蚱蝉(Cryptotympana atrat)自鸣声的音色与编码

本文报道同一蚱蝉自鸣声主要含三种音色,即单音色、双音色及三音色,它们均由不重迭的子频带构成。与音色相应的自鸣声模式均由脉冲列(pulse train, PT)组成,每个PT内含主脉冲的频率恰好与子频带对应。在时域和频域上,蚱蝉自鸣声具有编码特征。     

蚱蝉(Cryptotympana atrata Fabricius)自鸣声音色的变化

蚱蝉自鸣声的音色分为单音色、双音色.及三音色等.本文进一步阐明每种音色的变化及高幅值脉冲对主音色能量的影响.蚱蝉自鸣声音色的变化主要是指频谱主音色频率(MTF)的显著改变、蚱蝉单色自鸣声的MTF主要在4.1—5.8kHz的频带内变化,双音色自鸣声的主次音色频率有相互颠倒现象,MTF主要在3.6—5.4kHz之间,三音色自鸣声的MTF虽然在3.5—4.5kHz比较窄的频带内,但三个音色峰的能量十分接近显示了三种音色成分.同只蚱蝉自鸣声,在不同的鸣声段具有近似相等的最大幅值,但高幅值脉冲个数的多少不同,相应主音色能量的大小与这些脉冲个数的多少对应.     

蝉的发声膜结构和腹部运动对鸣声的影响

本文报道了蝉类鸣声的波形特征与发声膜的结构类型并不具有确定的对应关系,即鸣声的波形结构构并不完全取决于发声膜的结构作用,还与其他因素有关;蝉的膜部运动对产生由复合声组成的鸣声具有关键性作用,     

蟋蟀(Loxoblemmus doenitzi Stein)鸣声的特征和黑蝉(C.atrata Fabricius.)鸣声对其的影响

本文由1741个叫声的分析,给出了蟋蟀的鸣声特征和黑蝉叫声的影响.雄蟋招引声的每个单次叫声(SC)平均含有7.6个节拍,每个含有2个脉冲列组,每组含有4个主要的调幅脉冲列.每个SC的声长、间隔和平均重复周期(?)及节拍速(?)分别为1.285-1.325s,0.755—0.746s和2.078s及每秒7.6个节拍.鸣声谱的主峰频率(MPF)和MPF下降20db的带宽分别为5223±79Hz和(4498±82)—(5656±68)Hz.正在歌唱的蟋蟀鸣声基本上不受黑蝉自鸣声的影响,但黑蝉的前置自鸣声对蟋蟀鸣声波形有一定的影响.黑蝉的惊叫声不仅对蟋蟀鸣声波形有明显影响,而且时间特性有一定影响,即(?)约缩短一半,(?)的变差明显扩大.但对频率特性都无影响.     

蟋蟀(Loxoblemmus doenitzi Stein)鸣声的特征和黑蝉(C.atrata Fabricius.)鸣声对其的影响

本文由1741个叫声的分析,给出了蟋蟀的鸣声特征和黑蝉叫声的影响.雄蟋招引声的每个单次叫声(SC)平均含有7.6个节拍,每个含有2个脉冲列组,每组含有4个主要的调幅脉冲列.每个SC的声长、间隔和平均重复周期(?)及节拍速(?)分别为1.285-1.325s,0.755—0.746s和2.078s及每秒7.6个节拍.鸣声谱的主峰频率(MPF)和MPF下降20db的带宽分别为5223±79Hz和(4498±82)—(5656±68)Hz.正在歌唱的蟋蟀鸣声基本上不受黑蝉自鸣声的影响,但黑蝉的前置自鸣声对蟋蟀鸣声波形有一定的影响.黑蝉的惊叫声不仅对蟋蟀鸣声波形有明显影响,而且时间特性有一定影响,即(?)约缩短一半,(?)的变差明显扩大.但对频率特性都无影响.     

双斑蟋鸣声特征与行为关系的初步研究

利用计算机声分析技术对双斑蟋（Gryllus bimaculatus 1773)的召唤声、不同性比的求偶声和争斗声的结构、频谱与时域特征进行比较,以探讨鸣声特征与行为的关系。结果表明：①3种鸣声的脉冲时间长度（PL）、脉冲时间间隔（IPI）、每个脉冲群（PG）的脉冲数（PN）、声脉冲组合形态和密度等基本相同。这些特征参数较为稳定,为种间鉴别因子,其中以IPI为最。②节奏（Rh)、声长（SL）、间歇（IT）特征与蟋蟀的社会活动和个体活动有密切联系。从雄性单独生活时的召唤声到有雌性存在时的求偶声,每个节奏中的音节数逐渐增加,从单音节、双音节到多音节;SL、IT呈下降趋势。不同性比条件下,雄性数量明显影响鸣声特征。雄性数目增加,Rh、SL呈上升趋势;IT呈下降趋势。不同比例的雌性对雄性鸣声的影响无明显规律。③鸣声的频谱与时域呈一定对应关系。召唤声、求偶声和争斗声的脉冲能量主要集中在1个能量区上,表现出种的同一性。     

黑蚱蝉(Cryptotympana atrata Fabricius)鸣声的波谱特征

本文研究了双气囊黑蚱蝉的Click声、自鸣声和群鸣声.其鸣声波形兼有调幅与鸣声主频变化特征.1.Click声主峰频率分布在2.64—5.73KHz之间.2.自鸣声主峰频率在3.6—6KHz之间,比Click声的分布宽度略窄.3.群鸣声的主峰频率分布在4—7KHz范围内.     

繁殖期内丹顶鹤的日常短鸣声行为模式分析

繁殖期内,丹顶鹤(Grus japonensis)的日常短鸣声行为具有一定的模式。本文通过行为的实时观察,并利用MATLAB分析软件对日常短鸣声进行了计算机声谱分析,给出了鸣声模式的声图、示波图和频谱。结果表明：雄性的鸣声特性是每个单次叫声中含有的音节数较少,一般不超过4个音节;而雌性的鸣声特性是每个单次叫声中含有的音节数较多,最少的含有4个音节。雌雄鸣声的共同特性是每个音节都是由三个声脉冲组成。l号鹤的谐和特性较好,2号音色较纯净;雌性鸣肌速率较高,雄性则较低。自由选择配对组配偶间音质是一纯一杂,而人为组合组雌雄音质相同。     

丹顶鹤性活动的声行为研究

丹顶鹤繁殖期的性活动可分为雄鹤求偶、雌鹤对雄性求偶的应答、两性交配和交配完结4个阶段,其相应的鸣声模式分别为雄性的求偶鸣声、雌性对雄性求偶的应答声和两性的对鸣声、两性对唱的交配声和两性的高声合唱。4个阶段鸣声都是以基本音的主频率(PF)为主音的单音调声,前3个阶段都带数个近似fn=nf0(f0=FP)关系的低幅值谐频成分。第4个阶段带数个近似fn=nf0(f0=FP)关系的高幅值谐频成分;品质因数(Q3dB)多半为4～6,声脉冲重复频率(RFP)一般为150～180Hz,而第2阶段声的RFP一般为180～260Hz。雄性鸣声的每个单次叫声中含有的音节数较少,一般不超过4个;而雌性鸣声比较复杂。每个单次叫声中含有的音节数较多,一般都在7～8个以上;但雌雄鸣声的每个音节都是由3个声脉冲组成。雄鹤鸣唱声频率变化范围较小,而雌鹤鸣唱声频率变化形式是由低到高达到高峰后又开始下降。4个阶段的鸣声都具有较好共鸣。只有第2阶段发声运动较快。而且发现雄鹤鸣唱单次鸣叫声的音节数“增多”。各阶段鸣声特性均存在差异,不同配偶间均存在显著差异,研究结果表明丹顶鹤雌雄都具有不同的鸣声,且其性活动过程中不同的鸣声行为具有较高的个体识别信号潜能。另外,求偶鸣叫声和求偶应答与对鸣声在性活动鸣声中起着决定性的作用。     

蚱蝉(Cryptotympana atrata Fabricius)发声器结构:发声膜与鸣声

蚱蝉单发声膜发出的click声波形由高幅值和低幅脉冲列(pulse train,PT)组成.高幅值PT含脉冲越多,主峰频率(main peak frequency,MPF)就越高.本文进一步阐明:1、高幅值PT多含有11个脉冲,当含有1,2,3个时,脉冲个数与MPF成准线性关系 超过三个为非线性关系.2、双发声膜发声的频带主要在2700Hz-6700Hz之间.数个click声组成的波形中,低幅值PT功率谱包络波近似于标准高斯型,MPF约为4900Hz;不同高幅值PT内含主脉冲的频率不同是MPF变化的主要因素.3、蚱蝉鸣声功率谱主要有三个子谱区A,B,及C,对应的频带依次约为2700Hz—3700Hz,3700Hz-5700Hz,及5700Hz—6700Hz.     

蝉鸣特征及其在分类学上的意义：同翅目：蝉总科

本文总结了蝉鸣的几种机制,并初步提出了具鼓膜发音器的蝉鸣模式图;综述了国内外有关蝉鸣在分类中的应用历史和现状;分析讨论了蝉鸣声在各级分类阶元中的差异和应用,即发音机制和方式可用于科及亚科级的分类;鸣声的颖谱特征和一些鸣叫行为可为属级分类提供一些依据,鸣叫节律型具有明显的种性,而音色的差异在近缘种,疑难种及其种下分类方面具有重要的意义。     

Auditory nerve and interneurone responses to natural sounds in several species of cicadas

ABSTRACT. The calling and courtship songs of 17-year cicadas and of Say's cicadas differ both in the sound frequency spectrum and in temporal pattern. Multiunit recordings with hook electrodes from the whole auditory nerve show that the hearing organs are especially sensitive to transient stimuli occurring in natural sounds. Artificially produced clicks elicit bursts of spikes synchronized among various primary sensory fibres. These fibres respond to natural calling and courtship songs with a specificity dependent on carrier frequency, rhythm and transient content of the sound, following sound pulses (i.e. tymbal actions) up to repetition rates of 200 Hz. An ascending, plurisegmental interneurone was characterized by intracellular recording and simultaneously stained with cobalt. Its main arborization spatially overlaps the anterior part of the sensory auditory neuropile, and the axon was traced as far as the prothoracic ganglion. Direct input from primary auditory fibres was suggested by latency measurements. Intracellular recordings from such neurons in different species show distinct auditory input, with phasic-tonic spike responses to tones. In general, the interneurone response is more species-specific to calling than to courtship songs, and the preferential response to the conspecific calling song is based primarily upon sound frequency content.     

Specificity of cicada calling songs in the genus Tibicina (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

Abstract.  Males of Tibicina cicada species produce a sustained and monotonous calling song by tymbal activity. This acoustic signal constitutes the first step in pair formation, attracting females at long range, and is involved in male–male interactions. The specificity of this signal was investigated for the first time for seven species and one subspecies of Tibicina occurring in France. This analysis was achieved by describing tymbal anatomy, tymbal mechanism and calling song structure. Male calling songs are emitted following the same general scheme: tymbals are activated alternately and the successive buckling of the sclerotized ribs that they bear produces a regular succession of groups of pulses. The structural and mechanical properties shared by Tibicina species and subspecies lead to a considerable uniformity of the signal shape. Nevertheless, a principal component analysis applied to eight temporal and three frequency parameters revealed differences between the signals of the species studied. In particular, calling songs differed in groups of pulse rate and/or in peak of the second frequency band (carrier frequency). These acoustic differences are probably linked to differences in the numbers of tymbal ribs and body size. Groups of pulse rate and/or peak of the second frequency band could encode specific information. However, Tibicina calling songs may not act as distinct specific-mate recognition systems and may not play a leading role in the mating isolation process; rather, they might merely belong to a complex set of specific spatial, ecological, ethological and morphological characters that ensure syngamy.     

How Do “Mute” Cicadas Produce Their Calling Songs?

Insects have evolved a variety of structures and mechanisms to produce sounds, which are used for communication both within and between species. Among acoustic insects, cicada males are particularly known for their loud and diverse sounds which function importantly in communication. The main method of sound production in cicadas is the tymbal mechanism, and a relative small number of cicada species possess both tymbal and stridulatory organs. However, cicadas of the genus Karenia do not have any specialized sound-producing structures, so they are referred to as “mute”. This denomination is quite misleading, as they indeed produce sounds. Here, we investigate the sound-producing mechanism and acoustic communication of the “mute” cicada, Karenia caelatata, and discover a new sound-production mechanism for cicadas: i.e., K. caelatata produces impact sounds by banging the forewing costa against the operculum. The temporal, frequency and amplitude characteristics of the impact sounds are described. Morphological studies and reflectance-based analyses reveal that the structures involved in sound production of K. caelatata (i.e., forewing, operculum, cruciform elevation, and wing-holding groove on scutellum) are all morphologically modified. Acoustic playback experiments and behavioral observations suggest that the impact sounds of K. caelatata are used in intraspecific communication and function as calling songs. The new sound-production mechanism expands our knowledge on the diversity of acoustic signaling behavior in cicadas and further underscores the need for more bioacoustic studies on cicadas which lack tymbal mechanism.     

棺头蟋属六种常见蟋蟀鸣声特征分析与种类鉴定(直翅目:蟋蟀总科)

本文对蟋蟀科Ｇｒｙｌｉｄａｅ棺头蟋属Ｌｏｘｏｂｌｅｍｍｕｓ６种常见种类的鸣声特征进行了较为系统的分析研究。从其频域特征和时域特征上明显地显示了种间差异,并将其鸣声特征用于分类。     

Directional characteristics of the auditory system of cicadas: is the sound producing tymbal an integral part of directional hearing?

Abstract. Directional hearing is investigated in males of two species of cicadas, Tympanistalna gastrica (Stål) and Tettigetta josei Boulard, that are similar in size but show different calling song spectra. The vibrational response of the ears is measured with laser vibrometry and compared with thresholds determined from auditory nerve recordings. The data are used to investigate to what extent the directional characteristic of the tympanal vibrations is encoded by the activity of auditory receptors. Laser measurements show complex vibrations of the tympanum, and reveal that directional differences are rather high (>15 dB) in characteristic but limited frequency ranges. At low frequencies, both species show a large directional difference at the same frequency (3–5 kHz) whereas, above 10 kHz, the directional differences correspond to the different resonant frequencies of the respective tymbals. Consequently, due to the mechanical resonance of the tymbal, the frequency range at which directional differences are high differs between the two species that otherwise show similar dimensions of the acoustic system. The directional differences observed in the tympanal vibrations are also observed in the auditory nerve activity. These recordings confirm that the biophysically determined directional differences are available within the nervous system for further processing. Despite considerable intra as well as interindividual variability, the ears of the cicadas investigated here exhibit profound directional characteristics, because the thresholds determined from recordings of the auditory nerve at 30° to the right and left of the longitudinal axis differ by more than 5 dB.     

SOUND PRODUCTION AND SOUND EMISSION IN SEVEN SPECIES OF EUROPEAN TETTIGONIIDS. PART I. THE DIFFERENT PARAMETERS OF THE SONG; THEIR RELATION TO THE MORPHOLOGY OF THE BUSHCRICKET

Abstract

Comparative studies of sound production and sound emission in seven species of European tettigoniids have been carried out. The species chosen were two Tettigoniines (Tettigonia cantans, Tettigonia viridissima), two Ephippigerines (Ephippiger discoidalis, Ephippiger ephippiger), and three Decticines (Decticus albifrons, Decticus verrucivorus, Psorodonotus illyricus). The factors which determined the choice of species were the different morphology (for example body shape and weight, and wing size) of the three subfamilies. The parameters of the different songs (e.g. dominant frequency, intensity) are normally not correlated to any of the investigated morphological characteristics of the animals. In the brachypterous species intraspecific correlations exist between wing size and the dominant low frequency band of the call. This frequency band is also observable at related higher frequencies in the ultrasonic range (20–60 kHz), the observed band width increasing with frequency. Sound emission in all species is to some extent directional. This directionality is related to body size and wing structure. The song structure of the different species does not appear to be related to any observable characteristic of the habitat of die animals. A possible exception may be the song of Psorodonotus illyricus with a particularly low dominant frequency band. The phylogenetic development of the songs seems to be determined by relationships between the different species rather than to any factors contributed by the habitat.