Switching to Denosumab or Bisphosphonates After Completion of Teriparatide Treatment in Women With Severe Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

ObjectiveTo compare bone mineral density (BMD) changes after 12 months of treatment with denosumab or bisphosphonates in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis after stopping teriparatide therapy.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 140 postmenopausal women (mean age, 74.2 years) with severe osteoporosis who had been treated with teriparatide for 18 to 24 months at our outpatient clinic in a tertiary endocrine center between 2006 and 2015. After stopping teriparatide therapy, they continued treatment with a bisphosphonate (alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, or zoledronic acid) or denosumab while receiving daily vitamin D and calcium. BMD at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), and femoral neck (FN) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry when teriparatide therapy was discontinued (baseline) and after 12 months of further treatment. Multivariate linear regression models were used to identify the predictors of BMD gain.ResultsAfter stopping teriparatide therapy, 70 women continued treatment with bisphosphonates and 70 received denosumab. LS, but not TH or FN, BMD gain was significantly greater in the denosumab group than in the bisphosphonates group at 12 months. Multivariate analysis showed that BMD gain at the LS was negatively associated with bisphosphonate versus denosumab treatment and positively associated with baseline serum total procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide. BMD gains at the FN were predicted by higher baseline serum urate levels. BMD gains at the TH and FN were negatively associated with pretreatment BMD gains at the same site.ConclusionTwelve months after stopping teriparatide therapy, sequential denosumab treatment appeared to yield higher additional LS BMD gain on average compared with bisphosphonates treatment.     

Orbital Inflammatory Disease in A Patient Treated with Zoledronate

ObjectiveTo increase awareness of orbital inflammatory disease as a rare adverse effect of bisphosphonates.MethodsWe present a case report and a review of the relevant literature.ResultsA 57-year-old woman with history of esophageal, breast, and lung cancers was diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis. She initially received intravenous ibandronate for a total of 6 infusions. Later, she was changed to zoledronate infusion because of its yearly dosing schedule. Several hours after her initial infusion of zoledronate, she developed a painfully swollen left eye with photophobia. Ophthalmologic exam showed edema of the left upper lid. No exophthalmos was noted. Slitlamp exam showed conjunctival injection in the left eye with an elevated intraocular pressure. An orbital computed tomographic scan showed inflammation of the left orbital, preseptal, and retroseptal spaces. She was started on 2 methylprednisolone dose packs and the swelling and erythema disappeared completely in 2 weeks. Subsequent orbital magnetic resonance imaging showed no mass within either the left or right orbit, and no abnormal enhancement following contrast administration.ConclusionPhysicians should be aware of this rare complication of zoledronate. It should be used with caution in patients with a history of inflammatory eye disease or mild ocular symptoms following use of a bisphosphonate. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:e101-e103)     

Raloxifene: results from the MORE study

Raloxifene is the first Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator (SERM) approved for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Acting as an estrogen agonist in the skeleton and on lipid metabolism, raloxifene maintains bone mineral density (BMD) and prevents new vertebral fractures while improving the lipid profile in postmenopausal women. In an osteoporosis prevention study, 601 women without osteoporosis, aged 45 to 60 years, were assigned to receive a placebo or raloxifene 30, 60, or 150 mg/day. All women received calcium (400 to 600 mg/day). Raloxifene 60 mg increased BMD by 2.4% at both the lumbar spine and hip compared with the placebo at 36 months. More importantly, however, raloxifene significantly reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures in Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE), a placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized trial of 7705 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The women, with a mean age of 66.5 years, and with hip or spine T-score <-2.5 and/or prevalent vertebral fractures, were assigned to receive either a placebo or 60 mg or 120 mg of raloxifene. All women were provided supplemental calcium (500 mg/day) and vitamin D (400 IU/day). After 36 months, raloxifene 60 mg/day and 120 mg/day, reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures by 55% (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.3, 0.7; p<0.001), and 40% (RR 0.60, CI 0.4, 0.9) in women without prevalent baseline fractures, respectively; and by 31% (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.6, 0.9; p<0.001), and 49% (RR 0.5, CI 0.4, 0.6) in women with prevalent baseline fractures compared with the placebo. There was no difference in the proportion of women reporting non-traumatic, non - spine fractures among women receiving raloxifene compared to the placebo-treated women. Compared with placebo, BMD increased after 36 months by 2.1 and 2.6% at the femoral neck and spine, respectively, in the 60mg raloxifene group, and by 2.4 and 2.7% at the femoral neck and spine, respectively, in the 120mg raloxifene group. By 40 months of follow-up, there was a higher rate of deep venous thrombosis (38 cases) and pulmonary embolus (17 cases) in the combined raloxifene groups than in the placebo group (5 and 3 cases,), with a relative risk of 3.1, (CI 1.5-6.2). By 40 months, 54 women had a confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer with a relative risk compared to placebo of 0.35, (CI, 0.21-0.58). Raloxifene therapy for 3 years maintains BMD in healthy postmenopausal women and significantly reduces the risk of new vertebral fractures by about half in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Raloxifene also reduces the risk of breast cancer by 65% in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis thus providing a new choice for addressing postmenopausal health concerns.     

Meta-Analysis of Clinical Fracture Risk Reduction of Antiosteoporosis Drugs: Direct and Indirect Comparisons and Meta-Regressions

ObjectiveAntiosteoporotic drug (AOD) trials have variabilities in duration and fracture risks. This study evaluated AOD’s versus controls regarding reduction in relative rates and rate differences in vertebral and hip fractures and comparative costs.MethodsPrimary randomized controlled trials of antiosteoporotic drugs in postmenopausal women with documentation of vertebral fracture rates or hip fracture rates were extracted from meta-analyses and PubMed through February 2021. Direct and indirect meta-analyses and meta-regressions analyzed the fracture reductions.ResultsThere were 24 randomized controlled trials of drug versus placebo (73 862 women) and 10 randomized controlled trials of drug versus drug. The reductions in the relative rates of vertebral fractures were significant for antiresorptive (alendronate, risedronate, zoledronate, denosumab, and raloxifene) and anabolic (teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab) drugs. Denosumab, teriparatide, and abaloparatide were more effective in reducing vertebral fracture rates than oral bisphosphates (all P < .05) but were not more effective in reducing vertebral fracture rates than zoledronate. The reductions in hip fracture rates were significant for alendronate, denosumab, and zoledronate (all P < .05), without significant differences among drugs. Anabolic drugs did not show significant hip fracture rate reduction. Meta-regression of rate differences enabled the calculation of costs per vertebral fracture prevented, which were estimated at >$100 000 for anabolic drugs and between $2289 and $28 947 for antiresorptive drugs. Many direct drug versus drug trials were underpowered to demonstrate benefits of one drug over another.ConclusionThis study suggests goal-directed, cost-effective therapies relative to patient risk for vertebral and hip fractures. Anabolic drugs are better at preventing vertebral fractures than oral bisphosphonates. Anabolic drugs are not superior to zoledronate or denosumab and are substantially more expensive. When comparing drugs that prevented hip fractures, there was no statistical benefit of any drug.     

Use of Oral Bisphosphonates in Primary Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Oral bisphosphonates are first-line drugs in the treatment of osteoporosis under most guidelines, and have been shown to decrease risk of first fracture only in asymptomatic vertebral fractures and in clinical trial populations that are generally very different from the general population.

Objective

To compare incidence of first osteoporotic fracture in two cohorts of postmenopausal women, one treated with bisphosphonates and the other only with calcium and vitamin D.

Design

Retrospective population cohort study with paired matching based on data from electronic health records.

Setting

Women aged 60 years and older in 2005, from 21 primary care centers in a healthcare region of Spain.

Participants

Two groups of women aged 60 years and older (n = 1208), prescribed either calcium and vitamin D (CalVitD) or bisphosphonates (BIPHOS) with or without calcium and vitamin D, were compared for the end point of first recorded osteoporotic-related fracture, with 5-years follow-up.

Main Outcome Measure

Incidence of first fracture: Vertebral fracture, osteoporosis with pathological fracture, fracture of the upper humeral epiphysis, fracture of the lower radial epiphysis, or femur fracture.

Results

Estimated 10-year risk of fracture was 11.4% (95% confidence interval: 9.6 to 13.2), 11.8% (9.2 to 14.3) in the BIPHOS group and 11.1% (8.6 to 13.6) in the CalVitD group. No significant differences were found between groups in total fractures (Hazard ratio = 0.934 (0.67 to 1.31)) or location (vertebral, femoral, radial or humeral).

Conclusions

In postmenopausal women, bisphosphonates have not been shown to better decrease risk of first fracture compared with calcium and vitamin D therapy alone.     

Osteoporosis Treatment After Osteoporotic Fractures: Data From a Single Medical Center

ObjectiveMost patients do not receive osteoporosis treatment after osteoporotic fracture. This study reviewed osteoporosis treatment after osteoporotic fractures in a center without a Fracture Liaison Service.MethodsWe identified all patients with hip, vertebral, humeral or radial fractures, evaluated in Meir Medical Center, in 2017. The exclusion criteria were not a Clalit Health Services member, high-energy fracture or 30-day postoperative mortality. The primary endpoint was osteoporosis drugs issued within 12 months of fracture. Secondary endpoints included bone densitometry and 1-year mortality.ResultsFive-hundred-eighty-two patients (average age 78.6 ± 11.1 years, 75.8% women) were included. There were 321 (55.5%) hip, 84 (14.1%) humeral, 33 (5.6%) vertebral, and 144 (24.7%) radial fractures. Osteoporosis drugs were issued to 26.5% of the patients; those with humeral fractures received the least (21.4%) and vertebral, the most (30.3%; P = .51). Bone densitometry was performed in 23.2% of patients. One-year mortality after hip fracture was 12.1%, followed by humeral (3.6%; P < .05). Logistic regression showed that previous treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 7.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6–15.2), bone densitometry (OR = 4.4; 95% CI 2.6–7.4) and endocrinology visit (OR = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4–4.6) were the most important factors associated with treatment.ConclusionFewer than one third of patients received pharmacotherapy within 1 year after fracture. Because pharmacotherapy reduces future fractures and mortality, we recommend that medical staff who care for patients with fracture adopt practical and effective strategies to increase treatment rates among patients with osteoporotic fractures.     

PKP治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的预后评价及继发危险因素分析

目的:分析椎弓根入路行椎体后凸成形术(PKP)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的预后评价及继发危险因素分析。方法:选择2016年2月-2018年2月我院收治的骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者85例纳入本次研究,采用随机数表法分为观察组(n=43)和对照组(n=42)。对照组使用经皮椎体成形术进行治疗,观察组采用PKP进行治疗。比较两组患者手术情况、术后情况、椎体前缘高度丢失率、Cobb角、继发性骨折发生情况及分析骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者术后继发骨折的危险因素。结果:观察组手术时间、透视次数、骨水泥注入量、术中出血量均显著低于对照组,差异显著(P0.05);观察组疼痛缓解时间、下地时间及住院时间均显著低于对照组,差异显著(P0.05);治疗前,两组椎体前缘高度丢失率、Cobb角比较,无显著差异;治疗后,两组患者的椎体高度丢失率明显下降,但两组术后7 d、术后6月两组椎体前缘高度丢失率、Cobb角比较无显著差异;观察组术后12月椎体前缘高度丢失率、Cobb角低于对照组,差异显著(P0.05);所有患者均随访12月,其中22例(25.88%)发生继发性椎体骨折,进行单因素分析,结果发现,两组患者性别、骨折部位、局部矢状面后凸角度、骨水泥量、椎体高度恢复、术后抗骨质疏松治疗差异无统计学意义(P0.05);骨质疏松原因、骨水泥椎间隙渗漏、术后支具佩戴、原发骨折类型与骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者术后发生继发骨折相关(P0.05)。多因素Logistic分析显示,骨质疏松原因、骨水泥椎间隙渗漏、术后支具佩戴、原发骨折类型均是骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者术后发生继发骨折的独立危险因素(P0.05)。结论:在骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者中应用PKP可有效改善手术情况,随着时间的延长,PKP更有利于维持患者椎体高度;骨质疏松原因、骨水泥椎间隙渗漏、术后支具佩戴、原发骨折类型是骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者术后发生继发骨折的危险因素,临床上对于具有危险因素的患者引起重视,并采取干预措施。     

Reversal of postmenopausal vertebral bone loss by oestrogen and progestogen: a double blind placebo controlled study

Because of uncertainty about the place of hormones in the treatment of postmenopausal bone loss vertebral and forearm bone loss was measured by absorptiometry in early post-menopausal women before and after continuous or sequential treatment with combined oestrogen and progestogen in a double blind placebo controlled trial. Treatment with hormones significantly reversed the vertebral bone loss. The net gain in vertebral bone density amounted to 6·4% a year with continuous supplementation and 5·4% a year with sequential supplementation; the net gain in forearm bone density was lower (3·6% with continuous and 3·7% with sequential supplementation).Before a policy of supplementation with hormones can be recommended to all postmenopausal women with the aim of reducing the incidence of vertebral crush fractures further studies with different doses and combinations of hormones, administered over several years, are needed.     

Effect of Vitamin D Therapy on Bone Turnover Markers in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis and Osteopenia

ObjectiveTo (7) assess the rate of reduction in bone turnover with vitamin D and bisphosphonate therapies and (2) evaluate the clinical utility of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) in monitoring treatment response.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with newly diagnosed osteopenia and osteoporosis from 2002 to 2009 at Loyola University Medical Center. A cohort of postmenopausal women with hip or spine T-scores of less than -1, normal serum creatinine, and no prior vitamin D or bisphosphonate therapy was divided into vitamin D-deficient (n = 29) and vitamin D-sufficient (n = 13) groups. Vitamin D-deficient patients received high-dose vitamin D, whereas vitamin D-sufficient patients received orally administered bisphosphonates. BSAP levels at baseline and 1 year were compared.Resultsvitamin D therapy in the group with vitamin D deficiency led to a 26.7% decrease in BSAP (P < .01). Bisphosphonate therapy in the vitamin D-sufficient group led to a 32.7% decrease in BSAP (P = .01). The magnitude of BSAP change in the 2 study groups (6.74 ± 6.48 μg ∕ L and 8.72 ± 9.94 μgZL) did not differ significantly (P = .45).ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that correction of vitamin D deficiency in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis can lead to a decrease in bone turnover as measured by BSAP and that the magnitude of this reduction is similar to that achieved with orally administered bisphosphonates. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:873-879)     

The role of i.v. ibandronate administration in osteoporosis therapy

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease of the osseous system characterised by decreased strength of bone tissue, which in turn leads to increased fracture risk. It has been demonstrated that osteoporosis affects more than 30% of women after the menopause (WHO, 1994). However, the disease is also observed in men. The primary goals of osteoporosis therapy include prevention of low-energy fractures and general improvement of quality of life. Any patient with diagnosed osteoporosis requires, besides prevention, the application of proper treatment. Of the available therapeutic options, the best are bisphosphonates, medical agents with well identified properties, therapeutic efficacy, and safety which has been confirmed in many clinical studies. Therefore, they are recommended as first line drugs for osteoporosis. The efficacy of oral preparations may be limited, due to low bioavailability, complications and adverse effects from the gastrointestinal tract. So the parenteral administration of bisphosphonates is a valuable alternative. A fine example of such therapy is the intravenous administration of ibandronate. Short injection time periods and the relatively long, three-month intervals between administrations are unquestionable advantages of this therapy mode. In addition, the therapy does not constrain a patient's everyday activity, and simultaneously provides regular contact with doctors and the therapeutic centre. Additionally, a good tolerance of the drug and its high therapeutic efficacy, proven by appreciably reduced fracture risks, significantly improves the quality of life of patients suffering from osteoporosis. This paper is a thorough review of current knowledge on the efficacy and safety of i.v. ibandronate in osteoporosis therapy, as presented in the latest literature reports.     

Patterns of Osteoporosis Medications Selection After Drug Holiday or Continued Therapy: A Real-World Experience

ObjectivePublished literature on physicians’ preferences and sequential treatment patterns of osteoporosis therapy is scarce.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of patients who received bisphosphonates, denosumab, and/or raloxifene for at least 3 consecutive years or teriparatide for at least 18 months for osteoporosis. Data collection spanned 10 years, from October 2007 to September 2016, at a tertiary care center in the United States.ResultsIn total, 12 885 patients were identified on the basis of receiving at least 1 treatment at any point in time; 1814 patients were randomly reviewed, and 274 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 68.8 ± 10.7 years, and women represented 90.9% of all the cases. Primary care physicians and rheumatologists constituted 65.7% and 22.6% of the prescribers, respectively. Before instituting a drug holiday, alendronate was the most common initial treatment (percentage, mean duration ± standard deviation in years: 69%, 5.4 ± 2.4 years) followed by ibandronate (9.5%, 4.9 ± 2.1 years) and raloxifene (9.1%, 5.2 ± 1.6 years). Denosumab was the most common second course of treatment, accounting for 29.3% of 82 patients who were subsequently prescribed another therapy, followed by alendronate (24.4%) and zoledronate (20.7%). Among patients who were placed on a drug holiday and eventually restarted on osteoporosis therapy, denosumab was the most common treatment instituted (n = 21), accounting for 40% of the total patients, followed by alendronate (32%) and zoledronate (16%). There was a progressive decline in osteoporosis therapy over the duration of the study.ConclusionAlendronate was the most common initial therapy. Denosumab was the most common second course of treatment prescribed.     

Anabolic Therapy and Optimal Treatment Sequences for Patients With Osteoporosis at High Risk for Fracture

Objective: Provide an update regarding anabolic medications for osteoporosis, which are often considered to be the last resort for patients with osteoporosis, after multiple fractures have already occurred and other medications have already been administered.Methods: Literature review and discussion.Results: Recent pivotal trial data for anabolic agents and randomized trials comparing anabolic and antiresorptive medications suggest that three anabolic agents (teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab) reduce nonvertebral and vertebral fractures faster and to a greater extent than potent antiresorptive treatments. Furthermore, bone density accrual is maximized when patients are given anabolic agents first, followed by potent antiresorptive therapy. Since total hip bone density during or after osteoporosis treatment has emerged as an excellent surrogate for future fracture risk, attaining a greater hip bone mineral density is a treatment goal for high-risk osteoporosis patients.Conclusion: This review defines the highest-risk patients and summarizes the rationale for the evolving role of anabolic therapy in the management of postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture.Abbreviations: ACTIVE = Abaloparatide Comparator Trial in Vertebral Endpoints; ARCH = Active Controlled Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis at High Risk; BMD = bone mineral density; FRAME = Fracture Study in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis; FRAX = Fracture Risk Assessment Tool; PTH = parathyroid hormone; TBS = trabecular bone score     

Calcitonin: A useful old friend

Calcitonin regulates blood calcium levels and possesses certain clinically useful anti-fracture properties. Specifically, it reduces vertebral fractures in postmenopausal osteoporotic women significantly compared to a placebo. Nevertheless, the use of calcitonin has declined over the years and salmon calcitonin is no longer the first-line treatment for many of its indications. Commercial calcitonin only exists in intranasal or injectable preparations, which are less preferable for patients. Efficacy of a potential oral formulation has been under investigation but achieving adequate bioavailability remains a conundrum and the latest phase III trials have not shown promising evidence justifying its use. Associations with cancer have also derailed this treatment option. Furthermore, the rise of bisphosphonates and, more recently, monoclonal antibodies (such as denosumab), has revolutionised the treatment of osteoporotic fractures. Therefore, we are posed with an interesting question: is calcitonin a treatment of the past? This review aims to explore the reasons behind this paradigm shift and outline the potential role of calcitonin in the management of fractures and other conditions in the years to come.     

The effect of dehydroepiandrosterone administration on intestinal calcium absorption in ovariectomized female rats

[Purpose] Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) administration reportedly recovers osteoporosis, a bone disorder associated with bone deficiency in postmenopausal women. However, the physiological mechanism of DHEA in osteoporosis remains elusive, especially in terms of intestinal calcium absorption. Therefore, we investigated the effect of DHEA administration on calcium absorption in ovariectomized (OVX) female rats using an estrogen receptor antagonist.[Methods] Female Sprague-Dawley rats (n=23, 6 weeks old) were randomized into three groups: OVX control group (OC, n=7), OVX with DHEA treatment group (OD, n=8), and OVX with DHEA inhibitor group (ODI, n=8) for 8 weeks.[Results] Intestinal calcium accumulation, as well as the rate of absorption, demonstrated no significant differences during the experimental period among investigated groups. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the tibia at the proximal metaphysis was higher in the OD group than that in the OC group (p<0.05); however, BMD of the ODI group showed no significant difference from investigated groups. Furthermore, the BMD of the tibia at the diaphysis did not significantly differ among these groups.[Conclusion] We revealed that DHEA administration does not involve intestinal Ca absorption, although this treatment improves BMD levels in OVX rats. These observations indicate that the effect of DHEA on the bone in postmenopausal women is solely due to its influence on bone metabolism and not intestinal calcium absorption.     

Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveThe management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often requires combinations of antihyperglycemic medications with complementary mechanisms of action. Inadequate adherence to combination therapy, possibly related to pill burden (greater number of pills and higher administration frequency) and poor tolerability, may lead to suboptimal clinical outcomes. One potential means of addressing these problems is the use of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) that simplify the treatment regimen by reducing pill burden compared with the same combination delivered as separate pills. The present study evaluates the efficacy and tolerability of FDCs in the treatment of T2DM patients and provides an overview of dosing, costs, and adherence.MethodsA review of FDCs, with particular attention to those that contain metformin extended-release (XR) and allow once-daily dosing.ResultsMany FDCs contain metformin as one of the component drugs. However, the standard immediate-release (IR) formulation of metformin requires twice-daily dosing and may have tolerability problems related to adverse gastrointestinal (GI) effects. The XR formulationsof metformin can be administered once daily and have been shown to reduce the occurrence of GI effects frequently observed with metformin IR; consequently, they may have significant advantages for inclusion in FDCs. The long-term cost-effectiveness of FDCs remains to be fully determined.ConclusionFor patients taking metformin, FDCs containing metformin XR offer equivalent efficacy with reduced dose frequency and, potentially, fewer GI events compared with standard IR formulation, as well as a reduced number of pills compared with separate-pill regimens. By reducing pill burden and improving tolerability, FDCs may improve adherence. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20: 1322-1332)     

Bisphosphonates and Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study

ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy and in those who were bisphosphonate naïve.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective review of medical records of patients at the New York Harbor Health Care System from 1999 through 2004. Charts were selected for review if patients had a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code suggestive of ONJ or if they had ever received bisphosphonate therapy.ResultsAmong 1,951 medical records reviewed, we identified 2 patients with ONJ who had received bisphos-phonates and 2 patients with ONJ who were bisphospho-nate naïve. Both patients treated with bisphosphonates had multiple myeloma and were receiving monthly infusions. They had initially received pamidronate before treatment was changed to zoledronic acid. In each case, ONJ was precipitated by a routine dental extraction. The prevalence of ONJ in our patient population receiving intravenously administered bisphosphonates was 1 in 71.5. Of the 2 cases of ONJ in bisphosphonate-naïve patients, osteora-dionecrosis was clearly incriminated in 1 patient and potentially the causative factor in the other patient as well. No patients receiving orally administered bisphosphonates had ONJ, nor did this complication occur in any patients receiving parenteral bisphosphonate therapy for disorders such as osteoporosis or Paget’s disease of bone.ConclusionBisphosphonates remain an important option for management of metabolic bone disease and complications of malignant disease. The overall prevalence of ONJ in patients receiving bisphosphonates seems to be very low; however, patients receiving intense parenteral therapy for an underlying malignant condition appear to have a uniquely elevated risk for the development of this complication. A causal relationship between bisphosphonates and ONJ remains to be proved and merits further investigation. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:232-238)     

Iatrogenic Osteoporosis,Bilateral Hip Osteonecrosis,and Secondary Adrenal Suppression in an Hiv-Infected Man Receiving Inhaled Corticosteroids and Ritonavir-Boosted Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

ObjectiveTo report the first case of severe osteoporosis associated with a vertebral pathologic fracture and osteonecrosis of femoral heads in an HIV-infected man receiving inhaled corticosteroids and ritonavir-boosted antiretroviral therapy.MethodsWe describe an HIV-infected man with severe osteoporosis, bilateral hip osteonecrosis, and secondary adrenal suppression, including detailed clinical, laboratory, and radiographic data, and review the related literature.ResultsA 60-year-old man with a 15-year history of HIV infection and a medical history of long-standing bronchiectasis treated with inhaled corticosteroids and hypogonadism treated with testosterone was referred to the endocrinology clinic after experiencing an osteoporotic vertebral fracture. He was taking ritonavir-boosted antiretroviral therapy. Osteonecrosis of both hips was also diagnosed, which required total hip replacement therapy.Laboratory evaluation revealed adrenal insufficiency due to increased effect of exogenous inhaled steroids and no other secondary causes of osteoporosis. A bone densitometry study showed osteoporosis of both hips and the lumbar spine. He was treated with intravenous pamidronate. During treatment, he developed bilateral femoral fractures after minor trauma.ConclusionsGiven the potential for increased serum levels of inhaled corticosteroids in patients taking ritonavirboosted highly active antiretroviral therapy, attention must be paid to the risk of bone loss in HIV-infected patients taking inhaled corticosteroids. Prescribing calcium and vitamin D supplementation and considering early osteoporosis screening are reasonable measures for this patient population. Interaction between inhaled corticosteroids and ritonavir may increase risk of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:74-78)     

Bone Mineral Density,Bone Turnover Markers and Fractures in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A Case Control Study

Objective

The aim of our study was to elucidate the pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis-related osteoporosis and the prevalence of vertebral fragility fracture in postmenopausal women with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Methodology

Fifty-four postmenopausal women with scleroderma and 54 postmenopausal controls matched for age, BMI, and smoking habits were studied. BMD was measured by dual energy-x-ray absorptiometry at spine and femur, and by ultrasonography at calcaneus The markers of bone turnover included serum osteocalcin and urinary deoxypyridinoline. All subjects had a spine X-ray to ascertain the presence of vertebral fractures.

Results

bone mineral density at lumbar spine (BMD 0.78±0.08 vs 0.88±0.07; p<0,001), femoral neck (BMD: 0.56±0.04 vs 0.72±0.07; p<0,001) and total femur (BMD: 0.57±0.04 vs 0.71±0.06; p<0,001) and ultrasound parameter at calcaneus (SI: 80.10±5.10 vs 94.80±6.10 p<0,001) were significantly lower in scleroderma compared with controls; bone turnover markers and parathyroid hormone level were significantly higher in scleroderma compared with controls, while serum of 25(OH)D3 was significantly lower. In scleroderma group the serum levels of 25(OH)D3 significantly correlated with PTH levels, BMD, stiffness index and bone turnover markers. One or more moderate or severe vertebral fractures were found in 13 patients with scleroderma, wherease in control group only one patient had a mild vertebral fracture.

Conclusion

Our data shows, for the first time, that vertebral fractures are frequent in subjects with scleroderma, and suggest that lower levels of 25(OH)D3 may play a role in the risk of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures.     

经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床疗效及术后邻近椎体骨折的危险因素分析

摘要 目的：观察骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折（OVCFs）患者以经皮椎体成形术（PVP）治疗后的临床疗效,并分析术后邻近椎体骨折的危险因素。方法：选取我院2018年6月~2020年9月期间收治的OVCFs患者180例,给予PVP治疗,观察其治疗效果、骨水泥渗漏情况、术后邻近椎体骨折发生情况,采用单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析术后邻近椎体骨折的危险因素。结果：OVCFs患者术前~术后6个月功能障碍指数（ODI）、疼痛视觉模拟评分（VAS）、活动能力评分（LAS）均呈降低趋势（P＜0.05）。随访期间,180例患者中,15例（8.33%）出现了骨水泥渗漏,但均不需要进一步处理。32例（17.78%）出现了术后邻近椎体骨折,148例未出现术后邻近椎体骨折,并以此进行分组。再骨折组、未再骨折组在年龄、骨折病史、骨密度、Cobb角、椎体高度恢复、骨水泥渗漏情况、使用抗骨质疏松药物方面对比有明显差异（P<0.05）。年龄>70岁、骨水泥渗漏、骨密度<-2.5SD、未使用抗骨质疏松药物、Cobb角<15°、椎体高度恢复率>87%均是PVP术后邻近椎体骨折的危险因素（P<0.05）。结论：PVP治疗OVCFs疗效较好,可缓解患者疼痛、减轻功能障碍、改善活动能力,术后邻近椎体骨折的发生受年龄、骨密度、Cobb角等多种因素影响,临床可针对这些因素给予对应的干预措施。