Study on noncovalent complexes of cytotoxic protoberberine alkaloids with double-stranded DNA by using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

The noncovalent complexes of four cytotoxic protoberberine alkaloids that is, berberine, palmatine, jatrorrhizine, and coptisine with double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides d(AAGAATTCTT)(2) were investigated by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. These four active components from Chinese herbal medicines showed both 1:1 and 1:2 binding stoichiometries, independent on the alkaloid-to-DNA ratios. Binding affinities in the order of palmatine> or =jatrorrhizine>coptisine>berberine with d(AAGAATTCTT)(2) were obtained. Additionally, the preliminary results indicated that berberine had some sequence selectivities.     

Fos-Jun heterodimers and Jun homodimers bend DNA in opposite orientations: implications for transcription factor cooperativity

Association of Fos and Jun with the AP-1 site results in a conformational change in the basic amino acid regions that constitute the DNA-binding domain. We show that Fos and Jun induce a corresponding alteration in the conformation of the DNA helix. Circular permutation analysis indicated that both Fos-Jun heterodimers and Jun homodimers induce flexure at the AP-1 site. Phasing analysis demonstrated that Fos-Jun heterodimers and Jun homodimers induce DNA bends that are directed in opposite orientations. Fos-Jun heterodimers bend DNA toward the major groove, whereas Jun homodimers bend DNA toward the minor groove. Fos and Jun peptides encompassing the dimerization and DNA-binding domains bend DNA in the same orientations as the full-length proteins. However, additional regions of both proteins influence the magnitude of the DNA bend angle. Thus, despite the amino acid sequence similarity in the basic region Fos-Jun heterodimers and Jun homodimers form topologically distinct DNA-protein complexes.     

Spectrometric studies of cytotoxic protoberberine alkaloids binding to double-stranded DNA

The noncovalent complexes of five cytotoxic protoberberine alkaloids, that is, berberine, palmatine, jatrorrhizine, coptisine, and berberrubine with several double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides were systematically investigated by using electrospray ionization mass (ESI-MS) and fluorescence spectrometric methods, with the aim of establishing the structure-activity relationships. ESI-MS spectrometric studies indicated that these five alkaloids showed both 1:1 and 1:2 binding stoichiometries with d(AAGAATTCTT)(2), d(AAGGATCCTT)(2), and d(AAGCATGCTT)(2). Their relative binding affinities toward these three double-stranded DNA were semi-quantitatively evaluated by measuring the ratios of the complex signals ([ds+alkaloid-5H](4-)+[ds+2alkaloid-6H](4-)) to those of the duplexes ([ds-4H](4-)) and also by ESI-MS competitive binding experiments. These experiments established the relative binding affinities of five protoberberine alkaloids in the order of palmatine>jatrorrhizine>coptisine>berberine>berberrubine with d(AAGAATTCTT)(2), palmatinecoptisine>jatrorrhizineberberine>berberrubine with d(AAGGATCCTT)(2) and palmatine>jatrorrhizinecoptisine>berberine>berberrubine with d(AAGCATGCTT)(2). Significantly, these alkaloids except berberrubine bound to d(AAGGATCCTT)(2) and d(AAGCATGCTT)(2) with the affinities comparable to Hoechst 33258, a typical DNA minor groove binder. The relative binding preferences of berberine, palmatine, and coptisine with these three double-stranded DNA were further quantitatively assessed by their association constants obtained from fluorescence titration experiments. The values revealed the order of relative binding affinities as berberine>coptisine>palmatine with d(AAGAATTCTT)(2) and coptisine>berberine>palmatine with d(AAGGATCCTT)(2) and d(AAGCATGCTT)(2). These results were not in full agreement with those obtained from ESI-MS experiments, maybe due to the different measuring solution conditions. The results from ESI-MS and fluorescence titration experiments indicated that the sequence selectivities of these five alkaloids were not significant and remarkable AT- or GC-rich DNA binding preferences were not obtained, in contrast to the report that berberine binds preferentially to AT-rich DNA. To provide further insight into the sequence selectivities, the association constants of berberine with d(AAGATATCTT)(2), 5'-AAGTAATCTT-3'/5'-AAGATTACTT-3', d(AAGGGCCCTT)(2), d(AAGGCGCCTT)(2), and 5'-AAGGCCGCTT-3'/5'-AAGCGGCCTT-3', that is double helical DNA from AT-rich to GC-rich sequences, were further measured by fluorescence titration methods. No significant differences in their association constants were observed, suggesting that berberine showed no remarkable sequence selectivities.     

DNA-binding affinities and sequence specificities of protoberberine alkaloids and their demethylated derivatives: a comparative study

Berberrubine (1a), jatrorubine (2a), and palmatrubine (3a) have been chemically prepared by partial demethylation of berberine (1), jatrorrhizine (2), and palmatine (3), respectively. Their interactions with calf thymus (CT) DNA, poly(dA-dT)poly(dA-dT), poly(dG-dC)poly(dG-dC), and eight AT-rich 12-mer double-stranded DNAs have been investigated by means of competitive ethidium bromide (EB) displacement experiments. The results showed that DNA-binding affinities of these protoberberine alkaloids have been significantly improved by partial demethylation, and that all of these alkaloids have the preferable binding affinities with AT-rich DNA. Especially, the sequence specificities of DNA-binding of demethylated derivatives 1a, 2a, and 3a had changed to a certain extent when compared with the parent alkaloids 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The binding mode of these alkaloids was further confirmed by UV spectroscopic titration experiments. All the compounds bind to double-stranded DNA most probably via an intercalating mode.     

Non-covalent complexes between bis-beta-carbolines and double-stranded DNA: A study by electrospray ionization FT-ICR mass spectrometry (I)

The non-covalent complexes of five bis-beta-carbolines alkaloids with three different double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides d(GCGCGATCGCGC)(2), d(GCGCAATTGCGC)(2), and d(GCGAAATTTCGC)(2) were investigated by electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. These five antitumor compounds all showed DNA-binding abilities. Binding affinities in the order of 2>3, 4>5, and 1 with double-stranded DNA were obtained, which mean that the length of the linkage chain between two beta-carbolines has a remarkable effect on the formation of the non-covalent complexes. Additionally, the preliminary results indicated that bis-beta-carbolines had no notable sequence selectivities.     

Substitution of basic amino acids in the basic region stabilizes DNA binding by E12 homodimers.

The E2A gene encodes two alternatively spliced products, E12 and E47. The two proteins differ in their basic helix-loop-helix motifs (bHLH), responsible for DNA binding and dimerization. Although both E12 and E47 can bind to DNA as heterodimers with tissue-specific bHLH proteins, E12 binds to DNA poorly as homodimers. An inhibitory domain in E12 has previously been found to prevent E12 homodimers from binding to DNA. By measuring the dissociation rates using filter binding and electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we have shown here that the inhibitory domain interferes with DNA binding by destabilizing the DNA-protein complexes. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that substitution of basic amino acids (not other amino acids) in the DNA-binding domain of E12 can increase the intrinsic DNA-binding activity of E12 and stabilize the binding complexes, thus alleviating the repression from the inhibitory domain. This ability of basic amino acids to stabilize DNA-binding complexes may be of biological significance in the case of myogenic bHLH proteins, which all possess two more basic amino acids in their DNA binding domain than E12. To function as heterodimers with E12, the myogenic bHLH proteins may need stronger DNA binding domains.     

Differential binding of quadruplex structures of muscle-specific genes regulatory sequences by MyoD, MRF4 and myogenin

Four myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs); MyoD, Myf-5, MRF4 and Myogenin direct muscle tissue differentiation. Heterodimers of MRFs with E-proteins activate muscle-specific gene expression by binding to E-box motifs d(CANNTG) in their promoters or enhancers. We showed previously that in contrast to the favored binding of E-box by MyoD-E47 heterodimers, homodimeric MyoD associated preferentially with quadruplex structures of regulatory sequences of muscle-specific genes. To inquire whether other MRFs shared the DNA binding preferences of MyoD, the DNA affinities of hetero- and homo-dimeric MyoD, MRF4 and Myogenin were compared. Similarly to MyoD, heterodimers with E47 of MRF4 or Myogenin bound E-box more tightly than quadruplex DNA. However, unlike homodimeric MyoD or MRF4, Myogenin homodimers associated weakly and nonpreferentially with quadruplex DNA. By reciprocally switching basic regions between MyoD and Myogenin we demonstrated dominance of MyoD in determining the quadruplex DNA-binding affinity. Thus, Myogenin with an implanted MyoD basic region bound quadruplex DNA nearly as tightly as MyoD. However, a grafted Myogenin basic region did not diminish the high affinity of homodimeric MyoD for quadruplex DNA. We speculate that the dissimilar interaction of MyoD and Myogenin with tetrahelical domains in muscle gene promoters may differently regulate their myogenic activities.     

Mechanisms of Ricin Toxin Neutralization Revealed through Engineered Homodimeric and Heterodimeric Camelid Antibodies

Novel antibody constructs consisting of two or more different camelid heavy-chain only antibodies (VHHs) joined via peptide linkers have proven to have potent toxin-neutralizing activity in vivo against Shiga, botulinum, Clostridium difficile, anthrax, and ricin toxins. However, the mechanisms by which these so-called bispecific VHH heterodimers promote toxin neutralization remain poorly understood. In the current study we produced a new collection of ricin-specific VHH heterodimers, as well as VHH homodimers, and characterized them for their ability neutralize ricin in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrate that the VHH heterodimers, but not homodimers were able to completely protect mice against ricin challenge, even though the two classes of antibodies (heterodimers and homodimers) had virtually identical affinities for ricin holotoxin and similar IC₅₀ values in a Vero cell cytotoxicity assay. The VHH heterodimers did differ from the homodimers in their ability to promote toxin aggregation in solution, as revealed through analytical ultracentrifugation. Moreover, the VHH heterodimers that were most effective at promoting ricin aggregation in solution were also the most effective at blocking ricin attachment to cell surfaces. Collectively, these data suggest that heterodimeric VHH-based neutralizing agents may function through the formation of antibody-toxin complexes that are impaired in their ability to access host cell receptors.     

Pharmacological characterization of putative beta1-beta2-adrenergic receptor heterodimers

In the last few years, significant experimental evidence has accumulated showing that many G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are structurally and perhaps functionally homodimers. Recently, a number of studies have demonstrated that many GPCRs, notably GABA(B), somatostatin, and delta and kappa opioid receptors form heterodimers, as well. Based on these observations, we undertook a pharmacological and functional analysis of HEK 293 cells transiently transfected with the beta1AR or beta2AR or with both subtypes together. High-affinity binding for subtype-specific ligands (betaxolol and xamoterol for the beta1AR, and ICI 118,551 and procaterol for the beta2AR) was detected in cells expressing the cognate receptors alone with values similar to those reported in the literature. However, a significant portion of these high-affinity interactions were lost when both receptors were expressed together while nonspecific ligands (propranolol and isoproterenol) retained their normal affinities. When competition assays were performed with each subtype-specific ligand in the presence of a constant concentration of the other subtype-specific ligand, the high-affinity binding site was rescued, suggesting that the two receptor subtypes were interacting in a fashion consistent with positive cooperativity. Our data suggest that the beta1AR and beta2AR can form heterodimers and that these receptors have altered pharmacological properties from the receptor homodimers.     

Structural basis of diversity and homodimerization specificity of zinc-finger-associated domains in Drosophila

In arthropods, zinc finger-associated domains (ZADs) are found at the N-termini of many DNA-binding proteins with tandem arrays of Cys2-His2 zinc fingers (ZAD-C2H2 proteins). ZAD-C2H2 proteins undergo fast evolutionary lineage-specific expansion and functional diversification. Here, we show that all ZADs from Drosophila melanogaster form homodimers, but only certain ZADs with high homology can also heterodimerize. CG2712, for example, is unable to heterodimerize with its paralog, the previously characterized insulator protein Zw5, with which it shares 46% homology. We obtained a crystal structure of CG2712 protein''s ZAD domain that, in spite of a low sequence homology, has similar spatial organization with the only known ZAD structure (from Grauzone protein). Steric clashes prevented the formation of heterodimers between Grauzone and CG2712 ZADs. Using detailed structural analysis, site-directed mutagenesis, and molecular dynamics simulations, we demonstrated that rapid evolutionary acquisition of interaction specificity was mediated by the more energy-favorable formation of homodimers in comparison to heterodimers, and that this specificity was achieved by multiple amino acid substitutions resulting in the formation or breaking of stabilizing interactions. We speculate that specific homodimerization of ZAD-C2H2 proteins is important for their architectural role in genome organization.     

Sustained Ca2+ signaling and delayed internalization associated with endothelin receptor heterodimers linked through a PDZ finger

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including endothelin receptor A (ETA) and B (ETB), may form dimers or higher-order oligomers that profoundly influence signaling. Here we examined a PDZ finger motif within the C-terminus of ETA and its role in heterodimerization with ETB, and in homodimerization with itself, when expressed in HEK293 cells. Receptor dimerization was monitored by (i) fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) (FRET donor) and tetracysteine/FlAsH (FRET acceptor) fused to the C-termini of ET receptors, and (ii) coimmunoprecipitation of ET receptors after mild detergent solubilization. Mutations in a PDZ finger motif at threonine403/serine404 eliminated FRET and reduced coimmunoprecipitation of heterodimers and homodimers. Functional consequences were evaluated by measuring mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ and internalization of receptors in response to a 10 nmol/L ET-1 challenge. PDZ mutations converted a sustained Ca2+ signal mediated by ETA:ETB heterodimers into a transient response, similar to that observed for homodimers or monomers. Heterodimers containing PDZ mutations were seen to internalize in a similar time domain (approximately 5 min) to the transient Ca2+ elevation and with similar kinetics to internalization of ETA homodimers or monomers. Without the PDZ mutations, heterodimers did not internalize over 15 min, suggesting the intriguing possibility that sustained Ca2+ signaling was a consequence (at least in part) of delayed internalization. The results are consistent with structural models of ETA-receptor dimerization that place threonine403/serine404 of the PDZ finger motif at the interaction interface between heterodimers and homodimers. Sustained Ca2+ signaling and delayed endocytosis of ETA:ETB heterodimers argues strongly for a unique dimer interface that impacts transmembrane signaling and internalization.     

Platelet-derived growth factor: three isoforms and two receptor types

Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) is a dimeric molecule that occurs as homodimers or heterodimers of related polypeptide chains. Recent data indicate that the isoforms have different functional activities because they bind with different affinities to two distinct receptor types. The activation of at least one of the PDGF receptor types involves receptor dimerization. Furthermore, there are indications that cells respond to PDGF in vivo only when they have been previously stimulated to express the corresponding receptor.     

Evolutionary and structural analyses of heterodimeric proteins composed of subunits with same fold

Heterodimeric proteins with homologous subunits of same fold are involved in various biological processes. The objective of this study is to understand the evolution of structural and functional features of such heterodimers. Using a non‐redundant dataset of 70 such heterodimers of known 3D structure and an independent dataset of 173 heterodimers from yeast, we note that the mean sequence identity between interacting homologous subunits is only 23–24% suggesting that, generally, highly diverged paralogues assemble to form such a heterodimer. We also note that the functional roles of interacting subunits/domains are generally quite different. This suggests that, though the interacting subunits/domains are homologous, the high evolutionary divergence characterize their high functional divergence which contributes to a gross function for the heterodimer considered as a whole. The inverse relationship between sequence identity and RMSD of interacting homologues in heterodimers is not followed. We also addressed the question of formation of homodimers of the subunits of heterodimers by generating models of fictitious homodimers on the basis of the 3D structures of the heterodimers. Interaction energies associated with these homodimers suggests that, in overwhelming majority of the cases, such homodimers are unlikely to be stable. Majority of the homologues of heterodimers of known structures form heterodimers (51.8%) and a small proportion (14.6%) form homodimers. Comparison of 3D structures of heterodimers with homologous homodimers suggests that interfacial nature of residues is not well conserved. In over 90% of the cases we note that the interacting subunits of heterodimers are co‐localized in the cell. Proteins 2015; 83:1766–1786. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Quantitative analysis of muscarinic acetylcholine receptor homo- and heterodimerization in live cells: regulation of receptor down-regulation by heterodimerization

Although previous pharmacological and biochemical data support the notion that muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) form homo- and heterodimers, the existence of mAChR oligomers in live cells is still a matter of controversy. Here we used bioluminescence resonance energy transfer to demonstrate that M(1), M(2), and M(3) mAChR can form constitutive homo- and heterodimers in living HEK 293 cells. Quantitative bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis has revealed that the cell receptor population in cells expressing a single subtype of M(1), M(2), or M(3) mAChR is predominantly composed of high affinity homodimers. Saturation curve analysis of cells expressing two receptor subtypes demonstrates the existence of high affinity M(1)/M(2), M(2)/M(3), and M(1)/M(3) mAChR heterodimers, although the relative affinity values were slightly lower than those for mAChR homodimers. Short term agonist treatment did not modify the oligomeric status of homo- and heterodimers. When expressed in JEG-3 cells, the M(2) receptor exhibits much higher susceptibility than the M(3) receptor to agonist-induced down-regulation. Coexpression of M(3) mAChR with increasing amounts of the M(2) subtype in JEG-3 cells resulted in an increased agonist-induced down-regulation of M(3), suggesting a novel role of heterodimerization in the mechanism of mAChR long term regulation.