Characteristics of the factors that suppress and stimulate interferon production

A repressor of interferon production is contained in the hyaloplasm of the chick embryo fibroblast cells in the state of hyporeactivity. A factor stimulating interferon production (FSIP) was found in the hyaloplasm of the cells subjected to single or double induction with poly (pI) x poly (pC) followed by exposure to actinomycin D. Both preparations were of the protein nature and possessed high biological activity. They repressed or stimulatd interferon production at a dilution of 1:512-1:1024. The preparations had tissue and inductor specificity, did not affect the Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus and interferon antiviral activity. Unlike the repressor, the FSIP proved to be thermolabile and pH-sensitive in acid media. The half lives of the repressor and stimulator were about 10 and 5 hours respectively.     

The state of hyporeactivity in interferon production: localization and partial purification of the factor repressing the interferon production

The hyporeactivity factor in interferon production by L-929 cells designated IRP (interferon repressing protein) has been studied. In particular, its localization and methods of its purification have been studied. The kinetics of IRP accumulation by producing cells correlate with the development of hyporeactivity condition. Most of IRP is localized in cell sap and in ribosomal fraction in evidence to regulatory role of repressor at the level of interferon mRNA translation. A 100-fold increase in repressor activity was achieved by IRP concentration by ammonium sulfate precipitation. IRP as well as interferon have been shown to possess high affinity to polyU sepharose. The preparations of IRP and interferon concentrated by ammonium sulfate precipitation were subsequently purified by fractioning in a polyI sepharose column. A 10,000-fold (6 x 10(4) U/mg) purification was achieved for IRP and 250-fold (10(4) U/mg) for interferon.     

Comparative analysis of the action of an interferon inducer in in vitro and in vivo systems]

Investigation of interferon inductor (poly IC) in vitro (chick embryon fibroblasts) and in vivo (mice) showed that the main parameters of the preparation effect, i. e. induction of interferon and development of resistance to viruses are as a whole quite comparable. The phenomenon of hyporeactivity in the both systems was reproduced on repeated use of the inductor. At the same time significant differences in the stimulating effect of DEAE-dextran were registered. The merits and demerits of the in vitro system for using in studies on antiviral drugs of the above type are discussed.     

Control of Interferon Synthesis: Effect of Diethyl-aminoethyl-Dextran on Induction by Polyinosinic-Polycytidylic Acid

Interferon production in cultures of rabbit kidney cells (RKC) stimulated with 10 to 250 mug of polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I.poly C) per ml peaked at 3 to 4 hr after the exposure of cells to inducer and rapidly declined thereafter. On the other hand, RKC stimulated with poly I.poly C (10 or 2 mug/ml) in the presence of diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-dextran (100 or 20 mug/ml, respectively) produced a protracted interferon response, with the release of interferon continuing for over 24 hr. The kinetics of interferon production in RKC stimulated with lower concentrations of the mixture of poly I.poly C and DEAE-dextran were similar to the response produced by poly I.poly C alone (10 to 250 mug/ml). Only the responses that terminated early were paradoxically enhanced by treatment with low doses of actinomycin D or with cycloheximide. Cells stimulated with 50 mug of poly I.poly C/ml showed hyporesponsiveness to a second interferon induction with poly I.poly C when restimulated 7 hr after primary induction. This hyporesponsiveness could be overcome by restimulating with higher concentrations of the poly I.poly C-DEAE-dextran complex. The results are compatible with the hypothesis that the early termination of interferon production and hyporesponsiveness to repeated induction with poly I.poly C are due to a cellular repressor exerting negative control on interferon synthesis, and that the increased cellular uptake of poly I.poly C in the presence of DEAE-dextran may effectively neutralize the repressor. These results also suggested that the often observed different kinetics and the varied effects of inhibitors of ribonucleic acid or protein synthesis on interferon responses in various cells and in cells stimulated with different inducers (such as with viruses as compared with polynucleotides) need not imply the existence of fundamentally different mechanisms of interferon production.     

Interferon response in normal and Aleutian disease virus-infected mink.

Studies were done to determine whether differences in interferon production are responsible for the resistance of pastel mink to Aleutian disease. The abilities of normal pastel and sapphire mink to produce interferon when inoculated with either Newcastle disease virus or a synthetic polyribonucleotide, poly (I):poly (C), were identical, even to the production of a novel, acid-labile interferon. The resistance of pastel mink to Aleutian disease did not correlate with interferon production, because neither sapphire nor pastel mink produced detectable amounts of interferon when infected with either the Pullman strain of Aleutian disease virus (ADV) or the highly virulent Utah I strain. Sapphire mink infected with the Pullman strain responded normally to poly (I):poly (C) early in the course of the disease, but interferon production was impaired late, when the mink were hypergammaglobulinemic and had renal, vascular, and hepatic lesions. These data suggest that ADV Pullman neither stimulates nor interferes with interferon production in infected mink and may represent a mechanism whereby ADV can more readily establish infection.     

Interferon Induction in Rabbit Cells Irradiated with UV Light

UV irradiation of a continuous line of rabbit kidney cells (RK13) was used as a tool for the study of the mechanism of interferon induction. Irradiation of cells prior to their exposure to Newcastle disease virus (NDV) resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in interferon production. The inhibition of total cellular RNA synthesis by UV irradiation in uninduced cultures was similar to the inactivation curve of interferon production in NDV-induced cultures. In contrast, the production of interferon with polyinosinate-polycytidylate (poly[I].poly [C]) paradoxically was enhanced in cells irradiated with a wide range of doses of UV. However, in cells stimulated with poly(I).poly(C) and "superinduced" by the sequential addition of cycloheximide and actinomycin D, the rate of inactivation of interferon production by UV light was similar to that observed with NDV. These results are not inconsistent with the idea that both poly(I).poly(C) and NDV stimulate the same interferon gene(s), but indicate that the mechanism controlling its expression may be different for each inducer.     

Induction of Interferon and Erythropoietic Differentiation in Cells Transformed by Friend Virus

Two lines of Friend virus (FV)-transformed mouse spleen cells have been analyzed in respect to their interferon production capacity: neither F4 cells, which liberate infectious FV when kept under tissue culture conditions, nor the thymidine kinase-deficient B8 cells, which do not produce significant amounts of FV, release detectable amounts of autogenous interferon into cell supernatants. However, interferon is produced in these cells in amounts comparable to that in L-929 cells when interferon induction is initiated with UV-inactivated Newcastle disease virus. Conversely poly(I) · poly(C), a potent interferon inducer in L-929 cells, proved ineffective in this capacity in F4 or B8 cells. When erythropoietic differentiation is induced in these cells by dimethyl sulfoxide, no autogenous interferon production occurs, but with NDV-induction a four- to fivefold increase of interferon production is observed. A similar elevation of interferon production is achieved during 5-bromodeoxyuridine stimulation of differentiation in the thymidine kinase-deficient B8 cells. The refractiveness against poly(I) · poly(C) displayed in unstimulated cells is not overcome at any stage of differentiation, indicating major differences of Newcastle disease virus and poly(I) · poly(C) induction mechanisms.     

Cellular Mechanisms of Interferon Production

Rabbit kidney cell cultures stimulated with either double-stranded polyinosinate-polycytidylate (poly I:poly C) or with ultraviolet-irradiated Newcastle disease virus (UV-NDV) produce two types of interferon response, designated "early" and "late," respectively. The early response is suppressed by inhibitors of RNA or protein synthesis and is therefore thought to represent de novo synthesis of interferon. Circumstantial evidence suggested that this interferon response is regulated by a translation control mechanism. Late interferon production with poly I:poly C only took place in the presence of inhibitors of RNA or protein synthesis. The late interferon is therefore likely to be derived by the activation of an interferon precursor. The stimulation of late poly I:poly C-induced interferon production by cycloheximide suggested the existence of a second, posttranslational level of control of interferon production. This posttranslation control seems to be activated by interferon. UV-NDV can probably suppress the synthesis of the posttranslation inhibitory protein, and therefore it stimulates a late interferon response in the absence of inhibitors of RNA or protein synthesis. It is postulated that both the translation and posttranslation inhibitor participate in the development of a cellular refractory state to repeated interferon stimulation. The picture of interferon which emerges from this study is one of a heterogenous class of proteins whose production is controlled by cellular repressors acting at various levels.     

Mitogenic effect of double-stranded RNA in human fibroblasts: role of autogenous interferon

The synthetic double-stranded RNA polyinosinate-polycytidylate [poly(I).poly(C)] was mitogenic in cultures of human foreskin fibroblasts, as demonstrated by a stimulation of 3H-thymidine incorporation and an increase in cell density. Poly(I).poly(C) is a potent inducer of interferon (IFN)-beta in human fibroblasts. Single-stranded poly(l) or poly(C) were not mitogenic in human fibroblasts and did not stimulate IFN production. Antiserum to interferon (IFN)-beta, added to poly(I).poly(C)-stimulated cultures in order to neutralize endogenously generated IFN, markedly amplified the mitogenic action. Under similar experimental conditions, antiserum to IFN-beta did not enhance the mitogenic action of epidermal growth factor (EGF). Dexamethasone enhanced the mitogenic action of poly(I).poly(C) in a manner similar to antiserum against IFN-beta. This effect of dexamethasone correlated with its marked inhibitory action on poly(I).poly(C)-stimulated IFN production. Together with the results of other related studies, these findings support the notion of an evolutionary link between the generation of a mitogenic signal and IFN induction. In addition, these results support the concept that autocrine secretion of IFN-beta can exert negative feedback control of cell proliferation.     

Effect of nucleosides on interferon production and development of antiviral state induced by poly I.poly C.

Effect of nucleosides both on induction of antiviral state in chick embryo cells (CEC) or rabbit kidney cells (RK13) and on interferon production in RK13 or mouse fibroblast cells (L cells) by polyriboinosinic-polyribocytidylic acid (poly I.poly C) was studied. Addition of inosine or a fifty-fifty mixture of inosine and uridine at a final concentration of 0.1 mM to 10 mM to a growth medium enhanced development of antiviral state in CEC. The nucleoside effect was also observed in RK13 at 0.1 mM but not at a concentration higher than 1 mM. Interferon production in RK13 by superinduction (sequential treatment with metabolic inhibitors after exposure to poly I.poly C) was enhanced 1.5- to 4.0-fold by addition of the nucleoside mixture to the growth medium. When RK13 was pretreated with 10 units per ml of interferon and then superinduced by inhibitors, the enhancing effect of nucleosides on interferon production was not observed. Interferon production in L cells was potentiated a little by addition of 1 mM of the nucleoside mixture to the growth medium. The effect of nucleoside was not observed when the nucleosides were added after exposure to poly I.poly C. The nucleoside effect may be applicable for production of high titered interferon.     

Induction of interferon and erythropoietic differentiation in cells transformed by Friend virus.

Two lines of Friend virus (FV)-transformed mouse spleen cells have been analyzed in respect to their interferon production capacity: neither F4 cells, which liberate infectious FV when kept under tissue culture conditions, nor the thymidine kinase-deficient B8 cells, which do not produce significant amounts of FV, release detectable amounts of autogenous interferon into cell supernatants. However, interferon is produced in these cells in amounts comparable to that in L-929 cells when interferon induction is initiated with UV-inactivated Newcastle disease virus. Conversely poly(I)-poly(C), a potent interferon inducer in L-929 cells, proved ineffective in this capacity in F4 or B8 cells. When erythropoietic differentiation is induced in these cells by dimethyl sulfoxide, no autogenous interferon production occurs, but with NDV-induction a four- to fivefode increase of interferon production is observed. A similar elevation of interferon production is achieved during 5-bromodeoxyuridine stimulation of differentiation in the thymidine kinase-deficient B8 cells. The refractiveness against poly(I)-poly(C) displayed in unstimulated cells is not overcome at any stage of differentiation, indicating major differences of Newcastle disease virus and poly(I)-poly(C) induction mechanisms.     

Effect of modulation of the production of interferon by L-929 cells treated with theophylline

The specific inhibitor of cAMP phosphodiesterase theophylline has been shown to evoke in L929 cells 2.3-fold induction of 2-5A-synthetase activity and 3.5-fold superinduction of the same enzyme activity while acting in combination with actinomycin D. It has been shown also that temporal coincidence of 2-5A-synthetase induction with the active period of interferon production resulted in 8-16 times decrease in the level of interferon production. The result was supported by the experiments of superinduced cells (containing the high stable level of 2-5A-synthetase) fusion with monolayer of poly(I).poly(C)-induced L929 cells (taken at the start of interferon production). In this case the production of interferon was dramatically decreased in comparison with the control. Possible role of 2-5A-synthetase in regulation of interferon production is discussed.     

Sepharose-bound poly (I)-poly (C): interaction with cells and interferon production.

Poly(I).poly(C) covalently coupled to a matrix by one point fixation through its 3′ terminal stimulated both antiviral activity and interferon production in primary rabbit kidney (PRK) cells. This effect could not be accounted for by free polynucleotide released from the matrix into the medium. Penetration of the polynucleotide into the cells does not appear to be necessary for interferon production. A limited amount of matrix-bound poly(I).poly(C) was associated with the cells. Since it was sensitive to extraneous ribonuclease treatment, this poly(I).poly(C) was believed to be localized at the cell surface. Preliminary findings suggest that the binding of the polynucleotide to the cell is not directly proportional to the amount of interferon induced.     

Mink parvoviruses and interferons: in vitro studies.

Although interferons can inhibit the replication of a number of viruses, little is known about their ability to inhibit parvovirus replication. Therefore, in vitro experiments were done to determine if Aleutian disease virus and mink enteritis virus, two autonomously replicating mink parvoviruses, induced interferon, were sensitive to the effects of interferon, or inhibited the production of interferon. The results indicated that these parvoviruses neither induced nor were sensitive to the effects of interferon. Furthermore, preexisting parvovirus infections did not inhibit poly(I).poly(C)-induced interferon production. This independence from the interferon system may, therefore, be a general property of the autonomously replicating parvoviruses.     

Enhancement of Interferon Production in a Mouse Cell Line, a High-Yielding Source of Mouse Interferon

Priming with interferon prior to poly(I).poly(C) treatment of a mouse cell line, MO 57/2, followed by sequential administration of metabolic inhibitors, resulted in the production of high yields of mouse interferon.     

Post-Transcriptional Control of Interferon Synthesis

Low to moderate doses of cycloheximide had a stimulatory effect on interferon production in rabbit kidney cell cultures treated with double-stranded polyinosinate-polycytidylate (poly I:poly C). A very marked stimulation occurred in the presence of a dose of cycloheximide inhibiting amino acid incorporation into total cellular protein by about 75%. Higher doses of cycloheximide caused a shift in interferon release towards later intervals and a gradual decrease in the overall degree of stimulation. An even greater increase in the amount of interferon produced was observed if cells were treated with cycloheximide for only 3 to 4 hr immediately after their exposure to poly I:poly C. Under the latter conditions, a rapid burst of interferon production occurred after the reversal of cycloheximide action. Treatment with a high dose of actinomycin D before the reversal of cycloheximide action caused a further increase and a marked prolongation of interferon production. It is postulated that inhibitors of protein synthesis suppress the accumulation of a cellular regulatory protein (repressor) which interacts with the interferon messenger ribonucleic acid mRNA and thereby prevents its translation. Therefore, active interferon mRNA can apparently accumulate in rabbit kidney cells which, after exposure to poly I:poly C, are kept in the presence of an inhibitor of protein synthesis. Some of this accumulated interferon mRNA can be translated during a partial block of cellular protein synthesis, but its most efficient translation occurs after the reversal of the action of the protein synthesis inhibitor.     

Interferon-inducing and antiviral effects of inosiplex in combination with high-molecular interferon inducers

It has been shown that the immunostimulant inosiplex (IP) is capable of inducing interferon production in mice and of stimulating interferon induction by high-molecular inducers. The combined use of IP and poly (G)-poly (C) or dsRNA (RFf2) leads to a longer interferon circulation in the blood. All the combination schemes ensuring the effect of interferon production prolongation were tested for anti-viral activity. The prophylactic administration of the drugs permitted the attainment in mice of the increased resistance to experimental influenza.     

Characterization of interferons produced by peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy subjects in response to Corynebacterium parvum or poly I: poly C

The biological significance of acid labile interferon alpha is presently unknown. We examined the putative production of acid labile interferon in vitro from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells induced with Corynebacterium parvum or poly I: poly C. Both agents induced up to 1200 IU/ml interferon, and the interferon was 80 to 90% acid labile. The interferons were typed by antibody neutralization of their antiviral activity. Contrary to previous reports, C. parvum induced predominantly interferon gamma, which is normally acid labile, whereas poly I: poly C induced an acid labile interferon alpha activity with characteristics similar to those of acid labile interferon alpha reported in serum in certain human diseases.     

Immunochemical measurement of conformational heterogeneity of poly(inosinic acid).

Several pure poly(I) preparations differed in: (a) their complement fixation reactivity with anti-poly(I) antiserum; (b) their ability to bind to a solid-phase anti-poly(I) antibody-Sepharose column; (c) their ability to inactivate serum complement; and (d) their reactivity with purified antibodies to double-stranded RNA. In particular, poly(I) samples that could induce interferon production differed from non-inducer poly(I)s; the inducers reacted weakly with anti-poly(I) antiserum and were the only ones that reacted with antibodies to double-stranded RNA. One inducer poly(I) did not inactivate complement, and differed from non-inducer poly(I) in quantitative aspects of poly(I) . poly(C) formation with varying amounts of poly(C). An additional type of poly(I) preparation reacted poorly with anti-poly(I) antiserum, did not react with anti-double-stranded-RNA antibodies and failed to induce interferon production. The varying forms of poly(I) were not interconvertible by boiling and rapid chilling. These results indicate that several different stable structural forms of poly(I) may result from a standardized synthetic procedure.