Sequence determinants of the capping box, a stabilizing motif at the N-termini of alpha-helices.

The capping box, a recurrent hydrogen bonded motif at the N-termini of alpha-helices, caps 2 of the initial 4 backbone amide hydrogen donors of the helix (Harper ET, Rose GD, 1993, Biochemistry 32:7605-7609). In detail, the side chain of the first helical residue forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone of the fourth helical residue and, reciprocally, the side chain of the fourth residue forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone of the first residue. We now enlarge the earlier definition of this motif to include an accompanying hydrophobic interaction between residues that bracket the capping box sequence on either side. The expanded box motif--in which 2 hydrogen bonds and a hydrophobic interaction are localized within 6 consecutive residues--resembles a glycine-based capping motif found at helix C-termini (Aurora R, Srinivasan R, Rose GD, 1994, Science 264:1126-1130).     

Phosphorylation stabilizes the N‐termini of α‐helices

The role of phosphorylation in stabilizing the N‐termini of α‐helices is examined using computer simulations of model peptides. The models comprise either a phosphorylated or unphosphorylated serine at the helix N‐terminus, followed by nine alanines. Monte Carlo/stochastic Dynamics simulations were performed on the model helices. The simulations revealed a distinct stabilization of the helical conformation at the N‐terminus after phosphorylation. The stabilization was attributable to favorable electrostatic interactions between the phosphate and the helix backbone. However, direct helix capping by the phosphorylated sidechain was not observed. The results of the calculations are consistent with experimental evidence on the stabilization of helices by phosphates and other anions. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 49: 225–233, 1999     

Helix capping.

Helix-capping motifs are specific patterns of hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions found at or near the ends of helices in both proteins and peptides. In an alpha-helix, the first four >N-H groups and last four >C=O groups necessarily lack intrahelical hydrogen bonds. Instead, such groups are often capped by alternative hydrogen bond partners. This review enlarges our earlier hypothesis (Presta LG, Rose GD. 1988. Helix signals in proteins. Science 240:1632-1641) to include hydrophobic capping. A hydrophobic interaction that straddles the helix terminus is always associated with hydrogen-bonded capping. From a global survey among proteins of known structure, seven distinct capping motifs are identified-three at the helix N-terminus and four at the C-terminus. The consensus sequence patterns of these seven motifs, together with results from simple molecular modeling, are used to formulate useful rules of thumb for helix termination. Finally, we examine the role of helix capping as a bridge linking the conformation of secondary structure to supersecondary structure.     

Thermodynamic model of secondary structure for α-helical peptides and proteins

A thermodynamic model describing formation of α-helices by peptides and proteins in the absence of specific tertiary interactions has been developed. The model combines free energy terms defining α-helix stability in aqueous solution and terms describing immersion of every helix or fragment of coil into a micelle or a nonpolar droplet created by the rest of protein to calculate averaged or lowest energy partitioning of the peptide chain into helical and coil fragments. The α-helix energy in water was calculated with parameters derived from peptide substitution and protein engineering data and using estimates of nonpolar contact areas between side chains. The energy of nonspecific hydrophobic interactions was estimated considering each α-helix or fragment of coil as freely floating in the spherical micelle or droplet, and using water/cyclohexane (for micelles) or adjustable (for proteins) side-chain transfer energies. The model was verified for 96 and 36 peptides studied by ¹H-nmr spectroscopy in aqueous solution and in the presence of micelles, respectively ([set I] and [set 2]) and for 30 mostly α-helical globular proteins ([set 3]). For peptides, the experimental helix locations were identified from the published medium-range nuclear Overhauser effects detected by ¹H-nmr spectroscopy. For sets 1, 2, and 3, respectively, 93, 100, and 97% of helices were identified with average errors in calculation of helix boundaries of 1.3, 2.0, and 4.1 residues per helix and an average percentage of correctly calculated helix—coil states of 93, 89, and 81%, respectively. Analysis of adjustable parameters of the model (the entropy and enthalpy of the helix—coil transition, the transfer energy of the helix backbone, and parameters of the bound coil), determined by minimization of the average helix boundary deviation for each set of peptides or proteins, demonstrates that, unlike micelles, the interior of the effective protein droplet has solubility characteristics different from that for cyclohexane, does not bind fragments of coil, and lacks interfacial area. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 42: 239–269, 1997     

Side chain-backbone hydrogen bonding contributes to helix stability in peptides derived from an alpha-helical region of carboxypeptidase A

Recently, Presta and Rose proposed that a necessary condition for helix formation is the presence of residues at the N- and C-termini (called NTBs and CTBs) whose side chains can form hydrogen bonds with the initial four amides and the last four carbonyls of the helix, which otherwise lack intrahelical hydrogen bonding partners. We have tested this hypothesis by conformational analysis by circular dichroism (CD) of a synthetic peptide corresponding to a region (171-188) of the protein carboxypeptidase A; in the protein, residues 174 to 186 are helical and are flanked by NTBs and CTBs. Since helix formation in this peptide may also be stabilized by electrostatic interactions, we have compared the helical content of the native peptide with that of several modified peptides designed to enable dissection of different contributions to helix stability. As expected, helix dipole interactions appear to contribute substantially, but we conclude that hydrogen bonding interactions as proposed by Presta and Rose also stabilize helix formation. To assist in comparison of different peptides, we have introduced two concentration-independent CD parameters which are sensitive probes of helix formation.     

Noncharged amino acid residues at the solvent-exposed positions in the middle and at the C terminus of the alpha-helix have the same helical propensity

It was established previously that helical propensities of different amino acid residues in the middle of α‐helix in peptides and in proteins are very similar. The statistical analysis of the protein helices from the known three‐dimensional structures shows no difference in the frequency of noncharged residues in the middle and at the C terminus. Yet, experimental studies show distinctive differences for the helical propensities of noncharged residues in the middle and in the C terminus in model peptides. Is this a general effect, and is it applicable to protein helices or is it specific to the model alanine‐based peptides? To answer this question, the effects of substitutions at positions 28 (middle residue) and 32 (C2 position at the C terminus) of the α‐helix of ubiquitin on the stability of this protein are measured by using differential scanning calorimetry. The two data sets produce similar values for intrinsic helix propensity, leading to a conclusion that noncharged amino acid residues at the solvent‐exposed positions in the middle and at the C terminus of the α‐helix have the same helical propensity. This conclusion is further supported with an excellent correlation between the helix propensity scale obtained for the two positions in ubiquitin with the experimental helix propensity scale established previously and with the statistical distribution of the residues in protein helices.     

Design of stable α‐helices using global sequence optimization

The rational design of peptide and protein helices is not only of practical importance for protein engineering but also is a useful approach in attempts to improve our understanding of protein folding. Recent modifications of theoretical models of helix‐coil transitions allow accurate predictions of the helix stability of monomeric peptides in water and provide new possibilities for protein design. We report here a new method for the design of α‐helices in peptides and proteins using AGADIR, the statistical mechanical theory for helix‐coil transitions in monomeric peptides and the tunneling algorithm of global optimization of multidimensional functions for optimization of amino acid sequences. CD measurements of helical content of peptides with optimized sequences indicate that the helical potential of protein amino acids is high enough to allow formation of stable α‐helices in peptides as short as of 10 residues in length. The results show the maximum achievable helix content (HC) of short peptides with fully optimized sequences at 5 °C is expected to be ～70–75%. Under certain conditions the method can be a powerful practical tool for protein engineering. Unlike traditional approaches that are often used to increase protein stability by adding a few favorable interactions to the protein structure, this method deals with all possible sequences of protein helices and selects the best one from them. Copyright © 2009 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Structures of N-termini of helices in proteins.

We have surveyed 393 N-termini of alpha-helices and 156 N-termini of 3(10)-helices in 85 high resolution, non-homologous protein crystal structures for N-cap side-chain rotamer preferences, hydrogen bonding patterns, and solvent accessibilities. We find very strong rotamer preferences that are unique to N-cap sites. The following rules are generally observed for N-capping in alpha-helices: Thr and Ser N-cap side chains adopt the gauche - rotamer, hydrogen bond to the N3 NH and have psi restricted to 164 +/- 8 degrees. Asp and Asn N-cap side chains either adopt the gauche - rotamer and hydrogen bond to the N3 NH with psi = 172 +/- 10 degrees, or adopt the trans rotamer and hydrogen bond to both the N2 and N3 NH groups with psi = 1-7 +/- 19 degrees. With all other N-caps, the side chain is found in the gauche + rotamer so that the side chain does not interact unfavorably with the N-terminus by blocking solvation and psi is unrestricted. An i, i + 3 hydrogen bond from N3 NH to the N-cap backbone C = O in more likely to form at the N-terminus when an unfavorable N-cap is present. In the 3(10)-helix Asn and Asp remain favorable N-caps as they can hydrogen bond to the N2 NH while in the trans rotamer; in contrast, Ser and Thr are disfavored as their preferred hydrogen bonding partner (N3 NH) is inaccessible. This suggests that Ser is the optimum choice of N-cap when alpha-helix formation is to be encouraged while 3(10)-helix formation discouraged. The strong energetic and structural preferences found for N-caps, which differ greatly from positions within helix interiors, suggest that N-caps should be treated explicitly in any consideration of helical structure in peptides or proteins.     

Effects of alanine substitutions in alpha-helices of sperm whale myoglobin on protein stability.

The peptide backbones in folded native proteins contain distinctive secondary structures, alpha-helices, beta-sheets, and turns, with significant frequency. One question that arises in folding is how the stability of this secondary structure relates to that of the protein as a whole. To address this question, we substituted the alpha-helix-stabilizing alanine side chain at 16 selected sites in the sequence of sperm whale myoglobin, 12 at helical sites on the surface of the protein, and 4 at obviously internal sites. Substitution of alanine for bulky side chains at internal sites destabilizes the protein, as expected if packing interactions are disrupted. Alanine substitutions do not uniformly stabilize the protein, either in capping positions near the ends of helices or at mid-helical sites near the surface of myoglobin. When corrected for the extent of exposure of each side chain replaced by alanine at a mid-helix position, alanine replacement still has no clear effect in stabilizing the native structure. Thus linkage between the stabilization of secondary structure and tertiary structure in myoglobin cannot be demonstrated, probably because of the relatively small free energy differences between side chains in stabilizing isolated helix. By contrast, about 80% of the variance in free energy observed can be accounted for by the loss in buried surface area of the native residue substituted by alanine. The differential free energy of helix stabilization does not account for any additional variation.     

Deciphering the structural code for proteins: helical propensities in domain classes and statistical multiresidue information in alpha-helices.

We made several statistical analyses in a large sample of nearly 4,000 helices (from 546 redundancy-controlled PDB protein subunits), which give new insights into the helical properties of globular proteins. In a first experiment, the amino acid composition of the whole sample was compared with the composition of two helical sample subgroups (the "mainly-alpha" and the "(alpha/beta)8 barrel" domain classes); we reached the conclusion that composition-based helical propensities for secondary structure prediction do not depend on the structural class. Running a five-residue window through the whole sample, the positional composition revealed that positive and negative residues are located throughout the helices and tend to neutralize the macrodipole effect. On this basis, we analyzed charged triplets using a running five-residue window. The conclusion was that only mixed charged residues [positive (+) and negative (-)] located at positions 1-2-5 and 1-4-5 are clearly favored. In these locations the most abundant are (- -..+) and (-..+ +), and this shows the existence of side chain microdipoles, which neutralize the large macrodipole of the helix. We made a systematic statistical analysis of charged, dipolar, and hydrophobic + aromatic residues, which enabled us to work out rules that should be useful for modeling and design purposes. Finally, we analyzed the relative abundance of all the different amphipathic double-arcs that are present in helices formed by octapeptides (8) and nonapeptides (18). All of the double-arcs that make up Schiffer and Edmundson''s classical helical wheel are found in abundance in the sample.     

Proline in alpha-helix: stability and conformation studied by dynamics simulation

Free-energy simulations have been used to estimate the change in the conformational stability of short polyalanine alpha-helices when one of the alanines is replaced by a proline residue. For substituting proline in the middle of the helix the change in free energy of folding (delta delta G degrees) was calculated as 14 kJ/mol (3.4 kcal/mol), in excellent agreement with the one available experimental value. The helix containing proline was found to be strongly kinked; the free energy for reducing the angle of the kink from 40 degrees to 15 degrees was calculated, and found to be small. A tendency to alternate hydrogen bonding schemes was observed in the proline-containing helix. These observations for the oligopeptide agree well with the observation of a range of kink angles (18-35 degrees) and variety of hydrogen bonding schemes, in the rare instances where proline occurs in helices in globular proteins. For substituting proline at the N-terminus of the helix the change in free energy of folding (delta delta G degrees) was calculated as -4 kJ/mol in the first helical position (N1) and +6 kJ/mol in the second helical position (N2). The observed frequent occurrence of proline in position N1 in alpha-helices in proteins therefore has its origin in stability differences of secondary structure. The conclusion reached here that proline may be a better helix former in position N1 than (even) alanine, and thus be a helix initiator may be testable experimentally by measurements of fraction helical conformation of individual residues in oligopeptides of appropriate sequence. The relevance of these results in regards to the frequent occurrence of proline-containing helices in certain membrane proteins is discussed.     

Addition of side chain interactions to modified Lifson-Roig helix-coil theory: application to energetics of phenylalanine-methionine interactions.

We introduce here i, i + 3 and i, i + 4 side chain interactions into the modified Lifson-Roig helix-coil theory of Doig et al. (1994, Biochemistry 33:3396-3403). The helix/coil equilibrium is a function of initiation, propagation, capping, and side chain interaction parameters. If each of these parameters is known, the helix content of any isolated peptide can be predicted. The model considers every possible conformation of a peptide, is not limited to peptides with only a single helical segment, and has physically meaningful parameters. We apply the theory to measure the i, i + 4 interaction energies between Phe and Met side chains. Peptides with these residues spaced i, i + 4 are significantly more helical than controls where they are spaced i, i + 5. Application of the model yields delta G for the Phe-Met orientation to be -0.75 kcal.mol-1, whereas that for the Met-Phe orientation is -0.54 kcal.mol-1. These orientational preferences can be explained, in part, by rotamer preferences for the interacting side chains. We place Phe-Met i, i + 4 at the N-terminus, the C-terminus, and in the center of the host peptide. The model quantitatively predicts the observed helix contents using a single parameter for the side chain-side chain interaction energy. This result indicates that the model works well even when the interaction is at different locations in the helix.     

Helix capping in the GCN4 leucine zipper.

Capping interactions associated with specific sequences at or near the ends of alpha-helices are important determinants of the stability of protein secondary and tertiary structure. We investigate here the role of the helix-capping motif Ser-X-X-Glu, a sequence that occurs frequently at the N termini of alpha helices in proteins, on the conformation and stability of the GCN4 leucine zipper. The 1.8 A resolution crystal structure of the capped molecule reveals distinct conformations, packing geometries and hydrogen-bonding networks at the amino terminus of the two helices in the leucine zipper dimer. The free energy of helix stabilization associated with the hydrogen-bonding and hydrophobic interactions in this capping structure is -1.2 kcal/mol, evaluated from thermal unfolding experiments. A single cap thus contributes appreciably to stabilizing the terminated helix and thereby the native state. These results suggest that helix capping plays a further role in protein folding, providing a sensitive connector linking alpha-helix formation to the developing tertiary structure of a protein.     

Sequence and structure patterns in proteins from an analysis of the shortest helices: implications for helix nucleation

The shortest helices (three-length 3(10) and four-length alpha), most abundant among helices of different lengths, have been analyzed from a database of protein structures. A characteristic feature of three-length 3(10)-helices is the shifted backbone conformation for the C-terminal residue (phi,psi angles: -95 degrees,0 degrees ), compared to the rest of the helix (-62 degrees,-24 degrees ). The deviation can be attributed to the release of electrostatic repulsion between the carbonyl oxygen atoms at the two C-terminal residues and further stabilization (due to a more linear geometry) of an intrahelical hydrogen bond. A consequence of this non-canonical C-terminal backbone conformation can be a potential origin of helix kinks when a 3(10)-helix is sequence-contiguous at the alpha-helix N-terminal. An analysis of hydrogen bonding, as well as hydrophobic interactions in the shortest helices shows that capping interactions, some of them not observed for longer helices, dominate at the N termini. Further, consideration of the distribution of amino acid residues indicates that the shortest helices resemble the N-terminal end of alpha-helices rather than the C terminus, implying that the folding of helices may be initiated at the N-terminal end, which does not get propagated in the case of the shortest helices. Finally, pairwise comparison of beta-turns and the shortest helices, based on correlation matrices of site-specific amino acid composition, and the relative abundance of these short secondary structural elements, leads to a helix nucleation scheme that considers the formation of an isolated beta-turn (and not an alpha-turn) as the helix nucleation step, with shortest 3(10)-helices as intermediates between the shortest alpha-helix and the beta-turn. Our results ascribe an important role played by shortest 3(10)-helices in proteins with important structural and folding implications.     

Sparsely populated residue conformations in protein structures: Revisiting “experimental” Ramachandran maps

The Ramachandran map clearly delineates the regions of accessible conformational (φ–ψ) space for amino acid residues in proteins. Experimental distributions of φ, ψ values in high‐resolution protein structures, reveal sparsely populated zones within fully allowed regions and distinct clusters in apparently disallowed regions. Conformational space has been divided into 14 distinct bins. Residues adopting these relatively rare conformations are presented and amino acid propensities for these regions are estimated. Inspection of specific examples in a completely “arid”, fully allowed region in the top left quadrant establishes that side‐chain and backbone interactions may provide the energetic compensation necessary for populating this region of φ–ψ space. Asn, Asp, and His residues showed the highest propensities in this region. The two distinct clusters in the bottom right quadrant which are formally disallowed on strict steric considerations correspond to the gamma turn (C7 axial) conformation (Bin 12 ) and the i + 1 position of Type II′ β turns (Bin 13) . Of the 516 non‐Gly residues in Bin 13 , 384 occupied the i + 1 position of Type II′ β turns. Further examination of these turn segments revealed a high propensity to occur at the N‐terminus of helices and as a tight turn in β hairpins. The β strand–helix motif with the Type II′ β turn as a connecting element was also found in as many as 57 examples. Proteins 2014; 82:1101–1112. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Sequence and conformational preferences at termini of α‐helices in membrane proteins: Role of the helix environment

α‐helices are amongst the most common secondary structural elements seen in membrane proteins and are packed in the form of helix bundles. These α‐helices encounter varying external environments (hydrophobic, hydrophilic) that may influence the sequence preferences at their N and C‐termini. The role of the external environment in stabilization of the helix termini in membrane proteins is still unknown. Here we analyze α‐helices in a high‐resolution dataset of integral α‐helical membrane proteins and establish that their sequence and conformational preferences differ from those in globular proteins. We specifically examine these preferences at the N and C‐termini in helices initiating/terminating inside the membrane core as well as in linkers connecting these transmembrane helices. We find that the sequence preferences and structural motifs at capping (Ncap and Ccap) and near‐helical (N' and C') positions are influenced by a combination of features including the membrane environment and the innate helix initiation and termination property of residues forming structural motifs. We also find that a large number of helix termini which do not form any particular capping motif are stabilized by formation of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions contributed from the neighboring helices in the membrane protein. We further validate the sequence preferences obtained from our analysis with data from an ultradeep sequencing study that identifies evolutionarily conserved amino acids in the rat neurotensin receptor. The results from our analysis provide insights for the secondary structure prediction, modeling and design of membrane proteins. Proteins 2014; 82:3420–3436. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Stable proline box motif at the N-terminal end of alpha-helices.

We describe a novel N-terminal alpha-helix local motif that involves three hydrophobic residues and a Pro residue (Pro-box motif). Database analysis shows that when Pro is the N-cap of an alpha-helix the distribution of amino acids in adjacent positions changes dramatically with respect to the average distribution in an alpha-helix, but not when Pro is at position N1. N-cap Pro residues are usually associated to Ile and Leu, at position N', Val at position N3 and a hydrophobic residue (h) at position N4. The side chain of the N-cap Pro packs against Val, while the hydrophobic residues at positions N' and N4 make favorable interactions. To analyze the role of this putative motif (sequence fingerprint hPXXhh), we have synthesized a series of peptides and analyzed them by circular dichroism (CD) and NMR. We find that this motif is formed in peptides, and that the accompanying hydrophobic interactions contribute up to 1.2 kcal/mol to helix stability. The fact that some of the residues in this fingerprint are not good N-cap and helix formers results in a small overall stabilization of the alpha-helix with respect to other peptides having Gly as the N-cap and Ala at N3 and N4. This suggests that the Pro-box motif will not specially contribute to protein stability but to the specificity of its fold. In fact, 80% of the sequences that contain the fingerprint sequence in the protein database are adopting the described structural motif, and in none of them is the helix extended to place Pro at the more favorable N1 position.     

A conformational equilibrium in a protein fragment caused by two consecutive capping boxes: 1H-, 13C-NMR, and mutational analysis.

The conformational properties of an 18 residues peptide spanning the entire sequence, L1KTPA5QFDAD10ELRAA15MKG, of the first helix (A-helix) of domain 2 of annexin I, were thoroughly investigated. This fragment exhibits several singular features, and in particular, two successive potential capping boxes, T3xxQ6 and D8xxE11. The former corresponds to the native hydrogen bond network stabilizing the alpha helix N-terminus in the protein; the latter is a non-native capping box able to break the helix at residue D8, and is observed in the domain 2 partially folded state. Using 2D-NMR techniques, we showed that two main populations of conformers coexist in aqueous solution. The first corresponds to a single helix extending from T3 to K17. The second corresponds to a broken helix at residue Ds. Four mutants, T3A, F7A, D8A, and E11A, were designed to further analyze the role of key amino acids in the equilibrium between the two ensembles of conformers. The sensitivity of NMR parameters to account for the variations in the populations of conformers was evaluated for each peptide. Our data show the delta13Calpha chemical shift to be the most relevant parameter. We used it to estimate the population ratio in the various peptides between the two main ensembles of conformers, the full helix and the broken helix. For the WT, E11A, and F7A peptides, these ratios are respectively 35/65, 60/40, 60/40. Our results were compared to the data obtained from helix/coil transition algorithms.     

Insights into thermal resistance of proteins from the intrinsic stability of their α-helices

To investigate the role of α helices in protein thermostability, we compared energy characteristics of α helices from thermophilic and mesophilic proteins belonging to four protein families of known three-dimensional structure, for at least one member of each family. The changes in intrinsic free energy of α-helix formation were estimated using the statistical mechanical theory for describing helix/coil transitions in peptide helices [Munoz, V., Serrano, L. Nature Struc. Biol. 1:399–409, 1994; Munoz, V., Serrano, L. J. Mol. Biol. 245:275–296, 1995; Munoz, V., Serrano, L. J. Mol. Biol. 245:297–308, 1995]. Based on known sequences of mesophilic and thermophilic RecA proteins we found that (1) a high stability of α helices is necessary but is not a sufficient condition for thermostability of RecA proteins, (2) the total helix stability, rather than that of individual helices, is the factor determining protein thermostability, and (3) two facets of intrahelical interactions, the intrinsic helical propensities of amino acids and the side chain–side chain interactions, are the main contributors to protein thermostability. Similar analysis applied to families of L-lactate dehydrogenases, seryl-tRNA synthetases, and aspartate amino transferases led us to conclude that an enhanced total stability of α helices is a general feature of many thermophilic proteins. The magnitude of the observed decrease in intrinsic free energy on α-helix formation of several thermoresistant proteins was found to be sufficient to explain the experimentally determined increase of their thermostability. Free energies of intrahelical interactions of different RecA proteins calculated at three temperatures that are thought to be close to its normal environmental conditions were found to be approximately equal. This indicates that certain flexibility of RecA protein structure is an essential factor for protein function. All RecA proteins analyzed fell into three temperature-dependent classes of similar α-helix stability (ΔG_int = 45.0 ± 2.0 kcal/mol). These classes were consistent with the natural origin of the proteins. Based on the sequences of protein α helices with optimized arrangement of stabilizing interactions, a natural reserve of RecA protein thermoresistance was estimated to be sufficient for conformational stability of the protein at nearly 200°C. Proteins 29:309–320, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Solution structure of the osteogenic 1-31 fragment of the human parathyroid hormone

The solution conformations of a selectively osteogenic 1-31 fragment of the human parathyroid hormone (hPTH), hPTH(1-31)NH(2), have been characterized by use of very high field NMR spectroscopy at 800 MHz. The combination of the CalphaH proton and (13)Calpha chemical shifts, (3)J(NH)(alpha) coupling constants, NH proton temperature coefficients, and backbone NOEs reveals that the hPTH(1-31)NH(2) peptide has well-formed helical structures localized in two distinct segments of the polypeptide backbone. There are also many characteristic NOEs defining specific side-chain/backbone and side-chain/side-chain contacts within both helical structures. The solution structure of hPTH(1-31)NH(2) contains a short N-terminal helical segment for residues 3-11, including the helix capping residues 3 and 11 and a long C-terminal helix for residues 16-30. The two helical structures are reinforced by well-defined capping motifs and side-chain packing interactions within and at both ends of these helices. On one face of the C-terminal helix, there are side-chain pairs of Glu22-Arg25, Glu22-Lys26, and Arg25-Gln29 that can form ion-pair and/or hydrogen bonding interactions. On the opposite face of this helix, there are characteristic hydrophobic interactions involving the aromatic side chain of Trp23 packing against the aliphatic side chains of Leu15, Leu24, Lys27, and Leu28. There is also a linear array of hydrophobic residues from Val2, to Leu7, to Leu11 and continuing on to residues His14 and Leu15 in the hinge region and to Trp23 in the C-terminal helix. Capping and hydrophobic interactions at the end of the N-terminal and at the beginning of the C-terminal helix appear to consolidate the helical structures into a V-shaped overall conformation for at least the folded population of the hPTH(1-31)NH(2) peptide. Stabilization of well-folded conformations in this linear 1-31 peptide fragment and possibly other analogues of human PTH may have a significant impact on the biological activities of the PTH peptides in general and specifically for the osteogenic/anabolic activities of bone-building PTH analogues.