培美曲塞联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效观察

目的:探讨培美曲塞联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床疗效。方法:随机选取我院肿瘤科晚期NSCLC患者177例,随机将其分为3组,培美曲塞联合顺铂治疗(PP组)72例,多西他赛联合顺铂治疗(DP组)53例,吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗(GP组)52例,比较三组治疗方法的临床疗效与不良反应之间的差异,根据临床疗效将PP组分为有效组与无效组,分析培美曲塞联合顺铂治疗晚期NSCLC的影响因素。结果:PP组疾病控制率(DCR)与客观有效率(ORR)均显著高于GP组(均P0.05);PP组与DP组近期疗效之间的比较无显著差异(均P0.05)。PP组的药物毒副作用均显著优于DP组与GP组(均P0.05)。PP组的中位生存期显著高于DP组与GP组(均P0.05),在无吸烟、腺癌与IV期晚期NSCLC患者中,培美曲塞联合顺铂治疗有效率更高。结论:培美曲塞治疗晚期NSCLC的疗效佳,与多西他赛相当并显著优于吉西他滨治疗,药物毒副作用小,且受吸烟状况、病理类型与临床分期影响。     

培美曲塞联合顺铂化疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者疗效及血清肿瘤标志物的影响

目的:探究培美曲塞联合顺铂化疗对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者疗效及血清肿瘤标志物的影响。方法:选取于2012年7月~2016年2月期间我院收治的89例非小细胞肺癌患者为研究对象,采用随机数字法将研究对象分为观察组(45例)和对照组(44例);观察组采用培美曲塞联合顺铂化疗,对照组采用多西他赛联合顺铂化疗,观察并比较两组患者治疗前后细胞角质素片段抗原(CYRAF211)、血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)表达水平。结果:观察组疗效优于对照组,比较有统计学差异(Z=1.940,P=0.026),观察组治疗的总有效率(55.66%)显著高于对照组(36.37%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.432,P=0.034);化疗后,两组CEA、CYFRA21-1、CA125及NSE水平均较化疗前较有显著下降,同时观察组各指标水平均显著低于对照组(P0.05);化疗前,Ⅲ期患者肿瘤标志物CEA、CYFRA21-1、CA125及NSE水平均显著低于Ⅳ期患者(P0.05);化疗后,Ⅲ期和Ⅳ期患者肿瘤标志物CEA、CYFRA21-1、CA125及NSE水平较治疗前均有显著降低(P0.05),且Ⅲ期水平显著低于Ⅳ期(P0.05)。结论:培美曲塞联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌具有显著疗效,血清CEA、CYFRA21-1、CA125及NSE水平经化疗后显著降低,可作为分期和评价化疗疗效的可靠指标。     

培美曲塞+顺铂方案诱导化疗联合同期放化疗对局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效及安全性观察

目的:探究培美曲塞+顺铂方案诱导化疗联合同期放化疗对局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效及安全性。方法:收集我院肿瘤科2009年7月到2011年7月住院治疗的局部晚期非鳞癌非小细胞癌患者54例,按照随机数字表法分为研究组和对照组,每组27例,研究组给予培美曲塞+顺铂方案诱导化疗联合同期放化疗,对照组仅给予培美曲塞+顺铂方案化疗联合同期放疗,治疗2个周期,随访2年,对比两组患者的近期疗效及安全性。结果:研究组的近期有效率和控制率分别为55.56%、77.78%,高于对照组的50.33%和59.26%,有效率和控制率差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。随访2年,研究组的中位生存期为12.77个月,1年生存率为48.15%,高于对照组中位生存期11.28个月,1年生存率40.74%,但差异无统计学意义(P0.05),研究组2年生存率为43.46%,高于对照组的25.38%,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);研究组白细胞减少以及脱发发生率分别为37.0%、25.9%,低于对照组的81.5%和55.5%,差异具有统计学意义(均P0.05);研究组中血小板减少、血红蛋白减少、呕吐、肝功能损害、肾功能损耗、皮疹等发生率分别为40.7%、22.2%、59.2%、11.1%、7.4%、14.8%,高于对照组中各不良反应发生率分别为33.3%、18.5%、55.5%、14.8%、11.1%、7.4%,但两组间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:培美曲塞+顺铂方案诱导化疗联合同期放化疗对局部晚期非小细胞肺癌治疗效果明显,且不良反应少,可作为临床上晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗一线药物。     

培美曲塞化疗对非小细胞肺癌患者T淋巴细胞亚群的影响

目的:探究培美曲塞化疗对非小细胞肺癌患者T淋巴细胞亚群的影响,评价其临床应用价值。方法:选取2016年3月到2017年3月我院肿瘤内科收治的100例非小细胞肺癌患者进行研究,其中,50例非小细胞肺癌患者采用培美曲塞化疗、50例采用多西他赛进行化疗。比较患者治疗前后T淋巴细胞亚群变化情况。结果:与化疗前比较,非小细胞肺癌患者化疗后CD_3~+、CD_4~+、CD_4~+/CD_8~+比值以及NK细胞显著上升,而CD_8~+显著下降(P0.05)。为了验证培美曲塞对非小细胞肺癌患者的安全性,本研究将部分患者采用多西他赛化疗,非小细胞肺癌患者培美曲塞和多西他赛化疗后CD_3~+、CD_4~+、CD_4~+/CD_8~+比值以及NK细胞相比差异不大(P0.05)。此外,两组不良反应如恶心、呕吐,细胞减少,血小板减少,肾功能障碍差异不大(P0.05)。结论:培美曲塞化疗可以显著改变非小细胞患者的T淋巴细胞亚群构成,提高患者免疫功能和治疗效果。     

培美曲塞联合罗格列酮抑制肺癌A549 细胞增殖研究

目的:研究培美曲塞联合过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(Peroxisome proliferators-activated receptorγ,PPARγ)激动剂罗格列酮(Rosiglitazone,RSG)对人肺癌A549细胞株增殖能力的影响。方法:蛋白质印迹法检测肺癌细胞系中PPARγ的表达水平,筛选高表达PPARγ的肺癌细胞株利用该细胞株并分别给予培美曲塞、培美曲塞联合罗格列酮、培美曲塞联合罗格列酮及PPARγ拮抗剂GW9662处理,之后检测细胞增殖能力及PPARγ、PTEN、pAKT表达水平的变化。结果:PPARγ在A549细胞系中显著高表达;培美曲塞组、培美曲塞联合罗格列酮组、培美曲塞联合罗格列酮及GW9662组,肺癌细胞增殖均受到抑制,吾美曲塞和罗格列酮联合应用对肺癌细胞的增殖抑制具有协同效应,与单用培美曲塞组相比有统计学差异,且该效应可被GW9662有效阻断;给予培美曲塞和罗格列酮联合应用,可明显上调PPARγ、PTEN表达,下调pAKT表达;给予PPARγ拮抗剂GW9662后,PPARγ、PTEN的表达显著下调,pAKT表达上调。结论:PPARγ激动剂RSG对培美曲塞抑制肺癌细胞的增殖具有协同效应且其分子机制可能是通过激活PPARγ/PTEN/pAKT信号通路从而抑制肺癌A549细胞增殖。     

化疗联合放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌疗效观察

目的:研究化疗联合放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效及毒副作用.方法:58例非小细胞肺癌患者随机分为观察组与对照组两组各29例,观察组患者采用化疗联合放疗治疗,对照组患者只采用化疗治疗.观察比较两组患者的临床疗效、1,2,3年生存率及毒副作用.结果:观察组患者的有效率(79.3％)明显高于对照组(41.4％),两组相比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).观察组患者1,2,3年生存率均高于对照组,两组相比差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05,P＜0.01).两组患者的Ⅱ-Ⅳ级白细胞减少率,Ⅲ-Ⅳ级血红蛋白减少率,Ⅲ-Ⅳ级消化系统反应无显著差别,两组相比差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论:相对于单纯化疗,化疗联合放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌临床效果更好,毒副作用并未加重,可以显著提高患者生存率,值得临床推广应用.     

帕博利珠单抗联合培美曲塞和卡铂治疗晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的疗效及对肿瘤标志物和细胞免疫功能的影响

摘要 目的：探讨卡铂和培美曲塞联合帕博利珠单抗治疗对晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）细胞免疫功能和肿瘤标志物的影响。方法：选取2018年10月~2021年2月期间徐州医科大学附属医院收治的78例晚期非鳞状NSCLC患者,按照随机数字表法分为对照组（n=39,接受培美曲塞联合卡铂治疗）和联合组（n=39,在对照组的基础上接受帕博利珠单抗治疗）。对比两组疗效、肿瘤标志物水平、细胞免疫功能指标、不良反应发生情况。结果：联合组的客观缓解率、疾病控制率均高于对照组（P<0.05）。两组不良反应发生率对比无差异（P>0.05）。治疗后,两组癌胚抗原（CEA）、细胞角蛋白19片段（CYFRA21-1）、糖类抗原125（CA125）水平下降,且联合组低于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗后,两组CD3⁺、CD4⁺、CD4⁺/CD8⁺下降,但联合组高于对照组（P<0.05）;治疗后,两组CD8⁺升高,但联合组低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论：帕博利珠单抗联合培美曲塞和卡铂治疗晚期非鳞状NSCLC,可有效控制疾病进展,改善患者免疫功能,降低CEA、CYFRA21-1、CA125水平。     

培美曲塞联合顺铂对老年Ⅲ~Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者血清CEA，CYFRA21-1，p-ERK，VEGF 及AnnexinⅡ水平的影响

目的:探讨培美曲塞联合顺铂对老年Ⅲ~Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者血清癌胚抗原(CEA),细胞角质素片段抗原21-1(CYFRA21-1),磷酸化细胞外信号调节激酶(p-ERK),血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)及膜联蛋白Ⅱ(AnnexinⅡ)水平的影响。方法:120例老年Ⅲ~Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者按抽签法分为对照组(n=60)与观察组(n=60),对照组予以多西紫衫醇联合顺铂治疗,观察组予以培美曲塞联合顺铂治疗,比较两组CEA,CYFRA21-1,p-ERK,VEGF,AnnexinⅡ,基质金属蛋白酶-2(MMP-2)及转化生长因子β1(TGF-β1),NK细胞,CD3~+,CD4~+,临床疗效和不良反应。结果:治疗后,观察组CEA,CYFRA21-1,p-ERK,VEGF,AnnexinⅡ,MMP-2及TGF-β1低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。观察组NK细胞,CD3~+及CD4~+高于对照组(P0.05)。观察组临床疗效、不良反应均优于对照组(P0.05)。结论:培美曲塞联合顺铂化疗可降低老年Ⅲ~Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者血清CEA,CYFRA21-1,p-ERK,VEGF及AnnexinⅡ水平,控制肿瘤进展,值得推广。     

康莱特注射液联合NP方案化疗治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床观察

目的:探讨康莱特注射液联合NP方案治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的近期疗效、毒副反应及生活质量.方法:将127例患者随机分为两组,治疗组64例,予NP方案:NVB25mg/m2第1、8天静点+DDP 80mg/m2分三天,第1,2,3天静点,每3周重复.同时给予康莱特液200ml qd第1-21天静点.对照组予NP方案:NVB25ml/m2第1、8天静点+DDP 80mg/m2分三天,第1,2,3天静点,每3周重复.两组患者在治疗4周期后,进行评价.结果:在近期疗效上,治疗组优于对照组.P＜0.05.在白细胞减少、贫血及呕吐的发生上,治疗组优于对照组,均P＜0.05.生活质量的提高及体重的增加方面,治疗组优于对照组,均P＜0.05.结论:康莱特注射液联合NP方案化疗治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌,能提高近期疗效,减少毒副反应,提高生活质量.     

康莱特注射液联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效

目的:探讨康莱特注射液联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床疗效。方法:选择我院60例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,按随机数字表法平均分为两组各30例,两组患者均给予NP化疗方案治疗,研究组患者在此基础上联合康莱特注射液治疗。比较两组患者近期治疗疗效、生活质量Karnofsky评分、1年生存率、中位生存时间、平均生存时间以及毒副反应发生情况。结果:研究组患者近期治疗有效率为53.3%,明显高于对照组33.3%,比较差异具有统计学意义(X2=4.12,P0.05);研究组患者治疗后生活质量Karnofsky评分好转率为66.7%,明显高于对照组36.7%,比较差异具有统计学意义(X2=5.41,P0.05);研究组患者经治疗后1年生存率、中位生存时间和平均生存时间分别为60.0%、15.0个月和(11.0±5.1)个月,均明显高于对照组30.0%、9.0个月和(5.9±4.8)个月,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(X2=5.45,t=5.24,6.12,P0.05);研究组患者治疗过程毒副反应恶心呕吐及白细胞下降发生率均明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(X2=4.27,5.08,P0.05)。结论:康莱特注射液联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床疗效显著,可明显改善患者生活质量,降低毒副反应发生率,值得临床推广应用。     

Pemetrexed plus platinum as the first-line treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

To compare the efficacy and toxicities of pemetrexed plus platinum with other platinum regimens in patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A meta-analysis was performed using trials identified through PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Two investigators independently assessed the quality of the trials and extracted data. The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and different types of toxicity. Hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using RevMan software. Results: Four trials involving 2,518 patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC met the inclusion criteria. Pemetrexed plus platinum chemotherapy (PPC) improved survival compared with other platinum-based regimens (PBR) in patients with advanced NSCLC (HR?=?0.91, 95% CI: 0.83-1.00, p?=?0.04), especially in those with non-squamous histology (HR?=?0.87, 95% CI: 0.77-0.98, p?=?0.02). No statistically significant improvement in either PFS or RR was found in PPC group as compared with PBR group (HR?=?1.03, 95% CI: 0.94-1.13, p?=?0.57; OR?=?1.15, 95% CI: 0.95-1.39, p?=?0.15, respectively). Compared with PBR, PPC led to less grade 3-4 neutropenia and leukopenia but more grade 3-4 nausea. However, hematological toxicity analysis revealed significant heterogeneities. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that PPC in the first-line setting leads to a significant survival advantage with acceptable toxicities for advanced NSCLC patients, especially those with non-squamous histology, as compared with other PRB. PPC could be considered as the first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC patients, especially those with non-squamous histology.     

Systematic review and meta-analysis of Endostar (rh-endostatin) combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Many studies have investigated the efficacy of Endostar combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (PBDC) versus PBDC alone for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study is a meta-analysis of available evidence. METHODS: Fifteen studies reporting Endostar combined with PBDC versus PBDC alone for treating advanced NSCLC were reviewed. Pooled odds ratios and hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using either the fixed effects model or random effects model. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of Endostar combined with PBDC for treating NSCLC were significantly higher than those of PBDC alone, with 14.7% and 13.5% improvement, respectively (P < 0.00001). In addition, the time to progression (TTP) and quality of life (QOL) were improved after the treatment of Endostar combined with PBDC (P < 0.00001). The main adverse effects found in this review were hematological reactions, hepatic toxicity, and nausea/vomiting. Endostar combined with PBDC had a similar incidence of adverse reactions compared with PBDC alone (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Endostar combined with PBDC was associated with higher RR, DCR, and TTP as well as superior QOL profiles compared with PBDC alone. Endostar combined with PBDC had a similar incidence of adverse reactions compared with PBDC alone.     

抗-VEGF和抗-EGFR药物在进展期非小细胞肺癌治疗中的应用

化疗对非小细胞肺癌的疗效已到达平台期,研发更为有效、易耐受的治疗策略势在必行.肿瘤生物学分子机制研究孕育了分子靶向治疗.VEGF、EGFR相关信号通路在肿瘤发生、发展中发挥重要作用,是抗肿瘤药物的重要分子靶点.贝伐单抗联合化疗和小分子酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(埃罗替尼和吉非替尼)分别成为非小细胞肺癌的一、二线治疗方案.本文将综述多种抗-VEGF和抗-EGFR新药在进展期非小细胞肺癌治疗中的临床应用.     

榄香烯治疗非小细胞肺癌的作用机制研究进展

榄香烯注射液是从天然中草药姜科植物温郁金中提取获得的萜烯类化合物,其主要生物学活性为降低肿瘤细胞有丝分裂能力,诱导肿瘤细胞凋亡,抑制肿瘤细胞的生长,从而改善NSCLC患者的临床症状,增强患者免疫力.本文主要从杀灭癌细胞、诱导癌细胞凋亡、抑制癌细胞血管形成、增强患者免疫力等几方面综述榄香烯注射液对非小细胞肺癌的作用机制.     

Controversies in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: maintenance therapy

The majority of patients with non-small cell lung (NSCLC) present with advanced, metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. The current state of the art for the management of this condition is first- and second-line chemotherapy (CT), along with appropriate supporting care measures, which are supposed to alleviate symptoms and to improve survival. During the last years, maintenance therapy (MT) was included in the therapeutic algorithm for these patients. MT could be defined as continuation of an active treatment until disease progression in patients who demonstrated a non-progressing status following induction chemotherapy. Despite the results of several randomized trials showing a significant benefit by using this approach, the strategy is far from being universally accepted. The internationally recognized guidelines provide different recommendation when it comes to this topic, while some major drawbacks in the design of the positive clinical trials may have distorted the relevance of the communicated data. This paper aimed to review the most contentious aspects which should be considered while contemplating the use of MT in the daily clinical practice.     

Genetic and epigenetic analysis of non-small cell lung cancer with NotI-microarrays

This study aimed to clarify genetic and epigenetic alterations that occur during lung carcinogenesis and to design perspective sets of newly identified biomarkers. The original method includes chromosome 3 specific NotI-microarrays containing 180 NotI clones associated with genes for hybridization with 40 paired normal/tumor DNA samples of primary lung tumors: 28 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) and 12 adenocarcinomas (ADC). The NotI-microarray data were confirmed by qPCR and bisulfite sequencing analyses. Forty-four genes showed methylation and/or deletions in more than 15% of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples. In general, SCC samples were more frequently methylated/deleted than ADC. Moreover, the SCC alterations were observed already at stage I of tumor development, whereas in ADC many genes showed tumor progression specific methylation/deletions. Among genes frequently methylated/deleted in NSCLC, only a few were already known tumor suppressor genes: RBSP3 (CTDSPL), VHL and THRB. The RPL32, LOC285205, FGD5 and other genes were previously not shown to be involved in lung carcinogenesis. Ten methylated genes, i.e., IQSEC1, RBSP3, ITGA9, FOXP1, LRRN1, GNAI2, VHL, FGD5, ALDH1L1 and BCL6 were tested for expression by qPCR and were found downregulated in the majority of cases. Three genes (RBSP3, FBLN2 and ITGA9) demonstrated strong cell growth inhibition activity. A comprehensive statistical analysis suggested the set of 19 gene markers, ANKRD28, BHLHE40, CGGBP1, RBSP3, EPHB1, FGD5, FOXP1, GORASP1/TTC21, IQSEC1, ITGA9, LOC285375, LRRC3B, LRRN1, MITF, NKIRAS1/RPL15, TRH, UBE2E2, VHL, WNT7A, to allow early detection, tumor progression, metastases and to discriminate between SCC and ADC with sensitivity and specificity of 80–100%.     

图像引导放射治疗老年非小细胞肺癌30例

目的:分析图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)对老年非小细胞肺癌患者的临床疗效.方法:30例老年非小细胞肺癌患者,全部采用医科达图像引导放射治疗系统,GTV:60Gy,参考剂量线为95%～98%,分割方式3～4Gy/次.结果:肿瘤完全缓解率为33%(10/30),部分缓解率为50%(15/30),总有效率为83%(25/30).1、2、3年生存率为85%、70%、67%.结论:图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)对老年非小细胞肺癌有较好的局部控制率,是治疗老年非小细胞肺癌患者的有效方法之一.     

Factors associated with immunotherapy respond and survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

ObjectivesThis study aimed to explore factors associated with immunotherapy respond and survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).MethodsA total of 101 patients with aNSCLC receiving ICIs were included. The association between clinical factors and multiple endpoints including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were investigated by multivariate analyses.ResultsMultivariate logistic analyses revealed that clinical stage, lactate dehydrogena (LDH), and any grade immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were independent predictors of ORR, while LDH and ICIs treatment type were independent predictors of DCR. In Multivariate Cox analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), LDH, albumin (Alb), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and any grade irAEs were independent factors for OS. Similarly, clinical stage, LDH, Alb, and any grade irAEs were independent factors for PFS. Pre-treatment prognostic score was established based on clinical stage, ECOG PS, LDH, Alb and PLR to classify patients into three groups: the good group (0–1 score), the intermediate group (2 scores) and the poor group (3-4 scores). The immunotherapy response was significantly different in various prognostic groups. Subset analyses showed pre-treatment prognostic score ≥ 3 tended to have a strong negative impact on survival among patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50%.ConclusionsPre-treatment prognostic score based on clinical stage, ECOG PS, LDH, Alb and PLR may help to identify aNSCLC patients who may benefit from ICIs.