A dominant role for DNA secondary structure in forming hypersensitive structures in chromatin

Previous work has suggested that potential information in DNA secondary structure might be used by cells to define DNAase I- and S1-sensitive chromatin structures associated with promoter and terminator regions. To test this hypothesis, supercoiled pBR322 was cotransfected into L cells. For the majority of transfected clones supercoil-induced S1-sensitive sites in pure pBR322 DNA are also S1-sensitive in L-cell nuclei. These results suggest that the potential of certain DNA sequences to form specific secondary structures in chromatin can be a dominant characteristic. A recombinant chicken β^A-lobin supercoiled plasmid was reconstituted in vitro with histones. The reconstituted chromatin also retained the ability to form S1-sensitive sites. Evidence suggests that DNA sequences capable of forming S1-sensitive sites in supercoiled plasmids may bind nucleosomes poorly after reconstitution with histones.     

Xenopus nucleoplasmin: egg vs. oocyte

Nucleoplasmin has been purified from either oocytes or unfertilized eggs of the frog, Xenopus laevis. We find that the pentameric form of egg nucleoplasmin exhibits an apparent molecular mass approximately 15 000 daltons larger than its oocyte counterpart upon sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-acrylamide gel electrophoresis. Egg nucleoplasmin monomers are more heterogeneous, substantially more acidic, and overall larger in apparent molecular weight than oocyte nucleoplasmin monomers when analyzed by isoelectric focusing or SDS gel electrophoresis. Protease digestions indicate that the structural differences between egg and oocyte nucleoplasmin are primarily confined to the N-terminal halves of the proteins. The structural diversity observed is accompanied by a difference in the ability of nucleoplasmin from the two sources to act as a nucleosome assembly agent in vitro. Egg nucleoplasmin efficiently promotes the formation of nucleosomes onto circular pBR322 DNA in vitro at physiological ionic strength and at physiological histone:DNA ratios, while oocyte nucleoplasmin is markedly deficient in serving as an in vitro chromatin assembly agent under all conditions which we have tested. Treatment of egg nucleoplasmin in vitro with alkaline phosphatase demonstrates that the structural diversity between egg and oocyte nucleoplasmin results primarily from extensive additional phosphorylation of the egg protein. The relevance of nucleoplasmin phosphorylation in leading to differences in the chromatin assembly activity of this protein both in vitro and in vivo is considered.     

Nuclear reassemblyin vitro is independent of nucleosome/chromatin assembly

It was show11 that nuclear reassembly was induced by small pieces of DNA fragments in cell-free extracts ofXenopus. In an attempt to learn the relationship between the nuclear reassembly and nucleosome/chromatin assembly, limited amounts of CM-Cellulose are used to eliminate the capacity of the egg extract S-150 to assemble chromatin. while the forming of nucleosomes is checked with DNA supercoiling by plasmid DNA pBR322 incubated in the extract, and further analysed by micrococcal nuclease digestion. This depleted extract is then used to induce nuclear reassembly around demembraned sperms with membrane vesicles. It is found that CM-Cellulose depletes histones H2A and H2B efficiently and blocks the assembly of nucleosomes, the demembraned sperms are yet reconstituted into nuclei in the treated S-150, although the chromatin in reassembled nuclei does not produce protected DNA fragments when digested with micrococcal nuclease. It suggests that in the cell-free system ofXenopus, DNA can be formed into nuclei without assembly of nucleosomes or chromatin.     

Nuclear reassembly in vitro is independent of nucleosome/chromatin assembly

Ｃｈｒｏｍａｔｉｎｉｓｍａｄｅｕｐｏｆｒｅｇｕｌａｒｌｙｓｐａｃｅｄｓｕｂｕｎｉｔｓ,ｎｕｃｌｅｏｓｏｍｅｓ.Ｉｎｅｕｋａｒｙｏｔｉｃｃｅｌｌｓ,ｃｈｒｏｍａｔｉｎｉｓａｓｓｅｍｂｌｅｄｉｍｍｅｄｉａｔｅｄｌｙａｆｔｅｒＤＮＡｒｅｐｌｉｃａｔｉｏｎ,ｂｕｔｉｎｃｅｌｌｆｒｅｅｓｙｓｔｅｍｓ,ｉｔｃａｎｂｅａｓｓｅｍｂｌｅｄｉｎｄｅｐｅｎｄｅｎｔｏｆＤＮＡｒｅｐｌｉｃａｔｉｏｎｗｈｅｎｅｘｏｇｅｎｏｕｓＤＮＡｗａｓａｄｄｅｄｔｏｅｇｇｏｒｏｏｃｙｔｅｅｘｔｒａｃｔｓｏｆＸｅｎｏｐｕｓｌａｅｖｉｓ.Ｔｈｅ…     

Nuclear reassembly in vitro is independent of nucleosome/chromatin assembly

It was show11 that nuclear reassembly was induced by small pieces of DNA fragments in cell-free extracts ofXenopus. In an attempt to learn the relationship between the nuclear reassembly and nucleosome/chromatin assembly, limited amounts of CM-Cellulose are used to eliminate the capacity of the egg extract S-150 to assemble chromatin. while the forming of nucleosomes is checked with DNA supercoiling by plasmid DNA pBR322 incubated in the extract, and further analysed by micrococcal nuclease digestion. This depleted extract is then used to induce nuclear reassembly around demembraned sperms with membrane vesicles. It is found that CM-Cellulose depletes histones H2A and H2B efficiently and blocks the assembly of nucleosomes, the demembraned sperms are yet reconstituted into nuclei in the treated S-150, although the chromatin in reassembled nuclei does not produce protected DNA fragments when digested with micrococcal nuclease. It suggests that in the cell-free system ofXenopus, DNA can be formed into nuclei without assembly of nucleosomes or chromatin. Projrrt supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 39730240)     

Nucleosome assembly in mammalian cell extracts before and after DNA replication.

Protein-free DNA in a cytosolic extract supplemented with SV40 large T-antigen (T-Ag), is assembled into chromatin structure when nuclear extract is added. This assembly was monitored by topoisomer formation, micrococcal nuclease digestion and psoralen crosslinking of the DNA. Plasmids containing SV40 sequences (ori- and ori+) were assembled into chromatin with similar efficiencies whether T-Ag was present or not. Approximately 50-80% of the number of nucleosomes in vivo could be assembled in vitro; however, the kinetics of assembly differed on replicated and unreplicated molecules. In replicative intermediates, nucleosomes were observed on both the pre-replicated and post-replicated portions. We conclude that the extent of nucleosome assembly in mammalian cell extracts is not dependent upon DNA replication, in contrast to previous suggestions. However, the highly sensitive psoralen assay revealed that DNA replication appears to facilitate precise folding of DNA in the nucleosome.     

Preferential positioning of nucleosomes on pBR322 as evaluated via Fourier transform of data from electron microscopy

Nucleosome positioning on pBR322 DNA has been evaluated by electron microscopy visualization, after psoralen cross-linking. The distribution function of nucleosomes on pBR322 DNA has been calculated analyzing the data of the electron microscopy via Fourier transform. This function shows definite maxima, which indicate differential interactions of the histone octamer to different DNA sequences.     

Chromatin assembly on plasmid DNA in vitro. Apparent spreading of nucleosome alignment from one region of pBR327 by histone H5.

We have found that histone H5 (or H1) induces physiological nucleosome spacings and extensive ordering on some plasmid constructions, but not on others, in a fully defined in vitro system. Plasmid pBR327 containing DNA insertions with lengths close to 300 base-pairs permitted histone H5 to induce a remarkable degree of nucleosome alignment. Seventeen multiples of a unit 210(+/- 4) base-pair repeat, covering the entire plasmid, were detected. Plasmid pBR327, not containing a DNA insert, permitted continuous alignment of only a few nucleosomes. These observations suggest that a necessary requirement in this system for histone H5 (or H1)-induced nucleosome alignment on small (less than 4 kb; 1 kb = 10(3) bases or base-pairs) circular plasmids may be that the total DNA length must be close to an integer multiple of the nucleosome repeat length generated, a type of boundary effect. Consistent with this hypothesis, five deletion constructs of pBR327 (not containing inserts), that spanned 64% of the plasmid, and possessed DNA lengths close to integer multiples of 210 base-pairs, permitted nucleosome alignment by histone H5. We have also found that plasmid length adjustment is not a sufficient condition for nucleosome alignment. For example, plasmids pBR322 and pUC18 did not permit nucleosome alignment when adjusted to near-integer multiples of 210 base-pairs. Also, for pBR327 that contained a length-adjusted deletion in one particular region, appreciable nucleosome alignment no longer occurred. These data suggest that a contiguous approximately 800 base-pair region of pBR327, interrupted in pBR322 and not present in pUC18, can nucleate histone H5-induced nucleosome alignment, which can then spread to adjacent chromatin. Supporting this idea, a positioned five-nucleosome array appears to originate in the required region. Additionally, on a larger (6.9 kb) plasmid construction, the "chromatin organizing region" of pBR327 and adjacent DNA on one side of it exhibited preferred H5-induced nucleosome alignment.     

DNA sequence alterations affect nucleosome array formation of the chicken ovalbumin gene

The role of the large amount (more than half of the genome) of noncoding DNA in higher organisms is not well understood. DNA evolved to function in the context of chromatin, and the possibility exists that some of the noncoding DNA serves to influence chromatin structure and function. In this age of genomics and bioinformatics, genomic DNA sequences are being searched for informational content beyond the known genetic code. The discovery that period-10 non-T, A/T, G (VWG) triplets are among the most abundant motifs in human genomic DNA suggests that they may serve some function in higher organisms. In this paper, we provide direct evidence that the regular oscillation of period-10 VWG that occurs in the chicken ovalbumin gene sequence with a dinucleosome-like period facilitates nucleosome array formation. Using a linker histone-dependent in vitro chromatin assembly system that spontaneously aligns nucleosomes into a physiological array, we show that nucleosomes tend to avoid DNA regions with low period-10 VWG counts. This avoidance leads to the formation of an array with a nucleosome repeat equal to half the period value of the oscillation in period-10 VWG, as determined by Fourier analysis. Two different half-period deletions in the wild-type DNA sequence altered the nucleosome array, as predicted computationally. In contrast, a full-period deletion had an insignificant effect on the nucleosome array formed, also consistent with the prediction. An inversion mutation, with no DNA sequences deleted, again altered the nucleosome array formed, as predicted computationally. Hence, a VWG dinucleosome signal is plausible.     

Delineation of the protein module that anchors HMGN proteins to nucleosomes in the chromatin of living cells

Numerous nuclear proteins bind to chromatin by targeting unique DNA sequences or specific histone modifications. In contrast, HMGN proteins recognize the generic structure of the 147-bp nucleosome core particle. HMGNs alter the structure and activity of chromatin by binding to nucleosomes; however, the determinants of the specific interaction of HMGNs with chromatin are not known. Here we use systematic mutagenesis, quantitative fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, fluorescence imaging, and mobility shift assays to identify the determinants important for the specific binding of these proteins to both the chromatin of living cells and to purified nucleosomes. We find that several regions of the protein affect the affinity of HMGNs to chromatin; however, the conserved sequence RRSARLSA, is the sole determinant of the specific interaction of HMGNs with nucleosomes. Within this sequence, each of the 4 amino acids in the R-S-RL motif are the only residues absolutely essential for anchoring HMGN protein to nucleosomes, both in vivo and in vitro. Our studies identify a new chromatin-binding module that specifically recognizes nucleosome cores independently of DNA sequence or histone tail modifications.     

Assembly of transcriptionally active chromatin in vitro: a possible role for topoisomerase II

Some models of in vitro chromatin assembly suggest a biphasic molecular mechanism. The first phase, nucleosome formation, is comprised of the formation of histone-DNA complexes which mature into a canonical nucleosome structure. The second phase represents the process by which these nucleosomes become properly spaced with a regular periodicity on the DNA. In this report, we examine the role of DNA topoisomerases in the latter phase of chromatin assembly. To study this process, we use a Xenopus laevis cell-free extract, which assembles quantitative amounts of chromatin on circular DNA templates, and the type II topoisomerase-specific antitumor drugs VM-26 and endrofloxicin. Our results suggest that nucleosome formation is unaffected by the presence of VM-26 or endrofloxicin. However, periodic spacing of nucleosomes is inhibited significantly by these drugs. In the absence of proper chromatin assembly, circular DNA molecules are processed into nucleoprotein complexes which are transcribed poorly. Taken together, these results indicate that the antitumor drugs VM-26 and endrofloxicin influence gene expression indirectly by blocking the periodic spacing of nucleosomes.     

Multistep chromatin assembly on supercoiled plasmid DNA by nucleosome assembly protein-1 and ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodeling factor

We examine in vitro nucleosome assembly by nucleosome assembly protein-1 (NAP-1) and ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodeling factor (ACF). In contrast to previous studies that used relaxed, circular plasmids as templates, we have found that negatively supercoiled templates reveal the distinct roles of NAP-1 and ACF in histone deposition and the formation of an ordered nucleosomal array. NAP-1 can efficiently deposit histones onto supercoiled plasmids. Furthermore, NAP-1 exhibits a greater affinity for histones H2A-H2B than does naked DNA, but in the presence of H3-H4, H2A-H2B are transferred from NAP-1 to the plasmid templates. These observations underscore the importance of a high affinity between H2A-H2B and NAP-1 for ordered transfer of core histones onto DNA. In addition, recombinant ACF composed of imitation switch and Acf1 can extend closely packed nucleosomes, which suggests that recombinant ACF can mobilize nucleosomes. In the assembly reaction with a supercoiled template, ACF need not be added simultaneously with NAP-1. Regularly spaced nucleosomes are generated even when recombinant ACF is added after core histones are transferred completely onto the DNA. Atomic force microscopy, however, suggests that NAP-1 alone fails to accomplish the formation of fine nucleosomal core particles, which are only formed in the presence of ACF. These results suggest a model for the ordered deposition of histones and the arrangement of nucleosomes during chromatin assembly in vivo.     

Controls of Nucleosome Positioning in the Human Genome

Nucleosomes are important for gene regulation because their arrangement on the genome can control which proteins bind to DNA. Currently, few human nucleosomes are thought to be consistently positioned across cells; however, this has been difficult to assess due to the limited resolution of existing data. We performed paired-end sequencing of micrococcal nuclease-digested chromatin (MNase–seq) from seven lymphoblastoid cell lines and mapped over 3.6 billion MNase–seq fragments to the human genome to create the highest-resolution map of nucleosome occupancy to date in a human cell type. In contrast to previous results, we find that most nucleosomes have more consistent positioning than expected by chance and a substantial fraction (8.7%) of nucleosomes have moderate to strong positioning. In aggregate, nucleosome sequences have 10 bp periodic patterns in dinucleotide frequency and DNase I sensitivity; and, across cells, nucleosomes frequently have translational offsets that are multiples of 10 bp. We estimate that almost half of the genome contains regularly spaced arrays of nucleosomes, which are enriched in active chromatin domains. Single nucleotide polymorphisms that reduce DNase I sensitivity can disrupt the phasing of nucleosome arrays, which indicates that they often result from positioning against a barrier formed by other proteins. However, nucleosome arrays can also be created by DNA sequence alone. The most striking example is an array of over 400 nucleosomes on chromosome 12 that is created by tandem repetition of sequences with strong positioning properties. In summary, a large fraction of nucleosomes are consistently positioned—in some regions because they adopt favored sequence positions, and in other regions because they are forced into specific arrangements by chromatin remodeling or DNA binding proteins.