The C. elegans H3K27 demethylase UTX-1 is essential for normal development, independent of its enzymatic activity

Epigenetic modifications influence gene expression and provide a unique mechanism for fine-tuning cellular differentiation and development in multicellular organisms. Here we report on the biological functions of UTX-1, the Caenorhabditis elegans homologue of mammalian UTX, a histone demethylase specific for H3K27me2/3. We demonstrate that utx-1 is an essential gene that is required for correct embryonic and postembryonic development. Consistent with its homology to UTX, UTX-1 regulates global levels of H3K27me2/3 in C. elegans. Surprisingly, we found that the catalytic activity is not required for the developmental function of this protein. Biochemical analysis identified UTX-1 as a component of a complex that includes SET-16(MLL), and genetic analysis indicates that the defects associated with loss of UTX-1 are likely mediated by compromised SET-16/UTX-1 complex activity. Taken together, these results demonstrate that UTX-1 is required for many aspects of nematode development; but, unexpectedly, this function is independent of its enzymatic activity.     

Tet1 and Tet2 regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine production and cell lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells

TET family enzymes convert 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) in DNA. Here, we show that Tet1 and Tet2 are Oct4-regulated enzymes that together sustain 5hmC in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and are induced concomitantly with 5hmC during reprogramming of fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. ESCs depleted of Tet1 by RNAi show diminished expression of the Nodal antagonist Lefty1 and display hyperactive Nodal signaling and skewed differentiation into the endoderm-mesoderm lineage in embryoid bodies in?vitro. In Fgf4- and heparin-supplemented culture conditions, Tet1-depleted ESCs activate the trophoblast stem cell lineage determinant Elf5 and can colonize the placenta in midgestation embryo chimeras. Consistent with these findings, Tet1-depleted ESCs?form aggressive hemorrhagic teratomas with increased endoderm, reduced neuroectoderm, and ectopic appearance of trophoblastic giant cells. Thus, 5hmC is an epigenetic modification associated with the pluripotent state, and Tet1 functions to regulate the lineage differentiation potential of ESCs.     

Regulation of H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 during early porcine embryonic development

The epigenetic marks H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 are important repressive and permissive histone modifications, respectively, which are involved in gene regulation such as Hox gene expression during embryonic development. In this study, we investigated the global levels of these two histone modifications. We also investigated the expression of H3K27me3's methyltransferase (EZH2), EZH2 co‐factors (EED and SUZ12) and demethylases (JMJD3 and UTX), as well as H3K4me3's methylases (ASH1L and MLL1) and demethylase (RBP2) in porcine pre‐implantation embryos. In addition, the expression of Hox genes, HOXA2, HOXA3, HOXA7, HOXA10, HOXB4, HOXB7, HOXC8, HOXD8, and HOXD10 was investigated. We found that global levels of H3K27me3 decreased from the 1‐ to the 4‐cell stage, corresponding to the time of major embryonic genome activation. Subsequently, the levels increased in hatched blastocysts, particularly in the trophectoderm. The expression levels of EZH2, EED, SUZ12, JMJD3, and UTX correlated well with these findings. The global levels of H3K4me3 decreased from the 1‐cell to the morula stage and increased in hatched blastocysts, especially in trophectoderm. A peak in expression of ASH1L was seen at the 4‐cell stage, but overall, expression of ASH1L, MLL1, and RBP2 correlated poorly with H3K4me3. HOXA3, A7, and B4 were expressed in 4‐cell embryos, and HOXA7, A10, B4, and D8 were expressed in hatched blastocysts, and did not correlate well to global methylation of H3K27me3 or H3K4me3. Thus, H3K4me3 may play a role in early porcine embryonic genome activation, whereas, H3K27me3 may be involved in initial cell lineage segregation in the blastocyst. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77: 540–549, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Polycomb-Dependent H3K27me1 and H3K27me2 Regulate Active Transcription and Enhancer Fidelity

1. Download : Download high-res image (295KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Antagonism between DNA and H3K27 methylation at the imprinted Rasgrf1 locus

At the imprinted Rasgrf1 locus in mouse, a cis-acting sequence controls DNA methylation at a differentially methylated domain (DMD). While characterizing epigenetic marks over the DMD, we observed that DNA and H3K27 trimethylation are mutually exclusive, with DNA and H3K27 methylation limited to the paternal and maternal sequences, respectively. The mutual exclusion arises because one mark prevents placement of the other. We demonstrated this in five ways: using 5-azacytidine treatments and mutations at the endogenous locus that disrupt DNA methylation; using a transgenic model in which the maternal DMD inappropriately acquired DNA methylation; and by analyzing materials from cells and embryos lacking SUZ12 and YY1. SUZ12 is part of the PRC2 complex, which is needed for placing H3K27me3, and YY1 recruits PRC2 to sites of action. Results from each experimental system consistently demonstrated antagonism between H3K27me3 and DNA methylation. When DNA methylation was lost, H3K27me3 encroached into sites where it had not been before; inappropriate acquisition of DNA methylation excluded normal placement of H3K27me3, and loss of factors needed for H3K27 methylation enabled DNA methylation to appear where it had been excluded. These data reveal the previously unknown antagonism between H3K27 and DNA methylation and identify a means by which epigenetic states may change during disease and development.     

Nbs1‐mediated DNA damage repair pathway regulates haematopoietic stem cell development and embryonic haematopoiesis

ObjectivesDNA damages pose threats to haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) maintenance and haematopoietic system homeostasis. Quiescent HSCs in adult mouse bone marrow are resistant to DNA damage, while human umbilical cord blood‐derived proliferative HSCs are prone to cell death upon ionizing radiation. Murine embryonic HSCs proliferate in foetal livers and divide symmetrically to generate HSC pool. How murine embryonic HSCs respond to DNA damages is not well‐defined.Materials and methodsMice models with DNA repair molecule Nbs1 or Nbs1/p53 specifically deleted in embryonic HSCs were generated. FACS analysis, in vitro and in vivo HSC differentiation assays, qPCR, immunofluorescence and Western blotting were used to delineate roles of Nbs1‐p53 signaling in HSCs and haematopoietic progenitors.ResultsNbs1 deficiency results in persistent DNA breaks in embryonic HSCs, compromises embryonic HSC development and finally results in mouse perinatal lethality. The persistent DNA breaks in Nbs1 deficient embryonic HSCs render cell cycle arrest, while driving a higher rate of cell death in haematopoietic progenitors. Although Nbs1 deficiency promotes Atm‐Chk2‐p53 axis activation in HSCs and their progenies, ablation of p53 in Nbs1 deficient HSCs accelerates embryonic lethality.ConclusionsOur study discloses that DNA double‐strand repair molecule Nbs1 is essential in embryonic HSC development and haematopoiesis. Persistent DNA damages result in distinct cell fate in HSCs and haematopoietic progenitors. Nbs1 null HSCs tend to be maintained through cell cycle arrest, while Nbs1 null haematopoietic progenitors commit cell death. The discrepancies are mediated possibly by different magnitude of p53 signaling.     

PGC7, H3K9me2 and Tet3: regulators of DNA methylation in zygotes

In zygotes, a global loss of DNA methylation occurs selectively in the paternal pronucleus before the first cell division, concomitantly with the appearance of modified forms of 5-methylcytosine. The adjacent maternal pronucleus and certain paternally-imprinted loci are protected from this process. Nakamura et al. recently clarified the molecular mechanism involved: PGC7/Stella/Dppa3 binds to dimethylated histone 3 lysine 9 (H3K9me2), thereby blocking the activity of the Tet3 methylcytosine oxidase in the maternal genome as well as at certain imprinted loci in the paternal genome.DNA methylation is a crucial epigenetic modification that regulates imprinting (differential silencing of maternal or paternal alleles) and repression of retrotransposons and other parasitic DNA, as well as possibly X-chromosome inactivation and cellular differentiation. DNA methylation needs to be faithfully maintained throughout the life cycle, since loss of DNA methylation can result in gene dosage problems, dysregulation of gene expression, and genomic instability due to retrotransposon reactivation¹. Nevertheless, genome-wide loss of DNA methylation has been observed during germ cell development² and in the paternal pronucleus soon after fertilization³.For almost a decade, the global decrease of DNA methylation observed in the paternal genome within a few hours of fertilization was ascribed to an “active”, replication-independent process³. The maternal pronucleus is spared and instead undergoes “passive”, replication-dependent demethylation during early embryogenesis, arising from inhibition of the DNA maintenance methyltransferase Dnmt1 (Dnmt1 is normally recruited to newly-replicated DNA because of the high affinity of its obligate partner, UHRF1, for hemi-methylated DNA strands, which are produced from symmetrically-methylated CpG dinucleotides as a result of DNA replication). The basis for active and passive demethylation of the paternal and maternal genomes remained a mystery until proteins of the TET family – TET1, TET2 and TET3 in humans – were discovered to be Fe(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent enzymes capable of oxidizing 5-methylcytosine (5mC) in DNA^4,5,6. TET enzymes serially convert 5mC into 5-hydroxymethyl-cytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC) and 5-carboxycytosine (5caC)^5,7,8.With the generation of specific antibodies to 5hmC, it became clear that the supposed “active demethylation” of the paternal pronucleus in mouse zygote after fertilization was due to the inability of anti-5mC antibodies to recognize 5hmC and other 5mC oxidation products^9,10. The enzyme responsible for 5mC oxidation was shown to be Tet3, which unlike Tet1 and Tet2 is highly expressed in mouse oocytes and zygotes. RNAi-mediated depletion of Tet3 decreased the staining of the paternal pronucleus with 5hmC, suggesting that immediately after fertilization, Tet3 in the zygote selectively oxidizes 5mC in the paternal genome to 5hmC^9,10.How is the maternal pronucleus protected from Tet3 activity? Nakamura et al.¹¹ previously showed that zygotes lacking PGC7/Stella/Dppa3 lose asymmetric regulation of DNA methylation, instead showing global loss of 5mC staining in both paternal and maternal pronuclei. This was correlated with hypomethylation at several maternally-imprinted loci (Peg1, Peg3, Peg10) in PGC7-deficient zygotes, as judged by bisulfite sequencing. Further, certain paternally-imprinted loci (H19, Rasgrf1), which are normally protected from global loss of methylation in the paternal genome, also became hypomethylated in PGC7-deficient zygotes. These data suggested that PGC7 protects the maternal genome, as well as certain paternally imprinted loci, from loss of 5mC.In their recent publication, Nakamura et al.¹² elegantly extended these findings to address the mechanism involved. Based on the fact that a major difference between maternal and paternal genomes is that the maternal genome contains histones, whereas the DNA of the entering sperm is tightly packaged with protamine, they asked whether PGC7 recognizes specific histone marks. Indeed, the maternal genome harbors considerable levels of the histone mark H3K9me2¹¹, leading them to examine whether PGC7 distinguishes maternal and paternal genomes by recognizing H3K9me2 in the maternal genome. Using wild-type (WT) ES cells and ES cells deficient in the G9a lysine methyltransferase which generates H3K9me2 mark, they showed that PGC7 associated loosely with nucleosomes and chromatin lacking H3K9me2, but tightly if H3K9me2 was present. The binding was recapitulated using recombinant bacterially-expressed PGC7 and histone tail peptides, indicating a direct interaction of PGC7 with the H3K9me2 mark. In agreement, genomic loci enriched with H3K9me2 recruited PGC7 as judged by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), but this recruitment was abrogated in G9a-deficient ES cells. These data indicated that PGC7 targets genomic regions occupied by nucleosomes containing H3K9me2 (Figure 1); an interesting extension would be to ask whether loss of maternal G9a also results in 5hmC conversion in the maternal pronucleus in zygotes.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Schematic view of paternal (left) and maternal (right) genomes soon after fertilization. Paternal and maternal pronuclei are indicated with immunostaining results in the boxes. PGC7 binds H3K9me2 in the maternal pronucleus and at certain paternally-imprinted loci (H19, Rasgrf1) in the paternal pronucleus, thereby potentially regulating chromatin organization to interfere with Tet3 accessibility.Next, Nakamura et al.¹² tested by immunocytochemistry whether PGC7 in zygotes also required H3K9me2. It is known that H3K9me2 staining is concentrated in the maternal but not the paternal pronucleus¹³. Using conventional staining methods in which the cells are first fixed and then permeabilized to allow antibodies to enter the cell, the authors observed in their earlier study that PGC7 bound to both pronuclei¹¹. Remarkably, by simply reversing the order of the fixation and permeabilization steps – permeabilizing first to allow the loss of loosely bound proteins by dissociation, then fixing and staining – they found that PGC7 associated much more tightly with the maternal pronucleus that bears H3K9me2 mark. Injection of mRNA encoding Jhdm2a (an H3K9me1/ me2-specific demethylase) into zygotes eliminated staining for H3K9me2 as well as PGC7 in the maternal pronucleus, and concomitantly caused loss of 5mC and acquisition of 5hmC. Taken together, these data strongly suggested that PGC7 was selectively recruited to the maternal pronucleus through binding H3K9me2, and that this binding protected zygotic maternal DNA from oxidation of 5mC to 5hmC and beyond (Figure 1).These findings led Nakamura et al. to investigate how PGC7 controls Tet3 activity in zygotes. They showed (in cells that were permeabilized before fixation and immunocytochemistry) that Tet3 was tightly associated only with the paternal pronucleus in WT zygotes, but was present in both pronuclei in PGC7-deficient zygotes. When PGC7 was prevented from binding to the maternal pronucleus by injection of Jhdm2a mRNA, Tet3 became tightly associated with both pronuclei. In other words, loss of PGC7 or loss of H3K9me2 that recruits PGC7 had the same effect – eliminating selective association of Tet3 with the paternal genome. The implication is that PGC7 – which preferentially binds the maternal genome – somehow promotes the selective binding of Tet3 to the paternal genome, thus permitting rapid 5mC oxidation in paternal but not maternal DNA (Figure 1).PGC7 is a small protein (150 amino acids (aa) in the mouse, 159 aa in humans) whose sequence is only moderately conserved. Nakamura et al.¹² showed that the binding of PGC7 to H3K9me2 required the N-terminal half of PGC7, whereas its ability to exclude Tet3 from the maternal pronucleus required the C-terminal half. It is unclear how Tet3 exclusion is mediated. One possibility is that the C-terminal region of PGC7 sterically excludes Tet3 from binding, either to DNA or to a chromatin mark; another is that the C-terminal region of PGC7 is capable of altering chromatin configuration to prevent the binding of Tet3 to chromatin. In support of the latter hypothesis, the rate with which micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digested high-molecular weight chromatin was significantly slower in WT ES cells in which PGC7 was present, compared to PGC7^−/− and G9a^−/− ES cells in which PGC7 was either absent or not recruited to DNA because of the loss of H3K9me2 mark. In contrast, DNA methylation did not alter the chromatin association of PGC7 or its ability to protect high-molecular weight chromatin from MNase digestion, as shown by using Dnmt1^−/−Dnmt3a^−/−Dnmt3b^−/− triple knockout ES cells that completely lack DNA methylation.How does PGC7 protect paternally-imprinted loci from Tet3-mediated 5mC oxidation? Although the haploid sperm genome is mostly packaged with protamine, a genome-wide analysis revealed that 4% of the genome of mature human sperm bears nucleosomes located at developmental and imprinted genes¹⁴. Nakamura et al.¹² found that among paternally-imprinted differentially methylated regions (DMRs), the H19 and Rasgrf1 DMRs contained H3K9me2 whereas the Meg3 DMR did not, consistent with their previous finding that in PGC7-deficient zygotes, the H19 and Rasgrf1 DMRs were hypomethylated but the Meg3 DMR was unaffected¹¹. Therefore, PGC7 may be recruited to paternally-imprinted loci through H3K9me2-containing nucleosomes that pre-exist in the sperm haploid genome upon fertilization. Alternatively, Nakamura et al. point out that protamine in the sperm is replaced soon after fertilization by the histone H3.3 variant, which in somatic cells does not bear H3K9me2 mark.In conclusion, Nakamura et al.¹² demonstrate unambiguously that PGC7 specifically binds to H3K9me2 in the maternal genome in zygotes, where its global occupancy excludes Tet3 and inhibits Tet3-mediated 5mC oxidation. This novel finding provides new insights into the global alterations of DNA methylation status that occur during early embryogenesis. Follow-up questions abound. First, can PGC7 protect other methylated loci such as transposable elements and the X-chromosome? It would be interesting to assess H3K9me2 at these loci. Second, how does the N-terminal half of PGC7 recognize H3K9me2? Structural characterization of this interaction may elucidate a novel epigenetic “reader” domain specific for H3K9me2. Third, PGC7 is a marker for cells of the inner cell mass, and is co-expressed with Tet1 and Tet2 rather than Tet3 in ESCs¹⁵. Does PGC7 also antagonize Tet1 and Tet2 and protect imprinted loci in ESCs? Fourth, how does PGC7 inhibit the access of Tet3 to chromatin? Considering that PGC7 is small and is not equipped with known enzymatic domains, it is likely that PGC-interacting proteins, rather than PGC7 itself, function to regulate chromatin status. Fifth, how is Tet3 recruited to paternal chromatin – are there specific histone or other epigenetic marks that facilitate Tet3 recruitment? Finally, while technically challenging, it seems imperative to identify the target genes of PGC7 and Tet3, by profiling the genomic location of 5hmC and other 5mC oxidation products in the paternal and maternal genomes of zygotes from WT, Tet3-deficient and PGC7-deficient mice.