首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Estradiol cypionate (ECP) was used in beef heifers receiving a controlled internal drug release (CIDR; insertion = Day 0) device for fixed-time AI (FTAI) in four experiments. In Experiment 1, heifers (n = 24) received 1mg ECP or 1mg ECP plus 50mg commercial progesterone (CP) preparation i.m. on Day 0. Eight or 9 days later, CIDR were removed, PGF was administered and heifers were allocated to receive 0.5mg ECP i.m. concurrently (ECP0) or 24h later (ECP24). There was no effect of treatment (P = 0.6) on mean (+/-S.E.M.) day of follicular wave emergence (3.9+/-0.4 days). Interval from CIDR removal to ovulation was affected (P<0.05) only by duration of CIDR treatment (88.3+/-3.8h versus 76.4+/-4.1h; 8 days versus 9 days, respectively). In Experiment 2, 58 heifers received 100mg progesterone and either 5mg estradiol-17beta or 1mg ECP i.m. (E-17beta and ECP groups, respectively) on Day 0. Seven (E-17beta group) or 9 days (ECP group) later, CIDR were removed, PGF was administered and heifers received ECP (as in Experiment 1) or 1mg EB 24h after CIDR removal, with FTAI 58-60h after CIDR removal. Follicular wave emergence was later (P<0.02) and more variable (P<0.002) in heifers given ECP than in those given E-17beta (4.1+/-0.4 days versus 3.3+/-0.1 days), but pregnancy rate was unaffected (overall, 69%; P = 0.2). In Experiment 3, 30 heifers received a CIDR device and 5mg E-17beta, with or without 100mg progesterone (P) i.m. on Day 0. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and heifers received ECP as described in Experiment 1 or no estradiol (Control). Intervals from CIDR removal to ovulation were shorter (P<0.05) in ECP0 (81.6+/-5.0h) and ECP24 (86.4+/-3.5h) groups than in the Control group (98.4+/-5.6h). In Experiment 4, heifers (n = 300) received a CIDR device, E-17beta, P, and PGF (as in Experiment 3) and after CIDR removal were allocated to three groups (as in Experiment 2), with FTAI 54-56h (ECP0) or 56-58h (ECP24 and EB24) after CIDR removal. Pregnancy rate did not differ among groups (overall, 63.6%, P = 0.96). In summary, although 1mg ECP (with or without progesterone) was less efficacious than 5mg E-17beta plus 100mg progesterone for synchronizing follicular wave emergence, 0.5mg ECP (at CIDR removal or 24h later) induced a synchronous ovulation with an acceptable pregnancy rate to fixed-time AI.  相似文献   

2.
Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of timing of prostaglandin F2(alpha) (PGF2(alpha)) administration, controlled internal drug release device (CIDR) removal and second gonodotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) administration on the pregnancy outcome in CIDR-based synchronization protocols. In Experiment 1, suckled Angus crossbred beef cows (n = 580) were given 100 microg of GnRH+a CIDR on Day 0. Cows in Group 1 (modified Ovsynch-P) received 25 mg of dinoprost (PGF2(alpha)) and CIDR device removal on Day 8 (AM), 100 microg of GnRH 36 h later on Day 9 (p.m.), and fixed-time AI (FTAI) 16 h later on Day 10 (47.5+/-1.1 h after PGF2(alpha)). Cows in Group 2 (Ovsynch-P) received 25mg of PGF2(alpha) and CIDR device removal on Day 7 (p.m.), 100 microg of GnRH 48 h later on Day 9 and FTAI 16 h later on Day 10 (66.6+/-1.2 h after PGF2(alpha)). Pregnancy rates were 56.5% (170/301) for Group 1 and 55.6% (155/279) for Group 2, respectively (P = 0.47). In Experiment 2, beef cows (n=734) were synchronized with 100 microg of GnRH+CIDR on Day 0, 25 mg of PGF2(alpha) and CIDR device removal on Day 7 and either 100 microg of GnRH 48 h later on Day 9 (Ovsynch-P) and FTAI 16 h later on Day 10 (64.9+/-3.3 h from PGF2(alpha)) or 100 microg of GnRH on Day 10 (CO-Synch-P) at the time of AI (63.2+/-4.2 h from PGF2(alpha)). Pregnancy rates were 48.8% (180/369) for Ovsynch-P and 44.7% (163/365) for CO-synch-P groups, respectively (P = 0.11). In both experiments, there was a locationxtreatment interaction (P<0.05); pregnancy rates between locations were different (P < 0.05) in the Ovsynch-P group. In conclusion, in a CIDR-based Ovsynch synchronization protocol, delaying administration of prostaglandin and CIDR removal by 12 h, or timing of the second GnRH by 16 h, did not affect pregnancy rates to FTAI. Therefore, there may be an opportunity to make changes in synchronization protocols with out adversely affecting FTAI pregnancy rates.  相似文献   

3.
The objective of this study was to evaluate protocols for synchronizing ovulation in beef cattle. In Experiment 1, Nelore cows (Bos indicus) at random stages of the estrous cycle were assigned to 1 of the following treatments: Group GP controls (nonlactating, n=7) received GnRH agonist (Day 0) and PGF2alpha (Day 7); while Groups GPG (nonlactating, n=8) and GPG-L (lactating, n=9) cows were given GnRH (Day 0), PGF2alpha (Day 7) and GnRH again (Day 8, 30 h after PGF2alpha). A new follicular wave was observed 1.79+/-0.34 d after GnRH in 19/24 cows. After PGF2alpha, ovulation occurred in 19/24 cows (6/7 GP, 6/8 GPG, 7/9 GPG-L). Most cows (83.3%) exhibited a dominant follicle just before PGF2alpha, and 17/19 ovulatory follicles were from a new follicular wave. There was a more precise synchrony of ovulation (within 12 h) in cows that received a second dose of GnRH (GPG and GPG-L) than controls (GP, ovulation within 48 h; P<0.01). In Experiment 2, lactating Nelore cows with a visible corpus luteum (CL) by ultrasonography were allocated to 2 treatments: Group GPE (n=10) received GnRH agonist (Day 0), PGF2alpha (Day 7) and estradiol benzoate (EB; Day 8, 24 h after PGF2alpha); while Group EPE (n=11), received EB (Day 0), PGF2alpha (Day 9) and EB (Day 10, 24 h after PGF2alpha). Emergence of a new follicular wave was observed 1.6+/-0.31 d after GnRH (Group GPE). After EB injection (Day 8) ovulation was observed at 45.38+/-2.03 h in 7/10 cows within 12 h. In Group EPE the emergence of a new follicular wave was observed later (4.36+/-0.31 d) than in Group GEP (1.6+/-0.31 d; P<0.001). After the second EB injection (Day 10) ovulation was observed at 44.16+/-2.21 h within 12 (7/11 cows) or 18 h (8/11 cows). All 3 treatments were effective in synchronizing ovulation in beef cows. However, GPE and, particularly, EPE treatments offer a promising alternative to the GPG protocol in timed artificial insemination of beef cattle, due to the low cost of EB compared with GnRH agonists.  相似文献   

4.
The objective was to evaluate the effects of plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations and exogenous eCG on ovulation and pregnancy rates of pubertal Nellore heifers in fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocols. In Experiment 1 (Exp. 1), on Day 0 (7 d after ovulation), heifers (n = 15) were given 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) im and randomly allocated to receive: an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device containing 0.558 g of P4 (group 0.5G, n = 4); an intravaginal device containing 1 g of P4 (group 1G, n = 4); 0.558 g of P4 and PGF (PGF; 150 μg d-cloprostenol, group 0.5G/PGF, n = 4); or 1 g of P4 and PGF (group 1G/PGF, n = 3). On Day 8, PGF was given to all heifers and intravaginal devices removed; 24 h later (Day 9), all heifers were given 1 mg EB im. In Exp. 2, pubertal Nellore heifers (n = 292) were treated as in Exp. 1, with FTAI on Day 10 (30 to 36 h after EB). In Exp. 3, pubertal heifers (n = 459) received the treatments described for groups 0.5G/PGF and 1G/PGF and were also given 300 IU of eCG im (groups 0.5G/PGF/eCG and 1G/PGF/eCG) at device removal (Day 8). In Exp. 1, plasma P4 concentrations were significantly higher in heifers that received 1.0 vs 0.588 g P4, and were significantly lower in heifers that received PGF on Day 0. In Exp. 2 and 3, there were no significant differences among groups in rates of ovulation (65-77%) or pregnancy (Exp. 2: 26-33%; Exp. 3: 39-43%). In Exp. 3, diameter of the dominant ovarian follicle on Day 9 was larger in heifers given 0.558 g vs 1.0 g P4 (10.3 ± 0.2 vs 9.3 ± 0.2 mm; P < 0.01). In conclusion, lesser amounts of P4 in the intravaginal device or PGF on Day 0 decreased plasma P4 from Days 1 to 8 and increased diameter of the dominant follicle on Day 9. However, neither of these nor 300 IU of eCG on Day 8 significantly increased rates of ovulation or pregnancy.  相似文献   

5.
The objective of Experiment 1 was to compare the effects of estradiol benzoate (EB) given 0 or 24h after the end of a progestagen treatment on ovulation and CL formation in anestrous cows. Twenty cows were treated with an intravaginal sponge containing 250 mg of medroxiprogesterone acetate (MPA). At sponge insertion, each cow received 3 mg EB and 10 mg MPA im. At device removal, cows received 0.7 mg EB either at that time (EB0) or 24h later (EB24). Ultrasound examinations and blood sampling to determine plasma progesterone concentrations were performed to detect ovulation and CL formation. Ovulation occurred in 77.8 and 81.8% cows in the EB0 and EB24 groups, respectively. Diameter of the ovulatory follicle (EB0 = 10.9 +/- 0.5mm; EB24 = 12.1 +/- 0.8 mm; P = 0.26) and the interval from sponge removal to ovulation (median = 3 days; P = 0.64) did not differ between treatments. Among the cows that ovulated (n = 16), short-lived CL were present in 2/7 and 2/9 cows in the EB0 and EB24 groups, respectively. Plasma progesterone concentrations and CL area did not differ between treatments (P > 0.05). In Experiment 2, cows were treated with the same protocol as in Experiment 1, but at sponge withdrawal all cows received 250 microg cloprostenol and timed artificial insemination (TAI) was performed 48 h after sponge removal. In Replicate 1 (n = 204 multiparous cows), pregnancy rates were 45.0 and 47.5% for EB0 and EB24, respectively (P > 0.05). In Replicate 2 (n = 69 primiparous cows) pregnancy rate did not differ between EB0 and EB24 (51.4% versus 52.9%). In conclusion, EB given 0 or 24h after the end of a progestagen treatment had the same effect on ovulation rate, time to ovulation, diameter of the ovulatory follicle, incidence of short-lived CL, luteal tissue area, and plasma progesterone concentrations of normal lifespan CL, and pregnancy rate after TAI in suckled beef cows.  相似文献   

6.
The objective was to determine whether eCG in an ovulation synchronization protocol with an intravaginal progesterone (P4)-releasing device (IPRD) containing a low dose of P4 improves pregnancy rate (PR) to fixed-time AI (FTAI) in Bos indicus heifers. Day 0, 2 y old Brahman heifers were allocated to either eCG+ (n = 159) or eCG- (n = 157) treatment groups. All heifers were weighed, body condition scored (BCS), and ultrasonographically examined to measure uterine horn diameter and presence of a CL. On Day 0, all heifers received a low-dose IPRD (0.78 g P4) and 1 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) im. On Day 8, the IPRD was removed, all heifers received 500 μg cloprostenol im, and those in the eCG+ treatment group received 300 IU of eCG im. On Day 9, all heifers received 1 mg EB im. All heifers were FTAI 52 to 56 h after IPRD removal. Ten days after FTAI, heifers were exposed to bulls. Heifers were diagnosed as pregnant to FTAI, natural mating, or not detectably pregnant (NDP) 65 d after FTAI. Treatment with eCG+ as compared to eCG- did not affect PR to FTAI (28.9 vs 30.6%; P = 0.590), natural mating (51.3 vs 47.7%; P = 0.595), or overall (65.4 vs 63.7%; P = 0.872). Mean live weight gain from Days 0 to 65 d post-FTAI was higher in heifers pregnant to FTAI (72.29 ± 4.26 kg; P = 0.033) and overall (66.83 ± 3.65 kg; P = 0.021), compared to heifers that were NDP (60.03 ± 3.16 kg). Uterine diameter group, 9–11, 12–13, and 14–20 mm (26.2, 31.3, and 33.3%; P = 0.256), presence and absence of CL (29.8 vs 29.4%; P = 0.975), AI technicians 1, 2, and 3 (32.6, 28.8, and 22.4%; P = 0.293) and sires A, B, and C (23.9, 36.0 and 27.0%; P = 0.122) had no effect on PR to FTAI, natural mating, or overall. In conclusion, treatment of primarily cycling Brahman heifers with 300 IU eCG in conjunction with a low P4-dose (0.78 g) IPRD and EB to synchronize ovulation, did not improve PR after FTAI, natural mating, or overall.  相似文献   

7.
Three experiments were conducted to: (1) compare the effect of three oestradiol formulations on gonadotrophin release in ovariectomised cows; (2) compare the effects of either oestradiol-17beta (E-17beta) or oestradiol benzoate (EB), given at two doses, on the synchrony of ovarian follicular wave emergence in CIDR-treated beef cattle; and (3) determine the timing of ovulation of the dominant follicle of a synchronised follicular wave following administration of E-17beta or EB 24h after progesterone withdrawal. In Experiment 1, ovariectomised cows (n = 16) received a once-used CIDR on Day 0 (beginning of the experiment) and were allocated randomly to receive 5mg of E-17beta, EB or oestradiol valerate (EV) plus 100mg progesterone i.m. The CIDR inserts were removed on Day 7. There were effects of time, and a treatment-by-time interaction (P < 0.0001) for plasma concentrations of both oestradiol and FSH. Plasma oestradiol concentrations peaked 12h after treatment, with highest (P < 0.01) peak concentrations in cows given E-17beta; estradiol concentrations subsequently returned to baseline by 36 h in E-17beta-treated cows and by 96 h in EB- and EV-treated cows. Plasma FSH concentrations decreased by 12h after oestradiol treatment in all groups (P < 0.0001), reached a nadir at 24h, and increased by 60 h in all groups; plasma FSH reached higher (P < 0.02) concentrations in E-17beta-treated than in EB- or EV-treated cows. In Experiment 2, non-lactating Hereford cows (n = 29) received a new CIDR on Day 0 (beginning of the experiment), and were assigned randomly to receive 1 or 5mg of E-17beta or EB i.m. on Day 1. On Day 8, CIDR were removed and PGF was given. Transrectal ultrasonography was done once daily from 2 days before CIDR insertion to 2 days after CIDR removal, and then twice-daily to ovulation. Although there was no difference among groups in the interval from oestradiol treatment to follicular wave emergence (4.2 +/- 0.3 days; P = 0.5), 5mg of E-17beta resulted in the least variable interval to wave emergence (P < 0.005), compared with the other treatment groups which were not different (P = 0.1). For the interval from CIDR removal to ovulation, there were no differences among groups for either means (P = 0.5) or variances (P = 0.1). In Experiment 3, beef heifers (n = 32) received a once-used CIDR on Day 0 (beginning of the experiment) plus 100mg progesterone i.m. and were assigned randomly to receive 5mg E-17beta or 1mg EB i.m. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and all heifers received PGF. On Day 8 (24h after CIDR removal), each group was subdivided randomly to receive 1mg of either E-17beta or EB i.m. There was no effect of oestradiol formulation on interval from treatment to follicular wave emergence (4.1 +/- 0.2 days; P = 0.7) or on the median interval (76.6h; P = 0.7) or range (72-120 h; P = 0.08) from CIDR removal to ovulation. In summary, oestradiol treatments suppressed FSH in ovariectomised cows, with the duration of suppression dependent on the oestradiol formulation. Both E-17beta and EB effectively synchronised ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in CIDR-treated cattle, and the interval from CIDR removal to ovulation did not differ in heifers given either E-17beta or EB 24h after CIDR removal.  相似文献   

8.
The objective was to compare pregnancy rates following fixed-time AI (FTAI) in beef cattle given a new or previously used CIDR insert and injections of estradiol, with or without progesterone, to synchronize follicular wave emergence. In Experiment 1, heifers (n=616) received a new or once-used CIDR insert for 9 days and were given 1mg estradiol cypionate (ECP), with or without 100 mg of a commercial progesterone preparation (CP4), at CIDR insertion. Heifers were treated with PGF at CIDR removal and 0.5 mg ECP i.m. 24h later, with FTAI 55 to 60 h after CIDR removal. Pregnancy rate was not affected by either the number of CIDR uses (P=0.59; 48.3% versus 46.2% for new versus once-used CIDRs, respectively) or the addition of progesterone (P=0.42; 45.6% versus 48.8% for ECP+CP4 and ECP, respectively). In Experiment 2 (replicated at two locations), heifers (n=56) and lactating beef cows (n=307) received a once- or twice-used CIDR and an i.m. injection of 1mg estradiol benzoate (EB), with or without 100 mg progesterone, at CIDR insertion. Cattle received PGF in the ischiorectal fossa at CIDR removal (Day 7) and 1mg EB i.m. 24h later, with FTAI 52 to 56 h after CIDR removal. Pregnancy rate was affected by location (P<0.002; 46.0% versus 61.1% for Locations A and B, respectively), parity (P<0.04; 67.9% versus 53.1% in heifers and cows, respectively), and numbers of times the CIDR had been used (P<0.03; 62.4% versus 48.4% for once- and twice-used CIDRs, respectively). However, the addition of progesterone to the injection of EB at CIDR insertion did not affect pregnancy rate (P=0.6). In Experiment 3, heifers (n=187) received one new, one once-used, one twice-used or two twice-used CIDRs for 7 days and 2 mg EB plus 50 mg of CP4 at the time of CIDR insertion. Heifers were treated with PGF at CIDR removal and 1mg EB i.m. 24 h later, with FTAI 52-56 h after CIDR removal. Pregnancy rate was not affected by treatments (P=0.28, 57.5, 63.8, 47.9, 47.9% for one new, one once-used, one twice-used, or two twice-used CIDRs, respectively). In summary, pregnancy rate to FTAI did not differ between cattle synchronized with a new or once-used CIDR, but pregnancy rate was lower in cattle synchronized with a twice-used CIDR; however, the insertion of two twice-used CIDRs did not affect pregnancy rates. The addition of an injection of progesterone to the estradiol treatment at CIDR insertion did not enhance pregnancy rate to FTAI.  相似文献   

9.
The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different inducers of new follicular wave emergence (FWE) and ovulation in fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) synchronization protocols using norgestomet ear implants (NORG) in Bos indicus cattle. In Experiment 1, the synchronization of FWE was evaluated when two different estradiol esters in different doses [2mg estradiol benzoate (EB), 2.5mg EV or 5mg estradiol valerate (EV)] were administered with NORG implant insertion in B. indicus cattle (estrous cyclic heifers and cows with suckling calves; n=10 per treatment). After estradiol treatment, ovarian ultrasonic exams were performed once daily to detect the interval between treatment and FWE. There were significant treatment-by-animal category interaction (P=0.05) on the interval from the estradiol treatment to FWE. An earlier (P<0.0001) and less variable (P=0.02) interval from estradiol treatment to FWE was observed in heifers treated with EB (2.5±0.2; mean±SE) than in those treated with 2.5mg EV (4.2±0.3) or 5mg EV (6.1±0.6). Cows treated with 5mg EV (4.0±0.5) had longer (P=0.05) interval than cows receiving EB (2.5±0.2), however, there was an intermediate interval in those cows treated with 2.5mg EV (3.1±0.4). In Experiment 2, the number of uses of the NORG implant (new; n=305 or previously used once; n=314) and three different ovulation induction hormones [0.5mg estradiol cypionate (EC) at implant removal (n=205), 1mg EB given 24h after implant removal (n=219), or 100μg gonadorelin (GnRH) given at FTAI (n=195)] were evaluated in Nelore heifers (2×3 factorial design). Similar pregnancy per AI (P/AI; 30 days after FTAI; P>0.05) were achieved using each of the three ovulation induction hormones (EB=40.6%; EC=48.3%, or GnRH=48.7%) and with a new (47.2%) or once-used NORG implant (44.3%). In Experiment 3, the effect of different ovulation induction hormones for FTAI [1mg EC at NORG implant removal (n=228), 10μg buserelin acetate at FTAI (GnRH; n=212) or both treatments (EC+GnRH; n=215)] on P/AI was evaluated in suckled beef cows treated with a once-used NORG implant and EB to synchronize the FWE. Similar P/AI (P=0.71) were obtained using GnRH (50.9%), EC (51.8%) or both treatments (54.9%) as ovulation induction hormones. Therefore, both doses of EV (2.5 or 5.0mg) with NORG implant delayed and increased the variation of the day of new FWE compared with EB in B. indicus cattle. These effects were more pronounced in B. indicus heifers than cows. Synchronization protocols for FTAI with either a new or once-used NORG implant with EB at insertion to induce a new FWE and either the use of EB, EC or GnRH as ovulation induction hormones may be successful in B. indicus heifers. Also, when a once-used NORG implant was used, either the administration of EC, GnRH or both as ovulation inducers resulted in similar P/AI in suckled B. indicus cows, showing no additive effect of the combination of both ovulation induction hormones.  相似文献   

10.
We evaluated the efficiency of replacing GnRH with LH in the ovulation synchronization protocol in buffaloes. Buffaloes received GnRH on Day 0, (Buserelin; Conceptal, 20 microg), PGF2alpha (Luprostiol; Prosolvin, 15 mg) on Day 7 and GnRH (Buserelin; Conceptal, 10 microg; Group 1) or porcine LH (LH; Lutropin-V, 12.5 mg; Group 2) on Day 9. In Experiment 1, we studied the follicular dynamics of 30 buffaloes (Group 1, n = 15 and Group 2, n = 15). We performed ultrasonography every 12 h from Days 0 to 2, then on Day 7 and then every 6 h from the time of GnRH or LH treatment (Day 9) until the time of ovulation. All females not ovulating by 48 h after the second GnRH or LH injection were considered as nonresponders. In Experiment 2, we evaluated 305 buffaloes (Group 1, n = 154; Group 2, n = 151), using the same two treatments studied in Experiment 1. We also recorded and evaluated aspects like parity, lactational status, the presence of mucus, and uterine tone at the time of artificial insemination (Al). In Experiment 1, ovulation rate after the first GnRH was 86.6% (26/30). Ovulation rates were 93.3% (14/15; Group 1) after the second dose of GnRH and 93.3% (14/15) after LH (Group 2). Ovulation occurred 36.4+/-10.4 h after the first GnRH. The interval for treatment to ovulation was 26.5+/-9.6 h for buffaloes treated with GnRH (Group 1) and 24.4+/-7.9 h for buffaloes treated with LH (Group 2); the time of ovulation did not differ statistically between the two groups (GnRH versus LH; P > 0.05). In Experiment 2, conception rates of the animals AI in the field were 56.5% (Group 1) and 64.2% (Group 2), respectively (P = 0.08). The response to the treatment with LH was not different to the treatment with GnRH; however, multiparous buffaloes had higher conception rates than the primiparous buffaloes in both groups (P > 0.05). Buffaloes with mucus at the time of AI in Group 2 had higher conception rates than the buffaloes that had mucus in Group 1 (P < 0.05). Uterine tone and lactational status did not influence conception rates (P > 0.05). In summary, the results showed that both treatments resulted in synchronization of ovulation and acceptable conception rates. Therefore, the exogenous injection of LH can substitute the GnRH injections in the Ovsynch program in buffaloes.  相似文献   

11.
Four experiments were conducted to investigate modifications to gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH)-based fixed-time Al protocols in beef cattle. In Experiment 1, the effect of reducing the interval from GnRH treatment to prostaglandin (PGF) was examined. Lactating beef cows (n = 111) were given 100 mg gonadorelin (GnRH) on Day 0 (start of treatment) and either 500 microg cloprostenol (PGF) on Day 6 with Al and 100 microg GnRH 60 h later, or PGF on Day 7 with Al and GnRH 48 h later (6- or 7-day Co-Synch regimens). Pregnancy rates were 32/61 (53.3%) versus 26/50 (52.0%), respectively (P = 0.96). In Experiment 2. cattle (n = 196) were synchronized with a 7-day Co-Synch regimen and received either no further treatment or a CIDR-B device (Days 0-7). Pregnancy rates were 32/71 (45.1%) versus 33/77 (42.9%) in cows (P < 0.8), and 9/23 (39.1 %) versus 17/25 (68.0%) in heifers (P < 0.05). In Experiment 3, 49 beef heifers were randomly assigned to receive 12.5 mg pLH on Day 0, PGF on Day 7 and 12.5 mg of pLH on Day 9 with Al 12 h later (pLH Ovsynch), or similar treatment plus a CIDR-B device from Days 0 to 7 (pLH Ovsynch + CIDR-B), or 1 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and 100 mg progesterone on Day 0, a CIDR-B device from Days 0 to 7 (EB/ P4 + CIDR-B), PGF on Day 7 (at the time of CIDR-B removal) and 1 mg i.m. EB on Day 8 with AI on Day 9 (52 h after PGF). Pregnancy rate in the EB/P4 + CIDR-B group (75.0%) was higher (P < 0.04) than in the pLH Ovsynch group (37.5%): the pLH Ovsynch + CIDR-B group was intermediate (64.7%). In Experiment 4, 266 non-lactating cows were allocated to a 7-day Co-Synch protocol (Co-Synch), a 7-day Co-Synch plus 0.6 mg per head per day melengestrol acetate (MGA) from Days 0 to 6 inclusive (Co-Synch + MGA) or MGA (Days 0-6) plus 2 mg EB and 50 mg progesterone on Day 0. 500 microg PGF on Day 7, 1 mg EB on Day 8 and fixed-time Al 28 h later (EB/ P4 + MGA). Pregnancy rates (P < 0.25) were 44.8% (39/87: Co-Synch), 47.8% (43/90; Co-Synch + MGA), and 60.7% (54/89: EB/P4 + MGA). In conclusion, a 6- or 7-day interval from GnRH to PGF in a Co-Synch regimen resulted in similar pregnancy rates in cows. The addition of a progestin to a Co-Synch or Ovsynch regimen significantly improved pregnancy rates in heifers but not in cows. Progestin-based regimens that included EB consistently resulted in high pregnancy rates to fixed-time Al.  相似文献   

12.
A new protocol for superovulating cattle which allows for control of the timing of ovulation after superstimulation with FSH was developed. The preovulatory LH surge was blocked with the GnRH agonist deslorelin, and ovulation was induced by injection of LH. In Experiment 1, heifers (3-yr-old) were assigned to a control group (Group 1A, n = 4) or a group with deslorelin implants (Group 1B, n = 5). On Day -7, heifers in Group 1A received a progestagen CIDR-B((R))device, while heifers in Group 1B received a CIDR-B((R))device + deslorelin implants. Both groups were superstimulated with twice daily injections of FSH (Folltropin((R))-V): Day 0, 40 mg (80 mg total dose on Day 0); Day 1, 30 mg; Day 2, 20 mg; Day 3, 10 mg. On Day 2, heifers were given PGF (a.m.) and CIDR-B((R)) devices were removed (p.m.). Three heifers in Group 1A had a LH surge and ovulated, whereas neither of these events occurred in Group 1B (with deslorelin implants) heifers. In Experiment 2, heifers (3-yr-old) were assigned to 1 of 4 equal groups (n = 6). On Day -7, heifers in Group 2A received a norgestomet implant, while heifers in Groups 2B, 2C and 2D received norgestomet + deslorelin implants. Heifers were superstimulated with FSH starting on Day 0 as in Experiment 1. On Day 2, heifers were given PGF (a.m.) and norgestomet implants were removed (p.m.). Heifers in Groups 2B to 2D were given 25 mg LH (Lutropin((R))): Group 2B, Day 4 (a.m.); Group 2C, Day 4 (p.m.); Group 2D, Day 5 (a.m.). Heifers in Group 2A were inseminated at estrus and 12 and 24 h later, while heifers in Groups 2B to 2D were inseminated at the time of respective LH injection and 12 and 24 h later. Injection of LH induced ovulation in heifers in Groups 2B to 2D. Heifers in Group 2C had similar total ova and embryos (15.2 +/- 1.4) as heifers in Group 2A (11.0 +/- 2.8) but greater (P < 0.05) numbers than heifers in Group 2B (7.0 +/- 2.3) and Group 2D (6.3 +/- 2.0). The number of transferable embryos was similar for heifers in Group 2A (5.8 +/- 1.8) and Group 2C (7.3 +/- 2.1) but lower (P < 0.05) for heifers in Group 2B (1.2 +/- 0.8) and Group 2D (1.3 +/- 1.0). The new GnRH agonist-LH protocol does not require observation of estrus, and induces ovulation in superstimulated heifers that would not have an endogenous LH surge.  相似文献   

13.
The objectives were to determine pregnancy rates following fixed-time AI (FTAI) in heifers: (1). given GnRH or estradiol cypionate (ECP) to synchronize follicular wave emergence and ovulation in a CIDR-based protocol; and (2). fed diets supplemented with flax or sunflower seeds. At two locations, Angus and crossbred Angus heifers (n=983) were examined ultrasonically to confirm reproductive maturity and randomly allocated to six synchronization groups in a 2 x 3 factorial design. On Day 0 (start of synchronization treatments), heifers received a CIDR and either 100 microg GnRH i.m. (n=492) or 1mg ECP plus 50 mg progesterone i.m. (n=491); in these groups, CIDR removal and PGF treatment were done concurrently on Days 7 and 8.5, respectively. Heifers were re-randomized to receive 0.5 mg ECP i.m. at CIDR removal or 24 h later (with FTAI 58-60 h after CIDR removal in both groups), or 100 microg GnRH i.m. concurrent with FTAI (52-54 h after CIDR removal). The heifers were fed a barley silage-based diet for 50 days (from Day -25 to 25) supplemented with 1kg/heifer per day of flax seed (n=321), sunflower seed (n=324), or no oilseed (n=338). Pregnancy rate to FTAI (overall, 56.2%) was not affected by treatment at CIDR insertion (P = 0.96) but was higher (P < 0.05) in heifers given ECP 24h after CIDR removal (216/330, 65.4%) than in those given either ECP at CIDR removal (168/322, 52.1%) or GnRH at AI (169/331, 51.1%). Overall, there was no effect of diet on pregnancy rates (P = 0.46). In summary, pregnancy rate to FTAI was not significantly affected by treatment at CIDR insertion to synchronize follicular wave emergence, but 0.5mg ECP 24h after CIDR removal (to synchronize ovulation) resulted in the highest pregnancy rate.  相似文献   

14.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of delaying ovulation subsequent to superstimulation of follicular growth in beef cows (Bos indicus) on embryo recovery rates and the capacity of embryos to establish pregnancies. Ovulation was delayed by three treatments using either progesterone (CIDR-B) or a GnRH agonist (deslorelin). Multiparous Nelore cows (n = 24) received three of four superstimulation treatments in an incomplete block design (n = 18 per group). Cows in Groups CTRL, P48 and P60 were treated with a CIDR-B device plus estradiol benzoate (EB, 4 mg, i.m.) on Day-5, while cows in Group D60 were implanted with deslorelin on Day-7. Cows were superstimulated with FSH (Folltropin-V, 200 mg), from Day 0 to 3, using twice daily injections in decreasing amounts. All cows were treated with a luteolytic dose of prostaglandin on Day 2 (08:00 h). CIDR-B devices were removed as follows: Group CTRL, Day 2 (20:00 h); Group P48, Day 4 (08:00 h); Group P60, Day 4 (20:00 h). Cows in Group CTRL were inseminated at 10, 20 and 30 h after first detected estrus. Ovulation was induced for cows in Group P48 (Day 4, 08:00 h) and Groups P60 and D60 (Day 4, 20:00 h) by injection of LH (Lutropin, 25 mg, i.m.), and these cows were inseminated 10 and 20 h after treatment with LH. Embryos were recovered on Days 11 or 12, graded and transferred to synchronized recipients. Pregnancies were determined by ultrasonography around Day 100. Data were analyzed by mixed procedure, Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square tests. The number of ova/embryos, transferable embryos (mean +/- SEM) and pregnancy rates (%) were as follows, respectively: Group CTRL (10.8+/-1.8, 6.1+/-1.3, 51.5), P48 (12.6+/-1.9, 7.1+/-1.0, 52.3), P60 (10.5+/-1.6, 5.7+/-1.3, 40.0) and D60 (10.3+/-1.7, 5.0+/-1.2, 50.0). There were no significant differences among the groups (P > 0.05). It was concluded that fixed time AI in association with induced ovulation did not influence embryo recovery. Furthermore, pregnancy rates in embryos recovered from cows with delayed ovulation were similar to those in embryos obtained from cows treated with a conventional superstimulation protocol.  相似文献   

15.
Two experiments were designed to evaluate the effects of treatments with low versus high serum progesterone (P4) concentrations on factors associated with pregnancy success in postpubertal Nellore heifers submitted to either conventional or fixed timed artificial insemination (FTAI). Heifers were synchronized with a new controlled internal drug release device (CIDR; 1.9 g of P4 [CIDR1]) or a CIDR previously used for 18 days (CIDR3) plus 2 mg of estradiol (E2) benzoate on Day 0 and 12.5 mg of prostaglandin F2α on Day 7. In experiment 1 (n = 723), CIDR were removed on Day 7 or 9 and heifers were inseminated after estrus detection. In experiment 2 (n = 1083), CIDR were all removed on Day 9 and FTAI was performed either 48 hours later in heifers that received E2 cypionate (ECP) on Day 9 (0.5 mg; E48) or 54 or 72 hours later in conjunction with administration of GnRH (100 μg; G54 or G72). Synchronization with CIDR1 resulted in greater serum P4 concentrations and smaller follicle diameters on Days 7 and 9 in both experiments. In experiment 1, treatment with CIDR for 9 days decreased the interval from CIDR removal to estrus (Day 7, 3.76 ± 0.08 days vs. Day 9, 2.90 ± 0.07; P < 0.01) and improved conception (Day 7, 57.1% vs. Day 9, 65.8%; P = 0.05) and pregnancy rates (Day 7, 37.6% vs. Day 9, 45.3%; P = 0.04). In experiment 2, treatment with ECP improved (P < 0.01) the proportion of heifers in estrus (E48, 40.9%a; G54, 17.1%c; and G72, 32.0%b), but the pregnancy rate was not affected (P = 0.64) by treatments (E48, 38.8%; G54, 35.5%; G72, 37.5%). Synchronization with CIDR3 increased follicle diameter at FTAI (CIDR1, 11.07 ± 0.10 vs. CIDR3, 11.61 ± 0.10 mm; P < 0.01), ovulation rate (CIDR1, 82.8% vs. CIDR3, 88.0%; P < 0.01) and did not affect conception (CIDR1, 42.2 vs. CIDR3, 45.1%; P = 0.38) or pregnancy rates (CIDR1, 34.7 vs. CIDR3, 39.4%; P = 0.11). In conclusion, length of treatment with P4 affected the fertility of heifers bred based on estrus detection. When the heifers were submitted to FTAI protocol, follicle diameter at FTAI (≤10.7 mm, 23.6%; 10.8–15.7 mm, 51.5%; ≥15.8 mm, 30.0%; P < 0.01) was the main factor that affected conception and pregnancy rates.  相似文献   

16.
The objective was to investigate ovarian follicular development and hormone concentrations in previously inseminated cows with estrous cycles resynchronized with various resynchronization treatments. Lactating dairy cows were treated with a previously used intravaginal progesterone releasing device (IVD) for 7d (EB+IVD 7+EB, n=15) or 8d (EB+IVD 8+EB, n=16), starting 13d (Day 13) after a first estrus (Day 0) and AI. Estradiol benzoate (EB; 1mgim) was given at device insertion and 24h after removal. Other cows were given the same treatment as the EB+IVD 8+EB cows, but were not treated with EB at IVD insertion (IVD 8+EB, n=11). There were no differences (P>0.05) between EB+IVD 7+EB and EB+IVD 8+EB treatments for follicle dynamics and plasma progesterone concentrations during treatment. Based on a comparison between the IVD 8+EB treated cows and the pooled results of the EB+IVD 7+EB and EB+IVD 8+EB treated cows, EB at device insertion increased the number of follicular waves between Days 13 and 20 (mean+/-S.E.M.; 2.3+/-0.14 vs 2.7+/-0.10, P=0.033), delayed emergence of follicles that were dominant or emerging on Day 20 (17.2+/-0.36 vs 14.1+/-0.65d, P<0.001), reduced diameters of dominant or emerging follicles on Day 20 (9.0+/-0.58 vs 12.7+/-0.59, P<0.001), and reduced plasma progesterone concentrations by 0.85+/-0.44ng/mL (P=0.059) during treatment. Furthermore, comparison of the IVD 8+EB to the EB+IVD 8+EB treated cows demonstrated that treatment with EB at device insertion also reduced the diameter of ovulatory follicles (14.2+/-0.58 vs 19.0+/-0.71mm, P=0.001), delayed emergence of ovulatory follicles (17.0+/-0.32 vs 13.5+/-1.26, P=0.020), and reduced the interval from emergence to ovulation (7.0+/-0.32 vs 10.5+/-1.26d, P=0.020). We concluded that administration of EB altered ovarian follicular dynamics and tended to reduce plasma progesterone concentrations during treatment with an IVD that was used to resynchronize estrous cycles. However, use of a 7-d compared to an 8-day treatment with an IVD did not significantly affect follicle dynamics nor plasma progesterone concentrations during treatment.  相似文献   

17.
The objective was to evaluate the effects of temporary calf removal (TCR), eCG administration, or both, in a progesterone-based protocol. Suckled Nellore cows (40-80 d postpartum, n=443) with body condition scores from 2.0 to 3.5 (5-point scale) on three farms were all given a synchronizing protocol (PEPE). At the start (designated Day 0), cows were given an intravaginal device (1.0 g of progesterone) and 2.5mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) im. On Day 8, the device was removed and cows were given PGF(2 alpha) (150 microg of D-cloprostenol im), followed in 24h by 1.0mg EB im, and 30-36 h thereafter, fixed-time AI. The design was a 2 x 2 factorial; main effects were TCR (54-60 h; from device removal to FTAI) and eCG treatment (300 IU im, concurrent with PGF(2 alpha)). Transrectal ultrasonography was done on Days -10 and 0 to detect anestrus (absence of a CL at both examinations) and approximately 30 d after FTAI (pregnancy diagnosis). Data were analyzed by logistic regression. The following variables did not significantly affect pregnancy rates: farm, postpartum interval, cyclicity, inseminators, and semen (sire). Overall, 77% of the cows were deemed anestrus. Pregnancy rates were similar (P>0.05) among treatment groups: Control (54/108=50.0%), TCR (44/106=41.5%), eCG (63/116=54.3%), and TCR+eCG (49/113=43.4%). Pregnancy rate was higher in multiparous than primiparous cows (186/360, 51.7% vs. 24/83, 28.9%, P<0.01), but was not significantly affected by cyclicity status or body condition score. In conclusion, temporary calf removal, eCG, or both, did not significantly increase pregnancy rate to timed-insemination in a progesterone-based synchronization protocol in postpartum Nellore cows with acceptable body condition.  相似文献   

18.
Nine heifers were pre-synchronized (PGF2α, 12 days) and assigned into three groups with 6 repetitions each: (1) CL (~8 days old, n=13); (2) DIB+CL (n=18); (3) DIB+EB (150 μg of PGF2α and 2mg estradiol benzoate, n=18). After progesterone (P4) device removal (8 days) and/or final PGF2α, heifers were injected with either GnRH or EB in a 3×2 factorial totalling 49 observations (5 were excluded). The blood sampling schedule: every 12 h during P4 period; for LH pulse frequency on Days 3-5, every 15 min for 6 h during P4 period; after P4 removal and EB treatment, samples were collected every 3 h for 24 h or after GnRH every 1 h for 10 h. Ovarian follicle number and diameter were evaluated by ultrasonography every 12 h until the last blood sample and then 24 h and 48 h later. After device insertion (12 h), the DIB+CL group had a lesser LH concentration than the DIB+EB group. After 36 h, all DIB+CL-treated heifers had less LH than CL-heifers, and after 60 h, the DIB+EB group had less LH than the CL-group. Considering all P4 groups combined, LH peak amplitude was greater after GnRH compared to EB treatment but total area of LH peak amplitude and time to first peak was less. The CL-group had fewer follicles and a greater largest follicle diameter than DIB+CL and DIB+EB groups. When treated with EB, the DIB+CL group had a lesser ovulation rate at 24 h than the CL- and DIB+EB-groups. Fixed time artificial insemination (FTAI) protocols promoted a pre-ovulatory LH peak, independent of previous exposure to the DIB coupled with a CL or not. The progesterone excess interfered with FSH and LH secretion, follicular development and ovulation within 24 h.  相似文献   

19.
An experiment was designed to evaluate a) the effect of a progesterone-estradiol combined treatment on ovarian follicular dynamics in postpartum beef cows, and b) ovulation and the subsequent luteal activity after short-term calf removal and GnRH agonist treatment. Multiparous Angus cows (25 to 40 d after calving) were assigned to the following treatments: untreated (Control, n = 9); short term calf removal (CR, n = 8); progesterone (CIDR, n = 9) and progesterone plus estradiol-17 beta (CIDR + E-17 beta, n = 9). Progesterone treatment (CIDR) lasted 8 d and the day of device insertion was considered as Day 0. Cows in the CIDR + E-17 beta group also received an i.m. injection of 5 mg of E-17 beta on Day 1. On Day 8, calves were removed for 48 h (CR, CIDR and CIDR + E-17 beta groups) and 6 h before the end of calf removal these cows also received an i.m. injection of 8 micrograms of Busereline (GnRH). Anestrus was confirmed in all cows by the absence of luteal tissue and progesterone concentrations below 1 ng ml-1 at the beginning of the experiment. Although mean (+/- SEM) interval from the beginning of the experiment (Day 0) to wave emergence did not differ (P > 0.05) among treatment groups (Control, 1.9 +/- 1.0, range -2 to 7 d; CR, 3.9 +/- 0.7, range 0 to 6 d; CIDR, 2.8 +/- 0.5, range 0 to 4 d and CIDR + E-17 beta, 4.1 +/- 0.2, range 3 to 5), the variability was less (P < 0.05) in the CIDR + E-17 beta group. The proportion of cows ovulating 24 to 48 h after GnRH administration tended (P = 0.08) to be higher in cows from CIDR + E-17 beta group (8/9) than in those of CR (5/8) or CIDR (6/9) groups, respectively and was associated with a higher proportion (P < 0.05) of CIDR + E-17 beta treated cows (9/9) that had a dominant follicle in the growing/early static phase at the time of GnRH treatment compared to the other GnRH treated groups (5/8, and 4/9 for CR and CIDR groups, respectively). Two CR cows ovulated 0-24 h after GnRH and only one Control cow ovulated the day before the time of GnRH administration. Cows pretreated with progesterone had longer (P < 0.05) luteal lifespan (CIDR, 14.5 +/- 0.7, CIDR + E-17 beta, 13.9 +/- 0.6 d) than those not treated with CIDR (Control, 5, CR, 4.0 +/- 0.4). We conclude that progesterone plus estradiol treatment results in tightly synchronized wave emergence and high GnRH-induced ovulation rate with normal luteal activity in postpartum beef cattle.  相似文献   

20.
The overall objective was to compare the efficacy of GnRH, porcine LH (pLH) and estradiol cypionate (ECP), in a modified Ovsynch/fixed-time AI (FTAI) protocol that included a controlled internal drug [progesterone] release (CIDR) device. In Experiment 1, heifers received a CIDR on Day -10, and PGF (25mg) on Day -3. At CIDR insertion, heifers received 100 microg of GnRH (n=6), 0.5mg of ECP (n=6), 5.0mg of pLH (n=6) or 2 mL of saline (n=7); these treatments were repeated on Day -1, except for ECP, that was repeated on Day -2, concurrent with CIDR-removal. The 5.0 mg pLH was the least effective with a longer interval to ovulation than the other groups combined (102 versus 64 h; P<0.05). Overall mean LH concentrations (1.6 ng/mL) and area under the curve (AUC) did not differ among treatments, but mean peak LH concentration was lower in heifers given 5 mg of pLH compared to all other groups (4.5 versus 10.3 ng/mL; P<0.05). In Experiment 2, heifers on CIDR-based Ovsynch protocols were given 12.5mg pLH (n=6; pLH-low), 25.0 mg pLH (n=6, pLH-high), or 100 microg GnRH (n=5; control). Heifers in the pLH-high group had greater (P<0.01) plasma LH concentrations (between 12 and 20 h) than GnRH-treated heifers, but the pLH treatments did not differ (P>0.10). Area under the curve for LH (ng/32 h) was at least 50% greater (P<0.01) in pLH-treated heifers compared to GnRH-treated heifers (mean, 41.3, 56.3 and 20.3 for pLH-low, pLH-high and GnRH, respectively). Ovulation occurred in 15 of 17 heifers. Progesterone concentrations were higher on Days 9 and 14 in heifers given 25mg of pLH, suggesting enhanced CL function. In Experiment 3, 240 heifers were assigned to CIDR-based Ovsynch/FTAI protocols. The first and second hormonal treatments (with an intervening PGF treatment on Day -3) were GnRH/GnRH (100 microg), ECP/ECP (0.5 mg), pLH/pLH (12.5 mg) or GnRH/ECP, respectively; pregnancy rates were 58.7, 66.1, 45.9 and 48.3%, respectively (ECP/ECP>both pLH/pLH and GnRH/ECP; P相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号