Endosomal Trafficking of HIV-1 Gag and Genomic RNAs Regulates Viral Egress

HIV-1 Gag can assemble and generate virions at the plasma membrane, but it is also present in endosomes where its role remains incompletely characterized. Here, we show that HIV-1 RNAs and Gag are transported on endosomal vesicles positive for TiVamp, a v-SNARE involved in fusion events with the plasma membrane. Inhibition of endosomal traffic did not prevent viral release. However, inhibiting lysosomal degradation induced an accumulation of Gag in endosomes and increased viral production 7-fold, indicating that transport of Gag to lysosomes negatively regulates budding. This also suggested that endosomal Gag-RNA complexes could access retrograde pathways to the cell surface and indeed, depleting cells of TiVamp-reduced viral production. Moreover, inhibition of endosomal transport prevented the accumulation of Gag at sites of cellular contact. HIV-1 Gag could thus generate virions using two pathways, either directly from the plasma membrane or through an endosome-dependent route. Endosomal Gag-RNA complexes may be delivered at specific sites to facilitate cell-to-cell viral transmission.The production of infectious retroviral particles is an ordered process that includes many steps (for review see Refs. 1–3). In particular, three major viral components, Gag, the envelope, and genomic RNAs have to traffic inside the cell to reach their assembly site. Viral biogenesis is driven by the polyprotein Gag, which is able to make viral-like particles when expressed alone (4). Upon release, HIV-1⁴ Gag is processed by the viral protease into matrix (MA(p17)), capsid (CA(p24)), nucleocapsid (NC(p7)), p6, and smaller peptides SP1 and SP2. Gag contains several domains that are essential for viral assembly: a membrane binding domain (M) in MA; a Gag-Gag interaction domain in CA; an assembly domain (I) in NC; and a late domain (L) in p6, which recruits the cellular budding machinery. Genomic RNAs are specifically recognized by NC, and they play fundamental roles in viral biogenesis by acting as a scaffold for Gag multimerization (5).It has been demonstrated that retroviruses bud by hijacking the endosomal machinery that sorts proteins into internal vesicles of multivesicular bodies (for review, see Refs. 6, 7). Indeed, these vesicles bud with the same topology as viral particles. Proteins sorted into this pathway are usually destined for degradation in lysosomes, but some can also recycle to the plasma membrane (for review see Refs. 8, 9). They are also frequently ubiquitinated on their cytoplasmic domain (10, 11), allowing their recognition by ESCRT complexes. ESCRT-0 and ESCRT-I recognize ubiquitinated cargo present at the surface of endosomes and recruit other ESCRT complexes (12–14). ESCRT-III is believed to function directly in the formation of multivesicular body intralumenal vesicles (12), even though its mechanism of action is currently not understood. Remarkably, Gag L domains interact directly with components of the multivesicular body-sorting machinery (for review see Ref. 15). HIV-1 Gag uses a PTAP motif to bind Tsg101, a component of ESCRT-I (16–19), and a YPLTSL motif to interact with Alix, a protein linked to ESCRT-I and -III (20–22). Finally, various ubiquitin ligases are also required directly or indirectly during HIV-1 biogenesis (23, 24; for review see Ref. 25).In many cell lines, Gag is found both at the plasma membrane and in endosomes. This has led to the hypothesis that there are several assembly sites for HIV-1 (1, 3). First, Gag can initiate and complete assembly at the plasma membrane. This is thought to occur predominantly in T lymphocytes, and this process is supported by several lines of evidences: (i) disruption of endosomal trafficking with drugs does not prevent viral production (26, 27); (ii) ESCRT complexes can be recruited at the plasma membrane, at sites where Gag accumulates (28–30); (iii) Gag can be seen multimerizing and budding from the plasma membrane in live cells (31). Second, Gag could initiate assembly in endosomes, and then traffic to the cell surface to be released. This is mainly supported by the presence of Gag in endosomes in several cell lines (32–34), including T cells and more strikingly macrophages (32, 35, 36–39). However, we are currently lacking functional experiments addressing the role of this endosomal pool of Gag, and it is still not clear to what extent it contributes to the production of viral particles. Nevertheless, the presence of Gag in endosomes might facilitate recruitment of ESCRT complexes (34, 40), packaging of viral genomic RNAs (32, 41), and incorporation of the envelope (42). It may also be important for polarized budding (43, 44) and to create a viral reservoir in infected cells (45, 46).Despite great progress, the traffic of HIV-1 components is still not fully elucidated. In particular, the transport of the genomic RNAs is poorly understood. In this study, we have used single molecule techniques to investigate the trafficking of HIV-1 RNAs in fixed and live cells, and we show that they are transported on endosomal vesicles. We also obtained functional evidence that Gag and viral RNAs can use at least two trafficking pathways to produce virions, one going directly from the plasma membrane and another one passing through endosomes.     

The Ins and Outs of Ring-Cleaving Dioxygenases

ABSTRACT

Ring-cleaving dioxygenases catalyze the oxygenolytic fission of catecholic compounds, a critical step in the aerobic degradation of aromatic compounds by bacteria. Two classes of these enzymes have been identified, based on the mode of ring cleavage: intradiol dioxygenases utilize non-heme Fe(III) to cleave the aromatic nucleus ortho to the hydroxyl substituents; and extradiol dioxygenases utilize non-heme Fe(II) or other divalent metal ions to cleave the aromatic nucleus meta to the hydroxyl substituents. Recent genomic, structural, spectroscopic, and kinetic studies have increased our understanding of the distribution, evolution, and mechanisms of these enzymes. Overall, extradiol dioxygenases appear to be more versatile than their intradiol counterparts. Thus, the former cleave a wider variety of substrates, have evolved on a larger number of structural scaffolds, and occur in a wider variety of pathways, including biosynthetic pathways and pathways that degrade non-aromatic compounds. The catalytic mechanisms of the two enzymes proceed via similar iron-alkylperoxo intermediates. The ability of extradiol enzymes to act on a variety of non-catecholic compounds is consistent with proposed differences in the breakdown of this iron-alkylperoxo intermediate in the two enzymes, involving alkenyl migration in extradiol enzymes and acyl migration in intradiol enzymes. Nevertheless, despite recent advances in our understanding of these fascinating enzymes, the major determinant of the mode of ring cleavage remains unknown.     

Ins and Outs of Interpreting Lipidomic Results

Membrane lipids are essential for life; however, research on how cells regulate cell lipid composition has been falling behind for quite some time. One reason was the difficulty in establishing analytical methods able to cope with the cell lipid repertoire. Development of a diversity of mass spectrometry-based technologies, including imaging mass spectrometry, has helped to demonstrate beyond doubt that the cell lipidome is not only greatly cell type dependent but also highly sensitive to any pathophysiological alteration such as differentiation or tumorigenesis. Interestingly, the current popularization of metabolomic studies among numerous disciplines has led many researchers to rediscover lipids. Hence, it is important to underscore the peculiarities of these metabolites and their metabolism, which are both radically different from protein and nucleic acid metabolism. Once differences in lipid composition have been established, researchers face a rather complex scenario, to investigate the signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms accounting for their results. Thus, a detail often overlooked, but of crucial relevance, is the complex networks of enzymes involved in controlling the level of each one of the lipid species present in the cell. In most cases, these enzymes are redundant and promiscuous, complicating any study on lipid metabolism, since the modification of one particular lipid enzyme impacts simultaneously on many species. Altogether, this review aims to describe the difficulties in delving into the regulatory mechanisms tailoring the lipidome at the activity, genetic, and epigenetic level, while conveying the numerous, stimulating, and sometimes unexpected research opportunities afforded by this type of studies.     

Viral Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation: A Novel Tool to Study Intracellular Vesicular Trafficking Pathways

The Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1) accessory protein Nef interacts with a multitude of cellular proteins, manipulating the host membrane trafficking machinery to evade immune surveillance. Nef interactions have been analyzed using various in vitro assays, co-immunoprecipitation studies, and more recently mass spectrometry. However, these methods do not evaluate Nef interactions in the context of viral infection nor do they define the sub-cellular location of these interactions. In this report, we describe a novel bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) lentiviral expression tool, termed viral BiFC, to study Nef interactions with host cellular proteins in the context of viral infection. Using the F2A cleavage site from the foot and mouth disease virus we generated a viral BiFC expression vector capable of concurrent expression of Nef and host cellular proteins; PACS-1, MHC-I and SNX18. Our studies confirmed the interaction between Nef and PACS-1, a host membrane trafficking protein involved in Nef-mediated immune evasion, and demonstrated co-localization of this complex with LAMP-1 positive endolysosomal vesicles. Furthermore, we utilized viral BiFC to localize the Nef/MHC-I interaction to an AP-1 positive endosomal compartment. Finally, viral BiFC was observed between Nef and the membrane trafficking regulator SNX18. This novel demonstration of an association between Nef and SNX18 was localized to AP-1 positive vesicles. In summary, viral BiFC is a unique tool designed to analyze the interaction between Nef and host cellular proteins by mapping the sub-cellular locations of their interactions during viral infection.     

Retromer-Mediated Protein Sorting and Vesicular Trafficking

Retromer is an evolutionarily conserved multimeric protein complex that mediates intracellular transport of various vesicular cargoes and functions in a wide variety of cellular processes including polarized trafficking,developmental signaling and lysosome biogenesis.Through its interaction with the Rab GTPases and their effectors,membrane lipids,molecular motors,the endocytic machinery and actin nucleation promoting factors,retromer regulates sorting and trafficking of transmembrane proteins from endosomes to the trans-Golgi network(TGN) and the plasma membrane.In this review.I highlight recent progress in the understanding of relromer-medialed protein sorting and vesicle trafficking and discuss how retromer contributes to a diverse set of developmental,physiological and pathological processes.     

Astroglial Vesicular Trafficking in Neurodegenerative Diseases

The neocortex represents one of the largest estates of the human brain. This structure comprises ~30–40 billions of neurones and even more of non-neuronal cells. Astrocytes, highly heterogeneous homoeostatic glial cells, are fundamental for housekeeping of the brain and contribute to information processing in neuronal networks. Gray matter astrocytes tightly enwrap synapses, contact blood vessels and, naturally, are also in contact with the extracellular space, where convection of fluid takes place. Thus astrocytes receive signals from several distinct extracellular domains and can get excited by numerous mechanisms, which regulate cytosolic concentration of second messengers, such as Ca²⁺ and cAMP. Excited astrocytes often secrete diverse substances (generally referred to as gliosignalling molecules) that include classical neurotransmitters such as glutamate and ATP or neuromodulators such as d-serine or neuropeptides. Astrocytic secretion occurs through several mechanisms: by diffusion through membrane channels, by translocation via plasmalemmal transporters or by vesicular exocytosis. Vesicular release of gliosignalling molecules appears fundamentally similar to that operating in neurones, since it depends on the SNARE proteins-dependent merger of the vesicle membrane with the plasmalemma. However, the coupling between the stimulus and astroglial vesicular secretion is at least one order of magnitude slower than that in neurones. Here we review mechanisms of astrocytic excitability and the molecular, anatomical and physiological properties of vesicular apparatus mediating the release of gliosignalling molecules in health and in the neurodegenerative pathology.     

The Ins and Outs of Nondestructive Cell-to-Cell and Systemic Movement of Plant Viruses

Propagation of viral infection in host plants comprises two distinct and sequential stages: viral transport from the initially infected cell into adjacent neighboring cells, a process termed local or cell-to-cell movement, and a chain of events collectively referred to as systemic movement that consists of entry into the vascular tissue, systemic distribution with the phloem stream, and unloading of the virus into noninfected tissues. To achieve intercellular transport, viruses exploit plasmodesmata, complex cytoplasmic bridges interconnecting plant cells. Viral transport through plasmodesmata is aided by virus-encoded proteins, the movement proteins (MPs), which function by two distinct mechanisms: MPs either bind viral nucleic acids and mediate passage of the resulting movement complexes (M-complexes) between cells, or MPs become a part of pathogenic tubules that penetrate through host cell walls and serve as conduits for transport of viral particles. In the first mechanism, M-complexes pass into neighboring cells without destroying or irreversibly altering plasmodesmata, whereas in the second mechanism plasmodesmata are replaced or significantly modified by the tubules. Here we summarize the current knowledge on both local and systemic movement of viruses that progress from cell to cell as M-complexes in a nondestructive fashion. For local movement, we focus mainly on movement functions of the 30 K superfamily viruses, which encode MPs with structural homology to the 30 kDa MP of Tobacco mosaic virus, one of the most extensively studied plant viruses, whereas systemic movement is primarily described for two well-characterized model systems, Tobacco mosaic virus and Tobacco etch potyvirus. Because local and systemic movement are intimately linked to the molecular infrastructure of the host cell, special emphasis is placed on host factors and cellular structures involved in viral transport.