Effects of 11-month interventions on oral cleanliness among the long-term hospitalised elderly

Objectives: This trial studied the effects of interventions on the oral cleanliness of the long‐term hospitalised elderly. Background: Oral cleanliness is mostly poor in long‐term facilities. While many agree on the importance of oral hygiene education for nursing personnel, little information and agreement exists on how to organise this education in geriatric institutions. Materials and methods: This is a longitudinal study with interventions. After a baseline clinical examination, the patient wards were divided into three groups (A, B and C) and the type of intervention was randomly assigned. In group A, dental hygienists provided oral hygiene measures for the subjects once every 3 weeks. In group B, the nursing staff first received hands‐on instructions after which they assumed responsibility for the subjects’ daily oral hygiene. Group C served as a control. Denture hygiene and dental hygiene were recorded at baseline and in the end of the 11‐month study period. In total, 130 subjects completed the interventions; their mean age was 82.9 years. Results: The best outcome in both denture and dental hygiene occurred when nursing staff at the wards took care of hygiene (group B). The increase in the proportion of those with good denture hygiene was the most prominent in group B (from 11% to 56%). The proportion of subjects with poor overall dental hygiene decreased from 61% at baseline to 57% in the end, for group B from 80% to 48%. Conclusions: Organised oral health education of the nursing staff should receive more attention.     

Aged care staff perspectives on oral care for residents: Western Australia

Objective: To determine manager and staff perceptions of oral health and dental service issues for residents in aged care facilities in the Perth Metropolitan Area, Western Australia. Design: Focus groups and face‐to‐face semi‐structured interviews with aged care facility managers and staff. Setting and subjects: Personnel at 12 facilities (high‐level and low‐level care) located in the Perth Metropolitan Area participated in the study. Interviews were conducted with 14 facility managers. Focus groups and face‐to‐face interviews were conducted with 40 facility staff. Results: Managers and staff had similar views regarding most issues. While resident oral health was considered important, regular oral care programmes were limited or lacking. In general, high care facility residents did not have regular dental checkups, while those in low‐level care facilities usually visited their own dentist for checkups or treatment. Barriers to maintaining regular oral care included: resident non‐compliance; financial concerns; lack of co‐operation from family; mobility issues; and lack of interest from dental professionals. Suggested improvements to current services included regular on‐site visits, staff education and specialised dental professionals. Conclusion: Residents face many barriers to maintenance of adequate oral health care, particularly those who are functionally dependent and cognitively impaired. There is an urgent need for appropriate oral care programmes for aged care residents, which include dentists with aged care experience and continuing education for facility staff. Any major programmes should be evaluated carefully.     

Provision of dental care in aged care facilities,NSW, Australia – Part 1 as perceived by the Directors of Nursing (care providers)

doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2012.00670.x Provision of dental care in aged care facilities, NSW, Australia – Part 1 as perceived by the Directors of Nursing (care providers) Objective: To ascertain the Directors of Nursing (DONs) perception of the provision of dental care and the difficulties in oral health maintenance for residents in New South Wales (NSW) aged care facilities (ACFs). Background: There were no specific figures relating to DONs’ perceptions of oral health needs and dental care nor obstructions to dental care of residents. Materials and methods: A total of 414 questionnaires, encoded for confidentiality, were posted to all DONs of ACFs in NSW and the data analysed. Results: Questionnaires were returned from 255 ACFs (response rate 61.6%) representing 16 861 residents with a male‐to‐female ratio of 1:3.45. Of these residents, 48% had a dental assessment on admission by qualified dental staff. In 74.2% of facilities, no regular visits by dental staff took place, and 58.6% considered the perceived unwillingness of dental professionals to visit residents a barrier to good oral health. DONs reported that 53.6% of residents had dentures only, while 18.3% had natural teeth only. The most frequent difficulties reported by staff were residents’ use of abusive language (78.2%) and residents refusing to open mouth (60.9%). Conclusion: Lack of involvement of dental professionals in admission assessment and in ongoing programmes was of concern to DONs in ACFs.     

Oral health care in long‐term care facilities for elderly people in southern Brazil: a conceptual framework

doi:10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2009.00280.x
Oral health care in long‐term care facilities for elderly people in southern Brazil: a conceptual framework Objective: To present a theoretical model for understanding oral health care for the elderly in the context of long‐term care institutions (LTCI). Methods: Open‐ended individual interviews were conducted with the elderly residing in LTCI, their carers, nursing technicians and nurses, directors of care, dental surgeons and managers of public health services. A grounded theory methodological approach was adopted for data collection and analysis. Results: The emerging core category revealed a basic social process: ‘Promoting oral health care for the elderly based on the context of LTCI’. This process was composed of two contradicting yet correlated aspects: the oral health care does not minimise the poor oral epidemiological condition, and at the same time, there was a continued improvement in the oral care expressed by better care practices. These aspects were related to the: attribution of meaning to oral health, social determination of oral health, the ageing process, interactions established in the oral health care practices, oral health care management in LTCI, inclusion of oral health care into the political–organisational dimension and possibility of conjecturing better oral health care practices. Conclusion: The core concept of ‘Promotion of oral health care for elderly people based on the context of LTCI’ is capable of explaining the variations in the structure and process of LTCI, as well as in helping to understand the meaning of the oral health care practices for the institutionalised elderly.     

Oral health care issues in aged care facilities in Western Australia: resident and family caregiver views

Objective: To investigate resident and family perceptions and attitudes towards oral health care and access to dental services for aged care facility residents. Method: Focus groups and individual interviews with residents and family caregivers were conducted at aged care facilities in the Perth Metropolitan Area, Western Australia. Results: There were 30 participants from twelve aged care facilities (21 residents and nine family caregivers). Five focus groups comprising both residents and family caregivers were conducted in addition to three face‐to‐face interviews with residents. Both groups considered oral health very important to overall health and quality of life. Family caregivers noted a lack of dental check‐ups and specialised professional oral care, particularly in high‐care facilities. Low care residents were more likely to have regular dental check‐ups or dental treatment and off‐site dental visits were straightforward due to their mobility and family member assistance. Family caregivers noted time limitations and lack of expertise in oral health care amongst staff in high‐care facilities, and the challenges of maintaining oral care for residents with poor mobility or cognitive impairment. It was considered important that staff and management liaise with family caregivers and family members in provision of oral care. Conclusion: Regular oral care, assessment and treatment were considered limited, particularly for residents in high care. There is a need for comprehensive, ongoing oral health programmes involving appropriately trained and empathetic dental health professionals and staff to improve oral health care in Perth’s aged care facilities.     

Oral health‐related quality of life in patients receiving home‐care nursing: associations with aspects of dental status and xerostomia

doi:10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2009.00344.x
Oral health‐related quality of life in patients receiving home‐care nursing: associations with aspects of dental status and xerostomia Objective: To explore the differences in oral status, dental attendance and dry mouth problems between patients with long‐term disease with high and low scores on Oral Health Impact Profile 14 (OHIP 14) and how patients cope with oral problems such as xerostomia and a reduced ability to brush their teeth. Background: There has been a lack of studies of oral health and oral health‐related quality of life in the frail elderly within the community services. Materials and methods: A cross‐sectional questionnaire study was conducted with 137 patients receiving home‐care nursing. Structured interviews were conducted by student nurses using OHIP‐14, items from the Xerostomia Inventory and questions concerning dental visit habits, brushing of teeth and data from medical records. Results: Eighty‐three per cent of patients had natural teeth and 60% had only natural teeth. ‘Natural teeth only’ indicated a low score on OHIP‐14. Problems with brushing and items concerning xerostomia indicated a high score on OHIP‐14. Contrasts in the assessments concerning brushing of teeth and xerostomia indicated low priority from the patients themselves and the nursing staff. Conclusion: Community health services should focus upon oral health. Both patients and nurses should assess the need for regular brushing of teeth carried out by home‐care nurses. Assessment and treatment of dry mouth problems should have higher priority.     

Behind the screens: care staff observations on delivery of oral health care in nursing homes

Objective: To identify qualitatively carer staff attitudes, practices and clinical comments related to oral health care of functionally dependent nursing home clients. Design: Open-ended questions included in a longer quantitative questionnaire. Setting: 22 randomly selected nursing homes in the Bristol area. Subjects: 416 carers employed in these homes. Results: The majority of carers thought that clients had a right to good oral health, accepted the carers' role in helping clients with oral and denture hygiene, but recognised that oral health care provision was deficient. However, some carers believed oral health care to be solely the clients' responsibility despite high disability levels. Main barriers to providing oral health care were low prioritisation of oral health by nursing management, lack of co-operation from cognitively impaired clients, and lack of training. Carers were critical of homes' lack of arrangements for routine professional dental cheeks, lack of commitment to staff training, low standards of oral health care by colleagues, and lack of provision of oral hygiene aids and cleansing materials for clients. Many responses indicated ways in which nursing home oral health care could be improved. Carers reported contrasting experiences of dental treatment, and deplored recent decreased availability of subsidised dental care. Conclusions: Carers' generally positive attitudes towards clients' oral health care should encourage health educators. Insights gained from qualitative data can help to identify the less obvious causes for poor oral care delivery, which can then be addressed in education and training initiatives in nursing home settings.     

The effect of awareness on the outcome of oral health performed by home care service providers

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlations amongst factors, such as knowledge, attitude, practice and oral health behaviour, in caregiver managers so as to improve the oral health of the dependent elderly. Methods: Data were collected from a sample of 102 caregiver managers from home care service providers using a questionnaire. The respondents were divided into two groups: the group who were aware of effective oral care (A group) and the group who were unaware of effective oral care (U group). The evaluations were frequency distribution tables followed by chi‐squared tests of independence and Fisher’s exact test. Results: Ninety percent of the respondents thought that dependent elderly needed to be provided with oral care and 77% had been trained in oral care. However, only 44% thought that they could provide appropriate oral care and only 52% had experienced its effect on oral health and general health. There was a significant difference in training by dental hygienists between the A group (36%) and the U group (11%). There was also a significant difference in learning of oral care skills. Conclusion: The results suggested a high oral care awareness amongst caregiver managers and an inadequate oral care training system. To improve oral health of the dependent elderly, theoretical teaching alone is not sufficient when providing oral health education and a positive contact with the dental team, especially dental hygienists, is an important factor which supports oral care provided by caregivers.     

A study on the effects of short-, medium- and long-term professional oral care in elderly persons requiring long-term nursing care at a chronic or maintenance stage of illness

Objective: The purpose of the present study is to clarify the frequency of provision of effective professional oral care by dental health workers in order to improve the oral hygiene state of elderly persons requiring long‐term care. Methods: In 105 patients requiring long‐term nursing care, 55 subjects with positive oral Candida albicans were divided into five groups according to the frequency of oral care intervention at intervals of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 weeks. The effects of professional oral care on the improvement of the oral hygiene state were investigated taking the frequency and duration of care into consideration. Results: The results showed that oral hygienic condition could be improved by performing professional oral care at intervals of 1 week for 12 consecutive weeks, and the improved condition could be maintained when professional oral care was continued at intervals of 1 week thereafter. Conclusion: It is necessary to continue professional oral care at intervals of 1 week for 12 consecutive weeks and at intervals of 2 weeks for more than 20 weeks. The oral hygiene state could be improved by professional intervention at intervals of three or four weeks in long‐term oral care, but this was limited to subjects whose Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores were higher than 3.     

Oral hygiene of elderly people in long-term care institutions--a cross-sectional study

Objective: The aim of this cross‐sectional study was to assess the level of oral hygiene in elderly people living in long‐term care institutions and to investigate the relationship between institutional and individual characteristics, and the observed oral cleanliness. Materials and methods: Clinical outcome variables, denture plaque and dental plaque were gathered from 359 older people (14%) living in 19 nursing homes. Additional data were collected by a questionnaire filled out by all health care workers employed in the nursing homes. Results: Only 128 (36%) residents had teeth present in one or both dental arches. About half of the residents (47%) wore complete dentures. The mean dental plaque score was 2.17 (maximum possible score = 3) and the mean denture plaque score was 2.13 (maximum possible score = 4). Significantly more plaque was observed on the mucosal surface of the denture with a mean plaque score of 2.33 vs. 1.93 on the buccal surface (p < 0.001). In the multiple analyses only the degree of dependency on an individual level was found to be significantly correlated with the outcome dental plaque (odds ratio: 3.09) and only the management of the institution with denture plaque (odds ratio: 0.43). Conclusion: Oral hygiene was poor, both for dentures and remaining teeth in residents in long‐term care institutions and only the degree of dependency of the residents and the management of the institutions was associated with the presence of dental plaque and denture plaque respectively.     

Oral care training in the basic education of care professionals

doi:10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2009.00304.x
Oral care training in the basic education of care professionals Objective: To investigate the quantity and quality of oral care training in the basic education of future long‐term care (LTC) professionals in Norway. Background: The level of oral hygiene has often proved inadequate in LTC facilities. It has been maintained that this could be due to insufficient knowledge of oral care among care professionals. Materials and methods: A self‐administered questionnaire was sent to all 270 schools in Norway which offered basic education of LTC personnel in 2004/05. Information on theoretical and practical oral care training, scope of oral care in teaching material and curriculum, educational background of the teaching staff and schools opinion regarding adequacy of their training programme was collected. Results: Of the 203 respondents (75% response rate), 188 (participants) included oral care in their educational programme. Approximately two‐thirds of the participating schools provided 3 h or more of oral care training and many of the important themes were presented in the textbooks that were recommended. Moreover, the practical exercises performed in practice placement supplemented the knowledge. Conclusion: The results could not confirm that LTC professional’s basic education concerning oral care was inadequate. There may therefore be other explanations for the poor oral hygiene in many LTC facilities.     

The dental awareness of nursing home staff in Singapore - a pilot study

Objective: The aim of this pilot study was to assess the oral health knowledge among staff working in a local nursing home managed by a voluntary welfare organisation. Method: A self‐administered questionnaire was completed by 53 nursing staff working in a home with 270 residents. The questionnaire was structured to assess the staff's knowledge of dental caries, periodontal disease and the care and use of dentures. Results: 99.6% of the respondents felt that oral health care of the elderly was very important. However, only 45.3% of them attributed the cause of dental caries to the frequent intake of sugar. Bacteria in dental plaque was identified by 88.7% of them as the main cause of periodontal disease while 96.2% of them indicated that dentures should be cleaned at least once a day and rinsed after every meal. Conclusion: The staff of this nursing home demonstrated positive knowledge of periodontal disease and denture care. However, their knowledge of dental caries revealed substantial room for improvement. This could signal an area for future staff training and development. Such efforts would help establish a team of caregivers who can improve the oral health and quality of life for residents in the nursing home.     

Attitudes to and knowledge about oral health care among nursing home personnel--an area in need of improvement

doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2011.00562.x
Attitudes to and knowledge about oral health care among nursing home personnel – an area in need of improvement Background: In 1999, a dental reform became law in Sweden that regulated both dental care to dependent individuals and training in oral health care for nursing home personnel. Substantial resources have been channelled into these efforts, but the outcome of these efforts has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to explore attitudes to and knowledge about oral health care among nursing home personnel more than 5 years after the law was adopted, that being 2005. Methods: A total of 454 individuals employed at nursing homes answered a questionnaire of 16 multiple‐choice items concerning attitudes to and knowledge about oral health care. Results: Eighty‐nine per cent considered oral health care to be an important part of good nursing. The answers indicated problems, however, when it came to its implementation and knowledge, and 35% stated that they had had no formal education in oral health care. Conclusions: Despite generally positive oral health care attitudes, it is important that oral health care education is available to and made of interest for all nursing home personnel, especially in light of the increase in number of natural teeth and frequency of crowns and bridges among dependent elderly.     

Oral health and dental care facilities in Maltese residential homes

Objectives: To establish oral health care practices, including the use of dental services, in the residential homes of Malta and Gozo by assessing the knowledge of home managers and assistance of care staff regarding residents’ oral health and hygiene; and evaluating the residents’ demand for dental treatment and residential home managers response to this demand. Subjects: A total population sample of licensed residential homes (38) in Malta and Gozo was used comprising all home managers in government (seven), church (20), and privately run (11) residential homes. Method: A 19‐question questionnaire was designed, piloted and sent to the home managers requesting them to report on the dental care provision for their elderly residents. The questionnaire was distributed by post, along with a reply‐paid envelope and an explanatory letter. A response deadline of 1 month was included. Results: An 87% response rate was achieved. Whilst the majority of home managers (64%) were aware of domiciliary dental services, there was no code of care practice for oral health. Routine dental check‐ups were not organised for residents of most homes. Although home staffs were generally given information about residents’ oral health and hygiene, the majority did not assist residents with oral hygiene. Home managers identified the following barriers to the use of dental services by residents: cost, communication problems with dental staff, journey to place of treatment, waiting time at the dental clinic, access to premises/clinic, lack of information on oral health and dental service availability, no one to accompany the person to the clinic, and health problems such as mobility, poor eyesight, hearing impairment and mental health status. Conclusion: Although most home managers appreciate the importance of oral health care for their residents, the residents still face many barriers to maintaining adequate oral health care and accessing dental services.     

Development of an index to measure oral health care priority among nursing staff

Objective: To develop an index to measure oral health care priority among nursing staff. Background: Nursing staff, working on hospital wards, at nursing homes and at other facilities, have to deal with oral health care and there are many reports about the low priority that is given to oral health care by nursing staff. It is difficult to measure oral health care priority among nursing staff. A Dental Coping Beliefs Scale (DCBS) index was used in an intervention study and was found to be easy to handle but did not have the ability to reveal significant differences in small study samples. A development process consisting of added items and item numbering by chance was carried out. During this process, different nursing staff test groups were used. The aim was to develop an oral health care priority index that can be used both on hospital wards and at special facilities to measure oral health care priority among nursing staff over time and between groups. Material and methods: Nursing staff at both special facilities and hospital wards and nursing students. Results: It was found that the index, the nursing DCBS, was more stable compared with the version that was used in the initial intervention study. It was also noted that its ability to discriminate between the items was improved. Conclusion: The nursing DCBS index is a suitable tool for use in further studies where the aim is to measure how different nursing staff groups give priority to and allocate responsibility for oral health care, even where study samples are small.     

An assessment of the oral health knowledge and recall after a dental talk amongst nurses working with elderly patients: a pilot study

Objective: To assess the oral health knowledge amongst nurses working with elderly people in a local hospital run by a Primary Care Trust before and after a dental training talk. Method: Nursing staff working at Swanage Cottage Hospital completed a questionnaire designed to assess their knowledge of dental decay, periodontal disease, oral hygiene, denture care and palliative care. One month after receiving a dental talk, the questionnaire was redistributed to the participants. A t‐test was used to compare the number of correct answers before and after the talk. Results: Twenty members of the nursing staff completed the initial questionnaire and 14 completed it 1 month after the talk. Prior to the talk, of the 45 questions, the mean number of correct answers per member of staff was 23.95 ± 3.83. One month after the talk this had risen by 25% to 34.9 ± 3.83. This increase was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: A dental talk to a group of nursing staff caring for elderly people in a local hospital produced a significant increase in the level of oral health care knowledge.     

Oral health care in private and small long-term care facilities: a qualitative study

Objective: Elderly people who are institutionalised receive qualified care. Among the services supplied, oral health care has not always been a priority. The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of oral health care provided to the elderly residents in long‐term care facilities (LTC) in Porto Alegre/RS city. Methods: Twelve private and small‐size LTCs (less than 20 residents) participated in this study. All supervisors and 36 carers were interviewed. The data obtained were organised according to the offer of oral health under the following categories: responsibility for oral care, oral care routines, difficulties carrying out oral care routines. Results: The procedures used most often in order of frequency were tooth brushing, prostheses cleaning, use of mouthwashes, soaking of prostheses and cleaning of the tongue. Among the difficulties mentioned were the high cost of dental assistance, the lack of co‐operation both by family members and by the elderly themselves, the oral and general health status of the elderly and the limited time available for carers to carry out the tasks. Oral care is conducted empirically, and the responsibility is left to the carers. Conclusions: Analysis of the statements given reveals that oral care does not follow any kind of protocol or standardisation. The persistence of this situation could lead to unsatisfactory oral health care in private and small LTC facilities.