Interactions between inhibin, oestradiol and progesterone in the control of gonadotrophin secretion in the ewe

Experiments were carried out to test the hypothesis that inhibin and oestradiol act synergistically to inhibit the secretion of FSH, to test for effects of progesterone, and to compare the FSH and LH responses to ovarian feedback. In Exp. 1, with 11 ovariectomized and 12 intact Romanov ewes during the anoestrous season, doses of oestradiol (administered by means of subcutaneous implants) that restored normal LH pulse frequencies were insufficient to restore normal concentrations of FSH. In Exp. 2, with 48 ovariectomized Welsh Mountain ewes during the breeding season, a factorial design with 4 ewes per cell was used to assess the responses in LH and FSH to 3 doses of oestradiol (s.c. implants) and 4 doses of bovine follicular fluid ('inhibin', 0.2-1.6 ml s.c. every 8 h). This was done initially in the absence of progesterone and then after 7 days of treatment with progesterone (s.c. implants). Analysis of variance revealed a significant synergistic interaction between oestradiol and inhibin on the plasma concentrations of FSH. Progesterone had little effect. In contrast, there was a significant synergistic interaction between oestradiol and progesterone on the concentrations of LH. 'Inhibin' also inhibited LH secretion but this effect was independent of the two steroids. We conclude that there are basic differences in the way that ovarian feedback acts to control the secretion of LH and FSH in the ewe. FSH secretion appears to be primarily controlled by the synergistic action of oestradiol and inhibin on the anterior pituitary gland, while the secretion of LH is inhibited during the follicular phase by an effect of oestrogen at pituitary level and during the luteal phase by the synergistic action of oestradiol and progesterone at the hypothalamic level. Inhibin, or another non-steroidal factor in follicular fluid, may also play a minor role in the control of LH secretion.     

Prolactin and LH release in response to LH-RH and TRH in ewes during dioestrus, pregnancy and post partum

With advancing pregnancy in the ewe there was a marked decline in plasma LH concentrations and pituitary LH-RH responsiveness (integrated LH release) and a marked increase in plasma prolactin values and pituitary TRH responsiveness (integrated prolactin release). In lactating ewes plasma LH levels and pituitary LH-RH responsiveness had returned to values found in the luteal phase of the normal cycle by 21 days post partum, whereas at 42 days post partum prolactin levels were still high. No interaction between TRH and LH-RH on prolactin and LH release in dioestrous ewes was detected. In non-pregnant ewes plasma prolactin levels were significantly higher in June than in January but TRH responsiveness was similar. It is concluded that, in sheep, pituitary LH secretion recovers more rapidly from the chronic negative feedback effect of oestrogens and progesterone in pregnancy than prolactin secretion recovers from the chronic positive feedback effects of oestrogens. This finding may be a contributory factor in the resistance to resumption of breeding activity.     

Effects of oestradiol on LH, FSH and prolactin in ovariectomized ewes

This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the rate (dose/time) at which oestradiol-17 beta (oestradiol) is presented to the hypothalamo-pituitary axis influences secretion of LH, FSH and prolactin. A computer-controlled infusion system was used to produce linearly increasing serum concentrations of oestradiol in ovariectomized ewes over a period of 60 h. Serum samples were collected from ewes every 2 h from 8 h before to 92 h after start of infusion, and assayed for oestradiol, LH, FSH and prolactin. Rates of oestradiol increase were categorized into high (0.61-1.78 pg/h), medium (0.13-0.60 pg/h) and low (0.01-0.12 pg/h). Ewes receiving high rates of oestradiol (N = 11) responded with a surge of LH 12.7 +/- 2.0 h after oestradiol began to increase, whereas ewes receiving medium (N = 15) and low (N = 11) rates of oestradiol responded with a surge of LH at 19.4 +/- 1.7 and 30.9 +/- 2.0 h, respectively. None of the surges of LH was accompanied by a surge of FSH. Serum concentrations of FSH decreased and prolactin increased in ewes receiving high and medium rates of oestradiol, when compared to saline-infused ewes (N = 8; P less than 0.05). We conclude that rate of increase in serum concentrations of oestradiol controls the time of the surge of LH and secretion of prolactin and FSH in ovariectomized ewes. We also suggest that the mechanism by which oestradiol induces a surge of LH may be different from the mechanism by which oestradiol induces a surge of FSH.     

Suppression of follicular development after chronic LHRH immunoneutralization in the ewe

Active immunization of 6 Damline ewes against LHRH during seasonal anoestrus resulted in an inhibition of ovarian cyclicity throughout 2 subsequent breeding seasons. This was associated with a significant suppression of plasma LH and FSH concentrations but no significant effect on prolactin. The ovaries of LHRH-immunized ewes 30 months after primary immunization contained no follicles greater than 2.5 mm in diameter and a greater proportion of follicles between 1 and 2 mm were atretic than in control ewes (N = 8). In-vitro production of testosterone and androstenedione were similar in follicles 1-2 mm in both control and LHRH-immunized ewes (N = 6) and all had little or no ability to secrete oestradiol. However, basal and hCG-stimulated progesterone secretion was suppressed in the follicles from LHRH-immunized ewes. These results show that follicular development beyond 2.5 mm in the ewe is dependent on adequate stimulation by both LH and FSH.     

Steroid secretion rates and plasma binding activity in androstenedione-immune ewes with an autotransplanted ovary

Mature Merino ewes in which the left ovary and its vascular pedicle had been autotransplanted to the neck were divided into control (N = 5) and immunized groups (N = 6). The immunized ewes were treated (2 ml s.c.) with Fecundin 1 and 4 weeks before the start of blood sampling. Ovarian and jugular venous blood was collected every 10 min at two stages of the follicular phase (21-27 h and 38-42 h after i.m. injection of 125 micrograms of a prostaglandin (PG) analogue) and during the mid-luteal phase (8 h at 15-min intervals). The ewes were monitored regularly for luteal function and preovulatory LH surges. Hormone concentrations and anti-androstenedione titres were assayed by RIA and ovarian secretion rates of oestradiol-17 beta, progesterone and androstenedione were determined. After the booster immunization, progesterone increased simultaneously with titre in immunized ewes, reaching 30 ng/ml at the time of PG injection when median titre was 1:10,000. All ewes responded to PG with LH surges 42-72 h later: 2 of the immunized ewes then had a second LH surge within 3-4 days at a time when peripheral progesterone values were 2-3 ng/ml. The frequency of steroid and LH pulses was greater in immunized ewes (P less than 0.05) during the luteal phase but not the follicular phase. The secretion rate of androstenedione was 6-10 times greater (19-37 ng/min; P less than 0.001) in immunized ewes at all sampling stages. Progesterone secretion rates were 3 times greater (16 micrograms/min; P less than 0.001) during the luteal phase in immunized ewes. The amplitude of oestradiol pulses was significantly reduced in immunized ewes (4.8 vs 2.1 ng/min at +24 h and 6.5 vs 2.8 ng/min at +40 h in control and immunized ewes, respectively: P less than 0.05) during the follicular phase. However, the mean secretion rate of oestradiol at each phase of the cycle was not significantly different between treatment groups. Analysis of bound and free steroid using polyethylene glycol showed that greater than 98% of peripheral and ovarian venous androstenedione and 86% of peripheral progesterone was bound in immunized ewes but there was no appreciable binding (less than 0.1%) in control ewes. Similarly, 50% of ovarian venous oestradiol was bound in immunized ewes compared to 15% in control ewes. We conclude that immunization against androstenedione increases the secretion rate of androstenedione and progesterone but not of oestradiol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Oestradiol and the preovulatory surges of luteinising hormone and follicle stimulating hormone in ewes during the breeding season and transition into anoestrus

This study was designed to see if giving exogenous oestradiol, during the follicular phase of the oestrous cycle of intact ewes, during the breeding season or transition into anoestrus, would alter the occurrence, timing or magnitude of the preovulatory surge of secretion of luteinising hormone (LH) or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). During the breeding season and the time of transition, separate groups of ewes were infused (intravenously) with either saline (30 ml h⁻¹; n = 6) or oestradiol in saline (n = 6) for 30 h. Infusion started 12 h after removal of progestin-containing intravaginal sponges that had been in place for 12 days. The initial dose of oestradiol was 0.02 μg h⁻¹; this was doubled every 4 h for 20 h, followed by every 5 h up to 30 h, to reach a maximum of 1.5 μg h⁻¹. Following progestin removal during the breeding season, peak serum concentrations of oestradiol in control ewes were 10.31 ± 1.04 pg ml⁻¹, at 49.60 ± 3.40 h after progestin removal. There was no obvious peak during transition, but at a time after progestin removal equivalent to the time of the oestradiol peak in ewes at mid breeding season, oestradiol concentrations were 6.70 ± 1.14 pg ml⁻¹ in ewes in transition (P < 0.05). In oestradiol treated ewes, peak serum oestradiol concentrations (24.8 ± 2.1 pg ml⁻¹) and time to peak (41.00 ± 0.05 h) did not differ between seasons (P > 0.05). During the breeding season, all six control ewes and four of six ewes given oestradiol showed oestrus with LH and FSH surges. The two ewes not showing oestrus did not respond to oestrus synchronisation and had persistently high serum concentrations of progesterone. During transition, three of six control ewes showed oestrus but only two had LH and FSH surges; all oestradiol treated ewes showed oestrus and gonadotrophin surges (P < 0.05). The timing and magnitude of LH and FSH surges did not vary with treatment or season. In blood samples collected every 12 min for 6 h, from 12 h after the start of oestradiol infusion, mean serum concentrations of LH and LH pulse frequency were lower in control ewes during transition than during mid breeding season (P < 0.05). Oestradiol treatment resulted in lower mean serum concentrations of LH in season and lower LH pulse frequency in transition (P < 0.05). We concluded that enhancing the height of the preovulatory peak in serum concentrations of oestradiol during the breeding season did not alter the timing or the magnitude of the preovulatory surge of LH and FSH secretion and that at transition into anoestrus, oestradiol can induce oestrus and the surge release of LH and FSH as effectively as during the breeding season.     

FACTORS AFFECTING THE SECRETION OF LUTEINIZING HORMONE IN THE EWE

(1) Luteinizing hormone (LH) is secreted as discrete pulses throughout all stages of the reproductive cycle of the ewe, including pre-pubertal, seasonal and lactational anoestrus, and the luteal and follicular phases of the oestrous cycle. Secretion is probably also pulsatile during the preovulatory surge of LH. (2) The secretion of LH is affected by the ovarian steroids, oestradiol and progesterone, both of which act principally to reduce the frequency of the pulses. During the luteal phase the two steroids act synergistically to exert this effect, and during anoestrus oestradiol acts independently of progesterone. Androstenedione secreted by the ovary apparently has no role in the control of LH secretion. (3) The amplitude of the pulses may also be affected by the steroids but there are conflicting reports on these effects, some showing that amplitude is lowered by the presence of oestrogen and others showing increases in amplitude in the presence of oestrogen and progesterone. (4) The secretion of LH pulses is affected by photoperiod, social environment and nutrition. Under the influence of decreasing day-length, oestradiol alone cannot reduce the frequency of pulses and the ewe experiences oestrous cycles. When day-length is increasing, the hypothalamus becomes more responsive to oestradiol which reduces the frequency of the pulses. (5) A hypothetical pheromone secreted by rams can increase the frequency of the LH pulses in anoestrous ewes and thereby induce ovulation, possibly by inhibiting the negative feedback exerted by oestradiol. (6) The relationships between nutrition and reproduction are poorly understood, but it seems likely that the effects of nutrition are mediated partly through the hypothalamus and its control of the secretion of LH pulses. (7) The pulses of LH secreted by the anterior pituitary gland are evoked by pulses of GnRH secreted by the hypothalamus. The location of the centre controlling the GnRH pulses and the neurotransmitter involved are not known.     

Changes in gonadotrophin secretion and ovarian antral follicular activity in seasonally breeding sheep throughout the year

Overall, significantly more antral follicles greater than or equal to 1 mm diameter were present in Romney ewes during anoestrus than in the breeding season (anoestrus, 35 +/- 3 (mean +/- s.e.m.) follicles per ewe, 23 sheep; Day 9-10 of oestrous cycle, 24 +/- 1 follicles per ewe, 22 sheep; P less than 0.01), although the mean numbers of preovulatory-sized follicles (greater than or equal to 5 mm diam.) were similar (anoestrus, 1.3 +/- 0.2 per ewe; oestrous cycle, 1.0 +/- 0.1 per ewe). The ability of ovarian follicles to synthesize oestradiol did not differ between anoestrus and the breeding season as assessed from the levels of extant aromatase enzyme activity in granulosa cells and steroid concentrations in follicular fluid. Although the mean plasma concentration of LH did not differ between anoestrus and the luteal phase of the breeding season, the pattern of LH secretion differed markedly; on Day 9-10 of the oestrous cycle there were significantly more (P less than 0.001) high-amplitude LH peaks (i.e. greater than or equal to 1 ng/ml) in plasma and significantly fewer (P less than 0.001) low amplitude peaks (less than 1 ng/ml) than in anoestrous ewes. Moreover, the mean concentrations of FSH and prolactin were significantly lower during the luteal phase of the cycle than during anoestrus (FSH, P less than 0.05, prolactin, P less than 0.001). It is concluded that, in Romney ewes, the levels of antral follicular activity change throughout the year in synchrony with the circannual patterns of prolactin and day-length. Also, these data support the notion that anovulation during seasonal anoestrus is due to a reduced frequency of high-amplitude LH discharges from the pituitary gland.     

Response of prepubertal ewes primed with monensin or progesterone to administration of FSH

Prepubertal ewe lambs were treated with FSH after progesterone priming for 12 days (Group P), monensin supplementation for 14 days (Group M) or a standard diet (Group C). Serial blood samples were taken for LH and progesterone assay, and ovariectomy was performed on half of each group 38-52 h after start of treatment to assess ovarian function, follicular steroid production in vitro and the concentration of gonadotrophin binding sites in follicles. The remaining ewe lambs were ovariectomized 8 days after FSH treatment to determine whether functional corpora lutea were present. FSH treatment was followed by a preovulatory LH surge which occurred significantly later (P less than 0.05) and was better synchronized in ewes in Groups P and M than in those in Group C. At 13-15 h after the LH surge significantly more large follicles were present on ovaries from Group P and M ewes than in Group C. Follicles greater than 5 mm diameter from ewes in Groups P and M produced significantly less oestrogen and testosterone and more dihydrotestosterone, and had significantly more hCG binding sites, than did similar-sized follicles from Group C animals. Ovariectomy on Day 8 after the completion of FSH treatment showed that ewes in Groups P and M had significantly greater numbers of functional corpora lutea. These results indicate that, in prepubertal ewes, progesterone priming and monensin supplementation may delay the preovulatory LH surge, allowing follicles developing after FSH treatment more time to mature before ovulation. This may result in better luteinization of ruptured follicles in these ewes, with the formation of functional corpora lutea.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Peripheral plasma concentrations of oestradiol, progesterone, cortisol, LH and prolactin during the oestrous cycle in the cow, with emphasis on the peri-oestrous period

Interrelationships of circulating hormone levels and their implications for follicular development were studied throughout the oestrous cycle with emphasis on the perioestrous period in heifers and cows. The oestradiol level showed a major peak (45 pmol/1) before and coinciding with oestrus, and a second peak (27 pmol/1) around day 5–6 (day 0: day of first standing oestrus); it was low during the luteal phase of the cycle when progesterone was higher than 14 nmol/1 from day −12 to day −2. Large antral follicles, which had developed during the luteal phase, did not secrete significant amounts of oestradiol, degenerated after luteolysis, and were replaced by a newly developing follicle which became preovulatory. Parallel with this development the oestradiol level increased from the onset of luteolysis to reach a plateau about 26 h before the onset of oestrus. The interval between the onset of luteolysis and the onset of oestrus was 58 h; luteolysis proceeded at a slower rate in heifers than in cows. At 4.6 h after the onset of oestrus the maximum of the LH surge was recorded; the LH surge appeared to be postponed in the period October–December in comparison to the period August–September. The maximum of the LH surge was higher in heifers (45 μg/l) than in cows (30 μg/l), but its duration was similar (8.0 h). The oestradiol level decreased significantly from 6 h after the maximum of the LH surge, and standing oestrus (duration 18 h) was terminated almost at the same time as the return to basal values of oestradiol. Cortisol and prolactin levels did not show a peak during the peri-oestrus period. Cortisol fluctuated irrespective of the stage of the oestrus cycle and prolactin was significantly higher during the luteal phase.

The results of this study indicate that development of the preovulatory follicle starts in the cow at the onset of luteolysis, about 2.5 days before the preovulatory LH surge, and that oestradiol secretion by this follicle is possibly inhibited by the LH surge.     

Seasonal variation in oestrus, the secretion of oestrogen and progesterone and LH levels before ovulation in the ewe

Ewes with cervical ovarian autotransplants were studied after PGF-2alpha-induced luteal regression in November and February (mid- and late-breeding season) and June (anoestrum). Progesteron and oestradiol-17beta secretion rates and LH concentrations were determined in serial ovarian venous blood samples and the ewes were frequently tested for oestrus. All 4 ewes in November and 3 of the 4 ewes in February exhibited oestrus and endocrine changes indicative of ovulation. The remaining ewe in February and the three ewes in June failed to show elevated oestradiol-17beta secretion rates after luteal regression, indicating the absence of follicles in the final stages of maturation. The preovulatory rise in the oestradiol-17beta secretion rate, the LH surge and the display of oestrus all occurred earlier, with respect to the PGF-2alpha infusion, in November than in February, suggesting a greater stimulation of folliculogenesis, and therefore a greater availability of maturing follicles, in November than in February.     

Plasma gonadotropin and progesterone concentrations during the estrous cycle of Finn, Suffolk and Targhee ewes

Hormonal profiles during the estrous cycle of Finn, Suffolk and Targhee ewes were compared in six ewes of each breed. Blood samples were drawn by venipuncture at 8-h intervals from onset to onset of consecutive estrous periods. Number of corpora lutea (CL) and ovarian follicles >/=3 mm in diameter on Day 10 (estrus = Day 0) were observed using endoscopy. Estrous cycle length was 14.9, 15.6 and 16.4 d (P<0.01) in Finn, Suffolk and Targhee ewes, respectively. Finns had more (P<0.001) CL (3.5) than Suffolks (2.0) and Targhees (1.8), but luteal phase progesterone concentrations were similar among breeds in peak level and area under the curve. In Finn ewes, the amplitude of the preovulatory LH surge was lower (P<0.01) and tended to occur later in estrus; otherwise LH levels and patterns were similar among breeds. A coincident follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) preovulatory surge occurred in most ewes, the amplitude of which was related to that of luteinizing hormone (LH); r = 0.67, P<0.01. Plasma FSH levels and patterns were similar in Finn, Suffolk and Targhee ewes and most ewes had three to four secretory episodes. Follicles >/=3 mm averaged 1.8, 1.0 and 1.2 (P>0.1) in Finn, Suffolk and Targhee ewes, respectively. Results indicate that the higher ovulation rate of the Finn ewe is not elicited by increased FSH levels at any stage of the estrous cycle.     

Induction of ovulation in the acyclic postpartum ewe following continuous, low-dose subcutaneous infusion of GnRH

Pituitary and ovarian responses to subcutaneous infusion of GnRH were investigated in acyclic, lactating Mule ewes during the breeding season. Thirty postpartum ewes were split into 3 equal groups; Group G received GnRH (250 ng/h) for 96 h; Group P + G was primed with progestagen for 10 d then received GnRH (250 ng/h) for 96 h; and Group P received progestagen priming and saline vehicle only. The infusions were delivered via osmotic minipumps inserted 26.6 +/- 0.45 d post partum (Day 0 of the study). Blood samples were collected for LH analysis every 15 min from 12 h before until 8 h after minipump insertion, then every 2 h for a further 112 h. Daily blood samples were collected for progesterone analysis on Days 1 to 10 following minipump insertion, then every third day for a further 25 d. In addition, the reproductive tract was examined by laparoscopy on Day -5 and Day +7 and estrous behavior was monitored between Day -4 and Day +7. Progestagen priming suppressed (P < 0.05) plasma LH levels (0.27 +/- 0.03 vs 0.46 +/- 0.06 ng/ml) during the preinfusion period, but the GnRH-induced LH release was similar for Group G and Group P + G. The LH surge began significantly (P < 0.05) earlier (32.0 +/- 3.0 vs 56.3 +/- 4.1 h) and was of greater magnitude (32.15 +/- 3.56 vs 18.84 +/- 4.13 ng/ml) in the unprimed than the primed ewes. None of the ewes infused with saline produced a preovulatory LH surge. The GnRH infusion induced ovulation in 10/10 unprimed and 7/9 progestagen-primed ewes, with no significant difference in ovulation rate (1.78 +/- 0.15 and 1.33 +/- 0.21, respectively). Ovulation was followed by normal luteal function in 4/10 Group-G ewes, while the remaining 6 ewes had short luteal phases. In contrast, each of the 7 Group-P + G ewes that ovulated secreted progesterone for at least 10 d, although elevated plasma progesterone levels were maintained in 3/7 unmated ewes for >35 d. Throughout the study only 2 ewes (both from Group P + G) displayed estrus. These data demonstrate that although a low dose, continuous infusion of GnRH can increase tonic LH concentrations sufficient to promote a preovulatory LH surge and induce ovulation, behavioral estrus and normal luteal function do not consistently follow ovulation in the progestagen-primed, postpartum ewe.     

Endocrine alterations that underlie endotoxin-induced disruption of the follicular phase in ewes

Two experiments were conducted to investigate endocrine mechanisms by which the immune/inflammatory stimulus endotoxin disrupts the follicular phase of the estrous cycle of the ewe. In both studies, endotoxin was infused i.v. (300 ng/kg per hour) for 26 h beginning 12 h after withdrawal of progesterone to initiate the follicular phase. Experiment 1 sought to pinpoint which endocrine step or steps in the preovulatory sequence are compromised by endotoxin. In sham-infused controls, estradiol rose progressively from the time of progesterone withdrawal until the LH/FSH surges and estrous behavior, which began approximately 48 h after progesterone withdrawal. Endotoxin interrupted the preovulatory estradiol rise and delayed or blocked the LH/FSH surges and estrus. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that endotoxin suppresses the high-frequency LH pulses necessary to stimulate the preovulatory estradiol rise. All 6 controls exhibited high-frequency LH pulses typically associated with the preovulatory estradiol rise. As in the first experiment, endotoxin interrupted the estradiol rise and delayed or blocked the LH/FSH surges and estrus. LH pulse patterns, however, differed among the six endotoxin-treated ewes. Three showed markedly disrupted LH pulses compared to those of controls. The three remaining experimental ewes expressed LH pulses similar to those of controls; yet the estradiol rise and preovulatory LH surge were still disrupted. Our results demonstrate that endotoxin invariably interrupts the preovulatory estradiol rise and delays or blocks the subsequent LH and FSH surges in the ewe. Mechanistically, endotoxin can interfere with the preovulatory sequence of endocrine events via suppression of LH pulsatility, although other processes such as ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropin stimulation appear to be disrupted as well.     

Ovarian function in ewes during the transition from breeding season to anoestrus

Transrectal ovarian ultrasonography was conducted in six Western white-faced ewes for 35 days from the last oestrus of the breeding season, to record the number and size of all ovarian follicles > or = 3 mm in diameter and luteal structures. Blood samples were collected once a day for estimation of serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), oestradiol and progesterone. Each ewe had five follicular waves (follicles growing from 3 to > or = 5 mm in diameter) over the scanning period. The duration of the growth phase of the largest ovarian follicles did not differ (P > 0.05) between waves, but follicular static and regressing phases decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after the decline in serum progesterone concentrations at the end of the last luteal phase of the breeding season. The intervals between the five follicular waves were: 9.2+/-0.4, 5.2+/-0.7, 8.3+/-0.8 and 5.8+/-0.7 days; the two shorter intervals differed (P < 0.05) from the two longer intervals. Using the cycle-detection program, rhythmic increases in serum FSH concentrations were detected in all ewes; the amplitude, duration and periodicity of FSH fluctuations did not vary (P > 0.05) throughout the period of study. The number of identified FSH peaks (7.8+/-0.5 peaks per ewe, per scanning period) was greater (P < 0.05) than the number of emerging follicular waves. Serum concentrations of oestradiol remained low (< or = 1 pg/ml) on most days, in five out of the six ewes studied, and sporadic elevations in oestradiol secretion above the non-detectable level were not associated with the emergence of follicular waves. The ovulation rate was lower than that seen during the middle portion of the breeding season (November-December) in white-faced ewes but the transitional ewes had larger corpora lutea (CL). Maximal serum concentrations of progesterone appeared to be lower and the plateau phase of progesterone secretion appeared to be shorter during the last luteal phase of the ovulatory season in comparison to the mid-breeding season of Western white-faced ewes. During the transition into anoestrus in ewes, the endogenous rhythm of FSH release is remarkably robust but the pattern of emergence of sequential follicular waves is dissociated from FSH and oestradiol secretion. Luteal progesterone secretion is suppressed because of fewer ovulations and diminished total luteal volume, but it may also result from diminished gonadotropic support. These season-related alterations in the normal pattern of ovine ovarian cycles appear to be due to reduction in ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropins and/or attenuation in secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) occurring at the onset of the anovulatory season in ewes.     

Temporal relationships between peripheral plasma concentrations of oxytocin, progesterone and 13, 14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F2α during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy in the ewe

Peripheral plasma concentrations of oxytocin, 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F_2α(PGFM), progesterone and LH were determined at 3 hourly intervals during the oesterous cycle (n = 3) and in early pregnancy (n = 4) in sheep. The progesterone and LH concentrations showed that the cycling ewes were samples during the periods of luteal regression (decreasing progesterone concentrations), the preovulatory gonadotrophin surge and the beginning of the next luteal phase (increasing progesterone concentrations). The pregnant ewes had basal LH concentrations and luteal phase concentrations of progesterone (>lng/ml afte day 5 following mating) throughout the whole of the sampling period. Oxytocin concentrations in the non-pregnant ewes decreased around the time of luteal regression to reach low concentrations (mean concentrations of approximately 18pg/ml) during the preovulatory period and then increased after the preovulatory surge. PGFM concentrations exhibited a pulsatile pattern with increasing concentrations as progesterone levels fell. In the pregnant ewes oxytocin concentrations gradually fell until approximately 16 days post-mating (approximately 7–8pg/ml). The magnitude of the pulses in PGFM concentrations were also lower than in the cycling ewes. These results demonstrate that the increased concentrations of PGFM which are found during the period of luteal regression are not caused by increased peripheral concentrations of oxytocin.     

Increase in ovulation rate after treatment of ewes with bovine follicular fluid in the luteal phase of the oestrous cycle

Administration of charcoal-treated bovine follicular fluid to Damline ewes twice daily (i.v.) from Days 1 to 11 of the luteal phase (Day 0 = oestrus) resulted in a delay in the onset of oestrous behaviour and a significant increase in ovulation rate following cloprostenol-induced luteolysis on Day 12. During follicular fluid treatment plasma levels of FSH in samples withdrawn just before injection of follicular fluid at 09:00 h (i.e. 16 h after previous injection of follicular fluid) were initially suppressed, but by Day 8 of treatment had returned to those of controls. However, the injection of follicular fluid at 09:00 h on Day 8 still caused a significant suppression of FSH as measured during a 6-h sampling period. Basal LH levels were higher throughout treatment due to a significant increase in amplitude and frequency of pulsatile secretion. After cloprostenol-induced luteal regression at the end of treatment on Day 12, plasma levels of FSH increased 4-fold over those of controls and remained higher until the preovulatory LH surge. While LH concentrations were initially higher relative to those of controls, there was no significant difference in the amount of LH released immediately before or during the preovulatory surge. These results suggest that the increase in ovulation rate observed during treatment with bovine follicular fluid is associated with the change in the pattern of gonadotrophin secretion in the luteal and follicular phases of the cycle.     

Resumption of gonadotrophin release during the post-partum period in suckling and non-suckling ewes

The post-partum secretion of LH, FSH and prolactin was monitored in 15 suckling and 6 non-suckling Préalpes du Sud ewes lambing during the breeding season by measuring plasma hormone concentrations daily at 6-h intervals and also weekly at 20-min intervals for 6 h from parturition to resumption of regular cyclic ovarian activity. There was a constant phenomenon in the resumption of normal patterns of FSH and LH secretion: there was a rise in FSH values culminating on average on Day 4 post partum and returning subsequently to values observed during the oestrous cycle, and concurrently an increase in the frequency and amplitude of LH pulses more progressive in suckling than in non-suckling ewes which led to an elevation of LH mean concentrations and occurrence of an LH surge. Since neither the FSH secretory pattern nor FSH mean values differed between suckling and non-suckling ewes, the results suggested that LH pulsatile pattern was a major limiting factor for the resumption of normal oestrous cycles. Before regular oestrous cycles resumed other changes in preovulatory LH surges also occurred: (i) they increased in duration and probably in amplitude; (ii) they were preceded by an acceleration in LH pulse frequency and a large decrease in FSH values as in normal cyclic ewes; and (iii) at least in non-suckling ewes they occurred concurrently with a prolactin surge.     

The effects of GnRH analogue (buserelin) or hCG (Chorulon) on Day 12 of pregnancy on ovarian function, plasma hormone concentrations, conceptus growth and placentation in ewes and ewe lambs

The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of GnRH analogue (buserelin) or human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG, Chorulon) treatment on Day 12 of pregnancy on ovarian function, plasma hormone concentrations, conceptus growth and placentation in ewes and ewe lambs. After oestrus synchronization with progestagen sponges and eCG, all the animals were mated with fertile rams. Both ewes and ewe lambs (20 per treatment group) were given either normal saline or 4 microg GnRH or 200 IU hCG on Day 12 post-mating. Pre- and post-treatment plasma hormone concentrations were determined in seven pregnant animals per treatment group in samples collected 1h before and 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 h after treatment. Overall mean progesterone concentrations were higher (P<0.001) in ewes as compared with ewe lambs in saline-treated controls. GnRH or hCG treatment increased (P<0.001) mean plasma progesterone concentrations in both age groups, however, post-treatment concentrations were significantly (P<0.05) higher in ewes than in ewe lambs. Oestradiol concentrations were similar in the two control groups. In ewes, but not in ewe lambs, both GnRH and hCG treatments significantly (P<0.05) increased the mean oestradiol concentrations above pre-treatment levels. Moreover, post-treatment oestradiol concentrations in GnRH- and hCG-treated animals were significantly (P<0.05) higher than those in the saline-treated controls. LH release in response to GnRH treatment was greater (P<0.05) in ewes than in ewe lambs, whereas FSH release in ewes was less (P<0.05) than that of ewe lambs. The effects of GnRH or hCG on conceptus growth and placentation was determined at slaughter on Day 25. In ewes, GnRH treatment increased (P<0.05) luteal weight, amniotic sac width and length, and crown-rump length compared with controls, but had no effect on these parameters in ewe lambs. In ewes, hCG treatment also enhanced (P<0.05) luteal weight, amniotic sac width and length, crown-rump length, embryo weight and number of placentomes as compared with controls. In ewe lambs, there was no difference (P<0.05) between hCG and control groups in luteal weight, embryo weight and amniotic sac width but crown-rump length, amniotic sac length and the number of placentomes forming the placenta were greater (P<0.05). In conclusion, GnRH or hCG treatment on Day 12 of pregnancy can increase ovarian function, conceptus growth and placental attachment in ewes. However, these treatments were less effective in ewe lambs.     

Gonadotrophin secretion during the periovulatory period in Galway and Finnish Landrace ewes and Finnish Landrace ewes selected for high ovulation rate

Rates of ovulation differed significantly (P less than 0.01) among ewes of the different genetic lines. However, of the reproductive characteristics studied, only progesterone concentration at the height of luteal function, duration of oestrus, and interval from onset of oestrus to peak of the preovulatory gonadotrophin surge showed significant positive association with rate of ovulation. The pattern of secretion of LH during the periovulatory period did not differ in the Galway and Finnish Landrace breeds. The total amount of LH secreted during the preovulatory surge did not differ amongst lines. Similarly, no difference in the plasma concentration of LH at the height of the preovulatory surge was noted among Galway and reference Finnish Landrace lines. However, the concentration of LH at the height of the surge was significantly (P less than 0.05) reduced in the selected Finnish Landrace line. Plasma concentrations of FSH during the preovulatory period were significantly (P less than 0.05) elevated in the breed (Galway) with the lowest prolifcacy. When contrasted with either of the Finnish Landrace lines, the magnitudes of the preovulatory surge of FSH and the secondary surge of FSH were significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in Galway ewes. These results suggest that genetic difference in rate of ovulation among sheep breeds is not tightly coupled to quantitative differences in plasma concentration of gonadotrophic hormones during the periovulatory period.