Perspectives in the biological function, the technical and therapeutic application of bone morphogenetic proteins

The bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) belong to the transforming growth factor beta superfamily of growth and differentiation factors and have been characterized by their ability to induce new bone formation in ectopic (non-skeletal) sites. BMPs are secreted molecules and are key regulators in early embryogenesis and organogenesis. One of the many functions of BMPs is to induce cartilage, bone, and connective tissue formation in vertebrates. This osteo-inductive capacity of BMPs has long been considered very promising for applications in bone repair, in the treatment of skeletal diseases, and in oral applications such as dentiogenesis and cementogenesis during regeneration of periodontal wounds. We discuss here biological roles of the BMPs in the organism and their signaling cascades leading to bone and cartilage formation in particular. It is also the aim of this review to evaluate the potential and the problems of BMPs in skeletal tissue engineering for the regeneration of bone damaged by disease or trauma and to serve as therapeutic agents for periodontal defects.     

Cell responses to bone morphogenetic proteins and peptides derived from them: Biomedical applications and limitations

The bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are cytokines of the transforming growth factor beta family. Some BMPs such as BMP-2 and BMP-7 play a major role in the development of the skeleton and the maintenance of homeostasis during bone remodelling. To date, only BMP-2 and BMP-7 have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for specific orthopaedic applications. However, due to BMP cost, peptides derived from their knuckle epitope with osteogenic properties have been developed. BMPs are involved in many other biological events, including embryogenesis, angiogenesis and cancer. BMPs therefore have great biomedical potential as osteogenic factors and as anti-cancer agents. This review focuses on the use of BMPs and their derived peptides in biomedical delivery systems and gene therapy.     

Use of bone morphogenetic proteins in mesenchymal stem cell stimulation of cartilage and bone repair

The extracellular matrix-associated bone morphogenetic proteins(BMPs) govern a plethora of biological processes. The BMPs are members of the transforming growth factor-β protein superfamily, and they actively participate to kidney development, digit and limb formation, angiogenesis, tissue fibrosis and tumor development. Since their discovery, they have attracted attention for their fascinating perspectives in the regenerative medicine and tissue engineering fields. BMPs have been employed in many preclinical and clinical studies exploring their chondrogenic or osteoinductive potential in several animal model defects and in human diseases. During years of research in particular two BMPs, BMP2 and BMP7 have gained the podium for their use in the treatment of various cartilage and bone defects. In particular they have been recently approved for employment in non-union fractures as adjunct therapies. On the other hand, thanks to their potentialities in biomedical applications, there is a growing interest in studying the biology of mesenchymal stem cell(MSC), the rules underneath their differentiation abilities, and to test their true abilities in tissue engineering. In fact, the specific differentiation of MSCs into targeted celltype lineages for transplantation is a primary goal of the regenerative medicine. This review provides an overview on the current knowledge of BMP roles and signaling in MSC biology and differentiation capacities. In particular the article focuses on the potential clinical use of BMPs and MSCs concomitantly, in cartilage and bone tissue repair.     

Delivery of bone morphogenetic proteins for orthopedic tissue regeneration

Carriers for bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are used to increase retention of these factors at orthopedic treatment sites for a sufficient period of time to allow regenerative tissue forming cells to migrate to the area of injury and to proliferate and differentiate. Carriers can also serve as a matrix for cell infiltration while maintaining the volume in which repair tissue can form. Carriers have to be biocompatible and are often required to be bioresorbable. Carriers also have to be easily, and cost-effectively, manufactured for large-scale production, conveniently sterilized and have appropriate storage requirements and stability. All of these processes have to be approvable by regulatory agencies. The four major categories of BMP carrier materials include natural polymers, inorganic materials, synthetic polymers, composites of these materials. Autograft or allograft carriers have also used. Carrier configurations range from simple depot delivery systems to more complex systems mimicking the extracellular matrix structure and function. Bone regenerative carriers include depot delivery systems for fracture repair, three-dimensional polymer or ceramic composites for segmental repairs and spine fusion and metal or metal/ceramic composites for augmenting implant integration. Tendon/ligament regenerative carriers range from depot delivery systems to three-dimensional carriers that are either randomly oriented or linearly oriented to improve regenerative tissue alignment. Cartilage regenerative systems generally require three-dimensional matrices and often incorporate cells in addition to factors to augment the repair. Alternative BMP delivery systems include viral vectors, genetically altered cells, conjugated factors and small molecules.     

Delivering on the promise of bone morphogenetic proteins.

The advent of bone growth factors has been widely anticipated since their successful production using recombinant DNA technology. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are an important class of bone growth factors and will be the focus of this article. In the near future these therapeutics might revolutionize how clinicians treat such diverse orthopedic applications as the healing of broken bones, increasing bone density lost through aging, and strengthening the spine. These potent proteins require application directly at the site of repair via a delivery system. The choice of delivery system has a profound effect on the clinical outcome. In the past decade, researchers have focused on developing efficient delivery systems and advancing these factors from the bench to the clinic.     

Comparison of bone morphogenetic protein-2 and osteoactivin for mesenchymal cell differentiation: effects of bolus and continuous administration

Current osteoinductive protein therapy utilizes bolus administration of large doses of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), which is costly, and may not replicate normal bone healing. The limited in vivo biologic activity of BMPs requires the investigation of growth factors that may enhance this activity. In this study, we utilized the C3H10T1/2 murine mesenchymal stem cell line to test the hypotheses that osteoactivin (OA) has comparable osteoinductive effects to bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), and that sustained administration of either growth factor would result in increased osteoblastic differentiation as compared to bolus administration. Sustained release biodegradable hydrogels were designed, and C3H10T1/2 cells were grown on hydrogels loaded with BMP-2 or OA. Controls were grown on unloaded hydrogels, and positive controls were exposed to bolus growth factor administration. Cells were harvested at several time points to assess osteoblastic differentiation. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining and activity, and gene expression of ALP and osteocalcin were assessed. Treatment with OA or BMP-2 resulted in comparable effects on osteoblastic marker expression. However, cells grown on hydrogels demonstrated osteoblastic differentiation that was not as robust as cells treated with bolus administration. This study shows that OA has comparable effects to BMP-2 on osteoblastic differentiation using both bolus administration and continuous release, and that bolus administration of OA has a more profound effect than administration using hydrogels for sustained release. This study will lead to a better understanding of appropriate delivery methods of osteogenic growth factors like OA for repair of fractures and segmental bone defects.     

BMP-Non-Responsive Sca1+CD73+CD44+ Mouse Bone Marrow Derived Osteoprogenitor Cells Respond to Combination of VEGF and BMP-6 to Display Enhanced Osteoblastic Differentiation and Ectopic Bone Formation

Clinical trials on fracture repair have challenged the effectiveness of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) but suggest that delivery of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) might be beneficial. It has also been reported that BMPs could not increase mineralization in several MSCs populations, which adds ambiguity to the use of BMPs. However, an exogenous supply of MSCs combined with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and BMPs is reported to synergistically enhance fracture repair in animal models. To elucidate the mechanism of this synergy, we investigated the osteoblastic differentiation of cloned mouse bone marrow derived MSCs (D1 cells) in vitro in response to human recombinant proteins of VEGF, BMPs (-2, -4, -6, -9) and the combination of VEGF with BMP-6 (most potent BMP). We further investigated ectopic bone formation induced by MSCs pre-conditioned with VEGF, BMP-6 or both. No significant increase in mineralization, phosphorylation of Smads 1/5/8 and expression of the ALP, COL1A1 and osterix genes was observed upon addition of VEGF or BMPs alone to the cells in culture. The lack of CD105, Alk1 and Alk6 expression in D1 cells correlated with poor response to BMPs indicating that a greater care in the selection of MSCs is necessary. Interestingly, the combination of VEGF and BMP-6 significantly increased the expression of ALP, COL1A1 and osterix genes and D1 cells pre-conditioned with VEGF and BMP-6 induced greater bone formation in vivo than the non-conditioned control cells or the cells pre-conditioned with either VEGF or BMP-6 alone. This enhanced bone formation by MSCs correlated with higher CADM1 expression and OPG/RANKL ratio in the implants. Thus, combined action of VEGF and BMP on MSCs enhances osteoblastic differentiation of MSCs and increases their bone forming ability, which cannot be achieved through use of BMPs alone. This strategy can be effectively used for bone repair.     

The mouse short ear skeletal morphogenesis locus is associated with defects in a bone morphogenetic member of the TGF beta superfamily.

The mouse short ear gene is required for normal growth and patterning of skeletal structures, and for repair of bone fractures in adults. We have carried out an extensive chromosome walk in the chromosome region that surrounds this locus. Here we show that the short ear region contains the gene for a TGF beta-related protein called bone morphogenetic protein 5 (Bmp-5). This gene is deleted or rearranged in several independent mutations at the short ear locus. Mice homozygous for large deletions of the Bmp-5 coding region are viable and fertile. Mutations at the short ear locus provide an important new tool for defining the normal functions of BMPs in mammals. The specific skeletal defects seen in short-eared animals, which occur against a background of otherwise normal skeletal structures, suggest that particular aspects of skeletal morphology may be determined by individual members of a family of signaling factors that can induce the formation of cartilage and bone in vivo.     

BMPs are mediators in tissue crosstalk of the regenerating musculoskeletal system

The musculoskeletal system is a tight network of many tissues. Coordinated interplay at a biochemical level between tissues is essential for development and repair. Traumatic injury usually affects several tissues and represents a large challenge in clinical settings. The current demand for potent growth factors in such applications thus accompanies the keen interest in molecular mechanisms and orchestration of tissue formation. Of special interest are multitasking growth factors that act as signals in a variety of cell types, both in a paracrine and in an autocrine manner, thereby inducing cell differentiation and coordinating not only tissue assembly at specific sites but also maturation and homeostasis. We concentrate here on bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), which are important crosstalk mediators known for their irreplaceable roles in vertebrate development. The molecular crosstalk during embryonic musculoskeletal tissue formation is recapitulated in adult repair. BMPs act at different levels from the initiation to maturation of newly formed tissue. Interestingly, this is influenced by the spatiotemporal expression of different BMPs, their receptors and co-factors at the site of repair. Thus, the regenerative potential of BMPs needs to be evaluated in the context of highly connected tissues such as muscle and bone and might indeed be different in more poorly connected tissues such as cartilage. This highlights the need for an understanding of BMP signaling across tissues in order to eventually improve BMP regenerative potential in clinical applications. In this review, the distinct members of the BMP family and their individual contribution to musculoskeletal tissue repair are summarized by focusing on their paracrine and autocrine functions.     

Combination of adeno-associated virus and adenovirus vectors expressing bone morphogenetic protein-2 produces enhanced osteogenic activity in immunocompetent rats

We have previously shown that gene therapy using adeno-associated virus (AAV) carrying bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) is a promising strategy for new bone formation in vivo in SD rats. However, it had a relatively low transduction efficiency. We investigate here whether enhanced osteogenic activity can be achieved without eliciting a severe immune response, using a cocktail of AAV-BMP2 and adenovirus (Ad)-BMP2 as a vector system. The muscles of SD rats were injected with either AAV-BMP2, Ad-BMP2, or an AAV-BMP2/Ad-BMP2 cocktail, and the in vivo bone formation was determined at eight weeks post-injection. Radiographic examination demonstrated that the addition of a low level of Ad-BMP2 to AAV-BMP2 produced significantly higher new bone formation than the use of AAV-BMP2 alone. Histological and immunohistological analysis revealed an enlarged bone-forming area and a long-term BMP2 expression, without pronounced infiltration of lymphocytes. Our results provide the first evidence that the introduction of a low level of adenovirus in vivo in immunocompetent subjects can greatly enhance AAV-mediated gene transfer, without inducing severe immune responses. This cocktail vector system may offer an attractive way of improving the efficiency of AAV-based gene delivery.     

Delivery of recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins for bone regeneration and repair. Part A: Current challenges in BMP delivery

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins (rhBMPs) have been extensively investigated for developing therapeutic strategies aimed at the restoration and treatment of orthopaedic as well as craniofacial conditions. In this first part of the review, we discuss the rationale for the necessary use of carrier systems to deliver rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7 to sites of bone tissue regeneration and repair. General requirements for growth factor delivery systems emphasizing the distinction between localized and release-controlled delivery strategies are presented highlighting the current limitations in the development of an effective rhBMP delivery system applicable in clinical bone tissue engineering.     

Combinatorial gene therapy for bone regeneration: cooperative interactions between adenovirus vectors expressing bone morphogenetic proteins 2, 4, and 7

Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have demonstrated effectiveness as bone regeneration agents whether delivered as recombinant proteins or via gene therapy. Current gene therapy approaches use vectors expressing single BMPs. In contrast, multiple BMPs are coordinately expressed during bone development and fracture healing. Furthermore, BMPs likely exist in vivo as heterodimeric molecules having enhanced biological activity. In the present study, we test the hypothesis that gene therapy-based bone regeneration can be enhanced by expressing combinations of BMPs. For in vitro studies, mesenchymal cell lines were transduced with individual adenoviruses containing BMP2, 4, or 7 cDNA under control of a CMV promoter (AdBMP2, 4, 7) or virus combinations. Significantly, combined transduction with AdBMP2 plus AdBMP7 or AdBMP4 plus AdBMP7 resulted in a synergistic stimulation of osteoblast differentiation. This synergy is best explained by formation of BMP2/7 and 4/7 heterodimers. To test in vivo biological activity, fibroblasts were transduced with specific virus combinations and implanted into C57BL6 mice. Consistent with in vitro results, strong synergy was observed using combined AdBMP2/BMP7 treatment, which induced twofold to threefold more bone than would be predicted based on the activity of individual AdBMPs. These studies show that dramatic enhancement of osteogenesis can be achieved using gene therapy to express specific combinations of interacting regenerative molecules.     

The “bone morphogenic proteins” pathways in bone and joint diseases: Translational perspectives from physiopathology to therapeutic targets

A large body of evidence supports an important role of bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) pathways in skeletal development in the embryo. BMPs are also involved in skeletal homeostasis and diseases in the adult. They were first identified as major bone anabolic agents and recent advances indicate that they also regulate osteoclastogenesis and joint components via multiple cross-talks with other signaling pathways. This review attempts to integrate these data in the pathogenesis of bone and joints diseases, such as osteoporosis, fracture healing, osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, or bone metastasis. The use of recombinant BMPs in bone tissue engineering and in the treatment of skeletal diseases, or future therapeutic strategies targeting BMPs signal and its regulators, will be discussed based on these considerations.     

Bone Regeneration in Rat Cranium Critical-Size Defects Induced by Cementum Protein 1 (CEMP1)

Gene therapy approaches to bone and periodontal tissue engineering are being widely explored. While localized delivery of osteogenic factors like BMPs is attractive for promotion of bone regeneration; method of delivery, dosage and side effects could limit this approach. A novel protein, Cementum Protein 1 (CEMP1), has recently been shown to promote regeneration of periodontal tissues. In order to address the possibility that CEMP1 can be used to regenerate other types of bone, experiments were designed to test the effect of hrCEMP1 in the repair/regeneration of a rat calvaria critical-size defect. Histological and microcomputed tomography (µCT) analyses of the calvaria defect sites treated with CEMP1 showed that after 16 weeks, hrCEMP1 is able to induce 97% regeneration of the defect. Furthermore, the density and characteristics of the new mineralized tissues were normal for bone. This study demonstrates that hrCEMP1 stimulates bone formation and regeneration and has therapeutic potential for the treatment of bone defects and regeneration of mineralized tissues.     

Heparin potentiates the in vivo ectopic bone formation induced by bone morphogenetic protein-2

Although bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are clinically useful for bone regeneration, large amounts are required to induce new bone formation in monkeys and humans. We found recently that heparin stimulates BMP activity in vitro (Takada, T., Katagiri, T., Ifuku, M., Morimura, N., Kobayashi, M., Hasegawa, K., Ogamo, A., and Kamijo, R. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 43229-43235). In the present study, we examined whether heparin enhances bone formation induced by BMPs in vivo and attempted to determine the molecular mechanism by which heparin stimulates BMP activity using C2C12 myoblasts. Heparin enhanced BMP-2-induced gene expression and Smad1/5/8 phosphorylation at 24 h and thereafter, although not within 12 h. Heparitinase treatment did not affect the response of cells to BMP-2. In the presence of heparin, degradation of BMP-2 was blocked, and the half-life of BMP-2 in the culture medium was prolonged by nearly 20-fold. Although noggin mRNA was induced by BMP-2 within 1 h regardless of the presence of heparin, noggin failed to inhibit BMP-2 activity in the presence of heparin. Furthermore, simultaneous administration of BMP-2 and heparin in vivo dose-dependently induced larger amounts of mineralized bone tissue compared with BMP-2 alone. These findings clearly indicate that heparin enhances BMP-induced osteoblast differentiation not only in vitro but also in vivo. This study indicates that heparin enhances BMP-induced osteoblast differentiation in vitro and in vivo by protecting BMPs from degradation and inhibition by BMP antagonists.     

LIM mineralization protein-1 potentiates bone morphogenetic protein responsiveness via a novel interaction with Smurf1 resulting in decreased ubiquitination of Smads

Development and repair of the skeletal system and other organs is highly dependent on precise regulation of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), their receptors, and their intracellular signaling proteins known as Smads. The use of BMPs clinically to induce bone formation has been limited in part by the requirement of much higher doses of recombinant proteins in primates than were needed in cell culture or rodents. Therefore, control of cellular responsiveness to BMPs is now a critical area that is poorly understood. We determined that LMP-1, a LIM domain protein capable of inducing de novo bone formation, interacts with Smurf1 (Smad ubiquitin regulatory factor 1) and prevents ubiquitination of Smads. In the region of LMP responsible for bone formation, there is a motif that directly interacts with the Smurf1 WW2 domain and can effectively compete with Smad1 and Smad5 for binding. We have shown that small peptides containing this motif can mimic the ability to block Smurf1 from binding Smads. This novel interaction of LMP-1 with the WW2 domain of Smurf1 to block Smad binding results in increased cellular responsiveness to exogenous BMP and demonstrates a novel regulatory mechanism for the BMP signaling pathway.     

Ex vivo gene therapy in autologous critical-size craniofacial bone regeneration

In therapeutic bone repairs, autologous bone grafts, conventional or vascularized allografts, and biocompatible artificial bone substitutes all have their shortcomings. The bone formed from peptides [recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs)], demineralized bone powder, or a combination of both is small in size. Tissue engineering may be an alternative for cranial bone repair. In this study, the authors developed an animal model to test the hypothesis that replication-defective, adenovirus-mediated human BMP-2 gene transfer to bone marrow stromal cells enhances the autologous bone formation for repairing a critical-size craniofacial defect. The mesenchymal stromal cells of miniature swine were separated from the iliac crest aspirate and expanded in monolayer culture 1 month before implantation. The cultured mesenchymal stromal cells were infected with recombinant, replication-defective human adenovirus BMP-2, 7 days before implantation. Bilateral 2 x 5-cm2 cranial defects were created, leaving no osteogenic periosteum and dura behind. Mesenchymal stromal cells at 5 x 10(7)/ml were mixed with collagen type I to form mesenchymal stromal cell/polymer constructs. Mesenchymal stromal cells used for the control site were infected with adenovirus beta-Gal under the same conditions. After 6 weeks and 3 months, 10 miniature swine were euthanized and the cranium repair was examined. Near-complete repair of the critical-size cranial defect by tissue-engineered mesenchymal stromal cell/collagen type I construct was observed. The new bone formation area (in square centimeters) measured by three-dimensional computed tomography demonstrated that the improvement from 6 weeks to 3 months was significantly greater on the experimental side than on the control side (2.15 cm2 versus 0.54 cm2, p < 0.001) and significantly greater at 3 months than at 6 weeks (2.13 cm2 versus 0.52 cm2, p < 0.001). The difference between the experimental and control groups was significant at 3 months (mean difference, 2.13 cm2; p < 0.001). The maximal compressive strength of the new bone was similar to that of the normal cranial bone when evaluated by biomechanical testing (cranium bone versus tissue-engineered bone, 88.646 +/- 5.121 MPa versus 80.536 +/- 19.302 MPa; p = 0.227). Adenovirus was absent from all constructs by immunochemical staining at 6 weeks and 3 months after implantation. The successful repair of cranial defects in this experiment demonstrates the efficacy of the integration of the autologous stem cell concept, gene medicine, and polymers in producing tissue-engineered bone.     

Evaluation of the Effect of a Gamma Irradiated DBM-Pluronic F127 Composite on Bone Regeneration in Wistar Rat

Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is widely used for bone regeneration. Since DBM is prepared in powder form its handling properties are not optimal and limit the clinical use of this material. Various synthetic and biological carriers have been used to enhance the DBM handling. In this study we evaluated the effect of gamma irradiation on the physical-chemical properties of Pluronic and on bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) amount in DBM samples. In vivo studies were carried out to investigate the effect on bone regeneration of a gamma irradiated DBM-Pluronic F127 (DBM-PF127) composite implanted in the femur of rats. Gamma irradiation effects (25 kGy) on physical-chemical properties of Pluronic F127 were investigated by rheological and infrared analysis. The BMP-2/BMP-7 amount after DBM irradiation was evaluated by ELISA. Bone regeneration capacity of DBM-PF127 containing 40% (w/w) of DBM was investigated in transcortical holes created in the femoral diaphysis of Wistar rat. Bone porosity, repaired bone volume and tissue organization were evaluated at 15, 30 and 90 days by Micro-CT and histological analysis. The results showed that gamma irradiation did not induce significant modification on physical-chemical properties of Pluronic, while a decrease in BMP-2/BMP-7 amount was evidenced in sterilized DBM. Micro-CT and histological evaluation at day 15 post-implantation revealed an interconnected trabeculae network in medullar cavity and cellular infiltration and vascularization of DBM-PF127 residue. In contrast a large rate of not connected trabeculae was observed in Pluronic filled and unfilled defects. At 30 and 90 days the DBM-PF127 samples shown comparable results in term of density and thickness of the new formed tissue respect to unfilled defect. In conclusion a gamma irradiated DBM-PF127 composite, although it may have undergone a significant decrease in the concentration of BMPs, was able to maintains bone regeneration capability.