Attenuation of systemic morphine-induced analgesia by central administration of ghrelin and related peptides in mice

Ghrelin, an acylated 28-amino peptide secreted in the gastric endocrine cells, has been demonstrated to stimulate the release of growth hormone, increase food intake, and inhibit pro-inflammatory cascade, etc. Ghrelin mainly combines with its receptor (GHS-R1α) to play the role in physiological and pathological functions. It has been reported that ghrelin plays important roles in the control of pain through interaction with the opioid system in inflammatory pain and acute pain. However, very few studies show the effect of supraspinal ghrelin system on antinociception induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of morphine. In the present study, intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of ghrelin (0.1, 1, 10 and 100 nmol/L) produced inhibition of systemic morphine (6 mg/kg, i.p.) analgesia in the tail withdrawal test. Similarly, i.c.v. injection GHRP-6 and GHRP-2 which are the agonists of GHS-R1α, also decreased analgesia effect induced by morphine injected intraperitoneally in mice. Furthermore, these anti-opioid activities of ghrelin and related peptides were not blocked by pretreatment with the GHS-R1α selective antagonist [d-Lys³]-GHRP-6 (100 nmol/L, i.c.v.). These results demonstrated that central ghrelin and related peptides could inhibit the analgesia effect induced by intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of morphine. The anti-opioid effects of ghrelin and related peptides do not interact with GHS-R1a. These findings may pave the way for a new strategy on investigating the interaction between ghrelin system and opioids on pain modulation.     

Study on the molecular mechanism of antinociception induced by ghrelin in acute pain in mice

Ghrelin has been identified as the endogenous ligand for the GHS-R1α (growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1 alpha). Our previous experiments have indicated that ghrelin (i.c.v.) induces antinociceptive effects in acute pain in mice, and the effects were mediated through the central opioid receptors and GHS-R1α. However, which opioid receptor (OR) mediates the antinociceptive effects and the molecular mechanisms are also needed to be further explored. In the present study, the antinociceptive effects of ghrelin (i.c.v.) could be fully antagonized by δ-opioid receptor antagonist NTI. Furthermore, the mRNA and protein levels of δ-opioid peptide PENK and δ-opioid receptor OPRD were increased after i.c.v injection of ghrelin. Thus, it showed that the antinociception of ghrelin was correlated with the GHS-R1α and δ-opioid receptors. To explore which receptor was firstly activated by ghrelin, GHS-R1α antagonist [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 was co-injection (i.c.v.) with deltorphin II (selective δ-opioid receptor agonist). Finally, the antinociception induced by deltorphin II wasn’t blocked by the co-injection (i.c.v.) of [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6, indicating that the GHS-R1α isn’t on the backward position of δ-opioid receptor. The results suggested that i.c.v. injection of ghrelin initially activated the GHS-R1α, which in turn increased the release of endogenous PENK to activation of OPRD to produce antinociception.     

Antinociceptive effects of two deltorphins analogs in the tail-immersion test in rats

The antinociceptive effects of analogs of deltorphins: cyclo(Nδ,Nδ-carbonyl-d-Orn2, Orn4)deltorphin (DEL-6) and deltorphin II N-(ureidoethyl)amide (DK-4) after intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration were investigated in the tail-immersion test in rats. Morphine, the most commonly used μ-opioid receptors (MOR) agonist, was employed as a reference compound. The contribution of the MOR, δ-(DOR) and κ-opioid receptors (KOR) in antinociceptive effects of the deltorphins analogs was studies using selective antagonists of these receptors. The results indicated that DK-4 (5, 10 and 20 nmol) and DEL-6 (5, 10 and 20 nmol) were the most effective in alleviating thermal pain at the dose of 20 nmol. The antinociceptive potency of DEL-6 at the dose of 20 nmol was approximately equal but DK-4 at the dose of 20 nmol was less effective than morphine at the dose of 13 nmol. DOR antagonist – naltrindole (NTI, 5 nmol) very strongly and, to the lower extent MOR antagonist – β-funaltrexamine (β-FNA, 5 nmol), inhibited antinociceptive effect of DK-4 (20 nmol). In turn, β-FNA was more potent than NTI in inhibition of the antinociceptive effects of DEL-6. Co-administration of DEL-6 and morphine at doses of 5 nmol, which do not produce measurable antinociception, generated additive antinociceptive effect. Chronic intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of morphine (9 days) displayed a marked analgesic tolerance to the challenge dose of morphine and a slight cross-tolerance to challenge doses of DEL-6 and DK-4, given i.c.v. These findings indicate that the new deltorphin analogs recruit DOR and MOR to attenuate the nociceptive response to acute thermal stimuli.     

Food restriction,ghrelin, its antagonist and obestatin control expression of ghrelin and its receptor in chicken hypothalamus and ovary

The purpose of the present study was to identify the role of age, nutritional state and some metabolic hormones in control of avian hypothalamic and ovarian ghrelin/ghrelin receptor system. We examined the effect of food restriction, administration of ghrelin 1–18, ghrelin antagonistic analogue (D-Lys-3)-GHRP-6, obestatin and combinations of them on the expression of ghrelin and ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) in hypothalamus and ovary of old (23 months of age) and young (7 months of age) chickens. Expression of mRNAs for ghrelin and GHS-R1a in both hypothalamus and largest ovarian follicle was measured by RT-PCR. It was observed that food restriction could promote the expression of ghrelin and GHS-R1a in hypothalamus and ovary of the old chickens, but in the young chickens it reduced expression of ghrelin and did not affect expression of GHS-R1a in the ovary. Administration of ghrelin 1–18 did not affect hypothalamic or ovarian ghrelin mRNA, but significantly increased the expression of GHS-R1a in hypothalamus, but not in ovary. (D-Lys-3)-GHRP-6, significantly stimulated accumulation of ghrelin, but not GHS-R1a mRNA in hypothalamus or ghrelin or GHS-R1a in the ovary. Ghrelin 1–18 and (D-Lys-3)-GHRP-6, when given together, were able either to prevent or to induce effect of these hormones. Obestatin administration increased expression of ghrelin gene in the hypothalamus, but not expression of hypothalamic GHS-R1a, ovarian ghrelin and GHS-R1a. Furthermore, obestatin was able to modify effect of both ghrelin and fasting on hypothalamic and ovarian mRNA for ghrelin GHS-R1a. Our results (1) confirm the existence of ghrelin and its functional receptors GHS-R1a in the chicken hypothalamus and ovary (2) confirm the age-dependent control of ovarian ghrelin by feeding, (3) demonstrate, that nutritional status can influence the expression of both ghrelin and GHS-R1a in hypothalamus and in the ovary (3) demonstrates for the first time, that ghrelin can promote generation of its functional receptor in the hypothalamus, but not in the ovary, (4) show that ghrelin1–18 and (D-Lys-3)-GHRP-6 could not only be antagonists in the action on chicken hypothalamus and ovaries, but also independent regulators and even agonists, and (5) provide first evidence for action of obestatin on hypothalamic ghrelin and on the response of hypothalamic and ovarian ghrelin/GHS-R1a system to food restriction. These data indicate the involvement of both hypothalamic and ovarian ghrelin/GHS-R1 systems in mediating the effects of nutritional status, ghrelin and obestatin on reproductive processes.     

Impact of [d-Lys3]-GHRP-6 and feeding status on hypothalamic ghrelin-induced stress activation

Ghrelin administration directly into hypothalamic nuclei, including the arcuate nucleus (ArcN) and the paraventricular nucleus (PVN), alters the expression of stress-related behaviors. In the present study we investigated the effect of feeding status on the ability of ghrelin to induce stress and anxiogenesis. Adult male Sprague Dawley rats were implanted with guide cannula targeting either the ArcN or PVN. In the first experiment we confirmed that ArcN and PVN ghrelin treatment produced anxiety-like behavior as measured using the elevated plus maze (EPM) paradigm. Ghrelin was administered during the early dark cycle. Immediately after microinjections rats were placed in the EPM for 5 min. Both ArcN and PVN treatment reduced open arm exploration. The effect was attenuated by pretreatment with the ghrelin 1a receptor antagonist [d-Lys³]-GHRP-6. In a separate group of animals ghrelin was injected into either nucleus and rats were returned to their home cages for 60 min with free access to food. An additional group of rats was returned to home cages with no food access. After 60 min with or without food access all rats were tested in the EPM. Results indicated that food consumption just prior to EPM testing reversed the avoidance of the open arms of the EPM. In contrast, rats injected with ghrelin, placed in their home cage for 60 min without food, and subsequently tested in the EPM, exhibited an increased avoidance of the open arms, consistent with stress activation. Overall, our findings demonstrate that ghrelin 1a receptor blockade and feeding status appear to impact the ability of ArcN and PVN ghrelin to elicit stress and anxiety-like behaviors.     

Pharmacological characterization of the ghrelin receptor mediating its inhibitory action on inflammatory pain in rats

Recent research suggests a role for ghrelin in the modulation of inflammatory disorders. However, the type of ghrelin receptor (GHS-R) involved in both the anti-inflammatory and anti-hyperalgesic actions of ghrelin remains to be characterized. In this study, we examined whether the inhibitory effect of ghrelin in the development of hyperalgesia and edema induced by intraplantar carrageenan administration depends on an interaction with GHS-R1a. Both central (1 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) and peripheral (40 nmol/kg, i.p.) administration of the selective GHS-R1a agonist EP1572 had no effect on carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia measured by Randall–Selitto test and paw edema. Furthermore, pre-treatment with the selective GHS-R1a antagonist, d-lys³-GHRP-6 (3 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) failed to prevent the anti-hyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory effects exerted by central ghrelin administration (1 nmol/rat), thus indicating that the type 1a GHS-R is not involved in these peptide activities. Accordingly, both central (1 and 2 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) and peripheral (40 and 80 nmol/kg, i.p.) administration of desacyl-ghrelin (DAG), which did not bind GHS-R1a, induced a significant reduction of the hyperalgesic and edematous activities of carrageenan. In conclusion, we have shown for the first time that DAG shares with ghrelin an inhibitory role in the development of hyperalgesia, as well as the paw edema induced by carrageenan and that a ghrelin receptor different from type 1a is involved in the anti-inflammatory activities of the peptide.     

Synergistic analgesic effects between neuronostatin and morphine at the supraspinal level

Neuronostatin, a 13-amino acid peptide, is encoded in the somatostatin pro-hormone. I.c.v. administration of neuronostatin produces a significant antinociceptive effect in the mouse tail-flick test, which is mediated by endogenous opioid receptor. However, the direct functional interaction between morphine and neuronostatin has not been characterized. In the present study, effect of neuronostatin on morphine analgesia was investigated in the tail-flick test. Our findings showed that i.c.v. administration of neuronostatin (0.3 nmol/mouse i.c.v.) significantly enhanced the antinociceptive effect of morphine (2.5, 5 or 10 μg/kg) at the supraspinal level. Results of antagonism experiments suggested that the synergistic analgesia induced by morphine and neuronostatin was mediated by μ- and к-opioid receptors not δ-opioid receptor. In conclusion, there may be a cascade amplification phenomenon when morphine and neuronostatin were co-administered in acute pain model. The above results provide evidence for the potential use of neuronostatin in combination with morphine to control pain and addiction.     

Synthesis and antinociceptive properties of N-phenyl-N-(1-(2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl)azepane-4-yl)propionamide in the mouse tail-flick and hot-plate tests

The goals of this study, were to synthesize N-phenyl-N-(1-(2-(thiophen-2-yl)ethyl)azepane-4-yl)propionamide (1c) and determine its antinociceptive properties. The effect of clonidine on 1c antinociception and the involvement of opioid, α₂-adrenergic, and I₂ imidazoline receptors in 1c antinociception were studied. Also examined was the effect of an endothelin ET_A receptor antagonist on 1c antinociception. Synthesis of 1c was accomplished in two steps using modifications of previously reported methods. Antinociceptive (tail-flick and hot-plate) latencies were measured in male Swiss Webster mice treated with 1c; antagonists + 1c; clonidine + 1c; or antagonists + clonidine + 1c. Mice were pretreated with naloxone (opioid antagonist), yohimbine (α₂-adrenoceptor antagonist), idazoxan (α₂-adrenoceptor/I₂-imidazoline antagonist), BU224 (I₂-imidazoline antagonist) or BQ123 (endothelin ET_A receptor antagonist) to study the involvement of these receptors. Compound 1c produced a dose-dependent increase in antinociceptive latencies; ED₅₀ values were 0.15 mg/kg and 0.16 mg/kg, respectively, in the tail flick and hot plate tests. Naloxone, but not yohimbine, idazoxan or BU224, blocked 1c antinociception. Neither clonidine nor BQ123 potentiated 1c antinociception. Results demonstrate that 1c is 15-times more potent than morphine. The antinociceptive effect of 1c is mediated through opioid receptors. The α₂-adrenergic, I₂-imidazoline and endothelin ET_A receptors are not involved in 1c antinociception.     

Chronic central ghrelin infusion reduces blood pressure and heart rate despite increasing appetite and promoting weight gain in normotensive and hypertensive rats

Acute studies showed that ghrelin acts on the central nervous system (CNS) to reduce blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and sympathetic activity. However, the long-term CNS cardiovascular actions of ghrelin are still unclear. We tested whether chronic intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of ghrelin causes sustained reductions in BP, HR and whether it alters baroreceptor sensitivity (BRS) and autonomic input to the heart. A cannula was placed in the lateral ventricle of male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats for ICV infusions via osmotic minipump (0.5 μl/h). BP and HR were measured 24-h/day by telemetry. After 5 days of control measurements, ghrelin (0.21 nmol/h) or saline vehicle were infused ICV for 10 days followed by a 5-day post-treatment period. Chronic ICV ghrelin infusion increased food intake (22 ± 3 to 26 ± 1 g/day) leading to ∼50 g body weight gain. BP fell slightly during ghrelin infusion while HR decreased by ∼26 bpm. In control animals BP and HR increased modestly. ICV Ghrelin infusion caused a 50% reduction in sympathetic tone to the heart but did not alter BRS. We also tested if the depressor responses to ICV ghrelin infusion were enhanced in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) due to their high basal sympathetic tone. However, we observed similar BP and HR responses compared to normotensive rats. These results indicate that ghrelin, acting via direct actions on the CNS, has a sustained effect to lower HR and a modest impact to reduce BP in normotensive and hypertensive animals despite increasing appetite and body weight.     

Ghrelin suppresses Purkinje neuron P-type Ca2 + channels via growth hormone secretagogue type 1a receptor,the βγ subunits of Go-protein,and protein kinase A pathway

Although ghrelin receptors have been demonstrated to be widely expressed in the central nervous system and peripheral tissues of mammals, it is still unknown whether ghrelin functions in cerebellar Purkinje neurons. In this study, we identified a novel functional role for ghrelin in modulating P-type Ca^2 + channel (P-type channel) currents (I_Ba) as well as action-potential firing in rat Purkinje neurons. Our results show that ghrelin at 0.1 μM reversibly decreased I_Ba by ~ 32.3%. This effect was growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHS-R1a)-dependent and was associated with a hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage-dependence of inactivation. Intracellular application of GDP-β-S and pretreatment with pertussis toxin abolished the inhibitory effects of ghrelin. Dialysis of cells with the peptide QEHA (but not the scrambled peptide SKEE), and a selective antibody raised against the G-protein α_o subunit both blocked the ghrelin-induced response. Ghrelin markedly increased protein kinase A (PKA) activity, and intracellular application of PKI 5-24 as well as pretreatment of the cells with the PKA inhibitor KT-5720 abolished ghrelin-induced I_Ba decrease, while inhibition of PKC had no such effects. At the cellular level, ghrelin induced a significant increase in action-potential firing, and blockade of GHS-R1a by BIM-28163 abolished the ghrelin-induced hyperexcitability. In summary, these results suggest that ghrelin markedly decreases I_Ba via the activation of GHS-R1a, which is coupled sequentially to the activities of G_o-protein βγ subunits and the downstream PKA pathway. This could contribute to its physiological functions, including the spontaneous firing of action potentials in cerebellar Purkinje neurons.     

The antinociceptive effect of acetylsalicylic acid is differently affected by a CB1 agonist or antagonist and involves the serotonergic system in rats

AimsCombinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and cannabinoids are promising because of their potential synergistic effects in analgesia, resulting in a reduction in dosage and minimizing adverse reactions. The analgesic effect of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), probably due to a central mechanism, also implicates changes in the central monoaminergic system. Therefore, we decided to evaluate the antinociceptive interaction between the CB₁ receptor agonist, HU210, and ASA in tests involving central pain in rats as well as the implication of the central serotonergic system thereon.Main methodsThe selective CB₁ antagonist SR141716A and the potent cannabinoid agonist HU210 were evaluated alone and in combination with ASA in both algesimetric tests (hot-plate and formalin tests) and for 5-HT activity and 5-HT₂ receptor density and affinity.Key findingsASA or HU210 alone showed a dose-dependent effect in both tests. HU210, at an inactive dose, significantly increased the antinociceptive effect of the sub-active dose of ASA. SR141716A (1.5 mg/kg i.p.) was ineffective per se and failed to modify antinociception induced by the HU210 plus ASA combination in either test. HU210 plus ASA significantly decreased the 5-HIAA/5-HT ratio and the 5-HT₂ receptor density in the frontal cortex, changes not antagonized by SR141716A.SignificanceThe present study provides evidence that mutual potentiation of the antinociceptive effects of HU210 and ASA may, at least partly, depend on serotonergic mechanisms, with an indirect participation of cannabinodiergic mechanism. In conclusion, combinations of low doses of cannabinoids and NSAIDs may be of interest from the therapeutic point of view.     

The ghrelin activating enzyme ghrelin-O-acyltransferase (GOAT) is present in human plasma and expressed dependent on body mass index

Ghrelin is the only known peripherally produced and centrally acting peptide hormone stimulating food intake. The acylation of ghrelin is essential for binding to its receptor. Recently, the ghrelin activating enzyme ghrelin-O-acyltransferase (GOAT) was identified in mice, rats and humans. In addition to gastric mucosal expression, GOAT was also detected in the circulation of rodents and its expression was dependent on metabolic status. We investigated whether GOAT is also present in human plasma and whether expression levels are affected under different conditions of body weight. Normal weight, anorexic and obese subjects with body mass index (BMI) 30–40, 40–50 and >50 were recruited (n = 9/group). In overnight fasted subjects GOAT protein expression was assessed by Western blot and ghrelin measured by ELISA. GOAT protein was detectable in human plasma. Anorexic patients showed reduced GOAT protein levels (−42%, p < 0.01) whereas obese patients with BMI > 50 had increased concentrations (+34%) compared to normal weight controls. Ghrelin levels were higher in anorexic patients compared to all other groups (+62–78%, p < 0.001). Plasma GOAT protein expression showed a positive correlation with BMI (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) and a negative correlation with ghrelin (r = −0.60, p < 0.001). Summarized, GOAT is also present in human plasma and GOAT protein levels depend on the metabolic environment with decreased levels in anorexic and increased levels in morbidly obese patients. These data may indicate that GOAT counteracts the adaptive changes of ghrelin observed under these conditions and ultimately contributes to the development or maintenance of anorexia and obesity as it is the only enzyme acylating ghrelin.     

Serum ghrelin and prediction of metabolic parameters in over 20-year follow-up

Ghrelin is a peptide hormone from the stomach, with an ability to release growth-hormone from the pituitary. Numerous cross-sectional studies indicate that ghrelin also has a role in metabolic abnormalities, such as metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes, but evidence for long-term effect is scarce. We investigated, whether ghrelin concentration measured in middle age would predict the development or absence of metabolic disturbances subsequently. Study population consisted of 600 middle-aged persons, and the follow-up time was approximately 21 years. Plasma total ghrelin concentration was measured at the baseline, and divided to tertiles. Numerous anthropometric and other clinical measurements (including blood pressure), and laboratory test were made both at the baseline and at the follow-up. After the follow-up the prevalence of high systolic blood pressure according to MetS IDF-criteria was the lowest in the highest ghrelin tertile, and the highest in the first (p < 0.03). When only subjects free of hypertension medication at baseline were considered, subjects belonging to the highest ghrelin tertile developed less new hypertension and high blood pressure according to IDF-criteria as well as medication for it during the follow-up (p < 0.05). Although serum insulin levels were negatively correlated to ghrelin levels at both points in time (p < 0.001 at baseline and p = 0.003 at follow-up), plasma ghrelin concentration did not predict the development of abnormalities in glucose tolerance. The association with ghrelin and metabolic syndrome was lost during the follow-up. In conclusion, our results suggest high ghrelin to be protective against the development of hypertension in the long-term follow-up.     

Effect of ghrelin on chronic liver injury and fibrogenesis in male rats: Possible role of nitric oxide

Recent studies have revealed that ghrelin may be an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent in many organs, however its role in chronic liver injury (CLI) remains unclear. The role of nitric oxide (NO) in CLI is controversial as evidence suggests that NO is either a primary mediator of liver cell injury or exhibits a protective effect against injurious stimuli. Recent evidence demonstrated that the therapeutic potential for ghrelin was through eNOS activation and increase in NO production. However, its role on NO production in the liver has not been previously investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of ghrelin in treatment of CLI, and whether this action is mediated through NO. Forty male rats were divided into four groups: Group I: Control; Group II: chronic liver injury (CLI); Group III: CLI + Ghrelin; and Group IV: CLI + Ghrelin + l-NAME. Liver enzymes and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), were measured to assess hepatocellular injury. Liver tissue collagen content, malondialdehyde (MDA), gene expression of Bax, Bcl-2, and eNOS were assessed to determine the mechanism of ghrelin action. Results showed that ghrelin decreased serum liver enzymes and TNF-α levels. Ghrelin also reduced liver tissue collagen, MDA, and Bax gene expression, and increased Bcl-2 and eNOS gene expression. The effects on TNF-α, collagen, MDA, Bax, and eNOS were partially reversed in Group IV, suggesting that ghrelin's action could be through modulation of NO levels. Therefore, ghrelin's hepatoprotective effect is partially mediated by NO release.     

Involvement of delta and mu opioid receptors in the acute and sensitized locomotor action of cocaine in mice

Analogs of deltorphins, such as cyclo(Nδ, Nδ-carbonyl-d-Orn2, Orn4)deltorphin (DEL-6) and deltorphin II N-(ureidoethyl)amide (DK-4) are functional agonists predominantly for the delta opioid receptors (DOR) in the guinea-pig ileum and mouse vas deferens bioassays. The purpose of this study was to examine an influence of these peptides (5, 10 or 20 nmol, i.c.v.) on the acute cocaine-induced (10 mg/kg, i.p.) locomotor activity and the expression of sensitization to cocaine locomotor effect. Sensitization to locomotor effect of cocaine was developed by five injections of cocaine at the dose of 10 mg/kg, i.p. every 3 days. Our results indicated that DK-4 and DEL-6 differently affected the acute and sensitized cocaine locomotion. Co-administration of DEL-6 with cocaine enhanced acute cocaine locomotion only at the dose of 10 nmol, with minimal effects at the doses 5 and 20 nmol, whereas co-administration of DK-4 with cocaine enhanced acute cocaine-induced locomotion in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly to the acute effects, DEL-6 only at the dose of 10 nmol but DK-4 dose-dependently enhanced the expression of cocaine sensitization. Pre-treatment with DOR antagonist – naltrindole (5 nmol, i.c.v.) and mu opioid receptor (MOR) antagonist, β-funaltrexamine abolished the ability of both peptides to potentiate the effects of cocaine. Our study suggests that MOR and DOR are involved in the interactions between cocaine and both deltorphins analogs. A distinct dose–response effects of these peptides on cocaine locomotion probably arise from differential functional activation (targeting) of the DOR and MOR by both deltorphins analogs.     

In vitro and in vivo pharmacological characterization of the novel neuropeptide S receptor ligands QA1 and PI1

The pharmacological activity of the novel neuropeptide S (NPS) receptor (NPSR) ligands QA1 and PI1 was investigated. In vitro QA1 and PI1 were tested in calcium mobilization studies performed in HEK293 cells expressing the recombinant mouse (HEK293_mNPSR) and human (HEK293_hNPSRIle107 and HEK293_hNPSRAsn107) NPSR receptors. In vivo the compounds were studied in mouse righting reflex (RR) and locomotor activity (LA) tests. NPS caused a concentration dependent mobilization of intracellular calcium in the three cell lines with high potency (pEC₅₀ 8.73–9.14). In inhibition response curve and Schild protocol experiments the effects of NPS were antagonized by QA1 and PI1. QA1 displayed high potency (pK_B 9.60–9.82) behaving as a insurmountable antagonist. However in coinjection experiments QA1 produced a rightward swift of the concentration response curve to NPS without modifying its maximal effects; this suggests that QA1 is actually a slow dissociating competitive antagonist. PI1 displayed a competitive type of antagonism and lower values of potencies (pA₂ 7.74–8.45). In vivo in mice NPS (0.1 nmol, i.c.v.) elicited arousal promoting action in the RR assay and stimulant effects in the LA test. QA1 (30 mg kg⁻¹) was able to partially counteract the arousal promoting NPS effects, while PI1 was inactive in the RR test. In the LA test QA1 and PI1 only poorly blocked the NPS stimulant action. The present data demonstrated that QA1 and PI1 act as potent NPSR antagonists in vitro, however their usefulness for in vivo investigations in mice seems limited probably by pharmacokinetic reasons.     

In vivo characterization of the opioid antagonist nalmefene in mice

AimsThe current study assessed the in vivo antagonist properties of nalmefene using procedures previously used to characterize the opioid antagonists naloxone, naltrexone, 6β-naltrexol and nalbuphine.Main methodsICR mice were used to generate antagonist dose–response curves with intraperitoneal (i.p.) nalmefene against fixed A₉₀ doses of morphine in models of morphine-stimulated hyperlocomotion and antinociception. Additional dose–response curves for antagonist precipitated opioid withdrawal were run in mice treated acutely (100 mg/kg, s.c., ? 4 h) or chronically (75 mg pellet, s.c., ? 72 h) with morphine. Comparisons were made between antagonist potency and degree of precipitated withdrawal.Key findingsNalmefene produced dose- and time-related antagonism of morphine-induced increases in locomotor activity with a calculated ID₅₀ (and 95% confidence interval) of 0.014 (0.007–0.027) mg/kg. Nalmefene produced rapid reversal of morphine-induced locomotor activity (5.1 min for 50% reduction in morphine effect). A 0.32 mg/kg dose of nalmefene produced blockade of morphine-induced antinociception in the 55 °C tail-flick test that lasted approximately 2 h. Nalmefene was able to potently precipitate withdrawal in mice treated acutely or chronically with morphine.SignificanceThese results demonstrate that nalmefene is similar to naloxone and naltrexone with respect to its in vivo pharmacology in mice. Specifically, nalmefene produces potent antagonism of morphine agonist effects while precipitating severe withdrawal. The compound has a slower onset and longer duration of action compared to naloxone and naltrexone. The data allows for a more complete preclinical comparison of nalmefene against other opioid antagonists including the putative opioid neutral antagonist 6β-naltrexol.     

Involvement of orexin-2 receptors in the ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens in the antinociception induced by the lateral hypothalamus stimulation in rats

Orexin, which is mainly produced by orexin-expressing neurons in the lateral hypothalamus (LH), plays an important role in pain modulation. Both kinds of orexin-1 (Ox1) and orexin-2 (Ox2) receptors have been found at high density in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc). However, the quantity of Ox1 receptors in the VTA is more than that in the NAc. Additionally, it seems that the functional interaction between the LH, VTA and NAc implicates pain processing and modulation. In this study, we tried to examine the involvement of Ox2 receptors in the NAc and VTA using tail-flick test as an animal model of acute pain following microinjection of effective dose of carbachol (125 nmol/0.5 μl saline) into the LH. In this set of experiments, different doses of TCS OX2 29 as an Ox2 receptor antagonist were microinjected into the VTA (1, 7 and 20 nmol/0.3 μl DMSO) and the NAc (2, 10, 20 and 40 nmol/0.5 μl DMSO) 5 min prior to carbachol administration. Administration of TCS OX2 29 into the VTA and NAc dose-dependently blocked intra-LH carbachol-induced antinociception. However, the inhibitory effect of TCS OX2 29 as an Ox2 receptor antagonist was more potent in the VTA than that in the NAc. It seems that VTA orexinergic receptors are more effective on LH stimulation-induced antinociception and the modulation of pain descending inhibitory system originated from the LH than those of the same receptors in the nucleus accumbens in rats.     

Antinociceptive action of NOP and opioid receptor agonists in the mouse orofacial formalin test

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) modulates several biological functions, including pain transmission via selective activation of a specific receptor named NOP. The aim of this study was the investigation of the antinociceptive properties of NOP agonists and their interaction with opioids in the trigeminal territory. The orofacial formalin (OFF) test in mice was used to investigate the antinociceptive potential associated to the activation of NOP and opioid receptors. Mice subjected to OFF test displayed the typical biphasic nociceptive response and sensitivity to opioid and NSAID drugs. Mice knockout for the NOP gene displayed a robust pronociceptive phenotype. The NOP selective agonist Ro 65-6570 (0.1–1 mg kg⁻¹) and morphine (0.1–10 mg kg⁻¹) elicited dose dependent antinociceptive effects in the OFF with the alkaloid showing larger effects; the isobologram analysis of their actions demonstrated an additive type of interaction. The mixed NOP/opioid receptor agonist cebranopadol elicited potent (0.01–0.1 mg kg⁻¹) and robust antinociceptive effects. In the investigated dose range, all drugs did not modify the motor performance of the mice in the rotarod test. Collectively the results of this study demonstrated that selective NOP agonists and particularly mixed NOP/opioid agonists are worthy of development as innovative drugs to treat painful conditions of the trigeminal territory.