Aphid transmission of cauliflower mosaic virus: The role of the host plant

Transmission of plant viruses is the result of interactions between a given virus, the host plant and the vector. Most research has focused on molecular and cellular virus-vector interactions, and the host has only been regarded as a reservoir from which the virus is acquired by the vector more or less accidentally. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that the host can play a crucial role in transmission. Indeed, at least one virus, Cauliflower mosaic virus, exploits the host''s cellular pathways to form specialized intracellular structures that optimize virus uptake by the vector and hence transmission.Key words: virus, vector, host plant, transmission, interactionsTransmission is a step in a virus''s life cycle that is often neglected. Nonetheless, it is obvious that also this step is obligatory for a virus, as it could not maintain itself without dispersing to other hosts and infecting them. Most plant viruses are transmitted by insects, using two different strategies: “circulant transmission” where the virus, once taken up by the vector during feeding on an infected plant, passes from the intestine via the body lumen to the salivary glands and is finally inoculated with the saliva into a new host plant; the second strategy is “non-circulant transmission” where transmissible virus particles attach only to the exterior mouthpieces of the insect from which they are released into a new host. Whereas the first strategy obviously requires highly specific interactions between the virus and the vector to allow for passage of the virus through the vector, non-circulant transmission was initially thought of as a more or less accidental event, where virus sticks non-specifically to the mouthpieces. However, it becomes more and more evident that also non-circulant transmission is the result of sophisticated interactions between a given virus, a host and a vector. The vectors are most often aphids that, due to their non-destructive feeding behavior, are ideally suited as virus vectors. In fact, once landed on a plant, aphids first probe the prospective food source by short, only seconds lasting intracellular punctures in epidermis and mesophyll cells that do not even kill the punctured cells.¹ After these exploratory punctures and when they judge the plant as suited, the aphids insert their proboscis-like mouthpieces (stylets) into the phloem and feed from its sap for time spans that may exceed several hours. Depending on the tissues they infect, plant viruses can be acquired by aphids during either or only one of the two puncture phases. For example, Luteoviruses are only acquired from the vascular tissues,² whereas Cauliflower mosaic virus is acquired from both tissues.³Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) is one of the best studied viruses on what concerns non-circulant transmission, the most often used transmission mode employed by plant viruses. For its transmission, a transmissible complex must form that attaches to a protein receptor located in the stylets of the aphid.⁴ This complex is not only, as for some viruses, composed of the virus particle, but also, as for many non-circulantly transmitted plant viruses, of a viral helper protein that with one domain interacts with the virus particle and with another with the stylet receptor⁵ (Fig. 1A). The helper protein of CaMV, P2, seems to have no other function but to assist in transmission as CaMV mutants deleted of P2 are perfectly infectious but not transmissible.⁶ A puzzling fact is that P2 may be acquired independently of the virus particle, meaning that it alone can bind to the stylet receptor and that virus particles either attach concomitantly with P2 onto the stylets or later attach to pre-bound P2. This has consequences for the composition of the transmitted viral population as it can be compiled of virus particles originating from the same cell from which P2 was acquired, but also from other cells and even sieve tubes that themselves do not contain P2.³ In fact, this potentially sequential acquisition mode of CaMV by the vector is controlled by the intracellular⁷ and tissue-specific localization of P2 that is only found in epidermis and parenchyma cells.³ In these cells, P2 localizes exclusively in a single viral inclusion, the transmission body, that has been proposed and recently been shown to be specialized for transmission:^8–10 if this structure does not form, CaMV can not be taken up by the aphid, even if functional P2 is present in the infected cell.Open in a separate windowFigure 1(A) The different strategies of non-circulant transmission: Viruses (V) using the capsid strategy (CS) attach directly to a receptor (R) in the tip of the a proboscis forming aphid stylets (blue), whereas in the helper strategy (HS) this interaction is mediated by the viral helper protein (H) that binds the virus particle to the receptor. Note that the helper protein can bind independently of the virus to the stylets. Whether the same receptor is used by different viruses as presented in the schema, is not known. (B) A turnip protoplast transfected with CaMV was double-labelled late in infection for CaMV helper protein P2 (red) and the marker protein for the virus factories P6 (green). It is visible that P2 localizes in a single, large transmission body, whereas the numerous virus factories are devoid of P2 (Colocalization would be revealed by yellowish color (M) in this superposition). (C and D) Turnip protoplasts were cotransfected with CaMV and TBK5-GFP and immunolabelled for P2 (red) and TBK5 was detected by GFP fluorescence. (C) shows a cell early in infection, where P2 and TBK5-GFP colocalize on a network that we identified as the microtubule cytoskeleton (unpublished data). (D) shows a cell later in infection where P2 and TBK5-GFP colocalize, as indicated by the yellowish color, in a transmission body. Note that TBK5-GFP also strongly labels the nucleus (N).This posed the interesting question how the transmission body forms during infection because elucidating this mechanism would show that CaMV hijacks cellular pathways for the sole purpose to ensure its transmission. It was known that besides the single transmission body a second type of viral inclusion bodies is found in infected cells: the numerous “electron-dense inclusions” that are assumed to be the virus factories (Fig. 1B) where all viral synthesis occurs¹¹ and where most virus particles accumulate. However, P2 was never described in the factories, presenting the paradox: if it is translated in the factories why is it not found there? Of different possible scenarios we chose to test the hypothesis that P2 is produced in the factories and then exported. Protoplasts were transfected with CaMV particles and kinetics of P2 accumulation followed by immunofluorescence. The results showed that P2 is indeed translated in the viral factories but then associates temporally with microtubules before finally condensing into a single transmission body. Also the other known components of the transmission body, the viral protein P3 and to a lesser degree, some virus particles, followed the same route from viral factories to the transmission body.Experiments with cytoskeleton drugs confirmed that transient localization of transmission body components with microtubules, but not with actin filaments, is necessary for transmission body formation. The results also indicated that both microtubules and actin filaments are apparently not required for other steps of the intracellular infection cycle because formation of viral factories was only slightly inhibited by the drugs.The results show that CaMV specifically uses the microtubule cytoskeleton to form the transmission body and thus enable vector transmission. Consequently, non-circulant transmission of at least this virus is not a random event where the vector takes up some transmissible complexes by chance. It is rather the result of highly specific interactions, where the virus “intentionally” (ab)uses cellular pathways to optimize acquisition by the vector, and this long before arrival of the latter on an infected plant.A lot of questions remain open, though. Are P2 and the other components of the transmission body actively transported on microtubules, or is their transient colocalization with microtubules part of an alternative transport mode? We started to more closely examine interaction between P2 and microtubules and privileged the hypothesis that the protein might be transported by a motor activity on microtubules. As preliminary data indicated that P2 does not possess an innate translocating activity, we looked for a cellular motor protein and tested as a candidate the kinesin TBK5.¹² This transport protein is, when overexpressed, able to bundle microtubules into a single focus, just as transmission bodies are singular structures in the cell. When healthy protoplasts were cotransfected with TBK5 and CaMV, TBK5 localized transiently with P2 on microtubules and in transmission bodies (Fig. 1C and D). This might be taken as the first evidence that a kinesin might be involved in formation of transmission bodies, but more experimentation is needed to confirm this hypothesis.A by far more important question is: Have also other viruses, whether from the plant or the animal kingdoms, that are noncirculantly (or mechanically, as animal virologists call this mode of transmission) transmitted, developed similar strategies that fine-tune interactions between the host and the virus to prepare and perfect transmission?     

A role for plant microtubules in the formation of transmission-specific inclusion bodies of Cauliflower mosaic virus

Interactions between microtubules and viruses play important roles in viral infection. The best-characterized examples involve transport of animal viruses by microtubules to the nucleus or other intracellular destinations. In plant viruses, most work to date has focused on interaction between viral movement proteins and the cytoskeleton, which is thought to be involved in viral cell-to-cell spread. We show here, in Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV)-infected plant cells, that viral electron-lucent inclusion bodies (ELIBs), whose only known function is vector transmission, require intact microtubules for their efficient formation. The kinetics of the formation of CaMV-related inclusion bodies in transfected protoplasts showed that ELIBs represent newly emerging structures, appearing at late stages of the intracellular viral life cycle. Viral proteins P2 and P3 are first produced in multiple electron-dense inclusion bodies, and are later specifically exported to transiently co-localize with microtubules, before concentrating in a single, massive ELIB in each infected cell. Treatments with cytoskeleton-affecting drugs suggested that P2 and P3 might be actively transported on microtubules, by as yet unknown motors. In addition to providing information on the intracellular life cycle of CaMV, our results show that specific interactions between host cell and virus may be dedicated to a later role in vector transmission. More generally, they indicate a new unexpected function for plant cell microtubules in the virus life cycle, demonstrating that microtubules act not only on immediate intracellular or intra-host phenomena, but also on processes ultimately controlling inter-host transmission.     

Structure of the mature P3-virus particle complex of cauliflower mosaic virus revealed by cryo-electron microscopy

The cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) has an icosahedral capsid composed of the viral protein P4. The viral product P3 is a multifunctional protein closely associated with the virus particle within host cells. The best-characterized function of P3 is its implication in CaMV plant-to-plant transmission by aphid vectors, involving a P3-virion complex. In this transmission process, the viral protein P2 attaches to virion-bound P3, and creates a molecular bridge between the virus and a putative receptor in the aphid's stylets. Recently, the virion-bound P3 has been suggested to participate in cell-to-cell or long-distance movement of CaMV within the host plant. Thus, as new data accumulate, the importance of the P3-virion complex during the virus life-cycle is becoming more and more evident. To provide a first insight into the knowledge of the transmission process of the virus, we determined the 3D structures of native and P3-decorated virions by cryo-electron microscopy and computer image processing. By difference mapping and biochemical analysis, we show that P3 forms a network around the capsomers and we propose a structural model for the binding of P3 to CaMV capsid in which its C terminus is anchored deeply in the inner shell of the virion, while the N-terminal extremity is facing out of the CaMV capsid, forming dimers by coiled-coil interactions. Our results combined with existing data reinforce the hypothesis that this coiled-coil N-terminal region of P3 could coordinate several functions during the virus life-cycle, such as cell-to-cell movement and aphid-transmission.     

A single amino acid position in the helper component of cauliflower mosaic virus can change the spectrum of transmitting vector species

Viruses frequently use insect vectors to effect rapid spread through host populations. In plant viruses, vector transmission is the major mode of transmission, used by nearly 80% of species described to date. Despite the importance of this phenomenon in epidemiology, the specificity of the virus-vector relationship is poorly understood at both the molecular and the evolutionary level, and very limited data are available on the precise viral protein motifs that control specificity. Here, using the aphid-transmitted Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) as a biological model, we confirm that the "noncirculative" mode of transmission dominant in plant viruses (designated "mechanical vector transmission" in animal viruses) involves extremely specific virus-vector recognition, and we identify an amino acid position in the "helper component" (HC) protein of CaMV involved in such recognition. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed that changing the residue at this position can differentially affect transmission rates obtained with various aphid species, thus modifying the spectrum of vector species for CaMV. Most interestingly, in a virus line transmitted by a single vector species, we observed the rapid appearance of a spontaneous mutant specifically losing its transmissibility by another aphid species. Hence, in addition to the first identification of an HC motif directly involved in specific vector recognition, we demonstrate that change of a virus to a different vector species requires only a single mutation and can occur rapidly and spontaneously.     

Genome packaging of reovirus is mediated by the scaffolding property of the microtubule network

Reovirus replication occurs in the cytoplasm of the host cell, in virally induced mini‐organelles called virus factories. On the basis of the serotype of the virus, the virus factories can manifest as filamentous (type 1 Lang strain) or globular structures (type 3 Dearing strain). The filamentous factories morphology is dependent on the microtubule cytoskeleton; however, the exact function of the microtubule network in virus replication remains unknown. Using a combination of fluorescent microscopy, electron microscopy, and tomography of high‐pressure frozen and freeze‐substituted cells, we determined the ultrastructural organisation of reovirus factories. Cells infected with the reovirus microtubule‐dependent strain display paracrystalline arrays of progeny virions resulting from their tiered organisation around microtubule filaments. On the contrary, in cells infected with the microtubule‐independent strain, progeny virions lacked organisation. Conversely to the microtubule‐dependent strain, around half of the viral particles present in these viral factories did not contain genomes (genome‐less particles). Complementarily, interference with the microtubule filaments in cells infected with the microtubule‐dependent strain resulted in a significant increase of genome‐less particle number. This decrease of genome packaging efficiency could be rescued by rerouting viral factories on the actin cytoskeleton. These findings demonstrate that the scaffolding properties of the microtubule, and not biochemical nature of tubulin, are critical determinants for reovirus efficient genome packaging. This work establishes, for the first time, a functional correlation between ultrastructural organisation of reovirus factories with genome packaging efficiency and provides novel information on how viruses coordinate assembly of progeny particles.     

Formation of orthopoxvirus cytoplasmic A-type inclusion bodies and embedding of virions are dynamic processes requiring microtubules

In cells infected with some orthopoxviruses, numerous mature virions (MVs) become embedded within large, cytoplasmic A-type inclusions (ATIs) that can protect infectivity after cell lysis. ATIs are composed of an abundant viral protein called ATIp, which is truncated in orthopoxviruses such as vaccinia virus (VACV) that do not form ATIs. To study ATI formation and occlusion of MVs within ATIs, we used recombinant VACVs that express the cowpox full-length ATIp or we transfected plasmids encoding ATIp into cells infected with VACV, enabling ATI formation. ATI enlargement and MV embedment required continued protein synthesis and an intact microtubular network. For live imaging of ATIs and MVs, plasmids expressing mCherry fluorescent protein fused to ATIp were transfected into cells infected with VACV expressing the viral core protein A4 fused to yellow fluorescent protein. ATIs appeared as dynamic, mobile bodies that enlarged by multiple coalescence events, which could be prevented by disrupting microtubules. Coalescence of ATIs was confirmed in cells infected with cowpox virus. MVs were predominantly at the periphery of ATIs early in infection. We determined that coalescence contributed to the distribution of MVs within ATIs and that microtubule-disrupting drugs abrogated coalescence-mediated MV embedment. In addition, MVs were shown to move from viral factories at speeds consistent with microtubular transport to the peripheries of ATIs, whereas disruption of microtubules prevented such trafficking. The data indicate an important role for microtubules in the coalescence of ATIs into larger structures, transport of MVs to ATIs, and embedment of MVs within the ATI matrix.     

Cauliflower mosaic virus protein P6-TAV plays a major role in alteration of aphid vector feeding behaviour but not performance on infected Arabidopsis

Emerging evidence suggests that viral infection modifies host plant traits that in turn alter behaviour and performance of vectors colonizing the plants in a way conducive for transmission of both nonpersistent and persistent viruses. Similar evidence for semipersistent viruses like cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) is scarce. Here we compared the effects of Arabidopsis infection with mild (CM) and severe (JI) CaMV isolates on the feeding behaviour (recorded by the electrical penetration graph technique) and fecundity of the aphid vector Myzus persicae. Compared to mock-inoculated plants, feeding behaviour was altered similarly on CM- and JI-infected plants, but only aphids on JI-infected plants had reduced fecundity. To evaluate the role of the multifunctional CaMV protein P6-TAV, aphid feeding behaviour and fecundity were tested on transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing wild-type (wt) and mutant versions of P6-TAV. In contrast to viral infection, aphid fecundity was unchanged on all transgenic lines, suggesting that other viral factors compromise fecundity. Aphid feeding behaviour was modified on wt P6-CM-, but not on wt P6-JI-expressing plants. Analysis of plants expressing P6 mutants identified N-terminal P6 domains contributing to modification of feeding behaviour. Taken together, we show that CaMV infection can modify both aphid fecundity and feeding behaviour and that P6 is only involved in the latter.     

The acquisition of a caulimovirus by different aphid species: comparison with a potyvirus

The acquisition and transmission of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) by six aphid species and three clones of aphids was studied and compared with that of turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) with Myzus persicae. Two clones of Aphis fabae were unable to transmit CaMV, but the other species, Acyrthosiphon pisum, Brevicoryne brassicae, Megoura viciae, M. persicae and Rhopalosiphum padi transmitted in a bior multi-phasic manner. There was no statistical evidence of a bimodal transmission pattern. R. padi is recorded as a vector of CaMV for the first time. The transmission efficiency of CaMV varied with time of acquisition and suggested that accumulation of the virus occurred with two peaks of efficiency within the anterior region of the insect gut. The time at which these two peaks occurred varied between the species, but the basic pattern was common to all transmitting aphid species in this study. This pattern contrasted with that of TuMV. The transmission data are discussed in terms of bimodal transmission, the influence of feeding behaviour, the role of a helper protein associated with both TuMV and CaMV and the evidence for site specific attachment of CaMV.     

Transport of African swine fever virus from assembly sites to the plasma membrane is dependent on microtubules and conventional kinesin

African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a large DNA virus that assembles in perinuclear viral factories located close to the microtubule organizing center. In this study, we have investigated the mechanism by which ASFV reaches the cell surface from the site of assembly. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that at 16 h postinfection, mature virions were aligned along microtubules. Furthermore, virus movement to the cell periphery was inhibited when microtubules were depolymerized by nocodazole. In addition, ASFV infection resulted in the increased acetylation of microtubules as well as their protection against depolymerization by nocodazole. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed that conventional kinesin was recruited to virus factories and to a large fraction of virus particles in the cytoplasm. Consistent with a role for conventional kinesin during ASFV egress to the cell periphery, overexpression of the cargo-binding domain of the kinesin light chain severely inhibited the movement of particles to the plasma membrane. Based on our observations, we propose that ASFV is recognized as cargo by conventional kinesin and uses this plus-end microtubule motor to move from perinuclear assembly sites to the plasma membrane.     

The cauliflower mosaic virus virion-associated protein is dispensable for viral replication in single cells

Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) open reading frame III (ORF III) codes for a virion-associated protein (Vap), which is one of two viral proteins essential for aphid transmission. However, unlike the aphid transmission factor encoded by CaMV ORF II, Vap is also essential for systemic infection, suggesting that it is a multifunctional protein. To elucidate the additional function or functions of Vap, we tested the replication of noninfectious ORF III-defective mutants in transfected turnip protoplasts. PCR and Western blot analyses revealed that CaMV replication had occurred with an efficiency similar to that of wild-type virus and without leading to reversions. Electron microscopic examination revealed that an ORF III frameshift mutant formed normally structured virions. These results demonstrate that Vap is dispensable for replication in single cells and is not essential for virion morphogenesis. Analysis of inoculated turnip leaves showed that the ORF III frameshift mutant does not cause any detectable local infection. These results are strongly indicative of a role for Vap in virus movement.     

Plant infection by two different viruses induce contrasting changes of vectors fitness and behavior

Insect-vectored plant viruses can induce changes in plant phenotypes,thus influencing plant-vector interactions in a way that may promote their dispersal according to their mode of transmission (i.e.,circulative vs.noncirculative).This indirect vector manipulation requires host-virus-vector coevolution and would thus be effective solely in very specific plant-virus-vector species associations.Some studies suggest this manipulation may depend on multiple factors relative to various intrinsic characteristics of vectors such as transmission efficiency.In anintegrative study,we tested the effects of infection of the Brassicaceae Camelina sativa with the noncirculative Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV)or the circulative Turnip yellows virus (TuYV)on the host-plant colonization of two aphid species differing in their virus transmission efficiency:the polyphagous Myzus persicae,efficient vector of both viruses,and the Brassicaceae specialist Brevicoryne brassicae,poor vector of TuYV and efficient vector of CaMV.Results confirmed the important role of virus mode of transmission as plant-mediated effects of CaMV on the two aphid species induced negative alterations of feeding behavior (i.e.,decreased phloem sap ingestion)and performance that were both conducive for virus fitness by promoting dispersion after a rapid acquisition.In addition,virus transmission efficiency may also play a role in vector manipulation by viruses as only the responses of the efficient vector to plant-mediated effects of TuYV,that is,enhanced feeding behavior and performances,were favorable to their acquisition and further dispersal.Altogether,this work demonstrated that vector transmission efficiency also has to be considered when studying the mechanisms underlying vector manipulation by viruses.Our results also re- inforce the idea that vector manipulation requires coevolution between plant,virus and vector.     

Visualization and characterization of the intracellular movement of vaccinia virus intracellular mature virions

Previous work indicated that vaccinia intracellular mature virus (IMV) utilizes microtubules to move from the viral factory to the site of intracellular envelopment and that expression of the viral A27 protein is required for this transport. To investigate further the role of A27 in IMV intracellular transport, a recombinant vaccinia virus was constructed that had the A27L gene deleted and expressed a yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-A4 chimera in place of the normal A4 protein. The resulting recombinant, vYFP-A4/DeltaA27, produced relatively normal quantities of virus in a one-step growth curve but had a small plaque phenotype. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that vYFP-A4/DeltaA27 was severely defective in envelope virus production. Despite the absence of A27, live digital video fluorescent microscopy visualized YFP-labeled IMV movement in cells infected with the recombinant. Virion movement approached 3 mum/s and was sensitive to the microtubule depolymerizing drug nocodazole. In addition, IMV could be discerned transiting away from and back towards viral factories. Immunofluorescent staining determined that the distance traveled by A27-deficient virions was sufficient for transport to the site of envelopment. These results indicate that IMVs are capable of bidirectional movement on microtubules, suggesting that they are able to interact with both kinesin and dynein microtubule motors in the absence of A27 and that the distance traveled is sufficient to deliver IMV to the site of wrapping.     

VAPA, an innovative "virus-acquisition phenotyping assay" opens new horizons in research into the vector-transmission of plant viruses

Host-to-host transmission--a key step in plant virus infection cycles--is ensured predominantly by vectors, especially aphids and related insects. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms of virus acquisition, which is critical to vector-transmission, might help to design future virus control strategies, because any newly discovered molecular or cellular process is a potential target for hampering viral spread within host populations. With this aim in mind, an aphid membrane-feeding assay was developed where aphids transmitted two non-circulative viruses [cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) and turnip mosaic virus] from infected protoplasts. In this assay, virus acquisition occurs exclusively from living cells. Most interestingly, we also show that CaMV is less efficiently transmitted by aphids in the presence of oryzalin--a microtubule-depolymerising drug. The example presented here demonstrates that our technically simple "virus-acquisition phenotyping assay" (VAPA) provides a first opportunity to implement correlative studies relating the physiological state of infected plant cells to vector-transmission efficiency.     

Aphid transmission of nanoviruses

The genus Nanovirus consists of plant viruses that predominantly infect legumes leading to devastating crop losses. Nanoviruses are transmitted by various aphid species. The transmission occurs in a circulative nonpropagative manner. It was long suspected that a virus-encoded helper factor would be needed for successful transmission by aphids. Recently, a helper factor was identified as the nanovirus-encoded nuclear shuttle protein (NSP). The mode of action of NSP is currently unknown in contrast to helper factors from other plant viruses that, for example, facilitate binding of virus particles to receptors within the aphids' stylets. In this review, we are summarizing the current knowledge about nanovirus–aphid vector interactions.     

Interaction between the open reading frame III product and the coat protein is required for transmission of cauliflower mosaic virus by aphids

Transmission of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) by aphids requires two viral nonstructural proteins, the open reading frame (ORF) II and ORF III products (P2 and P3). An interaction between a C-terminal domain of P2 and an N-terminal domain of P3 is essential for transmission. Purified particles of CaMV are efficiently transmitted only if aphids, previously fed a P2-containing solution, are allowed to acquire a preincubated mixture of P3 and virions in a second feed, thus suggesting a direct interaction between P3 and coat protein. Herein we demonstrate that P3 directly interacts with purified viral particles and unassembled coat protein without the need for any other factor and that P3 mediates the association of P2 with purified virus particles. The interaction domain of P3 is located in its C-terminal half, downstream of the P3-P2 interaction domain but overlapping a region which binds nucleic acids. Mutagenesis of P3 which interferes with the interaction between P3 and virions is correlated with the loss of transmission by aphids. Taken together, our results demonstrate that P3 plays a crucial role in the formation of the CaMV transmissible complex by serving as a bridge between P2 and virus particles.     

Plant virus HC-Pro is a determinant of eriophyid mite transmission

The eriophyid mite transmitted Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV; genus Tritimovirus, family Potyviridae) shares a common genome organization with aphid transmitted species of the genus Potyvirus. Although both tritimoviruses and potyviruses encode helper component-proteinase (HC-Pro) homologues (required for nonpersistent aphid transmission of potyviruses), sequence conservation is low (amino acid identity, approximately 16%), and a role for HC-Pro in semipersistent transmission of WSMV by the wheat curl mite (Aceria tosichella [Keifer]) has not been investigated. Wheat curl mite transmissibility was abolished by replacement of WSMV HC-Pro with homologues of an aphid transmitted potyvirus (Turnip mosaic virus), a rymovirus (Agropyron mosaic virus) vectored by a different eriophyid mite, or a closely related tritimovirus (Oat necrotic mottle virus; ONMV) with no known vector. In contrast, both WSMV-Sidney 81 and a chimeric WSMV genome bearing HC-Pro of a divergent strain (WSMV-El Batán 3; 86% amino acid sequence identity) were efficiently transmitted by A. tosichella. Replacing portions of WSMV-Sidney 81 HC-Pro with the corresponding regions from ONMV showed that determinants of wheat curl mite transmission map to the 5'-proximal half of HC-Pro. WSMV genomes bearing HC-Pro of heterologous species retained the ability to form virions, indicating that loss of vector transmissibility was not a result of failure to encapsidate. Although titer in systemically infected leaves was reduced for all chimeric genomes relative to WSMV-Sidney 81, titer was not correlated with loss of vector transmissibility. Collectively, these results demonstrate for the first time that HC-Pro is required for virus transmission by a vector other than aphids.     

Small rho GTPases and cholesterol biosynthetic pathway intermediates in African swine fever virus infection

The integrity of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway is required for efficient African swine fever virus (ASFV) infection. Incorporation of prenyl groups into Rho GTPases plays a key role in several stages of ASFV infection, since both geranylgeranyl and farnesyl pyrophosphates are required at different infection steps. We found that Rho GTPase inhibition impaired virus morphogenesis and resulted in an abnormal viral factory size with the accumulation of envelope precursors and immature virions. Furthermore, abundant defective virions reached the plasma membrane, and filopodia formation in exocytosis was abrogated. Rac1 was activated at early ASFV infection stages, coincident with microtubule acetylation, a process that stabilizes microtubules for virus transport. Rac1 inhibition did not affect the viral entry step itself but impaired subsequent virus production. We found that specific Rac1 inhibition impaired viral induced microtubule acetylation and viral intracellular transport. These findings highlight that viral infection is the result of a carefully orchestrated modulation of Rho family GTPase activity within the host cell; this modulation results critical for virus morphogenesis and in turn, triggers cytoskeleton remodeling, such as microtubule stabilization for viral transport during early infection.     

Hepatitis C virus core protein induces lipid droplet redistribution in a microtubule- and dynein-dependent manner

Attachment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein to lipid droplets (LDs) is linked to release of infectious progeny from infected cells. Core progressively coats the entire LD surface from a unique site on the organelle, and this process coincides with LD aggregation around the nucleus. We demonstrate that LD redistribution requires only core protein and is accompanied by reduced abundance of adipocyte differentiation-related protein (ADRP) on LD surfaces. Using small hairpin RNA technology, we show that knock down of ADRP has a similar phenotypic effect on LD redistribution. Hence, ADRP is crucial to maintain a disperse intracellular distribution of LDs. From additional experimental evidence, LDs are associated with microtubules and aggregate principally around the microtubule-organizing centre in HCV-infected cells. Disrupting the microtubule network or microinjecting anti-dynein antibody prevented core-mediated LD redistribution. Moreover, microtubule disruption reduced virus titres, implicating transport networks in virus assembly and release. We propose that the presence of core on LDs favours their movement towards the nucleus, possibly to increase the probability of interaction between sites of HCV RNA replication and virion assembly.     

Stabilization of cauliflower mosaic virus P3 tetramer by covalent linkage

Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) open reading frame (ORF) III encodes a 15 kDa protein (P3) that is indispensable for viral infectivity. Although P3 has been shown to be a prerequisite for CaMV aphid transmission, its role in viral replication remains unknown. We previously showed that P3 forms a tetramer in planta and that P3 tetramer co-sediments with viral coat protein on sucrose gradient centrifugation, suggesting that a tetramer may be the functional form of P3. We presumed that disulfide bonds were involved in tetramer formation because 1) the tetramer was detected by Western blotting after electrophoresis under non-reducing conditions, and 2) the cysteine-X-cysteine motif is well conserved in CaMV P3 and P3 homologues among Caulimoviruses. Therefore we mutated either or both of the cysteine residues of CaMV P3. The mutant viruses were infectious and accumulated to a similar extent as the wild-type. An analysis of mutant proteins confirmed that the wild-type P3 molecules in the tetramer are covalently bound with one another through disulfide bonds. It was also suggested that mutant proteins are less stable than wild-type protein in planta. Furthermore, sedimentation study suggested that the disulfide bonds are involved in stable association of P3 with CaMV virions or virion-like particles, or both. The mutant viruses could be transmitted by aphids. These results suggested that the covalent bonds in P3 tetramer are dispensable for biological activity of P3 under experimental situations and may have some biological significance in natural infection in the field.     

Cucurbit aphid‐borne yellows virus (CABYV) modifies the alighting,settling and probing behaviour of its vector Aphis gossypii favouring its own spread

Plant pathogens are able to influence the behaviour and fitness of their vectors in such a way that changes in plant–pathogen–vector interactions can affect their transmission. Such influence can be direct or indirect, depending on whether it is mediated by the presence of the pathogen in the vector's body or by host changes as a consequence of pathogen infection. We report the effect that the persistently aphid‐transmitted Cucurbit aphid‐borne yellows virus (CABYV, Polerovirus) can induce on the alighting, settling and probing behaviour activities of its vector, the cotton aphid Aphis gossypii. Only minor direct changes on aphid feeding behaviour were observed when viruliferous aphids fed on non‐infected plants. However, the feeding behaviour of non‐viruliferous aphids was very different on CABYV‐infected than on non‐infected plants. Non‐viruliferous aphids spent longer time feeding from the phloem in CABYV‐infected plants compared to non‐infected plants, suggesting that CABYV indirectly manipulates aphid feeding behaviour through its shared host plant in order to favour viral acquisition. Viruliferous aphids showed a clear preference for non‐infected over CABYV‐infected plants at short and long time, while such behaviour was not observed for non‐viruliferous aphids. Overall, our results indicate that CABYV induces changes in its host plant that modifies aphid feeding behaviour in a way that virus acquisition from infected plants is enhanced. Once the aphids become viruliferous they prefer to settle on healthy plants, leading to optimise the transmission and spread of this phloem‐limited virus.