Interaction of soluble CD4 with the chemokine receptor CCR5

The chemokine receptor CCR5 is constitutively associated with the T cell co-receptor CD4 in plasma cell membranes. The CD4-CCR5 complex exhibits distinct binding properties for macrophage inflammatory protein 1beta (MIP-1beta) and enhanced G-protein signaling as compared with those of CCR5 alone. Here we report that recombinant soluble CD4, when refolded into its dimeric form, allosterically modulates CCR5 and decreases the affinity for its natural ligand MIP-1beta. Monomeric soluble CD4 had little inhibitory effect on CCR5. In contrast, the two-domain amino-terminal fragment of soluble CD4 was able to completely inhibit the interaction of CCR5 with MIP-1beta. Thus, we suggest that various conformational states of CD4 exist, which differ markedly with regard to inhibiting the interaction of CCR5 with its ligand MIP-1beta. R5-tropic HIV-1 glycoprotein 120, but not interleukin-16, the natural agonist, or X4-tropic glycoprotein 120, inhibited MIP-1beta binding to CCR5 in the presence of monomeric and dimeric soluble CD4.     

Tyrosine sulfation influences the chemokine binding selectivity of peptides derived from chemokine receptor CCR3

The interactions of chemokines with their G protein-coupled receptors play critical roles in the control of leukocyte trafficking in normal homeostasis and in inflammatory responses. Tyrosine sulfation is a common post-translational modification in the amino-terminal regions of chemokine receptors. However, tyrosine sulfation of chemokine receptors is commonly incomplete or heterogeneous. To investigate the possibility that differential sulfation of two adjacent tyrosine residues could bias the responses of chemokine receptor CCR3 to different chemokines, we have studied the binding of three chemokines (eotaxin-1/CCL11, eotaxin-2/CCL24, and eotaxin-3/CCL26) to an N-terminal CCR3-derived peptide in each of its four possible sulfation states. Whereas the nonsulfated peptide binds to the three chemokines with approximately equal affinity, sulfation of Tyr-16 gives rise to 9-16-fold selectivity for eotaxin-1 over the other two chemokines. Subsequent sulfation of Tyr-17 contributes additively to the affinity for eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-2 but cooperatively to the affinity for eotaxin-3. The doubly sulfated peptide selectively binds to both eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-3 approximately 10-fold more tightly than to eotaxin-2. Nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift mapping indicates that these variations in affinity probably result from only subtle differences in the chemokine surfaces interacting with these receptor peptides. These data support the proposal that variations in sulfation states or levels may regulate the responsiveness of chemokine receptors to their cognate chemokines.     

Characterization of binding between the chemokine eotaxin and peptides derived from the chemokine receptor CCR3

The CC chemokine eotaxin plays a predominant role in eosinophil trafficking in vivo by specifically activating the chemokine receptor CCR3. We have screened a series of synthetic peptides corresponding to extracellular regions of CCR3 for their ability to bind eotaxin. A peptide corresponding to the N terminus of CCR3 (CCR3-(1-35)) bound to eotaxin with a dissociation constant of 80 +/- 38 micrometer. However, linear or cyclic peptides derived from the first and third extracellular loops of CCR3 did not bind to eotaxin. Linear and cyclic peptides derived from the second extracellular loop precipitated upon addition of eotaxin. (1)H-(15)N correlation NMR spectroscopy indicated that an extended groove in the eotaxin surface, whose edges are defined by the N-loop, 3(10)-helical turn, and beta(2)-beta(3) hairpin, is the most likely binding surface for CCR3-(1-35). NMR assignments for CCR3-(1-35) were obtained using two-dimensional and three-dimensional homonuclear NMR experiments. (15)N-Filtered TOCSY spectra indicated that the central region of CCR3-(1-35), surrounding the DDYY sequence, is involved in the interaction with eotaxin. This was supported by the observation that a truncated N-terminal peptide (CCR3-(8-23)) binds to eotaxin with a dissociation constant of 136 +/- 23 micrometer, only slightly weaker than the full-length N-terminal peptide. Taken together with previous studies, these results suggest that interactions between the N-loop/beta(3) regions of chemokines and the N-terminal regions of their receptors may be a conserved feature of chemokine-receptor complexes across the CC, CXC, and C chemokine subfamilies. However, the low affinity of the interactions observed in these studies suggests the existence of additional binding regions in both the chemokines and the receptors.     

Regulation of the human chemokine receptor CCR1. Cross-regulation by CXCR1 and CXCR2

To investigate the regulation of the CCR1 chemokine receptor, a rat basophilic leukemia (RBL-2H3) cell line was modified to stably express epitope-tagged receptor. These cells responded to RANTES (regulated upon activation normal T expressed and secreted), macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, and monocyte chemotactic protein-2 to mediate phospholipase C activation, intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization and exocytosis. Upon activation, CCR1 underwent phosphorylation and desensitization as measured by diminished GTPase stimulation and Ca(2+) mobilization. Alanine substitution of specific serine and threonine residues (S2 and S3) or truncation of the cytoplasmic tail (DeltaCCR1) of CCR1 abolished receptor phosphorylation and desensitization of G protein activation but did not abolish desensitization of Ca(2+) mobilization. S2, S3, and DeltaCCR1 were also resistant to internalization, mediated greater phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and sustained Ca(2+) mobilization, and were only partially desensitized by RANTES, relative to S1 and CCR1. To study CCR1 cross-regulation, RBL cells co-expressing CCR1 and receptors for interleukin-8 (CXCR1, CXCR2, or a phosphorylation-deficient mutant of CXCR2, 331T) were produced. Interleukin-8 stimulation of CXCR1 or CXCR2 cross-phosphorylated CCR1 and cross-desensitized its ability to stimulate GTPase activity and Ca(2+) mobilization. Interestingly, CCR1 cross-phosphorylated and cross-desensitized CXCR2, but not CXCR1. Ca(2+) mobilization by S3 and DeltaCCR1 were also cross-desensitized by CXCR1 and CXCR2 despite lack of receptor phosphorylation. In contrast to wild type CCR1, S3 and DeltaCCR1, which produced sustained signals, cross-phosphorylated and cross-desensitized responses to CXCR1 as well as CXCR2. Taken together, these results indicate that CCR1-mediated responses are regulated at several steps in the signaling pathway, by receptor phosphorylation at the level of receptor/G protein coupling and by an unknown mechanism at the level of phospholipase C activation. Moreover selective cross-regulation among chemokine receptors is, in part, a consequence of the strength of signaling (i.e. greater phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and sustained Ca(2+) mobilization) which is inversely correlated with the receptor's susceptibility to phosphorylation. Since many chemokines activate multiple chemokine receptors, selective cross-regulation among such receptors may play a role in their immunomodulation.     

Core exploration in optimization of chemokine receptor CCR4 antagonists

The design, synthesis, and SAR studies of 'core' variations led to identification of novel, selective, and potent small molecule antagonist (22) of the CC chemokine receptor-4 (CCR4) with improved in vitro activity and liability profile. Compound 22 was efficacious in a murine allergic inflammation model (ED50 approximately 10 mg/kg).     

Small molecule antagonists of the CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4)

The identification, optimization, and structure-activity relationship (SAR) of small-molecule CCR4 antagonists is described. An initial screening hit with micromolar potency was identified that was optimized to sub-micromolar binding potency by enantiomer resolution, halogenation of the naphthalene ring, and extension of the alkyl chain linker between the central piperidine ring and the terminal aryl group. An antagonist was identified that showed good cross-reactivity against the mouse receptor and inhibited CCR4-based cell recruitment in dose-dependent fashion.     

Chemokine-like factor 1 is a functional ligand for CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4)

Chemokine-like factor 1 (CKLF1) exhibits chemotactic effects on leukocytes. Its amino acid sequence shares similarity with those of TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22, the cognate ligands for CCR4. The chemotactic effects of CKLF1 for CCR4-transfected cells could be desensitized by TARC/CCL17 and markedly inhibited by PTX. CKLF1 induced a calcium flux in CCR4-transfected cells and fully desensitized a subsequent response to TARC/CCL17, and TARC/CCL17 could partly desensitize the response to CKLF1. CKLF1 caused significant receptor internalization in pCCR4-EGFP transfected cells. Taken together, CKLF1 is a novel functional ligand for CCR4.     

Evidence for CD4-enchanced signaling through the chemokine receptor CCR5

The chemokine receptor CCR5 is constitutively associated with the T cell co-receptor CD4 in plasma cell membranes, but the physiological role of this interaction has not been elucidated. Here we show that detergent-solubilized, purified CCR5 can directly associate with purified soluble fragments of the extracellular portion of CD4. We further demonstrate that the physical association of CCR5 and CD4 in membrane vesicles results in the formation of a receptor complex that exhibits macrophage inflammatory protein 1beta (MIP-1beta) binding properties that are distinct from CCR5. The affinity of the CD4-CCR5 complex for MIP-1beta was 3.5-fold lower than for CCR5, but the interaction of CD4 and CCR5 resulted in a receptor complex that exhibited enhanced G-protein signaling as compared with CCR5 alone. MIP-1beta-induced G-protein activation was further increased by simultaneous stimulation of CD4 with its natural agonist, interleukin-16. Thus, the physical association of CD4 and CCR5 results in receptor cross-talk with allosteric CD4-dependent regulation of the binding and signaling properties of CCR5. Although the precise physiological role of the CD4 effects on CCR5-mediated signaling remains unknown, one can speculate that the cross-talk is a component of mechanisms involved in the fine tuning of immune system cell responses.     

Blocking HIV-1 infection via CCR5 and CXCR4 receptors by acting in trans on the CCR2 chemokine receptor

The identification of chemokine receptors as HIV-1 coreceptors has focused research on developing strategies to prevent HIV-1 infection. We generated CCR2-01, a CCR2 receptor-specific monoclonal antibody that neither competes with the chemokine CCL2 for binding nor triggers signaling, but nonetheless blocks replication of monotropic (R5) and T-tropic (X4) HIV-1 strains. This effect is explained by the ability of CCR2-01 to induce oligomerization of CCR2 with the CCR5 or CXCR4 viral coreceptors. HIV-1 infection through CCR5 and CXCR4 receptors can thus be prevented in the absence of steric hindrance or receptor downregulation by acting in trans on a receptor that is rarely used by the virus to infect cells.     

Syntheses and SAR studies of 4-(heteroarylpiperdin-1-yl-methyl)-pyrrolidin-1-yl-acetic acid antagonists of the human CCR5 chemokine receptor

Efforts toward the exploration of the title compounds as CCR5 antagonists are disclosed. The basis for such work stems from the fact that cellular proliferation of HIV-1 requires the cooperative assistance of both CCR5 and CD4 receptors. The synthesis and SAR of pyrrolidineacetic acid derivatives as CCR5 antagonists displaying potent binding and antiviral properties in a HeLa cell-based HIV-1 infectivity assay are discussed.     

The human CC chemokine MIP-1beta dimer is not competent to bind to the CCR5 receptor

Chemokine dimerization has been the subject of much interest in recent years as evidence has accumulated that different quaternary states of chemokines play different biological roles; the monomer is believed to be the receptor-binding unit, whereas the dimer has been implicated in binding cell surface glycosaminoglycans. However, although several studies have provided evidence for this paradigm by making monomeric chemokine variants or dimer-impaired chemokines, few have provided direct evidence of the receptor function of a chemokine dimer. We have produced a covalent dimer of the CC chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta (MIP-1beta) by placing a disulfide bond at the center of its dimer interface through a single amino acid substitution (MIP-1beta-A10C). This variant was shown to be a nondissociating dimer by SDS-PAGE and analytical ultracentrifugation. NMR reveals a structure largely the same as the wild type protein. In studies of glycosaminoglycan binding, MIP-1beta-A10C binds to a heparin-Sepharose column as tightly as the wild type protein and more tightly than monomeric variants. However, MIP-1beta-A10C neither binds nor activates the MIP-1beta receptor CCR5. It was found that the ability to activate CCR5 was recovered upon reduction of the intermolecular disulfide cross-link by incubation with 1 mm dithiothreitol. This work provides the first definitive evidence that the CC chemokine MIP-1beta dimer is not able to bind or activate its receptor and implicates the CC chemokine monomer as the sole receptor-interacting unit.     

Selective CCL5/RANTES-induced mast cell migration through interactions with chemokine receptors CCR1 and CCR4

Mast cells (MCs) accumulate at sites of allergic mucosal inflammation where they act as central effector and regulatory cells. Because chemokines are of vital importance in directing inflammatory leukocytes to the sites of inflammations, we have investigated the expression and function of CC-chemokine receptor (CCR) on human MCs. Two previously unrecognized MC-chemokine receptors, CCR1 and CCR4, could be identified on cord blood-derived MCs (CBMCs). CCR1 and CCR4 expressed on CBMCs exhibited a unique response profile. Of seven CCR1 and CCR4 agonists tested, only CCL5/RANTES act as an agonist inducing chemotaxis. The migration could be partially blocked by specific antibodies against CCR1 or CCR4, while a complete inhibition was achieved when both CCR1 and CCR4 were blocked. These results demonstrate that both CCR1 and CCR4 are functional receptors on human mast cells with capacity to mediate migration towards CCL5.     

Rescue of HIV-1 receptor function through cooperation between different forms of the CCR5 chemokine receptor

Interaction of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) envelope glycoproteins with the CCR5 chemokine receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor, triggers a membrane fusion process and virus entry. Cooperation for HIV-1 receptor activity was observed when two forms of CCR5 were coexpressed, either the wild-type (WT) receptor and a defective mutant with deletion of the amino-terminal (NT) extracellular domain or the latter deltaNT mutant and a human-mouse CCR5 chimera bearing the NT domain from human CCR5. Cooperation was most efficient when the two forms of CCR5 were in a 1:1 ratio. It was not observed between the CCR5 deltaNT mutant and a chimeric receptor (5444) in which the NT domain of CCR5 was in the context of another G-protein-coupled receptor, the HIV-1 receptor CXCR4. These results suggested that physical association between two forms of CCR5 was required for their cooperation. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments in transfected cell lysates indeed showed that the deltaNT CCR5 mutant formed oligomeric complexes with the WT CCR5 or the HMMM chimera but not with the CXCR4-derived chimera 5444. These observations suggest that the formation of CCR5 oligomers is a constitutive process independent from activation by chemokine ligands. The interaction of HIV-1 with independent subunits of CCR5 oligomers could favor the local recruitment of fusiogenic proteins and the formation of a fusion pore.     

Role of the chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR2 and CCR4 in the pathogenesis of experimental dengue infection in mice

Dengue virus (DENV), a mosquito-borne flavivirus, is a public health problem in many tropical countries. Recent clinical data have shown an association between levels of different chemokines in plasma and severity of dengue. We evaluated the role of CC chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR2 and CCR4 in an experimental model of DENV-2 infection in mice. Infection of mice induced evident clinical disease and tissue damage, including thrombocytopenia, hemoconcentration, lymphopenia, increased levels of transaminases and pro-inflammatory cytokines, and lethality in WT mice. Importantly, infected WT mice presented increased levels of chemokines CCL2/JE, CCL3/MIP-1α and CCL5/RANTES in spleen and liver. CCR1^-/- mice had a mild phenotype with disease presentation and lethality similar to those of WT mice. In CCR2^-/- mice, lethality, liver damage, levels of IL-6 and IFN-γ, and leukocyte activation were attenuated. However, thrombocytopenia, hemoconcentration and systemic TNF-α levels were similar to infected WT mice. Infection enhanced levels of CCL17/TARC, a CCR4 ligand. In CCR4^-/- mice, lethality, tissue injury and systemic inflammation were markedly decreased. Despite differences in disease presentation in CCR-deficient mice, there was no significant difference in viral load. In conclusion, activation of chemokine receptors has discrete roles in the pathogenesis of dengue infection. These studies suggest that the chemokine storm that follows severe primary dengue infection associates mostly to development of disease rather than protection.     

Expression of the chemokine eotaxin and its receptor, CCR3, in human endometrium

Eosinophils are present in human endometrium only immediately before and during menstruation, suggesting a role in that process. The expression of the eosinophil chemoattractant, eotaxin, and its receptor, CCR3, within the human endometrium were investigated by immunohistochemical analysis of tissue sections spanning the entire menstrual cycle. Eotaxin was localized to perivascular cells in the late secretory phase, and it was also identified in eosinophils. However, the highest levels of this chemokine were present in both luminal and glandular epithelial cells during the proliferative and secretory phases of the cycle. Treatment of endometrial tissue with monensin, which blocks protein secretion, increased epithelial immunoreactive eotaxin, substantiating synthesis in these cells. Although the CCR3 receptor was expressed by eosinophils, it was also strongly expressed by endometrial epithelial cells. The CCR3 receptor on purified, cultured endometrial epithelial cells was functional, as assessed by a transient Ca(2+) flux in response to eotaxin. These analyses demonstrate that eotaxin is expressed by endometrial cells and may therefore be involved in the recruitment of eosinophils into this tissue premenstrually. However, the observation that this chemokine and the CCR3 molecule are strongly expressed by epithelial cells throughout the cycle suggests that these proteins may have additional important functions within the endometrium.     

Mice lacking the chemokine receptor CCR1 show increased susceptibility to Toxoplasma gondii infection

Chemokines are critical for the recruitment of effector immune cells to sites of infection. Mice lacking the chemokine receptor CCR1 have defects in neutrophil trafficking and proliferation. In the present study, we tested the susceptibility of CCR1 knockout mice to infection with the obligate intracellular protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii. In comparison with parental wild-type mice, CCR1(-/-) mice exhibited dramatically increased mortality to T. gondii in association with an increased tissue parasite load. No differences were observed in Ag-specific T cell proliferation or in cytokine responses between mutant and wild-type mice. However, the influx of PMNs to the peripheral blood and to the liver were reduced in CCR1(-/-) mice during early infection. Our results suggest that CCR1-dependent migration of neutrophils to the blood and tissues may have a significant impact in controlling parasite replication.     

4,4-Disubstituted cyclohexylamine based CCR5 chemokine receptor antagonists as anti-HIV-1 agents

A series of 4,4-disubstituted cyclohexylamine based CCR5 antagonists has been designed and synthesized. Their antiviral structure–activity relationship has been extensively explored.     

Hypoxia inhibits the expression of the CCR5 chemokine receptor in macrophages

Hypoxia, a decrease in oxygen tension occurring in pathological tissues, has a profound effect on macrophage functions. Here, we provide the first evidence that hypoxia inhibits CCR5 chemokine receptor expression in mouse macrophages. CCR5 was constitutively expressed in macrophages and upregulated by IFNgamma. Hypoxia downregulated both constitutive and IFNgamma-induced CCR5 mRNA and protein. Reoxygenation of hypoxic cells reverted CCR5 inhibition. CCR5 upregulation by IL-10, LPS, and IL-4 was also antagonized by hypoxia. CCR5 inhibition may be a way to retain/concentrate recruited macrophages at hypoxic sites or a feedback mechanism to control the autocrine activation of macrophages which produce CCR5 ligands.