Reduced gene dosage of histone H4 prevents CENP-A mislocalization and chromosomal instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mislocalization of the centromeric histone H3 variant (Cse4 in budding yeast, CID in flies, CENP-A in humans) to noncentromeric regions contributes to chromosomal instability (CIN) in yeast, fly, and human cells. Overexpression and mislocalization of CENP-A have been observed in cancers, however, the mechanisms that facilitate the mislocalization of overexpressed CENP-A have not been fully explored. Defects in proteolysis of overexpressed Cse4 (GALCSE4) lead to its mislocalization and synthetic dosage lethality (SDL) in mutants for E3 ubiquitin ligases (Psh1, Slx5, SCF^Met30, and SCF^Cdc4), Doa1, Hir2, and Cdc7. In contrast, defects in sumoylation of overexpressed cse4K215/216/A/R prevent its mislocalization and do not cause SDL in a psh1Δ strain. Here, we used a genome-wide screen to identify factors that facilitate the mislocalization of overexpressed Cse4 by characterizing suppressors of the psh1Δ GALCSE4 SDL. Deletions of histone H4 alleles (HHF1 or HHF2), which were among the most prominent suppressors, also suppress slx5Δ, cdc4-1, doa1Δ, hir2Δ, and cdc7-4 GALCSE4 SDL. Reduced dosage of H4 leads to defects in sumoylation and reduced mislocalization of overexpressed Cse4, which contributes to suppression of CIN when Cse4 is overexpressed. We determined that the hhf1-20, cse4-102, and cse4-111 mutants, which are defective in the Cse4-H4 interaction, also exhibit reduced sumoylation of Cse4 and do not display psh1Δ GALCSE4 SDL. In summary, we have identified genes that contribute to the mislocalization of overexpressed Cse4 and defined a role for the gene dosage of H4 in facilitating Cse4 sumoylation and mislocalization to noncentromeric regions, leading to CIN when Cse4 is overexpressed.     

SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase (STUbL) Slx5 regulates proteolysis of centromeric histone H3 variant Cse4 and prevents its mislocalization to euchromatin

Centromeric histone H3, CENP-A^Cse4, is essential for faithful chromosome segregation. Stringent regulation of cellular levels of CENP-A^Cse4 restricts its localization to centromeres. Mislocalization of CENP-A^Cse4 is associated with aneuploidy in yeast and flies and tumorigenesis in human cells; thus defining pathways that regulate CENP-A levels is critical for understanding how mislocalization of CENP-A contributes to aneuploidy in human cancers. Previous work in budding yeast shows that ubiquitination of overexpressed Cse4 by Psh1, an E3 ligase, partially contributes to proteolysis of Cse4. Here we provide the first evidence that Cse4 is sumoylated by E3 ligases Siz1 and Siz2 in vivo and in vitro. Ubiquitination of Cse4 by the small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO)-targeted ubiquitin ligase (STUbL) Slx5 plays a critical role in proteolysis of Cse4 and prevents mislocalization of Cse4 to euchromatin under normal physiological conditions. Accumulation of sumoylated Cse4 species and increased stability of Cse4 in slx5∆ strains suggest that sumoylation precedes ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of Cse4. Slx5-mediated Cse4 proteolysis is independent of Psh1, since slx5∆ psh1∆ strains exhibit higher levels of Cse4 stability and mislocalization than either slx5∆ or psh1∆ strains. Our results demonstrate a role for Slx5 in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of Cse4 to prevent its mislocalization and maintain genome stability.     

Cdc7-mediated phosphorylation of Cse4 regulates high-fidelity chromosome segregation in budding yeast

Faithful chromosome segregation maintains chromosomal stability as errors in this process contribute to chromosomal instability (CIN), which has been observed in many diseases including cancer. Epigenetic regulation of kinetochore proteins such as Cse4 (CENP-A in humans) plays a critical role in high-fidelity chromosome segregation. Here we show that Cse4 is a substrate of evolutionarily conserved Cdc7 kinase, and that Cdc7-mediated phosphorylation of Cse4 prevents CIN. We determined that Cdc7 phosphorylates Cse4 in vitro and interacts with Cse4 in vivo in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Cdc7 is required for kinetochore integrity as reduced levels of CEN-associated Cse4, a faster exchange of Cse4 at the metaphase kinetochores, and defects in chromosome segregation, are observed in a cdc7-7 strain. Phosphorylation of Cse4 by Cdc7 is important for cell survival as constitutive association of a kinase-dead variant of Cdc7 (cdc7-kd) with Cse4 at the kinetochore leads to growth defects. Moreover, phospho-deficient mutations of Cse4 for consensus Cdc7 target sites contribute to CIN phenotype. In summary, our results have defined a role for Cdc7-mediated phosphorylation of Cse4 in faithful chromosome segregation.     

Concerted Action of the Ubiquitin-Fusion Degradation Protein 1 (Ufd1) and Sumo-Targeted Ubiquitin Ligases (STUbLs) in the DNA-Damage Response

In eukaryotes many players in the DNA-damage response (DDR) catalyze protein sumoylation or ubiquitylation. Emphasis has been placed on how these modifications orchestrate the sequential recruitment of repair factors to sites of DNA damage or stalled replication forks. Here, we shed light on a pathway in which sumoylated factors are eliminated through the coupled action of Sumo-targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs) and the ubiquitin-fusion degradation protein 1 (Ufd1). Ufd1 is a subunit of the Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4 complex implicated in the sorting of ubiquitylated substrates for degradation by the proteasome. We find that in fission yeast, Ufd1 interacts physically and functionally with the Sumo-targeted ubiquitin ligase (STUbL) Rfp1, homologous to human RNF4, and with the Sumo E3 ligase Pli1, homologous to human PIAS1. Deleting a C-terminal domain of Ufd1 that mediates the interaction of Ufd1 with Rfp1, Pli1, and Sumo (ufd1ΔCt ^213-342) lead to an accumulation of high-molecular-weight Sumo conjugates and caused severe genomic instabilities. The spectrum of sensitivity of ufd1ΔCt ^213-342 cells to genotoxins, the epistatic relationships of ufd1ΔCt ^213-342 with mutations in DNA repair factors, and the localization of the repair factor Rad22 in ufd1ΔCt ^213-342 cells point to ufd1ΔCt ^213-342 cells accumulating aberrant structures during replication that require homologous recombination (HR) for their repair. We present evidence that HR is however often not successful in ufd1ΔCt ^213-342 cells and we identify Rad22 as one of the high-molecular-weight conjugates accumulating in the ufd1ΔCt ^213-342 mutant consistent with Rad22 being a STUbL/Ufd1 substrate. Suggesting a direct role of Ufd1 in the processing of Sumo-conjugates, Ufd1 formed nuclear foci colocalizing with Sumo during the DDR, and Sumo-conjugates accumulated in foci in the ufd1ΔCt ^213-342 mutant. Broader functional relationships between Ufd1 and STUbLs conceivably affect numerous cellular processes beyond the DDR.     

R-loops at centromeric chromatin contribute to defects in kinetochore integrity and chromosomal instability in budding yeast

R-loops, the byproduct of DNA–RNA hybridization and the displaced single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), have been identified in bacteria, yeasts, and other eukaryotic organisms. The persistent presence of R-loops contributes to defects in DNA replication and repair, gene expression, and genomic integrity. R-loops have not been detected at centromeric (CEN) chromatin in wild-type budding yeast. Here we used an hpr1∆ strain that accumulates R-loops to investigate the consequences of R-loops at CEN chromatin and chromosome segregation. We show that Hpr1 interacts with the CEN-histone H3 variant, Cse4, and prevents the accumulation of R-loops at CEN chromatin for chromosomal stability. DNA–RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP) analysis showed an accumulation of R-loops at CEN chromatin that was reduced by overexpression of RNH1 in hpr1∆ strains. Increased levels of ssDNA, reduced levels of Cse4 and its assembly factor Scm3, and mislocalization of histone H3 at CEN chromatin were observed in hpr1∆ strains. We determined that accumulation of R-loops at CEN chromatin contributes to defects in kinetochore biorientation and chromosomal instability (CIN) and these phenotypes are suppressed by RNH1 overexpression in hpr1∆ strains. In summary, our studies provide mechanistic insights into how accumulation of R-loops at CEN contributes to defects in kinetochore integrity and CIN.     

Cellular functions of Ufd2 and Ufd3 in proteasomal protein degradation depend on Cdc48 binding

The chaperone-related AAA ATPase Cdc48 (p97/VCP in higher eukaryotes) segregates ubiquitylated proteins for subsequent degradation by the 26S proteasome or for nonproteolytic fates. The specific outcome of Cdc48 activity is controlled by the evolutionary conserved cofactors Ufd2 and Ufd3, which antagonistically regulate the substrates' ubiquitylation states. In contrast to the interaction of Ufd3 and Cdc48, the interaction between the ubiquitin chain elongating enzyme Ufd2 and Cdc48 has not been precisely mapped. Consequently, it is still unknown whether physiological functions of Ufd2 in fact require Cdc48 binding. Here, we show that Ufd2 binds to the C-terminal tail of Cdc48, unlike the human Ufd2 homologue E4B, which interacts with the N domain of p97. The binding sites for Ufd2 and Ufd3 on Cdc48 overlap and depend critically on the conserved residue Y834 but are not identical. Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc48 mutants altered in residue Y834 or lacking the C-terminal tail are viable and exhibit normal growth. Importantly, however, loss of Ufd2 and Ufd3 binding in these mutants phenocopies defects of Δufd2 and Δufd3 mutants in the ubiquitin fusion degradation (UFD) and Ole1 fatty acid desaturase activation (OLE) pathways. These results indicate that key cellular functions of Ufd2 and Ufd3 in proteasomal protein degradation require their interaction with Cdc48.     

Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4: stuck in the middle with Ub

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway has a well-defined beginning and end. Target proteins are initially recognized by upstream components and tagged with polyubiquitin chains. The 26S proteasome then degrades these polyubiquitinated proteins. Until recently, it was not known what, if any, steps occurred between the initial polyubiquitination of target proteins and their final degradation. Several new papers investigating the function of the Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4 complex indicate that there is indeed a middle to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. The Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4 complex functions in the recognition of several polyubiquitin-tagged proteins and facilitates their presentation to the 26S proteasome for processive degradation or even more specific processing. The elucidation of Cdc48, Ufd1 and Npl4 action not only provides long-sought functions for these specific proteins, but illuminates a poorly understood part of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.     

Roles for the VCP co-factors Npl4 and Ufd1 in neuronal function in Drosophila melanogaster

The VCP-Ufd1-Npl4 complex regulates proteasomal processing within cells by delivering ubiquitinated proteins to the proteasome for degradation. Mutations in VCP are associated with two neurodegenerative diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and inclusion body myopathy with Paget's disease of the bone and frontotemporal dementia (IBMPFD), and extensive study has revealed crucial functions of VCP within neurons. By contrast, little is known about the functions of Npl4 or Ufd1 in vivo. Using neuronal-specific knockdown of Npl4 or Ufd1 in Drosophila melanogaster, we infer that Npl4 contributes to microtubule organization within developing motor neurons. Moreover, Npl4 RNAi flies present with neurodegenerative phenotypes including progressive locomotor deficits, reduced lifespan and increased accumulation of TAR DNA-binding protein-43 homolog (TBPH). Knockdown, but not overexpression, of TBPH also exacerbates Npl4 RNAi-associated adult-onset neurodegenerative phenotypes. In contrast, we find that neuronal knockdown of Ufd1 has little effect on neuromuscular junction (NMJ) organization, TBPH accumulation or adult behaviour. These findings suggest the differing neuronal functions of Npl4 and Ufd1 in vivo.     

Cdc48p(Npl4p/Ufd1p) binds and segregates membrane-anchored/tethered complexes via a polyubiquitin signal present on the anchors

Cdc48p is an abundant and conserved member of the AAA ATPase family of molecular chaperones. Cdc48p performs ubiquitin-selective functions, which are mediated by numerous ubiquitin binding adaptors, including the Npl4p-Ufd1p complex. Previous studies suggest that Cdc48p-containing complexes carry out many biochemical activities, including ubiquitination, deubiquitination, protein complex segregation, and targeting of ubiquitinated substrates to the proteasome. The molecular mechanisms by which Cdc48p-containing complexes participate in these processes remain poorly defined. We show here by using physiologically relevant Cdc48p substrates (i.e., endoplasmic membrane-associated/tethered dimers of Mga2p and Spt23p) and in vitro systems with purified proteins that Cdc48p(Npl4p/Ufd1p) binds to and promotes segregation of the tethered proteins via a polyubiquitin signal present on the membrane-bound proteins. Mobilization does not involve retrotranslocation of the associated anchors. These results provide biochemical evidence that Cdc48p(Npl4p/Ufd1p) functions as a polyubiquitin-selective segregase and that a polyubiquitin-Cdc48p pathway modulates protein interactions at cell membranes.     

Lipid droplets go nuclear

Dislocation of polypeptides from the mitochondrial outer membrane by the p97/Cdc48–Ufd1–Npl4 adenosine triphosphatase complex is essential for mitochondria-associated degradation and Parkin-mediated mitophagy. In this issue, Wu et al. (2016. J. Cell Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201510098) identify Doa1 as a pivotal adaptor that recruits substrates to Cdc48 for processing.Eukaryotic cells use the ubiquitin proteasome system to eliminate misfolded proteins from diverse subcellular compartments to maintain protein homeostasis. Once polyubiquitinated, soluble proteins are readily targeted to the proteasome. However, the degradation of proteins in lipid bilayer or membrane-encircled organelles requires additional steps because the membranes render these substrates, at least in part, inaccessible to the ubiquitin proteasome system. Taking ER-associated degradation (ERAD) as an example, misfolded ER luminal proteins can only become ubiquitinated after they emerge from the ER lumen via a retrotranslocation process; the degradation of ubiquitinated substrates embedded in the membrane then requires their dislocation into the cytosol, a reaction mediated by a conserved ATPase named p97 in mammals or Cdc48 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Christianson and Ye, 2014). During this process, the hexameric barrel-like ATPase p97/Cdc48, assisted by an array of cofactors, uses the energy from ATP hydrolysis to extract polypeptides from the membranes for targeting to the proteasome. Besides ERAD, p97/Cdc48 is also involved in dislocating polypeptides from the mitochondrial outer membranes (MOMs) to facilitate mitochondria-associated degradation (MAD; Heo et al., 2010; Xu et al., 2011; Hemion et al., 2014). The MAD process can be used to eliminate aberrant proteins for regulation of mitochondria protein homeostasis or to degrade factors (e.g., mitofusin) controlling the turnover of damaged mitochondria by mitophagy (Tanaka et al., 2010). Intriguingly, p97 and the heterodimeric cofactor Ufd1-Npl4 accumulate on the surface of damaged mitochondria, and deficiency in each of these factors causes a defect in Parkin-mediated mitophagy (Kimura et al., 2013). These findings suggest a critical role of p97/Cdc48 in mitochondria homeostasis regulation, but how substrates are recruited to p97/Cdc48 in MAD is unclear. In this issue, Wu et al. identify Doa1 as a critical regulator of Cdc48-dependent MAD in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Wu et al., 2016).The MAD pathway has been poorly characterized in budding yeast because of a lack of model substrates, so Wu et al. (2016) first measured the half-life of endogenously tagged MOM proteins to identify substrates suitable for mechanistic characterization of this process. The study revealed four short-lived proteins (Fzo1, Mdm34, Msp1, and Tom70) whose rapid turnover depends not only on the proteasome but also on Cdc48. Among these substrates, Tom70, a mitochondrial import receptor, was used to set up a transposon-based genetic screen. The screen, notwithstanding its limited genome coverage (∼15%), efficiently uncovered four insertion mutants with elevated Tom70 expression that were likely associated with defects in MAD because the affected genes encode a proteasome-associated deubiquitinase (Ubp6), a deubiquitinase-binding protein (Bro1), an E3 ubiquitin ligase (Rsp5), and the Cdc48 adaptor Doa1. Because Doa1 was the only factor required for efficient degradation of all four MAD substrates, the authors further characterized its function.DOA1 (also named UFD3) was initially reported in a genetic screen that searched for genes required for efficient degradation of a β-galactosidase fusion protein containing a ubiquitin moiety at the N terminus. The screen identified five mutants, namely, ufd1–5 (ubiquitin fusion degradation; Johnson et al., 1995). Subsequent studies established several of these UFD proteins as key Cdc48-binding proteins required for Cdc48-dependent degradation. These include a substrate-recruiting adaptor (Ufd1) and a substrate-processing cofactor (Ufd2; Koegl et al., 1999; Meyer et al., 2000; Böhm et al., 2011). The WD domain–containing Doa1 was also shown to bind Cdc48, but it competes with Ufd2 in binding to the C terminus of Cdc48, and therefore was proposed to antagonize Ufd2 functionally in Cdc48-mediated degradation (Rumpf and Jentsch, 2006). However, because DOA1 deficiency also causes a reduction in the level of endogenous ubiquitin, which could indirectly stabilize proteasome substrates (Johnson et al., 1995), whether Doa1 negatively regulates Cdc48-mediated degradation has been unclear. Strikingly, Wu et al. (2016) showed that in the case of MAD, reexpression of ubiquitin in DOA1 null cells did not restore degradation. Thus, Wu et al. (2016) for the first time reveal a role of Doa1 in Cdc48-dependent degradation that is unrelated to its function in ubiquitin homeostasis regulation. Doa1 contains an N-terminal WD domain that has a strong ubiquitin-binding activity (Pashkova et al., 2010), a weak ubiquitin-binding PFU domain (Fu et al., 2009), and a C-terminal Cdc48-binding PUL domain (Ghislain et al., 1996; Mullally et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2009; Qiu et al., 2010). Wu et al. (2016) performed complementation experiments with a series of Doa1 truncation mutants and showed that the WD domain and the PUL domain of Doa1 are indispensable for MAD, whereas the PFU domain is only required for degradation of a subset of MAD substrates.In ERAD, Cdc48/p97 is known to interact with ubiquitinated substrates and extract them from the ER membranes (Ye et al., 2001). Cdc48–Doa1 may act similarly in MAD because an interaction between Cdc48 and MAD substrates was observed by coimmunoprecipitation and because deletion of DOA1 caused MAD substrates to accumulate on mitochondrial membranes. Furthermore, biochemical fractionation showed that in cells bearing a temperature-sensitive cdc48 allele or lacking DOA1, MAD substrates enriched in the mitochondrial fraction are highly ubiquitinated.Comprehensive analyses of other known Cdc48 cofactors showed that in addition to Doa1, the Ufd1–Npl4 complex is also required for degradation of Cdc48 substrates at the mitochondria. As Ufd1–Npl4 binds to Cdc48 via its N-terminal domain, whereas Doa1 interacts with the C-terminal tail of Cdc48, a multiprotein complex consisting of Cdc48, Ufd1, Npl4, and Doa1 could be detected by coimmunoprecipitation. Genetic studies showed that both Doa1 and Npl4 are required for substrate interaction with Cdc48 in MAD, suggesting that these factors may function as a substrate-recruiting cofactor. Interestingly, the interaction of Doa1 with ubiquitinated MAD substrates, while being mediated by its WD40 domain, is also dependent on Cdc48: in cdc48-3 mutant cells, Doa1 accumulates on the mitochondrial membranes and binds MAD substrates more efficiently, yet deletion of the Cdc48-interacting domain reduced the interaction of Doa1 with MAD substrates. These results suggest that Doa1 may facilitate substrate recruitment to Cdc48 only when it is bound to Cdc48; but upon Cdc48-mediated extraction, substrates are released from this complex (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Cdc48–Doa1–dependent degradation of MOM proteins. A MOM protein (red) is ubiquitinated by an E3 ubiquitin ligase. The ubiquitin chain is then recognized by the ubiquitin-binding WD domain of Doa1 (light green), which recruits the substrate to the Cdc48–Ufd1–Npl4 complex through an interaction between its PUL domain (gray) and the Cdc48 C terminus. Upon ATP hydrolysis, Cdc48–Ufd1–Npl4 extracts ubiquitinated substrate from the MOM and brings it to the proteasome for degradation.The function of Doa1 in targeting proteins for degradation by the proteasome appears specific to MAD as deletion of DOA1 either had no effect on degradation of nonmitochondrial substrates or, in the case of the ERAD substrate CPY*, the stabilizing effect of DOA1 deletion could be attributed to the deficiency in ubiquitin. Moreover, unlike Ufd2, DOA1 deficiency did not sensitize cells to ER stress triggered by deletion of the IRE1 component of the unfolded protein response. In contrast, the growth of cells under increased mitochondrial oxidative stress conditions, such as superoxide dismutase deficiency, was compromised by deletion of the DOA1 gene, and this phenotype could be rescued by wild-type Doa1, but not by Doa1 mutants lacking either the WD or the Cdc48-binding PUL domain.Overall, Wu et al. (2016) convincingly establish Doa1 as a key regulator of MAD in S. cerevisiae, but whether Doa1’s mammalian homologue phospholipase A2 activating protein is similarly involved in MAD as well as in Parkin-mediated mitophagy remains to be tested. Because Doa1 binds to Cdc48 at a site close to the hexameric ring formed by the second ATPase domain (D2; Mullally et al., 2006; Rumpf and Jentsch, 2006; Zhao et al., 2009; Qiu et al., 2010), these findings further suggest that Cdc48 and perhaps its mammalian homologue p97 might first engage substrate using the D2 domain, as proposed previously (DeLaBarre et al., 2006). Intriguingly, the N domain–binding cofactor Ufd1–Npl4 is also required for substrate interaction with Cdc48/p97 in MAD. It is unclear how substrate recruitment to Cdc48/p97 could simultaneously involve two spatially separated adaptors. One possibility is that Ufd1–Npl4 may indirectly promote substrate binding by allosterically activating Cdc48/p97 or Doa1. Alternatively, these adaptors may relay substrate for targeting to Cdc48. The key to distinguish between these models lies in better assays that would allow the mapping of direct interactions between Cdc48 and MAD substrates in the presence or absence of these adaptors. The precise signal for substrate recognition in Cdc48p–Doa1–mediated MAD also remains to be elucidated. Despite these unresolved issues, the newly identified substrates and the demonstration that Doa1 is the MAD adaptor for Cdc48 by Wu et al. (2016) should provide a new handle to advance our understanding of this important yet poorly studied pathway.     

A complex of mammalian ufd1 and npl4 links the AAA-ATPase, p97, to ubiquitin and nuclear transport pathways

The AAA-ATPase, p97/Cdc48p, has been implicated in many different pathways ranging from membrane fusion to ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. Binding of the p47 complex directs p97 to act in the post-mitotic fusion of Golgi membranes. We now describe another binding complex comprising mammalian Ufd1 and Npl4. Yeast Ufd1p is required for ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation whereas yeast Npl4p has been implicated in nuclear transport. In rat liver cytosol, Ufd1 and Npl4 form a binary complex, which exists either alone or bound to p97. Ufd1/Npl4 competes with p47 for binding to p97 and so inhibits Golgi membrane fusion. This suggests that it is involved in another cellular function catalysed by p97, the most likely being ubiquitin-dependent events during mitosis. The fact that the binding of p47 and Ufd1/Npl4 is mutually exclusive suggests that these protein complexes act as adapters, directing a basic p97 activity into different cellular pathways.     

Shp1 and Ubx2 are adaptors of Cdc48 involved in ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation

Known activities of the ubiquitin-selective AAA ATPase Cdc48 (p97) require one of the mutually exclusive cofactors Ufd1/Npl4 and Shp1 (p47). Whereas Ufd1/Npl4 recruits Cdc48 to ubiquitylated proteins destined for degradation by the 26S proteasome, the UBX domain protein p47 has so far been linked exclusively to nondegradative Cdc48 functions in membrane fusion processes. Here, we show that all seven UBX domain proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae bind to Cdc48, thus constituting an entire new family of Cdc48 cofactors. The two major yeast UBX domain proteins, Shp1 and Ubx2, possess a ubiquitin-binding UBA domain and interact with ubiquitylated proteins in vivo. Deltashp1 and Deltaubx2 strains display defects in the degradation of a ubiquitylated model substrate, are sensitive to various stress conditions and are genetically linked to the 26S proteasome. Our data suggest that Shp1 and Ubx2 are adaptors for Cdc48-dependent protein degradation through the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway.     

Analysis of Npl4 deletion mutants in mammalian cells unravels new Ufd1-interacting motifs and suggests a regulatory role of Npl4 in ERAD

Npl4 is a 67 kDa protein forming a stable heterodimer with Ufd1, which in turn binds the ubiquitous p97/VCP ATPase. According to a widely accepted model, VCP^Ufd1–Npl4 promotes the retrotranslocation of emerging ER proteins, their ubiquitination by associated ligases, and handling to the 26S proteasome for degradation in a process known as ERAD (ER-associated degradation). Using a series of Npl4 deletion mutants we have revealed that the binding of Ufd1 to Npl4 is mediated by two regions: a conserved stretch of amino acids from 113 to 255 within the zf-Npl4 domain and by the Npl4 homology domain between amino acids 263 and 344. Within the first region, we have identified two discrete subdomains: one involved in Ufd1 binding and one regulating VCP binding. Expression of any one of the mutants failed to induce any changes in the morphology of the ER or Golgi compartments. Moreover, we have observed that overexpression of all the analyzed mutants induced mild ER stress, as evidenced by increased Grp74/BiP expression without associated XBP1 splicing or induction of apoptosis. Surprisingly, we have not observed any accumulation of the typical ERAD substrate αTCR. This favors the model where the Ufd1–Npl4 dimer forms a regulatory gate at the exit from the retrotranslocone, rather than actively promoting retrotranslocation like the p97VCP ATPase.     

Proteolysis restricts localization of CID, the centromere-specific histone H3 variant of Drosophila, to centromeres

Centromere identity is determined by the formation of a specialized chromatin structure containing the centromere-specific histone H3 variant CENP-A. The precise molecular mechanism(s) accounting for the specific deposition of CENP-A at centromeres are still poorly understood. Centromeric deposition of CENP-A, which is independent of DNA replication, might involve specific chromatin assembly complexes and/or specific interactions with kinetochore components. However, transiently expressed CENP-A incorporates throughout chromatin indicating that CENP-A nucleosomes can also be promiscuously deposited during DNA replication. Therefore, additional mechanisms must exist to prevent deposition of CENP-A nucleosomes during replication and/or to remove them afterwards. Here, using transient expression experiments performed in Drosophila Kc cells, we show that proteasome-mediated degradation restricts localization of Drosophila CENP-A (CID) to centromeres by eliminating mislocalized CID as well as by regulating available CID levels. Regulating available CID levels appears essential to ensure centromeric deposition of transiently expressed CID as, when expression is increased in the presence of proteasome inhibitors, newly synthesized CID mislocalizes. Mislocalization of CID affects cell cycle progression as a high percentage of cells showing mislocalized CID are reactive against αPSer¹⁰H3 antibodies, enter mitosis at a very low frequency and show strong segregation defects. However, cells showing reduced amounts of mislocalized CID show normal cell cycle progression.     

Cdc48 and cofactors Npl4-Ufd1 are important for G1 progression during heat stress by maintaining cell wall integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The ubiquitin-selective chaperone Cdc48, a member of the AAA (ATPase Associated with various cellular Activities) ATPase superfamily, is involved in many processes, including endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD), ubiquitin- and proteasome-mediated protein degradation, and mitosis. Although Cdc48 was originally isolated as a cell cycle mutant in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, its cell cycle functions have not been well appreciated. We found that temperature-sensitive cdc48-3 mutant is largely arrested at mitosis at 37°C, whereas the mutant is also delayed in G1 progression at 38.5°C. Reporter assays show that the promoter activity of G1 cyclin CLN1, but not CLN2, is reduced in cdc48-3 at 38.5°C. The cofactor npl4-1 and ufd1-2 mutants also exhibit G1 delay and reduced CLN1 promoter activity at 38.5°C, suggesting that Npl4-Ufd1 complex mediates the function of Cdc48 at G1. The G1 delay of cdc48-3 at 38.5°C is a consequence of cell wall defect that over-activates Mpk1, a MAPK family member important for cell wall integrity in response to stress conditions including heat shock. cdc48-3 is hypersensitive to cell wall perturbing agents and is synthetic-sick with mutations in the cell wall integrity signaling pathway. Our results suggest that the cell wall defect in cdc48-3 is exacerbated by heat shock, which sustains Mpk1 activity to block G1 progression. Thus, Cdc48-Npl4-Ufd1 is important for the maintenance of cell wall integrity in order for normal cell growth and division.     

Ufd1 exhibits the AAA-ATPase fold with two distinct ubiquitin interaction sites

Ufd1 mediates ubiquitin fusion degradation by association with Npl4 and Cdc48/p97. The Ufd1-ubiquitin interaction is essential for transfer of substrates to the proteasome. However, the mechanism and specificity of ubiquitin recognition by Ufd1 are poorly understood due to the lack of detailed structural information. Here, we present the solution structure of yeast Ufd1 N domain and show that it has two distinct binding sites for mono- and polyubiquitin. The structure exhibits striking similarities to the Cdc48/p97 N domain. It contains the double-psi beta barrel motif, which is thus identified as a ubiquitin binding domain. Significantly, Ufd1 shows higher affinity toward polyubiquitin than monoubiquitin, attributable to the utilization of separate binding sites with different affinities. Further studies revealed that the Ufd1-ubiquitin interaction involves hydrophobic contacts similar to those in well-characterized ubiquitin binding proteins. Our results provide a structural basis for a previously proposed synergistic binding of polyubiquitin by Cdc48/p97 and Ufd1.     

CENP-A overexpression promotes aneuploidy with karyotypic heterogeneity

Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a hallmark of many cancers. Restricting the localization of centromeric histone H3 variant CENP-A to centromeres prevents CIN. CENP-A overexpression (OE) and mislocalization have been observed in cancers and correlate with poor prognosis; however, the molecular consequences of CENP-A OE on CIN and aneuploidy have not been defined. Here, we show that CENP-A OE leads to its mislocalization and CIN with lagging chromosomes and micronuclei in pseudodiploid DLD1 cells and xenograft mouse model. CIN is due to reduced localization of proteins to the kinetochore, resulting in defects in kinetochore integrity and unstable kinetochore–microtubule attachments. CENP-A OE contributes to reduced expression of cell adhesion genes and higher invasion of DLD1 cells. We show that CENP-A OE contributes to aneuploidy with karyotypic heterogeneity in human cells and xenograft mouse model. In summary, our results provide a molecular link between CENP-A OE and aneuploidy, and suggest that karyotypic heterogeneity may contribute to the aggressive phenotype of CENP-A–overexpressing cancers.     

Phosphorylation by Casein Kinase 2 Facilitates Psh1 Protein-assisted Degradation of Cse4 Protein

Cse4 is the centromeric histone H3 variant in budding yeast. Psh1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that controls Cse4 levels through proteolysis. Here we report that Psh1 is phosphorylated by the Cka2 subunit of casein kinase 2 (CK2) to promote its E3 activity for Cse4. Deletion of CKA2 significantly stabilized Cse4. Consistent with phosphorylation promoting the activity of Psh1, Cse4 was stabilized in a Psh1 phosphodepleted mutant strain in which the major phosphorylation sites were changed to alanines. Phosphorylation of Psh1 did not control Psh1-Cse4 or Psh1-Ubc3(E2) interactions. Although Cse4 was highly stabilized in a cka2Δ strain, mislocalization of Cse4 was mild, suggesting that Cse4 misincorporation was prevented by the intact Psh1-Cse4 association. Supporting this idea, Psh1 was also stabilized in a cka2Δ strain. Collectively our data suggest that phosphorylation is crucial in Psh1-assisted control of Cse4 levels and that the Psh1-Cse4 association itself functions to prevent Cse4 misincorporation.