Prospective timing, attention and the switch. A response to 'Gating or switching? gating is a better model of prospective timing' by Zakay

In response to the 'Switching or gating' paper (Lejeune, H., 1998. Switching or gating? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time. Behav. Proc. 44, 127-145), Zakay argued that attention allocation to time should reflect attentional processes in general and suggested that the attentional gate model (AGM) has more explanatory power than the temporal information processing model (TIP) of Church (Church, R.M., 1984. Properties of the internal clock. In: Gibbon, J., Allan, L., (Eds.), Timing and Time Perception, vol. 423. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp. 566-582). The first point might not be challenged, provided that the specificity of the temporal stimulus is taken into account. Concerning the second point, we argue that the TIP model can account for human prospective timing and discuss differences between attention versus expectancy or motivation. We prefer a 'satellite' attention allocation process, targeting the switch and reference memory (Meck, W.H., 1983. Selective adjustment of the speed of the internal clock and memory processes. J. Exp. Psychol.: Anim. Behav. Proc. 9, 171-201) to an attentional gate serially included in the TIP model of Church.     

Dopamine modulation in the basal ganglia locks the gate to working memory

The prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia are deeply implicated in working memory. Both structures are subject to dopaminergic neuromodulation in a way that exerts a critical influence on the proper operation of working memory. We present a novel network model to elucidate the role of phasic dopamine in the interaction of these two structures in initiating and maintaining mnemonic activity. We argue that neuromodulation plays a critical role in protecting memories against both internal and external sources of noise. Increases in cortical gain engendered by prefrontal dopamine release help make memories robust against external distraction, but do not offer protection against internal noise accompanying recurrent cortical activity. Rather, the output of the basal ganglia provides the gating function of stabilization against noise and distraction by enhancing select memories through targeted disinhibition of cortex. Dopamine in the basal ganglia effectively locks this gate by influencing the stability of up and down states in the striatum. Dopamine's involvement in affective processing endows this gating with specificity to motivational salience. We model a spatial working memory task and show that these combined effects of dopamine lead to superior performance. Action editor: Misha V. Tsodyks     

Time sharing in rats: A peak-interval procedure with gaps and distracters

Four hypotheses (switch, instructional-ambiguity, memory decay, and time sharing) were evaluated in a reversed peak-interval procedure with gaps by presenting distracter stimuli during the uninterrupted timed signal. The switch, instructional-ambiguity, and memory-decay hypotheses predict that subjects should time through the distracter and delay responding during gaps. The time-sharing hypothesis assumes that the internal clock shares attentional and working-memory resources with other processes, so that both gaps and distracters delay timing by causing working memory to decay. We found that response functions were displaced both by gaps and by distracters. Computer simulations show that when combined, the memory-decay and time-sharing hypotheses can mechanistically address present data, suggesting that these two hypotheses may reflect different levels of analysis of the same phenomenon.     

Acute Effects of Typical and Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs on the Release of Dopamine from Prefrontal Cortex, Nucleus Accumbens, and Striatum of the Rat: An In Vivo Microdialysis Study

In vivo microdialysis has been used to study the acute effects of antipsychotic drugs on the extracellular level of dopamine from the nucleus accumbens, striatum, and prefrontal cortex of the rat. (-)-Sulpiride (20, 50, and 100 mg/kg i.v.) and haloperidol (0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg i.v.) enhanced the outflow of dopamine in the striatum and nucleus accumbens. In the medial prefrontal cortex, (-)-sulpiride at all doses tested did not significantly affect the extracellular level of dopamine. The effect of haloperidol was also attenuated in the medial prefrontal cortex; 0.1 mg/kg did not increase the outflow of dopamine and the effect of 0.5 mg/kg haloperidol was of shorter duration in the prefrontal cortex than that observed in striatum and nucleus accumbens. The atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine (5 and 10 mg/kg) increased the extracellular concentration of dopamine in all three regions. In contrast to the effects of sulpiride and haloperidol, that of clozapine in the medial prefrontal cortex was profound. These data suggest that different classes of antipsychotic drugs may have distinct effects on the release of dopamine from the nigrostriatal, mesolimbic, and mesocortical terminals.     

Neuroleptics-induced changes of tyrosine hydroxylase activity in rat striatum in vitro and in vivo.

The potency of haloperidol and chlorpromazine, but not clozapine, for increasing homovanillic acid and activating tyrosine hydroxylase in the striatum was significantly weakened after the repeated administration in rats. These findings suggest that clozapine could supply enough dopamine to surmount the blockade of dopamine receptors in the striatum even after the repeated administration. This property of clozapine seems to be the cause of low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects in clinical use.     

Neuroleptics and Dopamine Transporters

The effects of neuroleptic treatments on dopamine transporters and on dopamine receptors was investigated in the forebrain of adult rats treated for 21 days with either haloperidol, clozapine or saline. The dopamine D₁receptors, labeled with [³H]SCH23390, increased in nucleus accumbens, latero-dorsal rostral neostriatum and substantia nigra, after clozapine but not haloperidol. The dopamine D₂receptors, studied with [³H]raclopride, increased in nucleus accumbens and in dorsolateral, ventro-medial and dorso-medial quadrants of the rostral neostriatum after either haloperidol or clozapine treatments, and also in latero-ventral rostral neostriatum but only after haloperidol. Haloperidol also up-regulated D₂receptors in rostral and caudal neostriatum, but clozapine produced a more uneven increase, especially in caudal neostriatum. In contrast, the densities of dopamine uptake sites, or transporters, labeled with [^I25I]RTI-121, remained unchanged after both neuroleptic treatments. The observation that dopamine transporters are resistant to treatments that modify D₁and D₂receptors indicates that these uptake sites can probably be ruled out as the target of neuroleptic drugs, and that dopamine receptor up-regulations can indeed occur independently of the densities of nerve endings at the terminal fields of innervation.     

Differential Effects of Locally Administered Clozapine and Haloperidol on Dopamine Efflux in the Rat Prefrontal Cortex and Caudate-Putamen

Abstract: Previous research has shown that systemically administered antipsychotic drugs enhance dopamine release from the nigrostriatal and mesocortical dopamine pathways. However, the degree of enhancement differs as a function of the drug used (atypical versus typical antipsychotic) and the dopamine pathway examined. The present studies examined whether these differences result from differential actions of these drugs on dopamine terminal regions. Clozapine or haloperidol was infused locally into the caudate-putamen or prefrontal cortex through reverse microdialysis. Although both drugs increased extracellular dopamine levels, clozapine produced greater effects than haloperidol in the prefrontal cortex, whereas haloperidol produced greater effects in the caudate-putamen. These results suggest that neurochemical differences within dopamine terminal regions may explain the differential actions of antipsychotic drugs on striatal and cortical dopamine release.     

Mechanisms involved in the neurotoxic and cognitive effects of developmental methamphetamine exposure

Methamphetamine exposure in utero leads to a variety of higher‐order cognitive deficits, such as decreased attention and working, and spatial memory impairments in exposed children (Piper et al., 2011; Roussotte et al., 2011; Kiblawi et al., 2011). As with other teratogens, the timing of methamphetamine exposure greatly determines its effects on both neuroanatomical and behavioral outcomes. Methamphetamine exposure in rodents during the third trimester human equivalent period of brain development results in distinct and long‐lasting route‐based and spatial navigation deficits (Williams et al., 2003; Vorhees et al., 2005, 2008, 2009;). Here, we examine the impact of neonatal methamphetamine‐induced neurotoxicity on behavioral outcomes, neurotransmission, receptor changes, plasticity proteins, and DNA damage. Birth Defects Research (Part C) 108:131–141, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The effect of clozapine on prolactin secretion at the level of the lactotroph

Clozapine is an antipsychotic drug which is unusual in that it has no dopamine receptor-blocking activity. Previous studies gave conflicting results whether administration of clozapine induces hyperprolactinemia. In the present study it was shown that a wide concentration range of clozapine does not interfere with dopamine-mediated inhibition of prolactin (PRL) secretion by normal cultured rat pituitary cells. This in contrast to other neuroleptics, like haloperidol and trifluoperazine. Clozapine does also not antagonize norepinephrine-mediated inhibition of PRL secretion. Clozapine exerts at micromolar concentrations a direct inhibitory action on PRL release by cultured normal rat pituitary cells. In cultured rat pituitary tumor cells, these high concentrations of clozapine directly inhibit PRL release as well as the DNA content of the cells, suggesting a direct antimitotic action. In this model clozapine was about 5-10 times less potent than trifluperazine. Clozapine and trifluoperazine exert an additive inhibitory action both on PRL release and on the DNA content of the pituitary tumor cells. It is concluded that clozapine does not interfere at the pituitary level with dopamine-mediated inhibition of PRL release. At micromolar concentrations clozapine may act on lactotrophs as a calmodulin-inhibitor. These observations suggest that the transient PRL-releasing effects which have been observed in both animal and human studies after clozapine administration are mediated via supra-pituitary actions of the drug.     

Pre- and postsynaptic effects of dopamine antagonists on dopaminergic synaptic transmission in Helix pomatia

The rate of transmitter mobilization in identified dopaminergic synapses was decreased by the dopamine antagonists pimozide, chlorpromazine, haloperidol, cis-flupenthixol, curare, clozapine and high concentrations of ergometrine. The depolarizing postsynaptic potential was inhibited by pimozide, chlorpromazine, haloperidol, cis-flupenthixol, curare, clozapine, (+)-butaclamol and high concentrations of ergometrine. The hyperpolarizing synaptic potential was inhibited by naloxone, methysergide, (+)-butaclamol, haloperidol, 6-hydroxydopamine and low concentrations of ergometrine, while pimozide, cis-flupenthixol, trans-flupenthixol, curare, clozapine, promethazine, chlorpromazine and (-)-butaclamol had no clear effect. The presynaptic receptors involved in modulation of the mobilization rate showed similarities with the dopamine receptors mediating depolarizations. The dopamine antagonists changed dynamics of synaptic transmission.     

Haloperidol but Not Clozapine Increases Neurotensin Receptor mRNA Levels in Rat Substantia Nigra

Abstract: We examined the effects of chronic (2 weeks) treatment with a typical neuroleptic, haloperidol (1 mg/kg, s.c.), and an atypical neuroleptic, clozapine (20 mg/kg, s.c.), on neurotensin receptor (NTR) mRNA levels by in situ hybridization histochemistry. Quantitative OD analysis showed haloperidol-induced NTR mRNA levels in the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/ VTA) 110% over control levels (significant difference from the control, p < 0.05). In contrast, the same analysis applied to the sections from clozapine-treated animals showed no significant change in NTR mRNA levels compared with matched control sections ( p > 0.05). Thus, chronic treatment with haloperidol but not clozapine resulted in elevated levels of NTR mRNA within the SN/VTA. These results suggest that the high incidence of extrapyramidal side effects of typical neuroleptics could result from changes in NTR expression in the SN/VTA.     

Clozapine increases rat serum prolactin levels.

Clozapine differs from other anti-psychotic drugs in that is produces little or no extrapyramidal side effects. The effects of clozapine on rat brain dopamine differ markedly from those of the neuroleptic drugs. The neuroleptics increase rat serum prolactin levels which has been attributed to their dopamine receptor blocking properties. We found that clozapine markedly increased serum prolactin levels in male rats when injected intraperitoneally in doses of 5, 10, 50 and 100 mg/kg. Serum prolactin levels after 5 mg/kg clozapine were significantly less than in rats given 10, 50 and 100 mg/kg which did not significantly differ from each other. Serum prolactin after 10 mg/kg clozapine was significantly greater than after chlorpromazine, 5 mg/kg and haloperidol, 0.5 mg/kg. The increases in serum prolactin are attributed to clozapine's ability to produce dopamine blockade or to inhibit nerve impulse-dopamine release, or both. The capacity of clozapine to affect brain serotonin and norepinephrine metabolism and its strong anti-cholinergic properties are probably not involved in its ability to increase serum prolactin.     

Dopaminergic supersensitivity in striatum and olfactory tubercle following chronic administration of haloperidol of clozapine

Mice were maintained on diets containing haloperidol or clozapine for 8–10 days. Two days after these drug-containing diets were withdrawn the effects of apomorphine were determined on locomotor activity and on the retardation of dopamine depletion produced by synthesis inhibition with α-methyltyrosine. After either neuroleptic the effects of apomorphine were enhanced when compared with mice maintained on a control diet, suggesting the development of supersensitive dopamine receptors.     

Specificity of the dopamine sensitive adenylate cyclase for antipsychotic antagonists

Chlorpromazine, haloperidol and clozapine are approximately equipotent in antagonizing dopamine sensitive adenylate cyclase activity in homogenates of rat brain striatum, in contrast to the differences in clinical antipsychotic potencies reported by others. The antagonism appeared to occur at a structurally specific dopamine site, as inhibition by a series of chlorpromazine analogues of similar hydrophobicity exhibited a structural specificity similar to that found for their neuroleptic and cataleptic activities. Sulpiride, a dopamine antagonist with antipsychotic activity, and metoclopramide, a structurally related central dopamine antagonist, failed to inhibit the dopamine sensitive adenylate cyclase. Pre-treatment of rats with haloperidol (3 mg/kg per day) for 6 or 28 days did not induce a supersensitive response of the adenylate cyclase to stimulation by dopamine or apomorphine or inhibition by clozapine. It was concluded that the dopamine sensitive adenylate cyclase may not be the site of action of all anti-psychotic agents.     

Convergent evidence from microdialysis and presynaptic immunolabeling for the regulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid release in the globus pallidus following acute clozapine or haloperidol administration in rats

Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) have been primarily characterized for their effects on dopaminergic terminal regions in the brain, especially within the corpus striatum. Efferent GABA pathways are the primary outflow of striatal processing via their projections to the substantia nigra and the globus pallidus (GP). In the current study, we analyzed changes in pallidal GABA function following acute APD administration by means of in vivo microdialysis, followed by immunolabeling of presynaptic GABA terminal density in the contralateral hemisphere of the same animals. Acute administration of the atypical APD, clozapine (10 or 30 mg/kg, s.c.), produced a dose-dependent decrease in extracellular GABA. A corresponding dose-dependent increase in the density of presynaptic terminal GABA immunolabeling in the GP was found. In contrast, the typical APD, haloperidol (1 or 3 mg/kg, s.c.), had no significant effects on either measure, although a non-significant increase in extracellular GABA and decrease in the density of GABA terminal immunolabeling was noted. Paw retraction tests conducted during the time of microdialysis showed that haloperidol produced a typical pattern of highly pronounced motor impairment, while clozapine showed an atypical profile of minimal catalepsy. These complementary results obtained from in vivo neurochemistry and presynaptic neurotransmitter labeling suggest that systemic clozapine suppresses neuronal GABA release within the GP. This decrease in released pallidal GABA may play a role in the low motor side-effect liability of atypical APDs.     

ON THE RELEVANCE OF PREFERENTIAL INCREASES OF MESOLIMBIC VERSUS STRIATAL DOPAMINE TURNOVER FOR THE PREDICTION OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC ACTIVITY OF PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS

Abstract— Drugs possessing (chlorpromazine, haloperidol, clozapine, thioridazine and sulpiride) or lacking (benzoctamine and perlapine) antipsychotic activity were compared with respect to their ability to enhance x-methyl-p-tyrosine-induced dopamine disappearance from the mesolimbic area and corpus striutum of rat brain. In addition, their effects on the endogenous concentrations of homovanillic (HVA) and 3.4-dihydroxyphenylacetic (DOPAC) acids in these two brain areas were determined. Some of the drugs enhanced dopamine disappearance in the mesolimbic area more than in the striatum. The most active in this respect were sulpiride. perlapine and chlorpromazine. By contrast, haloperidol was slightly more active in the striatum than in the mesolimbic area. None of the drugs was more efficient in elevating HVA levels in the mesolimbic area than in the striatum. However, there were large differences in the relative extent of the HVA increases in the two regions. Benzoctamine, perlapine and chlorpromazine increased HVA concentrations in the mesolimbic area nearly as much as in the striatum. Thioridazine and haloperidol, however, elevated striatal HVA much more effectively. Haloperidol and clozapine increased the DOPAC concentration in both areas to about the same extent. The other drugs were more active in the striatum. The largest difference between both regions was shown by chlorpromazine. Perlapine and benzoctamine, both lacking antipsychotic activity, produced much larger increases of HVA than of DOPAC. This is in contrast to the results obtained with true neuroleptics and may reflect an involvement of release phenomena in the action of these two drugs on dopamine metabolism. These results suggest that a preferential increase of dopamine turnover in the mesolimbic area is not necessarily linked to a better ratio of antipsychotic activity vs. extrapyramidal side effects. Moreover, an antiacetylcholine component of dopamine receptor blocking drugs does not seem to be a prerequisite for preferential activity on dopamine turnover in the mesolimbic system.     

Typical and Atypical Neuroleptics Induce Alteration in Blood-Brain Barrier and Brain 59FeCl3 Uptake

Abstract: Long-term neuroleptic medication of schizophrenic patients induces extrapyramidal motor side effects, of which tardive dyskinesia (TD) is the most severe. The etiology of TD is still obscure. Recently, it was suggested that abnormal iron metabolism may play a crucial role in neuroleptic-induced dopamine D₂ receptor super-sensitivity. The apparent relationship between neuroleptics and iron is further supported by the increase of iron in the basal ganglia of patients with TD. We now report on the ability of neuroleptics to alter the blood-brain barrier in the rat and to potentiate the normally limited iron transport into the brain. Thus, chronic treatment of rats with chlorpromazine and haloperidol facilitated ⁵⁹Fe³⁺ uptake into brain cells. In contrast, clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic neuroleptic with little extrapyramidal motor side effects, caused iron sedimentation in brain blood vessels with no sign of detectable iron in the cells. Moreover, chronic treatment with chlorpromazine and haloperidol caused a 43% and 24% reduction, respectively, in liver nonheme iron, whereas clozapine induced an 81% increase. The apparent different potentials of chlorpromazine, haloperidol, and clozapine to increase iron transport into the brain from its peripheral stores may be linked to the severity of extrapyramidal motor side effects they induce and to the pathophysiology of TD.     

A selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, NRA0160: a preclinical neuropharmacological profile

NRA0160, 5 - [2- ( 4- ( 3 - fluorobenzylidene) piperidin-1-yl) ethyl] - 4 -(4-fluorophenyl) thiazole-2-carboxamide, has a high affinity for human cloned dopamine D4.2, D4.4 and D4.7 receptors, with Ki values of 0.5, 0.9 and 2.7 nM, respectively. NRA0160 is over 20,000fold more potent at the dopamine D4.2 receptor compared with the human cloned dopamine D2L receptor. NRA0160 has negligible affinity for the human cloned dopamine D3 receptor (Ki=39 nM), rat serotonin (5-HT)2A receptors (Ki=180 nM) and rat alpha1 adrenoceptor (Ki=237 nM). NRA0160 and clozapine antagonized locomotor hyperactivity induced by methamphetamine (MAP) in mice. NRA0160 and clozapine antagonized MAP-induced stereotyped behavior in mice, although their effects did not exceed 50% inhibition, even at the highest dose given. NRA0160 and clozapine significantly induced catalepsy in rats, although their effects did not exceed 50% induction even at the highest dose given. NRA0160 and clozapine significantly reversed the disruption of prepulse inhibition (PPI) in rats produced by apomorphine. NRA0160 and clozapine significantly shortened the phencyclidine (PCP)-induced prolonged swimming latency in rats in a water maze task. These findings suggest that NRA0160 may have unique antipsychotic activities without the liability of motor side effects typical of classical antipsychotics.     

Effects of Subchronic Clozapine and Haloperidol on Striatal Glutamatergic Synapses

Abstract: Subchronic treatment with haloperidol increases the number of asymmetric glutamate synapses associated with a perforated postsynaptic density in the striatum. To characterize these synaptic changes further, the effects of subchronic (28 days) administration of an atypical antipsychotic, clozapine (30 mg/kg, s.c.), or a typical antipsychotic, haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.), on the binding of [³H]MK-801 to the NMDA receptor-linked ion channel complex and on the in situ hybridization of riboprobes for NMDAR2A and 2B subunits and splice variants of the NMDAR1 subunit were examined in striatal preparations from rats. The density of striatal glutamate immunogold labeling associated with nerve terminals of all asymmetric synapses and the immunoreactivity of those asymmetric synapses associated with a perforated postsynaptic density were also examined by electron microscopy. Subchronic neuroleptic administration had no effect on [³H]MK-801 binding to striatal membrane preparations. Both drugs increased glutamate immunogold labeling in nerve terminals of all asymmetric synapses, but only haloperidol increased the density of glutamate immunoreactivity within nerve terminals of asymmetric synapses containing a perforated postsynaptic density. Whereas subchronic administration of clozapine, but not haloperidol, resulted in a significant increase in the hybridization of a riboprobe that labels all splice variants of the NMDAR1 subunit, both drugs significantly decreased the abundance of NMDAR1 subunit mRNA containing a 63-base insert. Neither drug altered mRNA for the 2A subunit, but clozapine significantly increased hybridization of a probe for the 2B subunit. The data suggest that some neuroleptic effects may be mediated by glutamatergic systems and that typical and atypical antipsychotics can have varying effects on the density of glutamate in presynaptic terminals and on the expression of specific NMDA receptor splice variant mRNAs. Alternatively, NMDAR1 subunit splice variants may differentially respond to interactions with glutamate.     

Lack of effect of dopaminergic antagonists in a rodent model of peritoneal sepsis

Central nervous system dopaminergic mechanisms have been implicated in the cytokine response to stress and sepsis. We here describe the effects of haloperidol or clozapine in the treatment of sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture. Male Wistar rats were subjected to the CLP procedure were treated with haloperidol or clozapine and plasma cytokines, myeloperoxidase activity, markers of organ injury and survival was analyzed. The addition of haloperidol or clozapine to basic support did not diminished hepatic, renal, pancreatic or muscular damage observed after sepsis. Neither haloperidol, nor clozapine, modulates pro and antiinflammatory cytokines after sepsis induction. In addition, haloperidol treatment did not diminished myeloperoxidase activity in the kidney, lung or liver, or altered BALF markers of lung damage or inflammatory infiltration. Our data did not support a role of haloperidol or clozapine as an immunomodulator agent in the treatment of sepsis in an animal model of peritonitis.