Evaluation of results in aesthetic plastic surgery: preliminary observations on mammaplasty

Aesthetic plastic surgery has received wide public attention in the past few years. Expectations of patients regarding results have been exaggerated; the real place and medical importance of the procedures are still not clear because of a lack of more objective evidence. This study discusses the difficulties encountered related to the scientific evaluation of the aesthetic operations and proposes alternatives for assessment. A frequently performed procedure, reduction mammaplasty, is presented as an example, with its specific evaluation.     

Care of maxillofacial injuries: survey of plastic surgeons.

The purpose of this survey was to evaluate the current trends in the care of facial trauma. Data were obtained through the responses of a survey mailed to all those members and candidates listed in the 1989 American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons Directory. A total of 2777 questionnaires were sent, with 1113 (40 percent) returned by means of a self-addressed envelope. Demographic results show that over 70 percent of the treating plastic surgeons fall within the age range 30 to 50 years. Although significant advances have occurred, treatment goals have remained unchanged. These center around the principles of accurate reduction and precise stabilization of fracture segments. The results of this survey reveal that a number of acceptable techniques were employed in the surgical repair of mandibular and zygomatic complex fractures. In the care of Le Fort III fractures, 59 percent of the respondents preferred the use of miniplates and screws for stabilization. Only 26.8 percent believed that facial fracture repair should be performed within the initial 24 hours. With frontal sinus fractures, the vast majority of plastic surgeons (82.1 percent) obtained a neurosurgical consultation. When the posterior wall was involved, 45.6 percent favored removal of the sinus mucosa, 29.7 percent obliterated the frontal sinus with a variety of autogenous materials, while 20.5 percent preferred cranialization. In summary, this survey shows a wide variation in the practice of facial fracture management within the plastic surgical community.     

The evolution of the midface lift in aesthetic plastic surgery

The midface lift has recently gained significant popularity with many surgeons. It allows the surgeon an opportunity to achieve greater facial harmony with facial rejuvenation procedures by correcting midfacial atrophy, addressing the tear trough deformity, and correcting the perceived malposition of the malar fat pad. This article examines the history of midfacial procedures. Surgical attempts at improving the aging face have evolved from minimal excisions and skin closure to aggressive dissections at multiple planes. The midface target area is peripheral to classic approaches, and its correction has required further anterior dissection from a distance or direct access centrally. Ultimately, conquering the stigmata of midface aging is entirely related to vectors and volume.     

The evolution of the brow lift in aesthetic plastic surgery

For nearly 100 years, aesthetic improvement of the aging face has included surgical elevation of the brow. Early attempts to correct brow ptosis were largely unsuccessful. Recognizing the need to modify the frown muscles heralded the achievement of results previously unobtainable. Within the past decade, the minimal incision approach to brow lifting afforded with the endoscope radically changed surgical options in forehead rejuvenation. Further advances have added to these options and have provided a palette of alternatives in aesthetic correction of the upper one-third of the aging face.     

Current preferences for breast reduction techniques: a survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002

The purpose of this survey was to assess the current trends in breast reduction techniques and to compare satisfaction rates and complications associated with traditional incision and limited incision techniques. In September of 2002, a breast reduction survey was sent to 1500 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; 554 of the members returned the survey. Questions elicited categorical answers, and the data were evaluated using the chi-square test and the comparison of two proportions. The results showed that 56 percent of the respondents use only the inferior pedicle and Wise pattern techniques, whereas 6.9 percent of the respondents use only the limited incision techniques. Physician satisfaction was rated as 4 on a scale of 1 (unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) for both the limited incision and traditional incision groups. Patient satisfaction was rated as 4 for the limited incision group and as 5 for the traditional incision group. This difference in patient satisfaction per surgeon was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The traditional group reported a lower complication rate than did the limited incision group (p < 0.05). The most frequent complications for the traditional incision group were compared with those of the limited incision group. Practice profiles, liposuction, and opinions regarding future changes in breast surgery were also analyzed. The majority of surgeons reported that they did not anticipate changing their practices to accommodate advances in limited incision techniques; however, 89 percent reported that the new limited incision techniques and liposuction are trends that are here to stay.     

Cosmetic surgery in times of recession: macroeconomics for plastic surgeons

Periods of economic downturn place special demands on the plastic surgeon whose practice involves a large amount of cosmetic surgery. When determining strategy during difficult economic times, it is useful to understand the macroeconomic background of these downturns and to draw lessons from businesses in other service industries. Business cycles and monetary policy determine the overall environment in which plastic surgery is practiced. Plastic surgeons can take both defensive and proactive steps to maintain their profits during recessions and to prepare for the inevitable upturn. Care should also be taken when selecting pricing strategy during economic slowdowns.     

Antibiotic use in aesthetic surgery: a national survey and literature review

Although much has been written regarding the use of antibiotics in surgery, no clear guidelines exist in the literature regarding the use of antibiotics in aesthetic surgery. To determine the pattern of antibiotic use in aesthetic surgery, a comprehensive survey was mailed to 6000 American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons members and candidates. A total of 1767 completed responses were returned, which represents a response rate of 30 percent. The type, route, and duration of antibiotic administration are reported for 10 common cosmetic surgical procedures. The results of the survey confirmed that there is widespread use of antibiotics in aesthetic surgery. To provide guidelines for proper antibiotic use, the current literature was extensively reviewed. The authors found little or no correlation between reported clinical practice and the literature. It is hoped that this study will stimulate further investigation into this area of aesthetic surgery.     

Residency training in plastic surgery: a survey of educational goals

With the advent of integrative plastic surgical training programs, requirements for earlier specialization decisions, and an increasing subspecialization within the practice of plastic surgery, the educational goals of residency training may have changed. The duration and extent of training required are also currently being questioned. This study was performed to better understand the necessary roles of plastic surgery residencies and to determine how these demands might optimally be met. Of 151 practicing plastic surgeons in the Ontario, Canada, region, 81 (53.6 percent) responded to a survey. General agreement was that 2 years was an optimal length of time for core surgical training, which should then be followed by at least 3 years of plastic surgical training. Opinions on the ideal length of time training in specific medical and surgical disciplines are discussed. Overall, respondents thought that two thirds of training should occur in tertiary care centers, with the remaining time spent at smaller community centers and private clinics. Nearly half of respondents thought that research training should be a mandatory part of the residency, although the amount of protected time for this activity varied substantially. Most thought that unrestricted elective time should also be available. Academic plastic surgeons rated the importance of research training (p < 0.01), critical appraisal skills (p < 0.05), and teaching skills (p < 0.05) as significantly more important than did their nonacademic colleagues. The authors present results from the Ontario region and a template for determining optimal characteristics for training programs. Further investigation may be of timely importance during a foreseeable future transition from traditional to integrative plastic surgery residency training.