The anticodon and the D-domain sequences are essential determinants for plant cytosolic tRNA(Val) import into mitochondria

In higher plants, one-third to one-half of the mitochondrial tRNAs are encoded in the nucleus and are imported into mitochondria. This process appears to be highly specific for some tRNAs, but the factors that interact with tRNAs before and/or during import, as well as the signals present on the tRNAs, still need to be identified. The rare experiments performed so far suggest that, besides the probable implication of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, at least one additional import factor and/or structural features shared by imported tRNAs must be involved in plant mitochondrial tRNA import. To look for determinants that direct tRNA import into higher plant mitochondria, we have transformed BY2 tobacco cells with Arabidopsis thaliana cytosolic tRNA(Val)(AAC) carrying various mutations. The nucleotide replacements introduced in this naturally imported tRNA correspond to the anticodon and/or D-domain of the non-imported cytosolic tRNA(Met-e). Unlike the wild-type tRNA(Val)(AAC), a mutant tRNA(Val) carrying a methionine CAU anticodon that switches the aminoacylation of this tRNA from valine to methionine is not present in the mitochondrial fraction. Furthermore, mutant tRNAs(Val) carrying the D-domain of the tRNA(Met-e), although still efficiently recognized by the valyl-tRNA synthetase, are not imported any more into mitochondria. These data demonstrate that in plants, besides identity elements required for the recognition by the cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, tRNA molecules contain other determinants that are essential for mitochondrial import selectivity. Indeed, this suggests that the tRNA import mechanism occurring in plant mitochondria may be different from what has been described so far in yeast or in protozoa.     

Visualizing bacterial tRNA identity determinants and antideterminants using function logos and inverse function logos

Sequence logos are stacked bar graphs that generalize the notion of consensus sequence. They employ entropy statistics very effectively to display variation in a structural alignment of sequences of a common function, while emphasizing its over-represented features. Yet sequence logos cannot display features that distinguish functional subclasses within a structurally related superfamily nor do they display under-represented features. We introduce two extensions to address these needs: function logos and inverse logos. Function logos display subfunctions that are over-represented among sequences carrying a specific feature. Inverse logos generalize both sequence logos and function logos by displaying under-represented, rather than over-represented, features or functions in structural alignments. To make inverse logos, a compositional inverse is applied to the feature or function frequency distributions before logo construction, where a compositional inverse is a mathematical transform that makes common features or functions rare and vice versa. We applied these methods to a database of structurally aligned bacterial tDNAs to create highly condensed, birds-eye views of potentially all so-called identity determinants and antideterminants that confer specific amino acid charging or initiator function on tRNAs in bacteria. We recovered both known and a few potentially novel identity elements. Function logos and inverse logos are useful tools for exploratory bioinformatic analysis of structure-function relationships in sequence families and superfamilies.     

Rapid Shifts in Mitochondrial tRNA Import in a Plant Lineage with Extensive Mitochondrial tRNA Gene Loss

In most eukaryotes, transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are one of the very few classes of genes remaining in the mitochondrial genome, but some mitochondria have lost these vestiges of their prokaryotic ancestry. Sequencing of mitogenomes from the flowering plant genus Silene previously revealed a large range in tRNA gene content, suggesting rapid and ongoing gene loss/replacement. Here, we use this system to test longstanding hypotheses about how mitochondrial tRNA genes are replaced by importing nuclear-encoded tRNAs. We traced the evolutionary history of these gene loss events by sequencing mitochondrial genomes from key outgroups (Agrostemma githago and Silene [=Lychnis] chalcedonica). We then performed the first global sequencing of purified plant mitochondrial tRNA populations to characterize the expression of mitochondrial-encoded tRNAs and the identity of imported nuclear-encoded tRNAs. We also confirmed the utility of high-throughput sequencing methods for the detection of tRNA import by sequencing mitochondrial tRNA populations in a species (Solanum tuberosum) with known tRNA trafficking patterns. Mitochondrial tRNA sequencing in Silene revealed substantial shifts in the abundance of some nuclear-encoded tRNAs in conjunction with their recent history of mt-tRNA gene loss and surprising cases where tRNAs with anticodons still encoded in the mitochondrial genome also appeared to be imported. These data suggest that nuclear-encoded counterparts are likely replacing mitochondrial tRNAs even in systems with recent mitochondrial tRNA gene loss, and the redundant import of a nuclear-encoded tRNA may provide a mechanism for functional replacement between translation systems separated by billions of years of evolutionary divergence.     

Pathogenic mutations in antisense mitochondrial tRNAs

Pathogenic mutations in mitochondrial tRNAs are 6.5 times more frequent than in other mitochondrial genes. This suggests that tRNA mutations perturb more than one function. A potential additional tRNA gene function is that of templating for antisense tRNAs. Pathogenic mutations weaken cloverleaf secondary structures of sense tRNAs. Analyses here show similar effects for most antisense tRNAs, especially after adjusting for associations between sense and antisense cloverleaf stabilities. These results imply translational activity by antisense tRNAs. For sense tRNAs Ala and Ser UCN, pathogenicity associates as much with sense as with antisense cloverleaf formation. For tRNA Pro, pathogenicity seems associated only with antisense, not sense tRNA cloverleaf formation. Translational activity by antisense tRNAs is expected for the 11 antisense tRNAs processed by regular sense RNA maturation, those recognized by their cognate amino acid’s tRNA synthetase, and those forming relatively stable cloverleaves as compared to their sense counterpart. Most antisense tRNAs probably function routinely in translation and extend the tRNA pool (extension hypothesis); others do not (avoidance hypothesis). The greater the expected translational activity of an antisense tRNA, the more pathogenic mutations weaken its cloverleaf secondary structure. Some evidence for RNA interference, a more classical role for antisense tRNAs, exists only for tRNA Ser UCN. Mutation pathogenicity probably frequently results from a mixture of effects due to sense and antisense tRNA translational activity for many mitochondrial tRNAs. Genomic studies should routinely explore for translational activity by antisense tRNAs.     

Crystal structure of a transfer‐ribonucleoprotein particle that promotes asparagine formation

Four out of the 22 aminoacyl‐tRNAs (aa‐tRNAs) are systematically or alternatively synthesized by an indirect, two‐step route requiring an initial mischarging of the tRNA followed by tRNA‐dependent conversion of the non‐cognate amino acid. During tRNA‐dependent asparagine formation, tRNA^Asn promotes assembly of a ribonucleoprotein particle called transamidosome that allows channelling of the aa‐tRNA from non‐discriminating aspartyl‐tRNA synthetase active site to the GatCAB amidotransferase site. The crystal structure of the Thermus thermophilus transamidosome determined at 3 Å resolution reveals a particle formed by two GatCABs, two dimeric ND‐AspRSs and four tRNAs^Asn molecules. In the complex, only two tRNAs are bound in a functional state, whereas the two other ones act as an RNA scaffold enabling release of the asparaginyl‐tRNA^Asn without dissociation of the complex. We propose that the crystal structure represents a transient state of the transamidation reaction. The transamidosome constitutes a transfer‐ribonucleoprotein particle in which tRNAs serve the function of both substrate and structural foundation for a large molecular machine.     

Avoidance of antisense, antiterminator tRNA anticodons in vertebrate mitochondria

Protein synthesis (translation) stops at stop codons, codons not complemented by tRNA anticodons. tRNAs matching stops, antitermination (Ter) tRNAs, prevent translational termination, producing dysfunctional proteins. Genomes avoid tRNAs with anticodons whose complement (the anticodon of the ‘antisense’ tRNA) matches stops. This suggests that antisense tRNAs, which also form cloverleaves, are occasionally expressed. Mitochondrial antisense tRNA expression is plausible, because both DNA strands are transcribed as single RNAs, and tRNA structures signal RNA maturation. Results describe potential antisense Ter tRNAs in mammalian mitochondrial genomes detected by tRNAscan-SE, and evidence for adaptations preventing translational antitermination: genomes possessing Ter tRNAs use less corresponding stop codons; antisense Ter tRNAs form weaker cloverleaves than homologuous non-Ter antisense tRNAs; and genomic stop codon usages decrease with stabilities of codon-anticodon interactions and of Ter tRNA cloverleaves. This suggests that antisense tRNAs frequently function in translation. Results suggest that opposite strand coding is exceptional in modern genes, yet might be frequent for mitochondrial tRNAs. This adds antisense tRNA templating to other mitochondrial tRNA functions: sense tRNA templating, formation and regulation of secondary (light strand DNA) replication origins. Antitermination probably affects mitochondrial degenerative diseases and ageing: pathogenic mutations are twice as frequent in tRNAs with antisense Ter anticodons than in other tRNAs, and species lacking mitochondrial antisense Ter tRNAs have longer mean maximal lifespans than those possessing antisense Ter tRNAs.     

Identification and codon reading properties of 5-cyanomethyl uridine,a new modified nucleoside found in the anticodon wobble position of mutant haloarchaeal isoleucine tRNAs

Most archaea and bacteria use a modified C in the anticodon wobble position of isoleucine tRNA to base pair with A but not with G of the mRNA. This allows the tRNA to read the isoleucine codon AUA without also reading the methionine codon AUG. To understand why a modified C, and not U or modified U, is used to base pair with A, we mutated the C34 in the anticodon of Haloarcula marismortui isoleucine tRNA (tRNA₂^Ile) to U, expressed the mutant tRNA in Haloferax volcanii, and purified and analyzed the tRNA. Ribosome binding experiments show that although the wild-type tRNA₂^Ile binds exclusively to the isoleucine codon AUA, the mutant tRNA binds not only to AUA but also to AUU, another isoleucine codon, and to AUG, a methionine codon. The G34 to U mutant in the anticodon of another H. marismortui isoleucine tRNA species showed similar codon binding properties. Binding of the mutant tRNA to AUG could lead to misreading of the AUG codon and insertion of isoleucine in place of methionine. This result would explain why most archaea and bacteria do not normally use U or a modified U in the anticodon wobble position of isoleucine tRNA for reading the codon AUA. Biochemical and mass spectrometric analyses of the mutant tRNAs have led to the discovery of a new modified nucleoside, 5-cyanomethyl U in the anticodon wobble position of the mutant tRNAs. 5-Cyanomethyl U is present in total tRNAs from euryarchaea but not in crenarchaea, eubacteria, or eukaryotes.     

Selenocysteine inserting tRNAs: an overview

One of the recent discoveries in protein biosynthesis was the finding that selenocysteine, the 21st amino acid, is cotranslationally inserted into polypeptides under the direction of a UGA codon assisted by a specific structural signal in the mRNA. The key to selenocysteine biosynthesis and insertion is a special tRNA species, tRNA(Sec). The formation of selenocysteine from serine represents an interesting tRNA-mediated amino acid transformation. tRNA(Sec) (or the gene encoding it) has been found over all three domains of life. It displays a number of unique features that designate it a selenocysteine-inserting tRNA and differentiate it from canonical elongator tRNAs. Although there are still some uncertainties concerning the precise secondary and tertiary structures of eukaryal tRNA(Sec), the major identity determinant for selenocysteine biosynthesis and insertion appears to be the 13 bp long extended acceptor arm. In addition the core of the 3D structure of these tRNAs is different from that of class II tRNAs like tRNA(Sec). The biological implications of these structural differences still remain to be fully understood.     

Interaction of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases with tRNA: General principles and distinguishing characteristics of the high-molecular-weight substrate recognition

This review summarizes results of numerous (mainly functional) studies that have been accumulated over recent years on the problem of tRNA recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Development and employment of approaches that use synthetic mutant and chimeric tRNAs have demonstrated general principles underlying highly specific interaction in different systems. The specificity of interaction is determined by a certain number of nucleotides and structural elements of tRNA (constituting the set of recognition elements or specificity determinants), which are characteristic of each pair. Crystallographic structures available for many systems provide the details of the molecular basis of selective interaction. Diversity and identity of biochemical functions of the recognition elements make substantial contribution to the specificity of such interactions.     

tRNA Creation by Hairpin Duplication

Many studies have suggested that the modern cloverleaf structure of tRNA may have arisen through duplication of a primordial hairpin, but the timing of this duplication event has been unclear. Here we measure the level of sequence identity between the two halves of each of a large sample of tRNAs and compare this level to that of chimeric tRNAs constructed either within or between groups defined by phylogeny and/or specificity. We find that actual tRNAs have significantly more matches between the two halves than do random sequences that can form the tRNA structure, but there is no difference in the average level of matching between the two halves of an individual tRNA and the average level of matching between the two halves of the chimeric tRNAs in any of the sets we constructed. These results support the hypothesis that the modern tRNA cloverleaf arose from a single hairpin duplication prior to the divergence of modern tRNA specificities and the three domains of life. [Reviewing Editor: Dr. Niles Lehman]     

Mapping hidden potential identity elements by computing the average discriminating power of individual tRNA positions

The recently published discrete mathematical method, extended consensus partition (ECP), identifies nucleotide types at each position that are strictly absent from a given sequence set, while occur in other sets. These are defined as discriminating elements (DEs). In this study using the ECP approach, we mapped potential hidden identity elements that discriminate the 20 different tRNA identities. We filtered the tDNA data set for the obligatory presence of well-established tRNA features, and then separately for each identity set, the presence of already experimentally identified strictly present identity elements. The analysis was performed on the three kingdoms of life. We determined the number of DE, e.g. the number of sets discriminated by the given position, for each tRNA position of each tRNA identity set. Then, from the positional DE numbers obtained from the 380 pairwise comparisons of the 20 identity sets, we calculated the average excluding value (AEV) for each tRNA position. The AEV provides a measure on the overall discriminating power of each position. Using a statistical analysis, we show that positional AEVs correlate with the number of already identified identity elements. Positions having high AEV but lacking published identity elements predict hitherto undiscovered tRNA identity elements.     

Functional idiosyncrasies of tRNA isoacceptors in cognate and noncognate aminoacylation systems

The specificity of transfer RNA aminoacylation by cognate aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is a crucial step for synthesis of functional proteins. It is established that the aminoacylation identity of a single tRNA or of a family of tRNA isoacceptors is linked to the presence of positive signals (determinants) allowing recognition by cognate synthetases and negative signals (antideterminants) leading to rejection by the noncognate ones. The completion of identity sets was generally tested by transplantation of the corresponding nucleotides into one or several host tRNAs which acquire as a consequence the new aminoacylation specificities. Such transplantation experiments were also useful to detect peculiar structural refinements required for optimal expression of a given aminoacylation identity set within a host tRNA. This study explores expression of the defined yeast aspartate identity set into different tRNA scaffolds of a same specificity, namely the four yeast tRNA(Arg) isoacceptors. The goal was to investigate whether expression of the new identity is similar due to the unique specificity of the host tRNAs or whether it is differently expressed due to their peculiar sequences and structural features. In vitro transcribed native tRNA(Arg) isoacceptors and variants bearing the aspartate identity elements were prepared and their aminoacylation properties established. The four wild-type isoacceptors are active in arginylation with catalytic efficiencies in a 20-fold range and are inactive in aspartylation. While transplanted tRNA(1)(Arg) and tRNA(4)(Arg) are converted into highly efficient substrates for yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, transplanted tRNA(2)(Arg) and tRNA(3)(Arg) remain poorly aspartylated. Search for antideterminants in these two tRNAs reveals idiosyncratic features. Conversion of the single base-pair C6-G67 into G6-C67, the pair present in tRNA(Asp), allows full expression of the aspartate identity in the transplanted tRNA(2)(Arg), but not in tRNA(3)(Arg). It is concluded that the different isoacceptor tRNAs protect themselves from misaminoacylation by idiosyncratic pathways of antidetermination.     

来源于tRNA的小分子RNA——降解碎片还是新的调控分子

具有经典三叶草结构的tRNA作为细胞蛋白质合成机器的重要元件,已经拥有几十年深入细致的研究历史.但是,对于其功能的认识远没有止境,尤其在其作为潜在的基因表达调控分子前体的功能目前正逐渐被人们认识.最新的多项研究结果表明,在多种细胞系中通过高通量测序发现某种来源于tRNA的小片段RNA,这些剪切产物被认为与多种microRNA加工体系关键分子(如Dicer、Ago家族中的蛋白质)具有相互作用的能力.同时,报告基因检测系统的研究结果也暗示,这些小片段RNA具有类似microRNA的潜在调控功能,可能在细胞应对外界环境刺激时发挥重要的调节作用.如其具体的作用机制能够被更多的实验结果阐明,将极大地扩展我们对于非编码RNA调控功能的认识.     

Universal rules and idiosyncratic features in tRNA identity.

Correct expression of the genetic code at translation is directly correlated with tRNA identity. This survey describes the molecular signals in tRNAs that trigger specific aminoacylations. For most tRNAs, determinants are located at the two distal extremities: the anticodon loop and the amino acid accepting stem. In a few tRNAs, however, major identity signals are found in the core of the molecule. Identity elements have different strengths, often depend more on k cat effects than on K m effects and exhibit additive, cooperative or anti-cooperative interplay. Most determinants are in direct contact with cognate synthetases, and chemical groups on bases or ribose moieties that make functional interactions have been identified in several systems. Major determinants are conserved in evolution; however, the mechanisms by which they are expressed are species dependent. Recent studies show that alternate identity sets can be recognized by a single synthetase, and emphasize the importance of tRNA architecture and anti-determinants preventing false recognition. Identity rules apply to tRNA-like molecules and to minimalist tRNAs. Knowledge of these rules allows the manipulation of identity elements and engineering of tRNAs with switched, altered or multiple specificities.     

Altered expression of plant lysyl tRNA synthetase promotes tRNA misacylation and translational recoding of lysine

The Arabidopsis thaliana lysyl tRNA synthetase (AtKRS) structurally and functionally resembles the well-characterized prokaryotic class IIb KRS, including the propensity to aminoacylate tRNA(Lys) with suboptimal identity elements, as well as non-cognate tRNAs. Transient expression of AtKRS in carrot cells promotes aminoacylation of such tRNAs in vivo and translational recoding of lysine at nonsense codons. Stable expression of AtKRS in Zea mays causes translational recoding of lysine into zeins, significantly enriching the lysine content of grain.     

Identification and characterization of a tRNA decoding the rare AUA codon in Haloarcula marismortui

Annotation of the complete genome of the extreme halophilic archaeon Haloarcula marismortui does not include a tRNA for translation of AUA, the rare codon for isoleucine. This is a situation typical for most archaeal genomes sequenced to date. Based on computational analysis, it has been proposed recently that a single intron-containing tRNA gene produces two very similar but functionally different tRNAs by means of alternative splicing; a UGG-decoding tRNA(TrpCCA) and an AUA-decoding tRNA(IleUAU). Through analysis of tRNAs from H. marismortui, we have confirmed the presence of tRNA(TrpCCA), but found no evidence for the presence of tRNA(IleUAU). Instead, we have shown that a tRNA, currently annotated as elongator methionine tRNA and containing CAU as the anticodon, is aminoacylated with isoleucine in vivo and that this tRNA represents the missing isoleucine tRNA. Interestingly, this tRNA carries a base modification of C34 in the anticodon different from the well-known lysidine found in eubacteria, which switches the amino acid identity of the tRNA from methionine to isoleucine and its decoding specificity from AUG to AUA. The methods described in this work for the identification of individual tRNAs present in H. marismortui provide the tools necessary for experimentally confirming the presence of any tRNA in a cell and, thereby, to test computational predictions of tRNA genes.