A paradox and three egnimas about the role of BRCA1 in breast and ovarian cancers

More than 50% of the hereditary forms are associated with germ line mutation in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes (BReast CAncer 1/2). The BRCA1 protein is expressed ubiquitously and is likely to play a role in several fundamental processes, including the maintenance of genomic integrity. Paradoxically, BRCA1 appears as a gene essential for proliferation of embryonic cells that simultaneously carries tumor suppressor activity. The nature of the role of BRCA1 in DNA repair and maintenance of genome integrity remains enigmatic. BRCA1 may indeed be a sensor of "abnormal" DNA structures that undergo heterochromatinisation. This model finds some support in the recent report that BRCA1 participates in the maintenance of X-chromosome inactivation, a paradigm for facultative heterochromatinisation. Why are epithelial cells from mammary glands and ovaries the privileged targets for tumorigenesis in women carrying germline mutations in BRCA1? The inheritance of a single defective copy of BRCA1 by women confers a status of susceptibility for developing breast and/or ovarian cancer. The loss of the wild-type allele inherited from the unaffected parent (LOH), commonly observed in the primary breast and ovarian tumors in these susceptible women, represents the event that initiates the tumorigenesis process. This classical two hit model, which assumes that heterozygote cells are "normal" until the LOH occurs stochastically, remains enigmatic.     

BRCA1和BRCA2与DNA损伤修复及转录调控

乳腺癌和卵巢癌敏感基因BRCA1和BRCA2与同源重组,DNA损伤修复,胚胎生长,转录调控及遍在蛋白化有关,其中,BRCA1和BRCA2在DNA损伤修复和转录调控中功能的确定,将有助于探讨和阐明两者的肿瘤抑制功能及其机理,作者将综述近年来有关BRCA1和BRCA2在DNA损伤修复和转录调控中功能研究的最新进展。     

Genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2: A literature review

Women with mutations in the breast cancer genes BRCA1 or BRCA2 have an increased lifetime risk of developing breast, ovarian and other BRCA-associated cancers. However, the number of detected germline mutations in families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome is lower than expected based upon genetic linkage data. Undetected deleterious mutations in the BRCA genes in some high-risk families are due to the presence of intragenic rearrangements such as deletions, duplications or insertions that span whole exons. This article reviews the molecular aspects of BRCA1 and BRCA2 rearrangements and their frequency among different populations. An overview of the techniques used to screen for large rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 is also presented. The detection of rearrangements in BRCA genes, especially BRCA1, offers a promising outlook for mutation screening in clinical practice, particularly in HBOC families that test negative for a germline mutation assessed by traditional methods.     

Loss of nuclear BRCA1 protein staining in normal tissue cells derived from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Enhanced genomic instability has been recently reported in normal cells derived from BRCA1/2 mutation carriers when placed in vitro in non-physiological stress conditions. We present here original data which help to explain the observed genomic instability. Leucocytes from BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, sporadic breast cancer patients and controls were prepared for BRCA1 immunocytochemistry. We show that BRCA1 containing nuclear dot like structures are detectable in about 80% of the leucocytes from controls and sporadic breast cancer patients, but are absent in the majority of normal cells from BRCA1 as well as BRCA2 mutation carriers (also in their normal breast cells). Our results thus indicate that the genomic instability observed in normal cells from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers is associated with a down-regulation of nuclear BRCA1 protein accumulation in the dot like structures. These results suggest in addition that immunocytochemical or alternative molecular screening strategies might help to identify women with a high risk for breast (ovarian) cancer even when the underlying genetic defect remains undetectable.     

Mouse embryonic stem cell-based functional assay to evaluate mutations in BRCA2

Individuals with mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 have up to an 80% risk of developing breast cancer by the age of 70. Sequencing-based genetic tests are now available to identify mutation carriers in an effort to reduce mortality through prevention and early diagnosis. However, lack of a suitable functional assay hinders the risk assessment of more than 1,900 BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants in the Breast Cancer Information Core database that do not clearly disrupt the gene product. We have established a simple, versatile and reliable assay to test for the functional significance of mutations in BRCA2 using mouse embryonic stem cells (ES cells) and bacterial artificial chromosomes and have used it to classify 17 sequence variants. The assay is based on the ability of human BRCA2 to complement the loss of endogenous Brca2 in mouse ES cells. This technique may also serve as a paradigm for functional analysis of mutations found in other genes linked to human diseases.     

Management updates for women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation

In most cases of families with breast and ovarian cancer, the pattern of cancers in the family can be attributed to mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Genetic testing for these cancer susceptibility genes typically takes place in the context of comprehensive genetic counseling. Strategies have been developed for the medical management of women at high risk of developing breast cancer, including options for screening and prophylactic surgery. BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers are recommended to undergo prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy by age 35-40 years or when childbearing is complete. This surgery significantly reduces the risk of ovarian cancer and also reduces the risk of breast cancer when performed in premenopausal mutation carriers. For breast cancer management, BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers are offered the options of increased surveillance, with or without chemoprevention, or prophylactic surgery. Currently, BRCA carrier status is not used as an independent prognostic factor regarding systemic treatment options.     

Genetic heterogeneity in hereditary breast cancer: role of BRCA1 and BRCA2.

The common hereditary forms of breast cancer have been largely attributed to the inheritance of mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. However, it is not yet clear what proportion of hereditary breast cancer is explained by BRCA1 and BRCA2 or by some other unidentified susceptibility gene(s). We describe the proportion of hereditary breast cancer explained by BRCA1 or BRCA2 in a sample of North American hereditary breast cancers and assess the evidence for additional susceptibility genes that may confer hereditary breast or ovarian cancer risk. Twenty-three families were identified through two high-risk breast cancer research programs. Genetic analysis was undertaken to establish linkage between the breast or ovarian cancer cases and markers on chromosomes 17q (BRCA1) and 13q (BRCA2). Mutation analysis in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes was also undertaken in all families. The pattern of hereditary cancer in 14 (61%) of the 23 families studied was attributed to BRCA1 by a combination of linkage and mutation analyses. No families were attributed to BRCA2. Five families (22%) provided evidence against linkage to both BRCA1 and BRCA2. No BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were detected in these five families. The BRCA1 or BRCA2 status of four families (17%) could not be determined. BRCA1 and BRCA2 probably explain the majority of hereditary breast cancer that exists in the North American population. However, one or more additional genes may yet be found that explain some proportion of hereditary breast cancer.     

乳腺癌易感基因BRCA1研究进展

BRCA1是目前所发现的最重要的乳腺癌易感基因之一,它在DNA损伤修复,细胞周期调节,基因的转录激活,染色质稳定性,细胞增殖等方面都起着重要作用。该文着重介绍近几年来BRCA1基础研究方面的进展,并讨论BRCA1在肿瘤发生、发展过程的作用。为BRCA1在临床上的应用提供理论依据。     

Moderate frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations in Scandinavian familial breast cancer.

Previous studies of high-risk breast cancer families have proposed that two major breast cancer-susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, may account for at least two-thirds of all hereditary breast cancer. We have screened index cases from 106 Scandinavian (mainly southern Swedish) breast cancer and breast-ovarian cancer families for germ-line mutations in all coding exons of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, using the protein-truncation test, SSCP analysis, or direct sequencing. A total of 24 families exhibited 11 different BRCA1 mutations, whereas 11 different BRCA2 mutations were detected in 12 families, of which 3 contained cases of male breast cancer. One BRCA2 mutation, 4486delG, was found in two families of the present study and, in a separate study, also in breast tumors from three unrelated males with unknown family history, suggesting that at least one BRCA2 founder mutation exists in the Scandinavian population. We report 1 novel BRCA1 mutation, eight additional cases of 4 BRCA1 mutations described elsewhere, and 11 novel BRCA2 mutations (9 frameshift deletions and 2 nonsense mutations), of which all are predicted to cause premature truncation of the translated products. The relatively low frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in the present study could be explained by insufficient screening sensitivity to the location of mutations in uncharacterized regulatory regions, the analysis of phenocopies, or, most likely, within predisposed families, additional uncharacterized BRCA genes.     

BRCA1 epigenetic inactivation predicts sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy in breast and ovarian cancer

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes are associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer development. Both genes are involved in DNA repair, and tumors harboring genetic defects in them are thought to be more sensitive to DNA-damaging agents used in chemotherapy. However, as only a minority of breast and ovarian cancer patients carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, few patients are likely to benefit from these pharmacogenetic biomarkers. Herein, we show that, in cancer cell lines and xenografted tumors, BRCA1 CpG island promoter hypermethylation-associated silencing also predicts enhanced sensitivity to platinum-derived drugs to the same extent as BRCA1 mutations. Most importantly, BRCA1 hypermethylation proves to be a predictor of longer time to relapse and improved overall survival in ovarian cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin.     

BRCA1 epigenetic inactivation predicts sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy in breast and ovarian cancer

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes are associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer development. Both genes are involved in DNA repair, and tumors harboring genetic defects in them are thought to be more sensitive to DNA-damaging agents used in chemotherapy. However, as only a minority of breast and ovarian cancer patients carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, few patients are likely to benefit from these pharmacogenetic biomarkers. Herein, we show that, in cancer cell lines and xenografted tumors, BRCA1 CpG island promoter hypermethylation-associated silencing also predicts enhanced sensitivity to platinum-derived drugs to the same extent as BRCA1 mutations. Most importantly, BRCA1 hypermethylation proves to be a predictor of longer time to relapse and improved overall survival in ovarian cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin.     

Down-regulation of BRCA2 expression by collagen type I promotes prostate cancer cell proliferation

BRCA2 is a tumor suppressor gene that when mutated confers an increased susceptibility to developing breast and prostate carcinoma. Besides its role in mediating DNA repair, new evidence suggests that BRCA2 may also play a role in suppressing cancer cell growth. Because altered interactions between neoplastic cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) play a pivotal role in unchecked cancer cell proliferation and metastatic progression, we hypothesized that the ECM may have an effect in BRCA2 expression. By using normal and prostate carcinoma cell lines, we demonstrated that although normal cells transiently increase BRCA2 protein levels when adhering to the ECM protein collagen type I (COL1), carcinoma cells exhibit a significant reduction in BRCA2 protein. This aberrant effect is independent from de novo protein synthesis and results from COL1-beta(1) integrin signaling through phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase leading to BRCA2 ubiquitination and degradation in the proteasome. BRCA2 protein depletion after cancer cell adhesion to COL1 or in small RNA interference assays triggers new DNA synthesis, a trophic effect that is abrogated by recombinant BRCA2 expression. Blocking or inhibiting beta(1) integrin, PI 3-kinase, or proteasome activity all have a negative effect on COL1-mediated DNA synthesis in cancer cells. In normal cells, the transient increase in BRCA2 expression is independent from beta(1) integrin or PI 3-kinase and has no effect in cell proliferation. In summary, these results unravel a novel mechanism whereby prostate carcinoma cell proliferation is enhanced by the down-regulation of BRCA2 expression when interacting with COL1, a major component of the ECM at osseous metastatic sites.     

Mouse models for BRCA1 associated tumorigenesis: From fundamental insights to preclinical utility

Germline mutations in BRCA1 result in a significant predisposition for breast and ovarian cancer, with frequent LOH of the remaining wild type allele. Soon after the identification of BRCA1, several different knockout mice were generated to study its biological function in vivo. BRCA1, which is involved in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair, appeared to be essential for embryonic proliferation and survival during mid-gestation. In contrast to human mutation carriers however, heterozygous mouse mutants did not show spontaneous cancer development. Therefore, a number of conditional mouse models were developed. While tumors of these mice show varying degrees of similarity with their human counterparts, two mouse models develop mammary tumors that lack expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors and ERBB2. This ‘triple negative’ signature is a characteristic feature of BRCA1-associated breast cancers, which can therefore not be treated with endocrine agents or ERBB2-targeting therapeutics. Promising drugs for treating BRCA1-mutated tumors include platinum compounds and PARP inhibitors, which are specifically toxic to DSB repair deficient cells. Although encouraging results have been reported, recent findings indicate that BRCA1/2 deficient ovarian tumors can escape from such targeted treatment by genetic reversion. This resistance mechanism might be studied in future mouse tumor models based on Brca1 truncating mutations mimicking defined human founder mutations.     

Hereditary breast cancer; Genetic penetrance and current status with BRCA

The most important cause of developing hereditary breast cancer is germline mutations occurring in breast cancer (BCs) susceptibility genes, for example, BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, CHEK2, PTEN, ATM, and PPM1D. Many BC susceptibility genes can be grouped into two classes, high- and low-penetrance genes, each of which interact with multiple genes and environmental factors. However, the penetrance of genes can also be represented by a spectrum, which ranges between high and low. Two of the most common susceptibility genes are BRCA1 and BRCA2, which perform vital cellular functions for repair of homologous DNA. Loss of heterozygosity accompanied by hereditary mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 increases chromosomal instability and the likelihood of cancer, as well as playing a key role in stimulating malignant transformation. With regard to pathological features, familial breast cancers caused by BRCA1 mutations usually differ from those caused by BRCA2 mutations and nonfamilial BCs. It is essential to acquire an understanding of these pathological features along with the genetic history of the patient to offer an individualized treatment. Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the main genetic and inherited factors for breast and ovarian cancer. In fact, these mutations are very important in developing early onset and increasing the risk of familial breast and ovarian cancer and responsible for 90% of hereditary BC cases. Therefore, according to the conducted studies, screening of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is recommended as an important marker for early detection of all patients with breast or ovarian cancer risk with family history of the disease. In this review, we summarize the role of hereditary genes, mainly BRCA1 and BRCA2, in BC.     

Functional assays for BRCA1 and BRCA2

Genetic testing for the two major breast cancer susceptibility genes has now been available for several years with more than 70,000 people tested in the USA alone. While the current genetic testing identifies many sequence alterations there are problems with both sensitivity and specificity of the assay. In particular, the genetic testing is limited in its ability to determine which of the many missense mutations identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2 actually predispose to cancer and which are simply neutral alterations. Here we will focus on the limitations in test result interpretation and we will explore how biochemistry and cell biology can help to clarify these issues. Although we limit our discussion to genetic testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2, the problem is common to an expanding group of genes, including ATM and MSH2, in which germ-line missense mutations may also confer increased risk of cancer. Here we advocate the use of functional assays to complement genetic data in the analysis of unclassified missense mutations and propose a set of standards to conduct and interpret these assays.     

First BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene testing implemented in the health care system of Stockholm

The aim of the study was to optimize the criteria for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene testing and to improve oncogenetic counseling in the Stockholm region. Screening for inherited breast cancer genes is laborious and a majority of tested samples turn out to be negative. The frequencies of mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes differ across populations. Between 1997 and 2000, 160 families with breast and/or ovarian cancer were counseled and screened for mutations in the two genes. Twenty-five BRCA1 and two BRCA2 disease-causing mutations were found. Various factors associated with the probability of finding a BRCA1 mutation in the families were estimated. Age of onset in different generations and other malignancies were also studied. Families from our region in which both breast and ovarian cancer occur were likely to carry a BRCA1 mutation (34%). In breast-only cancer families, mutations were found only in those with very early onset. All breast- only cancer families with a mutation had at least one case of onset before 36 years of age and a young median age of onset (<43 years). Other malignancies than breast and ovarian cancers did not segregate in the BRCA1 families and surveillance for other malignancies is not needed, in general. Decreasing age of onset with successive generations was common and must be taken into account when surveillance options are considered.     

Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 have recently been identified on the human genome. Women who carry a mutation of one of these genes have a greatly increased chance of developing breast and ovarian cancer, and they usually develop the disease at a much younger age, compared with normal individuals. Women can be tested to see whether they are carriers. A woman who undergoes genetic counseling before testing can be told the probabilities that she is a carrier, given her family history. In this paper we develop a model for evaluating the probabilities that a woman is a carrier of a mutation of BRCA1 and BRCA2, on the basis of her family history of breast and ovarian cancer in first- and second-degree relatives. Of special importance are the relationships of the family members with cancer, the ages at onset of the diseases, and the ages of family members who do not have the diseases. This information can be elicited during genetic counseling and prior to genetic testing. The carrier probabilities are obtained from Bayes's rule, by use of family history as the evidence and by use of the mutation prevalences as the prior distribution. In addressing an individual's carrier probabilities, we incorporate uncertainty about some of the key inputs of the model, such as the age-specific incidence of diseases and the overall prevalence of mutations. There is some evidence that other, undiscovered genes may be important in explaining familial breast cancer. Users of the current version of the model should be aware of this limitation. The methodology that we describe can be extended to more than two genes, should data become available about other genes.