The unfolding action of GroEL on a protein substrate

A molecular dynamics simulation of the active unfolding of denatured rhodanese by the chaperone GroEL is presented. The compact denatured protein is bound initially to the cis cavity and forms stable contacts with several of the subunits. As the cis ring apical domains of GroEL undergo the transition from the closed to the more open (ATP-bound) state, they exert a force on rhodanese that leads to the increased unfolding of certain loops. The contacts between GroEL and rhodanese are analyzed and their variation during the GroEL transition is shown. The major contacts, which give rise to the stretching force, are found to be similar to those observed in crystal structures of peptides bound to the apical domains. The results of the simulation show that multidomain interactions play an essential role, in accord with experiments. Implications of the results for mutation experiments and for the action of GroEL are discussed.     

Directed evolution of substrate-optimized GroEL/S chaperonins

GroEL/S chaperonin ring complexes fold many unrelated proteins. To understand the basis and extent of the chaperonin substrate spectrum, we used rounds of selection and DNA shuffling to obtain GroEL/S variants that dramatically enhanced folding of a single substrate-green fluorescent protein (GFP). Changes in the substrate-optimized chaperonins increase the polarity of the folding cavity and alter the ATPase cycle. These findings reveal a surprising plasticity of GroEL/S, which can be exploited to aid folding of recombinant proteins. Our studies also reveal a conflict between specialization and generalization of chaperonins as increased GFP folding comes at the expense of the ability of GroEL/S to fold its natural substrates. This conflict and the nature of the ring structure may help explain the evolution of cellular chaperone systems.     

Fibrillogenic propensity of the GroEL apical domain: a Janus-faced minichaperone

The chaperonin GroEL plays an essential role in promoting protein folding and in protecting against misfolding and aggregation in the cellular environment. In this study, we report that both GroEL and its isolated apical domain form amyloid-like fibrils under physiological conditions, and that the fibrillation of the apical domain is accelerated under acidic conditions. We also found, however, that despite its fibrillation propensity, the apical domain exhibits a pronounced inhibitory effect on the fibril growth of β(2)-microglobulin. Thus, the analysis of the behaviour of the apical domain reveals how aggregation and chaperone-mediated anti-aggregation processes can be closely related.     

Dependence of proteasome processing rate on substrate unfolding

Protein degradation by eukaryotic proteasomes is a multi-step process involving substrate recognition, ATP-dependent unfolding, translocation into the proteolytic core particle, and finally proteolysis. To date, most investigations of proteasome function have focused on the first and the last steps in this process. Here we examine the relationship between the stability of a folded protein domain and its degradation rate. Test proteins were targeted to the proteasome independently of ubiquitination by directly tethering them to the protease. Degradation kinetics were compared for test protein pairs whose stability was altered by either point mutation or ligand binding, but were otherwise identical. In both intact cells and in reactions using purified proteasomes and substrates, increased substrate stability led to an increase in substrate turnover time. The steady-state time for degradation ranged from ～5 min (dihydrofolate reductase) to 40 min (I27 domain of titin). ATP turnover was 110/min./proteasome, and was not markedly changed by substrate. Proteasomes engage tightly folded substrates in multiple iterative rounds of ATP hydrolysis, a process that can be rate-limiting for degradation.     

Switching substrate specificity of AMT/MEP/ Rh proteins

In organisms from all kingdoms of life, ammonia and its conjugated ion ammonium are transported across membranes by proteins of the AMT/Rh family. Efficient and successful growth often depends on sufficient ammonium nutrition. The proteins mediating this transport, the so called Ammonium Transporter (AMT) or Rhesus like (Rh) proteins, share a very similar trimeric overall structure and a high sequence similarity even throughout the kingdoms. Even though structural components of the transport mechanism, like an external substrate recruitment site, an essential twin histidine pore motif, a phenylalanine gate and the hydrophobic pore are strongly conserved and have been analyzed in detail by molecular dynamic simulations and mutational studies, the substrate(s), which pass the central pores of the AMT/Rh subunits, NH₄⁺, NH₃ + H⁺, NH₄⁺ + H⁺ or NH₃, are still a matter of debate for most proteins, including the best characterized AmtB protein from Escherichia coli. The lack of a robust expression system for functional analysis has hampered proof of structural and mutational studies, although the NH₃ transport function for Rh-like proteins is rarely disputed. In plant transporters belonging to the subfamily AMT1, transport is associated with electrical currents, while some plant transporters, notably of the AMT2 type, were suggested to transport NH₃ across the membrane, without associated ionic currents. Here we summarize data in favor of each substrate for the distinct AMT/Rh classes, discuss mutants and how they differ in structure and functionality. A common mechanism with deprotonation and subsequent NH₃ transport through the central subunit pore is suggested.     

Switching substrate specificity of AMT/MEP/ Rh proteins

In organisms from all kingdoms of life, ammonia and its conjugated ion ammonium are transported across membranes by proteins of the AMT/Rh family. Efficient and successful growth often depends on sufficient ammonium nutrition. The proteins mediating this transport, the so called Ammonium Transporter (AMT) or Rhesus like (Rh) proteins, share a very similar trimeric overall structure and a high sequence similarity even throughout the kingdoms. Even though structural components of the transport mechanism, like an external substrate recruitment site, an essential twin histidine pore motif, a phenylalanine gate and the hydrophobic pore are strongly conserved and have been analyzed in detail by molecular dynamic simulations and mutational studies, the substrate(s), which pass the central pores of the AMT/Rh subunits, NH₄⁺, NH₃ + H⁺, NH₄⁺ + H⁺ or NH₃, are still a matter of debate for most proteins, including the best characterized AmtB protein from Escherichia coli. The lack of a robust expression system for functional analysis has hampered proof of structural and mutational studies, although the NH₃ transport function for Rh-like proteins is rarely disputed. In plant transporters belonging to the subfamily AMT1, transport is associated with electrical currents, while some plant transporters, notably of the AMT2 type, were suggested to transport NH₃ across the membrane, without associated ionic currents. Here we summarize data in favor of each substrate for the distinct AMT/Rh classes, discuss mutants and how they differ in structure and functionality. A common mechanism with deprotonation and subsequent NH₃ transport through the central subunit pore is suggested.     

Commonly used caspase inhibitors designed based on substrate specificity profiles lack selectivity

Caspase regulation and activation have been extensively studied since the discovery of this class of proteases almost two decades ago, yet surprisingly few tools are available that can be used to monitor individual caspase activities [ 1 ]. The most commonly used tools include caspase-specific anti-sera as well as fluorogenic substrates and inhibitors. Unfortunately, antibody reagents often do not provide an accurate measure of caspase activity since several caspase family members （caspases 8/10 and 9） do not require proteolytic processing for activation [2, 3]. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that caspase-7 （an executioner caspase） activation occurs via a catalytically active full-length intermediate that cannot be differentiated from the non-cleaved inactive zymogen using antibodies [4, 5].     

Selective inhibition of fibroblast activation protein protease based on dipeptide substrate specificity

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a transmembrane serine peptidase that belongs to the prolyl peptidase family. FAP has been implicated in cancer; however, its specific role remains elusive because inhibitors that distinguish FAP from other prolyl peptidases like dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) have not been developed. To identify peptide motifs for FAP-selective inhibitor design, we used P(2)-Pro(1) and acetyl (Ac)-P(2)-Pro(1) dipeptide substrate libraries, where P(2) was varied and substrate hydrolysis occurs between Pro(1) and a fluorescent leaving group. With the P(2)-Pro(1) library, FAP preferred Ile, Pro, or Arg at the P(2) residue; however, DPP-4 showed broad reactivity against this library, precluding selectivity. By contrast, with the Ac-P(2)-Pro(1) library, FAP cleaved only Ac-Gly-Pro, whereas DPP-4 showed little reactivity with all substrates. FAP also cleaved formyl-, benzyloxycarbonyl-, biotinyl-, and peptidyl-Gly-Pro substrates, which DPP-4 cleaved poorly, suggesting an N-acyl-Gly-Pro motif for inhibitor design. Therefore, we synthesized and tested the compound Ac-Gly-prolineboronic acid, which inhibited FAP with a K(i) of 23 +/- 3 nm. This was approximately 9- to approximately 5400-fold lower than the K(i) values for other prolyl peptidases, including DPP-4, DPP-7, DPP-8, DPP-9, prolyl oligopeptidase, and acylpeptide hydrolase. These results identify Ac-Gly-BoroPro as a FAP-selective inhibitor and suggest that N-acyl-Gly-Pro-based inhibitors will allow testing of FAP as a therapeutic target.     

Lipid specificity for membrane mediated partial unfolding of cytochrome c

In this study we investigated the lipid specificity for destabilization of the native structure of horse heart cytochrome c by model membranes. From (i) the enhanced release of deuterium from deuterium-labelled cytochrome c and (ii) the increased proteolytic digestion of the protein in the presence of anionic lipids, it was concluded that these lipids are able to destabilize the native structure of cytochrome c. Changes in the absorbance at 695 nm indicated that the destabilization was accompanied by a diminished ligation of Met-80 to the heme. Beef heart cardiolipin was found to be more effective than DOPS, DOPG or DOPA, while no protein destabilization was observed in the presence of the zwitterionic lipid DOPC or, surprisingly, in the presence of E. coli cardiolipin. Experimnts with mitoplasts showed that the protein can also be destabilized in its native structure by a biological membrane.     

Basis of substrate binding by the chaperonin GroEL.

The molecular chaperonins are essential proteins involved in protein folding, complex assembly, and polypeptide translocation. While there is abundant structural information about the machinery and the mechanistic details of its action are well studied, it is yet unresolved how chaperonins recognize a large number of structurally unrelated polypeptides in their unfolded or partially folded forms. To determine the nature of chaperonin-substrate recognition, we have characterized by NMR methods the interactions of GroEL with synthetic peptides that mimic segments of unfolded proteins. In previous work, we found using transferred nuclear Overhauser effect (trNOE) analysis that two 13 amino acid peptides bound GroEL in an amphipathic alpha-helical conformation. By extending the study to a variety of peptides with differing sequence motifs, we have observed that peptides can adopt conformations other than alpha-helix when bound to GroEL. Furthermore, peptides of the same composition exhibited significantly different affinities for GroEL as manifested by the magnitude of trNOEs. Binding to GroEL correlates well with the ability of the peptide to cluster hydrophobic residues on one face of the peptide, as determined by the retention time on reversed-phase (RP) HPLC. We conclude that the molecular basis of GroEL-substrate recognition is the presentation of a hydrophobic surface by an incompletely folded polypeptide and that many backbone conformations can be accommodated.     

Site and substrate specificity of the ermC 23S rRNA methyltransferase.

The purified ermC methyltransferase described here incorporates two methyl groups per Bacillus subtilis 23S rRNA molecule in vitro. The Km for S-adenosyl-L-methionine was 12 microM, and for B. subtilis 23S rRNA the Km was 375 nM. In vivo methylation specified by several related resistance determinants prevented in vitro methylation by the ermC enzyme, suggesting that methylation specified by all of these determinants occurs at homologous sites. Since methyl groups were incorporated in protein-free 23S rRNA molecules, the structure of rRNA alone must contain sufficient information to specify the methylation site.     

Functional characterization of an archaeal GroEL/GroES chaperonin system: significance of substrate encapsulation

In all three kingdoms of life chaperonins assist the folding of a range of newly synthesized proteins. As shown recently, Archaea of the genus Methanosarcina contain both group I (GroEL/GroES) and group II (thermosome) chaperonins in the cytosol. Here we report on a detailed functional analysis of the archaeal GroEL/GroES system of Methanosarcina mazei (Mm) in comparison to its bacterial counterpart from Escherichia coli (Ec). We find that the groESgroEL operon of M. mazei is unable to functionally replace groESgroEL in E. coli. However, the MmGroES protein can largely complement a mutant EcGroES protein in vivo. The ATPase rate of MmGroEL is very low and the dissociation of MmGroES from MmGroEL is 15 times slower than for the EcGroEL/GroES system. This slow ATPase cycle results in a prolonged enclosure time for model substrate proteins, such as rhodanese, in the MmGroEL:GroES folding cage before their release into the medium. Interestingly, optimal functionality of MmGroEL/GroES and its ability to encapsulate larger proteins, such as malate dehydrogenase, requires the presence of ammonium sulfate in vitro. In the absence of ammonium sulfate, malate dehydrogenase fails to be encapsulated by GroES and rather cycles on and off the GroEL trans ring in a non-productive reaction. These results indicate that the archaeal GroEL/GroES system has preserved the basic encapsulation mechanism of bacterial GroEL and suggest that it has adjusted the length of its reaction cycle to the slower growth rates of Archaea. Additionally, the release of only the folded protein from the GroEL/GroES cage may prevent adverse interactions of the GroEL substrates with the thermosome, which is not normally located within the same compartment.     

Dextransucrase: studies on donor substrate specificity

Previous studies (D. S. Genghoff and E. J. Hehre, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 1972, 140, 1298–1301) have shown that an α-linked fluorine atom at C-1 of glucose provided sufficient activation to permit this analog to be a donor substrate for dextransucrase. In order to study the specificity at the donor substrate binding site, a series of α-1-fluorosugars have been synthesized. In kinetic experiments, it has been determined that they served as competitive inhibitors of sucrose, the natural substrate. A comparison of the K_i's provided information about the importance of specific changes in the glucose moiety with regard to binding to the enzyme. Similar kinetic studies were carried out with several β-1-fluorosugars, and the corresponding free monosaccharides. These were found to be noncompetitive inhibitors, and to bind poorly. The α-1-fluorosugars were also examined as donor substrates in reactions with known acceptors. With the exception of α-1-fluoroglucose, none of these analogs were active in this capacity.     

Topologies of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL

The chaperonin GroEL assists polypeptide folding through sequential steps of binding nonnative protein in the central cavity of an open ring, via hydrophobic surfaces of its apical domains, followed by encapsulation in a hydrophilic cavity. To examine the binding state, we have classified a large data set of GroEL binary complexes with nonnative malate dehydrogenase (MDH), imaged by cryo-electron microscopy, to sort them into homogeneous subsets. The resulting electron density maps show MDH associated in several characteristic binding topologies either deep inside the cavity or at its inlet, contacting three to four consecutive GroEL apical domains. Consistent with visualization of bound polypeptide distributed over many parts of the central cavity, disulfide crosslinking could be carried out between a cysteine in a bound substrate protein and cysteines substituted anywhere inside GroEL. Finally, substrate binding induced adjustments in GroEL itself, observed mainly as clustering together of apical domains around sites of substrate binding.     

Evaluation of substrate specificity of biosensor models based on strains degrading polycyclic aromatic compounds

Models of microbial biosensors based on 11 strains of degraders of surface-active substances (SASs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were studied. Substrate specificity, sensitivity, and stability of biosensor models were comparatively evaluated.Translated from Prikladnaya Biokhimiya i Mikrobiologiya, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2005, pp. 64–71.Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Reshetilov, Iliasov, Fesay, Ivashchenko, Taranova, Winther-Nielsen, Emneus.     

Evaluation of substrate specificity of biosensor models based on strains degrading polycyclic aromatic compounds

Models of microbial biosensors based on 11 strains of degrading surface-active substances (SASs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were studied. Substrate specificity, sensitivity, and stability of biosensor models were comparatively evaluated.     

Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL

The chaperonin GroEL binds nonnative substrate protein in the central cavity of an open ring through exposed hydrophobic residues at the inside aspect of the apical domains and then mediates productive folding upon binding ATP and the cochaperonin GroES. Whether nonnative proteins bind to more than one of the seven apical domains of a GroEL ring is unknown. We have addressed this using rings with various combinations of wild-type and binding-defective mutant apical domains, enabled by their production as single polypeptides. A wild-type extent of binary complex formation with two stringent substrate proteins, malate dehydrogenase or Rubisco, required a minimum of three consecutive binding-proficient apical domains. Rhodanese, a less-stringent substrate, required only two wild-type domains and was insensitive to their arrangement. As a physical correlate, multivalent binding of Rubisco was directly observed in an oxidative cross-linking experiment.     

Multi-faceted substrate specificity of heparanase

Heparan sulfate is a highly sulfated polysaccharide abundantly present in the extracellular matrix. Heparan sulfate consists of a disaccharide repeating unit of glucosamine and glucuronic and iduronic acid residues. The functions of heparan sulfate are largely dictated by its size as well as the sulfation patterns. Heparanase is an enzyme that cleaves heparan sulfate polysaccharide into smaller fragments, regulating the functions of heparan sulfate. Understanding the substrate specificity plays a critical role in dissecting the biological functions of heparanase and heparan sulfate. The prevailing view is that heparanase recognizes specific sulfation patterns in heparan sulfate. However, emerging evidence suggests that heparanase is capable of varying its substrate specificities depending on the saccharide structures around the cleavage site. The plastic substrate specificity suggests a complex role of heparanase in regulating the structures of heparan sulfate in matrix biology.