tRNA regulation of gene expression: interactions of an mRNA 5'-UTR with a regulatory tRNA

Many genes encoding aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and other amino acid-related products in Gram-positive bacteria, including important pathogens, are regulated through interaction of unacylated tRNA with the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) of the mRNA. Each gene regulated by this mechanism responds specifically to the cognate tRNA, and specificity is determined by pairing of the anticodon of the tRNA with a codon sequence in the "Specifier Loop" of the 5'-UTR. For the 5'-UTR to function in gene regulation, the mRNA folding interactions must be sufficiently stable to present the codon sequence for productive binding to the anticodon of the matching tRNA. A model bimolecular system was developed in which the interaction between two half molecules ("Common" and "Specifier") would reconstitute the Specifier Loop region of the 5'-UTR of the Bacillus subtilis glyQS gene, encoding GlyRS mRNA. Gel mobility shift analysis and fluorescence spectroscopy yielded experimental Kds of 27.6 +/- 1.0 microM and 10.5 +/- 0.7 microM, respectively, for complex formation between Common and Specifier half molecules. The reconstituted 5'-UTR of the glyQS mRNA bound the anticodon stem and loop of tRNA(Gly) (ASL(Gly)(GCC)) specifically and with a significant affinity (Kd = 20.2 +/- 1.4 microM). Thus, the bimolecular 5'-UTR and ASL(Gly)(GCC) models mimic the RNA-RNA interaction required for T box gene regulation in vivo.     

Decoding the genome: a modified view

Transfer RNA’s role in decoding the genome is critical to the accuracy and efficiency of protein synthesis. Though modified nucleosides were identified in RNA 50 years ago, only recently has their importance to tRNA’s ability to decode cognate and wobble codons become apparent. RNA modifications are ubiquitous. To date, some 100 different posttranslational modifications have been identified. Modifications of tRNA are the most extensively investigated; however, many other RNAs have modified nucleosides. The modifications that occur at the first, or wobble position, of tRNA’s anticodon and those 3′-adjacent to the anticodon are of particular interest. The tRNAs most affected by individual and combinations of modifications respond to codons in mixed codon boxes where distinction of the third codon base is important for discriminating between the correct cognate or wobble codons and the incorrect near-cognate codons (e.g. AAA/G for lysine versus AAU/C asparagine). In contrast, other modifications expand wobble codon recognition, such as U·U base pairing, for tRNAs that respond to multiple codons of a 4-fold degenerate codon box (e.g. GUU/A/C/G for valine). Whether restricting codon recognition, expanding wobble, enabling translocation, or maintaining the messenger RNA, reading frame modifications appear to reduce anticodon loop dynamics to that accepted by the ribosome. Therefore, we suggest that anticodon stem and loop domain nucleoside modifications allow a limited number of tRNAs to accurately and efficiently decode the 61 amino acid codons by selectively restricting some anticodon–codon interactions and expanding others.     

Motion of transfer RNA from the A/T state into the A‐site using docking and simulations

The ribosome catalyzes peptidyl transfer reactions at the growing nascent polypeptide chain. Here, we present a structural mechanism for selecting cognate over near‐cognate A/T transfer RNA (tRNA). In part, the structural basis for the fidelity of translation relies on accommodation to filter cognate from near‐cognate tRNAs. To examine the assembly of tRNAs within the ribonucleic–riboprotein complex, we conducted a series of all‐atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the entire solvated 70S Escherichia coli ribosome, along with its associated cofactors, proteins, and messenger RNA (mRNA). We measured the motion of the A/T state of tRNA between initial binding and full accommodation. The mechanism of rejection was investigated. Using novel in‐house algorithms, we determined trajectory pathways. Despite the large intersubunit cavity, the available space is limited by the presence of the tRNA, which is equally large. This article describes a “structural gate,” formed between helices 71 and 92 on the ribosomal large subunit, which restricts tRNA motion. The gate and the interacting protein, L14, of the 50S ribosome act as steric filters in two consecutive substeps during accommodation, each requiring: (1) sufficient energy contained in the hybrid tRNA kink and (2) sufficient energy in the Watson–Crick base pairing of the codon–anticodon. We show that these barriers act to filter out near‐cognate tRNA and promote proofreading of the codon–anticodon. Since proofreading is essential for understanding the fidelity of translation, our model for the dynamics of this process has substantial biomedical implications. Proteins 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Identifying the ligated amino acid of archaeal tRNAs based on positions outside the anticodon

Proper recognition of tRNAs by their aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is essential for translation accuracy. Following evidence that the enzymes can recognize the correct tRNA even when anticodon information is masked, we search for additional nucleotide positions within the tRNA molecule that potentially contain information for amino acid identification. Analyzing 3936 sequences of tRNA genes from 86 archaeal species, we show that the tRNAs’ cognate amino acids can be identified by the information embedded in the tRNAs’ nucleotide positions without relying on the anticodon information. We present a small set of six to 10 informative positions along the tRNA, which allow for amino acid identification accuracy of 90.6% to 97.4%, respectively. We inspected tRNAs for each of the 20 amino acid types for such informative positions and found that tRNA genes for some amino acids are distinguishable from others by as few as one or two positions. The informative nucleotide positions are in agreement with nucleotide positions that were experimentally shown to affect the loaded amino acid identity. Interestingly, the knowledge gained from the tRNA genes of one archaeal phylum does not extrapolate well to another phylum. Furthermore, each species has a unique ensemble of nucleotides in the informative tRNA positions, and the similarity between the sets of positions of two distinct species reflects their evolutionary distance. Hence, we term this set of informative positions a “tRNA cipher.” It is tempting to suggest that the diverging code identified here might also serve the aminoacyl tRNA synthetase in the task of tRNA recognition.     

The difference in the type of codon-anticodon base pairing at the ribosomal P-site is one of the determinants of the translational rate

By utilizing an enzymatically reconstructed tRNA variant containing an altered anticodon sequence, we have examined the different biochemical behavior of translation between the Watson-Crick type and the wobble type base pair interactions at the first anticodon position. We have found that the Watson-Crick type base pair has an advantage in translation in contrast to the wobble type base pair by comparing the efficiency of transpeptidation of native tRNA(Phe) (anticodon; GmAA) with its variant tRNA (anticodon; AAA) in the poly(U)-programmed ribosome system. Thomas et al. [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S. (1988) 85, 4242-4246] showed that the wobble codon at the ribosomal A-site accepted its cognate tRNA less efficiently than the Watson-Crick base pairing codon. We report here that the wobble interaction at the ribosomal P-site also affected the rate of translation. This variable translational rate may be a mechanism of gene regulation through preferential codon usage.     

tRNA anticodon shifts in eukaryotic genomes

Embedded in the sequence of each transfer RNA are elements that promote specific interactions with its cognate aminoacyl tRNA-synthetase. Although many such “identity elements” are known, their detection is difficult since they rely on unique structural signatures and the combinatorial action of multiple elements spread throughout the tRNA molecule. Since the anticodon is often a major identity determinant itself, it is possible to switch between certain tRNA functional types by means of anticodon substitutions. This has been shown to have occurred during the evolution of some genomes; however, the scale and relevance of “anticodon shifts” to the evolution of the tRNA multigene family is unclear. Using a synteny-conservation–based method, we detected tRNA anticodon shifts in groups of closely related species: five primates, 12 Drosophila, six nematodes, 11 Saccharomycetes, and 61 Enterobacteriaceae. We found a total of 75 anticodon shifts: 31 involving switches of identity (alloacceptor shifts) and 44 between isoacceptors that code for the same amino acid (isoacceptor shifts). The relative numbers of shifts in each taxa suggest that tRNA gene redundancy is likely the driving factor, with greater constraint on changes of identity. Sites that frequently covary with alloacceptor shifts are located at the extreme ends of the molecule, in common with most known identity determinants. Isoacceptor shifts are associated with changes in the midsections of the tRNA sequence. However, the mutation patterns of anticodon shifts involving the same identities are often dissimilar, suggesting that alternate sets of mutation may achieve the same functional compensation.