Translation termination in human mitochondrial ribosomes

Mitochondria are ubiquitous and essential organelles for all nucleated cells of higher eukaryotes. They contain their own genome [mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA)], and this autosomally replicating extranuclear DNA encodes a complement of genes whose products are required to couple oxidative phosphorylation. Sequencing of this human mtDNA more than 20?years ago revealed unusual features that included a modified codon usage. Specific deviations from the standard genetic code include recoding of the conventional UGA stop to tryptophan, and, strikingly, the apparent recoding of two arginine triplets (AGA and AGG) to termination signals. This latter reassignment was made because of the absence of cognate mtDNA-encoded tRNAs, and a lack of tRNAs imported from the cytosol. Each of these codons only occurs once and, in both cases, at the very end of an open reading frame. The presence of both AGA and AGG is rarely found in other mammals, and the molecular mechanism that has driven the change from encoding arginine to dictating a translational stop has posed a challenging conundrum. Mitochondria from the majority of other organisms studied use only UAA and UAG, leaving the intriguing question of why human organelles appear to have added the complication of a further two stop codons, AGA and AGG, or have they? In the present review, we report recent data to show that mammalian mitochondria can utilize a -1 frameshift such that only the standard UAA and UAG stop codons are required to terminate the synthesis of all 13 polypeptides.     

Supernumerary proteins of mitochondrial ribosomes

Background

Messenger RNAs encoded by mitochondrial genomes are translated on mitochondrial ribosomes that have unique structure and protein composition compared to prokaryotic and cytoplasmic ribosomes. Mitochondrial ribosomes are a patchwork of core proteins that share homology with prokaryotic ribosomal proteins and new, supernumerary proteins that can be unique to different organisms. In mammals, there are specific supernumerary ribosomal proteins that are not present in other eukaryotes.

Scope of review

Here we discuss the roles of supernumerary proteins in the regulation of mitochondrial gene expression and compare them among different eukaryotic systems. Furthermore, we consider if differences in the structure and organization of mitochondrial genomes may have contributed to the acquisition of mitochondrial ribosomal proteins with new functions.

Major conclusions

The distinct and diverse compositions of mitochondrial ribosomes illustrate the high evolutionary divergence found between mitochondrial genetic systems.

General significance

Elucidating the role of the organism-specific supernumerary proteins may provide a window into the regulation of mitochondrial gene expression through evolution in response to distinct evolutionary paths taken by mitochondria in different organisms. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Frontiers of Mitochondrial Research.     

Proteins of mammalian mitochondrial ribosomes.

The bovine mitochondrial system is being developed as a model system for studies on mammalian mitochondrial ribosomes. Information is emerging on the structural organization and RNA binding properties of proteins in these mitochondrial ribosomes. Unexpectedly, these ribosomes appear to interact directly with GTP, via a high affinity binding site on the small subunit. Despite major differences in their RNA content and physical properties, mammalian mitochondrial and cytoplasmic ribosomes contain about the same number of proteins. The proteins in each kind of ribosome have a similar size distribution, and both sets are entirely coded by nuclear genes, raising the possibility that these different ribosomes may contain the same set of proteins. Comparison of bovine mitochondrial and cytoplasmic r-proteins by co-electrophoresis in two-dimensional gels reveals that most of the cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins are more basic than the mitochondrial ribosomal proteins, and that none are co-migratory with mitochondrial ribosomal proteins, suggesting that the proteins in the two ribosomes are different. To exclude the possibility that the electrophoretic differences result only from post-translational modification of otherwise identical proteins, antibodies against several proteins from the large subunit of bovine mitochondrial ribosomes were tested against cytoplasmic ribosomes by solid phase radioimmunoassay and against cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins on Western blots. The lack of cross-reaction of these antibodies with cytoplasmic r-proteins suggests that mitochondrial ribosomal proteins have different primary structures and thus are most likely encoded by a separate set of nuclear genes.     

Dual function of GTPBP6 in biogenesis and recycling of human mitochondrial ribosomes

Translation and ribosome biogenesis in mitochondria require auxiliary factors that ensure rapid and accurate synthesis of mitochondrial proteins. Defects in translation are associated with oxidative phosphorylation deficiency and cause severe human diseases, but the exact roles of mitochondrial translation-associated factors are not known. Here we identify the functions of GTPBP6, a homolog of the bacterial ribosome-recycling factor HflX, in human mitochondria. Similarly to HflX, GTPBP6 facilitates the dissociation of ribosomes in vitro and in vivo. In contrast to HflX, GTPBP6 is also required for the assembly of mitochondrial ribosomes. GTPBP6 ablation leads to accumulation of late assembly intermediate(s) of the large ribosomal subunit containing ribosome biogenesis factors MTERF4, NSUN4, MALSU1 and the GTPases GTPBP5, GTPBP7 and GTPBP10. Our data show that GTPBP6 has a dual function acting in ribosome recycling and biogenesis. These findings contribute to our understanding of large ribosomal subunit assembly as well as ribosome recycling pathway in mitochondria.     

Physiochemical properties of rat liver mitochondrial ribosomes

In the present study, the physiochemical properties of rat liver mitochondrial ribosomes were examined and compared with Escherichia coli ribosomes. The sedimentation and translational diffusion coefficients as well as the molecular weight and buoyant density of rat mitochondrial ribosomes were determined. Sedimentation coefficients were established using the time-derivative algorithm (Philo, J. S. (2000) Anal. Biochem. 279, 151-163). The sedimentation coefficients of the intact monosome, large subunit, and small subunit were 55, 39, and 28 S, respectively. Mitochondrial ribosomes had a particle composition of 75% protein and 25% RNA. The partial specific volume was 0.688 ml/g, as determined from the protein and RNA composition. The buoyant density of formaldehyde-fixed ribosomes in cesium chloride was 1.41 g/cm(3). The molecular masses of mitochondrial and E. coli ribosomes determined by static light-scattering experiments were 3.57 +/- 0.14 MDa and 2.49 +/- 0.06 MDa, respectively. The diffusion coefficient obtained from dynamic light-scattering measurements was 1.10 +/- 0.01 x 10(-7) cm(2) s(-1) for mitochondrial ribosomes and 1.72 +/- 0.03 x 10(-7) cm(2) s(-1) for the 70 S E. coli monosome. The hydration factor determined from these hydrodynamic parameters were 4.6 g of water/g of ribosome and 1.3 g/g for mitochondrial and E. coli ribosomes, respectively. A calculated hydration factor of 3.3 g/g for mitochondrial ribosomes was also obtained utilizing a calculated molecular mass and the Svedberg equation. These measurements of solvation suggest that ribosomes are highly hydrated structures. They are also in agreement with current models depicting ribosomes as porous structures containing numerous gaps and tunnels.     

Protein composition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mitochondrial ribosomes

Protein composition of mitochondrial ribosomes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was analysed by two-dimensional electrophoresis. The small (37S) mitoribosomal subunit contains 36 different polypeptides with molecular weights ranging from 10,000 to 60,000. The large (50S) subunit is composed of 41 proteins with molecular weights from 10,000 to 43,000. The molecular weights of mitoribosomal small and large subunits are 1.85 MDa and 2.35 MDa, respectively. Proteins represent 60-62% and 42-45% of the total mass of 37S and 50S subunits respectively. On the basis of the protein content and molecular weights of individual proteins we conclude that all mitoribosomal proteins are present in the mitoribosome in equimolar proportions.     

Bovine mitochondrial ribosomes. Elongation factor specificity

The activity of bovine mitochondrial ribosomes with elongation factors from a variety of sources including the mitochondria of lower eukaryotes, chloroplasts, Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, and the eukaryotic cell cytoplasm has been investigated. Bovine mitochondrial ribosomes are active with homologous mitochondrial elongation factor (EF)-G but display no activity with the mitochondrial or chloroplast translocases from the lower eukaryote Euglena gracilis, with Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis EF-G or with cytoplasmic EF-2. In contrast to the results obtained with the translocases, E. coli EF-Tu, B. subtilis EF-Tu, and Euglena chloroplast EF-Tu all function to a significant extent on the mitochondrial ribosomes. Cytoplasmic EF-1 has barely detectable activity on the animal mitochondrial ribosomes. The polymerization of phenylalanine by these ribosomes is dependent on poly(U), displays a rather broad Mg2+ optimum around 12 mM, and proceeds most rapidly at low monovalent ion concentrations.     

Interaction of bovine mitochondrial ribosomes with messenger RNA

The gene for subunit II of cytochrome oxidase (CoII) from bovine mitochondria has been cloned behind a T7 promoter and the corresponding mRNA synthesized in vitro. The RNA transcribed from this vector has a single nucleotide 5' to the start AUG and, thus, corresponds closely to the native mRNA. It binds to the small 28 S ribosomal subunit of bovine mitochondria but not to the large (39 S) subunit or to 55 S ribosomes. The binding occurs readily in the absence of auxiliary initiation factors or initiator tRNA. The complex formed appears to contain 1 mRNA/28 S subunit. The observed binding is specific for mRNA since neither tRNA nor ribosomal RNA can act as competitive inhibitors. The interaction of the mRNA with the 28 S subunit does not require an AUG codon near the 5' end and constructs containing 5' leaders of more than 100 nucleotides still bind efficiently. About 5% of the bound mRNA is protected from digestion by T1 RNase. The protected fragments do not arise from a specific region of the mRNA since they hybridize to several restriction fragments of the cloned CoII gene.     

Mechanism of mRNA binding to bovine mitochondrial ribosomes

The binding of mRNA to bovine mitochondrial ribosomes was investigated using triplet codons, homopolymers and heteropolymers of various lengths, and human mitochondrial mRNAs. In the absence of initiation factors and initiator tRNA, mitochondrial ribosomes do not bind triplet codons (AUG and UUU) or homopolymers (oligo(U] shorter than about 10 nucleotides. The RNA binding domain on the 28 S mitoribosomal subunit spans approximately 80 nucleotides of the mRNA, judging from the size of the fragments of poly(U,G) and natural mRNAs protected from RNase T1 digestion by this subunit, but the major binding interaction with the ribosome appears to occur over a 30-nucleotide stretch. Human mitochondrial mRNAs coding for subunits II and III of cytochrome c oxidase and subunit 1 of the NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) were used in studying in detail the binding of mRNA to the small subunit of bovine mitochondrial ribosomes. We have determined that these mRNAs have considerable secondary structure in their 5'-terminal regions and that the initiation codon of each mRNA is sequestered in a stem structure. Little mRNA was bound to ribosomes in a manner conferring protection of the 5' termini from RNase T1 digestion, under standard conditions supporting the binding of artificial templates, but such binding was greatly stimulated by the addition of a mitochondrial extract. Initiation factors and tRNAs from Escherichia coli were unable to stimulate the 5' terminus protected binding of these mRNA molecules, demonstrating a requirement for homologous factors. Our results strongly suggest that mitochondrial initiation factors are required for the proper recognition and melting of the secondary structure in the 5'-terminal region of mitochondrial mRNAs, as a prerequisite for initiation of protein synthesis in mammalian mitochondria.     

Isolation and physiochemical properties of protein-rich nematode mitochondrial ribosomes

In the present study, mitochondrial ribosomes of the nematode Ascaris suum were isolated and their physiochemical properties were compared to ribosomes of Escherichia coli. The sedimentation coefficient and buoyant density of A. suum mitochondrial ribosomes were determined. The sedimentation coefficient of the intact monosome was about 55 S. The buoyant density of formaldehyde-fixed ribosomes in cesium chloride was 1.40 g/cm(3), which suggests that the nematode mitoribosomes have a much higher protein composition than other mitoribosomes. The diffusion coefficients obtained from dynamic light scattering measurements were (1.48 +/- 0.04) x 10(-)(7) cm(2) s(-)(1) for 55 S mitoribosomes and (1.74 +/- 0.04) x 10(-)(7) cm(2) s(-)(1) for the 70 S E. coli monosome. The diameter of mitoribosomes was measured by dynamic light-scattering analysis and electron microscopy. Though the nematode mitoribosome has a larger size than the bacterial ribosome, it does not differ significantly in size from mammalian mitoribosomes.