Effect of microsphere binding site density on the apparent affinity of an interaction partner.

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometric microsphere-based binding assays can be used to measure molecular interactions with high sensitivity. We have used multiplexed microsphere technology to explore the effect that binding site density has on the apparent affinity of a soluble interaction partner. METHODS: The interaction of a nuclear receptor, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand binding domain (PPARgamma LBD), with a synthetic peptide derived from a nuclear receptor coactivator protein, PPARgamma coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1alpha), is the interacting system being studied. The density of this peptide coupled to fluorescently unique microsphere populations is varied by co-incubating the biotinylated peptide and avidin-coated microsphere populations with increasing the amounts of free D-biotin. The discrete-density peptide-coupled microsphere populations are combined to conduct a multiplexed binding experiment with Alexa 532-labeled PPARgamma LBD, in the absence or presence of a small molecule ligand. RESULTS: As the immobilized binding site density of PGC-1alpha peptide on fluorescent microspheres is increased the measured apparent affinity for PPARgamma LBD is increased. CONCLUSIONS: The density of binding sites immobilized to a surface has a pronounced effect on the apparent affinity for soluble binding partners. By controlling and varying the binding site density it is possible to increase the sensitivity of an interaction assay. In multiplexed assay formats it should be possible to normalize intrinsically unequal binding interactions by individually optimizing the binding site density of the immobilized interaction partner. However, to quantitatively measure intrinsic affinities of molecular interactions, low binding site densities are required and multivalent reagents must be avoided.     

Rational discovery of a novel interface for a coactivator in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma: theoretical implications of impairment in type 2 diabetes mellitus

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) is important to adipocyte differentiation and glucose homeostasis, and mutations in the gene have been observed in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mutated residues, V290 and P467, bind to neither ligands nor a coactivator peptide in the reported crystal structures of the PPARgamma ligand binding domain. To understand the mechanism of type 2 diabetes mellitus caused by germline mutations in the PPARgamma ligand-binding domain, theoretical models of the PPARgamma-ligand-coactivator complex were built at an atomic resolution. In the models, the secondary coactivator peptide was docked next to the conventional coactivator peptide, which both contain the LXXLL motif. The secondary interface in PPARgamma for the secondary coactivator peptide has not been demonstrated by experiments. Binding energy calculations of the complex, considering the solvent effect, revealed that the secondary coactivator peptide, derived from nuclear receptor box 1 of steroid receptor coactivator 1, can be favorably bound to the secondary interface. The secondary coactivator peptide forms hydrogen bonds and a hydrophobic core with PPARgamma and the primary coactivator peptide. Next, we applied mutations to PPARgamma in silico and found that the V290M mutation, observed in type 2 diabetes mellitus, adversely affected the binding of the secondary peptide. Thus, our model provides structural insight into the impairment of PPARgamma function in type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

ERβ Binds N-CoR in the Presence of Estrogens via an LXXLL-like Motif in the N-CoR C-terminus

Nuclear receptors (NRs) usually bind the corepressors N-CoR and SMRT in the absence of ligand or in the presence of antagonists. Agonist binding leads to corepressor release and recruitment of coactivators. Here, we report that estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta) binds N-CoR and SMRT in the presence of agonists, but not antagonists, in vitro and in vivo. This ligand preference differs from that of ERalpha interactions with corepressors, which are inhibited by estradiol, and resembles that of ERbeta interactions with coactivators. ERbeta /N-CoR interactions involve ERbeta AF-2, which also mediates coactivator recognition. Moreover, ERbeta recognizes a sequence (PLTIRML) in the N-CoR C-terminus that resembles coactivator LXXLL motifs. Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity specifically potentiates ERbeta LBD activity, suggesting that corepressors restrict the activity of AF-2. We conclude that the ER isoforms show completely distinct modes of interaction with a physiologically important corepressor and discuss our results in terms of ER isoform specificity in vivo.     

Androgen receptor ligand-binding domain interaction and nuclear receptor specificity of FXXLF and LXXLL motifs as determined by L/F swapping

The androgen receptor (AR) ligand-binding domain (LBD) binds FXXLF motifs, present in the AR N-terminal domain and AR-specific cofactors, and some LXXLL motifs of nuclear receptor coactivators. We demonstrated that in the context of the AR FXXLF motif many different amino acid residues at positions +2 and +3 are compatible with strong AR LBD interaction, although a preference for E at +2 and K or R at +3 was found. Pairwise systematic analysis of F/L swaps at +1 and +5 in FXXLF and LXXLL motifs showed: 1) F to L substitutions in natural FXXLF motifs abolished AR LBD interaction; 2) binding of interacting LXXLL motifs was unchanged or increased upon L to F substitutions; 3) certain noninteracting LXXLL motifs became strongly AR-interacting FXXLF motifs; whereas 4) other nonbinders remained unaffected by L to F substitutions. All FXXLF motifs, but not the corresponding LXXLL motifs, displayed a strong preference for AR LBD. Progesterone receptor LBD interacted with some FXXLF motifs, albeit always less efficiently than corresponding LXXLL motifs. AR LBD interaction of most FXXLF and LXXLL peptides depended on classical charge clamp residue K720, whereas E897 was less important. Other charged residues lining the AR coactivator-binding groove, K717 and R726, modulated optimal peptide binding. Interestingly, these four charged residues affected binding of individual peptides independent of an F or L at +1 and +5 in swap experiments. In conclusion, F residues determine strong and selective peptide interactions with AR. Sequences flanking the core motif determine the specific mode of FXXLF and LXXLL interactions.     

The ligand-dependent interaction of mineralocorticoid receptor with coactivator and corepressor peptides suggests multiple activation mechanisms

We investigated the coregulator (coactivator and corepressor) interactions with the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) that lead to activation and inhibition of the receptor in the presence of agonist and/or antagonist. Our results indicate that MR ligand binding domain (LBD) interacts strongly with only a few specific coactivator peptides in the presence of the agonist aldosterone and that these interactions are blocked by the antagonist eplerenone. We also discovered that cortisol, the preferred physiological ligand for the glucocorticoid receptor in humans, is a partial MR agonist/antagonist, providing a possible molecular explanation of the tissue-selective effects of glucocorticoids on MR. However, when we examined the coactivator and corepressor peptide interactions in the presence of cortisol, we found that MR bound with cortisol or aldosterone interacted with the same set of peptides. Thus, the partial agonism shown by cortisol is unlikely to be the result of differential interaction with known coactivators and corepressors. On the other hand, we have identified coactivator binding groove mutations that are critical for cortisol activation but not for aldosterone activation, suggesting that the two steroids induce different MR LBD conformations. In addition, we also show that cortisol becomes full agonist when S810L mutation is introduced in the LBD of MR. Interestingly, MR antagonists, such as eplerenone and progesterone, become partial agonist/antagonist of S810L but are still able to recruit LXXLL peptides to the mutant receptor. Together, these findings suggest a model to explain the MR activation by various ligands.     

Interaction of transcriptional intermediary factor 2 nuclear receptor box peptides with the coactivator binding site of estrogen receptor alpha

The activation function 2/ligand-dependent interaction between nuclear receptors and their coregulators is mediated by a short consensus motif, the so-called nuclear receptor (NR) box. Nuclear receptors exhibit distinct preferences for such motifs depending both on the bound ligand and on the NR box sequence. To better understand the structural basis of motif recognition, we characterized the interaction between estrogen receptor alpha and the NR box regions of the p160 coactivator TIF2. We have determined the crystal structures of complexes between the ligand-binding domain of estrogen receptor alpha and 12-mer peptides from the Box B2 and Box B3 regions of TIF2. Surprisingly, the Box B3 module displays an unexpected binding mode that is distinct from the canonical LXXLL interaction observed in other ligand-binding domain/NR box crystal structures. The peptide is shifted along the coactivator binding site in such a way that the interaction motif becomes LXXYL rather than the classical LXXLL. However, analysis of the binding properties of wild type NR box peptides, as well as mutant peptides designed to probe the Box B3 orientation, suggests that the Box B3 peptide primarily adopts the "classical" LXXLL orientation in solution. These results highlight the potential difficulties in interpretation of protein-protein interactions based on co-crystal structures using short peptide motifs.     

Development of a coactivator displacement assay for the orphan receptor estrogen-related receptor-gamma using time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer

The estrogen-related receptor-gamma (ERRgamma) is a constitutively active orphan receptor that belongs to the nuclear receptor superfamily and is most closely related to the estrogen receptors. Although its physiological ligand is unknown, ERRgamma has been shown to interact with synthetic estrogenic compounds such as 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT), tamoxifen, and diethylstilbestrol (DES). To assess how coregulator proteins interact with ERRgamma in response to ligand, an in vitro interaction methodology using time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) was developed using glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tagged ERRgamma ligand-binding domain (LBD), a terbium-labeled anti-GST antibody, a fluorescein-labeled peptide containing sequences derived from coregulator proteins, and various ligands. An initial screen of these coregulator peptides bearing the coactivator LXXLL motif, the corepressor LXXI/HIXXXI/L motif, or other interaction motifs from natural coactivator sequences or random phage display peptides indicated that the peptides PGC1alpha, D22, and SRC1-4, known as class III coregulators, interacted most strongly with ERRgamma in the absence of ligand. Given its assay window and biological relevance in energy metabolism and obesity, further studies were conducted with PGC1alpha. Fluorescein-labeled PGC1alpha peptide was displaced from the ERRgamma LBD in the presence of increasing concentrations of 4-OHT and tamoxifen, but DES was less effective in PGC1alpha displacement. The statistical parameter Z' factor that measures the robustness of the assay was greater than 0.8 for displacement of PGC1alpha from ERRgamma LBD in the presence of saturating 4-OHT over an assay incubation time of 1-6 h, indicating an excellent assay. These findings also suggest that binding of 4-OHT, tamoxifen, or DES to ERRgamma results in differential affinity of coregulators for ERRgamma due to unique ligand-induced conformations.     

Ligand and coactivator identity determines the requirement of the charge clamp for coactivation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma

The activation function 2 (AF-2)-dependent recruitment of coactivator is essential for gene activation by nuclear receptors. We show that the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) (NR1C3) coactivator-1 (PGC-1) requires both the intact AF-2 domain of PPARgamma and the LXXLL domain of PGC-1 for ligand-dependent and ligand-independent interaction and coactivation. Although the AF-2 domain of PPARgamma is absolutely required for PGC-1-mediated coactivation, this coactivator displayed a unique lack of requirement for the charge clamp of the ligand-binding domain of the receptor that is thought to be essential for LXXLL motif recognition. The mutation of a single serine residue adjacent to the core LXXLL motif of PGC-1 led to restoration of the typical charge clamp requirement. Thus, the unique structural features of the PGC-1 LXXLL motif appear to mediate an atypical mode of interaction with PPARgamma. Unexpectedly, we discovered that various ligands display variability in terms of their requirement for the charge clamp of PPARgamma for coactivation by PGC-1. This ligand-selective variable requirement for the charge clamp was coactivator-specific. Thus, distinct structural determinants, which may be unique for a particular ligand, are utilized by the receptor to recognize the coactivator. Our data suggest that even subtle differences in ligand structure are perceived by the receptor and translated into a unique display of the coactivator-binding surface of the ligand-binding domain, allowing for differential recognition of coactivators that may underlie distinct pharmacological profiles observed for ligands of a particular nuclear receptor.     

Structural basis for androgen receptor interdomain and coactivator interactions suggests a transition in nuclear receptor activation function dominance

The androgen receptor (AR) is required for male sex development and contributes to prostate cancer cell survival. In contrast to other nuclear receptors that bind the LXXLL motifs of coactivators, the AR ligand binding domain is preferentially engaged in an interdomain interaction with the AR FXXLF motif. Reported here are crystal structures of the ligand-activated AR ligand binding domain with and without bound FXXLF and LXXLL peptides. Key residues that establish motif binding specificity are identified through comparative structure-function and mutagenesis studies. A mechanism in prostate cancer is suggested by a functional AR mutation at a specificity-determining residue that recovers coactivator LXXLL motif binding. An activation function transition hypothesis is proposed in which an evolutionary decline in LXXLL motif binding parallels expansion and functional dominance of the NH(2)-terminal transactivation domain in the steroid receptor subfamily.