Perception of the auxin signal at the plasma membrane of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts

Auxin-induced variations of transmembrane potential difference have been shown to be a useful tool for analyzing hormone sensitivity in tobacco protoplasts. Using this technique, we demonstrated that protoplasts derived from wild-type, an auxin-resistant mutant and Agrobacterium-rhizogenes transformed plants differed widely in the sensitivity of their electrical response to naphthalene acetic acid. We have used different antibodies, raised to auxin binding proteins (ABP) from maize coleoptiles, or to the axr1 gene product (ABP1), to test whether changes in auxin sensitivity can be correlated with the presence of tobacco proteins immunologically related to this ABP. Titrations indicated that 0.4 nM anti-ABP IgG inhibited 50% of the auxin-specific response of wild-type protoplasts, whereas 0.04 nM or 4 nM anti-ABP IgG were necessary to inhibit the response of mutant and transformed protoplasts, respectively, to the same extent. On wild-type protoplasts, blocking part of the immunoreactive sites with anti-ABP antibodies resulted in a decrease in auxin sensitivity of the electrical response (0.4 nM anti-ABP IgG inducing a 10–fold decrease), whereas addition of maize ABP increased this auxin sensitivity (1 pM ABP1 raised the sensitivity more than 1000–fold). The results obtained suggest that the auxin sensitivity detected by our assay system correlates with the amount of tobacco proteins immunologically related to the axr¹ gene product from maize. A hypothesis accounting for the presence of these proteins at the external surface of tobacco protoplasts and for the effects of hetero-logous maize ABP on auxin sensitivity is proposed.     

Auxin-binding proteins without KDEL sequence in the moss Funaria hygrometrica

Whereas the important plant growth regulator auxin has multiple effects in flowering plants, it induces a specific cell differentiation step in the filamentous moss protonema. Here, we analyse the presence of classical auxin-binding protein (ABP1) homologues in the moss Funaria hygrometrica. Microsomal membranes isolated from protonemata of F. hygrometrica have specific indole acetic acid-binding sites, estimated to be about 3–5 pmol/mg protein with an apparent dissociation constant (K _d) between 3 and 5 μM. Western analyses with anti-ABP1 antiserum detected the canonical endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localised 22–24 kDa ABP1 in Zea mays, but not in F. hygrometrica. Instead, polypeptides of 31–33 and 46 kDa were labelled in the moss as well as in maize. In F. hygrometrica these proteins were found exclusively in microsomal membrane fractions and were confirmed as ABPs by photo-affinity labelling with 5-azido-[7-³H]-indole-3-acetic acid. Unlike the classical corn ABP1, these moss ABPs did not contain the KDEL ER retention sequence. Consistently, the fully sequenced genome of the moss Physcomitrella patens, a close relative of F. hygrometrica, encodes an ABP1-homologue without KDEL sequence. Our study suggests the presence of putative ABPs in F. hygrometrica that share immunological epitopes with ABP1 and bind auxin but are different from the classical corn ABP1.     

Retention of maize auxin-binding protein in the endoplasmic reticulum: quantifying escape and the role of auxin

The localisation of maize (Zea mays L.) auxin-binding protein (ABP1) has been studied using a variety of techniques. At the whole-tissue level, tissue printing indicated that ABP1 is expressed to similar levels in all cells of the maize coleoptile and in the enclosed leaf roll. Within cells, the signals from immunofluorescence and immunogold labelling of ultrathin sections both indicated that ABP1 is confined to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), none being detected in either Golgi apparatus or cell wall. This distribution is consistent with targeting motifs in its sequence. These observations are discussed with reference to the various reports which place a population of ABP1 on the outer face of the plasma membrane, including those suggesting that it is necessary on the cell surface for rapid, auxin-mediated protoplast hyperpolarisation. We have tested one proposed model to account for release of ABP1 from the ER, namely that auxin binding induces a conformational change in ABP1 leading to concealment of the KDEL retention motif. Using double-label immunofluorescence the characteristic auxin-induced rise in Golgi-apparatus signal was found, yet no change in the distribution of the ABP1 signal was detected. Maize suspension cultures were used to assay for auxin-promoted secretion of ABP1 into the medium, but secretion was below the limit of detection. This can be ascribed at least partly to the very active acidification of the medium by these cells and the instability of ABP1 in solution below pH 5.0. In the insect-baculovirus expression system, in which cell cultures maintain pH 6.2, a small amount of ABP1 secretion, less than 1% of the total, was detected under all conditions. Insect cells were shown to take up auxin and no inactivation of added auxin was detected, but auxin did not affect the level of ABP1 in the medium. Consequently, no evidence was found to support the model for auxin promotion of ABP1 secretion. Finally, quantitative glycan analysis was used to determine what proportion of ABP1 might reach the plasma membrane in maize coleoptile tissue. The results suggest that less than 15% of ABP1 ever escapes from the ER as far as the cis-Golgi and less than 2% passes further through the secretory pathway. Such leakage rates probably do not require a specialised mechanism allowing ABP1 past the KDEL retrieval pathway, but we are not able to rule out the possibility that some ABP1 is carried through associated with other proteins. The data are consistent with the presence of ABP1 both on the plasma membrane and in the ER. The relative sizes of the two pools explain the results obtained with immunofluorescence and immunogold labelling and illustrate the high efficiency of ER retention in plants. Received: 31 October 1996 / Accepted: 16 December 1996     

Two distinct signaling pathways participate in auxin-induced swelling of pea epidermal protoplasts

Protoplast swelling was used to investigate auxin signaling in the growth-limiting stem epidermis. The protoplasts of epidermal cells were isolated from elongating internodes of pea (Pisum sativum). These protoplasts swelled in response to auxin, providing the clearest evidence that the epidermis can directly perceive auxin. The swelling response to the natural auxin IAA showed a biphasic dose response curve but that to the synthetic auxin 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) showed a simple bell-shaped dose response curve. The responses to IAA and NAA were further analyzed using antibodies raised against ABP1 (auxin-binding protein 1), and their dependency on extracellular ions was investigated. Two signaling pathways were resolved for IAA, an ABP1-dependent pathway and an ABP1-independent pathway that is much more sensitive to IAA than the former. The response by the ABP1 pathway was eliminated by anti-ABP1 antibodies, had a higher sensitivity to NAA, and did not depend on extracellular Ca(2+). In contrast, the response by the non-ABP1 pathway was not affected by anti-ABP1 antibodies, had no sensitivity to NAA, and depended on extracellular Ca(2+). The swelling by either pathway required extracellular K(+) and Cl(-). The auxin-induced growth of pea internode segments showed similar response patterns, including the occurrence of two peaks in the dose response curve for IAA and the difference in Ca(2+) requirements. It is suggested that two signaling pathways participate in auxin-induced internode growth and that the non-ABP1 pathway is more likely to be involved in the control of growth by constitutive concentrations of endogenous auxin.     

The auxin signal for protoplast swelling is perceived by extracellular ABP1

Protoplasts of corn coleoptiles and Arabidopsis hypocotyls respond to the plant hormone auxin with a rapid change in volume. We checked the effect of antibodies directed against epitopes of auxin-binding protein 1 from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtERabp1) and Zea mays (ZmERabp1), respectively. Antibodies raised against the C-terminus of AtERabp1 inhibited the response to auxin, while antibodies raised against a part of box a, the putative auxin-binding domain, induced a swelling response similar to that caused by auxin treatment. Synthetic C-terminal oligopeptides of ZmERabp1 also caused a swelling response. These effects occurred regardless of whether the experiments were carried out with homologous (anti-AtERabp1 antibodies on Arabidopsis protoplasts or anti-ZmERabp1 antibodies in maize protoplasts) or heterologous immunological tools. The results indicate that the auxin signal for protoplast swelling is perceived by extracellular ABP1.     

Monoclonal antibodies detect an auxin-induced conformational change in the maize auxin-binding protein

The monoclonal antibody MAC 256 precipitates specifically the auxin-binding protein (ABP) of maize membranes. Auxin-binding activity was recovered from the immunoprecipitate and MAC 256 can, therefore, bind undenatured, native ABP. A sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to present native ABP to MAC 256 and under these conditions auxins inhibit antibody binding. Millimolar naphthalene-1-acetic acid completely blocks MAC 256 binding and the characteristics of monoclonal antibody MAC 259 are similar. The ability of a range of auxins and related compounds to displace MAC 256 correlates with the known structure-activity relationships of these compounds in vivo and in binding assays. The results are interpreted in terms of an auxin-induced conformational change in ABP, auxin binding leading to a change in, or concealment of, the epitope of the antibody. The epitope for MAC 256 and 259 lies close to the carboxy terminus of the protein, implying that the part of ABP containing the sequence of amino acids responsible for retention within the endoplasmic reticulum is conformationally active.Abbreviations ABP auxin-binding protein - ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay - IAA indole-3-acetic acid - Mab monoclonal antibody - NAA naphthalene-1-acetic acid - SDS-PAGE sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis - TIBA 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid - 2,4,5-T, 2,4,6-T 2,4,5-trichloro- and 2,4,6-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid, respectively We are grateful to Neville Huskisson and Pat Baker of the Microchemical Facility, AFRC IAPGR, Babraham, UK for the aminoacid sequencing and to the staff at the AFRC Monoclonal Antibody Centre, Babraham where the Mabs were produced. This work was partially funded by the Biotechnology Action Programme of the European Economic Community.To whom correspondence should be addressed.     

KDEL-Containing Auxin-Binding Protein Is Secreted to the Plasma Membrane and Cell Wall

The auxin-binding protein ABP1 has been postulated to mediate auxin-induced cellular changes associated with cell expansion. This protein contains the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retention signal, the tetrapeptide lysine-aspartic acid-glutamic acid-leucine (KDEL), at its carboxy terminus, consistent with previous subcellular fractionation data that indicated an ER location for ABP1. We used electron microscopic immunocytochemistry to identify the subcellular localization of ABP1. Using maize (Zea mays) coleoptile tissue and a black Mexican sweet (BMS) maize cell line, we found that ABP1 is located in the ER as expected, but is also on or closely associated with the plasma membrane and within the cell wall. Labeling of the Golgi apparatus suggests that the transport of ABP1 to the cell wall occurs via the secretory system. Inhibition of secretion of an ABP homolog into the medium of BMS cell cultures by brefeldin A, a drug that specifically blocks secretion, is consistent with this secretion pathway. The secreted protein was recognized by an anti-KDEL peptide antibody, strongly supporting the interpretation that movement of this protein out of the ER does not involve loss of the carboxy-terminal signal. Cells starved for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid for 72 h retained less ABP in the cell and secreted more of it into the medium. The significance of our observations is 2-fold. We have identified a KDEL-containing protein that specifically escapes the ER retention system, and we provide an explanation for the apparent discrepancy that most of the ABP is located in the ER, whereas ABP and auxin act at the plasma membrane.     

Cycling of auxin-binding protein through the plant cell: pathways in auxin signal transduction.

The auxin receptor literature contains a glaring discrepancy that invites explanation. While some physiological experiments suggest that active auxin receptors are sited inside the cell, others point to action at the cell surface. Furthermore, although the major auxin-binding protein (ABP) of maize (Zea mays) coleoptiles is found in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), exogenous ABP can mediate auxin-dependent changes in the plasma membrane potential of protoplasts. How can an ER protein mediate changes in cell potential? To resolve this dilemma, I propose that ABP cycles through the cell. In response to auxin, ABP is released from the ER and follows a secretory pathway to the cell surface. After secretion, ABP would bind sites on the cell surface and become subject to endocytosis, cycling back to the ER. Elevated auxin would accelerate the cycling of ABP between the ER and the cell surface. If cell wall precursors interacted with ABP during their progression through the secretory pathway, this would provide a mechanism for regulating cell wall synthesis. At the cell surface ABP would regulate an enzyme responsible for maintaining membrane potential. Both of these responses are components of auxin-regulated growth. This hypothesis does not exclude other mechanisms of signal transduction, particularly in gene regulation.     

Molecular dynamics simulations of the auxin‐binding protein 1 in complex with indole‐3‐acetic acid and naphthalen‐1‐acetic acid

Auxin‐binding protein 1 (ABP1) is suggested to be an auxin receptor which plays an important role in several processes in green plants. Maize ABP1 was simulated with the natural auxin indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA) and the synthetic analog naphthalen‐1‐acetic acid (NAA), to elucidate the role of the KDEL sequence and the helix at the C‐terminus. The KDEL sequence weakens the intermolecular interactions between the monomers but stabilizes the C‐terminal helix. Conformational changes at the C‐terminus occur within the KDEL sequence and are influenced by the binding of the simulated ligands. This observation helps to explain experimental findings on ABP1 interactions with antibodies that are modulated by the presence of auxin, and supports the hypothesis that ABP1 acts as an auxin receptor. Stable hydrogen bonds between the monomers are formed between Glu40 and Glu62, Arg10 and Thr97, Lys39, and Glu62 in all simulations. The amino acids Ile22, Leu25, Trp44, Pro55, Ile130, and Phe149 are located in the binding pocket and are involved in hydrophobic interactions with the ring system of the ligand. Trp151 is stably involved in a face to end interaction with the ligand. The calculated free energy of binding using the linear interaction energy approach showed a higher binding affinity for NAA as compared to IAA. Our simulations confirm the asymmetric behavior of the two monomers, the stronger interaction of NAA than IAA and offers insight into the possible mechanism of ABP1 as an auxin receptor. Proteins 2014; 82:2744–2755. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Identification of a Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored Plasma Membrane Protein Interacting with the C-terminus of Auxin-binding Protein 1: A Photoaffinity Crosslinking Study

Synthetic peptides corresponding to the C-terminus of auxin-binding protein 1 (ABP1) have been shown to function as auxin agonists. To define a C-terminal receptor, photoaffinity crosslinking experiments were performed using an azido derivative of a C-terminal peptide and plasma membranes from maize (Zea mays L.). The crosslinking reaction was monitored by immunoblotting using anti-ABP1 antibodies. The crosslinked proteins were isolated by 2D gel electrophoresis and identified by mass spectrometric analysis. Further, the noncrosslinked forms of these proteins were also identified. Two proteins with apparent molecular masses of 73 kDa (termed C-terminal peptide-binding protein 1, CBP1) and 35 kDa (CBP2) were specifically linked with the C-terminal peptide. CBP2 is a cytoplasmic protein that consists of two conserved domains that are characteristic of a ricin-type lectin domain. CBP2 remained in the detergent-insoluble particles and was released from the particles by the addition of monosaccharides such as methyl-β-d-galactopyranoside. CBP1 was released from the membranes by treatment with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, indicating that CBP1 is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored plasma membrane protein. CBP1 was found to be a copper-binding protein, and is highly homologous to Arabidopsis thaliana SKU5 that contributes to directional root growth processes. Further, it is similar to A. thaliana SKS6 that contributes to cotyledon vascular patterning and to Nicotiana tabacum NTP303 that contributes to pollen tube growth. The present results indicate that ABP1 may contribute to directional cell growth processes via the GPI-anchored plasma membrane protein SKU5 and its family members.     

Overexpression of auxin-binding protein enhances the sensitivity of guard cells to auxin

To explore the role of auxin-binding protein (ABP1) in planta, a number of transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) lines were generated. The wild-type KDEL endoplasmic reticulum targeting signal was mutated to HDEL, another common retention sequence in plants, and to KEQL or KDELGL to compromise its activity. The auxin-binding kinetics of these forms of ABP1 were found to be similar to those of ABP1 purified from maize (Zea mays). To test for a physiological response mediated by auxin, intact guard cells of the transgenic plants were impaled with double-barreled microelectrodes, and auxin-dependent changes in K(+) currents were recorded under voltage clamp. Exogenous auxin affected inwardly and outwardly rectifying K(+) currents in a dose-dependent manner. Auxin sensitivity was markedly enhanced in all plants overexpressing ABP1, irrespective of the form present. Immunogold electron microscopy was used to investigate the localization of ABP1 in the transgenic plants. All forms were detected in the endoplasmic reticulum and the KEQL and KDELGL forms passed further across the Golgi stacks than KDEL and HDEL forms. However, neither electron microscopy nor silver-enhanced immunogold epipolarization microscopy revealed differences in cell surface ABP1 abundance for any of the plants, including control plants, which indicated that overexpression of ABP1 alone was sufficient to confer increased sensitivity to added auxin. Jones et al. ([1998] Science 282: 1114-1117) found increased cell expansion in transgenic plants overexpressing wild-type ABP1. Single cell recordings extend this observation, with the demonstration that the auxin sensitivity of guard cell K(+) currents is mediated, at least in part, by ABP1.     

Authentic processing and targeting of active maize auxin-binding protein in the baculovirus expression system.

The major auxin-binding protein (ABP1) from maize (Zea mays L.) has been expressed in insect cells using the baculovirus expression system. The recombinant protein can be readily detected in total insect cell lysates by Coomassie blue staining on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Our data suggest that ABP1 is processed similarly in both insect cells and maize. The signal peptide is cleaved at the same position as in maize and the mature protein undergoes tunicamycin-sensitive glycosylation, yielding a product with the same mobility on SDS-PAGE as authentic maize ABP1. On immunoblots the expressed protein is recognized by anti-KDEL monoclonal antibodies. Immunofluorescence localization demonstrates that it is targeted to and retained in the endoplasmic reticulum of insect cells in accordance with its signal peptide and KDEL retention sequence. The expressed ABP1 also appears to be active, since extracts of insect cells expressing ABP1 contain a saturable high-affinity 1-naphthylacetic acid-binding site, whereas no saturable auxin-binding activity is detected in extracts from control cells.     

The auxin-binding protein 1 is essential for the control of cell cycle

The phytohormone auxin has been known for >50 years to be required for entry into the cell cycle. Despite the critical effects exerted by auxin on the control of cell division, the molecular mechanism by which auxin controls this pathway is poorly understood, and how auxin is perceived upstream of any change in the cell cycle is unknown. Auxin Binding Protein 1 (ABP1) is considered to be a candidate auxin receptor, triggering early modification of ion fluxes across the plasma membrane in response to auxin. ABP1 has also been proposed to mediate auxin-dependent cell expansion, and is essential for early embryonic development. We investigated whether ABP1 has a role in the cell cycle. Functional inactivation of ABP1 in the model plant cell system BY2 was achieved through cellular immunization via the conditional expression of a single-chain fragment variable (scFv). This scFv was derived from a well characterized anti-ABP1 monoclonal antibody previously shown to block the activity of the protein. We demonstrate that functional inactivation of ABP1 results in cell-cycle arrest, and provide evidence that ABP1 plays a critical role in regulation of the cell cycle by acting at both the G1/S and G2/M checkpoints. We conclude that ABP1 is essential for the auxin control of cell division and is likely to constitute the first step of the auxin-signalling pathway mediating auxin effects on the cell cycle.     

The auxin-binding protein Nt-ERabp1 alone activates an auxin-like transduction pathway

Hyperpolarization of tobacco protoplasts is amongst the earliest auxin responses described. It has been proposed that the auxin-binding protein, ABP1, or a related protein could be involved in the first step of auxin perception at the plasma membrane. Using for the first time homologous conditions for interaction between the protein Nt-ERabp1 or a synthetic peptide corresponding to the C-terminus and tobacco protoplasts, we have demonstrated that both can induce the hyperpolarization response. The results show that Nt-ERabp1 or the C-terminal peptide alone activates the auxin pathway from the outer face of the plasma membrane.     

Addition of an ER retention signal to the ricin A chain increases the cytotoxicity of the holotoxin.

With the exception of diphtheria toxin, which translocates from acidified endosomes, the intracellular organelle from which the catalytic moieties of several plant and bacterial toxins enter the target cell during endocytic uptake has not been identified. We have recently proposed that some toxins may travel the entire secretory pathway in reverse, moving from the cell surface to the lumen of the ER, before entering the cytosol. Several bacterial toxins have the ER retention sequence KDEL or a related analogue at their carboxyl termini, suggesting that the KDEL receptor may play a role in delivering these toxins to the ER. Here we provide further support for this possibility since the cytotoxicity of ricin, which lacks a KDEL sequence, can be significantly increased by adding KDEL to the C-terminus of its A chain.     

Conformational dynamics underlie the activity of the auxin-binding protein, Nt-abp1.

The auxin-binding protein 1 (ABP1) has been proposed to be involved in the perception of the phytohormone at the plasma membrane. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed on highly conserved residues at the C terminus of ABP1 to investigate their relative importance in protein folding and activation of a functional response at the plasma membrane. Detailed analysis of the dynamic interaction of the wild-type ABP1 and mutated proteins with three distinct monoclonal antibodies recognizing conformation-dependent epitopes was performed by surface plasmon resonance. The influence of auxin on these interactions was also investigated. The Cys(177) as well as Asp(175) and Glu(176) were identified as critical residues for ABP1 folding and action at the plasma membrane. On the contrary, the C-terminal KDEL sequence was demonstrated not to be essential for auxin binding, interaction with the plasma membrane, or activation of the transduction cascade although it does appear to be involved in the stability of ABP1. Taken together, the results confirmed that ABP1 conformational change is the critical step for initiating the signal from the plasma membrane.     

Cloning and expression of two genes encoding auxin-binding proteins from tobacco

Two genes encoding the auxin-binding protein (ABP1) of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.), both of which possess the characteristics of a luminal protein of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), were isolated and sequenced. These genes were composed of at least five exons and four introns. The two coding exons showed 95% sequence homology and coded for two precursor proteins of 187 amino acid residues with molecular masses of 21 256 and 21 453 Da. The deduced amino acid sequences were 93% identical and both possessed an amino-terminal signal peptide, a hydrophilic mature protein region with two potential N-glycosylation sites and a carboxyl-terminal sorting signal, KDEL, for the ER. Restriction mapping of the cDNAs encoding tobacco ABP1, previously purified by amplification of tobacco cDNA libraries by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers common to both genes, indicated that both genes were expressed, although one was expressed at a higher level than the other. Genomic Southern blot hybridization showed no other homologous genes except for these two in the tobacco genome. The apparent molecular mass of the mature form of tobacco ABP1 was revealed to be 25 kDa by SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using affinity-purified anti (tobacco ABP1) antibodies raised against a fusion protein with maltose-binding protein. Expression of the recombinant ABP1 gene in transgenic tobacco resulted in accumulation of the 25 kDa protein. A single point mutation of an amino acid residue at either of the two potential N-glycosylation sites resulted in a decrease in the apparent molecular mass and produced a 22 kDa protein. Mutations at both sites resulted in the formation of a 19.3 kDa protein, suggesting that tobacco ABP1 is glycosylated at two asparagine residues.     

PROTEIN RETENTION IN THE ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM OF INSECT CELLS IS NOT COMPROMISED BY BACULOVIRUS INFECTION

High level expression of the major auxin-binding protein (ABP1) from maize (Zea maysL.) has been used to demonstrate that the machinery for retaining proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of insect cells functions efficiently throughout the baculovirus infection cycle. Immuno-localization showed wild-type ABP1 (ABP1-KDEL) to be targeted to the lumen of the ER, in accordance with its signal peptide and carboxyterminal KDEL ER-retention signal. The protein accumulated in dilations of the ER, and none was detected at the cell surface. Immunoblotting of concentrated culture medium confirmed that ABP1-KDEL was not secreted at a detectable level. In contrast, when the carboxyterminus was mutated to KEQL, secretion of the baculovirus-expressed protein was readily detected. Immunolocalization and immunoblotting demonstrated that a high proportion of the ABP1-KEQL protein was secreted at the cell surface and into the culture medium. The data demonstrate that the ER of insect cells has a great capacity to retain proteins and that this property is largely unaffected by the cellular disruption caused by baculovirus replication.     

Do we have the auxin receptor yet?

Several auxin-binding proteins (ABP) have now been identified using a variety of techniques. A 43-kDa glycoprotein thought to be a dimer of 22-kDa subunits has been identified as a strong candidate for the auxin receptor that mediates cell elongation in etiolated maize shoots. The primary sequence has been deduced and several interesting structural features have been discerned. There is indirect evidence that this 22-kDa ABP has a receptor function, the most compelling being that antibodies directed against the ABP can block an auxin-induced response. There is evidence that changes in auxin-induced growth capacity in shoots correlates with changes in the abundance of the 22-kDa ABP suggesting that in some cases the 22-kDa ABP may be limiting growth. Confirmation of receptor function for one of these newly-identified ABP's should open the way for genetic manipulation of crop growth.