Effects of ambulance transport in critically ill patients.

Two groups of critically ill patients were transferred by ambulance from other hospitals to a central intensive therapy unit. The effect of transport was reviewed retrospectively in 46 patients and prospectively in 20 patients. Of the 46 patients reviewed retrospectively six became hypotensive, six became hypertensive, and seven developed delayed hypotension. One patient developed fits and six out of 13 patients had a rise in arterial PCO-2 of 1-6-4-1 kPa (12-31 mm Hg). Of the 20 patients reviewed prospectively, one patient became hypertensive due to overtransfusion, one had a fit, but none became hypotensive. Three out of four cases of delayed hypotension were related to starting intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Arterial PCO-2 fell in one patient and arterial PCO-2 rose in two, each change being related to changed oxygen therapy or narcotics. There were no changes in other cardiovascular or respiratory indices, body temperature, or urine production. Earlier transfer, resuscitation before transfer, continuing medical care during the journey, and hence a slower smoother journey seemed to be important factors in the management of these patients. Our findings, may have important implications in the future regional organization of the care of critically ill patients.     

Choice of fluids in critically ill patients

Background

Fluids are by far the most commonly administered intravenous treatment in patient care. During critical illness, fluids are widely administered to maintain or increase cardiac output, thereby relieving overt tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia.

Main text

Until recently, because of their excellent safety profile, fluids were not considered “medications”. However, it is now understood that intravenous fluid should be viewed as drugs. They affect the cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal and immune systems. Fluid administration should therefore always be accompanied by careful consideration of the risk/benefit ratio, not only of the additional volume being administered but also of the effect of its composition on the physiology of the patient. Apart from the need to constantly assess fluid responsiveness, it is also important to periodically reconsider the type of fluid being administered and the evidence regarding the relationship between specific disease states and different fluid solutions.

Conclusions

The current review presents the state of the art regarding fluid solutions and presents the existing evidence on routine fluid management of critically ill patients in specific clinical settings (sepsis, Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome, major abdominal surgery, acute kidney injury and trauma).

     

Decision making in critically ill patients with hematologic malignancy.

Hematologic neoplasms that were previously considered fatal are now potentially curable with techniques such as bone marrow transplantation. Such therapies also carry significant morbidity and mortality. With the increasing application of these therapies, a growing number of physicians are using medical decision making regarding critical care for these patients. The process by which ethical decisions are reached for these critically ill patients may be baffling because of several factors: rapidly evolving treatments, uncertain probabilities of the cure of the malignant disorder, the relatively young age of many of these patients, and the poor prognosis with critical illness. I discuss a process to reach acceptable decisions, providing a case example of the application of the process. This process is derived from the ethical principles that drive decision making in general medicine and attempts to maximize patients'' autonomy. It involves a consideration of accurate information regarding the disease process and the prognosis, a clear delineation of the goals of the medical care, and communication with patients. Appropriate, ethical, and consistent decisions regarding the critical care of patients with hematologic malignancy can be reached when these considerations are addressed.     

Correlation of blood rheology with vascular resistance in critically ill patients.

Blood rheologic measurements together with peripheral resistance determinations in vivo were made in 27 critically ill patients. Eighteen of these patients (group I) suffered from violent trauma or operative injury and the other 9 (group II) were patients with generalized sepsis. As a result of fluid therapy all patients underwent hemodilution, resulting in a decrease in blood viscosity. This drop in blood viscosity was counteracted to some extent by an increased plasma viscosity due to elevated fibrinogen levels and a decreased red cell deformability associated with massive transfusions of stored blood. The correlation of vivo hemodynamics with blood rheological data made it possible to separate the relative roles of vascular dimensions and blood viscosity in affecting the total peripheral resistance. This approach permitted us to distinguish varying degrees of vasoconstriction in nonseptic patients in low flow states (group I) and varying degrees of vasodilation in septic patients (group II). This type of analysis serves to elucidate the pathophysiology of hemodynamic alterations in disease and provides a rational basis for devising an effective therapeutic program.     

Validation of a prognostic score in critically ill patients undergoing transport.

Fifty consecutive critically ill patients transported between hospitals by a mobile intensive care team were assessed prospectively using a modification of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) sickness scoring system. Assessments were made before and after resuscitation, on return to base, and after 24 hours of intensive care. No patient died during transport. Twenty two patients died subsequently in hospital and 28 survived to return home. The mean score for the non-survivors before resuscitation was 21.7 and for the survivors 12.2 (p less than 0.0005). Among the non-survivors there was a significant fall in score with resuscitation but this did not alter their subsequent outcome. Neither group deteriorated during transport. The sickness score is a powerful method for determining prognosis, and employed longitudinally it may be useful in the assessment of treatment. It has important implications for the administration and organisation of regional intensive care services.