Transforming growth factor beta 1 and androgen receptors in prostate neoplasia

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the interplay between transforming growth factor (TGF) beta 1, androgen receptors and stromal-epithelial interactions in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and prostate carcinoma areas of prostate neoplasia. STUDY DESIGN: In this immunohistochemical study we investigated staining patterns and then determined the correlation between TGF-beta 1 expression and androgen receptor status in the epithelium and stroma of 60 paraffin-embedded tissues from radical prostatectomies. RESULTS: Staining patterns differed in the epithelium and stroma of tumor and peritumor prostatic tissue. TGF-beta 1 immunostaining (H-scores) in the epithelium and stroma increased significantly from BPH to PIN and from BPH to prostate carcinoma in the epithelium (P < .05), whereas androgen receptor (AR) immunoreactivity significantly (P < .05) increased from BPH to PIN to prostatic carcinoma in epithelium and stroma. TGF-beta 1 did not correlate with histologic grade of differentiation, whereas AR proteins were more strongly expressed in Gleason score 5 and 6 than score 7 tumors (P < .05). Nonlinear regression showed a significant correlation (P < .01) between TGF-beta 1 and AR expression only in the stromal compartment of PIN. CONCLUSION: These findings argue in favor of an interaction between TGF-beta 1 and AR in the early stages of prostate carcinogenesis and suggest that TGF-beta 1 plays a central role in stromal-epithelial interactions during the early stages of malignant transformation.     

Interleukin-6 is a potent inducer of S100P, which is up-regulated in androgen-refractory and metastatic prostate cancer

Elevated circulating interleukin-6 (IL6) and up-regulated S100P in prostate cancer (PCa) specimens correlate independently with progression to androgen-independent and metastatic PCa. The cause of up-regulated S100P levels in advanced PCa remains to be determined. We investigated the possibility that IL6 is an inducer of S100P. Determination of mRNA and protein levels by real-time PCR and Western blotting revealed that IL6 is a more potent inducer of S100P than the synthetic androgen, R1881, in the LNCaP/C4-2B model of PCa progression. IL6 did not require androgen to induce S100P in these cells, which express a functional androgen receptor (AR). Like R1881, IL6 was unable to induce S100P in PC3 cells that lack a functional AR. IL6 did not strongly induce the AR-dependent genes PSA and KLK2 and, contrary to R1881, down-regulated Cyr61/CCN1, a potential marker that is down-regulated in PCa. Epidermal growth factor (EGF), which like IL6 is a non-androgen activator of the AR, did not induce S100P. The data identifies a unique gene-induction profile for IL6 and suggests that IL6 may require a functional AR for S100P induction. A link between elevated IL6 and up-regulated S100P in androgen-refractory and metastatic PCa is postulated.     

Androgen receptor regulation of the versican gene through an androgen response element in the proximal promoter

Versican, one of the key components of prostatic stroma, plays a central role in tumor initiation and progression. Here, we investigated promoter elements and mechanisms of androgen receptor (AR)-mediated regulation of the versican gene in prostate cancer cells. Using transient transfection assays in prostate cancer LNCaP and cervical cancer HeLa cells engineered to express the AR, we demonstrate that the synthetic androgen R1881 and dihydrotestosterone stimulate expression of a versican promoter-driven luciferase reporter vector (versican-Luc). Further, both basal and androgen-stimulated versican-Luc activities were significantly diminished in LNCaP cells, when AR gene expression was knocked down using a short hairpin RNA. Methylation-protection footprinting analysis revealed an AR-protected element between positions +75 and +102 of the proximal versican promoter, which strongly resembled a consensus steroid receptor element. Electrophoretic mobility shift and supershift assays revealed strong and specific binding of the recombinant AR DNA binding domain to oligonucleotides corresponding to this protected DNA sequence. Site-directed mutagenesis of the steroid receptor element site markedly diminished R1881-stimulated versican-Luc activity. In contrast to the response seen using LNCaP cells, R1881 did not significantly induce versican promoter activity and mRNA levels in AR-positive prostate stromal fibroblasts. Interestingly, overexpression of beta-catenin in the presence of androgen augmented versican promoter activity 10- and 30-fold and enhanced versican mRNA levels 2.8-fold in fibroblasts. In conclusion, we demonstrate that AR transactivates versican expression, which may augment tumor-stromal interactions and may contribute to prostate cancer progression.     

Human prostate stromal cells stimulate increased PSA production in DHEA-treated prostate cancer epithelial cells

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is commonly used as a dietary supplement and may affect prostate pathophysiology when metabolized to androgens and/or estrogens. Human prostate LAPC-4 cancer cells with a wild type androgen receptor (AR) were treated with DHEA, androgens dihydrotestosterone (DHT), T, or R1881), and E(2) and assayed for prostate specific antigen (PSA) protein and gene expression. In LAPC-4 monocultures, DHEA and E(2) induced little or no increase in PSA protein or mRNA expression compared to androgen-treated cells. When prostate cancer-associated (6S) stromal cells were added in coculture, DHEA stimulated LAPC-4 cell PSA protein secretion to levels approaching induction by DHT. Also, DHEA induced 15-fold more PSA mRNA in LAPC-4 cocultures than in monocultures. LAPC-4 proliferation was increased 2-3-fold when cocultured with 6S stromal cells regardless of hormone treatment. DHEA-treated 6S stromal cells exhibited a dose- and time-dependent increase in T secretion, demonstrating stromal cell metabolism of DHEA to T. Coculture with non-cancerous stroma did not induce LAPC-4 PSA production, suggesting a differential modulation of DHEA effect in a cancer-associated prostate stromal environment. This coculture model provides a research approach to reveal detailed endocrine, intracrine, and paracrine signaling between stromal and epithelial cells that regulate tissue homeostasis within the prostate, and the role of the tumor microenvironment in cancer progression.     

The EPI bioassay identifies natural compounds with estrogenic activity that are potent inhibitors of androgenic pathways in human prostate stromal and epithelial cells

The reactive stromal phenotype is an important factor for prostate cancer progression and may be a new target for treatment and prevention. A new high efficiency preclinical protocol, the EPI bioassay, reflects the interaction of endocrine, paracrine and immune, (EPI) factors on induced androgen metabolism in human prostate reactive stroma. The bioassay is based on co-culturing human primary prostate stromal cells and LAPC-4 prostatic adenocarcinoma cells in a downscaled format of 96-well-plates for testing multiple doses of multiple target compounds. Metabolism of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) with or without TGFβ1-induced stimulation (D+T) of the reactive stroma phenotype was assessed by increased testosterone in the media and PSA production of the epithelial prostate cancer cells. Using the non-metabolizable androgen R1881, effects from direct androgen action were distinguished from stromal androgen production from DHEA. Stromal cell androgenic bioactivity was confirmed using conditioned media from D+T-treated stromal cell monocultures in an androgen-inducible AR screening assay. We further showed that both agonists to estrogen receptor (ER), DPN (ERβ) and PPT (ERα), as well as estrogenic natural compounds including soy isoflavones attenuated D+T-induced PSA production. Studies with the pure ER agonists showed that activating either ERα or ERβ could inhibit both D+T-mediated and R1881-mediated PSA production with the D+T effect being more pronounced. In conclusion, natural compounds with estrogenic activity and pure ER agonists are very potent inhibitors of stromal conversion of DHEA to androgenic metabolites. More studies are needed to characterize the mechanisms involved in estrogenic modulation of the endocrine-immune-paracrine balance of the prostate microenvironment.     

Autologous down-regulation of androgen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid

Autoregulation of androgen receptor (AR) mRNA was investigated using Northern blot analysis with AR cDNA fragments as probes. The amount of AR mRNA increased 2- to 10-fold with androgen withdrawal and decreased below control levels after androgen stimulation in rat ventral prostate, coagulating gland, epididymis, seminal vesicle, kidney, and brain, and in a human prostate cancer cell line, LNCaP. In rat ventral prostate, AR mRNA increased 2- to 3-fold within 24 h after castration and remained elevated for 4 days. Treatment with testosterone propionate beginning 24 h after castration reduced ventral prostate AR mRNA 4-fold within 8 h of androgen replacement. Administration of estradiol 24 h after castration had no significant effect on prostatic AR mRNA. Androgens, including testosterone and the synthetic androgen methyltrienolone (R1881), or the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate down-regulated AR mRNA in vitro in LNCaP cells, whereas estradiol was without effect. Administration of testosterone propionate to rats with androgen insensitivity did not decrease AR mRNA. Down-regulation of AR mRNA by androgen is therefore a receptor-mediated process which occurs in vivo in rat tissues that differ in androgen responsiveness and in cultured human prostate cells.     

Inhibition of growth and induction of apoptosis by androgens of a variant of LNCaP cell line

Here are described the effects of androgens, and other molecules known to bind to androgen receptors (AR), on MOP cells established from the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP. MOP cells contained AR: 100 000 binding sites/cell, K_D for 5 dihydrotestosterone (DHT) 0.5 nM, size 110 kDa. The AR gene has the same repetition polymorphism in exon 1 and the T876A mutation in exon 8 as LNCaP. The proliferation of MOP cells in culture was repressed by the synthetic androgen 17β-hydroxy-17-methyl-estra-4,9,11-trien-3-one (R 1881), the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate (CYPA), estradiol (E2), progesterone and the synthetic progestin promegestone: 17,21 dimethyl-19 nor-4,9 pregnandiene-3,20 dione (R 5020). The number of cells recovered after 7 days decreased to ≈40% of controls. ED₇₀s ranged between 50 pM for R 1881 to 50 nM for E2 and CYPA. Treatment with R 1881 decreased [³H]thymidine incorporation into DNA and increased dramatically the doubling time. R 1881, CYPA and E2 blocked the cell cycle between G1 and S phases and they induced apototosis as demonstrated by the increase of blebs on the plasma membrane, nuclear fragmentation, TdT-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells and internucleosomal DNA breaks. In athymic nude mice, testosterone enanthate prevented the growth of MOP tumors and, when tumors did develop, brought about regression. However, the tumors did not regress completely and finally escaped treatment. In conclusion, a variant of the LNCaP cell line has been established. With these cells it was possible to confirm that androgens paradoxically repress the growth of some prostate cancer cells both in culture and in vivo. In addition it is demonstrated in culture but not in vivo, for the first time to the authors’ knowledge, that a synthetic androgen is able to induce apoptosis of cells established from human prostate carcinoma.     

Androgen inhibits the growth of carcinoma cell lines established from prostate cancer xenografts that escape androgen treatment

Most prostate cancers escape endocrine therapy by diverse mechanisms. One of them might be growth repression by androgen. We reported that androgen represses the growth in culture of MOP cells (a sub-line of LNCaP cells) and that of MOP cell xenografts, although tumor growth becomes androgen-independent (AI). Here we explore whether AI tumors contain androgen-responsive cells. ME carcinoma cells were established from AI tumors. The responses to androgen were examined by cell counting, DAPI labeling, flow cytometry, PSA immunoassay and tumor size follow-up. Androgen receptors (AR) were analyzed by western blotting and DNA sequencing. The pattern of responses of these cells to androgen was compared to that of MOP cells and that of JAC cells established from LNCaP-like MOP cells. R1881, a synthetic androgen: (1) repressed the growth of all the six ME cell lines obtained, MOP and JAC cells, (2) augmented the secretion of PSA, (3) induced spectacular cell bubbling/fragmentation and (4) blocked the cell cycle and induced a modest increase of apoptosis. All the androgen-repressed cells expressed the same level of mutated AR as LNCaP cells. In nude mice, the growth of ME-2 cell xenografts displayed transient androgen repression similar to that of MOP cells. In culture neither fibroblasts nor extra-cellular matrix altered the effects of R1881 on cell proliferation. These results demonstrate that androgen-independent tumors contain androgen-responsive cells. The apparent discrepancy between the responses to androgen of tumors and those of carcinoma cells in culture suggests that microenvironmental factors contribute to the androgen responsiveness of tumor cells in vivo. These modifications, albeit unspecified, could be suitable targets for restoring the androgen responsiveness of AI tumors.     

Androgen receptor action in hormone-dependent and recurrent prostate cancer

The importance of androgens and androgen receptors (AR) in primary prostate cancer is well established. Metastatic disease is usually treated with some form of androgen ablation, which is effective for a limited amount of time. The role of AR in prostate cancers that recur despite androgen ablation therapy is less certain. Most of these tumors express prostate specific antigen (PSA), an androgen-regulated gene; moreover, AR is generally highly expressed in recurrent prostate cancer. We propose that AR continues to play a role in many of these tumors and that it is not only the levels of AR, ligands, and co-regulators, but also the changes in cell signaling that induce AR action in recurrent prostate cancer. These pathways are, therefore, potential therapeutic targets.     

Quantum dots-based multiplexed immunohistochemistry of protein expression in human prostate cancer cells

Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) are bright fluorescent nanoparticles that have been successfully used for the detection of biomarker expression in cells. The objective of the present study is to use this technology in a multiplexing manner to determine at a single cell level the expression of a cell-specific bio-marker, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) expressed by human prostate cancer LNCaP and ARCaP cell lines. Here we compared the sensitivity of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and QD-based detection of AR and PSA expression in these cell lines. Further, we conducted multiplexing QD-based detection of PSA and androgen receptor (AR) expression in LNCaP cells subjecting to androgen (R1881) stimulation. The involvement of AR in PSA regulation in LNCaP cells, at a single cell level, was confirmed by the co-incubation of LNCaP cells in the presence of both R1881 and its receptor antagonist, bicalutamide (Casodex). We showed here the superior quality of QDs, in comparison to IHC, for the detection of AR and PSA in cultured LNCaP and ARCaP cells. Multiplexing QDs technique can be used to detect simultaneously AR and PSA expression induced by R1881 which promoted AR translocation from its cytosolic to the nuclear compartment. We observed AR antagonist, bicalutamide, inhibited AR nuclear translocation and PSA, but not AR expression in LNCaP cells.     

The role of androgen in determining differentiation and regulation of androgen receptor expression in the human prostatic epithelium transient amplifying population

Abnormal differentiation in epithelial stem cells or their immediate proliferative progeny, the transiently amplifying population (TAP), may explain malignant pathogenesis in the human prostate. These models are of particular importance as differing sensitivities to androgen among epithelial cell subpopulations during differentiation are recognised and may account for progression to androgen independent prostate cancer. Androgens are crucial in driving terminal differentiation and their indirect effects via growth factors from adjacent androgen responsive stroma are becoming better characterised. However, direct effects of androgen on immature cells in the context of a prostate stem cell model have not been investigated in detail and are studied in this work. In alpha2beta1hi stem cell enriched basal cells, androgen analogue R1881 directly promoted differentiation by the induction of differentiation-specific markers CK18, androgen receptor (AR), PSA and PAP. Furthermore, treatment with androgen down-regulated alpha2beta1 integrin expression, which is implicated in the maintenance of the immature basal cell phenotype. The alpha2beta1hi cells were previously demonstrated to lack AR expression and the direct effects of androgen were confirmed by inhibition using the anti-androgen bicalutamide. AR protein expression in alpha2beta1hi cells became detectable when its degradation was repressed by the proteosomal inhibitor MG132. Stratifying the alpha2beta1hi cells into stem (CD133(+)) and transient amplifying population (TAP) (CD133(-)) subpopulations, AR mRNA expression was found to be restricted to the CD133(-) (TAP) cells. The presence of a functional AR in the TAP, an androgen independent subpopulation for survival, may have particular clinical significance in hormone resistant prostate cancer, where both the selection of immature cells and functioning AR regulated pathways are involved.     

A competitive inhibitor that reduces recruitment of androgen receptor to androgen-responsive genes

The androgen receptor (AR) has a critical role in the growth and progression of androgen-dependent and castration-resistant prostate cancers. To identify novel inhibitors of AR transactivation that block growth of prostate cancer cells, a luciferase-based high-throughput screen of ~160,000 small molecules was performed in cells stably expressing AR and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-luciferase reporter. CPIC (1-(3-(2-chlorophenoxy) propyl)-1H-indole-3-carbonitrile) was identified as a small molecule that blocks AR transactivation to a greater extent than other steroid receptors. CPIC inhibited AR-mediated proliferation of androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cell lines, with minimal toxicity in AR-negative cell lines. CPIC treatment also reduced the anchorage-independent growth of LAPC-4 prostate cancer cells. CPIC functioned as a pure antagonist by inhibiting the expression of AR-regulated genes in LAPC-4 cells that express wild-type AR and exhibited weak agonist activity in LNCaP cells that express the mutant AR-T877A. CPIC treatment did not reduce AR levels or alter its nuclear localization. We used chromatin immunoprecipitation to identify the site of action of CPIC. CPIC inhibited recruitment of androgen-bound AR to the PSA promoter and enhancer sites to a greater extent than bicalutamide. CPIC is a new therapeutic inhibitor that targets AR-mediated gene activation with potential to arrest the growth of prostate cancer.     

Effects of androgen receptor and androgen on gene expression in prostate stromal fibroblasts and paracrine signaling to prostate cancer cells

The androgen receptor (AR) is expressed in a subset of prostate stromal cells and functional stromal cell AR is required for normal prostate developmental and influences the growth of prostate tumors. Although we are broadly aware of the specifics of the genomic actions of AR in prostate cancer cells, relatively little is known regarding the gene targets of functional AR in prostate stromal cells. Here, we describe a novel human prostate stromal cell model that enabled us to study the effects of AR on gene expression in these cells. The model involves a genetically manipulated variant of immortalized human WPMY-1 prostate stromal cells that overexpresses wildtype AR (WPMY-AR) at a level comparable to LNCaP cells and is responsive to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) stimulation. Use of WPMY-AR cells for gene expression profiling showed that the presence of AR, even in the absence of DHT, significantly altered the gene expression pattern of the cells compared to control (WPMY-Vec) cells. Treatment of WPMY-AR cells, but not WPMY-Vec control cells, with DHT resulted in further changes that affected the expression of 141 genes by 2-fold or greater compared to vehicle treated WPMY-AR cells. Remarkably, DHT significantly downregulated more genes than were upregulated but many of these changes reversed the initial effects of AR overexpression alone on individual genes. The genes most highly effected by DHT treatment were categorized based upon their role in cancer pathways or in cell signaling pathways (transforming growth factor-β, Wnt, Hedgehog and MAP Kinase) thought to be involved in stromal-epithelial crosstalk during prostate or prostate cancer development. DHT treatment of WPMY-AR cells was also sufficient to alter their paracrine potential for prostate cancer cells as conditioned medium from DHT-treated WPMY-AR significantly increased growth of LNCaP cells compared to DHT-treated WPMY-Vec cell conditioned medium.     

Characterisation of gene expression patterns in 22RV1 cells for determination of environmental androgenic/antiandrogenic compounds

Alteration of androgen receptor function due to hormonally active compounds in the environment, may be responsible for impaired reproductive function in aquatic wildlife. Based on human prostate carcinoma 22RV1 cells, a cell culture expression system was established to test effects of putative androgenic/antiandrogenic compounds on endogenous gene expression. 22RV1 cells were shown to express human androgen receptor, but not human progestin (hPR) or human oestrogen receptor (hER) alpha and beta. Six androgen-regulated genes (ARGs) were chosen to determine androgenic/antiandrogenic action using highly sensitive real-time RT-PCR. Results showed that gene expression is altered in a time-dependent manner. After stimulation of cells by DHT (10nM), synthetic androgen R1881 (1 nM), or organic pesticides (difenoconazole, fentinacetate, tetramethrin) TMPRSS2 mRNA expression was down-regulated by the factor 0.6 after 24h of DHT treatment. Similar results were obtained when cells were assayed for mRNA expression of PSA after fentinacetate and R1881 stimulation. In contrast, TMPRSS2 expression was up-regulated by the factor 0.9 when cells were stimulated by tetramethrin. Final goal of the work is a sensitive determination of differential gene expression by different compounds under study, achievement of substance-specific expression patterns and function related analysis of potential androgens/antiandrogens.     

Androgen receptor: a key molecule in the progression of prostate cancer to hormone independence

Despite earlier detection and recent advances in surgery and radiation, prostate cancer is second only to lung cancer in male cancer deaths in the United States. Hormone therapy in the form of medical or surgical castration remains the mainstay of systemic treatment in prostate cancer. Over the last 15 years with the clinical use of prostate specific antigen (PSA), there has been a shift to using hormone therapy earlier in the disease course and for longer duration. Despite initial favorable response to hormone therapy, over a period of time these tumors will develop androgen‐independence that results in death. The androgen receptor (AR) is central to the initiation and growth of prostate cancer and to its response to hormone therapy. Analyses have shown that AR continues to be expressed in androgen‐independent tumors and AR signaling remains intact as demonstrated by the expression of the AR regulated gene, PSA. Androgen‐independent prostate cancers have demonstrated a variety of AR alterations that are either not found in hormone naïve tumors or found at lower frequency. These changes include AR amplification, AR point mutation, and changes in expression of AR co‐regulatory proteins. These AR changes result in a “super AR” that can respond to lower concentrations of androgens or to a wider variety of agonistic ligands. There is also mounting evidence that AR can be activated in a ligand independent fashion by compounds such as growth factors or cytokines working independently or in combination. These growth factors working through receptor tyrosine kinase pathways may promote AR activation and growth in low androgen environments. The clinical significance of these AR alterations in the development and progression of androgen‐independent prostate cancer remains to be determined. Understanding the changes in AR signaling in the evolution of androgen‐independent prostate cancer will be key to the development of more effective hormone therapy. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Steroids inversely affect the biosynthesis and secretion of human prostatic acid phosphatase and prostate-specific antigen in the LNCaP cell line

In order to elucidate the mechanism of androgen-regulation of genes expressed only in the prostate gland, the effects of steroid hormones on the biosynthesis and secretion of human prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were studied in the human prostatic carcinoma cell line, LNCaP. This cell line produces PAP and PSA, both of which were found to be similar to the proteins purified from and located in human prostatic tissue, as shown by Western blot analysis. The synthetic androgen, R1881, regulated the biosynthesis of these two important tumour marker proteins inversely: the amount of PSA released into the medium was increased to 506%±100 of the control levels, while that of PAP was decreased to 26%±3, in 7 days. These effects were dependent on the concentration of the steroid in the growth medium. The androgen-dependent changes observed in the amounts of the secreted proteins were correlated with alterations in their intra-cellular levels. LNCaP cells were found to have very different capacities for secreting PAP and PSA. Whereas the measurable, cellular amounts of PSA and PAP were of similar magnitudes, much larger amounts of PSA than PAP were secreted into the medium. PSA was also found to be more stable than PAP in the culture medium of the LNCaP cells. Other steroids could elicit effects on PAP and PSA biosynthesis similar to those induced by R1881, and the combined effects of effective concentrations of these steroids were undistinguishable from those caused by each one of them separately, suggesting that all these compounds compete for binding to the same modified androgen receptors of the LNCaP cells. Thus, our results confirm the observations of the altered nature of the LNCaP androgen receptors, and demonstrate the ability of these ligands to produce changes in the expression of androgen-dependent prostatic genes. The fact that the changes observed at the protein level were accompanied by increased levels of PSA mRNAs and by decreased levels of PAP mRNA in steroid-treated cells, suggests that one of the targets of androgen and steroid action in the regulation of these genes is at the mRNA level.