Speculations on the evolution of the genetic code

An evolutionary scheme is postulated in which the bases enter the genetic code in a definite temporal sequence and the correlated amino acids are assigned definite functions in the evolving system.The scheme requires a singlet code (guanine coding for glycine) evolving into a doublet code (guanine-cytosine doublet coding for gly (GG), ala (GC), arg (CG), pro (CC)). The doublet code evolves into a triplet code. Polymerization of nucleotides is thought to have been by block polymerization rather than by a template mechanism. The proteins formed at first were simple structural peptides. No direct nucleotide-amino acid stereo-chemical interaction was required. Rather an adaptor-type indirect mechanism is thought to have been functioning since the origin.     

Speculations on the evolution of the genetic code II

An evolutionary scheme is postulated in which a primitive code, involving only guanine and cytosine, would code for glycine (GG), alanine (GC), arginine (CG) and proline (CC). From each of these amino acids and their codons, there evolves a family of related amino acids as the code expands. The four families are: (1)alanine valine, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, methionine and tryptophane; (2)proline, threonine and serine; (3)arginine, lysine, and histidine; (4)glycine, serine, cysteine, glutamic acid, glutamine, aspartic acid and asparagine. Except for the glycine relation to glutamic acid and aspartic acid, all amino acids are related by chemical similarities in their side chains. Glycine not having a side chain would permit a more complex set of substitutions.     

Speculations on the evolution of the genetic code.

An evolutionary scheme is postulated in which the bases enter the genetic code in a definite temporal sequence and the correlated amino acids are assigned definite functions in the evolving system. The scheme requires a singlet code (guanine coding for glycine) evolving into a doublet code (guanine-cytosine doublet coding for gly (GG), ala (GC), arg (CG), pro (CC). The doublet code evolves into a triplet code. Polymerization of nucleotides is thought to have been by block polymerization rather than by a template mechanism. The proteins formed at first were simple structural peptides. No direct nucleotide-amino acid stereo-chemical interaction was required. Rather an adaptor-type indirect mechanism is thought to have been functioning since the origin.     

Speculations on the evolution of the genetic code IV the evolution of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

An evolutionary scheme is postulated in which a primitive code, involving only guanine and cytosine, would code for glycine(GG.), alanine(GC), arginine(CG.) and proline(CC). There evolves from this primitive code families of related amino acids as the code expands. The evolution of the aminiacyl-tRNA synthetases are considered to be indicators for the evolution of the genetic code. The postulated model for the evolution of the genetic code is used to give an evolutionary interpretation to the recent work on the structure and sequences of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.     

Speculations on the origin of the genetic code

The most primitive code is assumed to be a GC code: GG coding for glycine, CC coding for proline, GC coding for alanine, CG coding for arginine. The genetic code is assumed to have originated with the coupling of glycine to its anticodon CC mediated by a copper-montmorillonite. The polymerization of polyproline followed when it was coupled to its anticodon GG. In this case the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase was a copper-montmorillonite. The first membrane is considered to be a sheet formed from polyglycine. As the code grew more complicated, the alternative hydrophobic-hydrophilic polypeptide (alanine-arginine) was coded for by the alternating CG copolymer. This alternating polypeptide (ala-arg) began to function as both a primitive membrane and as an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. The evolution of protein structure is tightly coupled to the evolution of the membrane. The a helix was evolved as lipids became part of the structure of biological membranes. The membrane finally became the fluid mosaic structure that is now universal.Based on a presentation made at a workshop-Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases and the Evolution of the Genetic Code-held at Berkeley, CA, July 17–20, 1994     

The role of the genetic code in protein evolution

The arrangement and degeneracy of triplets in the genetic code play an important but not inclusive part in protein evolution. In particular, data indicate that the genetic code is insufficient to account for the existence of homologous proteins. A novel theory is proposed suggesting that homologous proteins are the existing part of a discrete probability class whose members are genetically intermutable and whose size is delimited by natural selection.     

The evolution of the mitochondrial genetic code in arthropods revisited

A variant of the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code was previously identified in arthropods (Abascal et al. 2006a, PLoS Biol 4:e127) in which, instead of translating the AGG codon as serine, as in other invertebrates, some arthropods translate AGG as lysine. Here, we revisit the evolution of the genetic code in arthropods taking into account that (1) the number of arthropod mitochondrial genomes sequenced has triplicated since the original findings were published; (2) the phylogeny of arthropods has been recently resolved with confidence for many groups; and (3) sophisticated probabilistic methods can be applied to analyze the evolution of the genetic code in arthropod mitochondria. According to our analyses, evolutionary shifts in the genetic code have been more common than previously inferred, with many taxonomic groups displaying two alternative codes. Ancestral character-state reconstruction using probabilistic methods confirmed that the arthropod ancestor most likely translated AGG as lysine. Point mutations at tRNA-Lys and tRNA-Ser correlated with the meaning of the AGG codon. In addition, we identified three variables (GC content, number of AGG codons, and taxonomic information) that best explain the use of each of the two alternative genetic codes.     

The genetic code constrains yet facilitates Darwinian evolution

An important goal of evolutionary biology is to understand the constraints that shape the dynamics and outcomes of evolution. Here, we address the extent to which the structure of the standard genetic code constrains evolution by analyzing adaptive mutations of the antibiotic resistance gene TEM-1 β-lactamase and the fitness distribution of codon substitutions in two influenza hemagglutinin inhibitor genes. We find that the architecture of the genetic code significantly constrains the adaptive exploration of sequence space. However, the constraints endow the code with two advantages: the ability to restrict access to amino acid mutations with a strong negative effect and, most remarkably, the ability to enrich for adaptive mutations. Our findings support the hypothesis that the standard genetic code was shaped by selective pressure to minimize the deleterious effects of mutation yet facilitate the evolution of proteins through imposing an adaptive mutation bias.     

Ambiguity and the evolution of the genetic code

The evolution of the genetic code is an extremely complex problem. The addition of a new method by which the code could evolve, however, allows much to be explained about the way in which the present codes (₃ and ₃ ) originated. The idea that ambiguity would allow the length of the codon to change is very useful, since it predicts the distribution of the 4-blocs and 2-blocs in the code, determines where variations in the code are probable, and presents a scenario for the evolution of the code.     

A new hypothesis on the evolution of the genetic code

Summary Starting from the assumption that specific steric and energetic interactions between amino acids and their respective anticodons could exist, the evolution of the genetic code is deduced from purely chemical and physical reasons. In this model the amino acids are intercalated between the two first anticodon bases and their carbon bound hydrogen atoms are assumed to penetrate into the electron clouds of the bases. By these means a gain in energy and a fixation of the amino acid is obtained in such a way that the anticodon nucleotides could be determinant for the nature of the amino acids.     

The meaning of the genetic code: reconstruction of the stage of prebiologic evolution

According to a certain order in sets of the two first codon bases, 20 common amino acids can be divided into 5 families each containing 4 amino acids; the corresponding order in the distribution of codon bases can be easily detected, if common amino acids are distributed for the numbers of hydrogen atoms per molecule (Sukhodolets, 1980). In the present paper, the order in the distribution of codon bases is explained on the basis of the hypothesis claiming the prebiological existence of crystalline associates composed of amino acids and bases as free molecules. In these heterogeneous crystalline associates amino acids were analogs to the base douplets and the arrangement of molecules followed a certain rule, namely: 40 protons per molecular complex forming a standard structural compartment. It is proposed that the crystalline associates existed as lyotropic liquid crystals with hydrocarbons as solvent. The genetical code allows to discover two different original crystallization types for bases and amino acids. Therefore, the life possibly originates from combining in the same structure different crystallization patterns, which resulted in formation of a finite crystalline associate.     

The standard genetic code enhances adaptive evolution of proteins

The standard genetic code, by which most organisms translate genetic material into protein metabolism, is non-randomly organized. The Error Minimization hypothesis interprets this non-randomness as an adaptation, proposing that natural selection produced a pattern of codon assignments that buffers genomes against the impact of mutations. Indeed, on the average any given point mutation has a lesser effect on the chemical properties of the utilized amino acid than expected by chance. Might it also, however, be the case that the non-random nature of the code effects the rate of adaptive evolution? To investigate this, here we develop population genetic simulations to test the rate of adaptive gene evolution under different genetic codes. We identify two independent properties of a genetic code that profoundly influence the speed of adaptive evolution. Noting that the standard genetic code exhibits both, we offer a new insight into the effects of the "error minimizing" code: such a code enhances the efficacy of adaptive sequence evolution.     

The molecular mechanism of evolution of changes in the genetic code

Alterations to the standard genetic code have been found in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. This finding demolished the central dogma of molecular biology, postulated by Crick in 1968, of an immutable and universal genetic code and raised the question of how organisms survive genetic code alterations? Recent studies suggest that genetic code alterations are driven by selection using a mechanism that requires translational ambiguity. In C. albicans, the leucine CUG codon is decoded as serine through structural alterations of the translational machinery, in particular, of a Ser-tRNACAG which has dual identity and novel decoding properties. Here, we review the molecular mechanism of CUG reassignment focusing on the structural change of the translational machinery and on the impact that such alteration had on the evolution of the Candida albicans genome.     

Local stability and evolution of the genetic code

The standard genetic code is known to be robust to translation errors and point mutations. We studied how small modifications of the standard code affect its robustness. The robustness was assessed in terms of a proper stability function, the negative variations of which correspond to a more robust code. The fraction of more robust codes obtained under small modifications appeared to be unexpectedly high, about 0.1-0.4 depending on the choice of stability function and code modifications, yet significantly lower than the corresponding fraction in the random codes (about a half). In this sense the standard code ought to be considered distinctly non-random in accordance with previous observations. The distribution of the negative variations of stability function revealed very abrupt drop beyond one standard deviation, much sharper than for Gaussian distribution or for the random codes with the same number of codons in the sets coding for amino acids or stop-codons. This behavior holds for both the standard code as a whole and its binary NRN-NYN, NWN-NSN, and NMN-NKN blocks. Previously, it has been proved that such binary block structure is necessary for the robustness of a code and is inherent to the standard genetic code. The modifications of the standard code corresponding to more robust coding may be related to the different variants of the code. These effects may also contribute to the rates of replacements of amino acids. The observed features demonstrate the joint impact of random factors and natural selection during evolution of the genetic code.     

Symmetry preservation in the evolution of the genetic code

The standard genetic code is found to exhibit an exact symmetry under a finite group of order 4 known in mathematics as the Klein group. The same symmetry is also present in almost all non-standard codes, mitochondrial as well as nuclear. Analysis of the phylogenetic tree for the evolution of the mitochondrial codes reveals that all changes along the main line of evolution preserve this symmetry, with a tendency towards symmetry enhancement. In the side branches of the evolutionary tree, the majority of changes also respect the symmetry. The few exceptional cases where it is broken correspond to reassignments that appear to be unstable or incomplete. Since the Klein group emerges naturally from the symplectic model for the prebiotic evolution that has led to the standard code, we interpret these results as lending support to the hypothesis that this symmetry has been selected during the evolution of the genetic code, not only before but also after establishment of the standard code.     

On the origin and evolution of the genetic code

Two ideas have essentially been used to explain the origin of the genetic code: Crick's frozen accident and Woese's amino acid-codon specific chemical interaction. Whatever the origin and codon-amino acid correlation, it is difficult to imagine the sudden appearance of the genetic code in its present form of 64 codons coding for 20 amino acids without appealing to some evolutionary process. On the contrary, it is more reasonable to assume that it evolved from a much simpler initial state in which a few triplets were coding for each of a small number of amino acids. Analysis of genetic code through information theory and the metabolism of pyrimidine biosynthesis provide evidence that suggests that the genetic code could have begun in an RNA world with the two letters A and U grouped in eight triplets coding for seven amino acids and one stop signal. This code could have progressively evolved by making gradual use of letters G and C to end with 64 triplets coding for 20 amino acids and three stop signals. According to proposed evidence, DNA could have appeared after the four-letter structure was already achieved. In the newborn DNA world, T substituted U to get higher physicochemical and genetic stability.