changes in TER for a given change in soil moisture were moderate, variations in GPP were drastic. Also, the seasonal variations in TER were not as conspicuous as those in GPP implying that GPP is the primary regulator of the interannual variability in NEE in this ecosystem. The ecosystem accumulated a total of 398 g C m^?2 from the beginning of 2004 until the end of 2007. It retained some carbon during a wet year such as 2004 even after accounting for the loss of carbon in the form of harvested biomass. Based on this CO₂ balance analysis, RCG cultivation is found to be a promising after‐use option on an organic soil.     

Carbon balance of different aged Scots pine forests in Southern Finland

We estimated annual net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of a chronosequence of four Scots pine stands in southern Finland during years 2000–2002 using eddy covariance (EC). Net ecosystem productivity (NEP) was estimated using growth measurements and modelled mass losses of woody debris. The stands were 4, 12, 40 and 75 years old. The 4‐year‐old clearcut was a source of carbon throughout the year combining a low gross primary productivity (GPP) with a total ecosystem respiration (TER) similar to the forest stands. The annual NEE of the clearcut, measured by EC, was 386 g C m^?2. Tree growth was negligible and the estimated NEP was ?262 g C m^?2 a^?1. The annual GPPs at the other sites were close to each other (928?1072 g C m^?2 a^?1), but TER differed markedly, being greatest at the 12‐year‐old site (905 g C m^?2 a^?1) and smallest in the 75‐year‐old stand (616 g C m^?2 a^?1). Measurements of soil CO₂ efflux showed that different rates of soil respiration largely explained the differences in TER. The NEE and NEP of the 12‐year‐old stand were close to zero. The forested stands were sinks of carbon. They had similar annual patterns of carbon exchange and half‐hourly eddy fluxes were highly correlated, indicating similar responses to the environment. The NEE in the 40‐year‐old stand varied between ?179 and –192 g C m^?2 a^?1, while NEP was between 214 and 242 g C m^?2 a^?1. The annual NEE of the 75‐year‐old stand was 323 g C m^?2 and NEP was 252 g C m^?2. This indicates that there was no reduction in carbon sink strength with stand age.     

腾格里荒漠红砂-珍珠群落CO2收支变化及其不同观测方法间的比较

由于荒漠生态系统植被覆盖度低、生产力低下,其在全球碳循环中的作用被长期忽视。为探讨荒漠生态系统碳收支各组分的变化规律,以腾格里荒漠红砂(Reaumuria soongorica Maxim.)-珍珠(Salsola passerina Beg.)群落为研究对象,采用静态箱式法研究了该群落的净生态系统CO2交换量(NEE)、生态系统呼吸、土壤呼吸的日变化规律,同时将该方法所获得的NEE结果与涡动相关法观测的结果进行了比较。结果表明:(1)红砂-珍珠群落NEE的日变化表现为,在6:00—9:00左右出现一个CO2吸收的高峰值,随后在12:00—15:00左右出现一个CO2释放高峰值。红砂种群、珍珠种群和整个群落NEE的平均值分别为0.018、0.020和0.028 mg CO2m-2s-1;(2)红砂种群、珍珠种群、土壤及整个群落生态系统呼吸速率的日变化规律一致,均表现为明显的单峰变化趋势,在12:00—15:00左右出现一个CO2释放的高峰值。红砂种群、珍珠种群、土壤和整个群落的生态系统呼吸的平均值分别为:0.121、0.062、0.029和0.040 mg CO2m-2s-1。以盖度为加权因子计算得到红砂种群、珍珠种群和土壤呼吸占生态系统呼吸的比例分别为:9%、21%和70%,由此可见,生态系统呼吸主要来源于土壤呼吸。(3)将箱式法和涡动相关法观测的NEE进行比较,结果表明两种方法观测的NEE变化规律基本一致,相关系数达到0.7。采用箱式法观测的NEE高于涡动相关法观测的结果,平均值分别0.028 mg CO2m-2s-1(箱式法)和0.015 mg CO2m-2s-1(涡动相关法),涡动相关法的观测结果与箱式法观测结果的比值为0.54。综上可得,荒漠生态系统土壤呼吸的变化速率决定了生态系统呼吸的变化规律,采用箱式法可能高估了荒漠生态系统CO2的释放量。     

Soil CO2 efflux measurements in a mixed forest: impact of chamber disturbances,spatial variability and seasonal evolution

A closed‐dynamic‐chamber system (CDCS) was used to measure the spatial and seasonal variability of the soil CO₂ efflux (F_s) in beech and in Douglas fir patches of the Vielsalm forest (Belgium). First the difference between natural and measured soil CO₂ efflux induced by the presence of the CDCS was studied. The impact on the measurements of the pressure difference between the outside (natural condition) and the inside of the chamber was found to be small (0.4%). The influence of wind disturbance in the closed chamber was tested by comparison with an open‐chamber system characterized by a different wind distribution. A very good correlation between the two systems was found (r² = 0.99) but the open system yielded slightly lower fluxes than the closed one (slope = 0.88 ± 0.05). A measurement procedure has been developed to minimize the effect of the other sources of perturbation. The spatial and seasonal evolution of the soil CO₂ efflux was obtained by performing regular measurements on 29 spots in the beech patch over a period of 12 months and on 24 spots in the Douglas fir patch over 8 months. For each spot, the experimental relationship between Fs and soil temperature was compared with the fitted line for an Arrhenius relationship with a soil temperature‐dependent activation energy. Soil temperature explains 73% of the seasonal variation for all the data. The spatial average of the soil CO₂ efflux at 10 °C (Fs₁₀) in the beech patch is 2.57 ± 0.41 μmol m^?2 s^?1, approximately twice the average in the Douglas fir patch recorded at 1.42 ± 0.22 μmol m^?2 s^?1. The litter fall analysis seems to indicate that soil organic matter quality and quantity may be one the reasons for this difference. Finally the annual soil CO₂ efflux was calculated for the beech and Douglas fir patches (870 ± 140 and 438 ± 68 gC m^?2 y^?1, respectively). The beech value would represent 92 ± 15% of the annual ecosystem respiration estimated from the eddy covariance measurements.     

Soil CO2 efflux in a tropical forest in the central Amazon

This study investigated the spatial and temporal variation in soil carbon dioxide (CO₂) efflux and its relationship with soil temperature, soil moisture and rainfall in a forest near Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. The mean rate of efflux was 6.45±0.25 SE μmol CO₂ m^?2s^?1 at 25.6±0.22 SE°C (5 cm depth) ranging from 4.35 to 9.76 μmol CO₂ m^?2s^?1; diel changes in efflux were correlated with soil temperature (r²=0.60). However, the efflux response to the diel cycle in temperature was not always a clear exponential function. During period of low soil water content, temperature in deeper layers had a better relationship with CO₂ efflux than with the temperature nearer the soil surface. Soil water content may limit CO₂ production during the drying‐down period that appeared to be an important factor controlling the efflux rate (r²=0.39). On the other hand, during the rewetting period microbial activity may be the main controlling factor, which may quickly induce very high rates of efflux. The CO₂ flux chamber was adapted to mimic the effects of rainfall on soil CO₂ efflux and the results showed that efflux rates reduced 30% immediately after a rainfall event. Measurements of the CO₂ concentration gradient in the soil profile showed a buildup in the concentration of CO₂ after rain on the top soil. This higher CO₂ concentration developed shortly after rainfall when the soil pores in the upper layers were filled with water, which created a barrier for gas exchange between the soil and the atmosphere.     

A comparison of field methods for measuring soil carbon dioxide evolution: Experiments and simulation

Three widely used methods for measuring total soil CO₂ evolution are evaluated, including the dynamic CO₂ absorption method, the static CO₂ absorption method and the closed chamber method. The study covers laboratory experiments. numerical experiments with a simulation model and field measurements. The results are used to perform an error analysis. The aim of this error analysis is to indicate the impact of each method on the CO₂ dynamics during the measurement, and to select the most suitable method for frequent field usage.Laboratory experiments and simulation results show that the dynamic CO₂ absorption method has the potential to absorb all CO₂ evolving at the soil surface. The results also prove that the method has only a minor impact on the CO₂ concentration-depth gradient and the CO₂ efflux. The static CO₂ absorption method underestimates the soil CO₂ evolution, because the absorption velocity is too low, due to slow diffusion processes. Measurements with the closed-chamber method are based on an increasing concentration with time under a closed cover. However, the accumulation of gas alters the concentration gradient in the soil profile and thus causes a rapidly decreasing efflux during the measurement. A commonly used mathematical procedure, which corrects for the altered concentration gradient, does not yield the exact surface efflux, because the effect of increasing storage in the soil profile is not incorporated. Field measurements of CO₂ evolution, using the closed-chamber method and the dynamic CO₂ absorption method confirm the trends that have been predicted by the simulation model. The results of this study indicate that the dynamic CO₂ absorption method is accurate. As it is cheap and simple, it is suitable for the study of temporal and spatial dynamics of CO₂ evolution from the soil.     

Mind the gap: non‐biological processes contributing to soil CO2 efflux

Widespread recognition of the importance of soil CO₂ efflux as a major source of CO₂ to the atmosphere has led to active research. A large soil respiration database and recent reviews have compiled data, methods, and current challenges. This study highlights some deficiencies for a proper understanding of soil CO₂ efflux focusing on processes of soil CO₂ production and transport that have not received enough attention in the current soil respiration literature. It has mostly been assumed that soil CO₂ efflux is the result of biological processes (i.e. soil respiration), but recent studies demonstrate that pedochemical and geological processes, such as geothermal and volcanic CO₂ degassing, are potentially important in some areas. Besides the microbial decomposition of litter, solar radiation is responsible for photodegradation or photochemical degradation of litter. Diffusion is considered to be the main mechanism of CO₂ transport in the soil, but changes in atmospheric pressure and thermal convection may also be important mechanisms driving soil CO₂ efflux greater than diffusion under certain conditions. Lateral fluxes of carbon as dissolved organic and inorganic carbon occur and may cause an underestimation of soil CO₂ efflux. Traditionally soil CO₂ efflux has been measured with accumulation chambers assuming that the main transport mechanism is diffusion. New techniques are available such as improved automated chambers, CO₂ concentration profiles and isotopic techniques that may help to elucidate the sources of carbon from soils. We need to develop specific and standardized methods for different CO₂ sources to quantify this flux on a global scale. Biogeochemical models should include biological and non‐biological CO₂ production processes before we can predict the response of soil CO₂ efflux to climate change. Improving our understanding of the processes involved in soil CO₂ efflux should be a research priority given the importance of this flux in the global carbon budget.     

An evaluation of abiotic carbon sinks in deserts

Recent field studies have reported anomalous CO₂ uptake using eddy‐covariance techniques in arid and semiarid ecosystems. The rates of CO₂ uptake are incompatible with changes in situ of organic carbon pools. Here, I examine several potential mechanisms of abiotic CO₂ uptake in arid and semiarid soils: atmospheric pressure pumping, carbonate dissolution, and percolation of soil water through the vadose zone. Each mechanism is deemed inadequate to explain the observations of the eddy‐covariance systems, which must now be questioned for their accuracy in desert ecosystems.     

Changes in soil greenhouse gas fluxes by land use change from primary forest

Primary forest conversion is a worldwide serious problem associated with human disturbance and climate change. Land use change from primary forest to plantation, grassland or agricultural land may lead to profound alteration in the emission of soil greenhouse gases (GHG). Here, we conducted a global meta‐analysis concerning the effects of primary forest conversion on soil GHG emissions and explored the potential mechanisms from 101 studies. Our results showed that conversion of primary forest significantly decreased soil CO₂ efflux and increased soil CH₄ efflux, but had no effect on soil N₂O efflux. However, the effect of primary forest conversion on soil GHG emissions was not consistent across different types of land use change. For example, soil CO₂ efflux did not respond to the conversion from primary forest to grassland. Soil N₂O efflux showed a prominent increase within the initial stage after conversion of primary forest and then decreased over time while the responses of soil CO₂ and CH₄ effluxes were consistently negative or positive across different elapsed time intervals. Moreover, either within or across all types of primary forest conversion, the response of soil CO₂ efflux was mainly moderated by changes in soil microbial biomass carbon and root biomass while the responses of soil N₂O and CH₄ effluxes were related to the changes in soil nitrate and soil aeration‐related factors (soil water content and bulk density), respectively. Collectively, our findings highlight the significant effects of primary forest conversion on soil GHG emissions, enhance our knowledge on the potential mechanisms driving these effects and improve future models of soil GHG emissions after land use change from primary forest.     

Contrasting soil respiration in young and old-growth ponderosa pine forests

Three years of fully automated and manual measurements of soil CO₂ efflux, soil moisture and temperature were used to explore the diel, seasonal and inter‐annual patterns of soil efflux in an old‐growth (250‐year‐old, O site) and recently regenerating (14‐year‐old, Y site) ponderosa pine forest in central Oregon. The data were used in conjunction with empirical models to determine which variables could be used to predict soil efflux in forests of contrasting ages and disturbance histories. Both stands experienced similar meteorological conditions with moderately cold wet winters and hot dry summers. Soil CO₂ efflux at both sites showed large inter‐annual variability that could be attributed to soil moisture availability in the deeper soil horizons (O site) and the quantity of summer rainfall (Y site). Seasonal patterns of soil CO₂ efflux at the O site showed a strong positive correlation between diel mean soil CO₂ efflux and soil temperature at 64 cm depth whereas diel mean soil efflux at the Y site declined before maximum soil temperature occurred during summer drought. The use of diel mean soil temperature and soil water potential inferred from predawn foliage water potential measurements could account for 80% of the variance of diel mean soil efflux across 3 years at both sites, however, the functional shape of the soil water potential constraint was site‐specific. Based on the similarity of the decomposition rates of litter and fine roots between sites, but greater productivity and amount of fine litter detritus available for decomposition at the O site, we would expect higher rates of soil CO₂ efflux at the O site. However, annual rates were only higher at the O site in one of the 3 years (597 ± 45 vs. 427 ± 80 g C m^?2). Seasonal patterns of soil efflux at both sites showed influences of soil water limitations that were also reflected in patterns of canopy stomatal conductance, suggesting strong linkages between above and below ground processes.     

Inversely Estimating the Vertical Profile of the Soil CO2 Production Rate in a Deciduous Broadleaf Forest Using a Particle Filtering Method

Carbon dioxide (CO₂) efflux from the soil surface, which is a major source of CO₂ from terrestrial ecosystems, represents the total CO₂ production at all soil depths. Although many studies have estimated the vertical profile of the CO₂ production rate, one of the difficulties in estimating the vertical profile is measuring diffusion coefficients of CO₂ at all soil depths in a nondestructive manner. In this study, we estimated the temporal variation in the vertical profile of the CO₂ production rate using a data assimilation method, the particle filtering method, in which the diffusion coefficients of CO₂ were simultaneously estimated. The CO₂ concentrations at several soil depths and CO₂ efflux from the soil surface (only during the snow-free period) were measured at two points in a broadleaf forest in Japan, and the data were assimilated into a simple model including a diffusion equation. We found that there were large variations in the pattern of the vertical profile of the CO₂ production rate between experiment sites: the peak CO₂ production rate was at soil depths around 10 cm during the snow-free period at one site, but the peak was at the soil surface at the other site. Using this method to estimate the CO₂ production rate during snow-cover periods allowed us to estimate CO₂ efflux during that period as well. We estimated that the CO₂ efflux during the snow-cover period (about half the year) accounted for around 13% of the annual CO₂ efflux at this site. Although the method proposed in this study does not ensure the validity of the estimated diffusion coefficients and CO₂ production rates, the method enables us to more closely approach the “actual” values by decreasing the variance of the posterior distribution of the values.     

Soil properties differently influence estimates of soil CO2 efflux from three chamber-based measurement systems

Soil CO₂ efflux is a major component of net ecosystem productivity (NEP) of forest systems. Combining data from multiple researchers for larger-scale modeling and assessment will only be valid if their methodologies provide directly comparable results. We conducted a series of laboratory and field tests to assess the presence and magnitude of soil CO₂ efflux measurement system × environment interactions. Laboratory comparisons were made with a dynamic, steady-state CO₂ flux generation apparatus, wherein gas diffusion drove flux without creating pressure differentials through three artificial soil media of varying air-filled porosity. Under these conditions, two closed systems (Li-6400-09 and SRC-1) exhibited errors that were dependent on physical properties of the artificial media. The open system (ACES) underestimated CO₂ flux. However, unlike the two other systems, the ACES results could be corrected with a single calibration equation that was unaffected by physical differences in artificial media. Both scale and rank changes occurred among the measurement systems across four sites. Our work clearly shows that soil CO₂ efflux measurement system × environment interactions do occur and can substantially impact estimates of soil CO₂ efflux. Until reliable calibration techniques are developed and applied, such interactions make direct comparison of published rates, and C budgets estimated using such rates, difficult.     

Impact of grazing intensity on seasonal variations in soil organic carbon and soil CO2 efflux in two semiarid grasslands in southern Botswana

Biological soil crusts (BSCs) are an important source of organic carbon, and affect a range of ecosystem functions in arid and semiarid environments. Yet the impact of grazing disturbance on crust properties and soil CO₂ efflux remain poorly studied, particularly in African ecosystems. The effects of burial under wind-blown sand, disaggregation and removal of BSCs on seasonal variations in soil CO₂ efflux, soil organic carbon, chlorophyll a and scytonemin were investigated at two sites in the Kalahari of southern Botswana. Field experiments were employed to isolate CO₂ efflux originating from BSCs in order to estimate the C exchange within the crust. Organic carbon was not evenly distributed through the soil profile but concentrated in the BSC. Soil CO₂ efflux was higher in Kalahari Sand than in calcrete soils, but rates varied significantly with seasonal changes in moisture and temperature. BSCs at both sites were a small net sink of C to the soil. Soil CO₂ efflux was significantly higher in sand soils where the BSC was removed, and on calcrete where the BSC was buried under sand. The BSC removal and burial under sand also significantly reduced chlorophyll a, organic carbon and scytonemin. Disaggregation of the soil crust, however, led to increases in chlorophyll a and organic carbon. The data confirm the importance of BSCs for C cycling in drylands and indicate intensive grazing, which destroys BSCs through trampling and burial, will adversely affect C sequestration and storage. Managed grazing, where soil surfaces are only lightly disturbed, would help maintain a positive carbon balance in African drylands.     

Soil pCO2, soil respiration,and root activity in CO2-fumigated and nitrogen-fertilized ponderosa pine

The purpose of this paper is to describe the effects of CO₂ and N treatments on soil pCO₂, calculated CO₂ efflux, root biomass and soil carbon in open-top chambers planted with Pinus ponderosa seedlings. Based upon the literature, it was hypothesized that both elevated CO₂ and N would cause increased root biomass which would in turn cause increases in both total soil CO₂ efflux and microbial respiration. This hypothesis was only supported in part: both CO₂ and N treatments caused significant increases in root biomass, soil pCO₂, and calculated CO₂ efflux, but there were no differences in soil microbial respiration measured in the laboratory. Both correlative and quantitative comparisons of CO₂ efflux rates indicated that microbial respiration contributes little to total soil CO₂ efflux in the field. Measurements of soil pCO₂ and calculated CO₂ efflux provided inexpensive, non-invasive, and relatively sensitive indices of belowground response to CO₂ and N treatments.     

The effects of chamber pressurization on soil-surface CO2 flux and the implications for NEE measurements under elevated CO2

Soil and ecosystem trace gas fluxes are commonly measured using the dynamic chamber technique. Although the chamber pressure anomalies associated with this method are known to be a source of error, their effects have not been fully characterized. In this study, we use results from soil gas-exchange experiments and a soil CO₂ transport model to characterize the effects of chamber pressure on soil CO₂ efflux in an annual California grassland. For greater than ambient chamber pressures, experimental data show that soil-surface CO₂ flux decreases as a nonlinear function of increasing chamber pressure; this decrease is larger for drier soils. In dry soil, a gauge pressure of 0.5 Pa reduced the measured soil CO₂ efflux by roughly 70% relative to the control measurement at ambient pressure. Results from the soil CO₂ transport model show that pressurizing the flux chamber above ambient pressure effectively flushes CO₂ from the soil by generating a downward flow of air through the soil air-filled pore space. This advective flow of air reduces the CO₂ concentration gradient across the soil–atmosphere interface, resulting in a smaller diffusive flux into the chamber head space. Simulations also show that the reduction in diffusive flux is a function of chamber pressure, soil moisture, soil texture, the depth distribution of soil CO₂ generation, and chamber diameter. These results highlight the need for caution in the interpretation of dynamic chamber trace gas flux measurements. A portion of the frequently observed increase in net ecosystem carbon uptake under elevated CO₂ may be an artifact resulting from the impact of chamber pressurization on soil CO₂ efflux.