An aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase with a defunct editing site

Many aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) contain two active sites, a synthetic site catalyzing aminoacyl-adenylate formation and tRNA aminoacylation and a second editing or proofreading site that hydrolyzes misactivated adenylates or mischarged tRNAs. The combined activities of these two sites lead to rigorous accuracy in tRNA aminoacylation, and both activities are essential to LeuRS and other aaRSs. Here, we describe studies of the human mitochondrial (hs mt) LeuRS indicating that the two active sites of this enzyme have undergone functional changes that impact how accurate aminoacylation is achieved. The sequence of the hs mt LeuRS closely resembles a bacterial LeuRS overall but displays significant variability in regions of the editing site. Studies comparing Escherichia coli and hs mt LeuRS reveal that the proofreading activity of the mt enzyme is disrupted by these sequence changes, as significant levels of Ile-tRNA(Leu) are formed in the presence of high concentrations of the noncognate amino acid. Experiments monitoring deacylation of Ile-tRNA(Leu) and misactivated adenylate turnover revealed that the editing active site is not operational. However, hs mt LeuRS has weaker binding affinities for both cognate and noncognate amino acids relative to the E. coli enzyme and an elevated discrimination ratio. Therefore, the enzyme achieves fidelity using a more specific synthetic active site that is not prone to errors under physiological conditions. This enhanced specificity must compensate for the presence of a defunct editing site and ensures translational accuracy.     

Editing by a tRNA synthetase: DNA aptamer-induced translocation and hydrolysis of a misactivated amino acid

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases establish the rules of the genetic code by aminoacylation reactions. Occasional activation of the wrong amino acid can lead to errors of protein synthesis. For isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase, these errors are reduced by tRNA-dependent hydrolytic editing reactions that occur at a site 25 A from the active site. These reactions require that the misactivated amino acid be translocated from the active site to the center for editing. One mechanism describes translocation as requiring the mischarging of tRNA followed by a conformational change in the tRNA that moves the amino acid from one site to the other. Here a specific DNA aptamer is investigated. The aptamer can stimulate amino acid-specific editing but cannot be aminoacylated. Although the aptamer could in principle stimulate hydrolysis of a misactivated amino acid by an idiosyncratic mechanism, the aptamer is shown here to induce translocation and hydrolysis of misactivated aminoacyl adenylate at the same site as that seen with the tRNA cofactor. Thus, translocation to the site for editing does not require joining of the amino acid to the nucleic acid. Further experiments demonstrated that aptamer-induced editing is sensitive to aptamer sequence and that the aptamer is directed to a site other than the active site or tRNA binding site of the enzyme.     

The balance between pre- and post-transfer editing in tRNA synthetases

The fidelity of tRNA aminoacylation is dependent in part on amino acid editing mechanisms. A hydrolytic activity that clears mischarged tRNAs typically resides in an active site on the tRNA synthetase that is distinct from its synthetic aminoacylation active site. A second pre-transfer editing pathway that hydrolyzes the tRNA synthetase aminoacyl adenylate intermediate can also be activated. Pre- and post-transfer editing activities can co-exist within a single tRNA synthetase resulting in a redundancy of fidelity mechanisms. However, in most cases one pathway appears to dominate, but when compromised, the secondary pathway can be activated to suppress tRNA synthetase infidelities.     

Attenuation of the editing activity of the Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase allows incorporation of novel amino acids into proteins in vivo

The fidelity of translation is dependent on the specificity of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs). The aaRSs that activate the hydrophobic amino acids leucine, isoleucine, and valine employ a proofreading mechanism that hydrolyzes noncognate aminoacyl adenylates and misaminoacylated tRNAs. Discrimination between structurally similar amino acids by these AARSs is believed to operate by a double-sieve principle, wherein a separate editing domain governs hydrolysis on the basis of the size and hydrophilicity of the amino acid side chain. Leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) relies on its editing function to correct misaminoacylation of tRNA(Leu) by isoleucine and methionine. Thr252 of Escherichia coli LeuRS has been shown previously to be important in defining the size of the editing cavity. Here we report the isolation and characterization of three LeuRS mutants with point mutations at this position (T252Y, T252L, and T252F). The proofreading activity of the synthetase is significantly impaired when an amino acid bulkier than threonine is introduced. The rate of misaminoacylation of tRNA(Leu) by isoleucine and valine increases with the increasing size of the amino acid substituent at position 252, and the noncognate amino acids norvaline and norleucine are inserted efficiently at the leucine sites of recombinant proteins under conditions of constitutive overexpression of the T252Y mutant in E. coli. In addition, the unsaturated amino acids allylglycine, homoallylglycine, homopropargylglycine, and 2-butynylalanine all support protein synthesis in E. coli hosts harboring the mutant synthetase. These results demonstrate that programmed manipulation of the editing cavity can allow in vivo incorporation of novel protein building blocks.     

tRNA-dependent aminoacyl-adenylate hydrolysis by a nonediting class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase

Glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase generates Gln-tRNA(Gln) 10(7)-fold more efficiently than Glu-tRNA(Gln) and requires tRNA to synthesize the activated aminoacyl adenylate in the first step of the reaction. To examine the role of tRNA in amino acid activation more closely, several assays employing a tRNA analog in which the 2'-OH group at the 3'-terminal A76 nucleotide is replaced with hydrogen (tRNA(2'HGln)) were developed. These experiments revealed a 10(4)-fold reduction in kcat/Km in the presence of the analog, suggesting a direct catalytic role for tRNA in the activation reaction. The catalytic importance of the A76 2'-OH group in aminoacylation mirrors a similar role for this moiety that has recently been demonstrated during peptidyl transfer on the ribosome. Unexpectedly, tracking of Gln-AMP formation utilizing an alpha-32P-labeled ATP substrate in the presence of tRNA(2'HGln) showed that AMP accumulates 5-fold more rapidly than Gln-AMP. A cold-trapping experiment revealed that the nonenzymatic rate of Gln-AMP hydrolysis is too slow to account for the rapid AMP formation; hence, the hydrolysis of Gln-AMP to form glutamine and AMP must be directly catalyzed by the GlnRS x tRNA(2'HGln) complex. This hydrolysis of glutaminyl adenylate represents a novel reaction that is directly analogous to the pre-transfer editing hydrolysis of noncognate aminoacyl adenylates by editing synthetases such as isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase. Because glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase does not possess a spatially separate editing domain, these data demonstrate that a pre-transfer editing-like reaction can occur within the synthetic site of a class I tRNA synthetase.     

Transiently misacylated tRNA is a primer for editing of misactivated adenylates by class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

The genetic code depends on amino acid fine structure discrimination by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. For isoleucyl- (IleRS) and valyl-tRNA synthetases (ValRS), reactions that hydrolyze misactivated noncognate amino acids help to achieve high accuracy in aminoacylation. Two editing pathways contribute to aminoacylation fidelity: pretransfer and post-transfer. In pretransfer editing, the misactivated amino acid is hydrolyzed as an aminoacyl adenylate, while in post-transfer editing a misacylated tRNA is deacylated. Both reactions are dependent on a tRNA cofactor and require translocation to a site located approximately 30 A from the site of amino acid activation. Using a series of 3'-end modified tRNAs that are deficient in either aminoacylation, deacylation, or both, total editing (the sum of pre- and post-transfer editing) was shown to require both aminoacylation and deacylation activities. These and additional results with IleRS are consistent with a post-transfer deacylation event initiating formation of an editing-active enzyme/tRNA complex. In this state, the primed complex processively edits misactivated valyl-adenylate via the pretransfer route. Thus, misacylated tRNA is an obligatory intermediate for editing by either pathway.     

Pre-transfer editing by class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase: role of aminoacylation active site in "selective release" of noncognate amino acids

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of cognate amino acids to specific tRNA molecules. To prevent potential errors in protein synthesis caused by misactivation of noncognate amino acids, some synthetases have evolved editing mechanisms to hydrolyze misactivated amino acids (pre-transfer editing) or misacylated tRNAs (post-transfer editing). In the case of post-transfer editing, synthetases employ a separate editing domain that is distinct from the site of amino acid activation, and the mechanism is believed to involve shuttling of the flexible CCA-3' end of the tRNA from the synthetic active site to the site of hydrolysis. The mechanism of pre-transfer editing is less well understood, and in most cases, the exact site of pre-transfer editing has not been conclusively identified. Here, we probe the pre-transfer editing activity of class II prolyl-tRNA synthetases from five species representing all three kingdoms of life. To locate the site of pre-transfer editing, truncation mutants were constructed by deleting the insertion domain characteristic of bacterial prolyl-tRNA synthetase species, which is the site of post-transfer editing, or the N- or C-terminal extension domains of eukaryotic and archaeal enzymes. In addition, the pre-transfer editing mechanism of Escherichia coli prolyl-tRNA synthetase was probed in detail. These studies show that a separate editing domain is not required for pre-transfer editing by prolyl-tRNA synthetase. The aminoacylation active site plays a significant role in preserving the fidelity of translation by acting as a filter that selectively releases non-cognate adenylates into solution, while protecting the cognate adenylate from hydrolysis.     

Role of tRNA amino acid-accepting end in aminoacylation and its quality control

Aminoacyl–tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are remarkable enzymes that are in charge of the accurate recognition and ligation of amino acids and tRNA molecules. The greatest difficulty in accurate aminoacylation appears to be in discriminating between highly similar amino acids. To reduce mischarging of tRNAs by non-cognate amino acids, aaRSs have evolved an editing activity in a second active site to cleave the incorrect aminoacyl–tRNAs. Editing occurs after translocation of the aminoacyl–CCA₇₆ end to the editing site, switching between a hairpin and a helical conformation for aminoacylation and editing. Here, we studied the consequence of nucleotide changes in the CCA₇₆ accepting end of tRNA^Leu during the aminoacylation and editing reactions. The analysis showed that the terminal A₇₆ is essential for both reactions, suggesting that critical interactions occur in the two catalytic sites. Substitutions of C₇₄ and C₇₅ selectively decreased aminoacylation keeping nearly unaffected editing. These mutations might favor the regular helical conformation required to reach the editing site. Mutating the editing domain residues that contribute to CCA₇₆ binding reduced the aminoacylation fidelity leading to cell-toxicity in the presence of non-cognate amino acids. Collectively, the data show how protein synthesis quality is controlled by the CCA₇₆ homogeneity of tRNAs.     

A new mechanism of post-transfer editing by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases: catalysis of hydrolytic reaction by bacterial-type prolyl-tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases are enzymes that specifically attach amino acids to cognate tRNAs for use in the ribosomal stage of translation. For many aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, the required level of amino acid specificity is achieved either by specific hydrolysis of misactivated aminoacyl-adenylate intermediate (pre-transfer editing) or by hydrolysis of the mischarged aminoacyl-tRNA (post-transfer editing). To investigate the mechanism of post-transfer editing of alanine by prolyl-tRNA synthetase from the pathogenic bacteria Enterococcus faecalis, we used molecular modeling, molecular dynamic simulations, quantum mechanical (QM) calculations, site-directed mutagenesis of the enzyme, and tRNA modification. The results support a new tRNA-assisted mechanism of hydrolysis of misacylated Ala-tRNA^Pro. The most important functional element of this catalytic mechanism is the 2′-OH group of the terminal adenosine 76 of Ala-tRNA^Pro, which forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group of the alanine residue, strongly facilitating hydrolysis. Hydrolysis was shown by QM methods to proceed via a general acid-base catalysis mechanism involving two functionally distinct water molecules. The transition state of the reaction was identified. Amino acid residues of the editing active site participate in the coordination of substrate and both attacking and assisting water molecules, performing the proton transfer to the 3′-O atom of A76.     

Alternative pathways for editing non-cognate amino acids by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.

Evidence is presented that the editing mechanisms of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase operate by two alternative pathways: pre-transfer, by hydrolysis of the non-cognate aminoacyl adenylate; post-transfer, by hydrolysis of the mischarged tRNA. The methionyl-tRNA synthetases from Escherichia coli and Bacillus stearothermophilus and isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase from E. coli, for example, are shown to reject misactivated homocysteine rapidly by the pre-transfer route. A novel feature of this reaction is that homocysteine thiolactone is formed by the facile cyclisation of the homocysteinyl adenylate. Valyl-tRNA synthetases, on the other hand, reject the more readily activated non-cognate amino acids by primarily the post-transfer route. The features governing the choice of pathway are discussed.     

On the Mechanism and Origin of Isoleucyl-tRNA Synthetase Editing against Norvaline

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), the enzymes responsible for coupling tRNAs to their cognate amino acids, minimize translational errors by intrinsic hydrolytic editing. Here, we compared norvaline (Nva), a linear amino acid not coded for protein synthesis, to the proteinogenic, branched valine (Val) in their propensity to mistranslate isoleucine (Ile) in proteins. We show that in the synthetic site of isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase (IleRS), Nva and Val are activated and transferred to tRNA at similar rates. The efficiency of the synthetic site in pre-transfer editing of Nva and Val also appears to be similar. Post-transfer editing was, however, more rapid with Nva and consequently IleRS misaminoacylates Nva-tRNA^Ile at slower rate than Val-tRNA^Ile. Accordingly, an Escherichia coli strain lacking IleRS post-transfer editing misincorporated Nva and Val in the proteome to a similar extent and at the same Ile positions. However, Nva mistranslation inflicted higher toxicity than Val, in agreement with IleRS editing being optimized for hydrolysis of Nva-tRNA^Ile. Furthermore, we found that the evolutionary-related IleRS, leucyl- and valyl-tRNA synthetases (I/L/VRSs), all efficiently hydrolyze Nva-tRNAs even when editing of Nva seems redundant. We thus hypothesize that editing of Nva-tRNAs had already existed in the last common ancestor of I/L/VRSs, and that the editing domain of I/L/VRSs had primarily evolved to prevent infiltration of Nva into modern proteins.     

Yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus) aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Isolation and some properties of enzyme-bound valyl adenylate and seryl adenylate.

As a continuation of our studies on plant (yellow lupin, Lupinus luteus) aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases we describe here formation and some properties of valyl-tRNA synthetase-bound valyl adenylate (EVal(Val-AMP)) and seryl-tRNA synthetase-bound seryl adenylate (ESer(Ser-AMP)). Valyl-tRNA synthetase-bound valyl adenylate was detected and isolated by several approaches in the pH range 6--10. In that range inorganic pyrophosphatase increases the amount of valyl adenylate by factor 1.8 regardless of pH. 50% of valine from the EVal(Val-AMP) complex isolated by Sephadex G-100 gel filtration was transferred to tRNA with a rate constant greater than 4 min-1 (pH 6.2, 10 degrees C). The ratio of valine to AMP in the enzyme-bound valyl adenylate is 1 : 1 and it is not changed by the presence of periodate-oxidized tRNA. In contrast to enzyme-bound valyl adenylate, formation of ESer(Ser-AMP) is very sensitive to pH. Inorganic pyrophosphatase increases the amount of seryl adenylate by a factor 6 at pH 8.0 and 30 at pH 6.9 60% of serine from the ESer(Ser-AMP) complex was transferred to tRNA with a rate constant greater than 4 min-1 (pH 8.0, 0 degrees C). The ratio of serine to AMP in the enzyme-bound seryl adenylate is 1 : 1. The rate of synthesis of the enzyme-bound aminoacyl adenylates was measured by ATP-PPi exchange. Michaelis constants for the substrates of valyl-tRNA and seryl-tRNA synthetases in ATP-PPi exchange were determined. Effects of pH, MgCl2 and KCl on the initial velocity of aminoacyl adenylate formation are described. For comparison, catalytic indices in the aminoacylation reactions catalyzed by both lupin enzymes are given and effects of pH, MgCl2 and KCl on tRNA aminoacylation are presented as well. Under some conditions, e.g. at low pH or high salt concentration, lupin valyl-tRNA and seryl-tRNA synthetase are active exclusively in ATP-PPi exchange reaction.     

Transfer RNA modulates the editing mechanism used by class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases catalyze the attachment of amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. To prevent errors in protein synthesis, many synthetases have evolved editing pathways by which misactivated amino acids (pre-transfer editing) and misacylated tRNAs (post-transfer editing) are hydrolyzed. Previous studies have shown that class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS) possesses both pre- and post-transfer editing functions against noncognate alanine. To assess the relative contributions of pre- and post-transfer editing, presented herein are kinetic studies of an Escherichia coli ProRS mutant in which post-transfer editing is selectively inactivated, effectively isolating the pre-transfer editing pathway. When post-transfer editing is abolished, substantial levels of alanine mischarging are observed under saturating amino acid conditions, indicating that pre-transfer editing alone cannot prevent the formation of Ala-tRNA Pro. Steady-state kinetic parameters for aminoacylation measured under these conditions reveal that the preference for proline over alanine is 2000-fold, which is well within the regime where editing is required. Simultaneous measurement of AMP and Ala-tRNA Pro formation in the presence of tRNA Pro suggested that misactivated alanine is efficiently transferred to tRNA to form the mischarged product. In the absence of tRNA, enzyme-catalyzed Ala-AMP hydrolysis is the dominant form of editing, with "selective release" of noncognate adenylate from the active site constituting a minor pathway. Studies with human and Methanococcus jannaschii ProRS, which lack a post-transfer editing domain, suggest that enzymatic pre-transfer editing occurs within the aminoacylation active site. Taken together, the results reported herein illustrate how both pre- and post-transfer editing pathways work in concert to ensure accurate aminoacylation by ProRS.     

Errors from selective disruption of the editing center in a tRNA synthetase

Some aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have two catalytic centers that together achieve fine-structure discrimination of closely similar amino acids. The role of tRNA is to stimulate translocation of a misactivated amino acid from the active site to the editing site where the misactivated substrate is eliminated by hydrolysis. Using isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase as an example, we placed mutations in the catalytic center for editing at residues strongly conserved from bacteria to humans. A particular single substitution and one double substitution resulted in production of mischarged tRNA, by interfering specifically with the chemical step of hydrolytic editing. The substitutions affected neither amino acid activation nor aminoacylation, with the cognate amino acid. Thus, because of the demonstrated functional independence of the two catalytic sites, errors of aminoacylation can be generated by selective mutations in the center for editing.     

Redesigning the stereospecificity of tyrosyl‐tRNA synthetase

d ‐Amino acids are largely excluded from protein synthesis, yet they are of great interest in biotechnology. Unnatural amino acids have been introduced into proteins using engineered aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), and this strategy might be applicable to d ‐amino acids. Several aaRSs can aminoacylate their tRNA with a d ‐amino acid; of these, tyrosyl‐tRNA synthetase (TyrRS) has the weakest stereospecificity. We use computational protein design to suggest active site mutations in Escherichia coli TyrRS that could increase its d ‐Tyr binding further, relative to l ‐Tyr. The mutations selected all modify one or more sidechain charges in the Tyr binding pocket. We test their effect by probing the aminoacyl‐adenylation reaction through pyrophosphate exchange experiments. We also perform extensive alchemical free energy simulations to obtain l ‐Tyr/d ‐Tyr binding free energy differences. Agreement with experiment is good, validating the structural models and detailed thermodynamic predictions the simulations provide. The TyrRS stereospecificity proves hard to engineer through charge‐altering mutations in the first and second coordination shells of the Tyr ammonium group. Of six mutants tested, two are active towards d ‐Tyr; one of these has an inverted stereospecificity, with a large preference for d ‐Tyr. However, its activity is low. Evidently, the TyrRS stereospecificity is robust towards charge rearrangements near the ligand. Future design may have to consider more distant and/or electrically neutral target mutations, and possibly design for binding of the transition state, whose structure however can only be modeled. Proteins 2016; 84:240–253. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A conserved threonine within Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase prevents hydrolytic editing of leucyl-tRNALeu

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases ensure the fidelity of protein synthesis by accurately selecting and activating cognate amino acids for aminoacylation of the correct tRNA. Some tRNA synthetases have evolved an editing active site that is separate from the amino acid activation site providing two steps or "sieves" for amino acid selection. These two sieves rely on different strategies for amino acid recognition to significantly enhance the accuracy of aminoacylation. We have performed alanine scanning mutagenesis in a conserved threonine-rich region of the Escherichia coli leucyl-tRNA synthetase's CP1 domain that is hypothesized to contain a putative editing active site. Characterization of purified mutant proteins led to the identification of a single conserved threonine that prevents the cognate leucine amino acid from being hydrolyzed after aminoacylation of the tRNA. Mutation of this threonine to an alanine eliminates discrimination of the cognate amino acid in the editing active site. This provides a molecular example of an amino acid discrimination mechanism in the tRNA synthetase's editing active site.     

Nucleotide determinants for tRNA-dependent amino acid discrimination by a class I tRNA synthetase

The high accuracy of the genetic code relies on the ability of tRNA synthetases to discriminate rigorously between closely similar amino acids. While the enzymes can detect differences between closely similar amino acids at an accuracy of about 1 part in 100-200, a finer discrimination requires the presence of the cognate tRNA. The role of the tRNA is to direct the misactivated amino acid to a distinct catalytic site for editing where hydrolysis occurs. Previous work showed that three nucleotides at the corner of the L-shaped tRNA were collectively required. Here we show that each of these nucleotides individually contributes to the efficiency of editing. However, all are dispensable for the chemical step of hydrolysis. Instead, these nucleotides are required for translocation of a misactivated amino acid from the active site to the center for editing.     

Achieving error-free translation; the mechanism of proofreading of threonyl-tRNA synthetase at atomic resolution

The fidelity of aminoacylation of tRNA(Thr) by the threonyl-tRNA synthetase (ThrRS) requires the discrimination of the cognate substrate threonine from the noncognate serine. Misacylation by serine is corrected in a proofreading or editing step. An editing site has been located 39 A away from the aminoacylation site. We report the crystal structures of this editing domain in its apo form and in complex with the serine product, and with two nonhydrolyzable analogs of potential substrates: the terminal tRNA adenosine charged with serine, and seryl adenylate. The structures show how serine is recognized, and threonine rejected, and provide the structural basis for the editing mechanism, a water-mediated hydrolysis of the mischarged tRNA. When the adenylate analog binds in the editing site, a phosphate oxygen takes the place of one of the catalytic water molecules, thereby blocking the reaction. This rules out a correction mechanism that would occur before the binding of the amino acid on the tRNA.     

Enzyme hyperspecificity. Rejection of threonine by the valyl-tRNA synthetase by misacylation and hydrolytic editing.

Valyl-tRNA synthetase from Bacillus stearothermophilus activates thereonine and forms a 1:1 complex with threonyl adenylate, but it does not catalyze the net formation of threonyl-tRNAVal at pH 7.78 and 25 degrees C in the quenched flow apparatus it decomposes at a rate constant of 36s-1. During this process there is a transient formation of Thr-tRNAVal reaching a maximum at 25 ms and rapidly falling to zero after 150 ms. At the peak, 22% of the (14C) threonine from the complex is present as (14C) Thr-tRNA. The reaction may be quenched with phenol and the partially mischarged tRNA isolated. The enzyme catalyzes its hydrolysis with a rate constant of 40s-1. The data fit a kinetic scheme in which 62% of the threonine from the threonyl adenylate is transferred to the tRNA. This may be compared with the rate constant of 12s-1 at which 84% of the valine is transferred to tRNAVal from the enzyme-bound valyl adenylate, and the rate constant of 0.015s-1 for the subsequent hydrolysis of Val-tRNAVal. Inhibition studies indicate a distinct second site for hydrolysis. The translocation of the aminoacyl moiety between the two sites could be mediated by a transfer between the 2'-and 3'-OH groups of the terminal adenosine fo the tRNA. The hyperspecificity of the enzyme is based on discriminating between the two competing substrates twice: once against the undesired substrate in the synthetic step, and once against the desired substrate in the destructive step.