Natural Transmission and Experimental Models of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Animals

Since the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020, millions of people have contracted SARS-CoV-2 and died from the infection. Several domestic and wild species have contracted the disease as well. From the beginning, scientists have been working to develop vaccines and establish therapies that can prevent disease development and improve the clinical outcome in infected people. To understand various aspects of viral pathogenesis and infection dynamics and to support preclinical evaluation of vaccines and therapeutics, a diverse number of animal species have been evaluated for use as models of the disease and infection in humans. Here, we discuss natural SARS-CoV-2 infection of domestic and captive wild animals, as well as the susceptibility of several species to experimental infection with this virus.

In December 2019, several health facilities in China reported cases of patients with pneumonia of unknown cause. Epidemiologic studies linked the majority of the affected patients with a seafood and wet-animal wholesale market in Wuhan, China.⁹⁴ The patients presented with fever, cough, and chest discomfort; 2 of the first 3 patients recovered, whereas the remaining one died. RNA extracted from the bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid of one patient was sequenced, and a viral sequence that had 85% identity with a SARS-related coronavirus isolated from a bat was identified. The same specimen was used for viral isolation, and the isolate was originally named 2019-nCoV. Genomic and phylogenetic analysis revealed similarities of the newly identified virus with bat coronaviruses and differences from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). The newly isolated virus belongs to a clade within the subgenus Sarbecovirus and differs from SARS-CoV and other SARS-related virus strains. Because the sequence identity in the 1ab open reading frame (conserved replicase domain) was less than 90% between 2019-nCoV and other betacoronaviruses, the virus was classified as a novel betacoronavirus, subgenus Sarbecovirus, family Coronaviridae.⁸⁴ The virus has since been officially renamed by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), with the disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 called COVID-19.¹⁷ As of 13 September 2021, more than 330 million cases of COVID-19 have occurred, and the disease has claimed more than 4.6 million human lives worldwide.⁸⁶SARS-CoV-2 uses angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as the cellular receptor for virus binding.³⁴ The interaction between the virus spike protein and the host-cell ACE2 protein is mediated by the receptor binding domain (RBD) present in the spike protein. The RBD of the spike protein is highly variable among coronaviruses, and is under constant selection pressure. The affinity of the RBD of the spike protein with the cellular receptor determines the host range of coronaviruses.²⁵ Unlike the spike protein of SARS-CoV, the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is preactivated by the proprotein convertase furin prior to cell entry; the cell-surface protease transmembrane serine protease 2 and lysosomal cathepsin protease also participate in cell entry. The SARS-CoV-2 RBD binds to human ACE2 (hACE2) with higher affinity than does SARS-CoV. In contrast, the spike protein as a whole has lower affinity for hACE2, suggesting that the SARS-CoV-2 RBD provides a way to evade the immune system while still allowing efficient cell entry.^66,67The current coronavirus outbreak represents the third transmission of coronaviruses from animals to humans in the last 2 decades. In 2002, an outbreak of SARS-CoV in China caused 916 deaths (case fatality rate of 11%).^12,21 In 2012, another related coronavirus, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), emerged in Middle Eastern countries, with a mortality rate of 34%.^86,88 Several studies on the evolution of these viruses^18,25,26 and more recently on SARS-CoV-2¹ point to bats as the origin of infection for all 3 viruses.As for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 likely moved from bat reservoirs to a yet-unknown intermediate host and then to humans.^1,92 Masked civet cats and dromedary camels have been identified as the intermediate host for SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, respectively.^73,89 Notably, several animal species seem to be naturally susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, mainly due to the highly conserved nature of the ACE2 protein among diverse animal species, especially mammals. Pangolins,⁴⁴ dogs⁵⁸ and snakes⁴⁶ were under investigation as potential intermediate hosts for SARS-CoV-2. However, the animal species that enabled transmission to humans has yet to be determined. Natural infections have been reported in dogs, domestic cats, wild felids, gorillas, minks, ferrets, and white-tailed deer.^{3,14,22,28,50,54,55,72} (One source, Chandler JC and colleagues has not been peer reviewed). Several studies have been conducted to establish animal models for SARS-CoV-2 infection, including hACE2 mice, hamsters, NHP, cats, and ferrets.In this review, we discuss the natural occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in animals and available animal models of SARS-CoV-2 infection and pathogenesis.     

Mouse Models for the Study of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Mice are an invaluable resource for studying virus-induced disease. They are a small, genetically modifiable animal for which a large arsenal of genetic and immunologic tools is available for evaluation of pathogenesis and potential vaccines and therapeutics. SARS-CoV-2, the betacoronavirus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, does not naturally replicate in wild-type mice, due to structural differences between human and mouse ACE2, the primary receptor for SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells. However, several mouse strains have been developed that allow for SARS-CoV-2 replication and clinical disease. Two broad strategies have primarily been deployed for developing mouse strains susceptible to COVID-19-like disease: adding in the human ACE2 gene and adapting the virus to the mouse ACE2 receptor. Both approaches result in mice that develop several of the clinical and pathologic hallmarks of COVID-19, including acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute lung injury. In this review, we describe key acute pulmonary and extrapulmonary pathologic changes seen in COVID-19 patients that mouse models of SARS-CoV-2 infection ideally replicate, the essential development of mouse models for the study of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome and the basis of many of the models of COVID-19, and key clinical and pathologic features of currently available mouse models of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Coronaviruses are widespread and infect several different species. In humans, coronaviruses historically cause primarily mild respiratory diseases, such as the common cold. However, in 2003 a novel coronavirus emerged, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), which caused severe respiratory disease with high mortality.¹⁸ Since then, 2 other highly pathogenic coronaviruses from the same betacoronavirus genus have emerged: Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012, and most recently, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).^18,133,134 Spread of SARS-CoV-2, which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has resulted in a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic, and as of May 2021, more than 160 million cases and more than 3.3 million deaths have been reported worldwide.¹²³Much like SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 has 4 structural proteins—spike (S), envelope (E), membrane (M), and nucleocapsid (N)—and 8 accessory proteins. The S protein includes a receptor-binding domain, which is essential for the virus to bind to and subsequently infect a host cell.¹²⁴ SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 both use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as the primary receptor and transmembrane protease serine 2 as a cofactor,^42,56,60 In contrast, the receptor for MERS-CoV is dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4).⁹¹ Because of amino acid changes in the S protein, SARS-CoV-2 binds ACE2 with a higher affinity than does SARS-CoV,¹²⁴ which may explain the greater human infectivity of SARS-CoV-2.^42,102 ACE2 is expressed throughout the body, allowing SARS-CoV-2 to potentially infect multiple organs, including the lung, heart, kidney, liver, intestines, and brain. Importantly, ACE2 is expressed on the apical surfaces of epithelial cells in these organs, permitting infection from direct viral contact with those cells.³⁷ As its name suggests, ACE2 is a critical component of the renin–angiotensin cascade, limiting vasoconstriction and promoting vasodilation by converting angiotensin II to angiotensin 1–7. ACE2 in the lung is hypothesized to reduce lung inflammation; SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 potentially could exacerbate lung inflammation by altering this pathway.⁹⁸A thorough understanding of disease pathogenesis and any potential vaccines or therapeutics for any emerging pathogen is facilitated by studying animal models. For example, the first FDA-approved treatment for COVID-19 was remdesivir. This drug initially was granted emergency-use authorization for COVID-19 patients in part because of demonstrated therapeutic efficacy against MERS-CoV infection in a mouse model.¹⁰³ An ideal animal model of COVID-19 captures the wide spectrum of disease phenotypes attributed to this multifaceted disease, including organ-specific pathology and systemic changes such as hypercoagulation and cytokine storms. Animal models rarely capture every aspect of human disease, requiring the use of multiple models in order to replicate the numerous features of viral infection and disease and thereby build a comprehensive picture of what happens in human patients.SARS-CoV-2 naturally infects numerous animal species, including mink on farms, big cats in zoos and sanctuaries, and domestic dogs and cats.^{28,36,68,72,81,87,104,107} Although mink are particularly vulnerable to severe SARS-CoV-2 disease and can transmit virus to humans, they are rarely used in research studies.^68,81,87 Mice, hamsters, ferrets, and nonhuman primates are more widely used as experimental models of SARS-CoV-2 infection.⁶⁸ Hamsters replicate human disease well, are small, and are widely available, making them an attractive choice.^12,68,105 However, hamsters are less commonly used in research than are mice, and the availability of strains and reagents necessary for studying genetic and immune drivers of disease is limited for hamsters. Ferrets are frequently used as models for respiratory viruses, particularly influenza, primarily because they disperse and are susceptible to these viruses via airborne droplets, whereas rodents do not. However, ferrets do not develop severe symptoms or generate high virus titers in the lungs after SARS-CoV-2 infection.^52,68,95,104 NHPs have similar immune responses to humans and are invaluable for safety studies for preclinical trials but are costly to use and require significant infrastructure to maintain studies.^66,68,130 Mice provide a valuable model because they are widely available and relatively inexpensive, and a large arsenal of genetic and immunologic tools is available for mice. The use of mice to study SARS-CoV-2 infection provides the potential for a broader understanding of several different aspects of this complex disease.     

Overview of Nonhuman Primate Models of SARS-CoV-2

COVID-19, the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 betacoronavirus, was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. Since then, SARS-CoV-2 has triggered a devastating global health and economic emergency. In response, a broad range of preclinical animal models have been used to identify effective therapies and vaccines. Current animal models do not express the full spectrum of human COVID-19 disease and pathology, with most exhibiting mild to moderate disease without mortality. NHPs are physiologically, genetically, and immunologically more closely related to humans than other animal species; thus, they provide a relevant model for SARS-CoV-2 investigations. This overview summarizes NHP models of SARS-CoV-2 and their role in vaccine and therapeutic development.

Coronaviruses are enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense, RNA viruses in the subfamily Orthocoronavirinae, family Coronaviridae, order Nidovirales. There are 4 coronavirus genera, that is, Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus, which infect mammals; and Gammacoronavirus and Deltacoronavirus, which primarily infect birds, with some able to infect mammals.¹³³ From these natural reservoirs, coronaviruses may infect other animals and humans. Human transmission typically requires an intermediate host.Prior to the 2002 SARS-CoV epidemic, only 2 human coronaviruses (HCoVs) had been identified - an alphacoronavirus (HCoV-229E) transmitted from bats to humans by alpacas, and a betacoronavirus (HCoV-OC43) transmitted from rodents to humans by cattle.^16,18 In 2004, HCoV-NL63 (alphacoronavirus, bat reservoir) and in 2005, HCoV-HKU1 (betacoronavirus, rodent reservoir) were identified.^39,132 Together, these 4 HCoVs cause an estimated 15% to 30% of common cold cases in humans, but can cause severe infections in infants, juvenile children, and the elderly.^23,64 However, in 2002, a new betacoronavirus caused an epidemic that originated in China, resulting in 8,000 confirmed cases with a mortality rate of 9.6%. The virus was named SARS-CoV and was transmitted from bats to humans by a palm civet intermediate host.^59,63,83 Ten years later in June 2012, MERS-CoV, a novel betacoronavirus transmitted from bats to humans by dromedary camels, emerged in Saudi Arabia.^17,25 MERS-CoV was also responsible for a 2015 outbreak in South Korea. Although human-to-human transmission of MERS-CoV was limited, the virus resulted in more than 2,000 confirmed cases and a mortality rate of approximately 35%.⁹ Elderly people and those with comorbidities were more likely to develop severe disease.⁴³Seven y later, in December 2019, another novel betacoronavirus named SARS-CoV-2, emerged in Wuhan City, Hubei Province China.^19,26 The animal reservoir responsible for transmission to humans has not been definitively identified but has been reported to be bats.^4,143 In February 2020, the World Health Organization named the disease associated with SARS-CoV-2, Corona virus disease 19 (COVID-19) and declared it a pandemic on March 11, 2020.^22,62,95 COVID-19 causes fever and pneumonia that can progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiple organ dysfunction and failure, coagulopathy, and death.³¹ Common gross findings in human autopsy specimens include lung consolidation, pulmonary edema, increased lung weight, pleurisy, white mucous and pink froth in airways, and hemorrhage. Histopathologic changes of human COVID-19 follow a timeline relative to the onset of symptoms.⁸⁶ During early infection, microvascular damage, thrombi, exudate formation, and intra-alveolar fibrin deposits occur. Epithelial changes can be present at all stages of disease, specifically diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), which includes hyaline membrane formation, epithelial denudation and pneumocyte hyperplasia. Finally, interstitial fibrosis develops about 3 wk after symptom onset.¹¹⁰ The clinical presentation of those infected with SARS-CoV-2 ranges from mild to severe to critical in 81%, 14%, and 5% of cases, respectively.^135,145 Similar to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, severe disease from SARS-CoV-2 is more likely in elderly individuals or in those with comorbidities.^12,72,127 In a New York City hospital study, deaths among hospital patients at the study endpoint were 3.3% or lower in patients in their 40s or younger, 4.8% among those in their 50s, 6.4% in their 60s, 12.6% in their 70s, and 25.9% in their 80s or above. Age related death rates reported by China, Italy and France are similar to the United States. Reported rates of asymptomatic infection range from 4% to 32%; however,¹²⁷ a systematic review concluded that true asymptomatic infection could be uncommon.^8,82,111,127The contagiousness of an infectious disease is referred to as the R₀, or reproduction number, and indicates the average number of people who will contract a contagious disease from someone infected with that disease. SARS-CoV (R₀ of 1.5 to 1.9)^12,72,127 and MERS-CoV (R₀ of less than 1) have R₀ values lower than SARS-CoV-2 (initial R₀ was calculated to be 2.0 to 2.5, now revised upward to 5.7) and a lower fatality rate (2.3%).^84,97 As of December 26, 2020, 78,604,532 confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases and 1,744,235 COVID-19 related deaths have been reported worldwide.¹²⁹ The global impact of COVID-19 has been catastrophic, with adverse effects on physical and mental health, an overwhelming need for health care resources, and increased poverty and economic insecurity.⁴⁷ Effective vaccines and therapeutics are key to controlling the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The success of these efforts depends in part on animal models that replicate human COVID-19 disease.^52,81,105The ideal animal model for SARS-CoV-2 should be permissive to infection, have the same receptors for viral entry as in humans, and replicate the full spectrum of human COVID-19 disease and pathology.¹⁰⁹ Several publications review and compare common animal models for SARS-CoV-2 and conclude that current models simulate mild infection with full recovery, but not severe COVID-19 disease.^{13,31,52,78,81,100,105} Disease features not expressed in current animal models include ARDS, coagulopathy, systemic sequelae, and mortality.³¹This review will focus on why NHPs provide a valuable model for SARS-CoV-2 research. Using NHPs has several drawbacks as compared with small animal models, including higher purchase cost, limited availability, higher housing cost, larger space requirement, and need for specialized staff. In addition, NHPs are outbred, leading to greater variation in results among individual animals, sometimes making data analysis and interpretation difficult.^40,68 The preexisting shortage of NHPs available for biomedical research, combined with the high demand for COVID-19 research and China’s ban on the sale, transport, and export of NHPs to curtail the spread of COVID-19 (instituted January 26, 2020) has affected NHP research globally.^{3,116,138,141} Nevertheless, the scientific benefits of using NHPs for SARS-CoV-2 research outweigh these drawbacks. NHPs are physiologically, genetically, and immunologically more closely related to humans than are small animals.⁶⁸ Furthermore, the main receptor for SAR-CoV-2 binding, angiotensin l converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), in catarrhines (apes, Asian monkeys, and African monkeys) is identical to the human ACE2 receptor.^24,74 Moreover, like most humans, macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop mild to moderate respiratory disease. Thus, macaques offer a relevant model to study SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis, therapeutics, vaccines, and the impact of age and other comorbidities on disease outcome.     

Hamsters as a Model of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), rapidly spread across the world in late 2019, leading to a pandemic. While SARS-CoV-2 infections predominately affect the respiratory system, severe infections can lead to renal and cardiac injury and even death. Due to its highly transmissible nature and severe health implications, animal models of SARS-CoV-2 are critical to developing novel therapeutics and preventatives. Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) are an ideal animal model of SARS-CoV-2 infections because they recapitulate many aspects of human infections. After inoculation with SARS-CoV-2, hamsters become moribund, lose weight, and show varying degrees of respiratory disease, lethargy, and ruffled fur. Histopathologically, their pulmonary lesions are consistent with human infections including interstitial to broncho-interstitial pneumonia, alveolar hemorrhage and edema, and granulocyte infiltration. Similar to humans, the duration of clinical signs and pulmonary pathology are short lived with rapid recovery by 14 d after infection. Immunocompromised hamsters develop more severe infections and mortality. Preclinical studies in hamsters have shown efficacy of therapeutics, including convalescent serum treatment, and preventatives, including vaccination, in limiting or preventing clinical disease. Although hamster studies have contributed greatly to our understanding of the pathogenesis and progression of disease after SARS-CoV-2 infection, additional studies are required to better characterize the effects of age, sex, and virus variants on clinical outcomes in hamsters. This review aims to describe key findings from studies of hamsters infected with SARS-CoV-2 and to highlight areas that need further investigation.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel betacoronavirus that was first detected in Wuhan, China at the end of 2019.³¹ Coronavirus infections predominantly present with either respiratory or gastrointestinal manifestations, depending on the strain and host. While many coronavirus infections result in mild clinical symptoms, SARS-CoV-2 is highly pathogenic and poses significant health concerns.^31,58,78 Although initial clinical signs are attributed to the respiratory system, severe infections result in systemic complications, such as acute cardiac and renal injury, secondary infections, and shock.^31,58SARS-CoV-2 relies on a structural surface spike glycoprotein to establish infection. The spike protein binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor on host cells to gain entry in a receptor-mediated fashion. This interaction facilitates both human-to-human transmission and cross-species infection.⁷⁷ Species tropism is determined by the presence of ACE2 residues that recognize the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Animals permissive for SARS-CoV-2 infection include cats, ferrets, pigs, nonhuman primates, select genetically modified mice, and hamsters.^5,7,23,37,67 Susceptible species can be both intermediate hosts and sources of infection of SARS-CoV-2 for humans.⁷⁷ Rodents, such as mice and hamsters, are ideal models for the study of COVID-19 due to their small size, ready availability, low cost of care, SPF status, and in-depth characterization across a variety of translational models, including past and present betacoronavirus infections.^60,61 Although transgenic mice expressing human ACE2 are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection, Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) naturally express ACE2 residues that recognize the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.^5,46,84 As such, Syrian hamsters are a valuable animal model for studying COVID-19.Syrian hamsters, commonly referred to as golden hamsters, belong to the family Cricetidae and have a natural geographic range of arid southeast Europe and Asia Minor. Additional members of the Cricetidae family used in biomedical research include Chinese hamsters (Cricetulus griseus), European hamsters (Cricetus cricetus), Armenian hamsters (Cricetulus migratorius), and dwarf hamsters (Phodopus species). Unless otherwise noted, any mention of hamsters in this overview refers to Syrian hamsters. Laboratory hamsters primarily originated from one Syrian litter captured in 1930. Progeny of this litter were first imported into the United States in 1938.⁵⁰ Outbred Syrian hamsters are widely available; recently developed transgenic hamsters are increasingly used in biomedical research and may provide unique insight into SARS-CoV-2 infections.^22,44 Syrian hamsters have a rich history in biomedical research and can be used to model cancer and infectious, metabolic, cardiovascular, and respiratory diseases.⁵⁰Hamsters play an important role in SARS-CoV-2 studies. This is due, in part, to their susceptibility to the first described highly pathogenic coronavirus infection in the 21st century, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV). SARS-CoV emerged in late 2002 in Southern China. Although individuals in more than 20 countries contracted SARS-CoV, the spread was quickly contained, with the last reported case in July 2003.^16,40 After experimental infection with SARS-CoV, hamsters developed high viral loads in the lungs and nasal turbinates.^{15,32,56,62,69} Pulmonary pathology included inflammation, cell necrosis, and consolidation without clinical signs of disease.⁶¹ Based on their susceptibility to SARS-CoV and natural expression of ACE2 capable of recognizing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, hamsters have been a preferred model of SARS-CoV-2. Hamster studies have replicated key aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infections in humans, including viral replication, transmission, and pathology. Furthermore, hamsters are a model organism for developing and testing novel preventions and therapeutics. However, using hamsters in biomedical research has several key limitations, including the lack of reagents, especially antibodies, suitable for use with hamster tissue and the relatively few established transgenic hamsters compared to mice. The purpose of this review is to describe key findings of hamster models of SARS-CoV-2 and to highlight gaps in our current understanding that will require further investigation.     

Viral and Host Attributes Underlying the Origins of Zoonotic Coronaviruses in Bats

Factors affecting the origins of zoonotic coronaviruses in batsWith a presumed origin in bats, the COVID-19 pandemic has been a major source of morbidity and mortality in the human population, and the causative agent, SARS-CoV-2, aligns most closely at the genome level with the bat coronaviruses RaBtCoV4991/RaTG13 and RmYN02. The ability of bats to provide reservoirs of numerous viruses in addition to coronaviruses remains an active area of research. Unique aspects of the physiology of the chiropteran immune system may contribute to the ability of bats to serve as viral reservoirs. The coronavirus spike protein plays important roles in viral pathogenesis and the immune response. Although much attention has focused on the spike receptor-binding domain, a unique aspect of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with its closest relatives is the presence of a furin cleavage site in the S1–S2 region of the spike protein. Proteolytic activation is likely an important feature that allows SARS-CoV-2—and other coronaviruses—to overcome the species barriers and thus cause human disease. The diversity of bat species limits the ability to draw broad conclusions about viral pathogenesis, but comparisons across species and with reference to humans and other susceptible mammals may guide future research in this regard.

The COVID-19 pandemic remains a global public health emergency. The virus causing the pandemic (SARS-CoV-2) was identified in late 2019, after an outbreak of respiratory disease in Wuhan, China.⁸⁷ Early sequencing aligned SARS-CoV-2 with the previously detected RaBtCoV/4991.^13,20 SARS-CoV-2 was then further sequenced to yield the full genome (reported as RaTG13⁹⁵), defining SARV-CoV-2 as being a probable bat-origin zoonotic coronavirus. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), which emerged in 2002, and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), which emerged in 2012, are also considered to be of bat origin.^46,51,71 At least 2 other commonly circulating coronaviruses in humans also likely originated in bats: HCoV-229E and HCoV-NL63.^15,33 However, the human coronaviruses (HCoV) OC43 and HKU1 have alternatively been suggested to have emerged from rodents via cattle and from rodents via an unknown intermediate, respectively.^47,73 Swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus, a cause of significant mortality in piglets, emerged in 2016 in the Guangdong province of China from the bat virus Rhinolophus bat HKU2.^22,59,94 The swine enteric coronavirus porcine epidemic diarrhea virus is also considered to have bat origins.³¹ Numerous other viral diseases of human concern, including Nipah and Hendra viruses and ebolavirus, moved into human populations from bats.^14,25,41 Bats are also a common reservoir for the lethal rabies virus.^9,64 The ability of bats to harbor and spread these viruses continues to be an active area of study, integrating surveillance, ecology, disease forecasting, and basic virology to protect human and animal populations.     

The nuclease activity of DNA2 promotes exonuclease 1–independent mismatch repair

The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system is a major DNA repair system that corrects DNA replication errors. In eukaryotes, the MMR system functions via mechanisms both dependent on and independent of exonuclease 1 (EXO1), an enzyme that has multiple roles in DNA metabolism. Although the mechanism of EXO1-dependent MMR is well understood, less is known about EXO1-independent MMR. Here, we provide genetic and biochemical evidence that the DNA2 nuclease/helicase has a role in EXO1-independent MMR. Biochemical reactions reconstituted with purified human proteins demonstrated that the nuclease activity of DNA2 promotes an EXO1-independent MMR reaction via a mismatch excision-independent mechanism that involves DNA polymerase δ. We show that DNA polymerase ε is not able to replace DNA polymerase δ in the DNA2-promoted MMR reaction. Unlike its nuclease activity, the helicase activity of DNA2 is dispensable for the ability of the protein to enhance the MMR reaction. Further examination established that DNA2 acts in the EXO1-independent MMR reaction by increasing the strand-displacement activity of DNA polymerase δ. These data reveal a mechanism for EXO1-independent mismatch repair.

The mismatch repair (MMR) system has been conserved from bacteria to humans (1, 2). It promotes genome stability by suppressing spontaneous and DNA damage-induced mutations (1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). The key function of the MMR system is the correction of DNA replication errors that escape the proofreading activities of replicative DNA polymerases (1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12). In addition, the MMR system removes mismatches formed during strand exchange in homologous recombination, suppresses homeologous recombination, initiates apoptosis in response to irreparable DNA damage caused by several anticancer drugs, and contributes to instability of triplet repeats and alternative DNA structures (1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18). The principal components of the eukaryotic MMR system are MutSα (MSH2-MSH6 heterodimer), MutLα (MLH1-PMS2 heterodimer in humans and Mlh1-Pms1 heterodimer in yeast), MutSβ (MSH2-MSH3 heterodimer), proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), replication factor C (RFC), exonuclease 1 (EXO1), RPA, and DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ). Loss-of-function mutations in the MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2 genes of the human MMR system cause Lynch and Turcot syndromes, and hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter is responsible for ∼15% of sporadic cancers in several organs (19, 20). MMR deficiency leads to cancer initiation and progression via a multistage process that involves the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes and action of oncogenes (21).MMR occurs behind the replication fork (22, 23) and is a major determinant of the replication fidelity (24). The correction of DNA replication errors by the MMR system increases the replication fidelity by ∼100 fold (25). Strand breaks in leading and lagging strands as well as ribonucleotides in leading strands serve as signals that direct the eukaryotic MMR system to remove DNA replication errors (26, 27, 28, 29, 30). MMR is more efficient on the lagging than the leading strand (31). The substrates for MMR are all six base–base mismatches and 1 to 13-nt insertion/deletion loops (25, 32, 33, 34). Eukaryotic MMR commences with recognition of the mismatch by MutSα or MutSβ (32, 34, 35, 36). MutSα is the primary mismatch-recognition factor that recognizes both base–base mismatches and small insertion/deletion loops whereas MutSβ recognizes small insertion/deletion loops (32, 34, 35, 36, 37). After recognizing the mismatch, MutSα or MutSβ cooperates with RFC-loaded PCNA to activate MutLα endonuclease (38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43). The activated MutLα endonuclease incises the discontinuous daughter strand 5′ and 3′ to the mismatch. A 5'' strand break formed by MutLα endonuclease is utilized by EXO1 to enter the DNA and excise a discontinuous strand portion encompassing the mismatch in a 5''→3′ excision reaction stimulated by MutSα/MutSβ (38, 44, 45). The generated gap is filled in by the Pol δ holoenzyme, and the nick is ligated by a DNA ligase (44, 46, 47). DNA polymerase ε (Pol ε) can substitute for Pol δ in the EXO1-dependent MMR reaction, but its activity in this reaction is much lower than that of Pol δ (48). Although MutLα endonuclease is essential for MMR in vivo, 5′ nick-dependent MMR reactions reconstituted in the presence of EXO1 are MutLα-independent (44, 47, 49).EXO1 deficiency in humans does not seem to cause significant cancer predisposition (19). Nevertheless, it is known that Exo1^-/- mice are susceptible to the development of lymphomas (50). Genetic studies in yeast and mice demonstrated that EXO1 inactivation causes only a modest defect in MMR (50, 51, 52, 53). In agreement with these genetic studies, a defined human EXO1-independent MMR reaction that depends on the strand-displacement DNA synthesis activity of Pol δ holoenzyme to remove the mismatch was reconstituted (54). Furthermore, an EXO1-independent MMR reaction that occurred in a mammalian cell extract system without the formation of a gapped excision intermediate was observed (54). Together, these findings implicated the strand-displacement activity of Pol δ holoenzyme in EXO1-independent MMR.In this study, we investigated DNA2 in the context of MMR. DNA2 is an essential multifunctional protein that has nuclease, ATPase, and 5''→3′ helicase activities (55, 56, 57). Previous research ascertained that DNA2 removes long flaps during Okazaki fragment maturation (58, 59, 60), participates in the resection step of double-strand break repair (61, 62, 63), initiates the replication checkpoint (64), and suppresses the expansions of GAA repeats (65). We have found in vivo and in vitro evidence that DNA2 promotes EXO1-independent MMR. Our data have indicated that the nuclease activity of DNA2 enhances the strand-displacement activity of Pol δ holoenzyme in an EXO1-independent MMR reaction.     

New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Transplantation in a Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fasicularis)

A 5.5-y-old intact male cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fasicularis) presented with inappetence and weight loss 57 d after heterotopic heart and thymus transplantation while receiving an immunosuppressant regimen consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone to prevent graft rejection. A serum chemistry panel, a glycated hemoglobin test, and urinalysis performed at presentation revealed elevated blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (727 mg/dL and 10.1%, respectively), glucosuria, and ketonuria. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed, and insulin therapy was initiated immediately. The macaque was weaned off the immunosuppressive therapy as his clinical condition improved and stabilized. Approximately 74 d after discontinuation of the immunosuppressants, the blood glucose normalized, and the insulin therapy was stopped. The animal''s blood glucose and HbA1c values have remained within normal limits since this time. We suspect that our macaque experienced new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, a condition that is commonly observed in human transplant patients but not well described in NHP. To our knowledge, this report represents the first documented case of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation in a cynomolgus macaque.Abbreviations: NODAT, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantationNew-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT, formerly known as posttransplantation diabetes mellitus) is an important consequence of solid-organ transplantation in humans.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} A variety of risk factors have been identified including increased age, sex (male prevalence), elevated pretransplant fasting plasma glucose levels, and immunosuppressive therapy.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} The relationship between calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporin, and the development of NODAT is widely recognized in human medicine.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} Cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fasicularis) are a commonly used NHP model in organ transplantation research. Cases of natural and induced diabetes of cynomolgus monkeys have been described in the literature;^14,43,45 however, NODAT in a macaque model of solid-organ transplantation has not been reported previously to our knowledge.     

Induction of COX-2-PGE2 synthesis by activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway contributes to neuronal death triggered by TDP-43-depleted microglia

Neuroinflammation is a striking hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Previous studies have shown the contribution of glial cells such as astrocytes in TDP-43-linked ALS. However, the role of microglia in TDP-43-mediated motor neuron degeneration remains poorly understood. In this study, we show that depletion of TDP-43 in microglia, but not in astrocytes, strikingly upregulates cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production through the activation of MAPK/ERK signaling and initiates neurotoxicity. Moreover, we find that administration of celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, greatly diminishes the neurotoxicity triggered by TDP-43-depleted microglia. Taken together, our results reveal a previously unrecognized non-cell-autonomous mechanism in TDP-43-mediated neurodegeneration, identifying COX-2-PGE2 as the molecular events of microglia- but not astrocyte-initiated neurotoxicity and identifying celecoxib as a novel potential therapy for TDP-43-linked ALS and possibly other types of ALS.Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an adult-onset neurodegenerative disease characterized by the degeneration of motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord.¹ Most cases of ALS are sporadic, but 10% are familial. Familial ALS cases are associated with mutations in genes such as Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TARDBP) and, most recently discovered, C9orf72. Currently, most available information obtained from ALS research is based on the study of SOD1, but new studies focusing on TARDBP and C9orf72 have come to the forefront of ALS research.^{1, 2} The discovery of the central role of the protein TDP-43, encoded by TARDBP, in ALS was a breakthrough in ALS research.^{3, 4, 5} Although pathogenic mutations of TDP-43 are genetically rare, abnormal TDP-43 function is thought to be associated with the majority of ALS cases.¹ TDP-43 was identified as a key component of the ubiquitin-positive inclusions in most ALS patients and also in other neurodegenerative diseases such as frontotemporal lobar degeneration,^{6, 7} Alzheimer''s disease (AD)^{8, 9} and Parkinson''s disease (PD).^{10, 11} TDP-43 is a multifunctional RNA binding protein, and loss-of-function of TDP-43 has been increasingly recognized as a key contributor in TDP-43-mediated pathogenesis.^{5, 12, 13, 14}Neuroinflammation, a striking and common hallmark involved in many neurodegenerative diseases, including ALS, is characterized by extensive activation of glial cells including microglia, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.^{15, 16} Although numerous studies have focused on the intrinsic properties of motor neurons in ALS, a large amount of evidence showed that glial cells, such as astrocytes and microglia, could have critical roles in SOD1-mediated motor neuron degeneration and ALS progression,^{17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22} indicating the importance of non-cell-autonomous toxicity in SOD1-mediated ALS pathogenesis.Very interestingly, a vital insight of neuroinflammation research in ALS was generated by the evidence that both the mRNA and protein levels of the pro-inflammatory enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) are upregulated in both transgenic mouse models and in human postmortem brain and spinal cord.^{23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} The role of COX-2 neurotoxicity in ALS and other neurodegenerative disorders has been well explored.^{30, 31, 32} One of the key downstream products of COX-2, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), can directly mediate COX-2 neurotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo.^{33, 34, 35, 36, 37} The levels of COX-2 expression and PGE2 production are controlled by multiple cell signaling pathways, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK pathway,^{38, 39, 40} and they have been found to be increased in neurodegenerative diseases including AD, PD and ALS.^{25, 28, 32, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46} Importantly, COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib exhibited significant neuroprotective effects and prolonged survival or delayed disease onset in a SOD1-ALS transgenic mouse model through the downregulation of PGE2 release.²⁸Most recent studies have tried to elucidate the role of glial cells in neurotoxicity using TDP-43-ALS models, which are considered to be helpful for better understanding the disease mechanisms.^{47, 48, 49, 50, 51} Although the contribution of glial cells to TDP-43-mediated motor neuron degeneration is now well supported, this model does not fully suggest an astrocyte-based non-cell autonomous mechanism. For example, recent studies have shown that TDP-43-mutant astrocytes do not affect the survival of motor neurons,^{50, 51} indicating a previously unrecognized non-cell autonomous TDP-43 proteinopathy that associates with cell types other than astrocytes.Given that the role of glial cell types other than astrocytes in TDP-43-mediated neuroinflammation is still not fully understood, we aim to compare the contribution of microglia and astrocytes to neurotoxicity in a TDP-43 loss-of-function model. Here, we show that TDP-43 has a dominant role in promoting COX-2-PGE2 production through the MAPK/ERK pathway in primary cultured microglia, but not in primary cultured astrocytes. Our study suggests that overproduction of PGE2 in microglia is a novel molecular mechanism underlying neurotoxicity in TDP-43-linked ALS. Moreover, our data identify celecoxib as a new potential effective treatment of TDP-43-linked ALS and possibly other types of ALS.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

The Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 axis affects spindle assembly checkpoint robustness and sensitivity to antimicrotubule cancer drugs

To grant faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit until mitotic spindle assembly. An exceedingly prolonged mitosis, however, promotes cell death and by this means antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs), that impair spindle assembly, are believed to kill cancer cells. Despite malformed spindles, cancer cells can, however, slip through SAC, exit mitosis prematurely and resist killing. We show here that the Fcp1 phosphatase and Wee1, the cyclin B-dependent kinase (cdk) 1 inhibitory kinase, play a role for this slippage/resistance mechanism. During AMCD-induced prolonged mitosis, Fcp1-dependent Wee1 reactivation lowered cdk1 activity, weakening SAC-dependent mitotic arrest and leading to mitosis exit and survival. Conversely, genetic or chemical Wee1 inhibition strengthened the SAC, further extended mitosis, reduced antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 to a minimum and potentiated killing in several, AMCD-treated cancer cell lines and primary human adult lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Thus, the Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 (FWC) axis affects SAC robustness and AMCDs sensitivity.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit to coordinate anaphase onset with spindle assembly. To this end, SAC inhibits the ubiquitin ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) to prevent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor securin and cyclin B, the major mitotic cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1) activator, until spindle assembly.¹ However, by yet poorly understood mechanisms, exceedingly prolonging mitosis translates into cell death induction.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Although mechanistic details are still missing on how activation of cell death pathways is linked to mitosis duration, prolongation of mitosis appears crucial for the ability of antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs) to kill cancer cells.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} These drugs, targeting microtubules, impede mitotic spindle assembly and delay mitosis exit by chronically activating the SAC. Use of these drugs is limited, however, by toxicity and resistance. A major mechanism for resistance is believed to reside in the ability of cancer cells to slip through the SAC and exit mitosis prematurely despite malformed spindles, thus resisting killing by limiting mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Under the AMCD treatment, cells either die in mitosis or exit mitosis, slipping through the SAC, without or abnormally dividing.^{2, 3, 4} Cells that exit mitosis either die at later stages or survive and stop dividing or proliferate, giving rise to resistance.^{2, 3, 4} Apart from a role for p53, what dictates cell fate is still unknown; however, it appears that the longer mitosis is protracted, the higher the chances for cell death pathway activation are.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}Although SAC is not required per se for killing,⁶ preventing SAC adaptation should improve the efficacy of AMCD by increasing mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Therefore, further understanding of the mechanisms by which cells override SAC may help to improve the current AMCD therapy. Several kinases are known to activate and sustain SAC, and cdk1 itself appears to be of primary relevance.^{1, 8, 9} By studying mitosis exit and SAC resolution, we recently reported a role for the Fcp1 phosphatase to bring about cdk1 inactivation.^{10, 11} Among Fcp1 targets, we identified cyclin degradation pathway components, such as Cdc20, an APC/C co-activator, USP44, a deubiquitinating enzyme, and Wee1.^{10, 11} Wee1 is a crucial kinase that controls the G2 phase by performing inhibitory phosphorylation of cdk1 at tyr-15 (Y15-cdk1). Wee1 is also in a feedback relationship with cdk1 itself that, in turn, can phosphorylate and inhibit Wee1 in an autoamplification loop to promote the G2-to-M phase transition.¹² At mitosis exit, Fcp1 dephosphorylated Wee1 at threonine 239, a cdk1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation, to dampen down the cdk1 autoamplification loop, and Cdc20 and USP44, to promote APC/C-dependent cyclin B degradation.^{10, 11, 12} In this study we analysed the Fcp1 relevance in SAC adaptation and AMCD sensitivity.     

Focus on Ethylene: Ethylene Biosynthesis Is Promoted by Very-Long-Chain Fatty Acids during Lysigenous Aerenchyma Formation in Rice Roots

In rice (Oryza sativa) roots, lysigenous aerenchyma, which is created by programmed cell death and lysis of cortical cells, is constitutively formed under aerobic conditions, and its formation is further induced under oxygen-deficient conditions. Ethylene is involved in the induction of aerenchyma formation. reduced culm number1 (rcn1) is a rice mutant in which the gene encoding the ATP-binding cassette transporter RCN1/OsABCG5 is defective. Here, we report that the induction of aerenchyma formation was reduced in roots of rcn1 grown in stagnant deoxygenated nutrient solution (i.e. under stagnant conditions, which mimic oxygen-deficient conditions in waterlogged soils). 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase (ACS) is a key enzyme in ethylene biosynthesis. Stagnant conditions hardly induced the expression of ACS1 in rcn1 roots, resulting in low ethylene production in the roots. Accumulation of saturated very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) of 24, 26, and 28 carbons was reduced in rcn1 roots. Exogenously supplied VLCFA (26 carbons) increased the expression level of ACS1 and induced aerenchyma formation in rcn1 roots. Moreover, in rice lines in which the gene encoding a fatty acid elongase, CUT1-LIKE (CUT1L; a homolog of the gene encoding Arabidopsis CUT1, which is required for cuticular wax production), was silenced, both ACS1 expression and aerenchyma formation were reduced. Interestingly, the expression of ACS1, CUT1L, and RCN1/OsABCG5 was induced predominantly in the outer part of roots under stagnant conditions. These results suggest that, in rice under oxygen-deficient conditions, VLCFAs increase ethylene production by promoting 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid biosynthesis in the outer part of roots, which, in turn, induces aerenchyma formation in the root cortex.Aerenchyma formation is a morphological adaptation of plants to complete submergence and waterlogging of the soil, and facilitates internal gas diffusion (Armstrong, 1979; Jackson and Armstrong, 1999; Colmer, 2003; Voesenek et al., 2006; Bailey-Serres and Voesenek, 2008; Licausi and Perata, 2009; Sauter, 2013; Voesenek and Bailey-Serres, 2015). To adapt to waterlogging in soil, rice (Oryza sativa) develops lysigenous aerenchyma in shoots (Matsukura et al., 2000; Colmer and Pedersen, 2008; Steffens et al., 2011) and roots (Jackson et al., 1985b; Justin and Armstrong, 1991; Kawai et al., 1998), which is formed by programmed cell death and subsequent lysis of some cortical cells (Jackson and Armstrong, 1999; Evans, 2004; Yamauchi et al., 2013). In rice roots, lysigenous aerenchyma is constitutively formed under aerobic conditions (Jackson et al., 1985b), and its formation is further induced under oxygen-deficient conditions (Colmer et al., 2006; Shiono et al., 2011). The former and latter are designated constitutive and inducible lysigenous aerenchyma formation, respectively (Colmer and Voesenek, 2009). The gaseous plant hormone ethylene regulates adaptive growth responses of plants to submergence (Voesenek and Blom, 1989; Voesenek et al., 1993; Visser et al., 1996a,b; Lorbiecke and Sauter, 1999; Hattori et al., 2009; Steffens and Sauter, 2009; van Veen et al., 2013). Ethylene also induces lysigenous aerenchyma formation in roots of some gramineous plants (Drew et al., 2000; Shiono et al., 2008). The treatment of roots with ethylene or its precursor (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid [ACC]) stimulates aerenchyma formation in rice (Justin and Armstrong, 1991; Colmer et al., 2006; Yukiyoshi and Karahara, 2014), maize (Zea mays; Drew et al., 1981; Jackson et al., 1985a; Takahashi et al., 2015), and wheat (Triticum aestivum; Yamauchi et al., 2014a,b). Moreover, treatment of roots with inhibitors of ethylene action or ethylene biosynthesis effectively blocks aerenchyma formation under hypoxic conditions in maize (Drew et al., 1981; Konings, 1982; Jackson et al., 1985a; Rajhi et al., 2011).Ethylene biosynthesis is accomplished by two main successive enzymatic reactions: conversion of S-adenosyl-Met to ACC by 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase (ACS), and conversion of ACC to ethylene by 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase (ACO; Yang and Hoffman, 1984). The activities of both enzymes are enhanced during aerenchyma formation under hypoxic conditions in maize root (He et al., 1996). Since the ACC content in roots of maize is increased by oxygen deficiency and is strongly correlated with ethylene production (Atwell et al., 1988), ACC biosynthesis is essential for ethylene production during aerenchyma formation in roots. In fact, exogenously supplied ACC induced ethylene production in roots of maize (Drew et al., 1979; Konings, 1982; Atwell et al., 1988) and wheat (Yamauchi et al., 2014b), even under aerobic conditions. Ethylene production in plants is inversely related to oxygen concentration (Yang and Hoffman, 1984). Under anoxic conditions, the oxidation of ACC to ethylene by ACO, which requires oxygen, is almost completely repressed (Yip et al., 1988; Tonutti and Ramina, 1991). Indeed, anoxic conditions stimulate neither ethylene production nor aerenchyma formation in maize adventitious roots (Drew et al., 1979). Therefore, it is unlikely that the root tissues forming inducible aerenchyma are anoxic, and that the ACO-mediated step is repressed. Moreover, aerenchyma is constitutively formed in rice roots even under aerobic conditions (Jackson et al., 1985b), and thus, after the onset of waterlogging, oxygen can be immediately supplied to the apical regions of roots through the constitutively formed aerenchyma.Very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs; ≥20 carbons) are major constituents of sphingolipids, cuticular waxes, and suberin in plants (Franke and Schreiber, 2007; Kunst and Samuels, 2009). In addition to their structural functions, VLCFAs directly or indirectly participate in several physiological processes (Zheng et al., 2005; Reina-Pinto et al., 2009; Roudier et al., 2010; Ito et al., 2011; Nobusawa et al., 2013; Tsuda et al., 2013), including the regulation of ethylene biosynthesis (Qin et al., 2007). During fiber cell elongation in cotton ovules, ethylene biosynthesis is enhanced by treatment with saturated VLCFAs, especially 24-carbon fatty acids, and is suppressed by an inhibitor of VLCFA biosynthesis (Qin et al., 2007). The first rate-limiting step in VLCFA biosynthesis is condensation of acyl-CoA with malonyl-CoA by β-ketoacyl-CoA synthase (KCS; Joubès et al., 2008). KCS enzymes are thought to determine the substrate and tissue specificities of fatty acid elongation (Joubès et al., 2008). The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genome has 21 KCS genes (Joubès et al., 2008). In the Arabidopsis cut1 mutant, which has a defect in the gene encoding CUT1 that is required for cuticular wax production (i.e. one of the KCS genes), the expression of AtACO genes and growth of root cells were reduced when compared with the wild type (Qin et al., 2007). Furthermore, expression of the AtACO genes was rescued by exogenously supplied saturated VLCFAs (Qin et al., 2007). These observations imply that VLCFAs or their derivatives work as regulatory factors for gene expression during some physiological processes in plants.reduced culm number1 (rcn1) was first identified as a rice mutant with a low tillering rate in a paddy field (Takamure and Kinoshita, 1985; Yasuno et al., 2007). The rcn1 (rcn1-2) mutant has a single nucleotide substitution in the gene encoding a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter subfamily G, RCN1/OsABCG5, causing an Ala-684Pro substitution (Yasuno et al., 2009). The mutation results in several mutant phenotypes, although the substrates of RCN1/OsABCG5 have not been determined (Ureshi et al., 2012; Funabiki et al., 2013; Matsuda et al., 2014). We previously found that the rcn1 mutant has abnormal root morphology, such as shorter root length and brownish appearance of roots, under stagnant (deoxygenated) conditions (which mimics oxygen-deficient conditions in waterlogged soils). We also found that the rcn1 mutant accumulates less of the major suberin monomers originating from VLCFAs in the outer part of adventitious roots, and this results in a reduction of a functional apoplastic barrier in the root hypodermis (Shiono et al., 2014a).The objective of this study was to elucidate the molecular basis of inducible aerenchyma formation. To this end, we examined lysigenous aerenchyma formation and ACC, ethylene, and VLCFA accumulation and their biosyntheses in rcn1 roots. Based on the results of these studies, we propose that VLCFAs are involved in inducible aerenchyma formation through the enhancement of ethylene biosynthesis in rice roots.     

Biology and Cellular Tropism of a Unique Astrovirus Strain: Murine Astrovirus 2

Biology and tropism of MuAstV2Murine astrovirus 2 (MuAstV2) is a novel murine astrovirus recently identified in laboratory and wild mice. MuAstV2 readily transmits between immunocompetent mice yet fails to transmit to highly immunocompromised mouse strains—a unique characteristic when contrasted with other murine viruses including other astroviruses. We characterized the viral shedding kinetics and tissue tropism of MuAstV2 in immunocompetent C57BL/6NCrl mice and evaluated the apparent resistance of highly immunocompromised NOD-Prkdc^em26Cd52Il2rg^em26Cd22/NjuCrl mice to MuAstV2 after oral inoculation. Temporal patterns of viral shedding were determined by serially measuring fecal viral RNA. Tissue tropism and viral load were characterized and quantified by using in-situ hybridization (ISH) targeting viral RNA. Cellular tropism was characterized by evaluating fluorescent colocalization of viral ISH with various immunohistochemical markers. We found a rapid increase of fecal viral RNA in B6 mice, which peaked at 5 d after inoculation (dpi) followed by cessation of shedding by 168 dpi. The small intestine had the highest percentage of hybridization (3.09% of tissue area) of all tissues in which hybridization occurred at 5 dpi. The thymus displayed the next highest degree of hybridization (2.3%) at 7 dpi, indicating extraintestinal viral spread. MuAstV2 RNA hybridization was found to colocalize with only 3 of the markers evaluated: CD3 (T cells), Iba1 (macrophages), and cytokeratin (enterocytes). A higher percentage of CD3 cells and Iba1 cells hybridized with MuAstV2 as compared with cytokeratin at 2 dpi (CD3, 59%; Iba1, 46%; cytokeratin, 6%) and 35 dpi (CD3, 14%; Iba1, 55%; cytokeratin, 3%). Neither fecal viral RNA nor viral hybridization was noted in NCG mice at the time points examined. In addition, mice of mixed genetic background were inoculated, and only those with a functioning Il2rg gene shed MuAstV2. Results from this study suggest that infection of, or interaction with, the immune system is required for infection by or replication of MuAstV2.

Astroviruses are nonenveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses with a star-like appearance—from which the name derives—when examined by transmission electron microscopy. First identified in 1975, astroviruses are commonly associated with gastrointestinal illness in children.^1,23 They demonstrate considerable diversity, and unique strains have been identified in numerous species through advances in molecular diagnostics.^{2,4-6,11-13,18,19,21,25,27,29,30,32,35-40} This broad distribution likely resulted from cross-species transmission and subsequent adaptation to the novel host.¹¹ Clinical presentation varies among species, although most infections are asymptomatic or limited to mild gastrointestinal illness.^4,9,11 Extraintestinal disease resulting in fatal encephalitis has been described in several species (including cows, mink, and immunocompromised people).^{3,19,22,26,35}Astroviral infection of mice was first described in 1985, when an unknown astrovirus was identified by electron microscopy in the feces of nude mice.¹⁷ Since then, astroviruses have been detected in many wild and laboratory mouse populations.^12,29,30,34 Despite their prevalence, studies have been limited and their effects on host biology remains largely unknown. Murine astrovirus (MuAstV) was identified through molecular sequencing in 2012 and has since been discovered to be enzootic in numerous research and production mouse colonies.^12,29,34 Whether the strain described in 1985 was MuAstV is unknown. Immunocompetent and immunodeficient mouse strains are both susceptible to MuAstV infection, although no clinical disease and only minimal pathology are observed.^7,47 Similar to astroviruses infecting other species, MuAstV infection is frequently localized to the gastrointestinal tract.⁴⁷ A recent study demonstrated MuAstV replication in goblet cells and altered mucus production within the gastrointestinal tract, highlighting the potential effect of the virus on select research studies despite the lack of clinical disease and pathology.⁸Our group previously reported the detection of a novel murine astrovirus, murine astrovirus 2 (MuAstV2), in a laboratory mouse colony.³¹ MuAstV2 is genetically distinct from MuAstV but is closely related to a strain recently reported in wild mice.^31,43 The MuAstV2 strain identified in the laboratory mouse colony shares 89.2% nucleotide identity to a strain detected in wild mice in New York City but less than 50% nucleotide identity to MuAstV, the strain commonly isolated from laboratory mice. In addition, MuAstV2 was found to share as much as 80.8% nucleotide similarity to an astrovirus strain isolated from urban brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) in Hong Kong.^5,31 Antibodies to MuAstV2 were inadvertently detected in laboratory colony mice when a serologic immunoassay for mouse thymic virus prepared from a murine T-cell line tested positive. Further analysis showed that the mice were negative for mouse thymic virus and that the T-cell line was contaminated with a novel astrovirus strain similar to MuAstV2, resulting in the positive test. The observation that MuAstV2 did not appear to infect highly immunocompromised mice via natural exposure or experimental inoculation was highly unusual.³¹ This finding is distinct from other murine viruses, including MuAstV, given that infection of immunocompromised mice leads to persistent infection and chronic virus shedding.^12,15,16,47We sought to further understand the biology of MuAstV2 by evaluating viral shedding kinetics and tissue tropism in immunocompetent mice and to further characterize the presumptive resistance to infection observed in highly immunocompromised mice. Temporal patterns of viral shedding were determined by serially measuring fecal viral RNA after oral inoculation. Tissue and cell tropism were characterized using in-situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry during the course of infection. We hypothesized that MuAstV2 initially infects the gastrointestinal tract, as occurs with other astroviruses, but speculated that components of the immune system were required to support infection or replication or both. Furthermore, we sought to characterize the extraintestinal spread of MuAstV2.     

Plasma membrane poration by opioid neuropeptides: a possible mechanism of pathological signal transduction

Neuropeptides induce signal transduction across the plasma membrane by acting through cell-surface receptors. The dynorphins, endogenous ligands for opioid receptors, are an exception; they also produce non-receptor-mediated effects causing pain and neurodegeneration. To understand non-receptor mechanism(s), we examined interactions of dynorphins with plasma membrane. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp electrophysiology, we demonstrate that dynorphins accumulate in the membrane and induce a continuum of transient increases in ionic conductance. This phenomenon is consistent with stochastic formation of giant (~2.7 nm estimated diameter) unstructured non-ion-selective membrane pores. The potency of dynorphins to porate the plasma membrane correlates with their pathogenic effects in cellular and animal models. Membrane poration by dynorphins may represent a mechanism of pathological signal transduction. Persistent neuronal excitation by this mechanism may lead to profound neuropathological alterations, including neurodegeneration and cell death.Neuropeptides are the largest and most diverse family of neurotransmitters. They are released from axon terminals and dendrites, diffuse to pre- or postsynaptic neuronal structures and activate membrane G-protein-coupled receptors. Prodynorphin (PDYN)-derived opioid peptides including dynorphin A (Dyn A), dynorphin B (Dyn B) and big dynorphin (Big Dyn) consisting of Dyn A and Dyn B are endogenous ligands for the κ-opioid receptor. Acting through this receptor, dynorphins regulate processing of pain and emotions, memory acquisition and modulate reward induced by addictive substances.^{1, 2, 3, 4} Furthermore, dynorphins may produce robust cellular and behavioral effects that are not mediated through opioid receptors.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} As evident from pharmacological, morphological, genetic and human neuropathological studies, these effects are generally pathological, including cell death, neurodegeneration, neurological dysfunctions and chronic pain. Big Dyn is the most active pathogenic peptide, which is about 10- to 100-fold more potent than Dyn A, whereas Dyn B does not produce non-opioid effects.^{16, 17, 22, 25} Big Dyn enhances activity of acid-sensing ion channel-1a (ASIC1a) and potentiates ASIC1a-mediated cell death in nanomolar concentrations^{30, 31} and, when administered intrathecally, induces characteristic nociceptive behavior at femtomolar doses.^{17, 22} Inhibition of endogenous Big Dyn degradation results in pathological pain, whereas prodynorphin (Pdyn) knockout mice do not maintain neuropathic pain.^{22, 32} Big Dyn differs from its constituents Dyn A and Dyn B in its unique pattern of non-opioid memory-enhancing, locomotor- and anxiolytic-like effects.²⁵Pathological role of dynorphins is emphasized by the identification of PDYN missense mutations that cause profound neurodegeneration in the human brain underlying the SCA23 (spinocerebellar ataxia type 23), a very rare dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder.^{27, 33} Most PDYN mutations are located in the Big Dyn domain, demonstrating its critical role in neurodegeneration. PDYN mutations result in marked elevation in dynorphin levels and increase in its pathogenic non-opioid activity.^{27, 34} Dominant-negative pathogenic effects of dynorphins are not produced through opioid receptors.ASIC1a, glutamate NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) and AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid)/kainate ion channels, and melanocortin and bradykinin B2 receptors have all been implicated as non-opioid dynorphin targets.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 35, 36} Multiplicity of these targets and their association with the cellular membrane suggest that their activation is a secondary event triggered by a primary interaction of dynorphins with the membrane. Dynorphins are among the most basic neuropeptides.^{37, 38} The basic nature is also a general property of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs) and amyloid peptides that act by inducing membrane perturbations, altering membrane curvature and causing pore formation that disrupts membrane-associated processes including ion fluxes across the membrane.³⁹ The similarity between dynorphins and these two peptide groups in overall charge and size suggests a similar mode of their interactions with membranes.In this study, we dissect the interactions of dynorphins with the cell membrane, the primary event in their non-receptor actions. Using fluorescence imaging, correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp techniques, we demonstrate that dynorphin peptides accumulate in the plasma membrane in live cells and cause a profound transient increase in cell membrane conductance. Membrane poration by endogenous neuropeptides may represent a novel mechanism of signal transduction in the brain. This mechanism may underlie effects of dynorphins under pathological conditions including chronic pain and tissue injury.