IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY OF FERTILIZATION AND PARTHENOGENESIS IN LAMINARIA ANGUSTATA (PHAEOPHYTA)1

Normal fertilization and parthenogenesis of unfertilized eggs were observed in Laminaria angustata Kjellman by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy using a tubulin antibody. Sperm aster formation did not occur at plasmogamy. The centrosome of the egg gradually disappeared. Shortly after karyogamy, one centrosome reappeared near the zygote nucleus. During mitosis, the centrosome replicated and the daughter centrosomes migrated to opposite poles. The mitotic spindle was formed by microtubules that elongated from both poles. After the first cell division, each of the daughter cells received one centrosome that persisted throughout the development of the sporophyte. During parthenogenetic development, abnormal mono-, tri-, and multi-polar spindles were formed. These abnormal spindles caused abnormal nuclear and cytoplasmic division. Thus, cells were produced with 1) no nuclei, 2) multiple nuclei, 3) irregular numbers of chromosomes, and/or 4) no centrosomes. This is one of the reasons for the abortion and abnormal morphogenesis during parthenogenesis. Ultrastructural observations showed that, although cells of some parthogenetic sporophytes have centrioles, cells of almost all abnormally shaped parthenogenetic sporophytes lack centrioles. These results suggest that centrioles are required for normal centrosomal functions in Laminaria. Although centrioles are inherited paternally, some centrosomal material appears to be present or produced de novo in unfertilized eggs.     

Structural and functional effects of hydrostatic pressure on centrosomes from vertebrate cells

In an attempt to better understand the role of centrioles in vertebrate centrosomes, hydrostatic pressure was applied to isolated centrosomes as a means to disassemble centriole microtubules. Treatments of the centrosomes were monitored by analyzing their protein composition, ultrastructure, their ability to nucleate microtubules from pure tubulin, and their capability to induce parthenogenetic development of Xenopus eggs. Moderate hydrostatic pressure (95 MPa) already affected the organization of centriole microtubules in isolated centrosomes, and also impaired microtubule nucleation. At higher pressure, the protein composition of the peri-centriolar matrix (PCM) was also altered and the capacity to nucleate microtubules severely impaired. Incubation of the treated centrosomes in Xenopus egg extract could restore their capacity to nucleate microtubules after treatment at 95 MPa, but not after higher pressure treatment. However, the centriole structure was in no case restored. It is noteworthy that centrosomes treated with mild pressure did not allow parthenogenetic development after injection into Xenopus eggs, even if they had recovered their capacity to nucleate microtubules. This suggested that, in agreement with previous results, centrosomes in which centriole architecture is impaired, could not direct the biogenesis of new centrioles in Xenopus eggs. Centriole structure could also be affected by applying mild hydrostatic pressure directly to living cells. Comparison of the effect of hydrostatic pressure on cells at the G1/S border or on the corresponding cytoplasts suggests that pro-centrioles are very sensitive to pressure. However, cells can regrow a centriole after pressure-induced disassembly. In that case, centrosomes eventually recover an apparently normal duplication cycle although with some delay.     

Reproductive maternal centrosomes are cast off into polar bodies during maturation division in starfish oocytes

Animal egg inherits a maternal centrosome from the meiosis-II spindle and sperm can introduce another centrosome at fertilization. It has been believed that in most animals only the sperm centrosome provides the division poles for mitosis in zygotes. This uniparental (paternal) inheritance of the centrosome must depend on the loss of the maternal centrosome. In starfish, suppression of polar body (PB) extrusion is a prerequisite for induction of parthenogenesis (Washitani-Nemoto et al. (1994) Dev. Biol. 163, 293-301), suggesting that the centrosomes cast off into PBs have reproducing capacity. Due to the absence of centriole duplication in meiosis II of starfish oocytes, each centrosome of a meiosis-II spindle has only one single centriole, whereas in meiosis I each has a pair of centrioles (Sluder et al. (1989) Dev. Biol. 131, 567-579; Kato et al. (1990) Dev. Growth Differ. 32, 41-49). Hence, the first PB (PB1) has two centrioles, whereas the second PB (PB2) and the mature egg have only one centriole, respectively. The present study examined the reproductive capacity of PB centrosomes by transplanting them into artificially activated eggs, and then the recipient egg nucleus with the surrounding cytoplasm was removed. A transplanted PB2 centrosome with a single centriole formed a monopolar spindle at the first mitosis, followed by formation of a bipolar spindle in the next mitosis, leading to actual cleavage and subsequent development. This proves the reproducing capacity of the single centriole in the PB2 centrosome. The behavior of the transplanted PB1 centrosome was exactly the same as in the PB2 centrosome, in spite of the difference in the number of centrioles. These results clearly show that four maternal centrioles are heterogeneous in duplicating capacity, during meiosis only one centriole in each of the centrosomes of a meiosis-I spindle pole retains duplicating capacity, the reproductive centrioles are successively cast off into PBs, and finally a mature egg inheriting a nonreproductive centriole alone is formed, and the presence of a single reproductive centriole is sufficient condition for embryonic development in starfish.     

Drosophila centrosomes are unable to trigger parthenogenetic development of Xenopus eggs

Centrosomes are powerful and exclusive parthenogenetic agents in the Xenopus egg. We have previously shown that heterologous centrosomes from various vertebrate species were able to promote egg cleavage in Xenopus and that human centrosome activity was associated with an insoluble proteinacious structure that is not significantly simpler than the native centrosome. In this work, we have investigated the parthenogenetic capacity of more evolutionary distant centrosomes. We show that centrosomes devoid of centrioles, such as SPBs isolated from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, do not form asters of microtubules in cytoplasmic extracts from Xenopus eggs, and are inactive in the parthenogenetic test. We further show that Drosophila centrosomes which possess a typical centriole architecture, and are quite active to nucleate microtubules in Xenopus cytoplasmic extracts, are unable to trigger egg cleavage. This was observed both with centrosomes isolated from Drosophila syncytial embryos and nucleus-centrosome complexes from the Drosophila Kc23 cell line. We demonstrate that this inability could not be restored after pre-incubation of Drosophila centrosomes in the egg cytoplasm before injection. We conclude that the parthenogenetic activity of a centrosome is not directly linked to its capacity to nucleate microtubules from the egg tubulin, and that the evolutionary conserved nine-fold symmetrical structure of the centriole cannot be considered as sufficient for triggering procentriole assembly.     

Parthenogenesis in non-rodent species: developmental competence and differentiation plasticity

An oocyte can activate its developmental process without the intervention of the male counterpart. This form of reproduction, known as parthenogenesis, occurs spontaneously in a variety of lower organisms, but not in mammals. However, it must be noted that mammalian oocytes can be activated in vitro, mimicking the intracellular calcium wave induced by the spermatozoon at fertilization, which triggers cleavage divisions and embryonic development. The resultant parthenotes are not capable of developing to term and arrest their growth at different stages, depending on the species. It is believed that this arrest is due to genomic imprinting, which causes the repression of genes normally expressed by the paternal allele. Human parthenogenetic embryos have recently been proposed as an alternative, less controversial source of embryonic stem cell lines, based on their inherent inability to form a new individual. However many aspects related to the biology of parthenogenetic embryos and parthenogenetically derived cell lines still need to be elucidated. Limited information is available in particular on the consequences of the lack of centrioles and on the parthenote's ability to assemble a new embryonic centrosome in the absence of the sperm centriole. Indeed, in lower species, successful parthenogenesis largely depends upon the oocyte's ability to regenerate complete and functional centrosomes in the absence of the material supplied by a male gamete, while the control of this event appears to be less stringent in mammalian cells. In an attempt to better elucidate some of these aspects, parthenogenetic cell lines, recently derived in our laboratory, have been characterized for their pluripotency. In vitro and in vivo differentiation plasticity have been assessed, demonstrating the ability of these cells to differentiate into cell types derived from the three germ layers. These results confirmed common features between uni- and bi-parental embryonic stem cells. However data obtained with parthenogenetic cells indicate the presence of an intrinsic deregulation of the mechanisms controlling proliferation vs. differentiation and suggest their uni-parental origin as a possible cause.     

Centrosome inheritance in the parthenogenetic egg of the collembolan Folsomia candida

Unfertilized eggs commonly lack centrioles, which are usually provided by the male gamete at fertilization, and are unable to assemble functional reproducing centrosomes. However, some insect species lay eggs that develop to adulthood without a contribution from sperm. We report that the oocyte of the parthenogenetic collembolan Folsomia candida is able to self-assemble microtubule-based asters in the absence of pre-existing maternal centrosomes. The asters, which develop near the innermost pole of the meiotic apparatus, interact with the female chromatin to form the first mitotic spindle. The appearance of microtubule-based asters in the cytoplasm of the activated Folsomia oocyte might represent a conserved mechanism for centrosome formation during insect parthenogenesis. We also report that the architecture of the female meiotic apparatus and the structure of the mitotic spindles during the early embryonic divisions are unusual in comparison with that of insects.This work was made possible by grants from PAR (University of Siena) and PRIN to G.C.     

Centrosome reduction during gametogenesis and its significance

Animal spermatids and primary oocytes initially have typical centrosomes comprising pairs of centrioles and pericentriolar fibrous centrosomal proteins. These somatic cell-like centrosomes are partially or completely degenerated during gametogenesis. Centrosome reduction during spermiogenesis comprises attenuation of microtubule nucleation function, loss of pericentriolar material, and centriole degeneration. Centrosome reduction during oogenesis is due to complete degeneration of centrioles, which leads to dispersal of the pericentriolar centrosomal proteins, loss of replicating capacity of the spindle poles, and switching to acentrosomal mode of spindle organization. Oocyte centrosome reduction plays an important role in preventing parthenogenetic embryogenesis and balancing centrosome number in the embryonic cells.     

The de novo centriole assembly pathway in HeLa cells: cell cycle progression and centriole assembly/maturation

It has been reported that nontransformed mammalian cells become arrested during G1 in the absence of centrioles (Hinchcliffe, E., F. Miller, M. Cham, A. Khodjakov, and G. Sluder. 2001. Science. 291:1547-1550). Here, we show that removal of resident centrioles (by laser ablation or needle microsurgery) does not impede cell cycle progression in HeLa cells. HeLa cells born without centrosomes, later, assemble a variable number of centrioles de novo. Centriole assembly begins with the formation of small centrin aggregates that appear during the S phase. These, initially amorphous "precentrioles" become morphologically recognizable centrioles before mitosis. De novo-assembled centrioles mature (i.e., gain abilities to organize microtubules and replicate) in the next cell cycle. This maturation is not simply a time-dependent phenomenon, because de novo-formed centrioles do not mature if they are assembled in S phase-arrested cells. By selectively ablating only one centriole at a time, we find that the presence of a single centriole inhibits the assembly of additional centrioles, indicating that centrioles have an activity that suppresses the de novo pathway.     

Nonequivalence of maternal centrosomes/centrioles in starfish oocytes: selective casting-off of reproductive centrioles into polar bodies

It is believed that in most animals only the paternal centrosome provides the division poles for mitosis in zygotes. This paternal inheritance of the centrosomes depends on the selective loss of the maternal centrosome. In order to understand the mechanism of centrosome inheritance, the behavior of all maternal centrosomes/centrioles was investigated throughout the meiotic and mitotic cycles by using starfish eggs that had polar body (PB) formation suppressed. In starfish oocytes, the centrioles do not duplicate during meiosis II. Hence, each centrosome of the meiosis II spindle has only one centriole, whereas in meiosis I, each has a pair of centrioles. When two pairs of meiosis I centrioles were retained in the cytoplasm of oocytes by complete suppression of PB extrusion, they separated into four single centrioles in meiosis II. However, after completion of the meiotic process, only two of the four single centrioles were found in addition to the pronucleus. When the two single centrioles of a meiosis II spindle were retained in the oocyte cytoplasm by suppressing the extrusion of the second PB, only one centriole was found with the pronucleus after the completion of the meiotic process. When these PB-suppressed eggs were artificially activated to drive the mitotic cycles, all the surviving single centrioles duplicated repeatedly to form pairs of centrioles, which could organize mitotic spindles. These results indicate that the maternal centrioles are not equivalent in their intrinsic stability and reproductive capacity. The centrosomes with the reproductive centrioles are selectively cast off into the PBs, resulting in the mature egg inheriting a nonreproductive centriole, which would degrade shortly after the completion of meiosis.     

Daughter centrioles assemble preferentially towards the nuclear envelope in Drosophila syncytial embryos

Centrosomes are important organizers of microtubules within animal cells. They comprise a pair of centrioles surrounded by the pericentriolar material, which nucleates and organizes the microtubules. To maintain centrosome numbers, centrioles must duplicate once and only once per cell cycle. During S-phase, a single new ‘daughter’ centriole is built orthogonally on one side of each radially symmetric ‘mother’ centriole. Mis-regulation of duplication can result in the simultaneous formation of multiple daughter centrioles around a single mother centriole, leading to centrosome amplification, a hallmark of cancer. It remains unclear how a single duplication site is established. It also remains unknown whether this site is pre-defined or randomly positioned around the mother centriole. Here, we show that within Drosophila syncytial embryos daughter centrioles preferentially assemble on the side of the mother facing the nuclear envelope, to which the centrosomes are closely attached. This positional preference is established early during duplication and remains stable throughout daughter centriole assembly, but is lost in centrosomes forced to lose their connection to the nuclear envelope. This shows that non-centrosomal cues influence centriole duplication and raises the possibility that these external cues could help establish a single duplication site.     

Plk4 triggers autonomous de novo centriole biogenesis and maturation

Centrioles form centrosomes and cilia. In most proliferating cells, centrioles assemble through canonical duplication, which is spatially, temporally, and numerically regulated by the cell cycle and the presence of mature centrioles. However, in certain cell types, centrioles assemble de novo, yet by poorly understood mechanisms. Herein, we established a controlled system to investigate de novo centriole biogenesis, using Drosophila melanogaster egg explants overexpressing Polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4), a trigger for centriole biogenesis. We show that at a high Plk4 concentration, centrioles form de novo, mature, and duplicate, independently of cell cycle progression and of the presence of other centrioles. Plk4 concentration determines the temporal onset of centriole assembly. Moreover, our results suggest that distinct biochemical kinetics regulate de novo and canonical biogenesis. Finally, we investigated which other factors modulate de novo centriole assembly and found that proteins of the pericentriolar material (PCM), and in particular γ-tubulin, promote biogenesis, likely by locally concentrating critical components.     

Polo-Like Kinase 2-Dependent Phosphorylation of NPM/B23 on Serine 4 Triggers Centriole Duplication

Duplication of the centrosome is well controlled during faithful cell division while deregulation of this process leads to supernumary centrosomes, chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy, a hallmark of many cancer cells. We previously reported that Polo-like kinase 2 (Plk2) is activated near the G1/S phase transition, and regulates the reproduction of centrosomes. In search for Plk2 interacting proteins we have identified NPM/B23 (Nucleophosmin) as a novel Plk2 binding partner. We find that Plk2 and NPM/B23 interact in vitro in a Polo-box dependent manner. An association between both proteins was also observed in vivo. Moreover, we show that Plk2 phosphorylates NPM/B23 on serine 4 in vivo in S-phase. Notably, expression of a non-phosphorylatable NPM/B23 S4A mutant interferes with centriole reduplication in S-phase arrested cells and leads to a dilution of centriole numbers in unperturbed U2OS cells. The corresponding phospho-mimicking mutants have the opposite effect and their expression leads to the accumulation of centrioles. These findings suggest that NPM/B23 is a direct target of Plk2 in the regulation of centriole duplication and that phosphorylation on serine 4 can trigger this process.     

Centriole inheritance

Early cell biologists perceived centrosomes to be permanent cellular structures. Centrosomes were observed to reproduce once each cycle and to orchestrate assembly a transient mitotic apparatus that segregated chromosomes and a centrosome to each daughter at the completion of cell division. Centrosomes are composed of a pair of centrioles buried in a complex pericentriolar matrix. The bulk of microtubules in cells lie with one end buried in the pericentriolar matrix and the other extending outward into the cytoplasm. Centrioles recruit and organize pericentriolar material. As a result, centrioles dominate microtubule organization and spindle assembly in cells born with centrosomes. Centrioles duplicate in concert with chromosomes during the cell cycle. At the onset of mitosis, sibling centrosomes separate and establish a bipolar spindle that partitions a set of chromosomes and a centrosome to each daughter cell at the completion of mitosis and cell division. Centriole inheritance has historically been ascribed to a template mechanism in which the parental centriole contributed to, if not directed, assembly of a single new centriole once each cell cycle. It is now clear that neither centrioles nor centrosomes are essential to cell proliferation. This review examines the recent literature on inheritance of centrioles in animal cells.Key words: centrosome, centriol, spindle, mitosis, microtubule, cell cycle, checkpoints     

The Origin of the Second Centriole in the Zygote of Drosophila melanogaster

Centrosomes are composed of two centrioles surrounded by pericentriolar material (PCM). However, the sperm and the oocyte modify or lose their centrosomes. Consequently, how the zygote establishes its first centrosome, and in particular, the origin of the second zygotic centriole, is uncertain. Drosophila melanogaster spermatids contain a single centriole called the Giant Centriole (GC) and a Proximal centriole-like (PCL) structure whose function is unknown. We found that, like the centriole, the PCL loses its protein markers at the end of spermiogenesis. After fertilization, the first two centrioles are observed via the recruitment of the zygotic PCM proteins and are seen in asterless mutant embryos that cannot form centrioles. The zygote’s centriolar proteins label only the daughter centrioles of the first two centrioles. These observations demonstrate that the PCL is the origin for the second centriole in the Drosophila zygote and that a paternal centriole precursor, without centriolar proteins, is transmitted to the egg during fertilization.     

The number of centrioles in insect sperm: a study in two kinds of differentiating silkworm spermatids

The typical eupyrene and atypical apyrene cycles of sperm differentiation in Bombyx mori were studied, with special attention to centriole number and behavior. Contrary to other reports, there is always only one centriole in the differentiating and in the mature sperm, thus confirming our previous findings that insect sperm has one centriole at the base of the flagellum, in contrast to two centrioles found in many other groups of animals. This numerical difference is discussed in an evolutionary context.     

Centrin-2 is required for centriole duplication in mammalian cells

BACKGROUND: Centrosomes are the favored microtubule-organizing framework of eukaryotic cells. Centrosomes contain a pair of centrioles that normally duplicate once during the cell cycle to give rise to two mitotic spindle poles, each containing one old and one new centriole. However, aside from their role as an anchor point for pericentriolar material and as basal bodies of flagella and cilia, the functional attributes of centrioles remain enigmatic. RESULTS: Here, using RNA interference, we demonstrate that "knockdown" of centrin-2, a protein of centrioles, results in failure of centriole duplication during the cell cycle in HeLa cells. Following inhibition of centrin-2 synthesis, the preexisting pair of centrioles separate, and functional bipolar spindles form with only one centriole at each spindle pole. Centriole dilution results from the ensuing cell division, and daughter cells are "born" with only a single centriole. Remarkably, these unicentriolar daughter cells may complete a second and even third bipolar mitosis in which spindle microtubules converge onto unusually broad spindle poles and in which cell division results in daughter cells containing either one or no centrioles at all. Cells thus denuded of the mature or both centrioles fail to undergo cytokinesis in subsequent cell cycles, give rise to multinucleate products, and finally die. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate a requirement for centrin in centriole duplication and demonstrate that centrioles play a role in organizing spindle pole morphology and in the completion of cytokinesis.     

Parthenogenesis in mammals: pros and cons in pluripotent cell derivation

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) represent a useful tool for cell therapy studies, however the use of embryos for their derivation give rise to ethical, religious and legal problems when applied to the human. During the last years parthenogenesis has been proposed as an alternative source to obtain ESCs. Based on the fact that parthenotes avoid many concerns surrounding the “ad hoc” in vitro production and following destruction of viable human embryos. Unfortunately many aspects related to parthenogenetic cell biology are not fully understood and still need to be elucidated. In this review we describe advantages and limits of these cells. We discuss their typical ESC morphology and high telomerase activity, which disappears after differentiation. We examine the pluripotency signature that they share with bi-parental ESCs. We review their high differentiation plasticity that allow for the derivation of several mature cell type populations when we expose these cells to adequate conditions. On the other hand, in-depth analysis demonstrated chromosome mal-segregation and altered mechanisms controlling centriole arrangement and mitotic spindle formation in these cells. We hypothesize their monoparental origin as one of the possible cause of these anomalies and suggest a great caution if a therapeutic use is considered.     

Aster self-organization at meiosis: a conserved mechanism in insect parthenogenesis?

Unfertilized eggs usually lack maternal centrosomes and cannot develop without sperm contribution. However, several insect species lay eggs that develop to adulthood as unfertilized in the absence of a preexisting centrosome. We report that the oocyte of the parthenogenetic viviparous pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum is able to self-organize microtubule-based asters, which in turn interact with the female chromatin to form the first mitotic spindle. This mode of reproduction provides a good system to investigate how the oocyte can assemble new centrosomes and how their number can be exactly monitored. We propose that the cooperative interaction of motor proteins and randomly nucleated surface microtubules could lead to the formation of aster-like structures in the absence of pre-existing centrosomes. Recruitment of material along the microtubules might contribute to the accumulation of pericentriolar material and centriole precursors at the focus of the asters, thus leading to the formation of true centrosomes. The appearance of microtubule asters at the surface of activated oocytes could represent a possible common mechanism for centrosome formation during insect parthenogenesis.     

Centrioles in the cell cycle. I. Epithelial cells

A study was made of the structure of the centrosome in the cell cycle in a nonsynchronous culture of pig kidney embryo (PE) cells. In the spindle pole of the metaphase cell there are two mutually perpendicular centrioles (mother and daughter) which differ in their ultrastructure. An electron-dense halo, which surrounds only the mother centriole and is the site where spindle microtubules converge, disappears at the end of telophase. In metaphase and anaphase, the mother centriole is situated perpendicular to the spindle axis. At the beginning of the G1 period, pericentriolar satellites are formed on the mother centriole with microtubules attached to them; the two centrioles diverge. The structures of the two centrioles differ throughout interphase; the mother centriole has appendages, the daughter does not. Replication of the centrioles occurs approximately in the middle of the S period. The structure of the procentrioles differs sharply from that of the mature centriole. Elongation of procentrioles is completed in prometaphase, and their structure undergoes a number of successive changes. In the G2 period, pericentriolar satellites disappear and some time later a fibrillar halo is formed on both mother centrioles, i.e., spindle poles begin to form. In the cells that have left the mitotic cycle (G0 period), replication of centrioles does not take place; in many cells, a cilium is formed on the mother centriole. In a small number of cells a cilium is formed in the S and G2 periods, but unlike the cilium in the G0 period it does not reach the surface of the cell. In all cases, it locates on the centriole with appendages. At the beginning of the G1 period, during the G2 period, and in nonciliated cells in the G0 period, one of the centrioles is situated perpendicular to the substrate. On the whole, it takes a mature centriole a cycle and a half to form in PE cells.     

Nucleoporin Nup62 maintains centrosome homeostasis

Centrosomes are comprised of 2 orthogonally arranged centrioles surrounded by the pericentriolar material (PCM), which serves as the main microtubule organizing center of the animal cell. More importantly, centrosomes also control spindle polarity and orientation during mitosis. Recently, we and other investigators discovered that several nucleoporins play critical roles during cell division. Here, we show that nucleoporin Nup62 plays a novel role in centrosome integrity. Knockdown of Nup62 induced mitotic arrest in G₂/M phases and mitotic cell death. Depletion of Nup62 using RNA interference results in defective centrosome segregation and centriole maturation during the G₂ phase. Moreover, Nup62 depletion in human cells leads to the appearance of multinucleated cells and induces the formation of multipolar centrosomes, centriole synthesis defects, dramatic spindle orientation defects, and centrosome component rearrangements that impair cell bi-polarity. Our results also point to a potential role of Nup62 in targeting gamma-tubulin and SAS-6 to the centrioles.