腹腔镜肝癌切除术与开放式肝癌切除术的疗效比较研究

目的:探讨腹腔镜肝癌切除手术治疗原发性肝癌的可行性及安全性。方法:选取2008年6月至2011年1月在我院行腹腔镜肝癌切除术的30例患者作为研究对象,另外选择同期在我院行开放式肝癌切除术的30例患者作为对照。结果:30例均在腹腔镜下成功地完成手术,其中22例行腹腔镜局部切除术,8例行肝左外叶切除术。手术时间103-142 min,出血量60-480mL,术后均未发生严重并发症,术后平均住院8.6 d。术后随访18~36个月,局部复发或种植性转移率与对照组无显著差异。结论:腹腔镜肝癌切除术是安全可行治疗原发性肝癌的手术方式。     

腹腔镜与传统开腹手术对胃癌临床疗效、术后并发症及免疫功能的影响比较

目的:探讨腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗胃癌的临床疗效、安全性及对患者免疫功能的影响。方法:选择2012年3月至2014年3月在我院行胃癌D2根治术的胃癌患者92例并随机分为两组,开腹组(A组)44例接受传统开腹手术,腹腔镜组(B组)48例接受腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术,观察和比较两组患者的手术情况以及手术前后患者免疫功能的变化,比较两组患者围术期不良反应的发生情况及临床疗效。结果:B组患者术中切口长度、出血量明显优于A组患者(P0.05),且B组患者较A组患者术后排气时间以及疼痛缓解情况明显较好(P0.05);两组患者接受手术前后,机体的免疫功能有所变化,B组患者术后24hCD3~+、CD4~+、CD8~+、CD4~+/CD8~+以及NK细胞相对活性等细胞免疫指标明显高于A组(P0.05),体液免疫指标IgM、IgG以及IgA等免疫球蛋白明显高于A组;两组患者术中并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义(P0.05),B组患者术后并发症的发生率与A组比较明显降低,且差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:腹腔镜辅助胃癌D2根治术对胃癌患者术中临床疗效有显著改善作用,可降低对机体免疫功能的影响并提高治疗的安全性。     

腹腔镜与传统开腹胃癌D2根治术式的临床分析

目的:比较远端胃癌应用腹腔镜辅助技术行D2根治术与传统开腹远端胃癌D2根治术安全性、近期生存差异。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月-2012年12月在我院行远端胃癌根治术的158例患者,其中行腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治手术75例(腹腔镜组),与开腹远端胃癌根治手术83例(开腹组)。对比分析腹腔镜组与开腹组病人术中情况和术后并发症及近期生存差异。结果:腹腔镜组与传统开腹组病人一般资料、病理学类型、肿瘤位置、肿瘤浸润深度、转移淋巴结数目、总清扫淋巴结数目、肿瘤TNM分期比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),腹腔镜组手术时间较传统开腹组长(P0.05),切口长度、离床活动时间、排气时间、进流食时间、总住院时间短于开腹组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05),腹腔镜组与开腹组术中出血量、术后并发症发生率、近期生存率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:腹腔镜辅助胃癌D2根治性手术安全可行,可达到开腹手术相同的根治效果,但较开腹组具有术中创伤小、术后恢复快优势。     

腹腔镜肝癌切除术与开放式肝癌切除术的疗效比较研究

目的：探讨腹腔镜肝癌切除手术治疗原发性肝癌的可行性及安全性。方法：选取2008年6月至2011年1月在我院行腹腔镜肝癌切除术的30例患者作为研究对象,另外选择同期在我院行开放式肝癌切除术的30例患者作为对照。结果：30例均在腹腔镜下成功地完成手术,其中22例行腹腔镜局部切除术,8例行肝左外叶切除术。手术时间103—142min,出血量60-480mL,术后均未发生严重并发症,术后平均住院8．6d。术后随访18～36个月,局部复发或种植性转移率与对照组无显著差异。结论：腹腔镜肝癌切除术是安全可行治疗原发性肝癌的手术方式.     

腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗胃癌患者的疗效及对免疫功能和炎性因子的影响

目的:探讨不同手术方式治疗胃癌患者的疗效及对免疫功能和炎性因子的影响。方法:选择2015年1月-2018年4月我院收治的择期行根治性切除术胃癌患者236例,根据不同的手术方式分为对照组(n=107)和实验组(n=129),对照组实施传统开腹胃癌根治术,实验组实施腹腔镜胃癌根治术。观察两组患者各项临床症状及并发症发生情况,比较两组患者术前、术后1 d、术后7 d免疫功能和炎性因子水平。结果:与对照组相比,实验组患者的手术时间明显升高,而其他临床症状指标以及并发症发生率显著下降(P0.05),两组淋巴结清除数目比较无统计学差异(P0.05)。两组患者术后1 d的IL-6、TNF-α、CRP水平均明显高于术前,但实验组低于对照组(P0.05)。术后7 d,对照组IL-6、TNF-α、CRP水平仍高于术前(P0.05),但实验组TNF-α、CRP水平与术前比较无统计学差异(P0.05),同时实验组IL-6、TNF-α、CRP水平均显著低于对照组(P0.05)。术后1 d、7 d,两组CD3~+、CD4~+、CD4~+/CD8~+均低于术前,CD8~+高于术前,且实验组CD3~+、CD4~+、CD4~+/CD8~+高于对照组,CD8~+低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:与传统开腹胃癌根治术比较,腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗胃癌患者疗效更好,可减轻炎性反应,对患者的免疫功能影响较小,安全可靠。     

腹腔镜与开腹手术对胃癌根治术患者TNF-alpha和IL-6 水平的影响研究

目的:探讨腹腔镜与开腹手术对胃癌根治术患者肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平的影响.方法:选取自2011年3月至2013年5月期间来我院就医并行胃癌根治术的72例胃癌患者作为研究对象.并将所有患者随机平均分成腹腔镜组和传统开腹组各36例.其中,腹腔镜组行腹腔镜辅助下胃癌根治术,传统开腹组行传统开腹胃癌根治术.比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间及住院时间;比较两组患者术前及术后血清TNF-α和IL-6水平.结果:腹腔镜组术中出血量、肛门排气时间及住院时间均明显低于对照组(P＜0.05)腹腔镜组术后TNF-α和IL-6水平明显低于开腹组(P＜0.05),两组比较有显著性差异(P＜0.05).结论:腹腔镜辅助下胃癌根治术较传统开腹胃癌根治术术后血清TNF-α和IL-6水平低,对机体免疫功能影响较小,可减少患者术后感染机会,值得在临床中推广应用.     

腹腔镜与开腹手术对胃癌根治术患者TNF-α和IL-6水平的影响研究

目的:探讨腹腔镜与开腹手术对胃癌根治术患者肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平的影响。方法:选取自2011年3月至2013年5月期间来我院就医并行胃癌根治术的72例胃癌患者作为研究对象。并将所有患者随机平均分成腹腔镜组和传统开腹组各36例。其中,腹腔镜组行腹腔镜辅助下胃癌根治术,传统开腹组行传统开腹胃癌根治术。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、肛门排气时间及住院时间;比较两组患者术前及术后血清TNF-α和IL-6水平。结果:腹腔镜组术中出血量、肛门排气时间及住院时间均明显低于对照组(P0.05)腹腔镜组术后TNF-α和IL-6水平明显低于开腹组(P0.05),两组比较有显著性差异(P0.05)。结论:腹腔镜辅助下胃癌根治术较传统开腹胃癌根治术术后血清TNF-α和IL-6水平低,对机体免疫功能影响较小,可减少患者术后感染机会,值得在临床中推广应用。     

经内镜鼻胆管引流术治疗腹腔镜胆囊切除术后迟发性胆漏

目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术后迟发性胆漏经内镜鼻胆管引流术治疗的可行性.方法:对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后7例明确病因的迟发性胆漏患者的临床资料进行回顾分析.结果:最初2例患者行开腹手术1例术中证实胆囊床迷走胆管漏,缝合漏口,腹腔冲洗引流,1例证实肝总管侧壁漏,行肝总管侧壁修补+T管引流术,另5例腹腔镜胆囊切除术后迟发性胆漏患者经内镜鼻胆管引流加腹腔引流治愈.随访1-13年疗效满意.结论:LC术后近期患者腹痛应考虑迟发性胆漏的可能,ERCP+ENBD是治疗腹腔镜胆囊切除术后迟发性胆漏的一种有效方法.     

腹腔镜胃癌根治术中转开腹的原因分析

目的:分析腹腔镜胃癌根治术中转开腹手术的原因。方法:回顾性分析2011年1月~2013年1月300例采用腹腔镜行胃癌根治手术患者的资料,总结分析其中11例行中转开腹手术的原因。结果:因腹腔内出血中转4例,腹内脏器损伤2例,腹腔严重粘连3例,气腹造成难以控制的高碳酸血症1例,器械损伤1例。结论:腹腔镜胃癌根治术具有创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短、患者易接受等优点,但也存在一定的中转开腹手术率,主要与患者原因、术者原因和器械原因有关。     

腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术中十二指肠优先离断对胃癌患者应激反应、炎性因子和生活质量的影响

摘要 目的：探讨腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术中十二指肠优先离断对胃癌患者应激反应、炎性因子和生活质量的影响。方法：回顾性选取2018年3月~2020年12月期间河北省邯郸市中心医院收治的行腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术的胃癌患者93例,根据患者手术方式的不同将患者分为对照组45例和研究组48例,对照组给予左侧后入路的腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术,研究组给予十二指肠优先离断腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术,比较两组围术期指标、应激反应、炎性因子、生活质量以及术后并发症情况。结果：两组清除淋巴结数量对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,研究组手术时间、胃肠道功能恢复时间、住院时间短于对照组,术中出血量少于对照组（P<0.05）。研究组术后3 d、术后5 d血糖、皮质醇、肾上腺素低于对照组（P<0.05）。研究组术后3 d、术后5 d白介素-6（IL-6）、C反应蛋白（CRP）、肿瘤坏死因子-?琢（TNF-?琢）低于对照组（P<0.05）。研究组术后1个月主观症状、生理功能状态、社会活动功能、心理情绪状态评分高于对照组（P<0.05）。两组术后并发症发生率对比无差异（P>0.05）。结论：与左侧后入路的腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术相比,十二指肠优先离断可简化腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术的手术步骤,减少胃癌患者术后应激反应和炎性反应,可有效促进患者术后恢复。     

近端胃切除与全胃切除在治疗近端胃癌中的疗效比较

目的:观察近端胃切除和全胃切除对近端胃癌的疗效。方法:比较28例患有早期近端胃癌接受近端胃切除28例患者与100例患有早期近端胃癌接受全胃切除的患者,观察近端胃切除是否优于全胃切除。结果:两种治疗方法手术时间、术后并发症(包括吻合口瘘)没有差异。两组患者胃切除后的代谢变化结果相似,体重,血清血红蛋白以及血清总蛋白浓度变化相近。近端胃切除后腹泻(32%)和胃食管返流(28%)最为常见,而全胃切除后餐后腹胀(21%)最为常见。二者的术后5年生存率没有明显差别。结论:近端胃切除不会由于残余胃的生理优势而优于全胃切除术。     

Surgical Outcomes of 2041 Consecutive Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Procedures for Gastric Cancer: A Large-Scale Case Control Study

BackgroundLaparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer has increased in popularity due to advances in surgical techniques. The aim of this study is to validate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with open gastrectomy (OG).MethodsThe study comprised 3,580 patients who were treated with curative intent either by laparoscopic gastrectomy (2,041 patients) or open gastrectomy (1,539 patents) between January 2005 and October 2013. The surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups.ResultsLaparoscopic gastrectomy was associated with significantly less blood loss, transfused patient number, time to ground activities, and post-operative hospital stay, but with similar operation time, time to first flatus, and time to resumption of diet, compared with the open gastrectomy. No significant difference in the number of lymph nodes dissected was observed between these two groups. The morbidity and mortality rates of the LG group were comparable to those of the OG group (13.6% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.526, and 0.3% vs. 0.2%, P = 0.740). The 3-year disease-free and overall survival rates between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). According to the UICC TNM classification of gastric cancer, the 3-year disease-free and overall survival rates were not statistically different at each stage.ConclusionsOur single-center study of a large patient series revealed that LG for gastric cancer yields comparable surgical outcomes. This result was also true of local advanced gastric cancer (AGC). A well-designed randomized controlled trial comparing surgical outcomes between LG and OG in a larger number of patients for AGC can be carried out.     

成份输血对胃癌术后血清IL-6、IL-10、COX-2、PGE_2含量的影响

目的：观察围手术期成份输血对胃癌患者炎症反应的影响。方法：随机选择胃癌病人分为3组：对照组,压积红细胞组,全血组。分别采用ELISA法和放免法检测患者术前及术后低1、3、7、14天血清中IL-6、IL-10、COX-2及PGE2含量。结果：手术后第一周是感染发生的主要时期,两周后,炎症反应基本消失,输血能升高患者血清中的促炎因子,降低抗炎因子IL-10的表达,但相对于输异体全血,输成份血能降低血清中COX-2、PGE2、IL-6的含量,升高血清IL-10的含量。结论：胃癌患者围手术期输血能促进机体的炎症反应,成份输血致炎效果弱于输异体全血。     

Incidence,Predictive Factors,and Clinical Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury after Gastric Surgery for Gastric Cancer

Background

Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), a serious surgical complication, is common after cardiac surgery; however, reports on AKI after noncardiac surgery are limited. We sought to determine the incidence and predictive factors of AKI after gastric surgery for gastric cancer and its effects on the clinical outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of 4718 patients with normal renal function who underwent partial or total gastrectomy for gastric cancer between June 2002 and December 2011. Postoperative AKI was defined by serum creatinine change, as per the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guideline.

Results

Of the 4718 patients, 679 (14.4%) developed AKI. Length of hospital stay, intensive care unit admission rates, and in-hospital mortality rate (3.5% versus 0.2%) were significantly higher in patients with AKI than in those without. AKI was also associated with requirement of renal replacement therapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that male gender; hypertension; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; hypoalbuminemia (<4 g/dl); use of diuretics, vasopressors, and contrast agents; and packed red blood cell transfusion were independent predictors for AKI after gastric surgery. Postoperative AKI and vasopressor use entailed a high risk of 3-month mortality after multiple adjustments.

Conclusions

AKI was common after gastric surgery for gastric cancer and associated with adverse outcomes. We identified several factors associated with postoperative AKI; recognition of these predictive factors may help reduce the incidence of AKI after gastric surgery. Furthermore, postoperative AKI in patients with gastric cancer is an important risk factor for short-term mortality.     

Altered expression profiles of clock genes hPer1 and hPer2 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of cancer patients undergoing surgery

Patients undergoing surgery often develop symptoms of circadian rhythm disorders such as insomnia or delirium. However, the effect of surgery on the biological clock remains unknown. The present study examines the expression of clock genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and measures plasma hormone concentrations in patients with esophageal cancer and early gastric cancer who underwent surgery. Six blood samples per day were collected from 9 patients with esophageal cancer before and after esophagectomy and from 9 patients with early gastric cancer before and after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG). The expression profiles of hPer1 and hPer2 mRNAs in PBMCs were determined by real-time RT-PCR. Plasma melatonin and cortisol concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. Plasma melatonin levels decreased in both groups throughout the day and plasma cortisol levels changed after surgery. The acrophase of clock gene expression was altered after surgery as follows: hPer1, from 6:19+/-1:50 to 13:59+/-0:59 (p=0.0003) and from 7:47+/-1:27 to 12:33+/-1:30 (p=0.0043) and hPer2, from 5:01+/-2:59 to 19:30+/-2:15 (p<0.0001) and from 6:49+/-1:59 to 13:39+/-3:06 (p=0.0171) in patients with esophageal and early gastric cancer, respectively. The post-operative phase change of hPer2 was more prominent after esophagectomy than after LADG. Our results suggest that surgical stress affects the peripheral clock as well as endogenous hormones in humans.     

胃肠减压对胃癌患者远端胃切除术围手术期效果的影响

目的:探讨胃癌患者远端胃大部切除术后放置鼻胃管引流的短期效果。方法:选取我科从2010年9月1日到2013年3月1日间318例胃癌行远端胃切除的患者,随机分为术后留置鼻胃管(NGT组)或不留置组(no NGT组),比较两组间围手术期的短期效果。结果:158例患者纳入NGT组,而160例患者纳入no NGT组。两组间在术后腹胀、持续呕吐、吻合口瘘、发热、肺部感染、伤口感染的发生率上无统计学差异(P0.05)。进一步分析65例既往有腹部手术史的患者(NGT组34例vs no NGT组31例),NGT组腹胀发生率(5.88%vs 29.03%,P0.05)显著低于no NGT组。结论:对于胃癌患者行远端胃切除术后不推荐放置鼻胃管;而对于既往有腹部手术史的患者,术后放置胃管可以降低腹胀的发生。     

胃癌患者术后并发症的危险因素分析

目的:探讨胃癌术后并发症的危险因素及其防治措施.方法:调查117例胃癌患者手术治疗前后的临床资料,并对术后发生并发症可能的危险因素进行评估、分析.结果:胃癌术后并发症包括切口感染、肺部感染或胸腔积液、腹腔感染、肠梗阻、吻合口瘘,发生率为35.04％(41/117),手术方式、手术时间、胃管留置时间、术后生活习惯与手术后并发症相关(P＜0.05).结论:胃癌术后并发症由多种原因综合引起,除患者素质和病变因素外,6个危险因素依次为:行全胃切除、D2清扫、手术时间＞4h、术中出血量≥800mL、胃管留置时间＞3d、长期吸烟,应重视其围手术期处理.     

Comparison of the Operative Outcomes and Learning Curves between Laparoscopic and Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Background

Minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy, has become more popular in the treatment of gastric cancer. However, few studies have compared the learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected between July 2008 and Aug 2014. A total of 145 patients underwent minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer by a single surgeon, including 73 laparoscopic and 72 robotic gastrectomies. The clinicopathologic characteristics, operative outcomes and learning curves were compared between the two groups.

Results

Compared with the laparoscopic group, the robotic group was associated with less blood loss and longer operative time. After the surgeon learning curves were overcome for each technique, the operative outcomes became similar between the two groups except longer operative time in the robotic group. After accumulating more cases of robotic gastrectomy, the operative time in the laparoscopic group decreased dramatically.

Conclusions

After overcoming the learning curves, the operative outcomes became similar between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. The experience of robotic gastrectomy could affect the learning process of laparoscopic gastrectomy.     

Endoscopic Resection Compared with Gastrectomy to Treat Early Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Endoscopic resection and gastrectomy are treatment modalities for early gastric cancer, but their relative benefits and risks are unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare endoscopic resection and gastrectomy for treating early gastric cancer.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until April 2015 for studies comparing endoscopic resection with gastrectomy for treatment of early gastric cancer. Outcome measures were five-year overall survival (OS), length of hospital stay and postoperative morbidity. We calculated pooled hazard ratio (HR), weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) using random effects models.

Results

Six studies comprising 1,466 patients (618 endoscopic resection and 848 gastrectomy) met inclusion criteria. Five-year OS was similar between endoscopic resection and gastrectomy (HR, 1.06; 95%CI: 0.61 to 1.83). Endoscopic resection was associated with shorter hospital stays (WMD, -6.94; 95%CI: -7.59 to -6.29) and reduced overall postoperative morbidity (OR, 0.36; 95%CI: 0.17 to 0.74).

Conclusions

While five-year OS is similar between endoscopic resection and gastrectomy, endoscopic resection offers a shorter hospital stay and fewer complications than gastrectomy for treating early gastric cancer. Endoscopic resection is a reasonable treatment for early gastric cancer with a negligible risk of lymph node metastasis.     

Cytokine response following transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer

Curative esophageal resection is usually performed using either a transthoracic (TT) or transhiatal (TH) approach. Forty patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent esophagectomies (24 TT and 16 TH), 12 patients who underwent surgery for gastric cancer, and 16 healthy individuals were enrolled in this study. Blood samples were taken from the patients, pre- and post-surgery. The levels of synthesis of T-helper 1 and 2 cytokines were assessed in vitro in the presence of mitogen. Our initial data indicated that at admission, 24 h before surgery, blood cells from both groups of esophageal cancer patients produced significantly lower levels of the Th1 cytokines, IFN-gamma and IL-2 than those from cells of healthy donors. Cells collected from gastric cancer patients prior to surgery produced intermediate levels of IFN-gamma and IL-2: significantly lower than healthy donors, and slightly more (non-significant) than esophageal cancer patients. These results contrast with those for the production of Th2 cytokines prior to surgery, which did not differ significantly between any groups: either the esophageal or gastric cancer patients, or healthy donors. Th1 and Th2 cytokine production was then studied using blood cells collected seven days after surgery. Cells from both groups of esophageal cancer patients, undergoing either TT or TH surgery, produced significantly lower levels of the Th1 cytokines, IFN-gamma and IL-2 than those from cells of gastric cancer patients who had undergone surgery. Postoperative and preoperative production was compared. For patients who had undergone TT esophageal resection, we observed that the post-operative production of IL-2, IL-5 and IL-13 was significantly lower than the pre-operative production of those cytokines. Such reduced post-operative compared to pre-operative production was only significant in patients who had undergone TT esophagectomy. A similar, but non-significant trend was observed in patients who had undergone either TH esophagectomy, or gastrectomy. The results indicate that digestive tract cancer patients, both esophageal and gastric, have (prior to surgery), a significantly reduced, basal, mitogen-induced production of Th1 but not of Th2 cytokine. Post-operatively, a significantly reduced production of Th1 and Th2 cytokines, except for IFN-gamma, was observed only in patients who had undergone surgical esophageal resection using the TT method.