Macroevolution by transposition: drastic modification of DNA recognition by a type I restriction enzyme following Tn5 transposition.

We have characterized a novel mutant of EcoDXXI, a type IC DNA restriction and modification (R-M) system, in which the specificity has been altered due to a Tn5 insertion into the middle of hsdS, the gene which encodes the polypeptide that confers DNA sequence specificity to both the restriction and the modification reactions. Like other type I enzymes, the wild type EcoDXXI recognizes a sequence composed of two asymmetrical half sites separated by a spacer region: TCA(N7)RTTC. Purification of the EcoDXXI mutant methylase and subsequent in vitro DNA methylation assays identified the mutant recognition sequence as an interrupted palindrome, TCA(N8)TGA, in which the 5' half site of the wild type site is repeated in inverse orientation. The additional base pair in the non-specific spacer of the mutant recognition sequence maintains the proper spacing between the two methylatable adenine groups. Sequencing of both the wild type and mutant EcoDXXI hsdS genes showed that the Tn5 insertion occurred at nucleotide 673 of the 1221 bp gene. This effectively deletes the entire carboxyl-terminal DNA binding domain which recognizes the 3' half of the EcoDXXI binding site. The truncated hsdS gene still encodes both the amino-terminal DNA binding domain and the conserved repeated sequence that defines the length of the recognition site spacer region. We propose that the EcoDXXI mutant methylase utilizes two truncated hsdS subunits to recognize its binding site. The implications of this finding in terms of subunit interactions and the malleability of the type I R-M systems will be discussed.     

EcoA and EcoE: alternatives to the EcoK family of type I restriction and modification systems of Escherichia coli

The genes (hsd A) encoding EcoA, a restriction and modification system first identified in Escherichia coli 15T-, behave in genetic crosses as alleles of the genes (hsd K) encoding the archetypal type I restriction and modification system of E. coli K12. Nevertheless, molecular experiments have failed to detect relatedness between the A and K systems. We have cloned the hsd A genes and have identified, on the basis of DNA homology, related genes (hsd E) conferring a new specificity to a natural isolate of E. coli. We show that the overall organization of the genes encoding EcoA and EcoE closely parallels that for EcoK. Each enzyme is encoded by three genes, of which only one, hsdS, confers the specificity of DNA interaction. The three genes are in the same order as those encoding EcoK, i.e. hsdR, hsdM and hsdS and, similarly, they include a promoter between hsdR and hsdM from which the M and S genes can be transcribed. The evidence indicates that EcoA and EcoE are type I restriction and modification enzymes, but they appear to identify an alternative family to EcoK. For both families, the hsdR polypeptide is by far the largest, but the sizes of the other two polypeptides are reversed, with the smallest polypeptide of EcoK being the product of hsd S, and the smallest for the EcoA family being the product of hsdM. Physiologically, the A restriction and modification system differs from that of K and its relatives, in that A-specific methylation of unmodified DNA is particularly effective.     

A motif conserved among the type I restriction-modification enzymes and antirestriction proteins: a possible basis for mechanism of action of plasmid-encoded antirestriction functions.

Antirestriction proteins Ard encoded by some self-transmissible plasmids specifically inhibit restriction by members of all three families of type I restriction-modification (R-M) systems in E.coli. Recently, we have identified the amino acid region, 'antirestriction' domain, that is conserved within different plasmid and phage T7-encoded antirestriction proteins and may be involved in interaction with the type I R-M systems. In this paper we demonstrate that this amino acid sequence shares considerable similarity with a well-known conserved sequence (the Argos repeat) found in the DNA sequence specificity (S) polypeptides of type I systems. We suggest that the presence of these similar motifs in restriction and antirestriction proteins may give a structural basis for their interaction and that the antirestriction action of Ard proteins may be a result of the competition between the 'antirestriction' domains of Ard proteins and the similar conserved domains of the S subunits that are believed to play a role in the subunit assembly of type I R-M systems.     

The EcoR124 and EcoR124/3 restriction and modification systems: Cloning the genes

The Escherichia coli plasmid R124 codes for a type I restriction and modification system EcoR124 and carries genetic information, most probably in the form of a "silent copy," for the expression of a different R-M specificity R124/3. Characteristic DNA rearrangements have been shown to accompany the switch in specificity from R124 to R124/3 and vice versa. We have cloned a 14.2-kb HindIII fragment from R124 and shown that it contains the hsdR, hsdM, and hsdS genes which code for the EcoR124 R-M system. An equivalent fragment from the plasmid R124/3 following the switch in R-M specificity has also been cloned and shown to contain the genes coding for the EcoR124/3 R-M system. These fragments, however, lack a component present on the wild-type plasmid essential for the switch in specificity. Restriction fragment maps and preliminary heteroduplex analysis indicate the near identity of the genes that encode the two different DNA recognition specificities. Transposon mutagenesis was used to locate the positions of the hsdR, hsdM, and hsdS genes on the cloned fragments in conjunction with complementation tests for gene function. Indirect evidence indicates that hsdR is expressed from its own promoter and that hsdM and hsdS are expressed from a single promoter, unidirectionally.     

Characterization of a restriction modification system from the commensal <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis> strain A0 34/86 (O83:K24:H31)

Background  

Type I restriction-modification (R-M) systems are the most complex restriction enzymes discovered to date. Recent years have witnessed a renaissance of interest in R-M enzymes Type I. The massive ongoing sequencing programmes leading to discovery of, so far, more than 1 000 putative enzymes in a broad range of microorganisms including pathogenic bacteria, revealed that these enzymes are widely represented in nature. The aim of this study was characterisation of a putative R-M system EcoA0ORF42P identified in the commensal Escherichia coli A0 34/86 (O83: K24: H31) strain, which is efficiently used at Czech paediatric clinics for prophylaxis and treatment of nosocomial infections and diarrhoea of preterm and newborn infants.     

Sequence diversity among related genes for recognition of specific targets in DNA molecules

Escherichia coli strains K12 and B, and a new strain designated D, each encode a characteristic restriction and modification enzyme. These enzymes (EcoK, EcoB and presumably EcoD) comprise three subunits of which one, that encoded by the so-called specificity gene (hsdS), is responsible for recognition of the DNA sequence specific to that system. The other two subunits, encoded by hsdR and hsdM, are interchangeable between systems, and the available molecular evidence suggests that the hsdR and hsdM genes are highly conserved. The DNA sequence of a segment of the hsd region that includes the hsdS gene has been determined for each of the three strains. The hsdS gene varies in length from 1335 to 1425 base-pairs and the only regions showing obvious homology, one of about 100 base-pairs and a second of about 250 base-pairs, are highly conserved. The remainder of each hsd S gene shares little, or no, homology with either of the other related specificity genes. Thus, the specificity subunits, though components of a family of closely related enzymes with very similar functions, have remarkably dissimilar primary structure.     

Conservation of complex DNA recognition domains between families of restriction enzymes

One polypeptide, designated S, confers sequence-specificity to the multisubunit type I restriction enzymes. Two families of such enzymes, K and A, include members that recognize diverse, bipartite, target sequences. The S polypeptides of the K family, while having areas of near identity, also contain two extensive regions of variable sequence. We now show that one of these, comprising the N-terminal 150 amino acids, specifies recognition of one component of the bipartite target sequence. We have determined the sequence recognized by EcoE, a member of the A family. This sequence, 5'GAG(N7)ATGC, has the trinucleotide GAG in common with EcoA and with StySB of the K family. We determined the nucleotide sequences of the S genes of EcoA and EcoE, and compared their predicted amino acid sequences with each other and with those of the five members of the K family. There is no general sequence similarity between families, but the domain of the S polypeptide of StySB, which specifies GAG, shows nearly 50 per cent identity with the amino variable region of the S polypeptides of EcoA and EcoE. A complex domain that recognizes and directs methylation of GAG is therefore common to enzymes of generally dissimilar amino acid sequence.     

Novel type I restriction specificities through domain shuffling of HsdS subunits in Lactococcus lactis

This study identifies a natural system in Lactococcus lactis, in which a restriction modification specificity subunit resident on a 6159 bp plasmid (pAH33) alters the specificity of a functional R/M mechanism encoded by a 20.3 kb plasmid, pAH82. The new specificity was identified after phenotypic and molecular analysis of a 26.5 kb co-integrate plasmid (pAH90), which was detected after bacteriophage challenge of the parent strain. Analysis of the regions involved in the co-integration revealed that two novel hybrid hsdS genes had been formed during the co-integration event. The HsdS chimeras had interchanged the C- and N-terminal variable domains of the parent subunits, generating two new restriction specificities. Comparison of the parent hsdS genes with other type I specificity determinants revealed that the region of the hsdS genes responsible for the co-integration event is highly conserved among lactococcal type I hsdS determinants. Thus, as hsdS determinants are widespread in the genus Lactococcus, new restriction specificities may evolve rapidly after homologous recombination between these genes. This study demonstrates that, similar to previous observations in Gram-negative bacteria, a Gram-positive bacterium can acquire novel restriction specificities naturally through domain shuffling of resident HsdS subunits.     

Conservation of motifs within the unusually variable polypeptide sequences of type I restriction and modification enzymes

Type I restriction enzymes comprise three subunits encoded by genes designated hsdR, hsdM, and hsdS; S confers sequence specificity. Three families of enzymes are known and within families, but not between, hsdM and hsdR are conserved. Consequently, interfamily comparisons of M and R sequences focus on regions of putative functional significance, while both inter- and intrafamily comparisons address the origin, nature and role of diversity of type I restriction systems. We have determined the sequence of the hsdR gene for EcoA, thus making available sequences of all three hsd genes of one representative from each family. The predicted R polypeptide sequences share conserved regions with one superfamily of putative helicases, so-called ‘DEAD box’ proteins; these conserved sequences may be associated with the ATP-dependent translocation of DNA that precedes restriction. We also present hsdM and hsdR sequences for EcoE, a member of the same family as EcoA. The sequences of the M and R genes of EcoA and EcoE are at least as divergent as typical genes from Escherichia coli and Salmonella, perhaps as the result of selection favouring diversity of restriction specificities combined with lateral transfer among different species.     

Combinational variation of restriction modification specificities in Lactococcus lactis

Three genes coding for a type I R-M system related to the class C enzymes have been identified on the chromosome of Lactococcus lactis strain IL1403. In addition, plasmids were found that encode only the HsdS subunit that directs R-M specificity. The presence of these plasmids in IL1403 conferred a new R-M phenotype on the host, indicating that the plasmid-encoded HsdS is able to interact with the chromosomally encoded HsdR and HsdM subunits. Such combinational variation of type I R-M systems may facilitate the evolution of their specificity and thus reinforce bacterial resistance against invasive foreign unmethylated DNA.     

Two type I restriction enzymes from Salmonella species. Purification and DNA recognition sequences

We have purified the type I restriction enzymes SB and SP from Salmonella typhimurium and S. potsdam, respectively, and determined the DNA sequences that they recognize. These sequences resemble those previously determined for the type I enzymes, EcoB, EcoK and EcoA, in that the specific part of the sequence is divided into two domains by a spacer of non-specific sequence that has a fixed length for each enzyme. Two main differences from the previously determined sequences are seen. Both of the new sequences are degenerate and one of them, SB, has one trinucleotide and one pentanucleotide-specific domain rather than the trinucleotide and tetranucleotide domains seen for all of the other enzymes. The only conserved features of the recognition sequences are the adenosyl residues that are methylated in the modification reaction. For all of the enzymes these are situated ten or 11 base-pairs apart, one on each strand of the DNA. This suggests that the enzymes bind to DNA along one face of the double helix making protein-DNA interaction in two successive major grooves with most of the non-specific spacer sequence in the intervening minor groove.     

Reassortment of DNA recognition domains and the evolution of new specificities

Type I restriction enzymes comprise three subunits only one of which, the S polypeptide, dictates the specificity of the DNA sequence recognized. Recombination between two different hsdS genes, SP and SB, led to the isolation of a system, SQ, which had a different specificity from that of either parent. The finding that the nucleotide sequence recognized by SQ is a hybrid containing components from both the SP and SB target sequences suggested that DNA recognition is carried out by two separable domains within each specificity polypeptide. To test this we have made the recombinant gene of reciprocal structure and demonstrate that it encodes a polypeptide whose recognition sequence, deduced in vivo, is as predicted by this model. We also report the sequence of the SB specificity gene, so that information is now available for the five known members of this family of enzymes. All show a similar organization of conserved and variable regions. Comparisons of the predicted amino acid sequences reveal large non-conserved areas which may not even be structurally similar. This is remarkable since these different S subunits are functionally identical, except for the specificity with respect to the DNA sequence with which they interact. We discuss the correlation of the variation in polypeptide sequence with recognition specificities.     

Characterization of an<Emphasis Type="Italic">Eco</Emphasis>R 124I restriction-modification enzyme produced from a deleted form of the DNA-binding subunit,which results in a novel DNA specificity

We purified and characterized both the methyltransferase and the endonuclease containing the HsdS delta 50 subunit (type I restriction endonucleases are composed of three subunits--HsdR required for restriction, HsdM required for methylation and HsdS responsible for DNA recognition) produced from the deletion mutation hsdS delta 50 of the type IC R-M system EcoR 124I; this mutant subunit lacks the C-terminal 163 residues of HsdS and produces a novel DNA specificity. Analysis of the purified HsDs delta 50 subunit indicated that during purification it is subject to partial proteolysis resulting in removal of approximately 1 kDa of the polypeptide at the C-terminus. This proteolysis prevented the purification of further deletion mutants, which were determined as having a novel DNA specificity in vivo. After biochemical characterization of the mutant DNA methyltransferase (MTase) and restriction endonuclease we found only one difference comparing with the wild-type enzyme--a significantly higher binding affinity of the MTase for the two substrates of hemimethylated and fully methylated DNA. This indicates that MTase delta 50 is less able to discriminate the methylation status of the DNA during its binding. However, the mutant MTase still preferred hemimethylated DNA as the substrate for methylation. We fused the hsdM and hsdS delta 50 genes and showed that the HsdM-HsdS delta 50 fusion protein is capable of dimerization confirming the model for assembly of this deletion mutant.     

Distribution and diversity of hsd genes in Escherichia coli and other enteric bacteria.

We screened Salmonella typhimurium, Citrobacter freundii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Shigella boydii, and many isolates of Escherichia coli for DNA sequences homologous to those encoding each of two unrelated type I restriction and modification systems (EcoK and EcoA). Both K- and A-related hsd genes were identified, but never both in the same strain. S. typhimurium encodes three restriction and modification systems, but its DNA hybridized only to the K-specific probe which we know to identify the StySB system. No homology to either probe was detected in the majority of E. coli strains, but in C. freundii, we identified homology to the A-specific probe. We cloned this region of the C. freundii genome and showed that it encoded a functional, A-related restriction system whose specificity differs from those of known type I enzymes. Sequences immediately flanking the hsd K genes of E. coli K-12 and the hsd A genes of E. coli 15T- were shown to be homologous, indicating similar or even identical positions in their respective chromosomes. E. coli C has no known restriction system, and the organization of its chromosome is consistent with deletion of the three hsd genes and their neighbor, mcrB.     

New restriction enzymes discovered from Escherichia coli clinical strains using a plasmid transformation method

The presence of restriction enzymes in bacterial cells has been predicted by either classical phage restriction-modification (R-M) tests, direct in vitro enzyme assays or more recently from bacterial genome sequence analysis. We have applied phage R-M test principles to the transformation of plasmid DNA and established a plasmid R-M test. To validate this test, six plasmids that contain BamHI fragments of phage lambda DNA were constructed and transformed into Escherichia coli strains containing known R-M systems including: type I (EcoBI, EcoAI, Eco124I), type II (HindIII) and type III (EcoP1I). Plasmid DNA with a single recognition site showed a reduction of relative efficiency of transformation (EOT = 10(-1)-10(-2)). When multiple recognition sites were present, greater reductions in EOT values were observed. Once established in the cell, the plasmids were subjected to modification (EOT = 1.0). We applied this test to screen E.coli clinical strains and detected the presence of restriction enzymes in 93% (14/15) of cells. Using additional subclones and the computer program, RM Search, we identified four new restriction enzymes, Eco377I, Eco585I, Eco646I and Eco777I, along with their recognition sequences, GGA(8N)ATGC, GCC(6N)TGCG, CCA(7N)CTTC, and GGA(6N)TATC, respectively. Eco1158I, an isoschizomer of EcoBI, was also found in this study.     

Recombination of constant and variable modules alters DNA sequence recognition by type IC restriction-modification enzymes.

EcoR124 and EcoDXXI are allelic type I restriction-modification (R-M) systems whose specificity genes consist of common structural elements: two variable regions are separated by a constant, homologous region containing a number of repetitive sequence elements. In vitro recombination of variable and constant elements has led to fully active, hybrid R-M systems exhibiting new and predictable target site specificities. Methylation of synthetic DNA sequences with purified, hybrid modification methylases was used to confirm the proposed recognition sequences. The results clearly demonstrate the correlation between protein domains and target site specificity. Our data suggest that a bacterial population may switch the recognition sequences of its type I R-M system by single recombination events and thus is able to maintain a prokaryotic analogue of the immune system of variable specificity.     

Deletion of one nucleotide within the homonucleotide tract present in the hsdS gene alters the DNA sequence specificity of type I restriction-modification system NgoAV

As a result of a frameshift mutation, the hsdS locus of the NgoAV type IC restriction and modification (RM) system comprises two genes, hsdS(NgoAV1) and hsdS(NgoAV2). The specificity subunit, HsdS(NgoAV), the product of the hsdS(NgoAV1) gene, is a naturally truncated form of an archetypal specificity subunit (208 N-terminal amino acids instead of 410). The presence of a homonucleotide tract of seven guanines (poly[G]) at the 3' end of the hsdS(NgoAV1) gene makes the NgoAV system a strong candidate for phase variation, i.e., stochastic addition or reduction in the guanine number. We have constructed mutants with 6 guanines instead of 7 and demonstrated that the deletion of a single nucleotide within the 3' end of the hsdS(NgoAV1) gene restored the fusion between the hsdS(NgoAV1) and hsdS(NgoAV2) genes. We have demonstrated that such a contraction of the homonucleotide tract may occur in vivo: in a Neisseria gonorrhoeae population, a minor subpopulation of cells appeared to have only 6 guanines at the 3' end of the hsdS(NgoAV1) gene. Escherichia coli cells carrying the fused gene and expressing the NgoAVΔ RM system were able to restrict λ phage at a level comparable to that for the wild-type NgoAV system. NgoAV recognizes the quasipalindromic interrupted sequence 5'-GCA(N(8))TGC-3' and methylates both strands. NgoAVΔ recognizes DNA sequences 5'-GCA(N(7))GTCA-3' and 5'-GCA(N(7))CTCA-3', although the latter sequence is methylated only on the complementary strand within the 5'-CTCA-3' region of the second recognition target sequence.     

Basis for changes in DNA recognition by the EcoR124 and EcoR124/3 type I DNA restriction and modification enzymes

EcoR124 and EcoR124/3 are type I DNA restriction and modification systems. The EcoR124/3 system arose from the EcoR124 system some 15 years ago and at the electron microscopic DNA heteroduplex level the genes for both systems are still apparently identical. We have shown that the DNA sequences recognized by the two systems are GAA(N6)RTCG for EcoR124 and GAA(N7)RTCG for EcoR124/3. The sequences thus differ only in the length of the non-specific spacer. This difference nevertheless places the two specific domains of the EcoR124/3 recognition sequence 0.34 nm further apart and rotates them 36 degrees with respect to those of EcoR124, which implies major structural differences in the proteins recognizing these sequences. We have now determined the nucleotide sequences of the hsdS and hsdM genes of both systems and of the hsdR gene of EcoR124/3. The hsdS gene products provide DNA sequence specificity in both restriction and modification, the hsdM gene products are necessary for modification and all three hsd gene products are required for restriction. The only difference that we have detected between the two systems is that a 12 base-pair sequence towards the middle of the hsdS gene is repeated twice in the EcoR124 gene and three times in the EcoR124/3 gene. We have deleted one of the repeats in the EcoR124/3 gene and shown that this changes the specificity to that of EcoR124. Thus, the extra four amino acids in the middle of the EcoR124/3 hsdS gene product, which in an alpha-helical configuration would extend 0.6 nm, are sufficient to explain the differences in sequence recognition. We suggest that the EcoR124/3 system was generated by an unequal crossing over and argue that this kind of specificity change should not be rare in Nature.