果蝇中顺式调控序列的进化

顺式调控序列(cis-regularory sequences)是与基因表达调控相关、能够被调控因子特异性识别和结合的非编码DNA序列。顺式调控序列可以通过增减所含转录因子结合位点的数目,重构转录调控网络,以精准调控基因的时空表达模式,从而调控动物的生理和形态表型。顺式调控假说认为顺式调控序列进化是自然界丰富的动物表型进化的主要遗传机制。本文首先简述了顺式调控序列的结构和功能,然后重点讨论了近年来顺式调控序列进化调控果蝇表型进化如刚毛表型进化、色素沉积表型进化和胚胎发育方面的研究进展,阐释了顺式调控序列进化是动物表型进化的主要遗传机制之一。最后本文展望了顺式调控序列未来研究方向,例如应用功能基因组研究、开展ENCODE计划等,为进化发育生物学中顺式调控序列的研究提供了参考。     

顺式调控元件对“头对头”基因对共表达的影响

转录调控是生物学过程中最关键的环节之一, 其中顺式调控元件在基因表达调控中发挥了极其重要的作用. 本研究通过对公共顺式调控元件的活性和行为进行分析, 从而推断“头对头”基因对共表达的原理. 用网络组分分析法估测顺式调控元件在不同条件下对基因启动子及其活性的影响. 结果揭示了生物系统如何利用这些调控元件调控“头对头”基因对的表达模式和整个转录调控系统.     

多个调控元件调控萜类合成途径基因表达提高β-胡萝卜素的生产

强启动子对于获得目标产物最大代谢流量来说并不一定是最优的;相比之下,使用多个具有不同强度的调控元件对基因表达进行调控更有可能获得最优的表达强度.为了对比使用多个调控元件和使用强启动子调控萜类合成途径基因表达对β-胡萝卜素生产的影响,并通过对关键基因的组合调控提高β-胡萝卜素的生产.文中使用6个强度差异很大的人工调控元件,对萜类合成途径的8个基因进行调控.对于不同的基因,其最适的调控元件强度各不相同.对8个基因的调控使β-胡萝卜素产量提高1.2～3.5倍.和以前报道不一样的是,文中发现用适当强度的调控元件对dxr、ispG和ispH基因进行调控后,也能提高β-胡萝卜素的生产.对dxs和idi基因的组合调控将β-胡萝卜素产量提高了8倍,最终β-胡萝卜素产量达17.59 mg/g干重细胞.结果表明使用多个不同强度的调控元件对基因表达进行调控比仅使用强启动子调控更为有效,为提高目标产品合成能力提供了一种新的基因表达调控方案.     

非典型应答调控蛋白活性调控机制

双组分信号转导系统是生物中广泛存在的调控系统,通常由组氨酸激酶和应答调控蛋白(Responseregulator,RR)两个组分构成。典型的RR通过一个磷酸化机制调控活性。非典型应答调控蛋白在细菌中广泛存在,并调控细菌的生长发育、抗生素合成、Fe的转运等多种生理功能。以下主要综述目前研究比较清楚的非典型应答调控蛋白的结构和功能方面的进展,并以链霉菌中杰多霉素生物合成途径中的非典型应答调控蛋白JadR1为例,阐明调控蛋白活性调控的新机制。     

顺式调控元件对“头对头”基因对共表达的影响

转录调控是生物学过程中最关键的环节之一,其中顺式调控元件在基因表达调控中发挥了极其重要的作用.本研究通过对公共顺式调控元件的活性和行为进行分析,从而推断"头对头"基因对共表达的原理.用网络组分分析法估测顺式调控元件在不同条件下对基因启动子及其活性的影响.结果揭示了生物系统如何利用这些调控元件调控"头对头"基因对的表达模式和整个转录调控系统.     

鼠疫耶尔森氏菌基因转录调控的研究进展

细菌基因转录调控是多种调控机制中研究最为广泛的一种模式。复杂而精细的基因转录调控网络有助于细菌应答外界环境压力,在病原菌致病与传播中均发挥着关键作用。本文以鼠疫耶尔森氏菌基因转录调控的相关研究进展为基础展开论述,重点阐述细菌的转录调控机制、转录调控的研究策略及鼠疫菌致病与传播中转录调控的作用,以期为深入研究鼠疫菌致病与传播中的基因转录调控分子机制提供新思路。     

运动对骨骼肌基因表达的表观遗传调控作用

DNA甲基化、组蛋白修饰和miRNA表达调控是表观遗传调控的3种重要方式,其在基因表达调控中发挥着关键作用。适当运动有益于身心健康。骨骼肌作为运动的主体组织,运动可以提高其代谢能力,改善其线粒体生物学功能,调控肌纤维类型转化,增加骨骼肌力量。近年来越来越多的研究表明,表观遗传调控在机体适应运动过程中发挥着重要作用,DNA甲基化、组蛋白修饰和miRNA表达调控等表观遗传调控方式通过调控骨骼肌基因表达来改变骨骼肌代谢能力、线粒体生物学功能和肌纤维类型,从而适应运动变化。本文对近年来运动对骨骼肌基因DNA甲基化、组蛋白修饰和相应miRNA表达调控等3种表观遗传调控方式的研究现状进行了综述,以期为进一步研究运动改善机体机能和健康提供参考。     

微生物细胞工厂的代谢调控

代谢调控是构建微生物细胞工厂的重要技术手段.随着合成生物学技术的不断突破,挖掘和人工设计的高质量调控元件大幅度提升了对细胞代谢网络的改造能力;代谢调控研究也已从单基因的静态调控发展到系统水平上的智能精确动态调控.文中简要综述了近30年来代谢途径表达调控技术在代谢工程领域的研究进展.     

真核生物转录调控进化的研究进展

转录调控进化在真核生物的表型进化中发挥了重要作用.首先介绍了基因转录调控元件,包括基因上游调控序列和转录因子的进化特点,然后阐述了转录调控进化在生物体进化中所起的作用,最后提出了当前研究转录调控进化所面临的问题和挑战.     

重组DNA技术中可诱导的基因表达调控系统

在重组DNA技术中,可诱导的基因表达调控系统可被用来调节目的基因的表达以达到基因功能研究、转基因动物研究、以及基因治疗研究等目的。该系统主要由诱导剂、可诱导的受体或转录因子、顺式作用元件以及载体系统四部分组成。本文以诱导剂为分类依据,叙述目前主要的6类可诱导的基因表达调控系统:类固醇激素受体诱导的基因表达调控系统、四环素诱导的基因表达调控系统、缺氧诱导的基因表达调控系统、高热诱导的基因表达调控系统、电离辐射诱导的基因表达调控系统和lac基因表达调控系统。     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor