Glu257 in GroEL is a sensor involved in coupling polypeptide substrate binding to stimulation of ATP hydrolysis

The ATPase activity of many types of molecular chaperones is stimulated by polypeptide substrate binding via molecular mechanisms that are, for the most part, unknown. Here, we report that such stimulation of the ATPase activity of GroEL is abolished when its conserved apical domain residue Glu257 is replaced by alanine. This mutation is also found to convert the ATPase profile of GroEL, a group I chaperonin, into one that is characteristic of group II chaperonins. Steady-state and transient kinetic analysis indicate that both effects are due, at least in part, to a reduction of the affinity of GroEL for ADP. This finding indicates that nonfolded proteins stimulate ATP hydrolysis by accelerating the off-rate of the ADP formed, thereby allowing more rapid cycles of ATP binding and hydrolysis.     

Transient kinetic analysis of ATP-induced allosteric transitions in the eukaryotic chaperonin containing TCP-1

The chaperonin CCT (chaperonin containing t-complex polypeptide 1 (TCP-1)) from bovine testis was mixed rapidly with different concentrations of ATP and the time-resolved change in fluorescence emission, upon excitation at 280 nm, was followed. Two kinetic phases were observed and assigned by (i) analyzing the dependence of the corresponding observed rate constants on ATP concentration; and (ii) by carrying out mixing experiments also with ADP, ATPgammaS and ATP without K(+). The values of the observed rate constants corresponding to both phases are found to be dependent on ATP concentration. The observed rate constant corresponding to the fast phase displays a bi-sigmoidal dependence on ATP concentration with Hill coefficients that are similar to those determined in steady-state ATPase experiments. This phase most likely reflects ATP binding-induced conformational changes. The rate constant of the conformational change in the presence of excess ATP is about 17s(-1) (at 25 degrees C) and is tenfold slower than the corresponding rate constant of GroEL. The observed rate constant corresponding to the second slower phase displays a hyperbolic dependence on ATP concentration. This phase is not observed in mixing experiments of CCT with ADP, ATPgammaS or ATP without K(+) and it, therefore, reflects a conformational change associated with ATP hydrolysis. Taken together, our results indicate that the kinetic mechanism of the allosteric transitions of CCT differs considerably from that of GroEL.     

Kinetic analysis of ATP-dependent inter-ring communication in GroEL

Different concentrations of ATP were mixed rapidly with single-ring or double-ring forms of GroEL containing the Phe44-->Trp mutation and the time-resolved changes in fluorescence emission, upon excitation at 295 nm, were followed. Two kinetic phases that were previously found for double-ring GroEL are also observed in the case of the single-ring version: (i) a fast phase with a relatively large amplitude that is associated with the T-->R allosteric transition; (ii) and a slow phase with a smaller amplitude that is associated with ATP hydrolysis. In the case of weak intra-ring positive cooperativity, the rate constant corresponding to the T-->R allosteric switch of single-ring GroEL displays a bi-sigmoidal dependence on ATP concentration that may reflect parallel pathways of the allosteric transition. The slow phase is absent when double-ring or single-ring forms of GroEL are mixed with ADP or ATP without K(+), and it has a rate constant that is independent of ATP concentration. A third fast phase that is still unassigned is observed for both single-ring and double-ring GroEL when a large amount of data is collected. Finally, a fourth phase is observed in the case of double-ring GroEL that is found to be absent in the case of single-ring GroEL. This phase is here assigned to inter-ring communication by (i) determining its dependence on ATP concentration and (ii) based on its absence from single-ring GroEL and the Arg13-->Gly, Ala126-->Val GroEL mutant, which is defective in inter-ring negative cooperativity. The value of the rate constant corresponding to this phase is found to increase with increasing intra-ring positive cooperativity, with respect to ATP. This is the first report of the rate of ATP-mediated inter-ring communication in GroEL, in the presence of ATP alone, which is crucial for the cycling of this molecular machine between different functional states.     

Nested allosteric interactions in the cytoplasmic chaperonin containing TCP-1

Initial rates of ATP hydrolysis by the chaperonin containing TCP-1 (CCT) from bovine testis were measured as a function of ATP concentration. Two allosteric transitions are observed: one at relatively low concentrations of ATP (<100 microM) and the second at higher concentrations of ATP. The data suggest that CCT has positive intra-ring cooperativity and negative inter-ring cooperativity in ATP hydrolysis, with respect to ATP, as previously observed in the case of GroEL. It is shown that the relatively weak positive intra-ring cooperativity found in the case of CCT may be due to heterogeneity in its subunit composition. Our results suggest that nested allosteric behavior may be common to chaperone double-ring systems.     

GroEL walks the fine line: the subtle balance of substrate and co-chaperonin binding by GroEL. A combinatorial investigation by design, selection and screening

While support in protein folding by molecular chaperones is extremely efficient for endogenous polypeptides, it often fails for recombinant proteins in a bacterial host, thus constituting a major hurdle for protein research and biotechnology. To understand the reasons for this difference and to answer the question of whether it is feasible to design tailor-made chaperones, we investigated one of the most prominent bacterial chaperones, the GroEL/ES ring complex. On the basis of structural data, we designed and constructed a combinatorial GroEL library, where the substrate-binding site was randomized. Screening and selection experiments with this library demonstrated that substrate binding and release is supported by many variants, but the majority of the library members failed to assist in chaperonin-mediated protein folding under conditions where spontaneous folding is suppressed. These findings revealed a conflict between binding of substrate and binding of the co-chaperonin GroES. As a consequence, the window of mutational freedom in that region of GroEL is very small. In screening experiments, we could identify GroEL variants slightly improved for a given substrate, which were still promiscuous. As the substrate-binding site of the GroEL molecule overlaps strongly with the site of cofactor binding, the outcome of our experiments suggests that maintenance of cofactor binding affinity is more critical for chaperonin-mediated protein folding than energetically optimized substrate recognition.     

Cooperativity in the thermosome

The thermosome from Thermoplasma acidophilum is a type II chaperonin composed of eight alpha and eight beta subunits. The genes encoding the two types of subunit were co-expressed in Escherichia coli and the alpha8/beta8 complex purified from the cell extract. The isolated complex showed steady-state ATPase properties characteristic of the thermosome purified from the native organism and was capable of enhancing the folding yield of a thermostable enzyme at elevated temperature (55 degrees C). To compare the nucleotide response of this double-ring structure with the type I and more compositionally heterogeneous type II chaperonins, the tryptophan residue within the alpha subunit was used as a fluorescence reporter of the conformational changes within the thermosome induced by the binding of nucleotides. Stopped-flow measurements of indole fluorescence at 55 degrees C showed that there is a fast (approximately 350 s(-1)) and a slow (approximately 0.6 s(-1)) structural rearrangement when ATP binds to the thermosome. Further examination of the fast rearrangement showed that the associated rate constant followed a two-phase saturation profile, as it does for GroEL and for the type II chaperonin from the eukaryotic cytoplasm. This result, in keeping with these precedents, reveals that the thermosome is also a negatively cooperative system with respect to inter-ring communications, i.e. the first ring loads with higher affinity than the second. As in the case of GroEL, the loading of the second ring is weakened by ADP, implying that asymmetric ATP/ADP complexes are favoured over symmetric ones. Despite the difference in co-protein involvement in the type I and II chaperonins, these observations show that negative cooperativity is a common feature of all chaperonins thus far examined. This property results in a strong preference for asymmetry in nucleotide occupancy and implies at least some commonality with the reciprocating encapsulation mechanism shown for the GroE chaperonins.     

A kinetic analysis of the nucleotide-induced allosteric transitions in a single-ring mutant of GroEL

The function of GroE requires a complex system of allosteric communication driven by protein-nucleotide interactions. These rearrangements couple the binding and hydrolysis of ATP to an overall reaction cycle in which substrate proteins are bound, encapsulated and released. Positive cooperativity with respect to ATP binding occurs within one heptameric ring of GroEL, while negative cooperativity between the two rings generates an inherent asymmetry between the two rings. A previously engineered mutant of GroEL in which the ring-ring contacts are broken gives rise to a single-ring version of the wild-type chaperonin (SR1). We have studied the kinetics of the nucleotide-induced conformational changes in a single-tryptophan variant of SR1 (Y485W-SR1) and compared the resulting data with those we reported previously for the double-ring, single-tryptophan variant of wild-type GroEL (Y485W-GroEL). Remarkably, the parting of the rings does not have a major effect on the conformational changes occurring within the heptameric ring and a kinetic model is presented to describe the sequence of structural rearrangements that occur upon ATP binding to the SR1 molecule. The observation that both the ATP-induced and ADP-induced conformational rearrangements occur more rapidly in the SR1 than they do in wild-type GroEL, indicates that intra-ring conformational changes in the double-ring structure must overcome conformational constraints provided by the presence of the second ring. Lastly, the data presented here imply a role for inter-ring allostery in controlling the dissociation-association behaviour of the GroES co-protein in the overall reaction cycle.     

Crystal structure of wild-type chaperonin GroEL

The 2.9A resolution crystal structure of apo wild-type GroEL was determined for the first time and represents the reference structure, facilitating the study of structural and functional differences observed in GroEL variants. Until now the crystal structure of the mutant Arg13Gly, Ala126Val GroEL was used for this purpose. We show that, due to the mutations as well as to the presence of a crystallographic symmetry, the ring-ring interface was inaccurately described. Analysis of the present structure allowed the definition of structural elements at this interface, essential for understanding the inter-ring allosteric signal transmission. We also show unambiguously that there is no ATP-induced 102 degrees rotation of the apical domain helix I around its helical axis, as previously assumed in the crystal structure of the (GroEL-KMgATP)(14) complex, and analyze the apical domain movements. These results enabled us to compare our structure with other GroEL crystal structures already published, allowing us to suggest a new route through which the allosteric signal for negative cooperativity propagates within the molecule. The proposed mechanism, supported by known mutagenesis data, underlines the importance of the switching of salt bridges.     

Multiple chaperonins in bacteria – why so many?

A significant proportion of bacteria express two or more chaperonin genes. Chaperonins are a group of molecular chaperones, defined by sequence similarity, required for the folding of some cellular proteins. Chaperonin monomers have a mass of c . 60 kDa, and are typically found as large protein complexes containing 14 subunits arranged in two rings. The mechanism of action of the Escherichia coli GroEL protein has been studied in great detail. It acts by binding to unfolded proteins and enabling them to fold in a protected environment where they do not interact with any other proteins. GroEL can assist the folding of many proteins of different sizes, sequences, and structures, and homologues from many different bacteria can functionally replace GroEL in E. coli . What then are the functions of multiple chaperonins? Do they provide a mechanism for cells to increase their general chaperoning ability, or have they become specialized to take on specific novel cellular roles? Here I will review the genetic, biochemical, and phylogenetic evidence that has a bearing on this question, and show that there is good evidence for at least some specificity of function in multiple chaperonin genes.     

Structural and functional conservation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL paralogs suggests that GroEL1 Is a chaperonin

GroEL is a group I chaperonin that facilitates protein folding and prevents protein aggregation in the bacterial cytosol. Mycobacteria are unusual in encoding two or more copies of GroEL in their genome. While GroEL2 is essential for viability and likely functions as the general housekeeping chaperonin, GroEL1 is dispensable, but its structure and function remain unclear.Here, we present the 2.2-Å resolution crystal structure of a 23-kDa fragment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL1 consisting of an extended apical domain. Our X-ray structure of the GroEL1 apical domain closely resembles those of Escherichia coli GroEL and M. tuberculosis GroEL2, thus highlighting the remarkable structural conservation of bacterial chaperonins. Notably, in our structure, the proposed substrate-binding site of GroEL1 interacts with the N-terminal region of a symmetry-related neighboring GroEL1 molecule. The latter is consistent with the known GroEL apical domain function in substrate binding and is supported by results obtained from using peptide array technology. Taken together, these data show that the apical domains of M. tuberculosis GroEL paralogs are conserved in three-dimensional structure, suggesting that GroEL1, like GroEL2, is a chaperonin.     

Isolation and characterisation of mutants of GroEL that are fully functional as single rings

A key aspect of the reaction mechanism for the molecular chaperone GroEL is the transmission of an allosteric signal between the two rings of the GroEL complex. Thus, the single-ring mutant SR1 is unable to act as a chaperone as it cannot release bound substrate or GroES. We used a simple selection procedure to identify mutants of SR1 that restored chaperone activity in vivo. A large number of single amino acid changes, mapping at diverse positions throughout the protein, enabled SR1 to regain its ability to act as a chaperone while remaining as a single ring. In vivo assays were used to identify the proteins that had regained maximal activity. In some cases, no difference could be detected between strains expressing wild-type GroEL and those expressing the mutated proteins. Three of the most active proteins where the mutations were in distinct parts of the protein were purified to homogeneity and characterised in vitro. All were capable of acting efficiently as chaperones for two different GroES-dependent substrates. All three proteins bound nucleotide as effectively as did GroEL, but the binding of GroES in the presence of ATP or ADP was reduced significantly relative to the wild-type. These active single rings should provide a useful tool for studying the nature of the allosteric changes that occur in the GroEL reaction cycle.     

Characterisation of mutations in GroES that allow GroEL to function as a single ring

The chaperonin GroEL contains two seven-subunit rings, and allosteric signals between them are required to complete the GroEL reaction cycle. For this reason SR1, a mutant of GroEL that forms only single rings, cannot function as a chaperone. Mutations in SR1 that restore chaperone function weaken its interaction with the cochaperonin GroES. We predicted that GroES mutants with reduced affinity for GroEL would also restore function to SR1. To test this, we mutated residues in GroES in and near its contact site with GroEL. Nearly half of the mutants showed partial function with SR1. Two mutants were confirmed to have reduced affinity for GroEL. Intriguingly, some GroES mutants were able to function with active single ring mutants of GroEL.     

Molecular Mechanism of J-Domain-Triggered ATP Hydrolysis by Hsp70 Chaperones

1. Download high-res image (215KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

The substrate recognition mechanisms in chaperonins

Chaperonins are a family of proteins devoted to assisting the folding of other proteins. They are large oligomers assembled into ring structures that enclose a cavity in which folding takes place. For this process to occur, the chaperonin must first recognize and interact with the unfolded polypeptide, then undergo a conformational change upon nucleotide binding that results in the closure of the cavity which in turn mediates the folding reaction inside the cavity. Although this general mechanism seems to apply to every chaperonin studied so far, there exist two different modes of interaction between the chaperonin and the substrate. The first occurs mainly through the interaction between the exposed hydrophobic residues of the unfolded polypeptides and those of the chaperonin substrate binding site, as elucidated for the chaperonin GroEL from E. coli. The second type of mechanism has been described so far only for the cytosolic chaperonin CCT (Chaperonin Containing TCP-1) and here the interaction seems to be of a more specific nature, involving charged and polar residues in both the chaperonin and the substrate, which interacts with CCT in a structured, quasi-native conformation.     

GroEL/GroES: structure and function of a two-stroke folding machine

Recent structural and functional studies have greatly advanced our understanding of the mechanism by which chaperonins (Cpn60) mediate protein folding, the final step in the accurate expression of genetic information. Escherichia coli GroEL has a symmetric double-toroid architecture, which binds nonnative polypeptide substrates on the hydrophobic walls of its central cavity. The asymmetric binding of ATP and cochaperonin GroES to GroEL triggers a major conformational change in the cis ring, creating an enlarged chamber into which the bound nonnative polypeptide is released. The structural changes that create the cis assembly also change the lining of the cavity wall from hydrophobic to hydrophilic, conducive to folding into the native state. ATP hydrolysis in the cis ring weakens it and primes the release of products. When ATP and GroES bind to the trans ring, it forms a stronger assembly, which disassembles the cis complex through negative cooperativity between rings. The opposing function of the two rings operates as if the system had two cylinders, one expelling the products of the reaction as the other loads up the reactants. One cycle of the reaction gives the polypeptide about 15 s to fold at the cost of seven ATP molecules. For some proteins, several cycles of GroEL assistance may be needed in order to achieve their native states.     

The allosteric transition of GroEL induced by metal fluoride-ADP complexes

To understand the mechanism of a functionally important ATP-induced allosteric transition of GroEL, we have studied the effect of a series of metal fluoride-ADP complexes and vanadate-ADP on GroEL by kinetic fluorescence measurement of pyrene-labeled GroEL and by small-angle X-ray scattering measurement of wild-type GroEL. The metal fluorides and vanadate, complexed with ADP, are known to mimic the gamma-phosphate group of ATP, but they differ in geometry and size; it is expected that these compounds will be useful for investigating the strikingly high specificity of GroEL for ATP that enables the induction of the allosteric transition. The kinetic fluorescence measurement revealed that aluminium, beryllium, and gallium ions, when complexed with the fluoride ion and ADP, induced a biphasic fluorescence change of pyrenyl GroEL, while scandium and vanadate ions did not induce any kinetically observed change in fluorescence. The burst phase and the first phase of the fluorescence kinetics were reversible, while the second phase and subsequent changes were irreversible. The dependence of the burst-phase and the first-phase fluorescence changes on the ADP concentration indicated that the burst phase represents non-cooperative nucleotide binding to GroEL, and that the first phase represents the allosteric transition of GroEL. Both the amplitude and the rate constant of the first phase of the fluorescence kinetics were well understood in terms of a kinetic allosteric model, which is a combination of transition state theory and the Monod-Wyman-Changeux allosteric model. From the kinetic allosteric model analysis, the relative free energy of the transition state in the metal fluoride-ADP-induced allosteric transition of GroEL was found to be larger than the corresponding free energy of the ATP-induced allosteric transition by more than 5.5kcal/mol. However, the X-ray scattering measurements indicated that the allosteric state induced by these metal fluoride-ADP complexes is structurally equivalent to the allosteric state induced by ATP. These results suggested that both the size and coordination geometry of gamma-phosphate (and its analogs) are related to the allosteric transition of GroEL. It was therefore concluded that the tetrahedral geometry of gamma-phosphate (or its analogs) and the inter-atomic distance ( approximately 1.6A) between phosphorus (vanadium, or metal atom) and oxygen (or fluorine) are both important for inducing the allosteric transition of GroEL, leading to the high selectivity of GroEL for ATP about ligand adenine nucleotides, which function as the preferred allosteric ligand.     

Hsp90 and co‐chaperones twist the functions of diverse client proteins

Hsp90 molecular chaperones are required for the stability and activity of a diverse range of client proteins that have critical roles in signal transduction, cellular trafficking, chromatin remodeling, cell growth, differentiation, and reproduction. Mammalian cells contain three types of Hsp90s: cytosolic Hsp90, mitochondrial Trap‐1, and Grp94 of the endoplasmic reticulum. Each of the Hsp90s, as well as the bacterial homolog, HtpG, hydrolyze ATP and undergo similar conformational changes. Unlike the other forms of Hsp90, cytosolic Hsp90 function is dependent on a battery of co‐chaperone proteins that regulate the ATPase activity of Hsp90 or direct Hsp90 to interact with specific client proteins. This review will summarize what is known about Hsp90's ability to mediate the folding and activation of diverse client proteins that contribute to human diseases, such as cancer and fungal and viral infections. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 93: 211–217, 2010. This article was originally published online as an accepted preprint. The “Published Online” date corresponds to the preprint version. You can request a copy of the preprint by emailing the Biopolymers editorial office at biopolymers@wiley.com     

GroEL Ring Separation and Exchange in the Chaperonin Reaction

1. Download high-res image (201KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Role of connecting loop I in catalysis and allosteric regulation of human glucokinase

Glucokinase (GCK, hexokinase IV) is a monomeric enzyme with a single glucose binding site that displays steady‐state kinetic cooperativity, a functional characteristic that affords allosteric regulation of GCK activity. Structural evidence suggests that connecting loop I, comprised of residues 47–71, facilitates cooperativity by dictating the rate and scope of motions between the large and small domains of GCK. Here we investigate the impact of varying the length and amino acid sequence of connecting loop I upon GCK cooperativity. We find that sequential, single amino acid deletions from the C‐terminus of connecting loop I cause systematic decreases in cooperativity. Deleting up to two loop residues leaves the k_cat value unchanged; however, removing three or more residues reduces k_cat by 1000‐fold. In contrast, the glucose K_0.5 and K_D values are unaffected by shortening the connecting loop by up to six residues. Substituting alanine or glycine for proline‐66, which adopts a cis conformation in some GCK crystal structures, does not alter cooperativity, indicating that cis/trans isomerization of this loop residue does not govern slow conformational reorganizations linked to hysteresis. Replacing connecting loop I with the corresponding loop sequence from the catalytic domain of the noncooperative isozyme human hexokinase I (HK‐I) eliminates cooperativity without impacting the k_cat and glucose K_0.5 values. Our results indicate that catalytic turnover requires a minimal length of connecting loop I, whereas the loop has little impact upon the binding affinity of GCK for glucose. We propose a model in which the primary structure of connecting loop I affects cooperativity by influencing conformational dynamics, without altering the equilibrium distribution of GCK conformations.     

GroEL的耗能分子伴侣机制

双环结构Gro EL及其辅分子伴侣Gro ES是目前研究得最深入的分子伴侣.然而,Gro EL/Gro ES帮助蛋白质折叠的一些关键理化机制,尤其是水解ATP,Gro EL发生构象改变,能否主动调节蛋白质错误折叠中间体的构象,以促进错误折叠中间体的复性,仍然存在争议.结合本研究组近年的工作,作者着力介绍Gro EL促进蛋白质折叠的主动解折叠机制.