A photoregulated ligand for the nuclear import receptor karyopherin alpha.

The ability to orchestrate the transport of proteins between nucleus and cytoplasm provides cells with a powerful regulatory mechanism. Selective translocation between these compartments is often used to propagate cellular signals, and it is an intimate part of the processes that control cell division, viral replication, and other cellular events. Therefore, precise experimental control over protein localization, through the agency of light, would provide a powerful tool for the study and manipulation of these events. To this end, a prototype photoregulated nuclear localization signal (NLS) was derived from a native NLS. A library of 30 mutants of the bipartite NLS from Xenopus laevis nucleoplasmin containing a novel, photoisomerizable amino acid was prepared by parallel, solid-phase synthesis and screened in vitro for binding to the nuclear import receptor karyopherin alpha, which mediates the nuclear import of cellular proteins. A single peptide was identified in which the cis and trans photoisomers bind the receptor differentially. The strategy used to obtain this peptide is systematic and empirical; therefore, it is potentially applicable to any peptide-receptor system.     

Distinct nuclear import and export pathways mediated by members of the karyopherin β family

Transport of proteins into and out of the nucleus occurs through nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) and is mediated by the interaction of transport factors with nucleoporins at the NPC. Nuclear import of proteins containing classical nuclear localization signals (NLSs) is mediated by a heterodimeric protein complex, composed of karyopherin α and β1, that docks via β1 the NLS-protein to the NPC. The GTPase Ran; the RanGDP binding protein, p10; and the RanGTP binding protein, RanBP1 are involved in translocation of the docked NLS-protein into the nucleus. Recently, new distinct nuclear import and export pathways that are mediated by members of the karyopherin β family have been discovered. Karyopherin β2 mediates import of mRNA binding proteins, whereas karyopherin β3 and β4 mediate import of a set of ribosomal proteins. Two other β karyopherin family members, CRM1 and CAS, mediate export of proteins containing leucine-rich nuclear export signals (NES) and reexport of karyopherin α, respectively. This growing family contains new members that constitute potential transport factors for cargoes yet to be identified in the future. The common features of the members of karyopherin β family are the ability to bind RanGTP and the ability to interact directly with nucleoporins at the NPC. The challenge for the future will be to identify the distinct or, perhaps, overlapping cargo(es) for each member of the karyopherin β superfamily and to characterize the molecular mechanisms of translocation of karyopherins together with their cargoes through the NPC. J. Cell. Biochem. 70:231–239, 1998.© 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

The nuclear import of RCC1 requires a specific nuclear localization sequence receptor, karyopherin alpha3/Qip

RCC1 is the only known guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the small GTPase Ran and is normally found inside the nucleus bound to chromatin. In order to analyze in more detail the nuclear import of RCC1, we created a fusion construct in which four IgG binding domains of protein A were fused to the amino terminus of human RCC1 (pA-RCC1). Surprisingly, we found that neither Xenopus ovarian cytosol nor a mixture of recombinant import factors (karyopherin alpha2, karyopherin beta1, Ran, and p10/NTF2) were able to support the import of pA-RCC1 into the nuclei of digitonin-permeabilized cells. Both, in contrast, were capable of supporting the import of a construct containing another classical nuclear localization sequence (NLS), glutathione S-transferase-green fluorescent protein-NLS. Subsequently, we found that only one of the NLS receptors, karyopherin alpha3 (Kapalpha3/Qip), would support significant nuclear import of pA-RCC1 in permeabilized cells, while members of the other two main classes, Kapalpha1 and Kapalpha2, would not. Accordingly, in vitro binding studies revealed that only Kapalpha3 showed significant binding to RCC1 (unlike Kapalpha1 and Kapalpha2) and that this binding was dependent on the basic amino acids present in the RCC1 NLS. In addition to Kapalpha3, we found that the nuclear import of pA-RCC1 also required both karyopherin beta1 and Ran.     

A simple, solid-phase binding assay for the nuclear import receptor karyopherin alpha. Part 1: direct binding

The nuclear import receptor karyopherin alpha recognizes nuclear localization signals (NLSs), peptides that direct the transport of proteins into the nucleus. A simple, colorimetric assay has been developed to facilitate the identification and comparison of karyopherin ligands by direct and competitive binding using NLSs immobilized on the solid phase (TentaGel resin).     

A simple, solid-phase binding assay for the nuclear import receptor karyopherin alpha. Part 2: competitive binding

A qualitative assay for the evaluation of soluble ligands of the nuclear import receptor karyopherin alpha has been developed. The assay relies on competition with an immobilized ligand, the nuclear localization signal (NLS) from nucleoplasmin, for binding to the receptor, which is detected by an enzyme-linked colorimetric method.     

Role of the karyopherin pathway in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nuclear import.

The interaction of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) nucleoprotein complex with the cell nuclear import machinery is necessary for viral replication in macrophages and for the establishment of infection in quiescent T lymphocytes. The karyophilic properties of two viral proteins, matrix (MA) and Vpr, are keys to this process. Here, we show that an early step of HIV-1 nuclear import is the recognition of the MA nuclear localization signal (NLS) by Rch1, a member of the karyopherin-alpha family. Furthermore, we demonstrate that an N-terminally truncated form of Rch1 which binds MA but fails to localize to the nucleus efficiently blocks MA- but not Vpr-mediated HIV-1 nuclear import. Correspondingly, NLS peptide inhibits the nuclear migration of MA but not that of Vpr and prevents the infection of terminally differentiated macrophages by vpr-defective virus but not wild-type virus. These results are consistent with a model in which Rch1 or another member of the karyopherin-alpha family, through the recognition of the MA NLS, participates in docking the HIV-1 nucleoprotein complex at the nuclear pore. In addition, our data suggest that Vpr governs HIV-1 nuclear import through a distinct pathway.     

The versatility of the αβ T‐cell antigen receptor

The T‐cell antigen receptor is a heterodimeric αβ protein (TCR) expressed on the surface of T‐lymphocytes, with each chain of the TCR comprising three complementarity‐determining regions (CDRs) that collectively form the antigen‐binding site. Unlike antibodies, which are closely related proteins that recognize intact protein antigens, TCRs classically bind, via their CDR loops, to peptides (p) that are presented by molecules of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). This TCR‐pMHC interaction is crucially important in cell‐mediated immunity, with the specificity in the cellular immune response being attributable to MHC polymorphism, an extensive TCR repertoire and a variable peptide cargo. The ensuing structural and biophysical studies within the TCR‐pMHC axis have been highly informative in understanding the fundamental events that underpin protective immunity and dysfunctional T‐cell responses that occur during autoimmunity. In addition, TCRs can recognize the CD1 family, a family of MHC‐related molecules that instead of presenting peptides are ideally suited to bind lipid‐based antigens. Structural studies within the CD1‐lipid antigen system are beginning to inform us how lipid antigens are specifically presented by CD1, and how such CD1‐lipid antigen complexes are recognized by the TCR. Moreover, it has recently been shown that certain TCRs can bind to vitamin B based metabolites that are bound to an MHC‐like molecule termed MR1. Thus, TCRs can recognize peptides, lipids, and small molecule metabolites, and here we review the basic principles underpinning this versatile and fascinating receptor recognition system that is vital to a host's survival.     

Folate receptor α regulates cell proliferation in mouse gonadotroph αT3-1 cells

We have previously found that the mRNA and protein levels of the folate receptor alpha (FRα) are uniquely over-expressed in clinically human nonfunctional (NF) pituitary adenomas, but the mechanistic role of FRα has not fully been determined. We investigated the effect of FRα over-expression in the mouse gonadotroph αT3-1 cell line as a model for NF pituitary adenomas. We found that the expression and function of FRα were strongly up-regulated, by Western blotting and folic acid binding assay. Furthermore, we found a higher cell growth rate, an enhanced percentage of cells in S-phase by BrdU assay, and a higher PCNA staining. These observations indicate that over-expression of FRα promotes cell proliferation. These effects were abrogated in the same αT3-1 cells when transfected with a mutant FRα cDNA that confers a dominant-negative phenotype by inhibiting folic acid binding. Finally, by real-time quantitative PCR, we found that mRNA expression of NOTCH3 was up-regulated in FRα over-expressing cells. In summary, our data suggests that FRα regulates pituitary tumor cell proliferation and mechanistically may involve the NOTCH pathway. Potentially, this finding could be exploited to develop new, innovative molecular targeted treatment for human NF pituitary adenomas.     

Characterization of an Importin α/β‐recognized nuclear localization signal in β‐dystroglycan

β‐dystroglycan (β‐DG) is a widely expressed transmembrane protein that plays important roles in connecting the extracellular matrix to the cytoskeleton, and thereby contributing to plasma membrane integrity and signal transduction. We previously observed nuclear localization of β‐DG in cultured cell lines, implying the existence of a nuclear targeting mechanism that directs it to the nucleus instead of the plasma membrane. In this study, we delineate the nuclear import pathway of β‐DG, characterizing a functional nuclear localization signal (NLS) in the β‐DG cytoplasmic domain, within amino acids 776–782. The NLS either alone or in the context of the whole β‐DG protein was able to target the heterologous GFP protein to the nucleus, with site‐directed mutagenesis indicating that amino acids R⁷⁷⁹ and K⁷⁸⁰ are critical for NLS functionality. The nuclear transport molecules Importin (Imp)α and Impβ bound with high affinity to the NLS of β‐DG and were found to be essential for NLS‐dependent nuclear import in an in vitro reconstituted nuclear transport assay; cotransfection experiments confirmed the dependence on Ran for nuclear accumulation. Intriguingly, experiments suggested that tyrosine phosphorylation of β‐DG may result in cytoplasmic retention, with Y⁸⁹² playing a key role. β‐DG thus follows a conventional Impα/β‐dependent nuclear import pathway, with important implications for its potential function in the nucleus. J. Cell. Biochem. 110: 706–717, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Molecular determinants of desensitization and assembly of the chimeric GABAA receptor subunits (α1/γ2) and (γ2/α1) in combinations with β2 and γ2

Two γ-aminobutyric acid_A (GABA_A) receptor chimeras were designed in order to elucidate the structural requirements for GABA_A receptor desensitization and assembly. The (α1/γ2) and (γ2/α1) chimeric subunits representing the extracellular N-terminal domain of α1 or γ2 and the remainder of the γ2 or α1 subunits, respectively, were expressed with β2 and β2γ2 in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf-9) cells using the baculovirus expression system. The (α1/γ2)β2 and (α1/γ2)β2γ2 but not the (γ2/α1)β2 and (γ2/α1)β2γ2 subunit combinations formed functional receptor complexes as shown by whole-cell patch–clamp recordings and [³H]muscimol and [³H]flunitrazepam binding. Moreover, the surface immunofluorescence staining of Sf-9 cells expressing the (α1/γ2)-containing receptors was pronounced, as opposed to the staining of the (γ2/α1)-containing receptors, which was only slightly higher than background. To explain this, the (α1/γ2) and (γ2/α1) chimeras may act like α1 and γ2 subunits, respectively, indicating that the extracellular N-terminal segment is important for assembly. However, the (α1/γ2) chimeric subunit had characteristics different from the α1 subunit, since the (α1/γ2) chimera gave rise to no desensitization after GABA stimulation in whole-cell patch–clamp recordings, which was independent of whether the chimera was expressed in combination with β2 or β2γ2. Surprisingly, the (α1/γ2)(γ2/α1)β2 subunit combination did desensitize, indicating that the C-terminal segment of the α1 subunit may be important for desensitization. Moreover, desensitization was observed for the (α1/γ2)β2γ2 receptor with respect to the direct activation by pentobarbital. This suggests differences in the mechanism of channel activation for pentobarbital and GABA.     

Structural classification of αββ and ββα supersecondary structure units in proteins

We present a fully automatic structural classification of supersecondary structure units, consisting of two hydrogen-bonded β strands, preceded or followed by an α helix. The classification is performed on the spatial arrangement of the secondary structure elements, irrespective of the length and conformation of the intervening loops. The similarity of the arrangements is estimated by a structure alignment procedure that uses as similarity measure the root mean square deviation of superimposed backbone atoms. Applied to a set of 141 well-resolved nonhomologous protein structures, the classification yields 11 families of recurrent arrangements. In addition, fragments that are structurally intermediate between the families are found; they reveal the continuity of the classification. The analysis of the families shows that the α helix and β hairpin axes can adopt virtually all relative orientations, with, however, some preferable orientations; moreover, according to the orientation, preferences in the left/right handedness of the α–β connection are observed. These preferences can be explained by favorable side by side packing of the α helix and the β hairpin, local interactions in the region of the α–β connection or stabilizing environments in the parent protein. Furthermore, fold recognition procedures and structure prediction algorithms coupled to database-derived potentials suggest that the preferable nature of these arrangements does not imply their intrinsic stability. They usually accommodate a large number of sequences, of which only a subset is predicted to stabilize the motif. The motifs predicted as stable could correspond to nuclei formed at the very beginning of the folding process. Proteins 30:193–212, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Binding of rat α1-inhibitor-3-methylamine to the α2-macroglobulin signaling receptor induces second messengers

Binding of receptor-recognized forms of tetrameric human α₂-macroglobulin (α₂M*) to a macrophage signaling receptor induces cAMP synthesis, increases in inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP₃) synthesis, and a concomitant rise in cytosolic free calcium ([Ca²⁺]_i). The α₂M* signaling receptor is coupled to a pertussis-toxin insensitive G protein. Binding of α₂M* also occurs to the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/α₂M receptor (LRP/α₂MR), but this binding does not induce signal transduction. Rat α₁-inhibitor-3 (α₁I₃) is a monomeric member of the α-macroglobulin/complement superfamily. Like α₂M, it can react with proteinases or methylamine which induces a conformational change causing activated α₁I₃ to bind to LRP/α₂MR. We now report that α₁I₃-methylamine binds to the macrophage α₂M* signaling receptor inducing a rapid rise in the synthesis of IP₃ with a subsequent 1.5- to 3-fold rise in [Ca²⁺]_i. α₁I₃-methylamine binding to macrophages also caused a statistically significant elevation in cAMP. Native α₁I₃, like α₂M, was unable to induce signal transduction. α₁I₃ forms a complex with α₁-microglobulin, which has a distinct conformation from α₁I₃ and is recognized by LRP/α₂MR. This complex also induces an increase in [Ca²⁺]_i comparable to the effect of α₁I₃-methylamine on macrophages. It is concluded that activation of α₁I₃ by methylamine or binding of α₁-microglobulin causes similar conformational changes in the inhibitor, exposing the receptor recognition site for the α₂M* signaling receptor, as well as for LRP/α₂MR. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Studies on the 5α-androstane-3β, 17β-diol-6α-hydroxylase and on the 5α-androstane-3β, 17β-diol-7α-hydroxylase in anterior hypophysis of male rats.

In anterior pituitaries from male rats, it appeared that 5α-androstane-3β, 17β-diol was quickly metabolized into 5α-androstane-3β,6α-17β-triol and 5α-androstane-3β,7α, 17β-triol by action of 6α- and 7α-hydroxylases. Hydroxysteroid hydroxylases were located in endoplasmic reticulum and were dependent on NADPH⁺. Their optimum pH was 8.0, optima temperature, 37°C, and their apparent Km was 2.7 μM. Hydroxylative reactions were not reversible and not modified by gonadectomy. Hydroxylation seemed an efficient control of the pituitary level of 5α-andros-tane-3β, 17β-diol.     

5α,6α-Epoxy-cholestan-3β-ol (cholesterol α-oxide): A specific substrate for rat liver glutathione transferase B

A semi-micro assay was developed for the conjugation of 5α,6α-epoxy-cholestan-3β-ol (cholesterol α-oxide) with glutathione. The soluble supernatant of rat liver homogenate catalysed the reaction at a rate of 0.2–0.5 pmol.min⁻¹ .mg protein⁻¹ with 4μM cholesterol α-oxide, while the reaction in the presence of GSH alone was barely detectable. Enzymic activity in the soluble supernatant was due equally to the two forms of glutathione transferase B (100 pmol.min⁻.mg protein⁻¹), glutathione transferases AA, A, C and E being unreactive. The activity of purified glutathione transferase B was about 5-times that expected from the activity of the soluble supernatant. Complex enzyme kinetics were obtained suggestive of substrate inhibition.     

β-Turn conformations in crystal structures of model peptides containing α,α-Di-n-propylglycine and α,α-Di-n-butylglycine

The crystal state conformations of three peptides containing the α,α-dialkylated residues. α,α-di-n-propylglycine (Dpg) and α,α-di-n-butylglycine (Dbg), have been established by x-ray diffraction. Boc-Ala-Dpg-Alu-OMe (I) and Boc-Ala-Dbg-Ala-OMe (III) adopt distorted type II β-turn conformations with Ala (1) and Dpg/Dbg (2) as the corner residues. In both peptides the conformational angles at the Dxg residue (I: ? = 66.2°, ψ = 19.3°; III: ? = 66.5°. ψ = 21.1°) deviate appreciably from ideal values for the i + 2 residue in a type II β-turn. In both peptides the observed (N…O) distances between the Boc CO and Ala (3) NH groups are far too long (1: 3.44 Å: III: 3.63 Å) for an intramolecular 4 → 1 hydrogen bond. Boc-Ala-Dpg-Ata-NHMe (II) crystallizes with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. Both molecules HA and HB adopt consecutive β-turn (type III-III in HA and type III-I in IIB) or incipient 3₁₀-helical structures, stabilized by two intramolecular 4 → 1 hydrogen bonds. In all four molecules the bond angle N-C^α-C′ (τ) at the Dxg residues are ≥ 110°. The observation of conformational angles in the helical region of ?,ψ space at these residues is consistent with theoretical predictions. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.