Modification of transduction mechanisms in the frog's olfactory mucosa using a thiol reagent as olfactory stimulus

The effects of the thiol-specific reagent N-ethylmaleimide (NEM)used in the vapour phase have been tested on the olfactory epitheliumof the frog when recording the electro-olfactogram (EOG) andspike activity from single receptor cells. The reagent was deliveredalone or mixed with the odorant isoamyl acetate. At low concentrationthe reagent induced slow potentials resembling simple EOGs.At higher concentrations (20% of the saturated vapour) threenegative and one positive slow components were observed in theresponse. A complex relationship was found between the amplitudeof the slow potential and the concentration of the reagent.Repeated stimulations at high concentration caused the suppressionof the negative voltage transients and the development of thepositive component. NEM vapour elicited spike discharges insome of the recorded units, with the responses resembling thoseevoked by usual odorants. After long-lasting stimulations (30 sec) with NEM, the receptorsfailed to respond to both reagent and odorant. This suppressionof response could be partly prevented by exposing the olfactoryepithelium to the odorant vapour before and during the exposureto the reagent (protection). The results indicate that NEM acts on the olfactory epitheliumin several ways, including an odorant-like action on olfactoryreceptor sites. An effect on the supporting cells is also suggested.Hypotheses for explaining the protection mechanism are considered.     

Odorant Metabolism Catalyzed by Olfactory Mucosal Enzymes Influences Peripheral Olfactory Responses in Rats

A large set of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes (XMEs), such as the cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (CYPs), esterases and transferases, are highly expressed in mammalian olfactory mucosa (OM). These enzymes are known to catalyze the biotransformation of exogenous compounds to facilitate elimination. However, the functions of these enzymes in the olfactory epithelium are not clearly understood. In addition to protecting against inhaled toxic compounds, these enzymes could also metabolize odorant molecules, and thus modify their stimulating properties or inactivate them. In the present study, we investigated the in vitro biotransformation of odorant molecules in the rat OM and assessed the impact of this metabolism on peripheral olfactory responses. Rat OM was found to efficiently metabolize quinoline, coumarin and isoamyl acetate. Quinoline and coumarin are metabolized by CYPs whereas isoamyl acetate is hydrolyzed by carboxylesterases. Electro-olfactogram (EOG) recordings revealed that the hydroxylated metabolites derived from these odorants elicited lower olfactory response amplitudes than the parent molecules. We also observed that glucurono-conjugated derivatives induced no olfactory signal. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the local application of a CYP inhibitor on rat olfactory epithelium increased EOG responses elicited by quinoline and coumarin. Similarly, the application of a carboxylesterase inhibitor increased the EOG response elicited by isoamyl acetate. This increase in EOG amplitude provoked by XME inhibitors is likely due to enhanced olfactory sensory neuron activation in response to odorant accumulation. Taken together, these findings strongly suggest that biotransformation of odorant molecules by enzymes localized to the olfactory mucosa may change the odorant’s stimulating properties and may facilitate the clearance of odorants to avoid receptor saturation.     

Odorant-induced hyperpolarization and suppression of cAMP-activated current in newt olfactory receptor neurons

Although many studies have reported that odorants can elicit inhibitory responses as well as excitatory responses in vertebrate olfactory receptor neurons, the cellular mechanisms that underlie this inhibition are unclear. Here we examine the inhibitory effect of odorants on newt olfactory receptor neurons using whole cell patch clamp recording. At high concentrations, odorant stimulation decreased the membrane conductance and inhibited depolarization. Various odorants (anisole, isoamyl acetate, cineole, limonene and isovaleric acid) suppressed the depolarizing current in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, one odorant could suppress the depolarization caused by another odorant. The depolarization caused by isoamyl acetate was inhibited by anisole in cells that were excited by isoamyl acetate but not by anisole. Odorants were able to hyperpolarize cells that were depolarized by cAMP-induced conductance. Given that this inhibitory effect of odorants can affect excitation caused by other odorants, we suggest that it might play a role in coding odorants in olfactory receptor neurons.     

Differential ion dependence of frog olfactory responses to various odorants.

1. Dependence of the fron olfactory bulbar responses on NaCl concentration greatly varied from odorant to odorant. The responses to odorants such as 1-carvone and isoamyl acetate were essentially unchanged by removal of NaCl, while those to odorant such as citral and beta-ionone were greatly decreased by removal of NaCl. 2. The NaCl requirement for the responses to certain odorants was greatly decreased by an increase in pH or temperature of the stimulating solution. 3. It was concluded that changes in ion permeability at the apical membranes of olfactory cells including olfactory ciliary membranes are not involved in generation of the in vivo olfactory responses to certain odorants.     

Response patterns of single neurons in the tortoise olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb

The responses to odor stimulation of 40 single units in the olfactory mucosa and of 18 units in the olfactory bulb of the tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) were recorded with indium-filled, Pt-black-tipped microelectrodes. The test battery consisted of 27 odorants which were proved effective by recording from small bundles of olfactory nerve. Two concentrations of each odorant were employed. These values were adjusted for response magnitudes equal to those for amyl acetate at –2.5 and –3.5 log concentration in olfactory twig recording. Varying concentrations were generated by an injection-type olfactometer. The mucosal responses were exclusively facilitory with a peak frequency of 16 impulses/sec. 19 mucosal units responded to at least one odorant and each unit was sensitive to a limited number of odorants (1–15). The sensitivity pattern of each unit was highly individual, with no clear-cut types, either chemical or qualitative, emerging. Of the 18 olfactory bulb units sampled, all responded to at least one odorant. The maximum frequency observed during a response was 39 impulses/sec. The bulbar neurons can be classified into two types. There are neurons that respond exclusively with facilitation and others that respond with facilitation to some odorants and with inhibition to others. Qualitatively or chemically similar odorants did not generate similar patterns across bulbar units.     

Effects of antibodies against odorant binding proteins on electrophysiological responses to odorants

Monoclonal antibodies against two olfactory mucosal proteins, one with affinity for anisole-like and the other for benzaldehyde-like compounds, were applied to mouse olfactory epithelium. Responses to three odorants (anisole, benzaldehyde and amyl acetate) were measured. Of 26 antibodies, three (12%) inhibited responses only to the odorant with affinity for the antigen, nine (35%) inhibited responses to all three odorants, and 14 (54%) were without effect. None reduced responses by as much as 50%. The data support the hypothesis that there is a class of related proteins in olfactory neuronal cell membranes that function as receptor molecules and that other mechanisms also mediate odorant stimulation.     

Olfactory receptor antagonism between odorants

The detection of thousands of volatile odorants is mediated by several hundreds of different G protein-coupled olfactory receptors (ORs). The main strategy in encoding odorant identities is a combinatorial receptor code scheme in that different odorants are recognized by different sets of ORs. Despite increasing information on agonist-OR combinations, little is known about the antagonism of ORs in the mammalian olfactory system. Here we show that odorants inhibit odorant responses of OR(s), evidence of antagonism between odorants at the receptor level. The antagonism was demonstrated in a heterologous OR-expression system and in single olfactory neurons that expressed a given OR, and was also visualized at the level of the olfactory epithelium. Dual functions of odorants as an agonist and an antagonist to ORs indicate a new aspect in the receptor code determination for odorant mixtures that often give rise to novel perceptual qualities that are not present in each component. The current study also provides insight into strategies to modulate perceived odorant quality.     

Ion transport across the frog olfactory mucosa: the action of cyclic nucleotides on the basal and odorant-stimulated states

The action of cyclic nucleotides on the short-circuit current across the isolated bullfrog olfactory mucosa was studied both in the absence and presence of odorants. 8-Bromo-cAMP applied to the ciliated side of the mucosa caused a concentration-dependent, reversible increase in the basal short-circuit current, but not when it was applied to the submucosal side. The current had a sigmoidal concentration dependence described by the Hill equation. The magnitude of the odorant-evoked current was enhanced after bathing the ciliated side with cAMP analogs or modulators of intracellular cAMP. GTP gamma S added to the ciliated side increased the odorant-evoked current, while GDP beta S caused a decrease. Current transients induced by stimulating the ciliated side with either pulses of odorant or 8-bromo-cAMP were partially suppressed by amiloride, but only when amiloride and stimulant were presented simultaneously. Pulses of 8-bromo-cAMP and odorant presented simultaneously resulted in currents that added nonlinearly. In the absence of odorant, 8-bromo-cGMP caused a concentration-dependent decrease in net inward current that was reversed by 8-bromo-cAMP. Odorant-evoked currents were also reduced by 8-bromo-cGMP, and these could not be reversed by 8-bromo-cAMP. The results indicate that one type of olfactory transduction process involves the activation by cAMP of an inward current through an amiloride-sensitive apical ion channel and that this mechanism is mediated by a stimulatory G-protein.     

Identification of second messenger mediating signal transduction in the olfactory receptor cell

One of the biggest controversial issues in the research of olfaction has been the mechanism underlying response generation to odorants that have been shown to fail to produce cAMP when tested by biochemical assays with olfactory ciliary preparations. Such observations are actually the original source proposing a possibility for the presence of multiple and parallel transduction pathways. In this study the activity of transduction channels in the olfactory cilia was recorded in cells that retained their abilities of responding to odorants that have been reported to produce InsP3 (instead of producing cAMP, and therefore tentatively termed "InsP3 odorants"). At the same time, the cytoplasmic cNMP concentration ([cNMP]i) was manipulated through the photolysis of caged compounds to examine their real-time interactions with odorant responses. Properties of responses induced by both InsP3 odorants and cytoplasmic cNMP resembled each other in their unique characteristics. Reversal potentials of currents were 2 mV for InsP3 odorant responses and 3 mV for responses induced by cNMP. Current and voltage (I-V) relations showed slight outward rectification. Both responses showed voltage-dependent adaptation when examined with double pulse protocols. When brief pulses of the InsP3 odorant and cytoplasmic cNMP were applied alternatively, responses expressed cross-adaptation with each other. Furthermore, both responses were additive in a manner as predicted quantitatively by the theory that signal transduction is mediated by the increase in cytoplasmic cAMP. With InsP3 odorants, actually, remarkable responses could be detected in a small fraction of cells ( approximately 2%), explaining the observation for a small production of cAMP in ciliary preparations obtained from the entire epithelium. The data will provide evidence showing that olfactory response generation and adaptation are regulated by a uniform mechanism for a wide variety of odorants.     

Protection of olfactory responses from inhibition by ethyl bromoacetate, diethylamine, and other chemically active odorants by certain esters and other compounds

Certain vaporous chemicals (chemically active odorants) arecapable of both stimulating olfactory responses and reactingwith receptors, ion channels, or receptor/ionophore macromoleculesto inhibit olfactory responses. We have studied the physiologicaleffects of several chemically active odorants using electrophysiologicaltechniques to record electroolfactogram (EOG) responses fromthe frog's olfactory mucosa. So far, the most studied agentsare ethyl bromoacetate (EBA), an alkylating agent, and diethylamine(DEA), a compound which is one of the strongest neutral organicbases. Certain odorants, or ‘protectants’, whenpresent before, during, and after exposure of the olfactorymucosa to either EBA or DEA have the property of maintainingolfactory responses which would otherwise be inhibited by exposureto the chemically active odorant alone. Protection from inhibitionby EBA is conferred by the presence of isoamyl acetate and afew closely-related esters, while protection from inhibitionby DEA is produced by the presence of p-dichlorobenzene. Protectionfrom inhibition by DEA is also achieved by lowering the pH ofthe olfactory mucosa through the simultaneous delivery of CO₂which produces carbonic acid. The mechanism of protection byesters and p-dichlorobenzene is unknown, but it seems likelythat these odorants somehow interfere with the access of thechemically active odorant to a site where it would normallyreact. ¹Present address: PSC Box 511, Peterson AFB, Colorado Springs,Colorado 80914, USA. ²Permanent address: Department of Chemistry, New Mexico Instituteof Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA.     

Identification of specific ligands for orphan olfactory receptors. G protein-dependent agonism and antagonism of odorants

Olfactory receptors are the largest group of orphan G protein-coupled receptors with an infinitely small number of agonists identified out of thousands of odorants. The de-orphaning of olfactory receptor (OR) is complicated by its combinatorial odorant coding and thus requires large scale odorant and receptor screening and establishing receptor-specific odorant profiles. Here, we report on the stable reconstitution of OR-specific signaling in HeLa/Olf cells via G protein alphaolf and adenylyl cyclase type-III to the Ca2+ influx-mediating olfactory cyclic nucleotide-gated CNGA2 channel. We demonstrate the central role of Galphaolf in odorant-specific signaling out of OR. The employment of the non-typical G protein alpha15 dramatically altered the odorant specificities of 3 of 7 receptors that had been characterized previously by different groups. We further show for two OR that an odorant may be an agonist or antagonist, depending on the G protein used. HeLa/Olf cells proved suitable for high-throughput screening in fluorescence-imaging plate reader experiments, resulting in the de-orphaning of two new OR for the odorant (-)citronellal from an expression library of 93 receptors. To demonstrate the G protein dependence of its odorant response pattern, we screened the most sensitive (-)citronellal receptor Olfr43 versus 94 odorants simultaneously in the presence of Galpha15 or Galphaolf. We finally established an EC50-ranking odorant profile for Olfr43 in HeLa/Olf cells. In summary, we conclude that, in heterologous systems, odorants may function as agonists or antagonists, depending on the G protein used. HeLa/Olf cells provide an olfactory model system for functional expression and de-orphaning of OR.     

The effect of flow rate upon the magnitude of the olfactory response differs for different odorants

There are discrepancies in the literature as to whether increasingsniff flow rate increases or decreases the magnitude of theolfactory response. Earlier work from this laboratory suggestedthat the size and sign of the effect of flow rate might dependupon how strongly the odorant presented sorbs to the mucosa.To pursue this possibility the summated multi-unit dischargeswere recorded from two sites on the olfactory nerve samplingwidely separated upstream and downstream regions along the flowpath of the bullfrog's olfactory mucosa. Artificially producedsniffs were presented at four flow rates for each of six odorantsrepresenting a wide range of mucosal sorption strengths. Theresults showed a distinct relationship between the effect offlow rate and the sorption strength of the odorant presented,going from a negative effect for the weakly sorted odorantsto highly positive effects for the strongly sorbed odorants.Furthermore, as expected if the flow rate effect depends uponsorption, the strongly sorbed odorants gave more positive flowrate effects as the mucosal surface over which their moleculesflowed increased. Apparently, then, the effect of flow rateon the magnitude of the olfactory response can range from negativeto markedly positive depending upon how strongly the odorantin question sorbs to the mucosa.     

Effects of air flow on rat electroolfactogram

The electroolfactogram (EOG) previously has been used to demonstrate the regional distribution of rat olfactory epithelial odorant responses. Here, we evaluated the effects of airflow parameters on EOGs in two preparations: one where odorants were directly applied to the epithelium (opened preparation) and one where odorants were drawn through the nasal passages by an artificial sniff (closed preparation). EOG rise times served as one measure of odorant access. For isoamyl acetate (but not for limonene), rise times were slower in the lateral recesses of the closed (but not the opened) preparation. Polar odorants (amyl acetate, carvone and benzaldehyde) evoked smaller responses in the closed preparation than in the opened preparation, and these responses were particularly depressed in the lateral regions of the closed preparation. Responses to nonpolar hydrocarbon odorants (limonene and benzene) were equal in the lateral regions of both preparations, but were somewhat depressed in the medial region of the closed preparation. The responses to some polar odorants in the closed preparation were sensitive to changes in airflow parameters. These data suggest that the sorptive properties of the nose contribute substantially to determining the response of the epithelium and act to increase differences produced by inherent receptor mechanisms.     

Evidence for a Chromatographic Model of Olfaction

The gradient of activity produced along the olfactory mucosa by odorant stimulation was measured by the ratio (the LB/MB ratio) of the summated neural discharges recorded from two branches of the olfactory nerve, a lateral branch (LB) supplying a mucosal region near the internal naris and a medial branch (MB) supplying a region near the external naris. Twenty-four frogs "sniffed" sixteen different odorants, each odorant at four concentrations and two flow rates. Increases in concentration and flow rate produced statistically reliable increases in the ratios; the magnitude of these increases was considerably smaller than the magnitude of the statistically significant changes that could be achieved by shifting the odorants themselves. Even the small change due to concentration depended upon the odorant presented. Thus, even at the highest physiologically possible concentrations and flow rates, the general level of the activity gradient along the mucosa appeared to be determined mainly by the particular odorant used. The relative retention time of each of these 16 different odorants was measured in a gas chromatograph fitted with a Carbowax 20M column. In general, the longer the odorant's retention time the smaller its LB/MB ratio. This suggests that the different mucosal gradients of activity are established for different odorants by a chromatographic process. The data further suggest that the mucosa behaves like a polar chromatographic column.     

Human olfactory receptor families and their odorants

The human nose detects volatile chemical stimuli by at least three different receptor families: odorant receptors, trace amine-associated receptors, and vomeronasal type-1 receptors. As G protein-coupled receptors, all of the few functionally characterized olfactory receptors share major functional features: when expressed in heterologous cell systems, they 1) respond to odorants of certain chemical groups, e.g., amines, aliphatic carboxylic acids or aldehydes, floral or fruity odorants, including certain key-food odorants, and putative pheromones, and 2) transduce their signals to intracellular cAMP signaling. However, little is known yet about specific differences in the functional designation of the three olfactory receptor families. Recently, two heterologous cell systems expressing olfactory signaling molecules have been developed. Different screening strategies will shed light on the yet sparsely available odorant specificity profiles and structure-function relationships of olfactory receptors, as well as the structure-activity relationships of their odorants.     

Physical Variables in the Olfactory Stimulation Process

Electrical recording from small twigs of nerve in a tortoise showed that olfactory, vomeronasal, and trigeminal receptors in the nose are responsive to various odorants. No one kind of receptor was most sensitive to all odorants. For controlled stimulation, odorant was caused to appear in a stream of gas already flowing through the nose. Of the parameters definable at the naris, temperature, relative humidity, and nature of inert gas had little effect on olfactory responses to amyl acetate, whereas odorant species, odorant concentration, and volume flow rate effectively determined the responses of all nasal chemoreceptors. An intrinsic variable of accessibility to the receptors, particularly olfactory, was demonstrated. Flow dependence of chemoreceptor responses is thought to reflect the necessity for delivery of odorant molecules to receptor sites. Since the olfactory receptors are relatively exposed, plateauing of the response with flow rate for slightly soluble odorants suggests an approach to concentration equilibrium in the overlying mucus with that in the air entering the naris. Accordingly, data for responses to amyl acetate were fitted with Beidler's (1954) taste equation for two kinds of sites being active. The requirement for finite aqueous solubility, if true, suggests substitution of aqueous solutions for gaseous solutions. A suitable medium was found and results conformed to expectations. Olfactory receptors were insensitive to variation of ionic strength, pH, and osmotic pressure.     

Numerical modeling of odorant uptake in the rat nasal cavity

An anatomically accurate 3-dimensional numerical model of the right rat nasal cavity was developed and used to compute low, medium, and high flow rate inspiratory and expiratory mucosal odorant uptake (imposed patterning) for 3 odorants with different mucus solubilities. The computed surface mass flux distributions were compared with anatomic receptor gene expression zones identified in the literature. In general, simulations predicted that odorants that were highly soluble in mucus were absorbed dorsally and medially, corresponding roughly to receptors from one of the gene expression zones. Insoluble odorants tended to be absorbed more peripherally in the rat olfactory region corresponding to the other 2 zones. These findings also agreed in general with the electroolfactogram measurements and the voltage-sensitive dye measurements reported in the literature. This numerical approach is the first to predict detailed odorant flux information across the olfactory mucosa in the rat nasal cavity during inspiratory and expiratory flow and to relate it to anatomic olfactory receptor location, physiological function, and biochemical experiment. This numerical technique can allow us to separate the contributions of imposed and inherent patterning mechanisms on the rat olfactory mucosa.     

Effects of electrical stimulation of the human olfactory mucosa

Electrical stimulation of the human olfactory mucosa was performed by means of an electrode attached to a rhinoscope . Stimulation of the nasal mucosa did not evoke smell sensations, but suppressed smell sensations of presented odorants. When electrical stimulation followed the exposure to an odorant within a certain interval, the stimulus recalled the already faded sensation of the preceding odorant. Electrical stimulation without prior natural stimulation produced unpleasant sensations in 3 patients with a history of temporal lobe seizures and olfactory auras , but not in patients with primary, generalized or focal epilepsy.     

Concanavalin A reveals olfactory receptors which discriminate between alkane odorants on the basis of size.

For certain odorants, the amplitude of the rat electro-olfactogram is reduced if the olfactory epithelium is treated with the lectin concanavalin A. When normal and cycloalkanes of one to ten carbon atoms are used as odorants at equimolar concentration, the maximum reduction in amplitude is found to correlate with the size of the stimulus molecule. This observation is consistent with the notion that concanavalin A disables an olfactory receptor molecule which normally responds to the alkyl moiety of odorants in a particular size range. That moiety may thus represent a 'primary' quality-determining component in odour discrimination.