糖尿病性视网膜病变术后CRT、SFCT、mALB、MBG、HbA1c水平的变化及相关性

本研究通过观察糖尿病性视网膜病变术后患者黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度,脉络膜厚度,尿微量白蛋白、血糖、糖化血红蛋白的水平,试图了解其差异及相关性。我们选取2016年1月至2017年12月于我院就诊的糖尿病性视网膜病变患者200例,根据其有无视网膜病变、有无肾病、术后有无黄斑水肿分为合并组和未合并组,同时选取100例正常成年人作为对照。观察糖尿病患者和对照组、未合并和合并并发症糖尿病患者的黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度(central retinal thickness, CRT),凹下脉络膜厚度(subfoveal choroidal thickness,SFCT),尿微量白蛋白(microAlbunminuria, mALB)、平均血糖(mean blood glucose, MBG)和糖化血红蛋白(glycated haemoglobin, HbA1c)水平,进一步分析了糖尿病黄斑水肿患者的尿微量白蛋白水平与黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度、脉络膜厚度、血糖、糖化血红蛋白的相关性。研究结果表明,糖尿病组患者的CRT水平较对照组低,SFCT、mALB、MBG和HbA1c水平高于对照组;合并视网膜病变、合并肾病和合并黄斑水肿组患者的CRT水平较未合并组低,SFCT、mALB、MBG和HbA1c水平均高于未合并组;黄斑水肿患者的m ALB水平与CRT水平负相关,与SFCT、MBG和HbA1c水平正相关。本研究得出结论:糖尿病性视网膜病变术后患者黄斑中心凹视网膜厚度(CRT)较薄,脉络膜厚度(SFCT)变厚,且与尿微量白蛋白密切相关。     

口服降糖药和胰岛素对不同临床分期糖尿病视网膜病变病情进程的影响

目的:探讨降糖药物和胰岛素控制血糖对不同临床分期糖尿病视网膜病变进程的影响。方法:收集糖尿病伴有视网膜病变的患者78例。采用随机表法,将糖尿病视网膜病变患者分为药物控制血糖组和胰岛素控制组,药物治疗组38例,胰岛素治疗组40例,使血糖达到控制标准。评价干预前后患者血清C肽、糖化血红蛋白、胰岛素抵抗指数,以及糖尿病视网膜病变分级。结果:药物控制组治疗前后2 h CP、以及糖化血红蛋白测定差异无统计学意义(p0.05)。胰岛素组治疗前后,血清空腹C肽、2 h CP差异有统计学意义(p0.05);而糖化血红蛋白、胰岛素抵抗指数差异无统计学意义(p0.05)。药物组治疗前Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期、Ⅴ期、Ⅵ期病例数和治疗后相比,差异有统计学意义(p0.05),视网膜病变分级程度明显增高。胰岛素组治疗前Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期、Ⅴ期、Ⅵ期病例数和治疗后相比,差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。药物组和胰岛素组间视网膜病变分级差异无统计学意义(p0.05);治疗后差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。结论:胰岛素能够提高糖尿病患者血清C肽,降低胰岛素抵抗,和药物控制血糖相比,能够延缓糖尿病视网膜病变的进展。     

糖化血红蛋白与糖尿病及其并发症的关系

目的:探讨糖化血红蛋白(HbAlc)与糖尿病诊断、疗效评价及并发症的关系。方法:选择2型糖尿病患者250例和健康体检者150例,分别测定空腹血糖(FPG)、2h血糖(2hPG)及糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),统计学分析HbA1c与FPG、2hPG的相关性;分析HbA1c与糖尿病并发症发生的关系。结果:糖尿病组FPG、2hPG及HbA1c水平均显著高于对照组(P<0.01);糖尿病伴有并发症患者的HbAlc明显高于无并发症者(P<0.05),HbA1c水平与糖尿病并发症的发生率存在高度相关性(P<0.01)。结论:检测外周血中HbA1c水平对2型糖尿病诊断、疗效评价具有重要临床价值,控制糖化血红蛋白对预防糖尿病并发症的发生具有重要意义。     

激光联合康柏西普治疗糖尿病视网膜病变伴黄斑水肿的临床效果及机制研究

目的:探讨激光联合康柏西普治疗糖尿病视网膜病变伴黄斑水肿的临床效果及可能机制。方法:选取2017年1月至2017年12月我院收治的糖尿病视网膜病变伴黄斑水肿患者92例作为研究对象,随机分为观察组46例(46眼)及对照组46例(46眼)。对照组患者实施激光治疗,观察组在注射康柏西普1周后再进行激光治疗。比较两组患者治疗后的临床疗效,治疗前后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑中心厚度(CMT)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、胰岛素样生长因子-1(IGF-1)及红细胞生成素(EPO)水平的变化。结果:治疗后,观察组的总有效率为91.30%,显著高于对照组(69.57%,P0.05);两组患者的BCVA均较治疗前明显提高(P0.05),CMT均低于治疗前(P0.05),但观察组BCVA较对照组更高(P0.05);CMT较对照组更低(P0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的VEGF、IGF-1、EPO均较治疗前明显降低,且观察组的VEGF、IGF-1、EPO均显著低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:激光联合康柏西普治疗糖尿病视网膜病变伴黄斑水肿的临床疗效显著优于单用激光治疗,并可有效改善VEGF、IGF-1、EPO水平,这可能对抑制血管新生产生积极作用。     

糖尿病白内障术后黄斑水肿与房水细胞因子的关系

为了探讨2型糖尿病白内障术后黄斑水肿与房水中细胞因子的关系,本研究选取2016年2月至2017年7月在我院治疗的2型糖尿病白内障患者117例117眼,均行超声乳化白内障摘除术,观察术后4周黄斑水肿发生情况以及房水中多种细胞因子水平。研究结果显示:术后4周,有37眼发生黄斑水肿(观察组),未发生黄斑水肿80眼(对照组);观察组术后4周黄斑区视网膜厚度为(247.28±18.37)μm,明显高于对照组(p<0.05),且明显高于术前水平(p<0.05);观察组术后4周干扰素诱导蛋白-10 (IP-10)、巨噬细胞趋化蛋白(MCP-1)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和细胞因子转化生长因子-β2 (TGF-β2)水平分别为(6.01±0.89) pg/mL、(340.03±45.39) pg/mL、(812.28±40.06) pg/mL和(40.05±10.03) pg/mL,明显高于对照组(p<0.05),且高于术前水平(p<0.05);观察组和对照组手术前后粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)和碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(b-FGF)比较差异无统计学意义(p>0.05);术后4周IP-10、MCP-1、VEGF和TGF-β2水平与黄斑区视网膜厚度呈正相关(r=0.452, 0.501, 0.466和0.470, p<0.05)。本研究的结果初步说明,房水中IP-10、MCP-1、VEGF和TGF-2水平与2型糖尿病白内障术后黄斑水肿有一定关系,有可能成为黄斑水肿的特异性评价指标,值得进一步研究。     

血清镁、血小板聚集率在糖耐量减低患者微血管病变中的临床意义

目的:观察糖耐量减低患者微血管病变与血清镁、血小板聚集率(PAR)的相关性。方法:将2012年11月-2014年1月在本院内分泌科和体检中心的120例研究对象随机均分为糖耐量减低合并微血管病变组(n=30),糖耐量减低无微血管病变组(n=30),糖尿病组(n=30),正常对照组(n=30)。比较各组患者的生化指标、血清镁与PAR的相关性、血镁水平以及PAR与FPG、HbA1C相关性。结果:糖尿病组和糖耐量减低合并微血管病变组患者的所有生化指标与对照组相比,差异有显著性(P0.05);血清镁水平与PAR之间呈显著负相关(P0.01);血镁水平与糖耐量减低合并微血管病变组、糖耐量减低无微血管病变组、糖尿病组中FPG、HbA1C呈负相关关系(P0.05);PAR与糖耐量减低合并微血管病变组、糖耐量减低无微血管病变组、糖尿病组中FPG、HbA1C呈正相关关系(P0.05)。结论:血清镁与PAR在预测糖耐量患者微血管病变中有一定的临床意义,值得临床推广。     

黄斑部视网膜前膜患者手术前后黄斑区结构变化及与视功能预后的关系

目的:探讨黄斑部视网膜前膜患者手术前后黄斑区域结构变化情况,及其与患者术后视功能的关系。方法:对2014年2月-2016年8月间在我院进行手术治疗的黄斑部视网膜前膜患者60例(60眼)的临床资料进行回顾性分析。所有患者均进行光学相干断层扫描(OCT)检查,观察黄斑中心凹及各方位视网膜厚度变化,同时记录患者手术前后最佳矫正视力(BCVA),分析其相关性。结果:术后53例(53眼)患者视力提高,占88.33%,7例(7眼)患者视力不变,占11.67%。术前患者BCVA为(0.18±0.07),术后3个月BCVA为(0.38±0.12),术后3个月BCVA较术前显著提高(P0.05)。患者术后黄斑中心凹厚度、内环颞侧厚度、内环鼻侧厚度、内环上方厚度、内环下方厚度、外环颞侧厚度、外环鼻侧厚度、外环上方厚度、外环下方厚度较术前均显著降低,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。经Pearson相关分析显示,患者术前黄斑中心凹厚度、内环颞侧厚度、外环颞侧厚度、术前后黄斑中心凹厚度差值、术前后内环颞侧厚度差值、术前后外环颞侧厚度差值与术后BCVA呈负相关(P0.05)。结论:玻璃体切除术可以显著降低黄斑部视网膜前膜患者黄斑区视网膜厚度,提高患者视功能,术前黄斑区域形态对患者术后视力恢复有一定影响。     

糖化血红蛋白在糖尿病中的应用价值分析

目的:研究糖化血红蛋白的检测在糖尿病患者中的诊断价值及对代谢指标的影响。方法:对126例临床确诊为糖尿痛患者进行糖化血红蛋白及空腹血糖检测,并且将糖化血红蛋白分为A组(HbA1c≤10%)和B组(HbA1c>10%),比较两组TG,TC,LDL.HD等指标。结果:FPG在B组患者的水平明显高于A组患者的水平,差异有显著的统计学意义(P<0.01),而2hPG,TC,LDL B组患者的水平明显高于A组患者的水平,差异有明显的统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:检测糖化血红蛋白在糖尿病患者具有重要的临床价值。     

2型糖尿病视网膜病变患者血清Chemerin、TNF-α及Cys C水平变化及其临床意义

目的:研究2型糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)患者血清趋化素(Chemerin)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)及胱抑素C(Cys C)的水平变化及临床意义。方法:以114例2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者为研究对象,分为非DR(NDR)组42例、非增生型DR(NPDR)组38例和增生型DR(PDR)组34例。另外选取38例健康体检者作为正常对照(NC)组。记录并比较四组的临床检查及生化指标及血清Chemerin、TNF-α和Cys C水平,并分析患者临床检查、生化指标与Chemerin、TNF-α、Cys C的相关性以及DR的危险因素。结果:NDR组、NPDR组、PDR组的体质量指数(BMI)、收缩压(SBP)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、空腹血糖(FPG)、胰岛素抵抗指数(HONA-IR)、甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、Chemerin、TNF-α、Cys C水平均高于NC组,且三组SBP、HbA1c、FPG、HONA-IR、血清Chemerin、TNF-α和Cys C水平逐渐递增(P0.05)。Pearson相关性分析结果显示,血清Chemerin、TNF-α、Cys C与SBP、HbA1c、FPG、HONA-IR、TG、TC、LDL-C均呈正相关关系(P0.05),且Chemerin、Cys C、TNF-α三者亦呈正相关关系(P0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,HONA-IR、HbA1c、Chemerin、Cys C和TNF-α均为DR的独立危险因素。结论:高水平Chemerin、TNF-α和Cys C可能与DR的发生、发展有关,三者互相促进,均为DR发生发展的独立危险因素,可用于DR患者的早期诊断及其病情严重程度的判断。     

高度近视眼黄斑区不同区域视网膜神经上皮层厚度与屈光度的关系

目的:研究高度近视眼黄斑区神经上皮层厚度的变化,并分析其与屈光度的相关性。方法:选取高度近视患眼107例,按屈光度不同分为Ⅰ组(-6 D至-8 D)、Ⅱ组(-8.25 D至-10.D)、Ⅲ组(-10 D)。采用光学相干断层扫描(optical coherence tomography,OCT)测量黄斑部9个不同分区的视网膜神经上皮层厚度,即直径1 mm(黄斑中心凹区)、1-3 mm(内环区:B1、B2、B3、B4)和3-6mm(外环区:C1、C2、C3、C4),比较期间的差别,并分析各区域神经上皮层厚度与屈光度之间的相关性。结果:Ⅰ组与Ⅱ组及Ⅲ组、Ⅱ组与Ⅲ组黄斑中心凹区神经上皮层厚度比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),Ⅲ组与Ⅰ组及Ⅱ组外环区神经上皮层比较差异具有统计学意义(P0.05),Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ组内环区神经上皮层厚度比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);黄斑中心凹及外环区视网膜神经上皮层厚度与近视屈光度呈显著负相关(r分别为-0.233、0.248、0.278、0.383、0.336),差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:高度近视眼黄斑部视网膜神经上皮层厚度随近视屈光度的增高而呈区域选择性萎缩变薄。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor