Coordination of endoplasmic reticulum and mRNA localization to the yeast bud

Localization of messenger RNAs and local protein synthesis contribute to asymmetric protein distribution not only of cytoplasmic but also of membrane or secreted proteins. Since synthesis of the latter protein classes occurs at the rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mRNA localization and distribution of ER should be coordinated. However, this coordination is not yet understood. In yeast, mRNA localization to the growing bud depends on the myosin Myo4p, its adaptor She3p, and the specific RNA binding protein She2p. These proteins mediate the localization of 23 mRNAs including ASH1 mRNA and mRNAs encoding membrane proteins. In addition, Myo4p and She3p are required for segregation of cortical ER to the bud. Here we show, with ASH1 mRNA as a model mRNA, that localizing messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) particles comigrate with tubular ER structures to the bud, which requires the RNA binding protein She2p. Coordinated movement of the ASH1 mRNP with ER tubules but not their association with each other depends on Myo4p and She3p. Subcellular fractionation experiments demonstrate a cosegregation of ER and She2p, which is independent of Myo4p, She3p, or polysomes. Our findings suggest a novel model for mRNA localization that involves association of She2p and mRNPs with ER tubules and myosin-dependent cotransport of tubules and localized mRNPs.     

The function of proteins that interact with mRNA

Specific proteins are associated with mRNA in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells. The complement of associated proteins depends upon whether the mRNA is an integral component of the polysomal complex being translated, or, alternatively, whether it is part of the non-translated free mRNP fraction. By subjecting cells to ultraviolet irradiation in vivo to cross-link proteins to mRNA, mRNP proteins have been shown to be associated with specific regions of the mRNA molecule. Examination of mRNP complexes containing a unique mRNA has suggested that not all mRNA contain the same family of associated RNA binding proteins. The function of mRNA associated proteins may include a role in providing stability for mRNA, and/or in modulating translation. With the recent demonstrations that both free and polysomal mRNPs are associated with the cytoskeletal framework, specific mRNP proteins may play a role in determining the subcellular localization of specific mRNPs.     

Atomic force microscopy reveals binding of mRNA to microtubules mediated by two major mRNP proteins YB-1 and PABP

A significant fraction of mRNAs is known to be associated in the form of mRNPs with microtubules for active transport. However, little is known about the interaction between mRNPs and microtubules and most of previous works were focused on molecular motor:microtubule interactions. Here, we have identified, via high resolution atomic force microscopy imaging, a significant binding of mRNA to microtubules mediated by two major mRNP proteins, YB-1 and PABP. This interaction with microtubules could be of critical importance for active mRNP traffic and for mRNP granule formation. A similar role may be fulfilled by other cationic mRNA partners.     

Protein composition of human mRNPs spliced in vitro and differential requirements for mRNP protein recruitment

The deposition of proteins onto newly spliced mRNAs has far reaching consequences for their subsequent metabolism. We affinity-purified spliced human mRNPs under physiological conditions from HeLa nuclear extract and present the first comprehensive inventory of their protein composition as determined by mass spectrometry. Several proteins previously not known to be mRNP-associated were detected, including the DEAD-box helicases DDX3, DDX5, and DDX9, and the ELG, hNHN1, BCLAF1, and TRAP150 proteins. The association of some of the newly identified mRNP proteins was shown to be splicing-dependent, but not to require EJC formation. Initial recruitment of EJC proteins to the spliceosome did not require an EJC binding platform at the -20/24 region of the 5' exon. Finally, while recruitment of EJC proteins and stable EJC formation were not dependent on the cap binding complex, several of the newly identified mRNP proteins required the latter for their association with mRNPs. These results provide novel insights into the composition of spliced mRNPs and the requirements for the association of mRNP proteins with the newly spliced mRNA.     

Cytoskeletal association of muscle-specific mRNAs in differentiating L6 rat myoblasts

The importance of the cytoskeleton in protein synthesis was studied in differentiating L6 rat myoblasts. Soluble and cytoskeletal fractions obtained after gentle, non-ionic detergent lysis of myoblasts and myotubes were analysed for the presence of ribosomes and mRNPs. Polysomal mRNPs were predominantly associated with the cytoskeletal framework and free mRNPs were present in both soluble and cytoskeletal fractions. An examination of the distribution of specific mRNAs in the polysomal and free mRNP populations of both cytoplasmic fractions revealed differences in the pattern of their distribution. It is further demonstrated that in the L6 rat myoblast system, ribosomes and mRNA (or mRNP) are not associated with the microfilaments, unlike in other systems studied.     

The UCS domain protein She4p binds to myosin motor domains and is essential for class I and class V myosin function

BACKGROUND: Myosins are motor proteins involved in processes like cell motility, vesicle transport, or cytokinesis. In a variety of organisms, a novel group of proteins forming the UCS (UNC-45/CRO1/SHE4) domain-containing family are essential for proper myosin function. The Saccharomyces cerevisae UCS domain protein She4p is involved in two myosin-requiring events, endocytosis and mRNA localization. RESULTS: In contrast to UCS domain proteins from other organisms that interact with class II myosins, we demonstrate that She4p associates with yeast class I and class V myosins. She4p binds to motor domains of class V myosin Myo4p and class I myosin Myo5p, and this binding depends on She4p's UCS domain. In vivo, She4p is essential for the function and localization of Myo3p, Myo4p, and Myo5p (but not of Myo2p) and for colocalization of class I myosins with cortical actin patches. In vitro, She4p stimulates binding of Myo5p to filamentous actin. Wild-type She4p, but not a mutant lacking the UCS domain, accumulates in a cap-like structure at the bud tip. This localization requires Myo2p and actin, suggesting a Myo2-dependent mechanism by which She4p is targeted to the bud cap. Localization of She4p is essential for proper positioning and myosin-actin association of cortical Myo5p. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that She4p is a novel myosin motor domain binding protein and operates as a localized regulator of myosin function of class I and likely class V myosins.     

Visualization of the reconstituted FRGY2-mRNA complexes by electron microscopy

Xenopus oocytes store large quantities of translationally dormant mRNA in the cytoplasm as storage messenger ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs). The Y-box proteins, mRNP3 and FRGY2/mRNP4, are major RNA binding components of maternal storage mRNPs in oocytes. In this study, we show that the FRGY2 proteins form complexes with mRNA, which leads to mRNA stabilization and translational repression. Visualization of the FRGY2-mRNA complexes by electron microscopy reveals that FRGY2 packages mRNA into a compact RNP. Our results are consistent with a model that the Y-box proteins function in packaging of mRNAs to store them stably for a long time in the oocyte cytoplasm.     

Information relay from gene to protein: the mRNP connection

Eukaryotic messenger RNAs and their binding proteins are organized into structural units called ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs). Some mRNP proteins are ubiquitous, and might bind all mRNAs to ensure efficient translation. Other mRNA proteins, however, are cell-specific and bind only certain mRNAs that display regulated translation. This is particularly evident in early development, where some mRNP particles can be sequestered from the translational apparatus for months before they enter polysomes. Recent investigations suggest that these and other mRNP proteins bind specific sequences and regulate translation.     

Analysis of the control of citrulline synthesis in isolated rat-liver mitochondria

Irradiation of chicken muscle cells with ultraviolet light (254 nm) to cross-link RNA and protein moieties was used to examine the polypeptide complements of cytoplasmic mRNA-protein complexes (mRNP). The polypeptides of translationally active mRNP complexes released from polysomes were compared to the repressed nonpolysomal cytoplasmic (free) mRNP complexes. In general, all of the polypeptides present in free mRNPs were also found in the polysomal mRNPs. In contrast to polysomal mRNPS, polypeptides of Mr 28 000, 32 000, 46 000, 65 000 and 150 000 were either absent or present in relatively smaller quantities in free mRNP complexes. On the other hand, the relative proportion of polypeptides of Mr 130 000 and 43 000 was higher in free mRNPs than in polysomal mRNP complexes. To examine the role of cytoplasmic mRNP complexes in protein synthesis or mRNA metabolism, the changes in these complexes were studied following (a) inhibition of mRNA synthesis and (b) heat-shock treatment to alter the pattern of protein synthesis. Actinomycin D was used to inhibit mRNA synthesis in chick myotubes. The possibility of newly synthesized polypeptides of cytoplasmic mRNP complexes being assembled into these complexes in the absence of mRNA synthesis was examined. These studies showed that the polypeptides of both free and polysomal mRNP complexes can bind to pre-existing mRNAs, therefore suggesting that polypeptides of mRNP complexes can be exchanged with a pool of RNA-binding proteins. In free mRNP complexes, this exchange of polypeptides is significantly slower than in the polysomal mRNP complexes. Heat-shock treatment of chicken myotubes induces the synthesis of three polypeptides of Mr = 81 000, 65 000 and 25 000 (heat-shock polypeptides). Whether this altered pattern of protein synthesis following heat-shock treatment could affect the polypeptide composition of translationally active polysomal mRNPs was examined. The results of these studies show that, compared to normal cells, more newly synthesized polypeptides were assembled into polysomal mRNPs following heat-shock treatment. A [35S]methionine-labeled polypeptide of Mr = 80 000 was detected in mRNPs of heat-shocked cells, but not of normal cells. This polypeptide was, however, detected by AgNO3 staining of the unlabeled polypeptide of mRNP complexes of normal cells. These results, therefore, suggest that the assembly of newly synthesized 80 000-Mr polypeptide to polysomal mRNPs was enhanced following induction of new heat-shock mRNAs. The results of these studies reported here have been discussed in relation to the concept that free mRNP complexes are inefficiently translated in vivo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

The Src Homology Domain 3 (SH3) of a Yeast Type I Myosin, Myo5p, Binds to Verprolin and Is Required for Targeting to Sites of Actin Polarization

The budding yeast contains two type I myosins, Myo3p and Myo5p, with redundant functions. Deletion of both myosins results in growth defects, loss of actin polarity and polarized cell surface growth, and accumulation of intracellular membranes. Expression of myc-tagged Myo5p in myo3Δ myo5Δ cells fully restores wild-type characteristics. Myo5p is localized as punctate, cortical structures enriched at sites of polarized cell growth. We find that latrunculin-A–induced depolymerization of F-actin results in loss of Myo5p patches. Moreover, incubation of yeast cells at 37°C results in transient depolarization of both Myo5p patches and the actin cytoskeleton. Mutant Myo5 proteins with deletions in nonmotor domains were expressed in myo3Δ myo5Δ cells and the resulting strains were analyzed for Myo5p function. Deletion of the tail homology 2 (TH2) domain, previously implicated in ATP-insensitive actin binding, has no detectable effect on Myo5p function. In contrast, myo3Δ myo5Δ cells expressing mutant Myo5 proteins with deletions of the src homology domain 3 (SH3) or both TH2 and SH3 domains display defects including Myo5p patch depolarization, actin disorganization, and phenotypes associated with actin dysfunction. These findings support a role for the SH3 domain in Myo5p localization and function in budding yeast. The proline-rich protein verprolin (Vrp1p) binds to the SH3 domain of Myo3p or Myo5p in two-hybrid tests, coimmunoprecipitates with Myo5p, and colocalizes with Myo5p. Immunolocalization of the myc-tagged SH3 domain of Myo5p reveals diffuse cytoplasmic staining. Thus, the SH3 domain of Myo5p contributes to but is not sufficient for localization of Myo5p either to patches or to sites of polarized cell growth. Consistent with this, Myo5p patches assemble but do not localize to sites of polarized cell surface growth in a VRP1 deletion mutant. Our studies support a multistep model for Myo5p targeting in yeast. The first step, assembly of Myo5p patches, is dependent upon F-actin, and the second step, polarization of actin patches, requiresVrp1p and the SH3 domain of Myo5p.     

Statistical modeling of mRNP transport in dendrites: A comparative analysis of β-actin and Arc mRNP dynamics

Localization of messenger RNA (mRNA) in dendrites is crucial for regulating gene expression during long-term memory formation. mRNA binds to RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) to form messenger ribonucleoprotein (mRNP) complexes that are transported by motor proteins along microtubules to their target synapses. However, the dynamics by which mRNPs find their target locations in the dendrite have not been well understood. Here, we investigated the motion of endogenous β-actin and Arc mRNPs in dissociated mouse hippocampal neurons using the MS2 and PP7 stem-loop systems, respectively. By evaluating the statistical properties of mRNP movement, we found that the aging Lévy walk model effectively describes both β-actin and Arc mRNP transport in proximal dendrites. A critical difference between β-actin and Arc mRNPs was the aging time, the time lag between transport initiation and measurement initiation. The longer mean aging time of β-actin mRNP (~100 s) compared with that of Arc mRNP (~30 s) reflects the longer half-life of constitutively expressed β-actin mRNP. Furthermore, our model also permitted us to estimate the ratio of newly generated and pre-existing β-actin mRNPs in the dendrites. This study offers a robust theoretical framework for mRNP transport, which provides insight into how mRNPs locate their targets in neurons.     

Stress granules are dispensable for mRNA stabilization during cellular stress

During cellular stress, protein synthesis is severely reduced and bulk mRNA is recruited to stress granules (SGs). Previously, we showed that the SG-recruited IGF2 mRNA-binding protein 1 (IGF2BP1) interferes with target mRNA degradation during cellular stress. Whether this requires the formation of SGs remained elusive. Here, we demonstrate that the sustained inhibition of visible SGs requires the concomitant knockdown of TIA1, TIAR and G3BP1. FRAP and photo-conversion studies, however, indicate that these proteins only transiently associate with SGs. This suggests that instead of forming a rigid scaffold for mRNP recruitment, TIA proteins and G3BP1 promote SG-formation by constantly replenishing mRNPs. In contrast, RNA-binding proteins like IGF2BP1 or HUR, which are dispensable for SG-assembly, are stably associated with SGs and the IGF2BP1/HUR-G3BP1 association is increased during stress. The depletion of IGF2BP1 enhances the degradation of target mRNAs irrespective of inhibiting SG-formation, whereas the turnover of bulk mRNA remains unaffected when SG-formation is impaired. Together these findings indicate that the stabilization of mRNAs during cellular stress is facilitated by the formation of stable mRNPs, which are recruited to SGs by TIA proteins and/or G3BP1. Importantly, however, the aggregation of mRNPs to visible SGs is dispensable for preventing mRNA degradation.