The reduction of xylose to xylitol by Candida guilliermondii and Candida parapsilosis: Incidence of oxygen and pH

Summary The ability of C. guilliermondii and C. parapsilosis to ferment xylose to xylitol was evaluated under different oxygen transfer rates in order to enhance the xylitol yield. In C. guilliermondii, a maximal xylitol yield of 0.66 g/g was obtained when oxygen transfer rate was 2.2 mmol/l.h. Optimal conditions to produce xylitol by C. parapsilosis (0.75 g/g) arose from cultures at pH 4.75 with 0.4 mmoles of oxygen/l.h. The response of the yeasts to anaerobic conditions has shown that oxygen was required for xylose metabolism.Nomenclature max maximum specific growth rate (per hour) - qSmax maximum specific rate of xylose consumption (g xylose per g dry biomass per hour) - qpmax maximum specific productivity of xylitol (g xylitol per g dry biomass per hour) - Qp average volumetric productivity of xylitol (g xylitol per liter per hour) - Y_P/S xylitol yield (g xylitol per g substrate utilized) - Y_P'/S glycerol yield (g glycerol per g substrate utilized) - Y_X/S biomass yield (g dry biomass per g substrate utilized)     

Xylitol production from D-xylose byCandida guillermondii: Fermentation behaviour

Summary The ability ofCandida guillermondii to produce xylitol from xylose and to ferment individual non xylose hemicellulosic derived sugars was investigated in microaerobic conditions. Xylose was converted into xylitol with a yield of 0,63 g/g and ethanol was produced in negligible amounts. The strain did not convert glucose, mannose and galactose into their corresponding polyols but only into ethanol and cell mass. By contrast, fermentation of arabinose lead to the formation of arabitol. On D-xylose medium,Candida guillermondii exhibited high yield and rate of xylitol production when the initial sugar concentration exceeded 110 g/l. A final xylitol concentration of 221 g/l was obtained from 300 g/l D-xylose with a yield of 82,6% of theoretical and an average specific rate of 0,19 g/g.h.Nomenclature Q_p average volumetric productivity of xylitol (g xylitol/l per hour) - q_p average specific productivity of xylitol (g xylitol/g of cells per hour) - So initial xylose concentration (g/l) - tf incubation time (hours) - Y_P/S xylitol yield (g of xylitol produced/g of xylose utilized) - Y_E/S ethanol yield (g of ethanol produced/g of substrate utilized) - Y_X/S cells yield (g of cells/g of substrate utilized) - specific growth rate coefficient (h^–1) - _max maximum specific growth rate coefficient (h^–1)     

Xylitol formation by Candida boidinii in oxygen limited chemostat culture

Summary Production of xylitol by Candida boidinii NRRL Y-17213 occurs under conditions of an oxygen limitation. The extent to which substrate is converted to xylitol and its coproducts (ethanol, other polyols, acetic acid), and the relative flow rates of substrate to energetic and biosynthetic pathways is controlled by the degree of oxygen limitation.With decrease in oxygen concentration in the inlet gas, for a constant dilution rate of 0.05 1/h. the specific oxygen uptake rate decreased from 1.30 to 0.36 mmol/gh Xylitol was not produced at specific oxygen uptake rates above 0.91 mmol/gh. Upon shift to lower oxygen rates, specific xylitol production rate increased more rapidly than specific ethanol production rate:Nomenclature D dilution rate (1/h) - DOT dissolved oxygen tension (%) - m_o2 maintenance coefficient (mmol O₂/g cell mass h) - q_o2 specific oxygen uptake rate (mmol O₂/g cell mass h) - q_s specific xylose uptake rate (g xylose/g cell mass h) or (mmol xylose/g cell mass h) - q_x specific xylitol production rate (g xylitol/ g cell mass h) or (mmol xylitol/ g cell mass h) - q_e specific ethanol production rate (g ethanol/ g cell mass h) or (mmol ethanol/ g cell mass h) - q_CO2 specific carbon dioxide production rate (mmol CO₂/g cell mass h) - S xylose concentration (g/1) - Y_cm/s cell mass yield coefficient, (g cell mass/mmol xylose) or (g cell mass/ g xylose consumed) - Y_cm/O2 cell mass yield coefficient, (g cell mass/mmol O₂) - Y_X/S xylitol yield coefficient (g xylitol/g xylose consumed) - Y_x/O2 xylitol yield coefficient (g xylitol/mmol O₂) - Y_e/s ethanol yield coefficient (g ethanol/g xylose consumed) - OUR oxygen uptake rate (mmol O₂/1h) - specific growth rate (1/h)     

Fermentation ofd-xylose,d-glucose andl-arabinose mixture byPichia stipitis Y 7124: sugar tolerance

Summary The effect of substrate concentration (S ₀) on the fermentation parameters of a sugar mixture byPichia stipitis Y 7124 was investigated under anaerobic and microaerobic conditions. Under microaerobiosisP. stipitis maintained high ethanol yield and productivity when initial substrate concentration did not exceed 150 g/l; ethanol yield of about 0.40 g/g and volumetric productivity up to 0.39 g/l per hour were obtained. Optimal specific ethanol productivity (0.2 g/g per hour) was observed withS ₀=110 g/l. Under anaerobic conditionsP. stipitis exhibited the highest fermentative performances atS ₀=20 g/l; it produced ethanol with a yield of 0.42 g/g, with a specific rate of 1.1 g/g per day. When the initial substrate level increased, specific ethanol productivity declined gradually and ethanol yield was dependent on the degree of utilization of each sugar in the mixture.Abbreviations E _m maximum produced ethanol (g/l) - E ₀ initial ethanol (g/l) - E _v evaporated ethanol (g/l) - Q _p volumetric productivity of ethanol (g ethanol/l per hour or g/l per day) - q _p specific productivity of ethanol (g ethanol/g cells per hour) - q _pm maximum specific productivity of ethanol (g/l per hour) - S ₀ initial substrate concentration (g/l) - t _f time at which produced ethanol is maximum (h) - Y _p/s ethanol yield (g ethanol produced/g substrate utilized) - Y _x/s cell yeild (g cells produced/g substrate utilized) - Y _xo/xy xylitol yield (g xylitol produced/g xylose utilized) - probability coefficient - specific growth rate coefficient (h^-1 or d^-1)     

The effect of pH on kinetic and yield parameters during the ethanolic fermentation of D-xylose with Pachysolen tannophilus

We have studied the ethanolic fermentation of D-xylose with Pachysolen tannophilus in batch cultures. We propose a model to predict variations in D-xylose consumed, and biomass and ethanol produced, in which we include parameters for the specific growth rate, for the consumption of D-xylose and production of ethanol either related or not to growth.The ideal initial pH for ethanol production turned out to be 4.5. At this pH value the net specific growth rate was 0.26 h^–1, biomass yield was 0.16 g.g^–1, the cell-maintenance coefficient was 0.073 g.g^–1.h^–1, the parameter for ethanol production non-related to growth was 0.064 g.g^–1,h^–1 and the maximum ethanol yield was 0.32 g.g^–1.List of Symbols A _c Carbon atomic weight - a _d1/h Specific cell-maintenance rate defined in Eq. (8) - c Mass fraction of carbon in the biomass - E g/l Ethanol concentration - f _x Correction factor defined in Eq. (13) - f _x Correction factor defined in Eq. (13) - f _xi Correction factor defined in Eq. (14) - k _d1/h Death constant - M _E Ethanol molecular weight - M _s Xylose molecular weight - M _xi Xylitol molecular weight - m g xylose/g biomass Maintenance coefficient for substrate - m _dg xylose/g biomass Maintenance coefficient when k _d - q _Eg ethanol/g biomass. Specific ethanol production rate - s g/l Residual xylose concentration - s ₀ g/l Initial xylose concentration - t h Time - x g/l Biomass concentration - x ₀ g/l Initial biomass concentration - Y _E/sg ethanol/g xylose Instantaneous ethanol yield - ¯Y _E/sg ethanol/g xylose Mean ethanol yield - Y _E ^s/T g ethanol/g xylose Theoretical ethanol yield - Y _E ^s/* g ethanol/g xylose Corrected instantaneous ethanol yield - ¯Y _E ^s/* g ethanol/g xylose Corrected mean ethanol yield - Y _x/sg biomass/g xylose Biomass yield - ¯Y _xi/sg xylitol/g xylose Mean xylitol yield Greek Letters g ethanol/g biomass Growth-associated product formation parameter - g ethanol/g biomass.h Non-growth-associated product formation parameter - _dg ethanol/g biomass.h Non-growth-associated product formation parameter when k _d0 - h Variable defined in Eq. (6) or Eq. (7) - 1/h Specific growth rate - _m1/h Maximum specific growth rate     

Performance assessment of two patent strains ofZymomonas mobilis in batch and continuous fermentations

Summary The performance ofZymomonas mobilis strains ATCC 31821 and ATCC 31823 was assessed in batch and continuous culture. In batch culture using a medium containing 250 g/l glucose, identical maximum specific growth rates of 0.16/h were found, though final biomass concentration and growth yield were significantly lower for ATCC 31 823 than for ATCC 31 821. Final ethanol concentrations in this medium were about 110 g/l vor both organisms. In continuous culture at increasing dilution rates using a medium containing 100 g/l glucose, no significant differences were seen between the two strains with respect to the fermentation parameters studied. For ATCC 31 821, maximum rates of glucose uptake (Q_s) and ethanol produktion (Q_p) of 8.7 g glu/g/h and 4.4 g eth/g/h, respectively, were found. Both strains showed a similar performance at a fixed dilution rate of 0.1/h, where maximum ethanol concentrations of about 68 g/l were reached at a feed glucose concentration of about 139 g/l. At this dilution rate the maximum values of Q_s and Q_p were about 5.8 g glu/g/h and 2.8 g eth/g/h, respectively. Test tube experiments showed that growth, measured as optical density, decreased with increasing concentrations of exogenous ethanol with complete inhibition of growth at ethanol concentrations >8% (v/v). As evidenced by the results presented here, we have been unable to practice the invention as described in U.S. Patent 4,403,034 (Rogers and Tribe 1983).Nomenclature D Dilution rate, 1/h - _max maximum specific growth rate, 1/h - S_R Initial substrate concentration, g glucose/1 - S Residual substrate concentration, g glucose/1 - S₀ Effluent substrate concentration, g glucose/1 - X Blomass concentration; g cells/l - OD₆₂₀ Optical density at 620 nm, dimensionless - [P] Product concentration, g ethanol/1 - Y_x/s Growth yield, g cells/g glucose used - Y_p/s Product yield, g ethanol/g glucose used - %, Yield Percentage yield, Y_p/sx100/Y _p ^s/max =Y_p/sx100/0.51 - Q_s Specific rate of glucose uptake, g glucose/g cells/h - Q_p Specific rate of ethanol formation, g ethanol/g cells/h - m_e Maintenance energy coefficient, g glucose/g cells/h - VP Volumetric productivity, g ethanol/l/h - t Fermentation time, h     

Simultaneous fermentation and isomerization of xylose

Summary Ethanol was produced from xylose by converting the sugar to xylulose, using commercial xylose isomerases, and simultaneously converting the xylulose to ethanol by anaerobic fermentation using different yeast strains. The process was optimized with the yeast strain Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Y-164). The data show that the simultaneous fermentation and isomerization of 6% xylose can produce final ethanol concentrations of 2.1% w/v within 2 days at temperatures as high as 39°C.Nomenclature SFIX simultaneous fermentation and isomerization of xylose - V _p volumetric production (g ethanol·l^-1 per hour) - Q _p specific rate (g ethanol·g^-1 cells per hour) - Y _s yield from substrate consumed (g ethanol, g^-1 xylose) - ET ethanol concentration (% wt/vol) - XT xylitol concentration (% wt/vol) - Glu glucose - Xyl xylose - --m maximum - --f final     

Effect of xylitol on the metabolism and viability of Candida shehatae

Anaerobic D-xylose fermentations were performed with C. shehatate in the presence of 0, 25, and 50 g/L of xylitol. D-Xylose was preferentially utilized over xylitol and ethanol yields (Y _Etoh/S 0.26 g/g) were unaffected by xylitol. Added xylitol did inhibit conversion of xylose to xylitol at an external xylitol concentration of 50 g/L; Y _Xylitol/S was reduced from 0.21 to 0.14. Cell viability declined in all of the fermentations, but was not due to the presence of xylitol. The decline in viability was attributed to oxygen deprivation, since ethanol levels only reached 10.5 g/L and the decline cell viability was the same in each fermentation, regardless of the xylitol concentration.     

The fermentation of hexose and pentose sugars by Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis

Summary The fermentation by Candida shehatae and Pichia stipitis of xylitol and the various sugars which are liberated upon hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass was investigated. Both yeasts produced ethanol from d-glucose, d-mannose, d-galactose and d-xylose. Only P. stipitis fermented d-cellobiose, producing 6.5 g·l^-1 ethanol from 20 g·l^-1 cellobiose within 48 h. No ethanol was produced from l-arabinose, l-rhamnose or xylitol. Diauxie was evident during the fermentation of a sugar mixture. Following the depletion of glucose, P. stipitis fermented galactose, mannose, xylose and cellobiose simultaneously with no noticeable preceding lag period. A similar fermentation pattern was observed with C. shehatae, except that it failed to utilize cellobiose even though it grew on cellobiose when supplied as the sole sugar. P. stipitis produced considerably more ethanol from the sugar mixture than C. shehatae, primarily due to its ability to ferment cellobiose. In general P. stipitis exhibited a higher volumetric rate and yield of ethanol production. This yeast fermented glucose 30–50% more rapidly than xylose, whereas the rates of ethanol production from these two sugars by C. shehatae were similar. P. stipitis had no absolute vitamin requirement for xylose fermentation, but biotin and thiamine enhanced the rate and yield of ethanol production significantly.Nomenclature _max Maximum specific growth rate, h^-1 - Q _p Maximum volumetric rate of ethanol production, calculated from the slope of the ethanol vs. time curve, g·(l·h)^-1 - q _p Maximum specific rate of ethanol production, g·(g cells·h) - Y _p/s Ethanol yield coefficient, g ethanol·(g substrate utilized)^-1 - Y _x/s Cell yield coefficient, g biomass·(g substrate utilized)^-1 - E Efficiency of substrate utilization, g substrate consumed·(g initial substrate)^-1·100     

Lactic acid production by batch fermentation of whey permeate: A mathematical model

Summary The batch fermentation of whey permeate to lactic acid was improved by supplementing the broth with enzyme-hydrolyzed whey protein. A mathematical model based on laboratory results predicts to a 99% confidence limit the kinetics of this fermentation. Cell growth, acid production and protein and sugar use rates are defined in quantifiable terms related to the state of cell metabolism. The model shows that the constants of the Leudeking-Piret model are not true constants, but must vary with the medium composition, and especially the peptide average molecular weight. The kinetic mechanism on which the model is based also is presented.Nomenclature K _i lactic acid inhibition constant (g/l) - K _pr protein saturation constant during cell growth (g/l) - K _pr protein saturation constant during maintenance (g/l) - K _s lactose saturation constant (g/l) - [LA] lactic acid concentration (g/l) - [PR] protein concentration (g/l) - [S] lactose concentration (g/l) - t time (h) - [X] cell mass concentration (g/l) - , fermentation constants of Leudeking and Piret - specific growth rate (l/h) - Y _{g, LA/S} acid yield during cell growth (g acid/g sugar) - Y _{m, LA/S} acid yield during maintenance (g acid/g sugar) - Y _x/pr yield (g cells/g protein) - specific sugar use rate during cell growth (g sugar/h·g cell) - specific sugar use rate during maintenance (g sugar/h·cell)     

Batch fermentation kinetics of ethanol production by Zymomonas mobilis on cellulose hydrolysate

Summary Growth and ethanol production by three strains (MSN77, thermotolerant, SBE15, osmotolerant and wild type ZM4) of the bacterium Zymomonas mobilis were tested in a rich medium containing the hexose fraction from a cellulose hydrolysate (Aspen wood). The variations of yield and kinetic parameters with fermentation time revealed an inhibition of growth by the ethanol produced. This inhibition may result from the increase in medium osmolality due to ethanol formation from glucose.Nomenclature S glucose concentration (g/L) - C conversion of glucose (%) - t fermentation time (h) - q_S specific glucose uptake rate (g/g.h) - q_p specific ethanol productivity (g/g.h) - Q_p volumetric ethanol productivity (g/L.h) - Q_X volumetric biomass productivity (g/L.h) - Y_X/S biomass yield (g/g) - Y_p/S ethanol yield (g/g) - specific growth rate (h^-1)     

Role of Glycerol Addition on Xylose-to-Xylitol Bioconversion by Candida guilliermondii

The effect of glycerol on xylose-to-xylitol bioconversion by Candida guilliermondii was evaluated by its addition (0.7 and 6.5 g/l) to semidefined media (xylose as a substrate). The glycerol concentrations were chosen based on the amounts produced during previous studies on xylitol production by C. guilliermondii. Medium without glycerol addition (control) and medium containing glycerol (53 g/l) in substitution to xylose were also evaluated. According to the results, the addition of 0.7 g/l glycerol to the fermentation medium favored not only the yield (Y _P/S = 0.78 g/g) but also the xylitol productivity (Q _P = 1.13 g/l/h). During the xylose-to-xylitol bioconversion, the formation of byproducts (glycerol and ethanol) was observed for all conditions employed. In relation to the cellular growth, glycerol as the only carbon source for C. guilliermondii was better than xylose or xylose and glycerol mixtures, resulting in a maximum cellular concentration (5.34 g/l).     

Continuous multistep versus fed‐batch production of ethanol and xylitol in a simulated medium of sugarcane bagasse hydrolyzates

Co‐cultures for simultaneous production of ethanol and xylitol were studied under different operation bioreactor modes using Candida tropicalis IEC5‐ITV and Saccharomyces cerevisiae ITV01‐RD in a simulated medium of sugarcane bagasse hydrolyzates. Xylitol and ethanol tolerance by S. cerevisiae and C. tropicalis, respectively, was evaluated. The results showed that C. tropicalis was sensitive to ethanol concentrations up to 30 g/L, while xylitol had no effect on S. cerevisiae viability and metabolism. The best condition found for simultaneous culture was S. cerevisiae co‐culture and C. tropicalis sequential cultivation at 24 h. Under these conditions, productivity and yield for ethanol were Q_EtOH = 0.72 g L^?1 h^?1 and Y_EtOH/s = 0.37 g/g, and for xylitol, Q_XylOH = 0.10 g L^?1 h^?1 and Y_XylOH/S = 0.31 g/g, respectively; using fed‐batch culture, the results were Q_EtOH = 0.87 g L^?1 h^?1 and Y_EtOH/s = 0.44 g L^?1 h^?1, and Q_EtOH = 0.27 g L^?1 h^?1 and Y_EtOH/s = 0.57 g/g, respectively. Maximum volumetric productivity in continuous multistep cultures of ethanol and xylitol was at dilution rates of 0.131 and 0.074 h^?1, respectively. Continuous multistep production, Q_EtOH increased up to 50% more than in fed‐batch culture, even though xylitol yield remained unchanged.     

Lactose continuous fermentation with cells recycled by ultrafiltration and lactate separation by electrodialysis: model identification

Summary An off-line parameter estimation method has been developed to predict the dynamic behaviour of a continuous lactose fermentation system. The model used is an unstructured model taking into account cell growth, substrate consumption, and metabolite production (lactic acid). This method, based on the Hooke-Jeeves non-linear-programming technique, results in a good estimation of the biological parameters of the model, and so gives a better understanding of the different phenomena involved in lactose fermentation.Nomenclature Cp, Cs, Cz, Dp, Ds, Dz coefficients in system (A) - Fe bioreactor influent flow rate (1/h) - I current in the ED unit (A) - J lactate flux in the ED unit (g/h) - Kd mortality constant (h^-1) - Kp product inhibition constant (g/l) - Ks strbstrate saturation constant (g/l) - P ₀ product concentration in the bioreactor (g/l) - P ₁ product concentration in the D tank (g/l) - P _0r estimation of P ₀ (g/l) - Q ₀ retentate flow rate (UF influent) (1/h) - Q ₁ permeate flow rate (1/h) - Q ₂₂ cell bleed flow rate (1/h) - Q ₃ recycling flow rate in the ED (influent) (1/h) - Se substrate concentration in the influent (g/l) - S ₀ supstrate concentration in the bioreactor (g/l) - S ₁ substrate concentration in tank D (g/l) - S _0r estimation of S ₀ (g/l) - t time (h) - V ₀ fermentation broth volume (1) - V ₁ tank D volume (1) - X ₀ biomass concentration in the bioreactor (g/l) - Y _P/S (=1/Y _S/P) lactic acid yield coefficient (g lactic acid/g lactose consumed) - Y _X/S (=1/Y _S/X) cell yield coefficient (g cells produced/g lactose consumed) - Y _X/Z (=1/Y _Z/X) second cell yield coefficient (g cells produced/g nitrogen consumed) - Y _x, Y _m input mathematical parameters of the linear system (M ₂) - Ze nitrogen concentration in the influent (g/l) - Z ₀ nitrogen concentration in the bioreactor (g/l) - Z ₁ nitrogen concentration in tank D (g/l) - Z _0r estimation of Z ₀ (g/l) - , constants of the Luedeking and Piret's model - specific growth rate (h^-1) - _max maximum specific growth rate (h^-1)     

Xylitol production by a Pichia stipitis D-xylulokinase mutant

Xylitol production by Pichia stipitis FPL-YS30, a xyl3-1 mutant that metabolizes xylose using an alternative metabolic pathway, was investigated under aerobic and oxygen-limited culture conditions. Under both culture conditions, FPL-YS30 (xyl3-1) produced a negligible amount of ethanol and converted xylose mainly into xylitol with comparable yields (0.30 and 0.27 g xylitol/g xylose). However, xylose consumption increased five-fold under aerobic compared to oxygen-limited conditions. This suggests that the efficiency of the alternative route of xylose assimilation is affected by respiration. As a result, the FPL-YS30 strain produced 26 g/l of xylitol, and exhibited a higher volumetric productivity (0.22 g xylitol l^–1 h^–1) under aerobic conditions.     

Evaluation of biocomposite-based supports for immobilized-cell xylitol production compared with a free-cell system

This study was conducted to evaluate the importance of aeration in free and immobilized cell systems in an aerated bioreactor for xylitol production from an oat hull hemicellulosic hydrolysate using an integrated process. The aeration rate (AR) or oxygen mass transfer coefficient (k_La) demonstrated a significant role in controlling cell (Candida guilliermondii FTI 20037) regeneration and bioconversion performance in free and immobilized cell systems. In the free cell system, an aeration rate of 1.25 vvm corresponding to k_La of 15.8 1/h resulted in maximum values of product yield (Y_p/s: 0.87 g/g), productivity (Q_p: 0.57 g/l/h), and final xylitol concentration (P_f: 55 g/l) from the hydrolysate with a 74.5 g/l xylose concentration. However, in the aerated immobilized cell system, maximum and almost similar results (almost P_f: 54 g/l, Q_p: 0.57 g/l/h and Y_p/s: 0.84 g/g) were obtained with aeration rates from 1.25 to 1.5 vvm using composites based on polypropylene (PP) and partially delignified fiber (PDF). Composites based on acid treated fiber (ATF) containing a high amount of lignin showed some inhibitory impact on xylose uptake and xylitol formation (P_f: 47 g/l and Q_p < 0.49 g/l/h) with the optimal aeration rate of 1.5 vvm in the initial cycle of the bioconversion; this inhibition impact could be resolved in the next consecutive cycles. The surface modifier polyethyleneimine (PEI) slightly enhanced cell retention in the immobilized form on the ATF-based cell support. This investigation helps fill in the knowledge gaps existing on the integrated processing of the lignocellulosic biomass for xylitol bioproduction and biorefinery industry; however, more scale-up studies are recommended for commercialization.     

Cell recycling studies for α-amylase production by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens

Production of -amylase by a strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens was investigated in a cell recycle bioreactor incorporating a membrane filtration module for cell separation. Experimental fermentation studies with the B. amyloliquefaciens strain WA-4 clearly showed that incorporating cell recycling increased -amylase yield and volumetric productivity as compared to conventional continuous fermentation. The effect of operating conditions on -amylase production was difficult to demonstrate experimentally due to the problems of keeping the permeate and bleed rates constant over an extended period of time. Computer simulations were therefore undertaken to support the experimental data, as well as to elucidate the dynamics of -amylase production in the cell recycle bioreactor as compared to conventional chemostat and batch fermentations. Taken together, the simulations and experiments clearly showed that low bleed rate (high recycling ratio) various a high level of -amylase activity. The simulated fermentations revealed that this was especially pronounced at high recycling ratios. Volumetric productivity was maximum at a dilution rate of around 0.4 h^–1 and a high recycling ratio. The latter had to exceed 0.75 before volumetric productivity was significantly greater than with conventional chemostat fermentation.List of Symbols a proportionality constant relating the specific growth rate to the logarithm of G (h) - a ₁ reaction order with respect to starch concentration - a ₂ reaction order with respect to glucose concentration - B bleed rate (h^–1) - C starch concentration (g/l) - C ₀ starch concentration in the feed (g/l) - D dilution rate (h^–1) - D _E volumetric productivity (KNU/(mlh)) - e intracellular -amylase concentration (g/g cell mass) - E extracellular -amylase concentration (KNU/ml) - F volumetric flow rate (l/h) - G average number of genome equivalents of DNA per cell - k _l intracellular equilibrium constant - k ₂ intracellular equilibrium constant - k _s Monod saturation constant (g/l) - k ₃ excretion rate constant (h^–1) - k _d first order decay constant (h^–1) - k _gl rate constant for glucose production - k _st rate constant for starch hydrolysis - k _t1 proportionality constant for -amylase production (gmRNA/g substrate) - k ₁ translation constant (g/(g mRNAh)) - KNU kilo Novo unit - m maintenance coefficient (g substrate/(g cell massh)) - n number of binding sites for the co-repressor on the cytoplasmic repressor - Q repression function K₁/K₂Q1.0 - R ratio of recycling - R _s rate of glucose production (g/lh) - r _c rate of starch hydrolysis (g/(lh)) - R _eX retention by the filter of the compounds X: starch or -amylase - r intracellular -amylase mRNA concentration (g/g cell mass) - r _C volumetric productivity of starch (g/lh) - r _E volumetric productivity of intracellular -amylase (KNU/(g cell massh)) - r _r volumetric productivity of intracellular mRNA (g/(g cell massh)) - r _e volumetric productivity of extracellular -amylase (KNU/(mlh)) - r _s volumetric productivity of glucose (g/(lh)) - r _X volumetric productivity of cell mass (g/(lh)) - S ₀ free reducing sugar concentration in the feed (g/l) - S extracellular concentration of reducing sugar (g/1) - t time (h) - V volume (l) - X cell mass concentration (g/l) - Y yield coefficient (g cell mass/g substrate) - Y _E/S yield coefficient (KNU -amylase/g substrate) - Y _E total amount of -amylase produced (KNU) - substrate uptake (g substrate/(g cell massh)) - specific growth rate of cell mass (h^–1) - _d specific death rate of cells (h^–1) - _m maximum specific growth rate of cell mass (h^–1) This study was supported by Bioprocess Engineering Programme of the Nordic Industrial Foundation and the Center for Process Biotechnology, the Technical University of Denmark.     

Increase of xylitol yield by feeding xylose and glucose in Candida tropicalis

Candida tropicalis, a strain isolated from the sludge of a factory manufacturing xylose, produced a high xylitol concentration of 131 g/l from 150 g/l xylose at 45 h in a flask. Above 150 g/l xylose, however, volumetric xylitol production rates decreased because of a lag period in cell growth. In fed-batch culture, the volumetric production rate and xylitol yield from xylose varied substantially with the controlled xylose concentration and were maximum at a controlled xylose concentration of 60 g/l. To increase the xylitol yield from xylose, feeding experiments using different ratios of xylose and glucose were carried out in a fermentor. The maximum xylitol yield from 300 g/l xylose was 91% at a glucose/xylose feeding ratio of 15%, while the maximum volumetric production rate of xylitol was 3.98 g l⁻¹ h⁻¹ at a glucose/xylose feeding ratio of 20%. Xylitol production was found to decrease markedly as its concentration rose above 250 g/l. In order to accumulate xylitol to 250 g/l, 270 g/l xylose was added in total, at a glucose/xylose feeding ratio of 15%. Under these conditions, a final xylitol production of 251 g/l, which corresponded to a yield of 93%, was obtained from 270 g/l xylose in 55 h. Received: 20 April 1998 / Received revision: 29 May 1998 / Accepted: 19 June 1998     

A kinetic model and simulation of starch saccharification and simultaneous ethanol fermentation by amyloglucosidase and Zymomonas mobilis

A mathematical model is described for the simultaneous saccharification and ethanol fermentation (SSF) of sago starch using amyloglucosidase (AMG) and Zymomonas mobilis. By introducing the degree of polymerization (DP) of oligosaccharides produced from sago starch treated with -amylase, a series of Michaelis-Menten equations were obtained. After determining kinetic parameters from the results of simple experiments carried out at various substrate and enzyme concentrations and from the subsite mapping theory, this model was adapted to simulate the SSF process. The results of simulation for SSF are in good agreement with experimental results.List of Symbols g/g rate coefficient of production - _max 1/h maximum specific growth rate - E %, v/w AMG concentration - G ₁ mmol/l glucose concentration - G _c mmol/l glucose concentration consumed - G _f mmol/l glucose concentration formed - G _n mmol/l n-mer maltooligosaccharide concentration - K _i g/l ethanol inhibition constant for ethanol production - K _g mmol/l glucose inhibition constant for glucose production - K _p mmol/l glucose limitation constant for ethanol production - K _x mmol/l glucose limitation constant for cell growth - K _m,n mmol/l Michaelis-Menten constant for n-mer oligosaccharide - k _e %, v/w enzyme limitation constant - k _es proportional constant - k _{max, n} 1/s maximal velocity for n-mer digestion - k _s g/l substrate limitation constant - m _s g/g maintenance energy - MW _n g/mol molecular weight of n-mer oligosaccharide - P g/l ethanol concentration - P ₀ g/l initial ethanol concentration - P _m g/l maximal ethanol concentration - Q _pm g/(g · h) maximum specific ethanol production rate - S _n mmol/h branched n-mer oligosaccharide concentration - S ₀ g/l initial starch concentration - S _sta g/l starch concentration - S _tot g/l total sugar concentration - V _{max, n} 1/h maximum digestion rate of n-mer oligosaccharide - V ₀ g/(l · h) initial glucose formation rate - X g/l cell mass - X ₀ g/l initial cell mass - Y _p/s g/g ethanol yield - Y _x/s g/g cell mass yield     

The oxygen requirements of yeasts for the fermentation of d-xylose and d-glucose to ethanol

Summary The effect of oxygen availability on d-xylose and D-glucose metabolism by Pichia stipitis, Candida shehatae and Pachysolen tannophilus was investigated. Oxygen was not required for fermentation of d-xylose or d-glucose, but stimulated the ethanol production rate from both sugars. Under oxygen-limited conditions, the highest ethanol yield coefficient (Y_e/s) of 0.47 was obtained on d-xylose with. P. stipitis, while under similar conditions C. shehatae fermented d-xylose most rapidly with a specific productivity (q_pmax) of 0.32 h^-1. Both of these yeasts fermented d-xylose better and produced less xylitol than. P. tannophilus. Synthesis of polyols such as xylitol, arabitol, glycerol and ribitol reduced the ethanol yield in some instances and was related to the yeast strain, carbon source and oxygen availability. In general, these yeasts fermented d-glucose more rapidly than d-xylose. By contrast Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermented d-glucose at least three-fold faster under similar conditions.Nomenclature q_pmax maximum specific rate of ethanol production (g ethanol per g dry biomass per hour) - Y_e/s ethanol yield (g ethanol per g substrate utilized) - Y_p/s polyol yield (g polyol per g substrate utilized) - Y_x/s biomass yield (g dry biomass per g substrate utilized) - _max maximum specific growth rate (per hour)