Do hens suffer in battery cages? environmental preferences and welfare

The question ‘Do hens suffer in battery cages?’ is difficult to answer because of the problem of objectively assessing suffering in animals. It is argued that preference tests may be one way of throwing light on this difficult problem. This paper describes some experiments on habitat preference in domestic hens. No preference was observed between a commercial battery cage and a large pen when hens were given continuous access to the two. A simultaneous choice between a battery cage and an outside hen-run showed a clear preference for the run, but choice was strongly influenced by prior experience. The strength of the run preference was investigated by ‘pitting’ the run against food and access to companions.     

The effects of enriching laboratory cages using various physical structures on multiple measures of welfare in singly-housed rats

The single housing of laboratory rats may be recommended in some situations such as hypothesis-driven or test-specific studies, during electroencephalogram recording of phases of sleep and after surgical procedures. However, as single housing of laboratory rats has been shown to be stressful, modification of the housing environment is needed to improve the welfare of these animals. This experiment was carried out to investigate the long-term effects of environmental enrichment on some behavioural, physiological, pathological and psychological measures of welfare. With two batches of animals, 24 rats were housed singly in either enriched cages (EC) (n = 12 cages) or unenriched cages (UC) (n = 12 cages). Behaviour was sampled every week and so was body weight and weight gain over a six-week observation period. Behaviours of the rats in the elevated plus-maze were recorded on the seventh week, whereas organ weights were recorded postmortem. The results revealed that long-term single housing of rats in super-enriched cages increased levels of indicators of good welfare including sleep, exploration, movement and feeding behaviour, body weights, weight gains and the relative weights of the thymus gland and spleen, and decreased levels of indicators of poor welfare such as stationary behaviour and the relative weight of adrenal glands. Thus, enrichment of conventional cages of newly weaned singly-housed laboratory rats with multiple physical structures appeared to improve their ability to control the environment and to promote their species-specific behaviour; changes that can ultimately result in good welfare.     

A machine vision system to detect and count laying hens in battery cages

Manually counting hens in battery cages on large commercial poultry farms is a challenging task: time-consuming and often inaccurate. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a machine vision system that automatically counts the number of hens in battery cages. Automatically counting hens can help a regulatory agency or inspecting officer to estimate the number of living birds in a cage and, thus animal density, to ensure that they conform to government regulations or quality certification requirements. The test hen house was 87 m long, containing 37 battery cages stacked in 6-story high rows on both sides of the structure. Each cage housed 18 to 30 hens, for a total of approximately 11 000 laying hens. A feeder moves along the cages. A camera was installed on an arm connected to the feeder, which was specifically developed for this purpose. A wide-angle lens was used in order to frame an entire cage in the field of view. Detection and tracking algorithms were designed to detect hens in cages; the recorded videos were first processed using a convolutional neural network (CNN) object detection algorithm called Faster R-CNN, with an input of multi-angular view shifted images. After the initial detection, the hens’ relative location along the feeder was tracked and saved using a tracking algorithm. Information was added with every additional frame, as the camera arm moved along the cages. The algorithm count was compared with that made by a human observer (the ‘gold standard’). A validation dataset of about 2000 images achieved 89.6% accuracy at cage level, with a mean absolute error of 2.5 hens per cage. These results indicate that the model developed in this study is practicable for obtaining fairly good estimates of the number of laying hens in battery cages.     

A psychophysiological assessment battery

This research project was the first step in the development of a psychophysiological assessment battery. The battery consisted of eight tasks that have a history of use within the field of psychophysiology. These tasks were examined on a nonpathological, physically healthy sample. This sample was administered the assessment battery three times over the course of 16 weeks. The response systems of HR, SC, RR, TPA, and FPA were examined. Two major research questions were then examined. The first question was whether a subject would display a stable physiological profile on the assessment battery across the three administrations. The second question was whether there would be individual differences in physiological profiles on the assessment battery. These differences were examined in terms of individual response stereotypy (IRS) and stimulus response specificity (SRS). Depending on the task, from 30 to 100% of the subjects displayed stable physiological profiles across administrations. Twenty-five subjects displayed a high degree of SRS. Five subjects displayed a high degree of IRS.     

A psychophysiological assessment battery

This research project was the first step in the development of a psychophysiological assessment battery. The battery consisted of eight tasks that have a history of use within the field of psychophysiology. These tasks were examined on a nonpathological, physically healthy sample. This sample was administered the assessment battery three times over the course of 16 weeks. The response systems of HR, SC, RR, TPA, and FPA were examined. Two major research questions were then examined. The first question was whether a subject would display a stable physiological profile on the assessment battery across the three administrations. The second question was whether there would be individual differences in physiological profiles on the assessment battery. These differences were examined in terms of individual response stereotypy (IRS) and stimulus response specificity (SRS). Depending on the task, from 30 to 100% of the subjects displayed stable physiological profiles across administrations. Twenty-five subjects displayed a high degree of SRS. Five subjects displayed a high degree of IRS.     

A comparison of the behaviour and production of laying hens in experimental and conventional battery cages

There is some experimental evidence that the behaviour of laying hens in conventional battery cages is restricted. The absence of litter in particular may account in part for the higher level of feather pecking in cages as opposed to pens, and for the tendency of one strain to develop stereotyped pacing, indicative of frustration, in the pre-laying period.In the present small-scale study an experimental cage was tested for its effects on the behaviour, production, and feather and foot damage of groups of six birds per cage. The experimental cages, when compared with conventional types, had an horizontal floor, were extended in height, had food and water provided at two levels, two perches and nesting boxes containing litter. Egg collection was automated; eggs and litter travelled to a collecting point and the litter was recycled to the cages.Forty-eight birds of a White Leghorn laying strain (Shaver 288) were housed at six per cage in a bank of experimental cages. Forty-eight sister birds were grouped in sixes in conventional caging for comparison. Details are given of the space allowances in each cage on various criteria, since a simple floor area comparison was not relevant.Observations lasted over a 6-month period from point-of-lay. The experimentally caged birds laid nearly all their eggs in the nest boxes, and showed more movement, reflex activity, preening and sitting but less feeding, drinking, pecking, pushing and stereotyped behaviour. The specific variables causing these behavioural differences are speculated upon, although in this type of study they cannot be identified with certainty.The experimental birds showed less feather and foot damage compared with controls in conventional cages. Egg production in the two groups was similar but samples of eggs from the experimental cages were of a higher mean weight.As yet no economic assessment of the viability of the experimental cage has been undertaken, but reference is made to comparable studies where this has been attempted.On welfare grounds there is some evidence that the experimental cage is nearer to the criteria of an “ideal” cage (Hughes, 1973) than conventional cages.     

Headshaking in fowls: The effect of environmental stimuli

The incidence of headshaking in domestic fowls (Gallus domesticus) is influenced by both social and environmental factors; it was more frequent in larger groups and in subordinate birds, and it could be greatly increased by exposure to disturbing stimuli. The findings are not readily explained by earlier suggestions that it is a response to frustration of movement, that it serves to increase sensory input under conditions of social isolation in barren surroundings, or that it is a displacement reaction to conflict situations. Evidence is presented to show that it occurred in contexts demanding increased attention, for example, upon the presentation of novel or disturbing stimuli, and it is proposed that headshaking is an “alerting response”.     

Behaviour as a tool in the assessment of animal welfare

A central issue in animal welfare research is how to assess the welfare state of animals objectively and scientifically. I argue that this issue can be approached by asking two key questions: 1) is the animal physically healthy and 2) does the animal have what it wants? Behaviour is used to answer both of these questions. In the assessment of physical health, it can be used for clinical and pre-clinical diagnosis. In the assessment of what animals want, it has a major role through choice and preference testing. It is particularly important that applied ethologists develop methods for assessing welfare in situ--in the places where concern for animal welfare is greatest such as on farms and in zoos.     

Rapid animal welfare assessment: an archaeological approach

The welfare of an individual depends on its capacity to overcome suboptimal conditions in its environment; otherwise, its physical and psychological health becomes compromised. A situation that clearly indicates lack of control of the environment is the expression of abnormal behaviours, such as stereotypies. This study aimed to verify the well-being of police horses using a new rapid form of welfare assessment: an archaeological approach. To this end, we sampled and quantified marks found on the stables, deposited as a result of abnormal behaviour. We cross-referenced these physical marks with veterinary records of diseases, such as colic, known to be associated with stress. A total of 46 horses were sampled and the results showed a significant medium-strength, positive correlation between bite mark frequency on stable doors and the incidence of colic. A weak significant positive correlation was found between length of scratch marks (from pawing) and the incidence of lameness. We conclude that these marks reflect the accumulated expression of abnormal behaviour and can provide rapid insight into the welfare of individual animals.     

Inter-observer reliability of animal-based welfare indicators included in the Animal Welfare Indicators welfare assessment protocol for dairy goats

This study was conducted within the context of the Animal Welfare Indicators (AWIN) project and the underlying scientific motivation for the development of the study was the scarcity of data regarding inter-observer reliability (IOR) of welfare indicators, particularly given the importance of reliability as a further step for developing on-farm welfare assessment protocols. The objective of this study is therefore to evaluate IOR of animal-based indicators (at group and individual-level) of the AWIN welfare assessment protocol (prototype) for dairy goats. In the design of the study, two pairs of observers, one in Portugal and another in Italy, visited 10 farms each and applied the AWIN prototype protocol. Farms in both countries were visited between January and March 2014, and all the observers received the same training before the farm visits were initiated. Data collected during farm visits, and analysed in this study, include group-level and individual-level observations. The results of our study allow us to conclude that most of the group-level indicators presented the highest IOR level (‘substantial’, 0.85 to 0.99) in both field studies, pointing to a usable set of animal-based welfare indicators that were therefore included in the first level of the final AWIN welfare assessment protocol for dairy goats. Inter-observer reliability of individual-level indicators was lower, but the majority of them still reached ‘fair to good’ (0.41 to 0.75) and ‘excellent’ (0.76 to 1) levels. In the paper we explore reasons for the differences found in IOR between the group and individual-level indicators, including how the number of individual-level indicators to be assessed on each animal and the restraining method may have affected the results. Furthermore, we discuss the differences found in the IOR of individual-level indicators in both countries: the Portuguese pair of observers reached a higher level of IOR, when compared with the Italian observers. We argue how the reasons behind these differences may stem from the restraining method applied, or the different background and experience of the observers. Finally, the discussion of the results emphasizes the importance of considering that reliability is not an absolute attribute of an indicator, but derives from an interaction between the indicators, the observers and the situation in which the assessment is taking place. This highlights the importance of further considering the indicators’ reliability while developing welfare assessment protocols.     

The welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems: assessment of feeding and housing

Ninety-one farms were visited over a 2-year period to assess the welfare of growing pigs in five different production systems found either in France or in Spain using the Welfare Quality® protocol. This study focused on animal-based measures as indicators of ‘good feeding’ and ‘good housing’. Multiple Generalized Linear Mixed Models were performed for each measure to evaluate the differences between production systems and to detect possible causal factors. Pigs in the conventional system presented the lowest prevalence of poor body condition, whereas extensive Mallorcan Black pigs and extensive Iberian pigs were associated with a decreased prevalence of bursitis and pig dirtiness. The straw-bedded system presented a lower prevalence of bursitis, but poorer hygiene and more susceptibility of poor body condition than the conventional system. The age of the animals had a significant effect on the appearance of bursitis in the three intensive systems studied. The type of floor was a significant causal factor of bursitis and pig dirtiness in the conventional system and among intensive Iberian pigs. The feeding system was another causal factor of pig dirtiness on more than 50% of the body in the conventional system, whereas pig dirtiness on less than 50% of the body was influenced by the age of the animals. The prevalence of huddling animals in the conventional system was associated with the highest stocking densities and the lowest environmental temperatures. The results indicate that there were important differences between production systems based on animal-based indicators of the good feeding and housing principles. The recording of the age of the animals, type of floor, feeding system, stocking density and environmental temperature can be useful to predict the appearance of a given welfare measure of ‘good housing’ on a farm.     

Use of score sheets for welfare assessment of transgenic mice

The use of transgenic mice has increased dramatically in recent years and continues to increase further. However, because transgenesis may alter a balanced genotype and produce unpredictable effects, careful monitoring of health and welfare of the transgenic animal is advised. The present study assessed the feasibility of the use of score sheets for monitoring transgenic mice, as part of daily routine, in a transgenic unit. The score sheets used were based on parameters which are sensitive and easy to determine. The score sheets were used by two animal technicians and a thorough evaluation showed that the score sheets, as described in this paper, are useful for routine monitoring in a transgenic unit and may result in the early detection of animal welfare problems. However, notwithstanding the limited number of parameters included and the restricted age-span covered by the screening, the monitoring system was considered to be time consuming. Large-scale implementation of such a scoring system during the first weeks of life would increase daily care time by at least 15-20 min for an average litter of 4-6 pups. Nevertheless, the use of score sheets seems to be a prerequisite for monitoring the animal's welfare in the course of producing transgenic lines.     

Spatial organization in flocks of domestic fowls

The movements of individual birds within flocks were recorded by marking a sample with coloured tags and photographing the flock at fixed intervals using eight time-lapse cine, cameras, each camera covering a field amounting to one-eighth of the total area. The birds were housed on deep litter in an area 13·4×5·2 m, and flock sizes of four to 600 were used they ranged in age from 9 weeks to adult. The films were analysed, the positions of the marked birds were plotted and the probability of the observed distributions occurring by chance were calculated. Previous workers have found that individual birds move over, only part of the total area; in our study the movements of individuals lay on a continuum ranging from apparent randomness at one extreme to clear non-randomness at the other. Moreover, in all experiments most birds were sighted in most camera fields, indicating that their movements were incompatible with the accepted definition of a delineated home range. These results were explained by postulating strain differences in aggressiveness and assigning an important role to illumination level. At very low light levels individuals may be able to move freely in a flock because they cannot be recognized as strangers and, in any case, individual recognition may be exceptional in large flocks. Even so, birds did differ in the extent to which they moved around and some did exhibit preferences for particular parts of the pen; such tendencies were consistent over a 4-week period in adults but not in juveniles.     

Sequential sampling: a novel method in farm animal welfare assessment

Lameness in dairy cows is an important welfare issue. As part of a welfare assessment, herd level lameness prevalence can be estimated from scoring a sample of animals, where higher levels of accuracy are associated with larger sample sizes. As the financial cost is related to the number of cows sampled, smaller samples are preferred. Sequential sampling schemes have been used for informing decision making in clinical trials. Sequential sampling involves taking samples in stages, where sampling can stop early depending on the estimated lameness prevalence. When welfare assessment is used for a pass/fail decision, a similar approach could be applied to reduce the overall sample size. The sampling schemes proposed here apply the principles of sequential sampling within a diagnostic testing framework. This study develops three sequential sampling schemes of increasing complexity to classify 80 fully assessed UK dairy farms, each with known lameness prevalence. Using the Welfare Quality herd-size-based sampling scheme, the first ‘basic’ scheme involves two sampling events. At the first sampling event half the Welfare Quality sample size is drawn, and then depending on the outcome, sampling either stops or is continued and the same number of animals is sampled again. In the second ‘cautious’ scheme, an adaptation is made to ensure that correctly classifying a farm as ‘bad’ is done with greater certainty. The third scheme is the only scheme to go beyond lameness as a binary measure and investigates the potential for increasing accuracy by incorporating the number of severely lame cows into the decision. The three schemes are evaluated with respect to accuracy and average sample size by running 100 000 simulations for each scheme, and a comparison is made with the fixed size Welfare Quality herd-size-based sampling scheme. All three schemes performed almost as well as the fixed size scheme but with much smaller average sample sizes. For the third scheme, an overall association between lameness prevalence and the proportion of lame cows that were severely lame on a farm was found. However, as this association was found to not be consistent across all farms, the sampling scheme did not prove to be as useful as expected. The preferred scheme was therefore the ‘cautious’ scheme for which a sampling protocol has also been developed.     

The challenge of incorporating animal welfare in a social life cycle assessment model of European chicken production

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment - There is increasing public concern over standards of farm animal welfare, yet the majority of sustainability studies of livestock have thus far...