Steric Complementarity in the Decoding Center Is Important for tRNA Selection by the Ribosome

Accurate tRNA selection by the ribosome is essential for the synthesis of functional proteins. Previous structural studies indicated that the ribosome distinguishes between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs by monitoring the geometry of the codon–anticodon helix in the decoding center using the universally conserved 16S ribosomal RNA bases G530, A1492 and A1493. These bases form hydrogen bonds with the 2′-hydroxyl groups of the codon–anticodon helix, which are expected to be disrupted with a near-cognate codon–anticodon helix. However, a recent structural study showed that G530, A1492 and A1493 form hydrogen bonds in a manner identical with that of both cognate and near-cognate codon–anticodon helices. To understand how the ribosome discriminates between cognate and near-cognate tRNAs, we made 2′-deoxynucleotide and 2′-fluoro substituted mRNAs, which disrupt the hydrogen bonds between the A site codon and G530, A1492 and A1493. Our results show that multiple 2′-deoxynucleotide substitutions in the mRNA substantially inhibit tRNA selection, whereas multiple 2′-fluoro substitutions in the mRNA have only modest effects on tRNA selection. Furthermore, the miscoding antibiotics paromomycin and streptomycin rescue the defects in tRNA selection with the multiple 2′-deoxynucleotide substituted mRNA. These results suggest that steric complementarity in the decoding center is more important than the hydrogen bonds between the A site codon and G530, A1492 and A1493 for tRNA selection.     

Precise alignment of peptidyl tRNA by the decoding center is essential for EF-G-dependent translocation

Translocation is an essential step in the elongation cycle of the protein synthesis that allows for the continual incorporation of new amino acids to the growing polypeptide. Movement of mRNA and tRNAs within the ribosome is catalyzed by EF-G binding and GTP hydrolysis. The 30S subunit decoding center is crucial for the selection of the cognate tRNA. However, it is not clear whether the decoding center participates in translocation. We disrupted the interactions in the decoding center by mutating the universally conserved 16S rRNA bases G530, A1492, and A1493, and the effects of these mutations on translocation were studied. Our results show that point mutation of any of these 16S rRNA bases inhibits EF-G-dependent translocation. Furthermore, the mutant ribosomes showed increased puromycin reactivity in the pretranslocation complexes, indicating that the dynamic equilibrium of the peptidyl tRNA between the classical and hybrid-state configurations is influenced by contacts in the decoding center.     

Impact of P-Site tRNA and Antibiotics on Ribosome Mediated Protein Folding: Studies Using the Escherichia coli Ribosome

Background

The ribosome, which acts as a platform for mRNA encoded polypeptide synthesis, is also capable of assisting in folding of polypeptide chains. The peptidyl transferase center (PTC) that catalyzes peptide bond formation resides in the domain V of the 23S rRNA of the bacterial ribosome. Proper positioning of the 3′ –CCA ends of the A- and P-site tRNAs via specific interactions with the nucleotides of the PTC are crucial for peptidyl transferase activity. This RNA domain is also the center for ribosomal chaperoning activity. The unfolded polypeptide chains interact with the specific nucleotides of the PTC and are released in a folding competent form. In vitro transcribed RNA corresponding to this domain (bDV RNA) also displays chaperoning activity.

Results

The present study explores the effects of tRNAs, antibiotics that are A- and P-site PTC substrate analogs (puromycin and blasticidin) and macrolide antibiotics (erythromycin and josamycin) on the chaperoning ability of the E. coli ribosome and bDV RNA. Our studies using mRNA programmed ribosomes show that a tRNA positioned at the P-site effectively inhibits the ribosome''s chaperoning function. We also show that the antibiotic blasticidin (that mimics the interaction between 3′–CCA end of P/P-site tRNA with the PTC) is more effective in inhibiting ribosome and bDV RNA chaperoning ability than either puromycin or the macrolide antibiotics. Mutational studies of the bDV RNA could identify the nucleotides U2585 and G2252 (both of which interact with P-site tRNA) to be important for its chaperoning ability.

Conclusion

Both protein synthesis and their proper folding are crucial for maintenance of a functional cellular proteome. The PTC of the ribosome is attributed with both these abilities. The silencing of the chaperoning ability of the ribosome in the presence of P-site bound tRNA might be a way to segregate these two important functions.     

The role of SmpB and the ribosomal decoding center in licensing tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes

In bacteria, stalled ribosomes are recycled by a hybrid transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA). Like tRNA, tmRNA is aminoacylated with alanine and is delivered to the ribosome by EF-Tu, where it reacts with the growing polypeptide chain. tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes poses a challenge to our understanding of ribosome function because it occurs in the absence of a codon-anticodon interaction. Instead, tmRNA entry is licensed by the binding of its protein partner, SmpB, to the ribosomal decoding center. We analyzed a series of SmpB mutants and found that its C-terminal tail is essential for tmRNA accommodation but not for EF-Tu activation. We obtained evidence that the tail likely functions as a helix on the ribosome to promote accommodation and identified key residues in the tail essential for this step. In addition, our mutational analysis points to a role for the conserved K(131)GKK tail residues in trans-translation after peptidyl transfer to tmRNA, presumably EF-G-mediated translocation or translation of the tmRNA template. Surprisingly, analysis of A1492, A1493, and G530 mutants reveals that while these ribosomal nucleotides are essential for normal tRNA selection, they play little to no role in peptidyl transfer to tmRNA. These studies clarify how SmpB interacts with the ribosomal decoding center to license tmRNA entry into stalled ribosomes.     

Yeast initiator tRNA identity elements cooperate to influence multiple steps of translation initiation

All three kingdoms of life employ two methionine tRNAs, one for translation initiation and the other for insertion of methionines at internal positions within growing polypeptide chains. We have used a reconstituted yeast translation initiation system to explore the interactions of the initiator tRNA with the translation initiation machinery. Our data indicate that in addition to its previously characterized role in binding of the initiator tRNA to eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), the initiator-specific A1:U72 base pair at the top of the acceptor stem is important for the binding of the eIF2.GTP.Met-tRNA(i) ternary complex to the 40S ribosomal subunit. We have also shown that the initiator-specific G:C base pairs in the anticodon stem of the initiator tRNA are required for the strong thermodynamic coupling between binding of the ternary complex and mRNA to the ribosome. This coupling reflects interactions that occur within the complex upon recognition of the start codon, suggesting that these initiator-specific G:C pairs influence this step. The effect of these anticodon stem identity elements is influenced by bases in the T loop of the tRNA, suggesting that conformational coupling between the D-loop-T-loop substructure and the anticodon stem of the initiator tRNA may occur during AUG codon selection in the ribosomal P-site, similar to the conformational coupling that occurs in A-site tRNAs engaged in mRNA decoding during the elongation phase of protein synthesis.     

Biochemical characterization of the ribosomal decoding site

Prior to the emergence of crystal structures of the ribosome, different ribosomal functions were identified with specific regions of ribosomal RNA by biochemical and genetic approaches. In particular, three universally conserved bases of 16S rRNA, G530, A1492 and A1493, were implicated in the interaction of the incoming aminoacyl-tRNA with the 30S subunit and mRNA. The conserved region surrounding A1492 and A1493 was called the "decoding site", based on the results of chemical probing experiments and antibiotic resistance mutations. Crystallographic studies from the Ramakrishnan laboratory have now shown that G530 loop, A1492 and A1493 undergo localized conformational changes to form an RNA structure that positions these three bases to inspect the accuracy of the codon-anticodon match with high stereochemical precision, using A-minor interactions. Some results from the pre-X-ray era may provide clues to further aspects of the decoding process.     

Role of the three consecutive G:C base pairs conserved in the anticodon stem of initiator tRNAs in initiation of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli.

The three consecutive G:C base pairs, G29:C41, G30:C40, and G31:C39, are conserved in the anticodon stem of virtually all initiator tRNAs from eubacteria, eukaryotes, and archaebacteria. We show that these G:C base pairs are important for function of the tRNA in initiation of protein synthesis in vivo. We changed these base pairs individually and in combinations and analyzed the activities of the mutant Escherichia coli initiator tRNAs in initiation in vivo. For assessment of activity of the mutant tRNAs in vivo, mutations in the G:C base pairs were coupled to mutation in the anticodon sequence from CAU to CUA. Mutations in each of the G:C base pairs reduced activity of the mutant tRNA in initiation, with mutation in the second G:C base pair having the most severe effect. The greatly reduced activity of this C30:G40 mutant tRNA is not due to defects in aminoacylation or formulation of the tRNA or defects in base modification of the A37, next to the anticodon, which we had previously shown to be important for activity of the mutant tRNAs in initiation. The anticodon stem mutants are most likely affected specifically at the step of binding to the ribosomal P site. The pattern of cleavages in the anticodon loop of mutant tRNAs by S1 nuclease indicate that the G:C base pairs may be involved directly in interactions of the tRNA with components of the P site on the ribosome rather than indirectly by inducing a particular conformation of the anticodon loop critical for function of the tRNA in initiation.     

The interaction between C75 of tRNA and the A loop of the ribosome stimulates peptidyl transferase activity

Ribosomal variants carrying mutations in active site nucleotides are severely compromised in their ability to catalyze peptide bond formation (PT) with minimal aminoacyl tRNA substrates such as puromycin. However, catalysis of PT by these same ribosomes with intact aminoacyl tRNA substrates is uncompromised. These data suggest that these active site nucleotides play an important role in the positioning of minimal aminoacyl tRNA substrates but are not essential for catalysis per se when aminoacyl tRNAs are positioned by more remote interactions with the ribosome. Previously reported biochemical studies and atomic resolution X-ray structures identified a direct Watson-Crick interaction between C75 of the A-site substrate and G2553 of the 23S rRNA. Here we show that the addition of this single cytidine residue (the C75 equivalent) to puromycin is sufficient to suppress the deficiencies of active site ribosomal variants, thus restoring "tRNA-like" behavior to this minimal substrate. Studies of the binding parameters and the pH-dependence of catalysis with this minimal substrate indicate that the interaction between C75 and the ribosomal A loop is an essential feature for robust catalysis and further suggest that the observed effects of C75 on peptidyl transfer activity reflect previously reported conformational rearrangements in this active site.     

The ribosome as a molecular machine: the mechanism of tRNA-mRNA movement in translocation

Translocation of tRNA and mRNA through the ribosome is one of the most dynamic events during protein synthesis. In the cell, translocation is catalysed by EF-G (elongation factor G) and driven by GTP hydrolysis. Major unresolved questions are: how the movement is induced and what the moving parts of the ribosome are. Recent progress in time-resolved cryoelectron microscopy revealed trajectories of tRNA movement through the ribosome. Driven by thermal fluctuations, the ribosome spontaneously samples a large number of conformational states. The spontaneous movement of tRNAs through the ribosome is loosely coupled to the motions within the ribosome. EF-G stabilizes conformational states prone to translocation and promotes a conformational rearrangement of the ribosome (unlocking) that accelerates the rate-limiting step of translocation: the movement of the tRNA anticodons on the small ribosomal subunit. EF-G acts as a Brownian ratchet providing directional bias for movement at the cost of GTP hydrolysis.     

Neighbourhood of the central fold of the tRNA molecule bound to the E. coli ribosome--affinity labeling studies with modified tRNAs carrying photoreactive probes attached to the dihydrouridine loop.

The neighbourhood of the dihydrouridine loop of tRNA molecule bound to E. coli ribosome has been studied by affinity labeling, using modified tRNAs carrying photoreactive azidonitrophenyl probes attached to the 3-(3-amino-3-carboxypropyl)-uridine located at position 20:1 of Lupin methionine elongator tRNA. The maximum distance between the pyrimidine ring and the azido group estimated for the two probes employed in this study is 10-11 A and 18-19 A, respectively. Cross-linking of the uncharged, modified tRNAs has been studied with poly(A, U, G) as a message, under conditions directing uncharged tRNAs preferentially to the ribosomal P-site. Modified tRNAs bind covalently to both ribosomal subunits with high yields upon irradiation of the respective non-covalent complexes. Proteins S7, L33 and L1 have been consistently found cross-linked to tRNAs modified with both probes, and S5 and L5 to tRNA modified with the longer probe. Surprisingly, an S5-tRNA cross-linking product is reproducibly found in a protein fraction prepared from the purified 50S subunit. Cross-linking to rRNAs is significant only for the longer probe and is stimulated 2-4 fold in the presence of poly(A,U,G). The cross-linking sites are located between nucleotides 1302 and 1398 in 16S rRNA and between nucleotides 2281 and 2358 in 23S rRNA.     

Archaeal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases interact with the ribosome to recycle tRNAs

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) are essential enzymes catalyzing the formation of aminoacyl-tRNAs, the immediate precursors for encoded peptides in ribosomal protein synthesis. Previous studies have suggested a link between tRNA aminoacylation and high-molecular-weight cellular complexes such as the cytoskeleton or ribosomes. However, the structural basis of these interactions and potential mechanistic implications are not well understood. To biochemically characterize these interactions we have used a system of two interacting archaeal aaRSs: an atypical methanogenic-type seryl-tRNA synthetase and an archaeal ArgRS. More specifically, we have shown by thermophoresis and surface plasmon resonance that these two aaRSs bind to the large ribosomal subunit with micromolar affinities. We have identified the L7/L12 stalk and the proteins located near the stalk base as the main sites for aaRS binding. Finally, we have performed a bioinformatics analysis of synonymous codons in the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus genome that supports a mechanism in which the deacylated tRNAs may be recharged by aaRSs bound to the ribosome and reused at the next occurrence of a codon encoding the same amino acid. These results suggest a mechanism of tRNA recycling in which aaRSs associate with the L7/L12 stalk region to recapture the tRNAs released from the preceding ribosome in polysomes.     

Flipping of the Ribosomal A-Site Adenines Provides a Basis for tRNA Selection

Ribosomes control the missense error rate of ~ 10^− 4 during translation though quantitative contributions of individual mechanistic steps of the conformational changes yet to be fully determined. Biochemical and biophysical studies led to a qualitative tRNA selection model in which ribosomal A-site residues A1492 and A1493 (A1492/3) flip out in response to cognate tRNA binding, promoting the subsequent reactions, but not in the case of near-cognate or non-cognate tRNA. However, this model was recently questioned by X-ray structures revealing conformations of extrahelical A1492/3 and domain closure of the decoding center in both cognate and near-cognate tRNA bound ribosome complexes, suggesting that the non-specific flipping of A1492/3 has no active role in tRNA selection. We explore this question by carrying out molecular dynamics simulations, aided with fluorescence and NMR experiments, to probe the free energy cost of extrahelical flipping of 1492/3 and the strain energy associated with domain conformational change. Our rigorous calculations demonstrate that the A1492/3 flipping is indeed a specific response to the binding of cognate tRNA, contributing 3 kcal/mol to the specificity of tRNA selection. Furthermore, the different A-minor interactions in cognate and near-cognate complexes propagate into the conformational strain and contribute another 4 kcal/mol in domain closure. The recent structure of ribosome with features of extrahelical A1492/3 and closed domain in near-cognate complex is reconciled by possible tautomerization of the wobble base pair in mRNA–tRNA. These results quantitatively rationalize other independent experimental observations and explain the ribosomal discrimination mechanism of selecting cognate versus near-cognate tRNA.     

Functions and interplay of the tRNA-binding sites of the ribosome

The ribosome translates the genetic information of an mRNA molecule into a sequence of amino acids. The ribosome utilizes tRNAs to connect elements of the RNA and protein worlds during protein synthesis, i.e. an anticodon as a unit of genetic information with the corresponding amino acid as a building unit of proteins. Three tRNA-binding sites are located on the ribosome, termed the A, P and E sites. In recent years the tRNA-binding sites have been localized on the ribosome by three different techniques, small-angle neutron scattering, cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray analyses of 70 S crystals. These high-resolution glimpses into various ribosomal states together with a large body of biochemical data reveal an intricate interplay between the tRNAs and the three ribosomal binding sites, providing an explanation for the remarkable features of the ribosome, such as the ability to select the correct ternary complex aminoacyl-tRNA.EF-Tu.GTP out of more than 40 extremely similar tRNA complexes, the precise movement of the tRNA(2).mRNA complex during translocation and the maintenance of the reading frame.     

Crystal structure of a 70S ribosome-tRNA complex reveals functional interactions and rearrangements

Our understanding of the mechanism of protein synthesis has undergone rapid progress in recent years as a result of low-resolution X-ray and cryo-EM structures of ribosome functional complexes and high-resolution structures of ribosomal subunits and vacant ribosomes. Here, we present the crystal structure of the Thermus thermophilus 70S ribosome containing a model mRNA and two tRNAs at 3.7 A resolution. Many structural details of the interactions between the ribosome, tRNA, and mRNA in the P and E sites and the ways in which tRNA structure is distorted by its interactions with the ribosome are seen. Differences between the conformations of vacant and tRNA-bound 70S ribosomes suggest an induced fit of the ribosome structure in response to tRNA binding, including significant changes in the peptidyl-transferase catalytic site.     

Positioning of CCA-arms of the A- and the P-tRNAs towards the 28S rRNA in the human ribosome

Nucleotides of 28S rRNA involved in binding of the human 80S ribosome with acceptor ends of the A site and the P site tRNAs were determined using two complementary approaches, namely, cross-linking with application of tRNA^Asp analogues substituted with 4-thiouridine in position 75 or 76 and hydroxyl radical footprinting with the use of the full sized tRNA and the tRNA deprived of the 3′-terminal trinucleotide CCA. In general, these 28S rRNA nucleotides are located in ribosomal regions homologous to the A, P and E sites of the prokaryotic 50S subunit. However, none of the approaches used discovered interactions of the apex of the large rRNA helix 80 with the acceptor end of the P site tRNA typical with prokaryotic ribosomes. Application of the results obtained to available atomic models of 50S and 60S subunits led us to a conclusion that the A site tRNA is actually present in both A/A and A/P states and the P site tRNA in the P/P and P/E states. Thus, the present study gives a biochemical confirmation of the data on the structure and dynamics of the mammalian ribosomal pretranslocation complex obtained with application of cryo-electron microscopy and single-molecule FRET [Budkevich et al., 2011]. Moreover, in our study, particular sets of 28S rRNA nucleotides involved in oscillations of tRNAs CCA-termini between their alternative locations in the mammalian 80S ribosome are revealed.     

Energy landscape of the ribosomal decoding center

The ribosome decodes the genetic information that resides in nucleic acids. A key component of the decoding mechanism is a conformational switch in the decoding center of the small ribosomal subunit discovered in high-resolution X-ray crystallography studies. It is known that small subunit nucleotides A1492 and A1493 flip out of helix 44 upon transfer RNA (tRNA) binding; however, the operation principles of this switch remain unknown. Replica molecular dynamics simulations reveal a low free energy barrier between flipped-out and flipped-in states, consistent with a switch that can be controlled by shifting the equilibrium between states. The barrier determined by the simulations is sufficiently small for the binding of ligands, such as tRNAs or aminoglycoside antibiotics, to shift the equilibrium.     

Universally conserved interactions between the ribosome and the anticodon stem-loop of A site tRNA important for translocation

The iterative movement of the tRNA-mRNA complex through the ribosome is a hallmark of the elongation phase of protein synthesis. We used synthetic anticodon stem-loop analogs (ASL) of tRNA(Phe) to systematically identify ribose 2'-hydroxyl groups that are essential for binding and translocation from the ribosomal A site. Our results show that 2'-hydroxyl groups at positions 33, 35, and 36 in the A site ASL are important for translocation. Consistent with the view that the molecular basis of translocation may be similar in all organisms, the 2'-hydroxyl groups at positions 35 and 36 in the ASL interact with universally conserved bases G530 and A1493, respectively, in 16S rRNA. Furthermore, these interactions are also essential for the decoding process, indicating a functional relationship between decoding and translocation.     

Contribution of 16S rRNA nucleotides forming the 30S subunit A and P sites to translation in Escherichia coli

Many contacts between the ribosome and its principal substrates, tRNA and mRNA, involve universally conserved rRNA nucleotides, implying their functional importance in translation. Here, we measure the in vivo translation activity conferred by substitution of each 16S rRNA base believed to contribute to the A or P site. We find that the 30S P site is generally more tolerant of mutation than the 30S A site. In the A site, A1493C or any substitution of G530 or A1492 results in complete loss of translation activity, while A1493U and A1493G decrease translation activity by >20-fold. Among the P-site nucleotides, A1339 is most critical; any mutation of A1339 confers a >18-fold decrease in translation activity. Regarding all other P-site bases, ribosomes harboring at least one substitution retain considerable activity, >10% that of control ribosomes. Moreover, several sets of multiple substitutions within the 30S P site fail to inactivate the ribosome. The robust nature of the 30S P site indicates that its interaction with the codon-anticodon helix is less stringent than that of the 30S A site. In addition, we show that G1338A suppresses phenotypes conferred by m(2)G966A and several multiple P-site substitutions, suggesting that adenine at position 1338 can stabilize tRNA interaction in the P site.     

Interaction of translation initiation factor IF1 with the E. coli ribosomal A site

Initiation Factor 1 (IF1) is required for the initiation of translation in Escherichia coli. However, the precise function of IF1 remains unknown. Current evidence suggests that IF1 is an RNA-binding protein that sits in the A site of the decoding region of 16 S rRNA. IF1 binding to 30 S subunits changes the reactivity of nucleotides in the A site to chemical probes. The N1 position of A1408 is enhanced, while the N1 positions of A1492 and A1493 are protected from reactivity with dimethyl sulfate (DMS). The N1-N2 positions of G530 are also protected from reactivity with kethoxal. Quantitative footprinting experiments show that the dissociation constant for IF1 binding to the 30 S subunit is 0.9 microM and that IF1 also alters the reactivity of a subset of Class III sites that are protected by tRNA, 50 S subunits, or aminoglycoside antibiotics. IF1 enhances the reactivity of the N1 position of A1413, A908, and A909 to DMS and the N1-N2 positions of G1487 to kethoxal. To characterize this RNA-protein interaction, several ribosomal mutants in the decoding region RNA were created, and IF1 binding to wild-type and mutant 30 S subunits was monitored by chemical modification and primer extension with allele-specific primers. The mutations C1407U, A1408G, A1492G, or A1493G disrupt IF1 binding to 30 S subunits, whereas the mutations G530A, U1406A, U1406G, G1491U, U1495A, U1495C, or U1495G had little effect on IF1 binding. Disruption of IF1 binding correlates with the deleterious phenotypic effects of certain mutations. IF1 binding to the A site of the 30 S subunit may modulate subunit association and the fidelity of tRNA selection in the P site through conformational changes in the 16 S rRNA.     

Single-molecule fluorescence measurements of ribosomal translocation dynamics

We employ single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) to study structural dynamics over the first two elongation cycles of protein synthesis, using ribosomes containing either Cy3-labeled ribosomal protein L11 and A- or P-site Cy5-labeled tRNA or Cy3- and Cy5-labeled tRNAs. Pretranslocation (PRE) complexes demonstrate fluctuations between classical and hybrid forms, with concerted motions of tRNAs away from L11 and from each other when classical complex converts to hybrid complex. EF-G?GTP binding to both hybrid and classical PRE complexes halts these fluctuations prior to catalyzing translocation to form the posttranslocation (POST) complex. EF-G dependent translocation from the classical PRE complex proceeds via transient formation of a short-lived hybrid intermediate. A-site binding of either EF-G to the PRE complex or of aminoacyl-tRNA?EF-Tu ternary complex to the POST complex markedly suppresses ribosome conformational lability.