Membrane fusion mechanisms: the influenza hemagglutinin paradigm and its implications for intracellular fusion

The mechanism of membrane fusion induced by the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) has been extensively characterized. Fusion is triggered by low pH, which induces conformational changes in the protein, leading to insertion of a hydrophobic 'fusion peptide' into the viral membrane and the target membrane for fusion. Insertion perturbs the target membrane, and hour glass-shaped lipidic fusion intermediates, called stalks, fusing the outer monolayers of the two membranes, are formed. Stalk formation is followed by complete fusion of the two membranes. Structures similar to those formed by HA at the pH of fusion are found not only in many other viral fusion proteins, but are also formed by SNAREs, proteins involved in intracellular fusion. Substances that inhibit or promote HA-induced fusion because they affect stalk formation, also inhibit or promote intracellular fusion, cell–cell fusion and even intracellular fission similarly. Therefore, the mechanism of influenza HA-induced fusion may be a paradigm for many intracellular fusion events.     

Membrane Fusion

The fusion of biological membranes results in two bilayer-based membranes merging into a single membrane. In this process the lipids have to undergo considerable rearrangement. The nature of the intermediates that are formed during this rearrangement has been investigated. Certain fusion proteins facilitate this process. In many cases short segments of these fusion proteins have a particularly important role in accelerating the fusion process. Studies of the interaction of model peptides with membranes have allowed for increased understanding at the molecular level of the mechanism of the promotion of membrane fusion by fusion proteins. There is an increased appreciation of the roles of several independent segments of fusion proteins in promoting the fusion process.Many of the studies of the fusion of biological membranes have been done with the fusion of enveloped viruses with other membranes. One reason for this is that the number of proteins involved in viral fusion is relatively simple, often requiring only a single protein. For many enveloped viruses, the structure of their fusion proteins has certain common elements, suggesting that they all promote fusion by an analogous mechanism. Some aspects of this mechanism also appears to be common to intracellular fusion, although several proteins are involved in that process which is more complex and regulated than is fusion.     

Common Properties of Fusion Peptides from Diverse Systems

Although membrane fusion occurs ubiquitously and continuously in alleukaroytic cells, little is known about the mechanism that governs lipidbilayer fusion associated with any intracellular fusion reactions. Recentstudies of the fusion of enveloped viruses with host cell membranes havehelped to define the fusion process. The identification and characterizationof key proteins involved in fusion reactions have mainly driven recent advancesin our understanding of membrane fusion. The most important denominator amongthe fusion proteins is the fusion peptide. In this review, work done in thelast few years on the molecular mechanism of viral membrane fusion will behighlighted, focusing in particular on the role of the fusion peptide and themodification of the lipid bilayer structure. Much of what is known regardingthe molecular mechanism of viral membrane fusion has been gained using liposomesas model systems in which the molecular components of the membrane and the environmentare strictly controlled. Many amphilphilic peptides have a high affinity forlipid bilayers, but only a few sequences are able to induce membrane fusion. Thepresence of -helical structure in at least part of the fusion peptideis strongly correlated with activity whereas, -structure tends to beless prevalent, associated with non-native experimental conditions, and morerelated to vesicle aggregation than fusion. The specific angle of insertionof the peptides into the membrane plane is also found to be an importantcharacteristic for the fusion process. A shallow penetration, extending onlyto the central aliphatic core region, is likely responsible for the destabilization ofthe lipids required for coalescence of the apposing membranes and fusion.     

膜融合机制研究进展

膜的融合是一个基本的生命过程,在生物的生长发育中有着重要作用。通过融合,两套独立的双层脂分子合二为一,完成一定的生物功能。膜融合分子机制的关键在于其主要成分：融合蛋白。Ⅰ、Ⅱ类病毒融合蛋白形成“发夹”,胞内囊泡与目标膜各提供的融合蛋白形成“类亮氨酸拉链”,这些结构将独立的膜拉近,继而促使膜合为一体。细胞与细胞间融合蛋白的作用机制目前还未明确,在各种膜融合中,脂双层的变化可能是类似的,但介导融合的分子机制应该是不同的。目前,对于膜融合很多方面的理解还停留在假说阶段。理解了膜融合的过程和分子机制不仅将极大地促进生物学的发展,更重要是将为相关的疾病治疗打下坚实的基础。     

Syntaxin 6: the promiscuous behaviour of a SNARE protein

Vesicle flow within the cell is responsible for the dynamic maintenance of and communication between intracellular compartments. In addition, vesicular transport is crucial for communication between the cell and its surrounding environment. The ability of a vesicle to recognise and fuse with an appropriate compartment or vesicle is determined by its protein and lipid composition as well as by proteins in the cytosol. SNARE proteins present on both vesicle as well as target organelle membranes provide one component necessary for the process of membrane fusion. While in mammalian cells the main focus of interest about SNARE function has centred on those involved in exocytosis, recent data on SNAREs involved in intracellular membrane-trafficking steps have provided a deeper insight into the properties of these proteins. We take, as an example, the promiscuous SNARE syntaxin 6, a SNARE involved in multiple membrane fusion events. The properties of syntaxin 6 reveal similarities but also differences in the behaviour of intracellular SNAREs and the highly specialised exocytotic SNARE molecules.     

Plasma membrane targeting of exocytic SNARE proteins

SNARE proteins play a central role in the process of intracellular membrane fusion. Indeed, the interaction of SNAREs present on two opposing membranes is generally believed to provide the driving force to initiate membrane fusion. Eukaryotic cells express a large number of SNARE isoforms, and the function of individual SNAREs is required for specific intracellular fusion events. Exocytosis, the fusion of secretory vesicles with the plasma membrane, employs the proteins syntaxin and SNAP-25 as plasma membrane SNAREs. As a result, exocytosis is dependent upon the targeting of these proteins to the plasma membrane; however, the mechanisms that underlie trafficking of exocytic syntaxin and SNAP-25 proteins to the cell surface are poorly understood. The intracellular trafficking itinerary of these proteins is particularly intriguing as syntaxins are tail-anchored (or Type IV) membrane proteins, whereas SNAP-25 is anchored to membranes via a central palmitoylated domain-there is no common consensus for the trafficking of such proteins within the cell. In this review, we discuss the plasma membrane targeting of these essential exocytic SNARE proteins.     

Membrane fusion of enveloped viruses: Especially a matter of proteins

To infect mammalian cells, enveloped viruses have to deposit their nucleocapsids into the cytoplasm of a host cell. Membrane fusion represents a key element in this entry mechanism. The fusion activity resides in specific, virally encoded membrane glycoproteins. Some molecular properties of these fusion proteins will be briefly described. These properties will then be correlated to the ability of a virus to fuse with target membranes, and to induce cell-cell fusion. Some molecular and physical parameters affecting virus fusion—at the level of either viral or target membrane or both—and the significance of modelling virus fusion by using synthetic peptides resembling viral fusion peptides, will also be discussed.     

Membrane fusion by VAMP3 and plasma membrane t-SNAREs

Pairing of SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor) proteins on vesicles (v-SNAREs) and SNARE proteins on target membranes (t-SNAREs) mediates intracellular membrane fusion. VAMP3/cellubrevin is a v-SNARE that resides in recycling endosomes and endosome-derived transport vesicles. VAMP3 has been implicated in recycling of transferrin receptors, secretion of alpha-granules in platelets, and membrane trafficking during cell migration. Using a cell fusion assay, we examined membrane fusion capacity of the ternary complexes formed by VAMP3 and plasma membrane t-SNAREs syntaxin1, syntaxin4, SNAP-23 and SNAP-25. VAMP3 forms fusogenic pairing with t-SNARE complexes syntaxin1/SNAP-25, syntaxin1/SNAP-23 and syntaxin4/SNAP-25, but not with syntaxin4/SNAP-23. Deletion of the N-terminal domain of syntaxin4 enhanced membrane fusion more than two fold, indicating that the N-terminal domain negatively regulates membrane fusion. Differential membrane fusion capacities of the ternary v-/t-SNARE complexes suggest that transport vesicles containing VAMP3 have distinct membrane fusion kinetics with domains of the plasma membrane that present different t-SNARE proteins.     

Functional Domains within Fusion Proteins: Prospectives for Development of Peptide Inhibitors of Viral Cell Fusion

The entry of enveloped viruses into host cells is accomplished by fusion ofthe viral envelope and target plasma membrane and is mediated by fusionproteins. Recently, several functional domains within fusion proteins fromdifferent viral families were identified. Some are directly involved inconformational changes after receptor binding, as suggested by the recentrelease of crystallographically determined structures of a highly stablecore structure of the fusion proteins in the absence of membranes. However,in the presence of membranes, this core binds strongly to the membrane'ssurface and dissociates therein. Other regions, besides the N-terminal fusionpeptide, which include the core region and an internal fusion peptide inparamyxoviruses, are directly involved in the actual membrane fusion event,suggesting an umbrella like model for the membrane inducedconformational change of fusion proteins. Peptides resembling these regionshave been shown to have specific antiviral activity, presumably because theyinterfere with the corresponding domains within the viruses. Overall, thesestudies shed light into the molecular mechanism of membrane fusion induced byenvelope glycoproteins and suggest that fusion proteins from different viralfamilies share common structural and functional motifs.     

Local electrostatic interactions determine the diameter of fusion pores

In regulated exocytosis vesicular and plasma membranes merge to form a fusion pore in response to stimulation. The nonselective cation HCN channels are involved in the regulation of unitary exocytotic events by at least 2 mechanisms. They can affect SNARE-dependent exocytotic activity indirectly, via the modulation of free intracellular calcium; and/or directly, by altering local cation concentration, which affects fusion pore geometry likely via electrostatic interactions. By monitoring membrane capacitance, we investigated how extracellular cation concentration affects fusion pore diameter in pituitary cells and astrocytes. At low extracellular divalent cation levels predominantly transient fusion events with widely open fusion pores were detected. However, fusion events with predominately narrow fusion pores were present at elevated levels of extracellular trivalent cations. These results show that electrostatic interactions likely help determine the stability of discrete fusion pore states by affecting fusion pore membrane composition.     

Local electrostatic interactions determine the diameter of fusion pores

In regulated exocytosis vesicular and plasma membranes merge to form a fusion pore in response to stimulation. The nonselective cation HCN channels are involved in the regulation of unitary exocytotic events by at least 2 mechanisms. They can affect SNARE-dependent exocytotic activity indirectly, via the modulation of free intracellular calcium; and/or directly, by altering local cation concentration, which affects fusion pore geometry likely via electrostatic interactions. By monitoring membrane capacitance, we investigated how extracellular cation concentration affects fusion pore diameter in pituitary cells and astrocytes. At low extracellular divalent cation levels predominantly transient fusion events with widely open fusion pores were detected. However, fusion events with predominately narrow fusion pores were present at elevated levels of extracellular trivalent cations. These results show that electrostatic interactions likely help determine the stability of discrete fusion pore states by affecting fusion pore membrane composition.     

Trypanosoma cruzi: fusogenic ability of membranes from cultured epimastigotes in interaction with human syncytiotrophoblast

Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes cultured in vitro were disrupted by successive freezing and thawing and subsequent sonication. The total homogenate was fractionated by differential centrifugation to obtain an enriched plasma membrane fraction. The proteins of subcellular parasite fractions were labeled with 131I and their binding to membrane fractions from human placenta syncytiotrophoblast was studied. Syncytiotrophoblast fractions enriched in plasma showed higher specific activity for binding an enriched T. cruzi plasma membrane fraction compared with other fractions of syncytiotrophoblast. The properties of this interaction were studied with digestive enzymes (trypsin and phospholipase A2). The results showed that both proteins and lipids could be involved in this interaction. The Ca2+ requirements for the membrane-membrane interaction are different for the two membranes studied. Also the enriched plasma membrane T. cruzi fraction had a higher capacity to induce fusion processes than the other subcellular fractions. The above results indicate that a preferential syncytiotrophoblast-T. cruzi interaction may occur between the two cell surfaces as compared to intracellular membranes and that the parasite surface is able to induce an instability process leading to membrane fusion. These results may have implications in regard to the mechanism of entry of the parasite into cells.     

Connection of the mitochondrial outer and inner membranes by Fzo1 is critical for organellar fusion

Mitochondrial membrane fusion is a process essential for the maintenance of the structural integrity of the organelle. Since mitochondria are bounded by a double membrane, they face the challenge of fusing four membranes in a coordinated manner. We provide evidence that this is achieved by coupling of the mitochondrial outer and inner membranes by the mitochondrial fusion machinery. Fzo1, the first known mediator of mitochondrial fusion, spans the outer membrane twice, exposing a short loop to the intermembrane space. The presence of the intermembrane space segment is required for the localization of Fzo1 in sites of tight contact between the mitochondrial outer and inner membranes. Mutations in the intermembrane space domain of yeast Fzo1 relieve the association with the inner membrane. This results in a loss of function of the protein in vivo. We propose that the mitochondrial fusion machinery forms membrane contact sites that mediate mitochondrial fusion. A fusion machinery that is in contact with both mitochondrial membranes appears to be functionally important for coordinated fusion of four mitochondrial membranes.     

Lipids in biological membrane fusion

The results reviewed suggest that membrane fusion in diverse biological fusion reactions involves formation of some specific intermediates: stalks and pores. Energy of these intermediates and, consequently, the rate and extent of fusion depend on the propensity of the corresponding monolayers of membranes to bend in the required directions.Proteins and peptides can control the bending energy of membrane monolayers in a number of ways. Monolayer lipid composition may be altered by different phospholipases [50, 85, 90], flipases and translocases [4, 50]. Proteins and peptides can change monolayer spontaneous curvature or hydrophobic void energy by direct interaction with membrane lipids [20, 32, 111]. Proteins may also provide some barriers for lipid diffusion in the plane of the monolayer [83, 141]. If diffusion of lipids at some specific membrane sites (e.g., in the vicinity of fusion protein) is somehow hindered, the energy of the bent fusion intermediates would reflect the elastic properties of these particular sites rather than the spontaneous curvature of the whole monolayers. Proteins may deform membranes while bringing them locally into close contact. The alteration of the geometric (external) curvature will certainly change the elastic energy of the initial state and, thus affect the energetic barriers of the formation of the intermediates [143]. In addition, the area and the energy of the stalk can be reduced by preliminary bending of the contacting membranes [111]. The possible effects of proteins and polymers on local elastic properties and local shapes of the membranes have been recently analyzed [22, 39, 45, 63]. These studies may provide a good basis for future development of theoretical models of protein-mediated fusion.     

Conversion of plasma membrane topology during epithelial tube connection requires Arf-like 3 small GTPase in Drosophila

The development of tubular organs often involves the hollowing of cells into a torus (doughnut shape), as observed in blood vessel formation in vertebrates and tracheal development in insects. During the fusion of Drosophila tracheal branches, fusion cells located at the tip of migrating branches contact each other and form intracellular luminal cavities on opposite sides of the cells that open to connect the tubule lumens. This process involves the intracellular fusion of plasma membranes associated with microtubule tracks. Here, we studied the function of an evolutionarily conserved small GTPase, Arf-like 3, in branch fusion. Arf-like 3 is N-terminally acetylated, and associates with both intracellular vesicles and microtubules. In Arf-like 3 mutants, the cell adhesion of fusion cells, specification of apical membrane domains, and secretion of luminal extracellular matrix proceeded normally, but the luminal cavities did not open due to the failure of intracellular fusion of the plasma membranes. We present evidence that the Arf-like 3 mutation impairs the localized assembly of the exocyst complex, suggesting that the targeting of exocytosis machinery to specific apical domains is the key step in converting the plasma membrane topology in fusion cells.     

Membrane fusion: a structural perspective on the interplay of lipids and proteins

The fusion of biological membranes is governed by the carefully orchestrated interplay of membrane proteins and lipids. Recently determined structures of fusion proteins, individual domains of fusion proteins and their complexes with regulatory proteins and membrane lipids have yielded much suggestive insight into how viral and intracellular membrane fusion might proceed. These structures may be combined with new knowledge on the fusion of pure lipid bilayer membranes in an attempt to begin to piece together the complex puzzle of how biological membrane fusion machines operate on membranes.     

Structures and Mechanisms of Viral Membrane Fusion Proteins: Multiple Variations on a Common Theme

Recent work has identified three distinct classes of viral membrane fusion proteins based on structural criteria. In addition, there are at least four distinct mechanisms by which viral fusion proteins can be triggered to undergo fusion-inducing conformational changes. Viral fusion proteins also contain different types of fusion peptides and vary in their reliance on accessory proteins. These differing features combine to yield a rich diversity of fusion proteins. Yet despite this staggering diversity, all characterized viral fusion proteins convert from a fusion-competent state (dimers or trimers, depending on the class) to a membrane-embedded homotrimeric prehairpin, and then to a trimer-of-hairpins that brings the fusion peptide, attached to the target membrane, and the transmembrane domain, attached to the viral membrane, into close proximity thereby facilitating the union of viral and target membranes. During these conformational conversions, the fusion proteins induce membranes to progress through stages of close apposition, hemifusion, and then the formation of small, and finally large, fusion pores. Clearly, highly divergent proteins have converged on the same overall strategy to mediate fusion, an essential step in the life cycle of every enveloped virus.     

囊膜病毒膜融合分子机制研究进展

囊膜病毒通过病毒与宿主细胞膜融合的方式感染宿主,病毒囊膜蛋白介导了膜融合过程。根据这些囊膜蛋白在病毒囊膜表面的排列、蛋白结构及其在融合肽中的位置不同,可将囊膜病毒分为三类,其利用这些囊膜特殊的蛋白分子与受体相互作用完成膜融合。在分子水平上研究这一过程有助于认识病毒侵染的本质和发现关键环节,达到预防与治疗病毒病的目的。     

Lipids as modulators of membrane fusion mediated by viral fusion proteins

Enveloped viruses infect host cells by fusion of viral and target membranes. This fusion event is triggered by specific glycoproteins in the viral envelope. Fusion glycoproteins belong to either class I, class II or the newly described third class, depending upon their arrangement at the surface of the virion, their tri-dimensional structure and the location within the protein of a short stretch of hydrophobic amino acids called the fusion peptide, which is able to induce the initial lipid destabilization at the onset of fusion. Viral fusion occurs either with the plasma membrane for pH-independent viruses, or with the endosomal membranes for pH-dependent viruses. Although, viral fusion proteins are parted in three classes and the subcellular localization of fusion might vary, these proteins have to act, in common, on lipid assemblies. Lipids contribute to fusion through their physical, mechanical and/or chemical properties. Lipids can thus play a role as chemically defined entities, or through their preferential partitioning into membrane microdomains called "rafts", or by modulating the curvature of the membranes involved in the fusion process. The purpose of this review is to make a state of the art on recent findings on the contribution of cholesterol, sphingolipids and glycolipids in cell entry and membrane fusion of a number of viral families, whose members bear either class I or class II fusion proteins, or fusion proteins of the recently discovered third class.     

Interaction between dengue virus fusion peptide and lipid bilayers depends on peptide clustering

Dengue fever is one of the most widespread tropical diseases in the world. The disease is caused by a virus member of the Flaviviridae family, a group of enveloped positive sense single-stranded RNA viruses. Dengue virus infection is mediated by virus glycoprotein E, which binds to the cell surface. After uptake by endocytosis, this protein induces the fusion between viral envelope and endosomal membrane at the acidic environment of the endosomal compartment. In this work, we evaluated by steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy the interaction between the peptide believed to be the dengue virus fusion peptide and large unilamellar vesicles, studying the extent of partition, fusion capacity and depth of insertion in membranes. The roles of the bilayer composition (neutral and anionic phospholipids), ionic strength and pH of the medium were also studied. Our results indicate that dengue virus fusion peptide has a high affinity to vesicles composed of anionic lipids and that the interaction is mainly electrostatic. Both partition coefficient and fusion index are enhanced by negatively charged phospholipids. The location determined by differential fluorescence quenching using lipophilic probes demonstrated that the peptide is in an intermediate depth in the hemilayers, in-between the bilayer core and its surface. Ultimately, these data provide novel insights on the interaction between dengue virus fusion peptide and its target membranes, namely, the role of oligomerization and specific types of membranes.